3 Amendments of Sajjad KARIM related to 2012/2322(INI)
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recognises, however, the consistent jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union, which emphasises that national controls should be enacted and applied in a consistent, proportionate and non-discriminatory manner and be in line with the legal objectives pursued in order to protect consumers and the public order and prevent fraud;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Calls on the Commission to encourage the establishment of a code of practice by sports event organisers, betting operators and public authorities with a view to developing the mechanisms necessary to preserve the integrity of sports, including provisions for the financing of those mechanisms;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Considers that the approximation ofa consistent approach towards criminal sanctions is essential to a pan- European approach to regulating the online gambling sector and, to this end, calls on the Commission to examine the appropriateness of bringing forward legislative proposals to establish minimum rules regarding the definition ofurges the Member States to ensure that the fraudulent manipulation of results for financial or other advantage is prohibited by establishing as a criminal offences and sanctions in respect of unregulated online gambling and the fight against match-fixing, and crime associated with it, at EU levely threat to the integrity of competitions, including those linked to betting operations;