BETA

Activities of Françoise GROSSETÊTE related to 2018/0254(COD)

Plenary speeches (2)

European Defence Fund (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0254(COD)
Establishing the European Defence Fund (debate) FR
2016/11/22
Dossiers: 2018/0254(COD)

Shadow reports (1)

REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Defence Fund PDF (1 MB) DOC (197 KB)
2016/11/22
Committee: ITRE
Dossiers: 2018/0254(COD)
Documents: PDF(1 MB) DOC(197 KB)

Amendments (34)

Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 3
(3) Following an integrated approach and in order to contribute to the enhancement of the competitiveness and innovation capacity of the Union's defence industry, a European Defence Fund should be established. The Fund should aim at enhancing the competitiveness, innovation, efficiency and technological and industrial autonomy of the Union's defence industry thereby contributing to the Union's strategic autonomy by supporting the cross border cooperation between Member States and between enterprises, research centres, national administrations, international organisations and universities, in the research phase and in the development phase of defence products and technologies. To achieve more innovative solutions and an open internal market, the Fund should support the cross-border participation of defence small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and middle capitalisation companies (mid-caps).
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. The general objective of the Fund is to foster the competitiveness, efficiency and innovation capacity of the European defence industry, by supporting collaborative actions and cross-border cooperation between legal entities throughout the Union, including SMEs and mid-caps as well as fostering the better exploitation of the industrial potential of innovation, research and technological development, at each stage of the industrial life cycle, thus contributing to the Union strategic autonomy. The Fund should alsoall contribute to the freedom of action of the Union and its autonomy, in particular in technological and industrial terms.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 4
4. Up toAt least 5 % of the financial envelope referred to in paragraph 1 shall be devoted to support disruptive technologies for defence.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 5
5. Resources allocated to Member States under shared management may, at their request, be transferred to the Fund. The Commission shall implement those resources directly in accordance with Article [62(1)(a)] of the Financial Regulation. Where possible those resources shall be used for the benefit of the Member State concerned.deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 2
2. Proposals shall be systematically screened to identify those actions raising complex or serious ethics issues and submit them to an ethics assessment. Ethics screenings and assessments shall be carried out by the Commission with the support of experts on defence ethics. All experts shall be required to be validated by the Member States that has issued their security clearance. The appropriate security clearance shall be required before appointment. The Commission shall ensure the transparency of the ethics procedures as much as possible.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 4
4. If appropriate, ethics checks shall be carried out by the Commission during the implementation of the action. For serious or complex ethics issues, the checks shall be carried out by the Commission with the support of experts on defence ethics.deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 5
5. Actions which are not ethically acceptable may be rejected or terminated at any timshall not be eligible.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation
Title 1 – chapter 3 – title
ELIGIBILITY AND GRANTS
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1
1. Applicants and their subcontractors involved in the action shall be eligible for funding provided that they are established in the Union or in an associated country, have their executive management structures in the Union or in an associated country and are not controlled by a non- associated third country or by a non- associated third country entity.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. By derogation from paragraph 1, an applicant established and having its executive management structure in the Union or in an associated country and controlled by a non- associated third country or a non- associated third country entity may be eligible for funding if this is necessary for achieving the objectives of the actionprogramme and provided that its participation will not put at risk the security interests of the Union and its Member States. In order to ensure protection of the security interests of the Union and its Member States, the call for proposals shall require the applicant to provide information demonstrating notablycommit to implement measures before the beginning of the action ensuring that:
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) the results of the action shall remain within the beneficiary and shall not be subject to control or restrictions by non- associated third countries or other non- associated third country entities during the action and for a specified perioand cannot be exported or given access outside the Union without the approval of the Member State in which the undertaking is established in, during the action and after its completion;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 3
3. All infrastructure, facilities, assets and resources used in actions financed under the Fund shall be located on the territory of the Union or associated countries and shall not be subject to any control or restriction by a non-associated third country or by a non-associated third country entity. Furthermore, when performing an eligible action, beneficiaries and their subcontractors shall cooperate only with legal entities established in the Union or in an associated country and not controlled by non-associated third countries or non- associated third country entities.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 4
4. By derogation from the paragraph 3, if there are no competitive substitutes readily available in the Union, beneficiaries and subcontractors involved in the action may use their assets, infrastructure, facilities and resources located or held on the territory of a non- associated third country if this is necessary for achieving the objectives of an action and provided that this will not put at riskcontravene the security and defence interests of the Union and its Member States and the objectives of the programme. Under the same conditions, when performing an eligible action, beneficiaries and their subcontractors may cooperate with an entity established in a non- associated third country. The costs related to the use of such infrastructure, facilities, assets or resources and to such cooperation shall not be eligible under the Fund.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 5
5. In order to ensure protection of the security interests of the Union and its Member States, the call for proposals or grant agreement shall specify further conditions, in addition to those mentioned in Article 10. These conditions shall relate, in particular to the provisions on ownership of results of the action and access to classified and non-classified sensitive information and to guarantees on security of supply.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) studies, such as feasibility studies to explore the feasibility of a new or improved technology, product, process, service, solution or statistics on the defence industry and projects to pilot the collection of data;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11 – paragraph 4
