BETA


Events

2014/10/21
   DE_BUNDESRAT - Contribution
Documents
2013/12/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2013/09/10
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/09/10
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 572 votes to 79, with 61 abstentions, a resolution on online gambling in the internal market.

Parliament stresses that gambling is not an ordinary economic activity. Given the special nature of the online gambling sector, the protection of human health and consumers should be the main guiding principle when EU-level recommendations and national legislation are made. In this context, Parliament considers that, in order to ensure a high level of consumer protection, in particular for those consumers who are the most vulnerable , it is appropriate to ensure a fair and legal offer of gambling services defined by each Member State in compliance with Union law might. It warns that gambling can lead to dangerous addiction, which is an issue that would need to be addressed in any legislative proposal for the sake of consumers .

The resolution calls for a series of actions from Member States and the Commission, as appropriate, to:

· take action against illegal gambling offered from within Member State territories;

· ensure a high level of consumer and health protection in the Union;

· continue to explore measures at EU level to protect vulnerable consumers ;

· oblige operators working with a licence from the Member State to carry the logo, trustmark of the regulatory authority in a prominent fixed position on its website;

· stop the practice whereby companies based in one Member State market online-gambling services – for example via satellite-TV or advertisement campaigns – in another Member State in which they are not licensed to offer such services;

· ensure operators are obliged to display clear, prominent and explicit warnings to minors stating that it is illegal for them to engage in online gambling;

· carry out, in a coordinated manner, further studies to understand problem gambling;

· explore the possibility of EU-wide interoperability between national self-exclusion registers so that any customer self-excluding or surpassing their gambling limits at one gambling operator has the opportunity to be automatically self-excluded from all other licensed gambling operators;

· consider implementing a compulsory third-party identification control in order to exclude minors or persons using fake identities from playing;

· ensure gambling operators are obliged actively to promote the use of self-restrictions at the time of registration as well as in cases of repeated losses.

Common standards : Parliament takes the view that common standards for online gambling should address the rights and obligations of both the service provider and the consumer , ensuring a high level of protection for citizens and consumers, in particular minors and other vulnerable persons, and the prevention of misleading and excessive advertisements. It encourages the European gambling operators’ associations to develop and adopt self-regulatory codes of conduct.

Parliament recommends the introduction of uniform, pan-European common security standards for electronic identification and cross border e-verification services . It calls for registration and identification procedures to be streamlined and made more efficient, notably in order to ensure efficient identification mechanisms and to prevent multiple accounts per player and access by minors to online gambling websites . It also recommends the exchange of best practices between Member States on enforcement measures – such as on establishing white and black lists of illegal gambling websites, jointly defining secure and traceable payment solutions, and considering the feasibility of blocking financial transactions – in order to protect consumers against illegal operators.

Parliament goes on to call on Member States and on operators to encourage responsible advertising in relation to online gambling. It asks the Commission to include common minimum standards that provide sufficient protection for vulnerable consumers containing clear warnings to minors.

For minors, the resolution particularly recommends: (i) introduction of school courses aimed at young people on the best uses of the Internet; (ii) effective measures to raise awareness of the risks of gambling addiction; (iii) defining a non-harmful format for advertising, and preventing people under 18 from gambling and combating problematic and compulsive gambling.

In terms of legal action, Member States are asked to only authorise operators who fulfil at least the following requirements and are thus considered to be legal:

· the operator must have a licence which gives it a right to operate in the Member State of the player;

· the operator is not considered to be illegal under the law applicable in any other Member State.

Compliance with EU law : Parliament recognises that with due regard to the principle of subsidiarity, Member States have the right to determine how the offer of online gambling services is organised and regulated in accordance with their own values and pursued objectives of general interest, while observing Union law. The Commission is asked to continue to monitor and enforce compliance of national laws and practices with EU law, in cooperation with the Member States, and to launch infringement procedures against those Member States that appear to breach EU law. All legislation must be proportionate, consistent, transparent, and non-discriminatory.

Parliament wants the Commission and Member states to be more ambitious and draw up coordinated measures and strategies , with a view to addressing the social costs and harmful effects of gambling activities. Those Member States that choose to open up their online gambling sector must provide for a transparent and legally certain licensing application procedure based on objective and non-discriminatory criteria, in full compliance with EU law and with sufficient and strict citizen and consumer protection.

Administrative cooperation : recalling the Commission initiative to set up an expert group on gambling in order to share best practice and and information on establishing a common system on identification of players as well as technical measures, Parliament asks the Commission to include experts specialised in problem and pathological gambling in expert groups and consultations. Stressing the need for cooperation and exchanges of best practices among national experts from the social and health spheres, Members encourage the Member States to work in close cooperation with the Commission and with each other to coordinate steps to combat the unauthorised supply of cross-border gambling services .

At the same time, it stresses the importance for the expert group to work towards more transparent and simplified procedures that remove unnecessary administrative burdens on Member States that could unnecessarily increase costs for legal online operators in those countries which choose to open up their markets. It believes that steps should be taken to bring national tax regimes for gambling services into line with one other in order to prevent disproportionate tax concessions from fostering a proliferation and concentration of online gambling services.

Money laundering : Parliament recalls that online gambling is a non-cash-based environment and that – given the dependency on third-party financial service providers – additional safeguards against money laundering are needed . It calls on the Commission, the Member States and the expert group to take effective action against money laundering. The resolution welcomes, in this respect, the proposal to extend the provisions of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive to include all forms of gambling. It emphasises that solid registration and unambiguous verification systems are key tools in preventing any misuse of online gambling, and advantage can be taken of online bank and credit-card verification systems.

Integrity of sports : Parliament deals with the problem of match-fixing , taking account of its transnational nature. It notes that match fixing occurs in both the offline and the online gambling markets and that, in the majority of cases, online betting-related match-fixing occurs through gambling operators established in unregulated markets outside the EU .

Against this background, Parliament calls for the following principal measures:

the strict regulation or the prohibition , after an evaluation conducted at the level of each Member State, of dangerous forms of gambling a code of conduct, containing a general ban on all staff involved in sporting events from placing bets on their own matches or events; the adoption at national level of effective measures to prevent conflicts of interest, notably by avoiding wagers of all stakeholders from the world of sports on betting organised on competitions in which they are involved; ban all forms of live sports betting since these have proved to be very vulnerable to match-fixing and therefore pose a risk to the integrity of sport; an obligation for cooperation on suspicious activities with Europol and Eurojust; the creation of a global platform for exchange of information and best practices and in the coordination of joint prevention and enforcement actions; ensure that the fraudulent manipulation of results for financial or other advantage is prohibited by establishing as a criminal offence any threat to the integrity of competitions; take action at EU level against unregulated online gambling and to support the fight against match-fixing.

