BETA


2017/2087(INI) Implementation of the Ecodesign Directive (2009/125/EC)

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ENVI RIES Frédérique (icon: ALDE ALDE) GAMBUS MILLET Francisco de Paula (icon: PPE PPE), PAOLUCCI Massimo (icon: S&D S&D), BAREKOV Nikolay (icon: ECR ECR), AUKEN Margrete (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), EVI Eleonora (icon: EFDD EFDD), GODDYN Sylvie (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion ITRE RIVASI Michèle (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE) Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Edward CZESAK (icon: ECR ECR), Dario TAMBURRANO (icon: EFDD EFDD), Pavel TELIČKA (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2018/11/16
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2018/05/31
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/05/31
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 561 votes to 45, with 17 abstentions, a resolution on the implementation of the Ecodesign Directive.

The Ecodesign Directive has been a successful instrument for the improvement of energy efficiency. It has resulted in a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and has led to economic benefits for consumers. Members recommended that the Commission continue to include more product groups selected on the basis of their ecodesign potential, including both energy efficiency and material efficiency potential as well as other environmental aspects.

Stressing that coordination with initiatives connected to the circular economy would further enhance the effectiveness of the directive, Parliament called for an ambitious plan on ecodesign and the circular economy , providing both environmental benefits and opportunities for sustainable growth and jobs, including in the SME sector, as well as advantages for consumers.

Strengthening the decision-making process : Members highlighted the key role of the Consultation Forum in the decision-making process, but expressed concern about delays in implementation. In this regard, the Commission is called on to:

deploy sufficient resources for the ecodesign process given the significant EU added value of the legislation; avoid delays in the adoption and publication of implementing measures; define clear deadlines and milestones for finalisation of the implementation measures and revise existing regulations; give priority to the implementation and review of measures relating to products that have the greatest potential in terms of both primary energy savings and the circular economy; include assessments on release of microplastics into the aquatic environment in the ecodesign measures where appropriate; introduce mandatory requirements for microplastic filters in the review of the ecodesign measures for household washing machines and washer dryers.

From energy savings to resource efficiency : reiterating its call for a new impetus on the circular economy aspects of products, Parliament considered that the implementation of the Ecodesign Directive must now systematically address the full lifecycle of each product group within its scope by the setting up of minimum resource efficiency criteria covering, inter alia , durability, robustness, reparability and upgradability, reuse, recyclability, possibility of remanufacturing, content of recycled or secondary raw materials, and the use of critical raw materials.

The resolution also stressed the importance of providing information on the on the availability of spare parts and product lifetimes , where possible. The minimum guarantees for consumer durable goods should be extended. Transparency for consumers should also be improved. Substances of concern should be avoided or limited at the product design stage. Transparency for consumers should also be enhanced.

The Commission has postponed action on information and communication technologies (ICT) such as mobiles and smartphones , pending further assessments and given the rapid technological changes in this product group. Members considered, however, that these products, which are sold in large numbers and replaced frequently, have a clear potential for improvements, in particular in terms of resource efficiency, and that ecodesign criteria should therefore be applied.

Improving market surveillance : Members insisted on the need to strengthen the surveillance of products placed on the internal market through better cooperation and coordination between Member States and between the Commission and national authorities and through the provision of adequate financial resources to the market surveillance authorities.

The Commission is called on to examine the potential of establishing a digital product fact sheet (‘ product passport ’), as a tool to disclose materials and substances used in products, which would also facilitate market surveillance.

Parliament put forward a number of proposals to tighten up coordination between national market surveillance authorities:

that national authorities be required to use the ICSMS database to share all the results of product compliance checks and testing carried out for all products covered by Ecodesign regulations; that the general product registration database for energy labelled products be extended to all products covered by Ecodesign regulations; that national authorities be required to draw up specific plans for their market surveillance activities in the area of ecodesign, to be notified to other Member States and to the Commission; Member States should include random inspections in these plans; that the Commission consider defining a minimum percentage of products on the market to be tested, as well as develop a mandate for carrying out its own independent market surveillance and make proposals, as appropriate; that deterrent measures be adopted, including: sanctions for non-compliant manufacturers proportional to the impact of non-compliance on the entire European market and compensation for consumers who have purchased non-compliant products, even beyond the legal warranty period, including through collective redress; that particular attention be paid to non-EU imports and products sold online.

Lastly, the resolution underlined the need to provide the general public, and in particular the media, with clear information about the benefits of ecodesign ahead of the release of a measure.

