BETA

6 Amendments of Hubert PIRKER related to 2011/0294(COD)

Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 14 a (new)
(14a) In order for infrastructure projects to be carried out and for a success to be made of them, it is of immense importance to foster general acceptance on the part of local residents. The interests of regional and local authorities as well as of local civil society affected by a project of common interest should be appropriately taken into account in the planning and construction phases of a project.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 25 a (new)
(25a) The core network has been identified on the basis of an objective planning methodology. This methodology has identified the most important urban nodes, ports, airports and border crossing points. These nodes are connected with multimodal links, wherever possible, and are economically viable, environmentally sustainable and feasible until 2030. The methodology has ensured the connection of all Member States and the integration of the main islands into the core network. Detours are justified in order to circumvent unavoidable obstacles or ecologically sensitive areas or else to link smaller towns, airports, terminals, etc., so long as the disadvantages arising from these detours do not exceed the benefits in terms of improved regional or local accessibility. Traffic flows should be combined wherever possible, taking due account of topographical features, environmental impact, user requirements and potential capacity bottlenecks.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – title
Resource efficient network and special circumstances
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 a (new)
In planning and developing the trans- European Transport Network, Member States, regional and local authorities, infrastructure managers, transport undertakings and public and private agencies shall take account of the particular circumstances in the various parts of the Union, such as, in particular, tourism aspects and topographical features of the regions concerned, and shall, where necessary, propose alternative routes or special construction measures which respect the methodology laid down in this Regulation.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) mitigatpreventing noise and reducing theits impact of noise caused by rail transport; by means of infrastructure measures and by retrofitting existing rolling stock;
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 512 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) port facilities, freight terminals and logistics platforms located outside the port area but constructed for the port operations, information and communication technologies (ICT) such as electronic logistics management systems, safety and security and administrative and customs procedures in at least one Member State;
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN