Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFCO | LEINEN Jo ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | PETI | CARNERO GONZÁLEZ Carlos ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | REGI | GALEOTE Gerardo ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | BUDREIKAITĖ Danutė ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | CULT | BADIA I CUTCHET Maria ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | AFET | SARYUSZ-WOLSKI Jacek ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | PECH | MIGUÉLEZ RAMOS Rosa ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | AGRI | BUSK Niels ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | MARTIN David ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ANDERSSON Jan ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | JURI | WALLIS Diana ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | ECON | BERÈS Pervenche ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | CONT | ||
Committee Opinion | LIBE | VOGGENHUBER Johannes ( Verts/ALE) | |
Committee Opinion | INTA | PAPASTAMKOS Georgios ( PPE-DE) | |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | GEBHARDT Evelyne ( PSE) | |
Committee Opinion | TRAN | COSTA Paolo ( ALDE) | |
Committee Opinion | FEMM | GIBAULT Claire ( ALDE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4
Legal Basis:
RoP 54, RoP 54-p4Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 441 votes to 77, with 18 abstentions, a resolution on Parliament's new role and responsibilities in implementing the Treaty of Lisbon.
1. New policies
- New objectives and horizontal clauses : the Charter of Fundamental Rights, representative and participatory democracy and gender equality have all been included in the Union’s values and aims and have been given a prominent position. Members also welcome the introduction of horizontal provisions on a high level of employment, social protection, the fight against social exclusion, a high level of education, training and protection of human health, combating discrimination, and environmental protection. Consumer protection has been strengthened to the extent that it is to be mainstreamed into the other Union policies to be laid down and implemented, and, as a cross-cutting task, now occupies a much more prominent place.
- New legal bases : the resolution underlines that the broadening of the Union's external action under the Lisbon Treaty, including the provision of new legal bases and instruments affecting areas related to foreign policy (external action and the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)/Common Security and Defence Policy), necessitates a new interinstitutional balance guaranteeing adequate democratic scrutiny by Parliament.
The new Treaty also provides for new legal bases in the following areas:
energy : energy matters will now be covered by a separate Title XXI in Part Three of the TFEU and that action in that field will thus have a legal basis; space : the Parliament stresses its satisfaction at the insertion of a provision on a European space policy and welcomes the opportunity given to Parliament and to the Council to adopt, under the ordinary legislative procedure, the necessary measures establishing a European space programme; intellectual property rights : the Treaty of Lisbon includes a new legal basis providing for codecision in respect of intellectual property rights; finance : the legal basis for the adoption of European Union measures in the fields of the prevention of and fight against fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union will be strengthened; criminal matters : the Parliament points out that the new Treaty provisions concerning judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters include a legal basis for the adoption of measures to support the training of the judiciary and judicial staff. The Treaty of Lisbon also provides for the possible establishment of a European Public Prosecutor's Office in order to combat crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union; child protection : binding provisions for the protection of the rights of the child in the internal and external objectives of the European Union have been introduced; tourism and sport : this has been included as a new title in the Lisbon Treaty. Therefore, the Union can finally take action for the development of sport and its European dimension and can take due account of the specific nature of sport when applying other European policies.
2. New powers for the European Parliament : overall, the resolution welcomes the fact that, with a few exceptions, the new Treaty would place the European Parliament on an equal footing with the Council as a lawmaker in areas where this has not been case so far, notably in setting the EU budget (the European Parliament would enjoy full parity), agriculture policy and justice and home affairs . On this last issue, the area of freedom, security and justice is fully integrated into the TFEU, formally putting an end to the third pillar.
The Parliament believes that the responsibility of the European Central Bank to report on monetary policy is now greater, since the ECB is recognised as an institution of the European Union. It welcomes the fact that several provisions of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) and of the ECB can be modified after consulting Parliament.
Concerning the implementation of the Structural Funds , the Lisbon Treaty places Parliament on an equal footing with the Council by replacing the current assent procedure by the ordinary legislative procedure. Legislation prohibiting discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation will become subject to a special legislative procedure and will require Parliament’s consent.
The Parliament welcomes the fact that codecision will henceforth apply to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, inasmuch as this will allow Parliament to take part on an equal footing with the Council in the adjustment of those regulations.
New budgetary powers : the resolution notes that the Treaty of Lisbon makes sweeping changes in the area of the Union’s finances, particularly as regards interinstitutional relations and decision-making procedures. The Council and Parliament must agree, within the limits of own resources, on the programming of expenditure which becomes legally binding. The Parliament welcomes the fact that the budget as a whole must be adopted jointly by Parliament and the Council, in compliance with the multiannual financial framework and it welcomes the abolition of the distinction between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure .
New consent procedure : the Parliament welcomes the fact that the simplified revision procedure with regard to the introduction of qualified majority voting and the introduction of the ordinary legislative procedure in a given area under Title V of the TEU or under the TFEU requires the consent of Parliament. It notes the introduction of an 'exit clause' for the Member States and underlines that the agreement laying down the arrangements for the withdrawal of a Member State from the Union may not be concluded until after Parliament has given its consent. The Parliament’s consent will also be required for a wide range of international agreements signed by the Union. The Parliament urges that any future ‘mixed’ agreement combining non-CFSP and CFSP elements must normally be dealt with under a single legal basis, which should be the one directly related to the main subject matter of the agreement. It notes that Parliament will have the right to be consulted, except where the agreement relates exclusively to the CFSP.
New powers of scrutiny : the Parliament welcomes the fact that the President of the Commission will be elected by Parliament, on a proposal of the European Council, taking into account the elections to the European Parliament. It also welcomes the fact that the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, together with the other members of the Commission, as a body, will be subject to a vote of consent by Parliament, as well as to a vote of censure, and will therefore be accountable to Parliament. It underlines the need for transparency and democratic scrutiny concerning the setting-up of the European External Action Service (EEAS). There is also a need for transparency and democratic scrutiny concerning the European Defence Agency (EDA). Europol and Eurojust, will also be subject to greater parliamentary scrutiny.
New rights to be informed : the President of the European Council should keep Parliament fully informed about the preparations for European Council meetings and to give a report on the results of meetings, where possible within two working days (if necessary to a special sitting of Parliament). It should also be informed about the Presidency programmes and about the results achieved; the Union’s external action; the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements.
New rights of initiative : the Parliament welcomes its new role in initiating amendments to the Treaties. It welcomes the fact that it will have the right of initiative as regards proposals concerning its own composition, respecting the principles laid down in the Treaties. It notes that Treaty of Lisbon introduces a special legislative procedure for the adoption of provisions laying down the modalities and powers of temporary committees of inquiry.
3. New procedures :
Scrutiny by national parliaments : the Parliament welcomes the new rights conferred on national parliaments with regard to prior scrutiny of application of the principle of subsidiarity in all legislation of the Union. It takes the view that strengthening the scrutiny of European policies by national parliaments will also raise public awareness of the Union's activities. It stresses that the national parliaments' new prerogatives have to be fully respected as from the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon.
Delegated acts : the Parliament appreciates the improvements flowing from the new provisions on legal acts and the hierarchy of norms, in particular the creation of the delegated act, which makes it possible to delegate to the Commission the power to adopt non-legislative acts of general application or to amend non-essential elements of a legislative act. It welcomes in particular the provisions of Article 290(2) of the TFEU, which envisages Parliament (and the Council) having the right both to revoke the delegation of powers and to object to individual delegated acts.
Implementing acts : the resolution notes that the Treaty of Lisbon repeals the current Article 202 of the EC Treaty concerning implementing powers and introduces in Article 291 of the TFEU a new procedure – 'implementing acts' – that provides for the possibility of conferring implementing powers on the Commission in cases where 'uniform conditions for implementing legally binding Union acts' are needed. The resolution also highlights that the Treaty of Lisbon no longer provides a basis for the present comitology procedures and that pending legislative proposals which are not adopted before its entry into force must be modified. However, the Parliament is of the opinion that an interim solution could be negotiated with the Council for the initial period, so that no obstacle would occur as a result of a possible legal void and the new regulation could be adopted by the legislator after due consideration of the Commission proposals.
4. Priorities for the transition period : the Parliament asks the Commission to transmit to the co-legislators all pending proposals in respect of which new legal bases and changes in the legislative procedures apply. It points out that Parliament will decide what position it takes regarding opinions that have already been adopted in consultation procedures on matters which henceforth are to be dealt with under the ordinary legislative procedure, whether this involves confirmation of its previous position or the adoption of a new one. It stresses that any confirmation of opinions as Parliament's position at first reading can be voted on by Parliament only after the Lisbon Treaty has entered into force.