Special attention should be paid to low-income households at risk of energy poverty when presenting programmes to encourage the uptake of the most resource-efficient products.

Documents
2018/05/31
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/05/30
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/05/07
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety adopted the own-initiative report by Frédérique RIES (ALDE, BE) on the implementation of the Ecodesign Directive (2009/125/EC).

The report stated that the Ecodesign Directive has been a successful instrument for the improvement of energy efficiency. It has resulted in a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and has led to economic benefits for consumers. Members recommended that the Commission continue to include more product groups selected on the basis of their ecodesign potential, including both energy efficiency and material efficiency potential as well as other environmental aspects.

Stressing that coordination with initiatives connected to the circular economy would further enhance the effectiveness of the directive, Members called for an ambitious plan on ecodesign and the circular economy , providing both environmental benefits and opportunities for sustainable growth and jobs, including in the SME sector, as well as advantages for consumers.

Strengthening the decision-making process : Members noted that the implementation delays are due in part to the limited resources available within the Commission. In this regard, the Commission is called on to:

deploy sufficient resources for the ecodesign process given the significant EU added value of the legislation; avoid delays in the adoption and publication of implementing measures; define clear deadlines and milestones for finalisation of the implementation measures and revise existing regulations; give priority to the implementation and review of measures relating to products that have the greatest potential in terms of both primary energy savings and the circular economy; include assessments on release of microplastics into the aquatic environment in the ecodesign measures where appropriate; introduce mandatory requirements for microplastic filters in the review of the ecodesign measures for household washing machines and washer dryers.

From energy savings to resource efficiency : reiterating their call for a new impetus on the circular economy aspects of products, Members considered that the implementation of the Ecodesign Directive must now systematically address the full lifecycle of each product group within its scope by the setting up of minimum resource efficiency criteria covering, inter alia , durability, robustness, reparability and upgradability, reuse, recyclability, possibility of remanufacturing, content of recycled or secondary raw materials, and the use of critical raw materials.

Members also stressed the importance of providing information on the availability of spare parts and product lifetimes, where possible. Transparency for consumers should also be enhanced.

Members noted that the Commission has postponed action on information and communication technologies (ICT) such as mobiles and smartphones , pending further assessments and given the rapid technological changes in this product group. They considered, however, that these products, which are sold in large numbers and replaced frequently, have a clear potential for improvements, in particular in terms of resource efficiency, and that ecodesign criteria should therefore be applied to them and that efforts should be made to streamline the regulatory progress.

Improving market surveillance : Members insisted on the need to strengthen the surveillance of products placed on the internal market through better cooperation and coordination between Member States and between the Commission and national authorities and through the provision of adequate financial resources to the market surveillance authorities.

They called on the Commission to examine the potential of establishing a digital product fact sheet (‘ product passport ’), as a tool to disclose materials and substances used in products, which would also facilitate market surveillance.

Members put forward a number of proposals to tighten up coordination between national market surveillance authorities:

that the general product registration database for energy labelled products be extended to all products covered by Ecodesign regulations; that national authorities be required to draw up specific plans for their market surveillance activities in the area of ecodesign, to be notified to other Member States and to the Commission; Member States should include random inspections in these plans; that the Commission consider defining a minimum percentage of products on the market to be tested, as well as develop a mandate for carrying out its own independent market surveillance and make proposals, as appropriate; that deterrent measures be adopted, including: sanctions for non-compliant manufacturers proportional to the impact of non-compliance on the entire European market and compensation for consumers who have purchased non-compliant products, even beyond the legal warranty period, including through collective redress; that particular attention be paid to non-EU imports and products sold online.

Lastly, the Commission and the Member States are encouraged to communicate proactively on the benefits of ecodesign measures as an integral part of the process of adopting these measures, and to engage more actively with stakeholders to improve people’s understanding of the legislation. Special attention should be paid to low-income households at risk of energy poverty when presenting programmes to encourage the uptake of the most resource-efficient products.

