19 Amendments of Margarita DE LA PISA CARRIÓN related to 2020/2216(INI)
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights that European leadership in digital transition can be a reality; notes that a second wave of digitalisation lies ahead; underlines that a common EU approach can makecontribute to making Europe the most competitive and innovative region in therespected worldwide by 2030;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Recalls that women account for 30 % of the technology workforce and 17 % of ICT specialists in Europe, and that the EU economy would, according to expectations, be boosted by EUR 16 billion a year if women technology graduates followed through to digital jobs at the same rate as men;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights that gender equality is a core principle of the European Union and should be reflected in all EU policies; recalls that women’s participation in the digital economy is crucialimportant to shaping a flourishing digital society and to boosting the EU’s digital internal market;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Calls on the Commission to continue addressing the gender gapwomen's participation within the ICT sector and to establish policies to increase the participation of women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) and AI, and to advocate measures in education and employment in the digital sector in order to achieve this;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Recognises that the EU has an enormously strong SME sector, which creates a backbone to the EU economy and competitiveness; recalls that this second wage of digitalisation could lead to a strong industrial development of SMEs; calls for a goal of 500emphasises the importance to support the emergence of a significant number of digital unicorns within 10 years;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. Stresses that any legislative proposals related to digital area should be based on in-depth impact assessment to avoid unnecessary administrative or regulatory burden that could hamper the emergence of high-tech unicorns, start- ups and SMEs in Europe in order to unleash their potential at the global scale; invites therefore the Commission to come forward with a comparative analysis of regulatory environment in third countries;
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Considers that AI can significantly contribute to promoting gender equalitywomen, provided that an appropriate legal framework is developed, conscious and unconscious biases are eliminated and the principles of gender equality are respected; stresses the lack of diversity in the AI sector within teams of developers and engineers, and the importance of using sex-disaggregated data when developing products, AI standards, algorithms and applications;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Expresses concern that the gender gap in digital skills puts women are at a disadvantage in the emerging digital markets; stresses the importance of empowering consumconsidering users, particularly women, through teaching basic ICT skills and launching awareness-raising campaigns in order to enable them to take full advantage of the benefits of the digital single market;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Emphasises that the COVID crisis provides an opportunity to speed up digitalisation; calls for financial incentivunderlines the importance of financial incentives and opportunities through different EU programmes for SMEs that want to enter new markets;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Calls for special attention to be paid to women as vulnerable consumers and to the rise in cyber violence against women in the digital world, and welcomes the Commission’s proposal on the digital services act (COM(2020)0825), which is addressing these issues.
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Calls for special economic digital zones to promote structural change and create development cores for new digital economic structures across Europe in order to support a swift digital transition;
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4 a. Emphasises that future-proof connectivity and cybersecurity represent a prerequisite of Union’s success in digital transition;
Amendment 72 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Reiterates the necessity to fully exploit all funding facilities and to benefit out of synergies provided for digital technologies by EU funding programmes, namely Horizon Europe, Digital Europe, CEF-Digital and Space Programme;
Amendment 82 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Demands measures to end to the brain drain andthat the conditions for EU's digital ecosystem composed of universities, research centers, business incubators and entreprises should be enhances to prevent the brain drain of European experts and to attract the best minds to the EU;
Amendment 102 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Recognises that AI deployment is key to European competitiveness in the digital eraof trustworthy and human-centric AI is key to European competitiveness of European businesses in the digital era, enabling them to bring innovative solutions to the market and scale up globally; highlights that to facilitate the uptake of AI in Europe, a common European approach is needed to avoid sinternalgle market fragmentation;
Amendment 111 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Considers that access to big data is key for the development of AI; calls for a new approach to data regulation, cloud services and computing capacities is key for the development of AI;
Amendment 119 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 10 a (new)
Paragraph 10 a (new)
10 a. Acknowledges the current success of the European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking, an initiative of the EU engaging both Member States and private partners; welcomes the recently published Commission proposal on its continuation to maintain and advance Europe’s leading role in supercomputing and quantum computing strongly needed for the development of AI in Europe;
Amendment 133 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 11
Paragraph 11
11. Warns against overregulating AI; demands that risk-based approach towards AI should be applied as a leading principle; recalls that regulation must be balanced, agile, permanently evaluated, and based on soft regulation except for high-risk areas; , particularly on self-regulation and voluntary practices such as voluntary labelling; acknowledges however that a legislative framework might be necessary for a strictly limited categories of high-risk AI;
Amendment 146 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 12
Paragraph 12