3 Amendments of Henri WEBER related to 2012/2149(INI)
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Reiterates its call for the completion if possible of a transatlantic market by 2015, strictly based on the principle of a social market economy, the realisation of which – alongside the completion of the EU’s own single market – will be a core factor in re- launching global economic growth and recovery;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Supports the view that given the low average tariffs, the key to unlocking the potential of the transatlantic relationship lies in the tackling of non-tariff barriers (NTBs), consisting mainly of customs procedures and behind-the-border regulatory restrictions; notes accordingly that a tariff agreement alone will not be sufficient for either side; supports the ambition proposed by the HLWG to move progressively towards an even more integrated transatlantic marketplace, while recognising that ano agreement could not a priory resolve all existing regulatory issues immediately and must be negotiated while fully respecting the right of each side to regulate in a manner that ensures the protection of health, safety and environment at the level that each side deems appropriate;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Affirms the importance of IPR to stimulate job and economic growth, and the significance, therefore, that high standards be maintained for IPR protection and enforcement, while promoting the free flow of information; agrees with; notes the assessment of the HLWG that even though both the EU and US are committed to high level of IPR protection and enforcement, it might not be feasible, in eventual negotiations, to seek to reconcile across- the-board differences with regards to the IPR obligations typically included in EU and US trade agreements; underlines, however, that the approach proposed for negotiations should be ambitious, aiming at solving the areas of divergence, whilend dealing with all the IPR matters in a future agreement in a mutually satisfactory manner, while ensuring a satisfactory level of protection for economic operators;