BETA

12 Amendments of Andreas SCHWAB related to 2011/2084(INI)

Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas market fragmentation not only makes it difficult for regulated providers to supply legal offerings on a cross-border basis, but also makes it virtually impossible to protect consumers and combat the crime associated with gambling at the European level,
2011/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
G. whereas Internet gambling and betting, if not properly regulated, involve a greater risk of addiction and dangers than traditional physical, location- based gambling,
2011/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital H
H. whereas gambling represents a considerable source of revenue for the Member States, for publicly beneficial and charitable purposes and for the fundingwhich is used mainly for the funding of publicly beneficial and charitable activities, such as tourism promotion, and of sport,
2011/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph -1 (new)
-1. Welcomes the fact that the Commission has taken the initiative of launching public consultation in connection with its Green Paper on online betting and gambling, which will facilitate pragmatic and realistic consideration of the future of this sector in Europe;
2011/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point 2
(2) containmbat the illegal gambling market,
2011/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point 3
(3) guarantee effective protection for young people and vulnerable gamblers,
2011/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point 6
(6) that risks tospecific measures are promoted to guarantee the integrity of sporting competition are precluded and
2011/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Is of the opinion that the gambling sector has been very much shapEmphasises that any regulation of the gambling sector is subject to, and must be underpinned by, the Member States' different traditions and cultures and that gambling markets are very differently regulated, giving the subsidiarity principle a particularly important role in this sectorsubsidiarity principle; considers, however, that this principle must be understood to imply ‘active subsidiarity’ entailing cooperation among the national administrations to achieve closer harmonisation of practice;
2011/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Notes that betting on, in particular, minor-sports competitions sport may represent a risk to the integrity of sport; is therefore of the view that sport fraud and betting fraud should be penalised throughout Europeupholds its view, therefore, that betting on sport is a form of commercial exploitation of sports competitions and recommends that the rights of sports event organisers should be defined in European and national law and that cooperation between sports bodies and the competent national prosecuting authorities should be expanded;
2011/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16 d (new)
16d. Stresses the importance of education in sport and calls on the Member States and sports federations to lay down well- defined rules on sports betting and to adequately inform and educate professional and amateur gamblers;
2011/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 17
17. Is aware of the particular importance of the contribution from gambling revenue towards the funding of sport in the Member States; states that further development of the Internet gambling market should therefore not lead to a reduction in sports fundingall levels of professional and amateur sport in the Member States; recommends therefore ensuring appropriate financial transfers for the benefit of sports by the organisers of betting on sports;
2011/09/08
Committee: IMCO
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18
18. Points to the need for pragmatic solutions with regard to advertisingrecent judgments of the Court indicating that, in order to attain the objective of keeping gambling under control, it is necessary for, and sponsoring of, sports events by Internet gambling provideruthorised organisers of gambling games to provide a reliable alternative to unregulated gambling services, which may also entail, inter alia, a certain volume of advertising and the use of new marketing techniques; is of the opinion that common advertising standards should be adopted which sufficiently protect vulnerable consumers, but at the same time make sponsorship of international events possible, and that advertising bans are in any case ineffective;
2011/09/08
Committee: IMCO