9 Amendments of Françoise GROSSETÊTE related to 2017/2087(INI)
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that the Ecodesign Directive has been a successful instrument for the improvement of energy efficiency, has brought economic benefits for consumers and has resulted in a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that coordination with initiatives connected to the circular economy would further enhance the effectiveness of the directive; calls, therefore, for an ambitious plan on ecodesign and the circular economy, providing both environmental benefits and opportunities for growth and jobs; notes, in this regard, that the use of secondary raw materials in manufacturing offers considerable potential for cutting waste and economising on resources;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls on the Commission to avoid delays in the adoption of implementing measures and recommends defining clear deadlines and milestones for their finalisation and for the revision of existing regulations; stresses the need to stick to the schedule provided for in the Commission’s 2016-2019 work programme, especially with regard to revision of the rules on office systems equipment (company servers and storage facilities), water-related products (e.g. taps), white goods (e.g. cooling equipment, washing machines and dishwashers) and lighting;
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Reiterates its call for a new impetus on the circular economy aspects of products and considers that the Ecodesign Directive provides significant potential for improving resource efficiency that has so far not been underused;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes, therefore, that the implementation of the Ecodesign Directive – in addition to continued efforts to improve energy efficiency – must now address the full life cycle of the products within its scope, with the setting up of minimum resource criteria covering, inter alia, robustness, repairability and upgradeability, but also sharing potential, reuse, scalability, recyclability and use of recycled materials or secondary raw materials in the manufacture of products;;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Believes, therefore, that the implementation of the Ecodesign Directive – in addition to continued efforts to improve energy efficiency – must now address the full life cycle of the products within its scope, with the setting up of minimum resource criteria covering, inter alia, robustness, repairability and upgradeability, but also sharing potential, reuse, scalability, recyclability and use of recycled materials; considers, nevertheless, that the number of criteria must be limited and that they must be defined in a clear and objective manner, whilst being easily measurable and entailing a reasonable cost, in order to guarantee a pragmatic approach, thus making it possible to preserve the operational nature of the Directive;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8 a (new)
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Emphasises that it is important that manufacturers should provide clear and objective instructions enabling users and independent repairers to repair products more easily, without specific equipment; also stresses the importance of providing information on the availability of spare parts and product lifetimes, where possible;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Insists on the need to strengthen the surveillance of products placed on the internal market through better cooperation between Member States and between the Commission and national authorities; stresses that it is important that the checks concerned should be based on a precise definition of measurement standards and that they should be carried out at a reasonable cost;