Parliament recommends that sporting competitions should be protected from any unauthorised commercial use, notably by recognising the property rights of sports event organisers .

It calls on sport federations and gambling operators to include, in a code of conduct , a ban on betting on so-called negative events, such as yellow cards, penalty kicks or free kicks during a match or event and to ban all forms of live sports betting since these have proved to be very vulnerable to match-fixing and therefore pose a risk to the integrity of sport. In this regard, Parliament calls on the Commission to install a European alert system for betting regulators in order rapidly to exchange information about fixed sporting events.

Lastly, Parliament welcomes transnational education projects to combat match-fixing on a global level.

Documents
2013/09/10
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/06/11
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report by Ashley FOX (ECR, UK) on online gambling in the internal market.

Members stress that gambling is not an ordinary economic activity. Given the special nature of the online gambling sector, the protection of human health and consumers should be the main guiding principle when EU-level recommendations and national legislation are made. In this context, Members consider that, in order to ensure a high level of consumer protection, in particular for those consumers who are the most vulnerable , it is appropriate to ensure a fair and legal offer of gambling services defined by each Member State in compliance with Union law might. They warn that gambling can lead to dangerous addiction, which is an issue that would need to be addressed in any legislative proposal for the sake of consumers and the integrity of this form of sport.

The report calls for a series of actions from Member States and the Commission, as appropriate, to:

· take action against illegal gambling offered from within Member State territories;

· ensure a high level of consumer and health protection in the Union;

· continue to explore measures at EU level to protect vulnerable consumers ;

· oblige operators working with a licence from the Member State to carry the logo, trustmark of the regulatory authority in a prominent fixed position on its website;

· stop the practice whereby companies based in one Member State market online-gambling services – for example via satellite-TV or advertisement campaigns – in another Member State in which they are not licensed to offer such services;

· ensure operators are obliged to display clear, prominent and explicit warnings to minors stating that it is illegal for them to engage in online gambling;

· carry out, in a coordinated manner, further studies to understand problem gambling;

· explore the possibility of EU-wide interoperability between national self-exclusion registers so that any customer self-excluding or surpassing their gambling limits at one gambling operator has the opportunity to be automatically self-excluded from all other licensed gambling operators;

· consider implementing a compulsory third-party identification control in order to exclude minors or persons using fake identities from playing;

· ensure gambling operators are obliged actively to promote the use of self-restrictions at the time of registration as well as in cases of repeated losses.

Common standards : Members take the view that common standards for online gambling should address the rights and obligations of both the service provider and the consumer , ensuring a high level of protection for citizens and consumers, in particular minors and other vulnerable persons, and the prevention of misleading and excessive advertisements. They encourage the European gambling operators’ associations to develop and adopt self-regulatory codes of conduct.

Members recommend the introduction of uniform, pan-European common security standards for electronic identification and cross border e-verification services . They also recommend the exchange of best practices on enforcement measures – such as on establishing white and black lists of, and preventing access to, illegal gambling websites, jointly defining secure and traceable payment solutions, and considering the feasibility of blocking financial transactions.

The report goes on to call on Member States and on operators to encourage responsible advertising in relation to online gambling. It asks the Commission to include common minimum standards that provide sufficient protection for vulnerable consumers containing clear warnings to minors.

For minors, the report particularly recommends: (i) introduction of school courses aimed at young people on the best uses of the Internet; (ii) effective measures to raise awareness of the risks of gambling addiction; (iii) defining a non-harmful format for advertising, and preventing people under 18 from gambling and combating problematic and compulsive gambling.

In terms of legal action, Member States are asked to only authorise operators who fulfil at least the following requirements and are thus considered to be legal:

· the operator must have a licence which gives it a right to operate in the Member State of the player;

· the operator is not considered to be illegal under the law applicable in any other Member State.

Compliance with EU law: Members recognise that with due regard to the principle of subsidiarity, Member States have the right to determine how the offer of online gambling services is organised and regulated in accordance with their own values and pursued objectives of general interest, while observing Union law. The Commission is asked to continue to monitor and enforce compliance of national laws and practices with EU law, in cooperation with the Member States, and to launch infringement procedures against those Member States that appear to breach EU law.

Members want the Commission and Member states to be more ambitious and draw up coordinated measures and strategies , with a view to addressing the social costs and harmful effects of gambling activities. Those Member States that choose to open up their online gambling sector must provide for a transparent and legally certain licensing application procedure based on objective and non-discriminatory criteria, in full compliance with EU law and with sufficient and strict citizen and consumer protection.

Administrative cooperation : recalling the Commission initiative to set up an expert group on gambling in order to share best practice and and information on establishing a common system on identification of players as well as technical measures, Members ask the Commission to include experts specialised in problem and pathological gambling in expert groups and consultations. Stressing the need for cooperation and exchanges of best practices among national experts from the social and health spheres, Members encourage the Member States to work in close cooperation with the Commission and with each other to coordinate steps to combat the unauthorised supply of cross-border gambling services .

At the same time, they stress the importance for the expert group to work towards more transparent and simplified procedures that remove unnecessary administrative burdens on Member States that could unnecessarily increase costs for legal online operators in those countries which choose to open up their markets. They believe that steps should be taken to bring national tax regimes for gambling services into line with one other in order to prevent disproportionate tax concessions from fostering a proliferation and concentration of online gambling services.

Money laundering: Members point out that online gambling is a non-cash-based environment and that – given the dependency on third-party financial service providers – additional safeguards against money laundering are needed . They call on the Commission, the Member States and the expert group to take effective action against money laundering.

The report welcomes, in this respect, the proposal to extend the provisions of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive to include all forms of gambling. It emphasises that solid registration and unambiguous verification systems are key tools in preventing any misuse of online gambling, and advantage can be taken of online bank and credit-card verification systems.

Integrity of sports : Members deal with the problem of match-fixing , taking account of its transnational nature. They note that match fixing occurs in both the offline and the online gambling markets and that, in the majority of cases, online betting-related match-fixing occurs through gambling operators established in unregulated markets outside the EU .

