6 Amendments of Ana GOMES related to 2018/2088(INI)
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Calls on the Commission to collaborate closely with technical researchers to investigate, prevent, and mitigate potential harmful effects of malicious uses and to develop tools, policies, and norms appropriate to ensure the ethical governance of AI applications; notes that best practices should be identified in research areas with more mature methods for addressing dual- use concerns, such as security and privacy, and that they should be applied to the area of AI;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Highlights the fact that malicious and unethical use of AI could threaten human rights and the rule of law, digital security, physical security, and political security as it could be used to conduct large-scale, finely-targeted and highly- efficient attacks;
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses that European standards for AI must be based on the principles of digital ethics, human dignity, respect for fundamental rights, data protection and security, thus contributing to building trust among users; emphasises the importance of capitalising on the EU’s potential for creating a strong infrastructure for AI systems rooted in high standards of data and, respect for humanethics and the rule of law, and ultimately controlled by human beings;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Welcomes the Commission’s initiative to establish the European AI Alliance tasked with developing draft AI ethical guidelines; calls on the Commission to complete the work and publish the guidelines, and to continue working towards an EU-wide approach which will be human centric and human governed;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Underlines that any AI system must be developed with respect for the principles of transparency, allowing for human understanding of its actions; notes that in order to build trust in and enable the progress of AI, users must be aware of how their data is used and when they are communicating or interacting with an AI system; believes that this will contribute to better understanding and confidence among users when dealing with machines; stresses that the explainability of decisions must be an EU standard in accordance with Articles 13, 14 and 15 of the GDPR; stresses that individuals have the right to a final determination being made by a person guided by ethic principles;
Amendment 66 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Stresses the importance of the quality of data used in the development of algorithms, as the standard of AI systems relies on the data used to train them; notes that the use of low quality, outdated, incomplete or incorrect data may lead to poor predictions and in turn discrimination and bias, and that it is therefore important in the age of big data to ensure that algorithms are trained on representative samples of high quality data in order to achieve statistical parity and to ensure there are ways to prevent and redress any unfair discrimination.