3 Amendments of Johannes VOGGENHUBER related to 2008/2063(INI)
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 - point b
Paragraph 4 - point b
(b) establishing permanent and deeper relations withbetween European and national legislators, on the one hand, and between European and national judges and legislators, on the other hand, on matters of shared competencies with Member States;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. The multiannual programme for the FSJA should continue to be debated in an annual debate which should focus on the protection of fundamental rights in the European Union, on the implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and on Member States' compliance with the values and principles laid down by the new Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU). It should be based on reports from the Council, the Commission and the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). The European Parliament shares the view of the Trio Council Presidencies1 (FR,CZ,SW) that a "possible review of the mandate of the Agency for Fundamental Rights should be undertaken by December 31st 2009" and that such a review gives the opportunity to deepen the cooperation with the Council of Europe, its Secretary General, its Commissioner for Human Rights and the relevant Parliamentary assembly committees.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 17 a (new)
Paragraph 17 a (new)
17a. The European Parliament welcomes the Trio Presidency assessment that "Coercive measures should be accompanied by corresponding rules to strengthen the rights of the individual, whether a suspect, victim or witness. The possible development of the rights of victims will be examined on the basis of the Commission's assessment of the implementation of the Framework Decision on the Standing of Victims in Criminal Proceedings. After the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, a proposal for a legal instrument on procedural rights in criminal proceedings will be expected from the Commission or from Member States."