They call for the following principal measures:

· a code of conduct, containing a general ban on all staff involved in sporting events from placing bets on their own matches or events;

· the adoption at national level of effective measures to prevent conflicts of interest, notably by avoiding wagers of all stakeholders from the world of sports on betting organised on competitions in which they are involved;

· ban all forms of live sports betting since these have proved to be very vulnerable to match-fixing and therefore pose a risk to the integrity of sport;

· an obligation for cooperation on suspicious activities with Europol and Eurojust;

· the creation of a global platform for exchange of information and best practices and in the coordination of joint prevention and enforcement actions;

· ensure that the fraudulent manipulation of results for financial or other advantage is prohibited by establishing as a criminal offence any threat to the integrity of competitions;

· take action at EU level against unregulated online gambling and to support the fight against match-fixing.

Members recommend that sporting competitions should be protected from any unauthorised commercial use, notably by recognising the property rights of sports event organisers .

Lastly, Member States are asked to consider a ban on all forms of spot fixing , such as gambling on corner kicks, free kicks, throw-ins and yellow cards, as these has proven to be very vulnerable to match-fixing. The report calls up the Commission to install a European alert system for betting regulators in order rapidly to exchange information about fixed sporting events.

Documents
2013/05/30
   EP - Vote in committee
2013/04/29
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2013/04/29
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2013/04/18
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/02/27
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2013/01/15
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2013/01/14
   EP - BORYS Piotr (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2012/12/18
   DE_BUNDESRAT - Contribution
Documents
2012/12/12
   EP - BELET Ivo (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2012/10/23
   EC - Non-legislative basic document
Details

PURPOSE: Commission Communication on a strategy to meet the regulatory and technical challenges of the online gambling sector.

CONTENT: online gambling is a fast growing service activity in the EU, with annual growth rates of almost 15% and estimated annual revenues in 2015 in the region of EUR 13 billion, compared to EUR 9.3 billion in 2011. This would represent a total growth rate of almost 40%. It is estimated that about 6.84 million European consumers participate in online gambling.

The nature of the online environment means that gambling sites may operate in the EU, outside any form of control carried out by regulators within the EU. Consumers in Europe also search across borders for online gambling services which, if not properly regulated, may expose them to significant risks. The extensive range of offers and the rising level of demand for online gambling services pose a number of challenges when it comes to ensuring the proper implementation of public policy objectives at the national, EU and international level.

Following the Commission Green Paper in 2011 and the European Parliament resolution on online gambling in the internal market, this Communication identifies the key challenges posed by the co-existence of national regulatory frameworks within the internal market. It also seeks to propose answers to these challenges in the form of actions to be taken both at the national and EU level.

The paper points out that while Member States are in principle free to set the objectives of their policy on games of chance and to define in detail the level of protection sought, national regulatory frameworks have to comply with EU law and internal market rules. Ensuring compliance of national law with the Treaty is therefore essential to a successful EU policy on online gambling. In view of the type of challenges posed by the development of online gambling and their implications for each Member State, it is not possible for Member States effectively to address these challenges alone and to provide individually a properly regulated and sufficiently safe offer of online gambling services.

The Communication proposes a combination of initiatives and measures covering a range of issues, seeking to enhance legal clarity and establish policies based on available evidence. These actions, fully taking into account the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, highlight five priority areas to address the challenges in the EU.

(1) Compliance of national regulatory frameworks with EU law: online gambling regulation in Member States is characterised by a diversity of regulatory frameworks. Recent regulatory changes in Member States have led to an increase in the offer of gambling services by operators authorised in an EU Member State over the last few years and to considerable differences in national regulations. Furthermore, cross-border offers are often not authorised under national rules in the recipient Member State.

Compliance of these national rules with the Treaty has been challenged in front of national 6 courts and questions on the interpretation of EU law have been referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The ECJ has confirmed that national rules that prohibit the provision of gambling services authorised in other Member States were found to restrict the freedom of national residents to receive, over the internet, services offered in other Member States. They also restrict the freedom of operators established in other Member States to provide gambling services.

The national rules in question focus mainly on consumer protection objectives, in particular the prevention of problem gambling and the protection of minors, and on crime and fraud prevention. While Member States usually offer legitimate reasons for the restriction of cross border gambling services, they must nonetheless demonstrate the necessity of the measure in question, in particular the existence of a problem linked to the public interest objective at stake and the consistency of the regulatory system.

The Commission has launched infringement cases against a significant number of Member States, and will accelerate its assessment of national provisions in the pending infringements cases and complaints and take enforcement action wherever necessary.

(2) Enhancing administrative cooperation and efficient enforcement : enhancing administrative cooperation will assist Member States and gambling regulators in their regulatory and supervisory role and improve the quality of their work. Practical cooperation will enable Member States to become familiar with the systems of others, and to develop closer working relations at the operational level.

The Commission will:

facilitate administrative cooperation between gambling regulators; enhance exchange of information and best practice on enforcement measures and explore the benefits and possible limits of responsive enforcement measures, such as payment blocking and disabling access to websites, at EU level; provide clarification on the procedures for notifying and acting on unauthorised content hosted in the EU by online intermediaries; develop regulatory dialogue with third countries.

Member States are urged to:

provide gambling regulatory authorities with clear competences and ensure cooperation with other relevant competent authorities; explore means to inform consumers about available authorised offers in order to direct demand to the legal market.

(3) Protecting consumers and citizens, minors and vulnerable groups : appropriate action in the EU is needed so as to: (i) draw consumers away from unregulated and potentially harmful offers; (ii) protect minors from accessing gambling facilities, recalling that the protection of minors must be a priority not least because 75% of 6-17 year olds in Europe use the internet; (iii) safeguard other vulnerable groups and (iv) prevent the development of gambling-related disorders, since it can be estimated that between 0.5-3% of the population in the EU suffer from some type of gambling disorder.

The paper notes also that responsible advertising is imperative in order to ensure that citizens are aware that:

age restrictions apply; gambling can be harmful if not played responsibly and the risks can be financial, social or health related.

As a first step the Commission will prepare a Recommendation on common protection of consumers, which should include a set of principles including effective and efficient registration of players, age verification and identification controls – in particular in the context of money transactions, reality checks (account activity, warning signs, signposting to helplines), no credit policy, protection of player funds, self-restriction possibilities (time/financial limits, exclusion) as well as customer support and efficient handling of complaints.