It insists on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement precluding the adoption of pending 'third pillar' legislative proposals having a fundamental rights dimension until the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, so that full judicial scrutiny will be possible in respect of such matters, while measures having no impact, or only a limited impact, on fundamental rights can still be adopted prior to its entry into force.
5. Proposals : the Parliament calls on the other institutions to enter into negotiations for an interinstitutional agreement covering:
the main objectives to be achieved by the European Union after 2009, e.g. in the form of a framework agreement between the three political institutions on a work programme for the parliamentary and Commission term starting in 2009; the implementing measures to be adopted in order to make the new Treaty a success for the institutions and for citizens of the Union; an update of the interinstitutional agreement between Parliament and the Council defining their working relations concerning foreign policy, including the sharing of confidential information.
The Parliament calls on the Council and the Commission to consider the negotiation with Parliament of a new interinstitutional agreement providing Parliament with a substantive definition of its involvement in every stage leading to the conclusion of an international agreement. It also calls for the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management to be reviewed.
The Parliament considers that all necessary steps should be taken to create a European information and communication policy . The Commission is called upon to rapidly present an initiative for implementation of the 'citizens' initiative', laying down clear, simple and user-friendly conditions for the exercise of this citizens' right. Regulations on good administration should be adopted with the aim of establishing a common system of administrative law governing the European administration.
The resolution notes that the Treaty of Lisbon allows for the inclusion of the European Development Fund in the budget of the Union , which will enhance the democratic legitimacy of an important part of the EU’s development policy.
Lastly, the Parliament calls on the Commission and the Council to agree with Parliament on a strategy aimed at ensuring coherence between legislation adopted and the Charter of Fundamental Rights as well as the rules contained in the Treaties on policies such as preventing discrimination, protecting asylum seekers, improving transparency, data protection, the rights of minorities and the rights of victims and suspects.
The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the report drawn up by Jo LEINEN (PES, DE) on Parliament's new role and responsibilities in implementing the Treaty of Lisbon.
1. New policies
New objectives and horizontal clauses : the Charter of Fundamental Rights, representative and participatory democracy and gender equality have all been included in the Union’s values and aims and have been given a prominent position. Members also welcome the introduction of horizontal provisions on a high level of employment, social protection, the fight against social exclusion, a high level of education, training and protection of human health, combating discrimination, and environmental protection. Consumer protection has been strengthened to the extent that it is to be mainstreamed into the other Union policies to be laid down and implemented, and, as a cross-cutting task, now occupies a much more prominent place. New legal bases : MEPs underline that the broadening of the Union's external action under the Lisbon Treaty, including the provision of new legal bases and instruments affecting areas related to foreign policy (external action and the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP)/Common Security and Defence Policy), necessitates a new interinstitutional balance guaranteeing adequate democratic scrutiny by Parliament. The new Treaty also provides for new legal bases in the following areas: energy : energy matters will now be covered by a separate Title XXI in Part Three of the TFEU and that action in that field will thus have a legal basis; space : MEPs stress their satisfaction at the insertion of a provision on a European space policy and welcome the opportunity given to Parliament and to the Council to adopt, under the ordinary legislative procedure, the necessary measures establishing a European space programme; intellectual property rights : the Treaty of Lisbon includes a new legal basis providing for codecision in respect of intellectual property rights; finance : the legal basis for the adoption of European Union measures in the fields of the prevention of and fight against fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union will be strengthened; criminal matters : MEPs point out that the new Treaty provisions concerning judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters include a legal basis for the adoption of measures to support the training of the judiciary and judicial staff. The Treaty of Lisbon also provides for the possible establishment of a European Public Prosecutor's Office in order to combat crimes affecting the financial interests of the Union; child protection : binding provisions for the protection of the rights of the child in the internal and external objectives of the European Union have been introduced; tourism and sport : this has been included as a new title in the Lisbon Treaty. Therefore, the Union can finally take action for the development of sport and its European dimension and can take due account of the specific nature of sport when applying other European policies.
2. New powers for the European Parliament : overall, the report welcomes the fact that, with a few exceptions, the new Treaty would place the European Parliament on an equal footing with the Council as a lawmaker in areas where this has not been case so far, notably in setting the EU budget (the European Parliament would enjoy full parity), agriculture policy and justice and home affairs . On this last issue, the area of freedom, security and justice is fully integrated into the TFEU, formally putting an end to the third pillar.
MEPs believe that the responsibility of the European Central Bank to report on monetary policy is now greater, since the ECB is recognised as an institution of the European Union. They welcome the fact that several provisions of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) and of the ECB can be modified after consulting Parliament.
Concerning the implementation of the Structural Funds , the Lisbon Treaty places Parliament on an equal footing with the Council by replacing the current assent procedure by the ordinary legislative procedure. Legislation prohibiting discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation will become subject to a special legislative procedure and will require Parliament’s consent.
MEPs welcome the fact that codecision will henceforth apply to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, inasmuch as this will allow Parliament to take part on an equal footing with the Council in the adjustment of those regulations.
New budgetary powers : the report notes that the Treaty of Lisbon makes sweeping changes in the area of the Union’s finances, particularly as regards interinstitutional relations and decision-making procedures. The Council and Parliament must agree, within the limits of own resources, on the programming of expenditure which becomes legally binding. MEPs welcome the fact that the budget as a whole must be adopted jointly by Parliament and the Council, in compliance with the multiannual financial framework and they welcome the abolition of the distinction between compulsory and non-compulsory expenditure . New consent procedure : MEPs welcome the fact that the simplified revision procedure with regard to the introduction of qualified majority voting and the introduction of the ordinary legislative procedure in a given area under Title V of the TEU or under the TFEU requires the consent of Parliament. They note the introduction of an 'exit clause' for the Member States and underline that the agreement laying down the arrangements for the withdrawal of a Member State from the Union may not be concluded until after Parliament has given its consent. The Parliament’s consent will also be required for a wide range of international agreements signed by the Union. MEPs urge that any future ‘mixed’ agreement combining non-CFSP and CFSP elements must normally be dealt with under a single legal basis, which should be the one directly related to the main subject matter of the agreement; notes that Parliament will have the right to be consulted, except where the agreement relates exclusively to the CFSP. New powers of scrutiny : MEPs welcome the fact that the President of the Commission will be elected by Parliament, on a proposal of the European Council, taking into account the elections to the European Parliament. They also welcome the fact that the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, together with the other members of the Commission, as a body, will be subject to a vote of consent by Parliament, as well as to a vote of censure, and will therefore be accountable to Parliament. They underline the need for transparency and democratic scrutiny concerning the setting-up of the European External Action Service (EEAS). There is also a need for transparency and democratic scrutiny concerning the European Defence Agency (EDA). Europol and Eurojust, will also be subject to greater parliamentary scrutiny. New rights to be informed : the President of the European Council should keep Parliament fully informed about the preparations for European Council meetings and to give a report on the results of meetings, where possible within two working days (if necessary to a special sitting of Parliament). It should also be informed about the Presidency programmes and about the results achieved; the Union’s external action; the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements. New rights of initiative : MEPs welcome Parliament's new role in initiating amendments to the Treaties. They welcome the fact that Parliament will have the right of initiative as regards proposals concerning its own composition, respecting the principles laid down in the Treaties. They note that Treaty of Lisbon introduces a special legislative procedure for the adoption of provisions laying down the modalities and powers of temporary committees of inquiry.
3. New procedures :
Scrutiny by national parliaments : MEPs welcome the new rights conferred on national parliaments with regard to prior scrutiny of application of the principle of subsidiarity in all legislation of the Union. They take the view that strengthening the scrutiny of European policies by national parliaments will also raise public awareness of the Union's activities. They stress that the national parliaments' new prerogatives have to be fully respected as from the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon. Delegated acts : MEPs appreciate the improvements flowing from the new provisions on legal acts and the hierarchy of norms, in particular the creation of the delegated act, which makes it possible to delegate to the Commission the power to adopt non-legislative acts of general application or to amend non-essential elements of a legislative act. They welcome in particular the provisions of Article 290(2) of the TFEU, which envisages Parliament (and the Council) having the right both to revoke the delegation of powers and to object to individual delegated acts. Implementing acts : the report notes that the Treaty of Lisbon repeals the current Article 202 of the EC Treaty concerning implementing powers and introduces in Article 291 of the TFEU a new procedure – 'implementing acts' – that provides for the possibility of conferring implementing powers on the Commission in cases where 'uniform conditions for implementing legally binding Union acts' are needed. The report also highlights that the Treaty of Lisbon no longer provides a basis for the present comitology procedures and that pending legislative proposals which are not adopted before its entry into force must be modified. However, MEPs are of the opinion that an interim solution could be negotiated with the Council for the initial period, so that no obstacle would occur as a result of a possible legal void and the new regulation could be adopted by the legislator after due consideration of the Commission proposals.
4. Priorities for the transition period : MEPs ask the Commission to transmit to the co-legislators all pending proposals in respect of which new legal bases and changes in the legislative procedures apply. They point out that Parliament will decide what position it takes regarding opinions that have already been adopted in consultation procedures on matters which henceforth are to be dealt with under the ordinary legislative procedure, whether this involves confirmation of its previous position or the adoption of a new one. They stress that any confirmation of opinions as Parliament's position at first reading can be voted on by Parliament only after the Lisbon Treaty has entered into force.
They insist on the conclusion of an interinstitutional agreement precluding the adoption of pending 'third pillar' legislative proposals having a fundamental rights dimension until the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, so that full judicial scrutiny will be possible in respect of such matters, while measures having no impact, or only a limited impact, on fundamental rights can still be adopted prior to its entry into force.
5. Proposals : MEPs call on the other institutions to enter into negotiations for an interinstitutional agreement covering: (i) the main objectives to be achieved by the European Union after 2009, e.g. in the form of a framework agreement between the three political institutions on a work programme for the parliamentary and Commission term starting in 2009; (ii) the implementing measures to be adopted in order to make the new Treaty a success for the institutions and for citizens of the Union; (iii) requests an update of the interinstitutional agreement between Parliament and the Council defining their working relations concerning foreign policy, including the sharing of confidential information.
MEPs call on the Council and the Commission to consider the negotiation with Parliament of a new interinstitutional agreement providing Parliament with a substantive definition of its involvement in every stage leading to the conclusion of an international agreement. They also call for the Interinstitutional Agreement on budgetary discipline and sound financial management to be reviewed.
MEPs consider that all necessary steps should be taken to create a European information and communication policy . The Commission is called upon to rapidly present an initiative for implementation of the 'citizens' initiative', laying down clear, simple and user-friendly conditions for the exercise of this citizens' right. Regulations on good administration should be adopted with the aim of establishing a common system of administrative law governing the European administration.
The report notes that the Treaty of Lisbon allows for the inclusion of the European Development Fund in the budget of the Union , which will enhance the democratic legitimacy of an important part of the EU’s development policy.
Lastly, MEPs call on the Commission and the Council to agree with Parliament on a strategy aimed at ensuring coherence between legislation adopted and the Charter of Fundamental Rights as well as the rules contained in the Treaties on policies such as preventing discrimination, protecting asylum seekers, improving transparency, data protection, the rights of minorities and the rights of victims and suspects.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3564
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T6-0373/2009
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0145/2009
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A6-0145/2009
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE420.128
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE420.046
- Committee opinion: PE405.918
- Committee opinion: PE406.164
- Committee draft report: PE407.780
- Committee opinion: PE404.770
- Committee opinion: PE404.806
- Committee opinion: PE405.737
- Committee opinion: PE404.819
- Committee opinion: PE405.806
- Committee opinion: PE404.556
- Committee opinion: PE404.729
- Committee opinion: PE404.795
- Committee opinion: PE405.973
- Committee opinion: PE404.685
- Committee opinion: PE405.719
- Committee opinion: PE404.663
- Committee opinion: PE404.701
- Committee opinion: PE404.787
- Committee opinion: PE404.663
- Committee opinion: PE404.701
- Committee opinion: PE404.787
- Committee opinion: PE404.685
- Committee opinion: PE405.719
- Committee opinion: PE404.729
- Committee opinion: PE404.795
- Committee opinion: PE405.973
- Committee opinion: PE404.556
- Committee opinion: PE404.819
- Committee opinion: PE405.806
- Committee opinion: PE404.770
- Committee opinion: PE404.806
- Committee opinion: PE405.737
- Committee draft report: PE407.780
- Committee opinion: PE406.164
- Committee opinion: PE405.918
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE420.046
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE420.128
- Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading: A6-0145/2009
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2009)3564
Activities
- Gérard ONESTA
- Proinsias DE ROSSA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jo LEINEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hans-Peter MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
Amendments | Dossier |
264 |
2008/2063(INI)
2008/04/17
REGI
20 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that, as regards economic, social and territorial cohesion, the Lisbon Treaty puts the European Parliament on an equal footing with the Council by replacing the assent procedure which currently applies to implementation of the Structural Funds by the so-called ordinary legislative procedure, the co- decision procedure, significantly increasing Parliament's legislative powers and the competence of the Committee on Regional Development and thus enhancing transparency and increasing Parliament's accountability to citizens; is, however, opposed to the premature discussion of the European Parliament's new role vis-à- vis the Lisbon Treaty, which has not yet been ratified.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Stresses that pursuing the objective of territorial cohesion should not lead to an increase in the support provided for the achievement of other EU objectives; emphasises that cohesion policy constitutes an objective in itself and that the tendency to increase the scope of that objective, due to its horizontal nature, weakens rather than strengthens the concept and the EU's ability to achieve the objective;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3b (new) 3b. Reiterates that addressing disparities between the more prosperous and the least developed regions remains the objective of cohesion policy; emphasises that the inclusion of the objective of territorial cohesion complements this primary objective;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes positively that the Lisbon Treaty
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes positively that the special status of the outermost regions is confirmed by Article 349 and by specific provisions concerning state aid.
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Notes positively that the special status of the outermost regions is confirmed
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Firmly believes that the changes in the budgetary procedure, notably the convening of the conciliation committee in the event of Parliament adopting amendments at first reading, will necessitate strengthened
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. ;Welcomes the extension of the principle of subsidiarity, especially with regard of subsidiarity, especially with regard to local and regional authorities, and to local and regional authorities, and the inclusion of the 'early warning the inclusion of the 'early warning mechanism' that should enable national mechanism' that should enable national parliaments to better assess the parliaments to better assess the consistency of Community legislative consistency of Community legislative proposals with the principles of proposals with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality; draws subsidiarity and proportionality; draws attention, in this connection, to the attention, in this connection, to the need to strengthen relations between need to strengthen relations between the Committee on Regional the Committee on Regional Development and national parliaments; Development and national parliaments, believes in this regard that the via the development or consolidation involvement of local and regional of specific channels of authorities and parliaments in relation communication; believes in this regard to subsidiarity could be an important that the involvement of local and element and recalls that such regional authorities and parliaments in relation to subsidiarity could be an important element and recalls that such involvement depends on national provisions;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the extension of the principle of subsidiarity, especially with regard to local and regional authorities, and the inclusion of the 'early warning mechanism' that should enable national parliaments to better assess the consistency of Community legislative proposals with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality; draws attention, in this connection, to the need to strengthen relations between the Committee on Regional Development
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7a (new) 7a. Notes positively that the shared values of the Union as regards services of general economic interest laid down in the Protocol on services of general interest, include in particular: – the essential role and the wide discretion of national, regional and local authorities in providing, commissioning and organising services of general economic interest as closely as possible to the needs of the users; – the diversity between various services of general economic interest and the differences in the needs and preferences of users that may result from different geographical, social or cultural situations; – a high level of quality, safety and affordability, equal treatment and the promotion of universal access and of user rights.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7a (new) 7a. Points out that the new proclamation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights places emphasis on regional authorities and on balanced, stable development of Europe's regions; considers in this connection that the Committee on Regional Development is required as it pursues its activities to comply with the provisions of the Charter and to place men and women at the centre ;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that, as regards economic, social and territorial cohesion, the Lisbon Treaty puts the European Parliament on an equal footing with the Council by replacing the assent procedure, which
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9a (new) 9a. Calls, with a view to enabling local and regional communities better to understand the changes brought in by the Lisbon Treaty, for the publication, at the earliest opportunity, of consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union including the changes.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Believes that the inclusion of territorial cohesion as an objective of the Union complements the objectives of economic and social cohesion and will increase the competence of Parliament and of the Committee on Regional Development to assess the territorial impact of key EU policies; emphasises the importance of the introduction of shared competence for the EU and Members States in the field of territorial cohesion and, in order to make rapid progress towards achieving this objective, recommends that the Committee on Regional Development
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Council and Commission to define more precisely, together with Parliament, the objective of territorial cohesion and
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Council and Commission to define more precisely, together with Parliament, the objective of territorial cohesion a
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Council and Commission to define more precisely, together with Parliament, the objective of territorial cohesion and, bearing in mind that definition, take better account of the territorial impact of all EU policies having a strong territorial dimension; notes the important role that the Committee on Regional Development will play in defining this objective and in creating a strong synergy between territorial cohesion and the main financing programmes;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Council and Commission to define more precisely, together with Parliament, the objective of territorial cohesion and, bearing in mind that definition, take better account without further delay of the territorial impact of all EU policies having a strong territorial dimension; notes the important role that the Committee on Regional Development will play in defining this objective;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Calls on the Council and Commission to define
