BETA

14 Amendments of József SZÁJER related to 2015/2147(INI)

Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that stimulating growth, innovation, consumer choice and competitiveness is of the utmost importance and believes that the digital single market is key to achieving this objective by removing barriers to trade, streamlining processes for online businesses and supporting creators, investors and consumers; calls in this regard for competitiveness tests on all new proposalall new proposals to be subject to competitiveness tests and to detailed impact assessments examining their effects on growth, SMEs and employment as well as their potential costs and benefits;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Welcomes the communication of the Commission" Towards a Connected Digital Single Market Act" and the included commitment to modernise the copyright framework to adapt them to the digital age while at the same time ensuring the right balance between a fair remuneration of the author, the public interest of dissemination of knowledge and preserving cultural diversity;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Stresses the potential of the Digital Single Market to stimulate social and generational inclusion which requires a regulatory framework that makes private investment in creative infrastructure commercially attractive as this will ultimately be beneficial to creators and end-users;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph -2 a (new)
-2a. Calls on distributors to publish all available information concerning the technological measures necessary to ensure interoperability of their content;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Calls for targeted, evidence-based reforms to enhance cross-border access to legally available online content but stresses the importance of not mandating pan- European licences; calls instead for reforms to enable the enhanced portability of legally acquired content to be prioritised, and for the introduction of commercial models for flexible licensing, benefiting consumers without undermining either the principle of territoriality for exclusive rights or that of freedom of contract, both of which play a fundamental role in the financing of audiovisual works;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 70 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Emphasises that any reform of the copyright framework should take as a basis a high level of protection, since rights are crucial to intellectual creation and provide a stable, clear and flexible legal base that fosters investment and growth in the creative and cultural sector, whilst removing legal uncertainties and inconsistencies that adversely affect the functioning of the internal market;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 73 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that any initiative to modernise copyright is preceded by a wide-ranging study of its likely impact on the production, financing and distribution of audiovisual works, and also on cultural diversity;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 75 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Asks the Commission to ensure in this respect fair remuneration for creators and rightholders and to guarantee that persistence and perseverance is exercised throughout the creative supply chain;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 110 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Believes that internet service providers should bear greater responsibility for illegal content made available on the internet and shouldconsideration should be given as to how internet service providers and online intermediaries, along with other actors in the supply chain, such as payment providers, could play a significant role ingreater role in facilitating action against illegal content and tackling copyright abuses on a commercial scale;
2015/09/24
Committee: JURI
Amendment 127 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3b. Calls on the Commission to consider solutions aimed at remedying the displacement of the value of creative works from content to services; stresses the need to adjust the definition of the status of intermediary to match the current digital environment;
2015/09/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 130 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 c (new)
3c. Recalls that under Article 5 of Directive 2000/31/EC, providers of online services are obliged to clearly indicate their identity, and that compliance with this requirement is vital to ensuring consumer confidence in e-commerce;
2015/09/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 151 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Welcomes the intention of the Commission on boosting competitiveness through interoperability and standardisation and invites the Commission to support the implementation the judgment of the European Court of Justice has delivered a preliminary ruling in the case C-170/13 (Huawei v. ZTE] in July 2015, which strengthens the European standardization system by striking the right balance between the interests of the holders of standard-essential patents and standard implementers in order to avoid potential abuses on either side, most importantly to avoid patent infringements;
2015/09/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 168 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. WelcomesRegrets that the Commission’s aim to withdraew theits proposal onfor a Common European Sales Law and the intention to propose rules for digital content; notes the proposal to introduce the ‘home option’ in order to bring down barriers to cross- border trade; insists on the need for comprehensive evidence and consultation with stakeholders before this approach is pursued, in particular as regards the impact it would have on the current protection provided to consumers under national law, especially in terms of remedies for failure to comply with the terms of contracts for online sales.without consulting the European Parliament, recalls that Parliament adopted its first reading position with vast majority on 26.02.2014, Welcomes however the Commission’s intention to propose rules for digital content; reiterates Parliaments repeated request that any new proposal should be based on EP’s first reading position;
2015/09/28
Committee: JURI
Amendment 185 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Stresses that digital developments also provide for a meaningful change in public administration, establishing much more effective, simplified and user-friendly e- administration. In this regard it is very important for the citizens and the business to have interconnected commercial registers;
2015/09/28
Committee: JURI