The Commission will also prepare a Recommendation on responsible gambling advertising in 2013 to ensure that operators authorised in a given Member State advertise gambling in a socially responsible manner and provide key information to consumers.

The Commission will, inter alia:

support benchmarking and testing of parental control tools through the Safer Internet Programme and the Connecting Europe Facility to improve age rating and content classification systems; assess recommendations on gambling-related internet addiction among adolescents under EU NET ADB in 2012.

Member States are urged to:

strengthen information and awareness raising initiatives on the risks related to gambling, as well as on unregulated gambling offers; improve cooperation between gambling regulatory authorities and consumer organisations; increase the availability and use of online safety practices of children and young people to prevent them from accessing gambling sites; carry out surveys and data collection on gambling disorders.

(4) Preventing fraud and money laundering : the main public interest objectives of Member States with regard to public order are the prevention of gambling fraud and money laundering. Credit card fraud and theft of banking credentials are reported to be the most common crime in relation to on-line gambling. Online gambling may also be used for laundering of funds stemming from illegal activities. These criminal offences are often committed cross-border and involve organised crime.

The Commission will:

consider extending the scope of the AML Directive to all forms of gambling in 2012; in the context of its policy on cybercrime, encourage exchanges of experience; explore the possibility of an EU standard on gambling equipment including gambling software in 2013.

(5) Safeguarding the integrity of sports and preventing match-fixing : betting related match fixing is a specific type of fraud that goes against the interests of sport organisations, sportspeople, players (consumers) and regulated gambling operators. The Commission will develop a Recommendation anti-match fixing measures with a view to:

promoting a more efficient exchange of good practices in the prevention of betting related match-fixing, including initiatives on awareness raising and training for actors in the field of sports; ensuring mutual reporting and follow-up actions of suspicious activities by sport bodies, operators and regulators, including gathering reliable figures on the scale of the problem; establishing minimum conflict of interest provisions, e.g betting bans for sport people and sport officials as well as the exclusion of youth events from betting; and introducing hotlines and other reporting or whistle-blowing alert mechanisms.

The Commission will also:

participate in the work of the Council of Europe on a possible Convention against manipulation of sports results; promote international cooperation and dialogue in the prevention of match fixing.

Member States are urged to:

set up national contact points bringing together all relevant actors involved in fighting match fixing; equip national legal and administrative systems with the tools, expertise and resources to combat match fixing; consider sustainable financing of sports integrity measures.

Lastly, the Commission will publish a report within two years, assessing these actions, notably with regard to the objectives of a more effective protection of consumers and deterrence of match-fixing. It will also assess whether these actions provide an adequate EU framework for online gambling or if additional measures, where necessary legislative ones, need to be taken at EU level.

2012/10/23
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: Commission Communication on a strategy to meet the regulatory and technical challenges of the online gambling sector.

CONTENT: online gambling is a fast growing service activity in the EU, with annual growth rates of almost 15% and estimated annual revenues in 2015 in the region of EUR 13 billion, compared to EUR 9.3 billion in 2011. This would represent a total growth rate of almost 40%. It is estimated that about 6.84 million European consumers participate in online gambling.

The nature of the online environment means that gambling sites may operate in the EU, outside any form of control carried out by regulators within the EU. Consumers in Europe also search across borders for online gambling services which, if not properly regulated, may expose them to significant risks. The extensive range of offers and the rising level of demand for online gambling services pose a number of challenges when it comes to ensuring the proper implementation of public policy objectives at the national, EU and international level.

Following the Commission Green Paper in 2011 and the European Parliament resolution on online gambling in the internal market, this Communication identifies the key challenges posed by the co-existence of national regulatory frameworks within the internal market. It also seeks to propose answers to these challenges in the form of actions to be taken both at the national and EU level.

The paper points out that while Member States are in principle free to set the objectives of their policy on games of chance and to define in detail the level of protection sought, national regulatory frameworks have to comply with EU law and internal market rules. Ensuring compliance of national law with the Treaty is therefore essential to a successful EU policy on online gambling. In view of the type of challenges posed by the development of online gambling and their implications for each Member State, it is not possible for Member States effectively to address these challenges alone and to provide individually a properly regulated and sufficiently safe offer of online gambling services.

The Communication proposes a combination of initiatives and measures covering a range of issues, seeking to enhance legal clarity and establish policies based on available evidence. These actions, fully taking into account the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, highlight five priority areas to address the challenges in the EU.

(1) Compliance of national regulatory frameworks with EU law: online gambling regulation in Member States is characterised by a diversity of regulatory frameworks. Recent regulatory changes in Member States have led to an increase in the offer of gambling services by operators authorised in an EU Member State over the last few years and to considerable differences in national regulations. Furthermore, cross-border offers are often not authorised under national rules in the recipient Member State.

Compliance of these national rules with the Treaty has been challenged in front of national 6 courts and questions on the interpretation of EU law have been referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The ECJ has confirmed that national rules that prohibit the provision of gambling services authorised in other Member States were found to restrict the freedom of national residents to receive, over the internet, services offered in other Member States. They also restrict the freedom of operators established in other Member States to provide gambling services.

The national rules in question focus mainly on consumer protection objectives, in particular the prevention of problem gambling and the protection of minors, and on crime and fraud prevention. While Member States usually offer legitimate reasons for the restriction of cross border gambling services, they must nonetheless demonstrate the necessity of the measure in question, in particular the existence of a problem linked to the public interest objective at stake and the consistency of the regulatory system.

The Commission has launched infringement cases against a significant number of Member States, and will accelerate its assessment of national provisions in the pending infringements cases and complaints and take enforcement action wherever necessary.

(2) Enhancing administrative cooperation and efficient enforcement : enhancing administrative cooperation will assist Member States and gambling regulators in their regulatory and supervisory role and improve the quality of their work. Practical cooperation will enable Member States to become familiar with the systems of others, and to develop closer working relations at the operational level.

The Commission will:

facilitate administrative cooperation between gambling regulators; enhance exchange of information and best practice on enforcement measures and explore the benefits and possible limits of responsive enforcement measures, such as payment blocking and disabling access to websites, at EU level; provide clarification on the procedures for notifying and acting on unauthorised content hosted in the EU by online intermediaries; develop regulatory dialogue with third countries.