4. Unless otherwise provided for in the work programme referred to in Article 27, the action shall be undertaken in a cooperation of at least three legal entities which are established in at least three different Member States and/or associated countries. At least three of these eligible entities established in at least two Member States and/or associated countries shall not, during the whole implementation of the action, be effectively controlled, directly or indirectly, by the same entity, and shall not control each other. If the cooperation includes at least one legal entity from an associated country, at least two legal entities from two different Member States shall participate.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
(ca) contribution to the industrial and technological autonomy of the Union by enhancing defence technologies or products in line with defence capability priorities agreed by Member States within the framework of the Common Foreign and Security Policy;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) contribution to the security and defence interests of the Union in line with the priorities referred to in Article 3 paragraph 2 and, where appropriate, regional and international cooperative agreements;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) contribution to the creation of new cross-border cooperation between legal entities, in particular for SMEs which are established in Member States and/or associated countries other than those where the entities in the consortium which are not SMEs are established;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 2
2. Under points (d) of paragraph 1, regional and international priorities may be taken into account, in particular to avoid unnecessary duplication, provided they serve the Union's security and defence interests and do not exclude the participation of any Member State.deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1
1. The Fund mayshall finance up to 100% of the eligible costs of an action without prejudice to the co-financing principle.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) a consortium shall benefit from a funding rate increased by the percentage points equivalent to the half of the percentage of the total eligible costs allocated to SMEs; if SME's are established in a Member State or an associated country other than those in which the consortium members that are not SMEs are established in, the consortium will benefit from a funding rate increased by 10% of the total eligible costs allocated to those mid-caps;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) a consortium shall benefit from a funding rate increased by the percentage points equivalent to the quarter of the percentage of the total eligible costs allocated to mid-caps; if mid-caps are established in a Member State or an associated country other than those in which the other consortium members that are not SMEs or mid-caps are established in, the consortium will benefit from a funding rate increased by 5% of the total eligible costs allocated to those mid-caps;
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point d
(d) the overall increase in the funding rate of an action shall not exceed 320 percentage points.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 1
1. Indirect eligible costs shall be determined by applying a flat rate of 25 % of the total direct eligible costs, exincluding direct eligible costs for subcontracting, but excluding financial support to third parties and any unit costs or lump sums which include indirect costs.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2
2. Where appropriatAs an alternative, indirect eligible costs beyond the flat rate of 25 % may be determined in accordance with the beneficiary's usual cost accounting practices on the basis of actual indirect costs provided that these cost accounting practices are accepted by national authorities under comparable funding schemes in accordance with Article [185] of the Financial Regulation and communicated to the Commission.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1
Where necessary fFor the protection of the essential security interest of the Union and its Member States, the Commission shall set the requisite eligibility conditions applicable to the procurement or prizes financed by the Fund. Particular regard shall be had, for that purpose, to the need for recipients to be established in the Union or in associated countries, to commit to carry out any relevant activities inside the Union and not to be effectively controlled by non- associated third countries or non- associated third country' entities. Those conditions shall be included in the documents relating to the procurement or prize, as applicable, and shall apply to the full life cycle of the resulting contract.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 1
1. The results of the actions shall be owned by the beneficiaries generating them. Where legal entities jointly generate results, and where their respective contribution cannot be ascertained, or where it is not possible to separate such joint results, the legal entities shall have joint ownership of the results. The joint owners will establish an agreement regarding the allocation and terms of exercise of that joint ownership in accordance with their obligations under the grant agreement.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 3
3. If justified the grant agreement may require that tThe results of actions receiving support from the Fund shall not be subject to any control or restriction, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediate legal entities, including in terms of technology transfer by a non- associated third country or by a non- associated third country entity.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 7
7. The beneficiaries shall grant access rights to their results on a royalty- free basis to the Union institutions, bodies or agencies, for duly justified purpose of developing, implementing and monitoring Union policies or programmes. Such access rights shall be limited to non- commercial and non-competitive use.deleted
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 22 – paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Any two or more Member States or associated countries that, multilaterally or within the frame of an EU organisation, jointly have concluded one or several contracts with one or more participants to further develop together results obtained within the frame of a specific action that has received funding under a grant agreement for a research action on defence, shall enjoy access rights to the results of the action that are owned by such participant(s) and are necessary for the execution of the contract(s). Such access rights shall be granted on a royalty-free basis and under specific conditions aimed at ensuring that those rights will be used only for the purpose of the contract(s) and that appropriate confidentiality obligations will be in place
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the level of cooperation between Members States in the eligible actionquality of the industrial set-up and governance of programme management.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. The results of the actions shall be owned by the beneficiaries generating them. Where legal entities jointly generate results, and where their respective contribution cannot be ascertained, or where it is not possible to separate such joint results, the legal entities shall have joint ownership of the results. The joint owners will establish an agreement regarding the allocation and terms of exercise of that joint ownership in accordance with their obligations under the grant agreement.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 2
2. The Commission shall implement information and communication actions relating to the Fund, and its actions and results. Financial resources allocated to the Fund shall also contribute to the corporate communication of the political priorities of the Union, as far as they are related to the objectives referred to in Article 3, and may be used for projects on statistics on the defence industry and projects to pilot the collection of data.
2018/09/14
Committee: ITRE