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3a (new) 3a. Urges the Member States to demonstrate the necessary political will to incorporate the objective of territorial cohesion in national legislation;
source: PE-405.747
2008/05/07
EMPL
41 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Recital A A. Whereas, with a view to preparing a report on
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that the European Parliament is the only democratically elected representation of European citizens;
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Welcomes the amendment to Article 149 of the EC Treaty to extend the scope of EU action in the youth field to include encouraging the participation of young people in democratic life in Europe and, with a view to better involving young citizens in public life, stresses the importance of EU initiatives and development of policies that promote and facilitate the active participation of young people in democratic life at all levels;
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that the current geopolitical, economic and social situation, and the drawing-up of a strategy and action plan for the preservation and sustainable development of the oceans and seas in Europe and the world (European Maritime Policy), justify increased decision-making power for the European Parliament with regard to the CFP;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Underlines that Parliament's specialised committees should be adequately involved in the ongoing discussions on the future comitology regime under the Lisbon Treaty, in order to facilitate a smooth transition from the current system to the future provisions; considers that the parliamentary control of delegated acts and implementing acts must be guaranteed;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses that the new Treaty will apply to all legislative proposals that are under way at the moment of its coming into force;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Underlines, in addition, the importance of the horizontal social clause in Article 9 of the Treaty on European Union, as amended, which will act as a general principle of the European Union's policy making;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes, in particular, Article 16 of the EC Treaty, as amended, and the Protocol to the Treaty of Lisbon on Services of General Interest, which provide a clear legal basis for the definition of Member States’ responsibilities as regards the provision of universal accessible and high-quality public services to citizens;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Points out that the only change introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon to the three legislative procedures referred to will be that as regards their adoption, voting in the Council will take place on the basis of qualified majority rather than unanimity, subject to the procedure provided for in Article 48 of the EC Treaty as amended
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Points out that the only change introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon to the three legislative procedures referred to will be that as regards their adoption, voting in the Council will take place on the basis of qualified majority rather than unanimity, subject to the procedure provided for in Article 48 of the EC Treaty as amended; anticipates no particular difficulty with the change of voting majority in the Council as regards those dossiers.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out, as regards the question concerning the political priorities of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs priorities with regard to the use of Parliament's
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that, in this new scenario, it is no longer possible to evade the need to revise and update the powers of the Committee on Fisheries defined in Annex VI to its Rules of Procedure, powers which date from the setting-up of the Committee on Fisheries in 1994 and which survived the major reform of the common fisheries policy in 2002, as well as two changes of title and consequent internal restructuring of the Commission's former Directorate-General for Fisheries to match the new circumstances as regards fisheries management at world level;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Reaffirms the principles and points endorsed by Parliament in its resolution of 10 April 2008 on a European agenda for culture in a globalising world1 regarding the inclusion of culture on the Lisbon agenda in connection with the Commission communication on that subject to the European Parliament, the Council, the Committee of the Regions, and the European Economic and Social Committee; _______________ 1 P6_TA(2008)0124.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Considers, therefore, that the use of Parliament's
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Regrets that the objectives of the CAP
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Bases this request to update the powers of the Committee on Fisheries on the fact that, among the major changes that have affected the evolution of the CFP in addition to the above-mentioned 2002 reform, we have seen successive alterations in the funds allocated to fisheries since they were taken out of the Community structural funds chapter, fisheries agreements have evolved into fisheries partnership agreements, regional fisheries management organisations have become more prominent and the European Union is playing a growing role within them, trade in fish products has changed profoundly, new technologies are being applied in fisheries and there has been a change in the objective of Community fisheries management, which must henceforth be carried out using an ecosystem approach as part of the new integrated maritime policy approved for the European Union;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Expresses its satisfaction that the TFEU has conserved the horizontal approach taken by Article 151(4) of the EC Treaty, stipulating that ‘the Community shall take cultural aspects into account in its action under other provisions of this Treaty, in particular in order to respect and to promote the diversity of its cultures'; regrets that the principles of multiculturalism have not been properly set out, since this is the basis for measures to conserve the cultural wealth and diversity of the European Union;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, which the Court of Justice of the European Communities, in recent judgments, has interpreted unfavourably as regards employment rights, will remain unchanged if the Lisbon Treaty comes into effect;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Regrets that the objectives of the CAP (Article 33 and 34 of the EC Treaty) were not
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Stresses that it is inconsistent that a parliamentary committee with codecision powers should continue to be a neutralised committee and recommends, consequently, that the necessary changes be made to avoid this situation;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers that this horizontal approach to culture in the spirit of the new horizontal clauses introduced by the TFEU, regarding the social dimension of the single market, sustainable development and measures to combat all forms of discrimination, i
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Regrets that the Lisbon Treaty will not amend Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty as they undermine workers’ rights and encourage a race to the bottom in terms of pay and conditions;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Regrets that the wording of Article 37(3) gives the impression that certain measures which were previously covered by the consultation procedure could now be taken by the Council alone without even consulting Parliament;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Notes that environmental protection is generally a matter of shared competence; calls, therefore, for clarification of the term "marine biological resources" and of the circumstances in which their conservation is "under the common fisheries policy", in order that the scope of the exclusive competence may be better identified;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that every necessary step should be taken to bring about a European information and communication policy and renews its call for an interinstitutional agreement laying down common principles to govern cooperation among the European institutions in this area;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Supports the call by the European Trade Union Confederation for a ‘social progress clause’ to be inserted into the EC Treaty in order to ensure the primacy of social rights over those relating to the functioning of the internal market;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Considers that such programmes of action should highlight the specific nature of culture in Europe, on the one hand establishing it both as a way to foster identity, mutual understanding, and citizenship and as a driving force behind European integration and, on the other, defining its rightful place at international level;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Expresses its concern that the addition of the words "particularly economic and financial conditions" in Article 16 EC Treaty, as amended, will be interpreted in such a way as to place further restrictions on the ability of governments to invest in public services;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Calls for it not to be possible for the measures referred to in Article 37(3) to be taken by the Council alone without consulting Parliament;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Considers it vital, likewise, for the Committee on Fisheries to participate as an observer in the joint committees provided for in fisheries agreements, as Parliament has requested on many occasions, and calls for this condition to be reflected in the interinstitutional agreement;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. In view of the major innovation introduced by the TFEU enabling national parliaments to guarantee the correct allocation of responsibilities between the European Union and its Member States
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Is of the opinion that no existing Council act could have been adopted on the basis of Article 37(3), and therefore considers that paragraph's scope and possible application not to be
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. In view of the major innovation introduced by the TFEU enabling national parliaments to guarantee the correct allocation of responsibilities between the European Union and its Member States under the principle of subsidiarity, urges national parliaments to adjust, if necessary, their timetables and working methods to ensure conformity with the principle of subsidiarity in considering all EU legislative proposals relating to culture, the audiovisual sector, education, youth and sport, taking into account, where applicable, the regional and local dimension of the measures proposed;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses, however, that the Treaty of Lisbon provides for further progress on social Europe and for strengthened social legislation on the basis of the binding character of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, whilst noting that some Member States have ‘opt-outs’ from the binding nature of the Charter, and of a more systematic definition, in Articles 2 and 3 of the Treaty on European Union, as amended, of the values underpinning the European Union's actions and main aims;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Notes that the comitology procedures adopted on the basis of Article 202 of the EC Treaty will be repealed; emphasises the key role that Parliament has to play with regard to Article 249C in formulating a new comitology framework (i.e. by adopting acts in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure), especially with regard to the role of committees in the field of agriculture; stresses, therefore, the need to ensure that the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development is represented in the interinstitutional negotiations that will formulate the new comitology framework;
source: PE-406.013
2008/05/08
INTA