Member States are urged to:

provide gambling regulatory authorities with clear competences and ensure cooperation with other relevant competent authorities; explore means to inform consumers about available authorised offers in order to direct demand to the legal market.

(3) Protecting consumers and citizens, minors and vulnerable groups : appropriate action in the EU is needed so as to: (i) draw consumers away from unregulated and potentially harmful offers; (ii) protect minors from accessing gambling facilities, recalling that the protection of minors must be a priority not least because 75% of 6-17 year olds in Europe use the internet; (iii) safeguard other vulnerable groups and (iv) prevent the development of gambling-related disorders, since it can be estimated that between 0.5-3% of the population in the EU suffer from some type of gambling disorder.

The paper notes also that responsible advertising is imperative in order to ensure that citizens are aware that:

age restrictions apply; gambling can be harmful if not played responsibly and the risks can be financial, social or health related.

As a first step the Commission will prepare a Recommendation on common protection of consumers, which should include a set of principles including effective and efficient registration of players, age verification and identification controls – in particular in the context of money transactions, reality checks (account activity, warning signs, signposting to helplines), no credit policy, protection of player funds, self-restriction possibilities (time/financial limits, exclusion) as well as customer support and efficient handling of complaints.

The Commission will also prepare a Recommendation on responsible gambling advertising in 2013 to ensure that operators authorised in a given Member State advertise gambling in a socially responsible manner and provide key information to consumers.

The Commission will, inter alia:

support benchmarking and testing of parental control tools through the Safer Internet Programme and the Connecting Europe Facility to improve age rating and content classification systems; assess recommendations on gambling-related internet addiction among adolescents under EU NET ADB in 2012.

Member States are urged to:

strengthen information and awareness raising initiatives on the risks related to gambling, as well as on unregulated gambling offers; improve cooperation between gambling regulatory authorities and consumer organisations; increase the availability and use of online safety practices of children and young people to prevent them from accessing gambling sites; carry out surveys and data collection on gambling disorders.

(4) Preventing fraud and money laundering : the main public interest objectives of Member States with regard to public order are the prevention of gambling fraud and money laundering. Credit card fraud and theft of banking credentials are reported to be the most common crime in relation to on-line gambling. Online gambling may also be used for laundering of funds stemming from illegal activities. These criminal offences are often committed cross-border and involve organised crime.

The Commission will:

consider extending the scope of the AML Directive to all forms of gambling in 2012; in the context of its policy on cybercrime, encourage exchanges of experience; explore the possibility of an EU standard on gambling equipment including gambling software in 2013.

(5) Safeguarding the integrity of sports and preventing match-fixing : betting related match fixing is a specific type of fraud that goes against the interests of sport organisations, sportspeople, players (consumers) and regulated gambling operators. The Commission will develop a Recommendation anti-match fixing measures with a view to:

promoting a more efficient exchange of good practices in the prevention of betting related match-fixing, including initiatives on awareness raising and training for actors in the field of sports; ensuring mutual reporting and follow-up actions of suspicious activities by sport bodies, operators and regulators, including gathering reliable figures on the scale of the problem; establishing minimum conflict of interest provisions, e.g betting bans for sport people and sport officials as well as the exclusion of youth events from betting; and introducing hotlines and other reporting or whistle-blowing alert mechanisms.

The Commission will also:

participate in the work of the Council of Europe on a possible Convention against manipulation of sports results; promote international cooperation and dialogue in the prevention of match fixing.

Member States are urged to:

set up national contact points bringing together all relevant actors involved in fighting match fixing; equip national legal and administrative systems with the tools, expertise and resources to combat match fixing; consider sustainable financing of sports integrity measures.

Lastly, the Commission will publish a report within two years, assessing these actions, notably with regard to the objectives of a more effective protection of consumers and deterrence of match-fixing. It will also assess whether these actions provide an adequate EU framework for online gambling or if additional measures, where necessary legislative ones, need to be taken at EU level.

2012/10/10
   EP - FOX Ashley (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
562 2012/2322(INI)
2013/03/27 CULT 137 amendments...
source: PE-507.969
2013/04/18 IMCO 425 amendments...
source: PE-508.193

