9 Amendments of Helga TRÜPEL related to 2012/2307(BUD)
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. RecallConsiders that the "draft package" agreed, after difficult negotiations, by Parliament and Council during the Trilogue of 29 November 2012 consists of three elements: the Amending Budget No 6/2012 for EUR 6 billion, partially covering the shortage of payments in 2012, the Union Budget for the year 2013 set to a level of EUR 150 898,391 million and EUR 132 836,988 million, respectively iCouncil’s position on the 2013 draft budget is contrary to the principles of good budgetary management as laid out in Art. 323 TFEU; deems that the Council’s position is in stark contradiction to the principles of the European Growth Pact established by the European Council in July 2012 as it cuts down or reports the payments in exactly the policy fields identified by the European Council as conducive to growth; recalls that the growth intended should be sustainable from an ecommitment and payment appropriations and three joint statements ensuring that the actual payment needs in 2012 and 2013 will be duly coveredlogical and social point of view and should positively contribute to the transformation towards a green economy;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the overall level of commitments appropriations agreed, which represents an increase of EUR 1,1 billion compared to the original reading of the Council; is pleased that the biggest part of its political priorities is secured in next year's budget, with particular emphasis on the proper implementHas therefore amended the Council’s position in order to increase appropriation ofs in the EU commitment for growth and jobs, as identified in the Europe 2020 strategyfield of competitiveness, research and development;
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 a (new)
Paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. Regrets the cuts operated to development aid in the 2013 budget and re-establishes were needed the 2012 levels;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 b (new)
Paragraph 2 b (new)
2b. Believes that abandoning the ITER project would free up much needed resources in general, which could be used for investing into already working renewable energy technologies; has therefore reduced ITER appropriations accordingly;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Notes that, due to the intransigent position of the Council in the negotiations, the overall level of payments set is EUR 5 billion lower than the Commission's draft budget for 2013; is concerned that this level of appropriations will be insufficient to cover the actual payments needs of next year; is convinced, however, that the cost of a non agreement would imply much more serious consequences and a much more negative impact on the implementation of the Union actions and programmes;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8