21 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes the introduction under Article 189 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union of a legal basis for the space sector and the formulation of a European space programme under the ordinary legislative procedure;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Notes that with respect to ‘delegated acts’ the Parliament will have considerable powers, which could go as far as objecting to the entry into force of the delegated act in question, if the main co-decided act so provides;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Considers that uniform conditions for implementing legislative acts in the CCP require the legislative acts to confer implementing powers on the Commission for adopting ‘implementing acts’, in accordance with Article 249 C TFEU; therefore urges Parliament and Council to adopt, before the entry into force of the Treaty, a regulation laying down the rules and general principles on implementing acts, including mechanisms for control of these powers by the Member States;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Considers that uniform conditions for implementing legislative acts in the CCP require the legislative acts to confer implementing powers on the Commission for adopting ‘implementing acts’, in accordance with Article 249 C TFEU; therefore urges
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Stresses that this regulation should call on the Commission to refrain from making substantive changes to basic legislative acts, or from adding details affecting the political will expressed in basic legislative acts, when adopting implementing legislation in the CCP;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Calls on the Council to invite Parliament’s representatives to participate in all Coreper II meetings that deal with matters falling within the scope of the ordinary legislative procedure;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Urges the future High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to consider with Parliament adequate methods of keeping Parliament fully informed of and consulted on the Union’s external action; to further this aim, regular joint meetings between the group of External Relations Commissioners (chaired by the HR/VP) with delegations from the relevant Parliament Committees as well as regular joint meetings between the Council’s working groups, Coreper, PSC, the Article 188C-Committee, and the European Commission with Parliament’s rapporteurs and delegations should become normal practice;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Regards the maintenance of a separate area of activity for trade policy within the College of Commissioners as essential to do justice to the CCP’s importance;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Notes that all matters falling under the CCP (Part V, Title II TFEU) will come within the exclusive competence of the Union, including trade in goods, services, commercial aspects of intellectual property and foreign direct investment, which means that they will be ‘Union agreements’ and that there will be no more mixed trade agreements concluded by both the Union and the Member States;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Therefore invites the
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses the explicit requirement that the CCP shall serve the principles and objectives of the Union's external action, inter alia, the safeguard of its values and fundamental interests, the support of democracy and the rule of law, and the promotion of sustainable development and of good global governance; underlines the need to guarantee consistency and mutual supportiveness among the various aspects of the external action of the EU;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Notes that space launch services and the necessary infrastructures constitute transport activities which should as such be covered by Title VI of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and should be the responsibility of Parliament’s Committee on Transport and Tourism; calls for Commission initiatives relating to this specific segment of the space sector to be taken explicitly on this legal basis;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Strongly supports the effective promotion of non-trade concerns, such as the observance of environmental, social and food safety standards, through the pursuit of the CCP at the bilateral, interregional and multilateral level;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Draws the attention of the Commission and the Union legislator (the European Parliament and the Council) to the need to adapt the legislative procedure to the provisions of Protocol 2 of the Treaty of Lisbon on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality; considers in particular that the Commission should inform Parliament of the nature of consultations carried out before proposing legislative acts in accordance with Article 2 of the above Protocol and of the opinions issued by the national parliaments under Article 7(2) and (3) thereof; adds that Parliament should envisage the inclusion in its future regulation of provisions authorising dialogue and cooperation with the national parliaments in accordance with the procedures they wish to follow and without prejudice to their total freedom of deliberation.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that, with regard to the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements under the CCP, the Commission will be under a legal obligation to inform Parliament of the progress of negotiations on a par with the special ‘Committee referred to in Article 188 N of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU)’ of the Council; calls for this information to be provided to the same extent and at the same time as in the relevant Council committee under that Article;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Considers though that the Parliament is entitled to establish preconditions in order to give its consent, which will be required for the conclusion of all trade agreements; stresses therefore the need for a reinforced Framework Agreement, in particular paragraph 19 thereof, on relations between Parliament and the Commission;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Sees a need for multilateral and bilateral trade negotiations to be attended by representatives of Parliament, to be able to take the concluding decision; therefore calls for ensuring appropriate participation by its Members in the framework for the agreement on relations between Parliament and the Commission;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Asks for the inclusion of specific paragraphs in such a renewed Framework Agreement that call on the Commission: a. to react to the preconditions Parliament may set for giving its consent to the conclusion of a trade agreement before effectively starting the negotiations; b. to provide Parliament with all the necessary information relating to the CCP and the negotiation of commercial agreements or the negotiation of the commercial components of any agreement, including all proposals and draft proposals for negotiating mandates and/or directives, in sufficient time for Parliament to be able to express its views and for the Commission to be able to take due account of those views; c. with regard to the transparency of operations of the Article 188 N TFEU Committee, to make available all documents to the Parliament’s relevant Committee; d. to include an observer delegation from the Parliament in any negotiation on commercial agreements or commercial components of any other international agreement;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Points out that, according to Article 188 C (2) TFEU, Parliament and Council will be co-legislators on an equal footing when determining the framework for implementing the Common Commercial Policy (CCP), which may include both policy and technical aspects of the CCP;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Considers that the wording ‘measures defining the framework for implementing the common commercial policy’ in Article 188 C (2) TFEU implies that the essential elements of the CCP will be included in legislative acts adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure, and that non- essential elements of these acts may be amended or supplemented by the Commission in the form of ‘delegated acts’, if so stated in the basic legislative act, in accordance with Article 249 B TFEU;
source: PE-406.002
2008/05/13
ENVI
9 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Welcomes the fact that the European Union will be able to take more effective action in pursuit of environmental protection objectives, with the Lisbon Treaty making it possible to bring new market-based instruments to bear in response to environmental policy Requirements, such as eco-taxes, expansion of the emission trading scheme, environmental charges and grants.
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the fact that the Environment has been given such a prominent position in all EU policies in the Treaty of Lisbon including the explicit reference to
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Underlines therefore that it is a matter of priority for the
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes with satisfaction that the European Union's power is strengthened considerably in the field of public health by way of references to health services in cross- border areas, measures related to the protection of public health regarding tobacco and the abuse of alcohol, and on monitoring, early warning of and combating serious cross-border threats to health, excluding harmonisation of laws and regulations, as well as measures related to medicinal products and devices for medical use. Welcomes specific references to initiatives aimed at establishing guidelines and indicators, organising the exchange of best practices and preparing the necessary elements for periodic monitoring and evaluation, concerning which the European Parliament is to be kept fully informed. Welcomes the fact that public health policies can clearly be pursued more effectively under the new Treaty.
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Points out that in view of the increased focus in the area of health services, trans- frontier diseases
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Welcomes the fact that the Treaty adds a new title on energy (Title XX), whose objectives include the promotion of energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy sources, in the context of the need to protect and improve the environment;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that the clarification of the Union's powers in the policy field relating to the environment, public health and consumer protection entails visible benefits for the citizens of Europe, since it reinforces the promotion of sustainable development in the Union, health policies and environmental protection;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Deplores the European Union's failure to make adequate progress as regards public health, trafficking in organs and guaranteeing and promoting access to health services, in particular highly specialised cancer services for women;
source: PE-406.035
2008/05/14
FEMM
6 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Regrets that there are no binding measures for the equal representation of women and men in the European Commission; calls for a system of nomination of commissioners whereby Member States would propose a woman and a man as nominee Commissioners in 2009 and the President would choose among them with a view to achieving a gender balance;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Welcomes the fact that Articles 9 and 10 of the Lisbon Treaty clearly stipulate that all EU policies have to actively promote social inclusion, social protection, equality between women and men and non-discrimination;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls, consequently, for a dual approach that complements gender mainstreaming in practice, i.e. positive actions as well as clear and binding targets and measures;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes the fact that the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union is given the same legal value as the Treaties (Article 6 of the TEU), which will enable the Union to maintain or adopt measures providing for specific advantages in favour of the under- represented sex and better maternity protection, particularly at work (Articles 23, 33 and 34 of the charter);
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes Declaration 19 on Article 8 of the TFEU calling on the Member States to take all necessary measures to prevent and punish all forms of
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes Declaration 19 on Article 8 of the TFEU calling on the Member States to take all necessary measures to prevent and punish all forms of domestic violence and to support and protect the victims of such violence, as a part of the transposition of the principle of equality between women and men.