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

docs/0
date
2012-10-23T00:00:00
docs
summary
type
Non-legislative basic document
body
EC
docs/5
date
2012-12-19T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2012)0596 title: COM(2012)0596
type
Contribution
body
DE_BUNDESRAT
docs/6
date
2012-12-18T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2012)0596 title: COM(2012)0596
type
Contribution
body
DE_BUNDESRAT
docs/6
date
2014-10-22T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2012)0596 title: COM(2012)0596
type
Contribution
body
DE_BUNDESRAT
docs/7
date
2014-10-21T00:00:00
docs
url: https://connectfolx.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2012)0596 title: COM(2012)0596
type
Contribution
body
DE_BUNDESRAT
committees/0/shadows/4
name
DE JONG Dennis
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.088
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-PR-506088_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.193
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AM-508193_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.088&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CULT-AD-504088_EN.html
docs/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.167&secondRef=02
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AD-506167_EN.html
events/1/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/2/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/3
date
2013-06-11T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0218_EN.html title: A7-0218/2013
summary
events/3
date
2013-06-11T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0218_EN.html title: A7-0218/2013
summary
events/5
date
2013-09-10T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0348_EN.html title: T7-0348/2013
summary
events/5
date
2013-09-10T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0348_EN.html title: T7-0348/2013
summary
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/Other legal basis
Rules of Procedure EP 159
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: FOX Ashley date: 2012-10-10T00:00:00 group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2012-10-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FOX Ashley group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: BELET Ivo date: 2012-12-12T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2012-12-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BELET Ivo group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: BORYS Piotr date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2013-01-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BORYS Piotr group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
docs/4/body
EC
events/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0596/COM_COM(2012)0596_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0596/COM_COM(2012)0596_EN.pdf
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-218&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0218_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-348
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0348_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2012-10-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0596/COM_COM(2012)0596_EN.pdf title: COM(2012)0596 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52012DC0596:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: BARNIER Michel type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2013-01-15T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2012-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE name: BELET Ivo body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa group: S&D name: SCHALDEMOSE Christel group: ALDE name: CREUTZMANN Jürgen group: Verts/ALE name: RÜHLE Heide group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2012-10-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: ECR name: FOX Ashley body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BORYS Piotr body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • date: 2013-05-30T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2012-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE name: BELET Ivo body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa group: S&D name: SCHALDEMOSE Christel group: ALDE name: CREUTZMANN Jürgen group: Verts/ALE name: RÜHLE Heide group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2012-10-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: ECR name: FOX Ashley body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BORYS Piotr body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
  • date: 2013-06-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-218&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0218/2013 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2013-09-10T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23072&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-348 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0348/2013 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union commissioner: BARNIER Michel
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2012-10-10T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FOX Ashley group: European Conservatives and Reformists abbr: ECR
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
CULT
date
2012-12-12T00:00:00
committee_full
Culture and Education
rapporteur
group: PPE name: BELET Ivo
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
IMCO
date
2012-10-10T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
group: ECR name: FOX Ashley
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2012-12-12T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BELET Ivo group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2013-01-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BORYS Piotr group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2013-01-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE name: BORYS Piotr
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
opinion
False
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs
committee
LIBE
docs
  • date: 2013-02-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.088 title: PE506.088 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2013-04-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.193 title: PE508.193 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2013-04-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.088&secondRef=02 title: PE504.088 committee: CULT type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2013-04-29T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.167&secondRef=02 title: PE506.167 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2013-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=23072&j=0&l=en title: SP(2013)816 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2012-12-19T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2012)0596 title: COM(2012)0596 type: Contribution body: DE_BUNDESRAT
  • date: 2014-10-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2012)0596 title: COM(2012)0596 type: Contribution body: DE_BUNDESRAT
events
  • date: 2012-10-23T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0596/COM_COM(2012)0596_EN.pdf title: COM(2012)0596 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2012&nu_doc=596 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: Commission Communication on a strategy to meet the regulatory and technical challenges of the online gambling sector. CONTENT: online gambling is a fast growing service activity in the EU, with annual growth rates of almost 15% and estimated annual revenues in 2015 in the region of EUR 13 billion, compared to EUR 9.3 billion in 2011. This would represent a total growth rate of almost 40%. It is estimated that about 6.84 million European consumers participate in online gambling. The nature of the online environment means that gambling sites may operate in the EU, outside any form of control carried out by regulators within the EU. Consumers in Europe also search across borders for online gambling services which, if not properly regulated, may expose them to significant risks. The extensive range of offers and the rising level of demand for online gambling services pose a number of challenges when it comes to ensuring the proper implementation of public policy objectives at the national, EU and international level. Following the Commission Green Paper in 2011 and the European Parliament resolution on online gambling in the internal market, this Communication identifies the key challenges posed by the co-existence of national regulatory frameworks within the internal market. It also seeks to propose answers to these challenges in the form of actions to be taken both at the national and EU level. The paper points out that while Member States are in principle free to set the objectives of their policy on games of chance and to define in detail the level of protection sought, national regulatory frameworks have to comply with EU law and internal market rules. Ensuring compliance of national law with the Treaty is therefore essential to a successful EU policy on online gambling. In view of the type of challenges posed by the development of online gambling and their implications for each Member State, it is not possible for Member States effectively to address these challenges alone and to provide individually a properly regulated and sufficiently safe offer of online gambling services. The Communication proposes a combination of initiatives and measures covering a range of issues, seeking to enhance legal clarity and establish policies based on available evidence. These actions, fully taking into account the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, highlight five priority areas to address the challenges in the EU. (1) Compliance of national regulatory frameworks with EU law: online gambling regulation in Member States is characterised by a diversity of regulatory frameworks. Recent regulatory changes in Member States have led to an increase in the offer of gambling services by operators authorised in an EU Member State over the last few years and to considerable differences in national regulations. Furthermore, cross-border offers are often not authorised under national rules in the recipient Member State. Compliance of these national rules with the Treaty has been challenged in front of national 6 courts and questions on the interpretation of EU law have been referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The ECJ has confirmed that national rules that prohibit the provision of gambling services authorised in other Member States were found to restrict the freedom of national residents to receive, over the internet, services offered in other Member States. They also