Documents
2018/04/25
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/03/22
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2018/03/12
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/03/09
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/01/31
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2017/07/06
   EP - RIVASI Michèle (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE
2017/06/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2017/05/18
   EP - RIES Frédérique (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI

Documents

Votes

A8-0165/2018 - Frédérique Ries - Am 8 31/05/2018 12:28:05.000 #

2018/05/31 Outcome: -: 568, +: 45, 0: 14
?? SI LU CY LV EE MT DK LT SK NL IE EL HU FI HR BG CZ SE BE AT PT GB RO PL ES IT FR DE
Total
1
2
5
5
6
6
6
7
10
11
21
9
16
15
11
11
12
17
17
19
18
20
58
25
44
49
58
64
82
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3

France NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
31

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1
2

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
43

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4
icon: ECR ECR
55

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Germany ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
164

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Denmark S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

1

Slovakia S&D

2

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Greece S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
176

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Greece PPE

2

Sweden PPE

2
3

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0165/2018 - Frédérique Ries - Am 2S 31/05/2018 12:29:10.000 #

2018/05/31 Outcome: -: 568, +: 37, 0: 23
?? SI LU CY LV EE MT SK DK EL HR IE LT FI HU BG CZ NL SE BE AT PT GB RO PL FR ES IT DE
Total
1
3
5
5
6
6
6
11
7
16
11
9
10
11
14
12
17
22
17
19
18
20
58
25
44
64
49
58
82
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
31

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1
2

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3

France NI

Abstain (1)

1

Germany NI

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

France Verts/ALE

4

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: ECR ECR
54

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Denmark ECR

2

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Germany ECR

For (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: S&D S&D
163

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

Against (1)

2

Denmark S&D

2

Greece S&D

3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Finland S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2
3

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
177

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Greece PPE

2

Ireland PPE

3

Sweden PPE

2
3

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0165/2018 - Frédérique Ries - Am 3/1 31/05/2018 12:29:21.000 #

2018/05/31 Outcome: -: 582, +: 33, 0: 14
?? SI LU CY LV EE MT DK HR IE AT LT EL FI SK BG HU CZ NL SE BE PT GB RO PL IT ES FR DE
Total
1
3
5
5
6
6
6
7
11
9
18
10
16
11
11
12
14
17
22
17
19
20
58
25
44
57
49
64
84
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3

France NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
31

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: ECR ECR
55

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Germany ECR

For (1)

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: S&D S&D
162

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Denmark S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Greece S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2
3

Hungary S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
178

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Greece PPE

2

Sweden PPE

2
3

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0165/2018 - Frédérique Ries - Am 3/2 31/05/2018 12:29:32.000 #

2018/05/31 Outcome: -: 536, +: 70, 0: 14
PL ?? DK SI LV LU EE CY MT SK LT FI HR HU IE BG EL AT CZ SE NL BE PT RO GB IT ES FR DE
Total
44
1
6
3
6
5
5
5
6
11
9
11
11
13
9
12
16
18
16
17
22
18
20
24
57
57
49
63
84
icon: ECR ECR
54

Denmark ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

2

Italy ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Germany ECR

For (1)

4
icon: NI NI
17

NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

3

France NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
37

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Against (1)

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
31

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Germany ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
41

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
58

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (2)

2

Finland ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Germany ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
160

Denmark S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Slovakia S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Hungary S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Greece S&D

3

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
176

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Greece PPE

2

Sweden PPE

For (1)

Against (1)

2
3

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0165/2018 - Frédérique Ries - Am 4S 31/05/2018 12:29:42.000 #

2018/05/31 Outcome: -: 579, +: 41, 0: 7
?? SI LU CY LV EE MT DK SK IE AT LT EL FI HR BG HU CZ NL SE BE PT GB RO PL ES IT FR DE
Total
1
3
5
5
6
6
6
7
11
9
18
10
16
11
11
12
14
17
22
17
19
20
58
24
44
49
57
63
84
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

Against (2)

3

France NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
31

Netherlands ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1
2

Germany ENF

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
43

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

3

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

France Verts/ALE

4
icon: ECR ECR
55

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Denmark ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

For (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Romania ECR

2

Italy ECR

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
44

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
59

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

3

Portugal ALDE

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

2

Germany ALDE

2
icon: S&D S&D
161

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Denmark S&D

2

Slovakia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

1

Greece S&D

3

Finland S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2
3

Hungary S&D

2

Czechia S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Belgium S&D

3
icon: PPE PPE
177

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Latvia PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Ireland PPE

3

Greece PPE

2

Sweden PPE

2
3

United Kingdom PPE

2

A8-0165/2018 - Frédérique Ries - Am 5 31/05/2018 12:31:33.000 #

2018/05/31 Outcome: -: 527, +: 67, 0: 32
GB DK ?? IE SI LU CY LV EE MT CZ SK HU LT FI HR BG EL BE SE NL AT PT RO PL FR IT ES DE
Total
58
7
1
9
3
5
5
6
6
6
17
11
14
10
11
11
12
16
19
17
21
18
20
25
44
63
57
49
83
icon: EFDD EFDD
38

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1