source: PE-406.115
2008/05/15
DEVE
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Welcomes the deletion by the Lisbon Treaty of Article 179(3) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, which excludes the European Development Fund (EDF) from the scope of that Treaty; notes that this opens the way for the inclusion of the EDF in the budget of the Union without the need to revise that Treaty; calls on the Council and the Commission to include the EDF in the budget of the EU at the 2008/2009 Mid-term Review, which will enhance the democratic legitimacy of an important part of EU development policy and its budget;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 c (new) 8c. Stresses that only if a high priority is given to Policy Coherence for Development will the Union be able to meet both the development objectives and the values of the EU as stated in the Lisbon Treaty;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 d (new) 8d. Welcomes the prospect of a more streamlined institutional architecture at EU level to coordinate Europe’s external relations policies, but warns that to be truly effective, development policy must be based on partnership and ownership with recipient countries;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4a (new) Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Emphasises that the establishment of the European External Action service (EEAS) will help the Commission to continue and accelerate the reform and simplification of the general directorates responsible for external action
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Insists that, in order to ensure Policy Coherence for Development, there is a continued need for a specific directorate general for development at administrative level, responsible for policy setting, policy advice and policy management of EU development cooperation;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Emphasises that the current practice of splitting up policy formulation, programming and implementation in the field of development cooperation policy should be put to an end, so as to increase the efficiency of the EU's development cooperation
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the need to ensure consistency and integrate development and humanitarian programming for African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries, Asia and Latin America;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Commission to correct the existing inconsistencies in the structure and the competences of its Directorates General, both in terms of policies and budget; calls for the Directorate General for Development to be made responsible for all EU development cooperation, including cooperation with non-ACP developing countries, and for the integration of EuropeAid into the Directorate General for Development;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the extension of the ordinary legislative procedure (co- decision), and stresses that this must mean that Parliament will enjoy a real and effective right of democratic scrutiny over all aspects of EU development cooperation policy;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Welcomes the fact that the Lisbon Treaty introduces binding provisions for the protection of children's rights in the internal and external objectives of the EU;
source: PE-406.043
2008/05/21
IMCO
18 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Article 2 Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Draws attention to the fact that the petitions process, retained in the new Treaty, provides an important facility enabling the people of Europe to become actively involved – either individually or through voluntary associations – with the development of the Union
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Article 3 Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Resolves to ensure that
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Article 4 Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Article 5 5. Stresses, in addition, the importance of taking into account consumer protection requirements across the board in defining and implementing other Union policies
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that it is already open to citizens to request in a petition that Parliament exercise its right under Article 192 of the EC Treaty to call for a legislative initiative and that nothing would prevent citizens, if they chose to do so, from addressing the same call for an European act both to the European Commission, as a citizens' initiative, and to the European Parliament, as a petition;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Article 6 Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Considers that Parliament needs to examine how it could devise appropriate procedures for following and supporting citizens' initiatives, and believes that the Committee on Petitions, which already has broad experience of working with citizens on issues of concern to them, should play a key role in such procedures;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Article 6 a (new) 6a. Expects, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, that the national parliaments assume their responsibility with respect to the social dimension of liberalisation;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the proclamation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the recognition of the rights, freedoms and principles set out in it for all EU citizens; is resolved to clarify with the other institutions the extent to which the Charter is applicable directly to EU citizens – which is what citizens expect to be the case – and also the specific means of redress and non-judicial remedies available to EU citizens who petition Parliament to ensure the correct application of the Charter and its provisions regarding the integrity of the person, and the various rights pertaining to life, human dignity, equality, justice, liberty and private property.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Article 7 Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Welcomes the proclamation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and the recognition of the rights, freedoms and principles set out in it for all EU citizens; is resolved to clarify with the other institutions th
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Article 8 Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that the reinforced status of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as well as the broadening of the scope of the activities which may be the subject of infringement proceedings, notably in the field of justice and home affairs, will have a direct effect on the work of the Committee on Petitions when that Committee is exercising parliamentary control on behalf of citizens;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Article 9 9. Welcomes the consolidation and more specific definition of the principle of subsidiarity and the inclusion of national parliaments in the legislative process
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Notes that the introduction in Article 298 of the TFEU of a legal basis for good administration and the adoption of regulations implementing that Article will answer a long-standing call by the European Ombudsman and the European Parliament for a common system of administrative law governing the European administration, and calls for the Committee on Petitions to be fully involved in the procedure for the adoption of the regulations in question.
source: PE-406.123
2008/05/30
AFET
68 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Underlines that the broadening of the Union's external action under the Lisbon Treaty, including the provision of new legal bases and instruments affecting areas related to foreign policy (external action and CFSP/CSDP), necessitates a new interinstitutional balance and cooperation which would ensure coherence within the Union's external action and guarantee adequate democratic scrutiny by the European Parliament;
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that the Treaty of Lisbon includes a new legal basis providing for codecision in respect of intellectual property rights, in that Article 97a of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TEFU) provides: ‘In the context of the establishment and functioning of the internal market, the European Parliament and the Council, acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, shall establish measures for the creation of European intellectual property rights to provide uniform protection of intellectual property rights throughout the Union and for the setting up of centralised Union- wide authorisation, coordination and supervision arrangements’;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 d (new) 2d. Considers that the European Parliament, among other attributions, will seek to facilitate, through the efforts of its Committee on Foreign Affairs, the consensus among the Member States' national parliaments in what concerns their support for the European Union's external policy initiatives;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges that having a permanent President of the European Council
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Acknowledges that having a permanent President of the European Council may benefit the coherence and continuity of the Union's external action
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Heading before Paragraph 3 Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Insists that the rights of the European Parliament
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Insists that Parliament be fully consulted on the nomination
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Insists that Parliament be fully consulted
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Reiterates that the future office of High Representative/Vice–President of the Commission will derive its legitimacy directly from the European Parliament
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Reiterates that the future office of High Representative/Vice–President of the Commission will derive its legitimacy directly from the European Parliament; therefore invites him/her to build upon the current practice and appear regularly before Parliament in plenary and before its Committee on Foreign Affairs, as well as to participate in meetings, in order to hold regular, systematic and substantive consultations with Parliament and its competent bodies, and to involve Parliament in the decision-making process, thus enhancing the transparency
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Is of the opinion that the debate with the High Representative/Vice–President of the Commission on the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP/CSDP for the coming year constitutes an ideal opportunity to consult Parliament at the beginning of every year, and that a follow–up debate should be scheduled six months thereafter; recommends in this context that a joint meeting of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Conference of Delegation Chairmen and representatives of other competent EP bodies be held for a first exchange of views with the High Representative on the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP/CSDP, followed by a debate in the plenary meeting;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Requests the High Representative's representative chairing the Political and
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Requests that the High Representative's
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regards it as crucial to establish the closest possible collaboration between the President of the European Council, the President of the Commission
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Requests that the High Representative's deputies or representatives and EU Special Representatives (as stipulated by Article 36 of the consolidated Treaty) appear before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, a
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Expects that the establishment of the European External Action Service (EEAS) will provide greater clarity with regard to the criteria for and the appointment and evaluation of EU Special Representatives, including the definition and purpose of their tasks, the length of their mandate
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Underlines the need to facilitate regular contacts between Parliament and the team Presidency o
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 12 12. Underlines the need to facilitate regular contacts between Parliament and the
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Heading before Paragraph 12 Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Regards it as crucial to establish the closest possible collaboration between the President of the European Council, the President of the Commission, the High Representative/Vice–President of the Commission and the rotating Presidency in order that their different functions may contribute at their respective levels to the coherence and efficiency of the CFSP;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Takes the view that the
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 13 13. Takes the view that both the Parliament and the Commission should be present at all Council meetings and related preparatory meetings when external action issues are considered, in order to ensure consistency of the external action of the Union as a whole;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Underlines the need to respect the Charter of Fundamental Rights in all aspects of the Union's external action;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Resolves to put the respect of the principles in article 2, 3 and 21 TEU and the full application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in CFSP as one of its foremost imperatives; charges its responsible committee to monitor that they are effectively adhered to;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Resolves to put the respect of the principles in article 2, 3 and 21 TEU and the full application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in CFSP as one of its foremost imperatives; charges its responsible committee to monitor that they are effectively adhered to;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Regrets the diminution of national sovereignty of member states that the Treaty of Lisbon represents, a shift that many MEPs were elected to oppose, and calls for referenda (where constitutionally possible) across the Union so that the TFEU might be legitimised with a popular mandate – or contrariwise rejected – as the peoples of Europe see fit;
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that both in the formulation and implementation of CFSP, the High Representative/Vice-President of the Commission is not only required to respect the principles enounced in Articles 2, 3 and 21 TEU but also fully respect the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 17. Stresses the need to ensure the democratic accountability and transparency of the activities undertaken by the European Defence Agency, namely by assuring a regular exchange of information between the Chief Executive of EDA and SEDE/AFET and by giving the Chairman of SEDE observer status in the EDA Steering Board;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 18 18. Underlines the need for transparency and democratic scrutiny of the whole process and recalls its right to be consulted on the establishment of the EEAS in accordance with Article 13a(3) of the EU Treaty and to be fully associated with the preparatory work; is of the opinion that the EEAS should administratively be attached to the Commission and refers to its ongoing report on this matter;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 19 Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 19 19.
