BETA

3 Amendments of Angelika BEER related to 2007/2118(INI)

Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Therefore asks the Commission and the Member States to put forward the the Member States to put forward the following demands and to call for: following demands and to call for: - a thorough assessment of the - a thorough assessment of the various transparency, economic various transparency, economic and budget-related aspects of and budget-related aspects of Nord Stream and its affiliated Nord Stream and its affiliated companies; companies; - a thorough legal assessment aimed - a thorough legal assessment aimed at determining whether a broader at determining whether a broader set of legal framework is set of legal framework is applicable; applicable; - a thorough assessment of the need - a thorough assessment of the need for the project and consideration for the project and consideration of all alternatives, including the of all alternatives, including the Amber and Yamal II pipelines; Amber and Yamal II pipelines; - a truly independent environmental - a truly independent environmental impact assessment, to be impact assessment, to be commissioned with the approval commissioned with the approval of all littoral states; of all littoral states, focusing in particular on the problem of - ratification of, and commitment to hazardous abandoned the full implementation of the ammunition along the entire provisions of, the Espoo pipeline route; Convention and the Energy Charter Treaty, including its - ratification of, and commitment to Transit Protocol, as an act of good the full implementation of the faith and to encourage the Russian provisions of, the Espoo Federation’s confidence in the Convention and the Energy project; Charter Treaty, including its - opportunities for equal Transit Protocol, as an act of good participation by all the littoral faith and to encourage the Russian states; Federation’s confidence in the project; - opportunities for equal participation by all the littoral states;
2008/04/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Notes the lack of institutional structures capable of responding adequately to the environmental and geopolitical security issues associated with this project, and once again calls on the Council to consider the proposal for the creation of the office of High Official for Foreign Energy Policy, who, wearing a ‘double hat’, would act under the authority of the newly created strengthened High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, a Vice-President of the Commission.deleted
2008/04/18
Committee: AFET
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Categorically rejects the idea of securing energy routes by military means.
2008/04/18
Committee: AFET