restrict the freedom of operators established in other Member States to provide gambling services. The national rules in question focus mainly on consumer protection objectives, in particular the prevention of problem gambling and the protection of minors, and on crime and fraud prevention. While Member States usually offer legitimate reasons for the restriction of cross border gambling services, they must nonetheless demonstrate the necessity of the measure in question, in particular the existence of a problem linked to the public interest objective at stake and the consistency of the regulatory system. The Commission has launched infringement cases against a significant number of Member States, and will accelerate its assessment of national provisions in the pending infringements cases and complaints and take enforcement action wherever necessary. (2) Enhancing administrative cooperation and efficient enforcement : enhancing administrative cooperation will assist Member States and gambling regulators in their regulatory and supervisory role and improve the quality of their work. Practical cooperation will enable Member States to become familiar with the systems of others, and to develop closer working relations at the operational level. The Commission will: facilitate administrative cooperation between gambling regulators; enhance exchange of information and best practice on enforcement measures and explore the benefits and possible limits of responsive enforcement measures, such as payment blocking and disabling access to websites, at EU level; provide clarification on the procedures for notifying and acting on unauthorised content hosted in the EU by online intermediaries; develop regulatory dialogue with third countries. Member States are urged to: provide gambling regulatory authorities with clear competences and ensure cooperation with other relevant competent authorities; explore means to inform consumers about available authorised offers in order to direct demand to the legal market. (3) Protecting consumers and citizens, minors and vulnerable groups : appropriate action in the EU is needed so as to: (i) draw consumers away from unregulated and potentially harmful offers; (ii) protect minors from accessing gambling facilities, recalling that the protection of minors must be a priority not least because 75% of 6-17 year olds in Europe use the internet; (iii) safeguard other vulnerable groups and (iv) prevent the development of gambling-related disorders, since it can be estimated that between 0.5-3% of the population in the EU suffer from some type of gambling disorder. The paper notes also that responsible advertising is imperative in order to ensure that citizens are aware that: age restrictions apply; gambling can be harmful if not played responsibly and the risks can be financial, social or health related. As a first step the Commission will prepare a Recommendation on common protection of consumers, which should include a set of principles including effective and efficient registration of players, age verification and identification controls – in particular in the context of money transactions, reality checks (account activity, warning signs, signposting to helplines), no credit policy, protection of player funds, self-restriction possibilities (time/financial limits, exclusion) as well as customer support and efficient handling of complaints. The Commission will also prepare a Recommendation on responsible gambling advertising in 2013 to ensure that operators authorised in a given Member State advertise gambling in a socially responsible manner and provide key information to consumers. The Commission will, inter alia: support benchmarking and testing of parental control tools through the Safer Internet Programme and the Connecting Europe Facility to improve age rating and content classification systems; assess recommendations on gambling-related internet addiction among adolescents under EU NET ADB in 2012. Member States are urged to: strengthen information and awareness raising initiatives on the risks related to gambling, as well as on unregulated gambling offers; improve cooperation between gambling regulatory authorities and consumer organisations; increase the availability and use of online safety practices of children and young people to prevent them from accessing gambling sites; carry out surveys and data collection on gambling disorders. (4) Preventing fraud and money laundering : the main public interest objectives of Member States with regard to public order are the prevention of gambling fraud and money laundering. Credit card fraud and theft of banking credentials are reported to be the most common crime in relation to on-line gambling. Online gambling may also be used for laundering of funds stemming from illegal activities. These criminal offences are often committed cross-border and involve organised crime. The Commission will: consider extending the scope of the AML Directive to all forms of gambling in 2012; in the context of its policy on cybercrime, encourage exchanges of experience; explore the possibility of an EU standard on gambling equipment including gambling software in 2013. (5) Safeguarding the integrity of sports and preventing match-fixing : betting related match fixing is a specific type of fraud that goes against the interests of sport organisations, sportspeople, players (consumers) and regulated gambling operators. The Commission will develop a Recommendation anti-match fixing measures with a view to: promoting a more efficient exchange of good practices in the prevention of betting related match-fixing, including initiatives on awareness raising and training for actors in the field of sports; ensuring mutual reporting and follow-up actions of suspicious activities by sport bodies, operators and regulators, including gathering reliable figures on the scale of the problem; establishing minimum conflict of interest provisions, e.g betting bans for sport people and sport officials as well as the exclusion of youth events from betting; and introducing hotlines and other reporting or whistle-blowing alert mechanisms. The Commission will also: participate in the work of the Council of Europe on a possible Convention against manipulation of sports results; promote international cooperation and dialogue in the prevention of match fixing. Member States are urged to: set up national contact points bringing together all relevant actors involved in fighting match fixing; equip national legal and administrative systems with the tools, expertise and resources to combat match fixing; consider sustainable financing of sports integrity measures. Lastly, the Commission will publish a report within two years, assessing these actions, notably with regard to the objectives of a more effective protection of consumers and deterrence of match-fixing. It will also assess whether these actions provide an adequate EU framework for online gambling or if additional measures, where necessary legislative ones, need to be taken at EU level.
  • date: 2013-01-15T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-05-30T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2013-06-11T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-218&language=EN title: A7-0218/2013 summary: The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report by Ashley FOX (ECR, UK) on online gambling in the internal market. Members stress that gambling is not an ordinary economic activity. Given the special nature of the online gambling sector, the protection of human health and consumers should be the main guiding principle when EU-level recommendations and national legislation are made. In this context, Members consider that, in order to ensure a high level of consumer protection, in particular for those consumers who are the most vulnerable , it is appropriate to ensure a fair and legal offer of gambling services defined by each Member State in compliance with Union law might. They warn that gambling can lead to dangerous addiction, which is an issue that would need to be addressed in any legislative proposal for the sake of consumers and the integrity of this form of sport. The report calls for a series of actions from Member States and the Commission, as appropriate, to: · take action against illegal gambling offered from within Member State territories; · ensure a high level of consumer and health protection in the Union; · continue to explore measures at EU level to protect vulnerable consumers ; · oblige operators working with a licence from the Member State to carry the logo, trustmark of the regulatory authority in a prominent fixed position on its website; · stop the practice whereby companies based in one Member State market online-gambling services – for example via satellite-TV or advertisement campaigns – in another Member State in which they are not licensed to offer such services; · ensure operators are obliged to display clear, prominent and explicit warnings to minors stating that it is illegal for them to engage in online gambling; · carry out, in a coordinated manner, further studies to understand problem gambling; · explore the possibility of EU-wide interoperability between national self-exclusion registers so that any customer self-excluding or surpassing their gambling limits at one gambling operator has the opportunity to be automatically self-excluded from all other licensed gambling operators; · consider implementing a compulsory third-party identification control in order to exclude minors or persons using fake identities from playing; · ensure gambling operators are obliged actively to promote the use of self-restrictions at the time of registration as well as in cases of repeated losses. Common standards : Members take the view that common standards for online gambling should address the rights and obligations of both the service provider and the consumer , ensuring a high level of protection for citizens and consumers, in particular minors and other vulnerable persons, and the prevention of misleading and excessive advertisements. They encourage the European gambling operators’ associations to develop and adopt self-regulatory codes of conduct. Members recommend the introduction of uniform, pan-European common security standards for electronic identification and cross border e-verification services . They also recommend the exchange of best practices on enforcement measures – such as on establishing white and black lists of, and preventing access to, illegal gambling websites, jointly defining secure and traceable payment solutions, and considering the feasibility of blocking financial transactions. The report goes on to call on Member States and on operators to encourage responsible advertising in relation to online gambling. It