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes provisions for closer cooperation between the European Parliament and national parliaments under the Lisbon Treaty;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes provisions for closer cooperation between the European Parliament and national parliaments under the Lisbon Treaty; stresses the need to establish closer collaboration between relevant committees of the European and national parliaments, building on the current practice of meetings between the chairs of the foreign affairs, defence and
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes provisions for closer cooperation between the European Parliament and national parliaments under the Lisbon Treaty; stresses the need to establish closer collaboration between relevant committees of the European and national parliaments, building on the current practice of meetings between the chairs of the foreign affairs, defence and European affairs committees of national parliaments and of Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 20 20. Welcomes provisions for closer cooperation between the European Parliament and national parliaments under the Lisbon Treaty; stresses the need to establish closer collaboration between relevant committees of the European and national parliaments, building on the current practice of meetings between the chairs of the foreign affairs, defence and European affairs committees of national parliaments and of Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs, including parliamentary observers from non-EU NATO members together with members of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly; refers to its ongoing report on this matter with the long-term aim to establish a permanent body comprising national and European Parliament Members in order to coordinate and control actions in the field of CFSP;
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 21 21.
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 21 21. Recommends that any future agreement combining non–CFSP and CFSP elements be founded on a single legal basis, which should be directly related to the
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Stresses that both in the formulation and implementation of CFSP, the High Representative/vice-president of the Commission is not only required to respect the principles enounced in Articles 2, 3 and 21 TEU but also fully respect the Charter of Fundamental Rights;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 22 Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 22 22. Demands a larger role for Parliament in international agreements
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 22 22. Demands a larger role for Parliament in international agreements
Amendment 63 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 22 22. Demands a larger role for Parliament in international agreements dealing with foreign policy matters and calls for it to be informed promptly and as fully as possible throughout negotiations for the conclusion thereof;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 22 22. Demands a larger role for Parliament
Amendment 65 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 23 Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 27 a (new) 27a. reminds that the European Parliament is responsible for its own internal organisation and the coherence of its work; will thus keep up the proven practice for the establishment and running of subcommittees under the lead of the Committee for Foreign Affairs;
Amendment 67 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 28 a (new) 28a. Recommends that its Subcommittee on Security and Defence be upgraded and reintegrated in its entirety with the Committee on Foreign Affairs so that the improved coherence within the Council on these matters, and the better synergy between Council and Commission, is fully reflected in Parliament's own organisation;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that the High Representative, in his capacity of Vice- President of the European Commission, as well as Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Council, should: exert, when necessary, a right of initiative in CFSP matters, while securing cooperation with the European Council; initiate measures aiming to the implementation of the decisions related to the field of CFSP/CSDP and act towards their effective implementation in collaboration with the Commission's members and services concerned, assisted by the European External Action Service; seek coordination of the various positions of the Member States involving the support of the President of the European Council;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Expects that the relevant EU Council bodies will directly co-operate with the committees and competent bodies responsible for the CFSP and CSDP from the European Parliament;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 c (new) 2c. Underlines the important role of the President of the European Council in CFSP/CSDP related matters, which will consist in mediating and facilitating the consensus building between the Member States; to this end, stresses that the co- operation between the President of the European Council and the Foreign Affairs Council is indispensable;
source: PE-407.597
2008/06/12
LIBE
12 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 - point a Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 - point d d
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 - point d a (new) da) the drawing up of a Green Paper on European criminal law regarding jurisdiction based on which the European Public Prosecutor may subsequently be established.
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 17 a (new) 17a. The European Parliament welcomes the Trio Presidency assessment that "Coercive measures should be accompanied by corresponding rules to strengthen the rights of the individual, whether a suspect, victim or witness. The possible development of the rights of victims will be examined on the basis of the Commission's assessment of the implementation of the Framework Decision on the Standing of Victims in Criminal Proceedings. After the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon, a proposal for a legal instrument on procedural rights in criminal proceedings will be expected from the Commission or from Member States."
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The future legislative programme of the FSJA should promote measures in the field of police and judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters taking into account the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions which is included in the new Treaty, thus facilitating the transborder cooperation between Member States and aiming towards a future European Penal Law.
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 - point b (b) establishing permanent and deeper relations
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 - point b b) establishing permanent and deeper relations with European and national
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. The multiannual programme for the FSJA should continue to be debated in an annual debate which should focus on the protection of fundamental rights in the European Union, on the implementation of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and on Member States' compliance with the values and principles laid down by the new Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU). It should be based on reports from the Council, the Commission and the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). The European Parliament shares the view of the Trio Council Presidencies1 (FR,CZ,SW) that a "possible review of the mandate of the Agency for Fundamental Rights should be undertaken by December 31st 2009" and that such a review gives the opportunity to deepen the cooperation with the Council of Europe, its Secretary General, its Commissioner for Human Rights and the relevant Parliamentary assembly committees.
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. A more general issue will be how to implement, as far as FSJA-related policies are concerned, the new Treaty provisions on delegated and implementing powers (Article 290 and Article 291, TFEU).
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. In the transitional period Parliament will face several changes in the form and substance of pending legislation. For the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Parliament should maintain its insistence on reaching an inter- institutional agreement on the freezing of the adoption of pending 3rd pillar legislative proposals with a fundamental rights dimension until the entry into force of the new Treaty, so as to allow
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. In the transitional period Parliament
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 16 a (new) 16-A. Where Member States make use of the emergency blockage procedure provided for in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union for penal matters (Articles 82(3) and 83(3)), the chair of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs shall send a message in writing to the European Council expressing the current position reached in its debates.
source: PE-407.857
2009/02/05
AFCO
56 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 – having regard to the Treaty of Lisbon amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, signed on 13 December 2007 and rejected by referendum in Ireland in June 2008,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Welcomes the strengthening of the legal basis for the adoption of EU measures in the fields of the prevention of and fight against fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union (Art
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 26 26. Welcomes the fact that the Treaty of Lisbon has included sport amongst the areas in respect of which a legal basis is laid down (Article 165 of the TFEU); stresses in particular that the Union can
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 29 a (new) 29a. Stresses that any power of the Council to adopt measures pursuant to Article 43(3) of the TFEU is subject to the prior adoption, in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure, of a legislative act pursuant to Article 43(2) of the TFEU, which prescribes the conditions and limitations attaching to the powers conferred on the Council; takes the view that Article 43(3) of the TFEU does not provide for a legal basis or for any autonomous power which would allow the adoption or amendment of any of the Council acts presently in force in the field of the CAP; calls on the Council to refrain from adopting any of the measures referred to in Article 43(3) of the TFEU without prior consultation of Parliament;
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 30 30. Notes that the Treaty of Lisbon introduces far-reaching changes in the decision-making system for the common fisheries policy (CFP) and will also increase its democratic accountability; welcomes the fact that Parliament and the Council will establish, under the ordinary legislative procedure, the necessary rules for achieving the objectives of the CFP (Art. 43(2) of the TFEU); considers, in this respect, that any subject formally included in the annual regulation other than the setting of catch possibilities and the distribution of quotas, such as technical measures or fishing effort, or the incorporation of agreements adopted within the regional fisheries organisations, which have their own legal basis, should be subject to the ordinary legislative procedure;
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 32 32. Believes that
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 33 33. Considers Article 182 of the TFEU to be an improvement because the multiannual framework programme and the implementation of a European research area, referred to therein, will be covered by the ordinary legislative procedure; notes, however, that the specific programmes mentioned in that article will be adopted via
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 34 34. Welcomes the fact that, as regards the implementation of the Structural Funds, the Lisbon Treaty places the European Parliament on an equal footing with the Council by replacing the current assent procedure by the ordinary legislative procedure; considers that this is especially significant as regards the Structural Funds
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 35 35. Notes that legislation prohibiting discrimination based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation will become subject to
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 43 43. Notes the introduction of an ‘exit clause’ for the Member States (Article 50 of the TEU); underlines that the agreement
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 45 45. Urges that any future ‘mixed’ agreement combining non-CFSP and CFSP elements must normally be treated according to a single legal basis, which should be the one directly related to the main subject matter of the agreement; notes that Parliament will have the right to be consulted, except where the agreement relates exclusively to the CFSP;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 5 – having regard to the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, signed in Rome on 29 October 2004 and rejected by referendums in France and in the Netherlands in 2005,
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 47 47. Welcomes the fact that the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy will be subject to a vote of consent by the European Parliament, together with the other members of the Commission, as a body, as well as to a vote of censure, and will therefore be accountable to Parliament;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 49. Underlines the need for transparency and democratic scrutiny concerning the setting-up of the European External Action Service (EEAS) in accordance with Article 27(3) of the TEU, and recalls its right to be consulted on its establishment; insists that this new service must be fully accountable to Parliament; is of the opinion that the EEAS should administratively be attached to the Commission; refers to the reports on the EEAS, drafted by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 49 a (new) 49a. Insists that the College of Commissioners should continue to comprise a Commissioner for development and humanitarian aid in charge of the Union’s development policy and of the directorate-general and services responsible for fixing, advising on and managing the EU’s development cooperation policy, while cooperating closely with the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy in order to ensure consistency in the field of external action in accordance with Article 208(1) of the TFEU;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 51 51. Underlines the need for transparency and democratic scrutiny concerning the
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 53 53. Welcomes the fact that agencies, notably Europol and Eurojust, will be subject to greater parliamentary scrutiny (Articles 85 and 88 of the TFEU); believes, therefore, that the retention of the consultation procedure for the setting-up of joint undertakings in the area of research and technological development (Articles 187 and 188 of the TFEU) may not conform to the spirit of the legal acts of the Union in establishing agencies;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 54 54. Calls on the President of the European Council to keep Parliament fully informed about the preparations for European Council meetings and to give a report on the results of meetings, where possible within two working days (if necessary to a special sitting of Parliament);
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 55 55. Calls on the President of the rotating Council Presidency to inform Parliament committees about the presidency programmes and about the results achieved;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 56 56. Urges the future Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy to agree, with Parliament,
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 61 61. Welcomes the new rights conferred on national parliaments with regard to prior scrutiny of application of the principle of subsidiarity in all legislation of the Union; takes the view that strengthening the scrutiny of European policies by national parliaments will also raise public awareness of the Union’s activities; stresses the need for the European Parliament and national parliaments to prepare for this in a highly efficient way;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 64 a (new) 64a. Welcomes in particular the provisions of Article 290(2) of the TFEU, which envisages Parliament (and the Council) having the right both to revoke the delegation of powers and to object to individual delegated acts;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 11 a (new) Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 74 Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 78 78. Considers that all necessary steps should be taken to create a European information and communication policy, and re
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Subtitle before paragraph 79 Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 79 Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 80 Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 81 Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 82 Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 83 Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 84 Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 85 Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Believes any motion on Parliament’s new role and responsibilities in implementing the Treaty of Lisbon to be premature, pending the approval thereof by the people of Ireland and by the peoples of the other constituent nations of the European Union;
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 86 Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 87 Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 87 a (new) 87a. Urges the Commission to present proposals for legislative acts or other measures in the field of sports as provided for by the ‘White Paper on Sport’;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 88 Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 89 89. Notes that the Treaty of Lisbon allows for the inclusion of the European Development Fund in the budget of the Union; calls on the Council and the Commission to take the necessary steps
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 89 89. Notes that the Treaty of Lisbon allows for the inclusion of the European Development Fund in the budget of the Union, which will enhance the democratic legitimacy of an important part of the EU’s development policy; calls on the Council and the Commission to take the necessary steps for the budget of the European Union at the 2008/2009 mid- term review;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Subtitle before paragraph 90 Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 92 Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 93 Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 94 Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Welcomes the binding character that the Treaty gives to the Charter of Fundamental Rights and welcomes the recognition of the rights, freedoms and principles set out for all EU citizens and residents; underlines that Parliament will be committed to ensuring the full
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 95 Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 95 a (new) 95a. Undertakes to play its part in strengthening the economic governance of the EU with a view to producing a common response to the challenges of globalisation;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 95 a (new) 95a. Calls on the Commission to propose a strategy aimed at developing the Black Sea region with objective of strengthening the security of the south-eastern border of the EU, as well as to ensure an integrated approach and consistency with regard to relations with the former Soviet republics in the Black Sea and Caspian regions (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine);
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 96 Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 96 96. Stresses the need to ensure an integrated approach and consistency, including in the structure and the competences of its directorates-general, in terms of both policies and budget, with regard to development and humanitarian aid programming for African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries, Asia and Latin America; calls for the Directorate- General for Development to be made responsible for all EU development cooperation, including cooperation with non-ACP developing countries, and for the integration of EuropeAid into the Directorate-General for Development;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 97 Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 97 a (new) 97a. Pledges to adapt its internal organisation with a view to optimising and rationalising the exercise of the new powers conferred on it by the Treaty;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Welcomes the fact that the new TFEU links the building of an area of freedom, security and justice to the protection of fundamental rights and the legal order of the EU
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Welcomes the fact that, according to Article 208(1) of the TFEU, the ‘Union’s development cooperation policy and that of the Member States complement and reinforce each other’ whereas, according to the current Article 177(1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community, ‘Community policy in the sphere of development cooperation[...] shall be complementary to the policies pursued by the Member States’; stresses the increased responsibility of Parliament, given that the Union will have a greater role in terms of initiative in policy-setting which should lead to improved donor coordination and division of labour and to greater aid effectiveness for the ‘reduction and, in the long term, the eradication of poverty’
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Also welcomes the fact that consumer protection has been strengthened to the extent that it is to be mainstreamed into the other Union policies to be laid down and implemented, and, as a cross-cutting task, now occupies a much more prominent place by virtue of Article 12 of the TFEU;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Expresses its satisfaction at the insertion of a provision on a European space policy (Article 189 of the TFEU) and welcomes the opportunity given to Parliament and to the Council to adopt, under the ordinary legislative procedure, the necessary measures establishing a European space programme; considers, however, that the words ‘excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the Member States in this field’ which appear in that article may imply some obstacles to the implementation of a common European space policy;
source: PE-420.046
2009/02/11
AFCO
1 amendments...
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Article 94 a (new) 94a. Calls on the Commission and the Council to provide for the establishment of an effective common energy policy with the objective of efficiently coordinating the energy markets of the EU Member States and the development of those markets, whilst integrating external aspects focusing on the sources and routes of energy supply;
source: PE-420.128
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
committees/1 |
Old
New
|
committees/2 |
Old
New
|
committees/3 |
Old
New
|
committees/4 |
Old
New
|
committees/5 |
Old
New
|
committees/6 |
Old
New
|
committees/7 |
Old
New
|
committees/9 |
Old
New
|
committees/10 |
Old
New
|
committees/11 |
Old
New
|
committees/12 |
Old
New
|
committees/13 |
Old
New
|
committees/14 |
Old
New
|
committees/15 |
Old
New
|
committees/16 |
Old
New
|
committees/17 |
Old
New
|
committees/18 |
Old
New
|
committees/19 |
Old
New
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.663&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-AD-404663_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.701&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/FEMM-AD-404701_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.787&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/INTA-AD-404787_EN.html |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.685&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PECH-AD-404685_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.719&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/DEVE-AD-405719_EN.html |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.729&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AD-404729_EN.html |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.795&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EMPL-AD-404795_EN.html |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.973&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PETI-AD-405973_EN.html |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.556&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-404556_EN.html |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.819&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-404819_EN.html |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.806&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-405806_EN.html |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.770&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-404770_EN.html |
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.806&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-404806_EN.html |
docs/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.737&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ECON-AD-405737_EN.html |
docs/15/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE406.164&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AD-406164_EN.html |
docs/16/docs/0/url |
Old
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.918&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-405918_EN.html |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.663&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.663&secondRef=02 |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.701&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.701&secondRef=02 |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.787&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.787&secondRef=02 |
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.685&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.685&secondRef=02 |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.719&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.719&secondRef=02 |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.729&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.729&secondRef=02 |
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.795&secondRef=03New
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.795&secondRef=03 |
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.973&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.973&secondRef=02 |
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.556&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.556&secondRef=02 |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.819&secondRef=03New
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.819&secondRef=03 |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.806&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.806&secondRef=02 |
docs/11/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.770&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.770&secondRef=02 |
docs/12/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE404.806&secondRef=03New
http://nullEN&reference=PE404.806&secondRef=03 |
docs/13/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.737&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.737&secondRef=02 |
docs/14/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE407.780New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE407.780 |
docs/15/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE406.164&secondRef=02New
http://nullEN&reference=PE406.164&secondRef=02 |
docs/16/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE405.918&secondRef=03New
http://nullEN&reference=PE405.918&secondRef=03 |
docs/17/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE420.046New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE420.046 |
docs/18/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE420.128New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=PE420.128 |
docs/19/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0145_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0145_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20090506&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/EN&reference=20090506&type=CRE |
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/19 |
|
docs/19/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-145&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0145_EN.html |
docs/20/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A6-2009-145&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-6-2009-0145_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P6-TA-2009-373New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-6-2009-0373_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/6 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/7 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/8 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/9 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/10 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/11 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/12 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/13 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/14 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/15 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/16 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/17 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/18 |
|
committees/19 |
|
committees/19 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFCO/6/60379New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure EP 052-p4
|
procedure/legal_basis/1 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052-p2
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
other/0/dg/title |
Old
Secretariat GeneralNew
Secretariat-General |
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|