asks the Commission to include common minimum standards that provide sufficient protection for vulnerable consumers containing clear warnings to minors. For minors, the report particularly recommends: (i) introduction of school courses aimed at young people on the best uses of the Internet; (ii) effective measures to raise awareness of the risks of gambling addiction; (iii) defining a non-harmful format for advertising, and preventing people under 18 from gambling and combating problematic and compulsive gambling. In terms of legal action, Member States are asked to only authorise operators who fulfil at least the following requirements and are thus considered to be legal: · the operator must have a licence which gives it a right to operate in the Member State of the player; · the operator is not considered to be illegal under the law applicable in any other Member State. Compliance with EU law: Members recognise that with due regard to the principle of subsidiarity, Member States have the right to determine how the offer of online gambling services is organised and regulated in accordance with their own values and pursued objectives of general interest, while observing Union law. The Commission is asked to continue to monitor and enforce compliance of national laws and practices with EU law, in cooperation with the Member States, and to launch infringement procedures against those Member States that appear to breach EU law. Members want the Commission and Member states to be more ambitious and draw up coordinated measures and strategies , with a view to addressing the social costs and harmful effects of gambling activities. Those Member States that choose to open up their online gambling sector must provide for a transparent and legally certain licensing application procedure based on objective and non-discriminatory criteria, in full compliance with EU law and with sufficient and strict citizen and consumer protection. Administrative cooperation : recalling the Commission initiative to set up an expert group on gambling in order to share best practice and and information on establishing a common system on identification of players as well as technical measures, Members ask the Commission to include experts specialised in problem and pathological gambling in expert groups and consultations. Stressing the need for cooperation and exchanges of best practices among national experts from the social and health spheres, Members encourage the Member States to work in close cooperation with the Commission and with each other to coordinate steps to combat the unauthorised supply of cross-border gambling services . At the same time, they stress the importance for the expert group to work towards more transparent and simplified procedures that remove unnecessary administrative burdens on Member States that could unnecessarily increase costs for legal online operators in those countries which choose to open up their markets. They believe that steps should be taken to bring national tax regimes for gambling services into line with one other in order to prevent disproportionate tax concessions from fostering a proliferation and concentration of online gambling services. Money laundering: Members point out that online gambling is a non-cash-based environment and that – given the dependency on third-party financial service providers – additional safeguards against money laundering are needed . They call on the Commission, the Member States and the expert group to take effective action against money laundering. The report welcomes, in this respect, the proposal to extend the provisions of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive to include all forms of gambling. It emphasises that solid registration and unambiguous verification systems are key tools in preventing any misuse of online gambling, and advantage can be taken of online bank and credit-card verification systems. Integrity of sports : Members deal with the problem of match-fixing , taking account of its transnational nature. They note that match fixing occurs in both the offline and the online gambling markets and that, in the majority of cases, online betting-related match-fixing occurs through gambling operators established in unregulated markets outside the EU . They call for the following principal measures: · a code of conduct, containing a general ban on all staff involved in sporting events from placing bets on their own matches or events; · the adoption at national level of effective measures to prevent conflicts of interest, notably by avoiding wagers of all stakeholders from the world of sports on betting organised on competitions in which they are involved; · ban all forms of live sports betting since these have proved to be very vulnerable to match-fixing and therefore pose a risk to the integrity of sport; · an obligation for cooperation on suspicious activities with Europol and Eurojust; · the creation of a global platform for exchange of information and best practices and in the coordination of joint prevention and enforcement actions; · ensure that the fraudulent manipulation of results for financial or other advantage is prohibited by establishing as a criminal offence any threat to the integrity of competitions; · take action at EU level against unregulated online gambling and to support the fight against match-fixing. Members recommend that sporting competitions should be protected from any unauthorised commercial use, notably by recognising the property rights of sports event organisers . Lastly, Member States are asked to consider a ban on all forms of spot fixing , such as gambling on corner kicks, free kicks, throw-ins and yellow cards, as these has proven to be very vulnerable to match-fixing. The report calls up the Commission to install a European alert system for betting regulators in order rapidly to exchange information about fixed sporting events.
  • date: 2013-09-10T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23072&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2013-09-10T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-348 title: T7-0348/2013 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 572 votes to 79, with 61 abstentions, a resolution on online gambling in the internal market. Parliament stresses that gambling is not an ordinary economic activity. Given the special nature of the online gambling sector, the protection of human health and consumers should be the main guiding principle when EU-level recommendations and national legislation are made. In this context, Parliament considers that, in order to ensure a high level of consumer protection, in particular for those consumers who are the most vulnerable , it is appropriate to ensure a fair and legal offer of gambling services defined by each Member State in compliance with Union law might. It warns that gambling can lead to dangerous addiction, which is an issue that would need to be addressed in any legislative proposal for the sake of consumers . The resolution calls for a series of actions from Member States and the Commission, as appropriate, to: · take action against illegal gambling offered from within Member State territories; · ensure a high level of consumer and health protection in the Union; · continue to explore measures at EU level to protect vulnerable consumers ; · oblige operators working with a licence from the Member State to carry the logo, trustmark of the regulatory authority in a prominent fixed position on its website; · stop the practice whereby companies based in one Member State market online-gambling services – for example via satellite-TV or advertisement campaigns – in another Member State in which they are not licensed to offer such services; · ensure operators are obliged to display clear, prominent and explicit warnings to minors stating that it is illegal for them to engage in online gambling; · carry out, in a coordinated manner, further studies to understand problem gambling; · explore the possibility of EU-wide interoperability between national self-exclusion registers so that any customer self-excluding or surpassing their gambling limits at one gambling operator has the opportunity to be automatically self-excluded from all other licensed gambling operators; · consider implementing a compulsory third-party identification control in order to exclude minors or persons using fake identities from playing; · ensure gambling operators are obliged actively to promote the use of self-restrictions at the time of registration as well as in cases of repeated losses. Common standards : Parliament takes the view that common standards for online gambling should address the rights and obligations of both the service provider and the consumer , ensuring a high level of protection for citizens and consumers, in particular minors and other vulnerable persons, and the prevention of misleading and excessive advertisements. It encourages the European gambling operators’ associations to develop and adopt self-regulatory codes of conduct. Parliament recommends the introduction of uniform, pan-European common security standards for electronic identification and cross border e-verification services . It calls for registration and identification procedures to be streamlined and made more efficient, notably in order to ensure efficient identification mechanisms and to prevent multiple accounts per player and access by minors to online gambling websites . It also recommends the exchange of best practices between Member States on enforcement measures – such as on establishing white and black lists of illegal gambling websites, jointly defining secure and traceable payment solutions, and considering the feasibility of blocking financial transactions – in order to protect consumers against illegal operators. Parliament goes on to call on Member States and on operators to encourage responsible advertising in relation to online gambling. It asks the Commission to include common minimum standards that provide sufficient protection for vulnerable consumers containing clear warnings to minors. For minors, the resolution particularly recommends: (i) introduction of school courses aimed at young people on the best uses of the Internet; (ii) effective measures to raise awareness of the risks of gambling addiction; (iii) defining a non-harmful format for advertising, and preventing people under 18 from gambling and combating problematic and compulsive gambling. In terms of legal action, Member States are asked to only authorise operators who fulfil at least the following requirements and are thus considered to be legal: · the operator must have a licence which gives it a right to operate in the Member State of the player; · the operator is not considered to be illegal under the law applicable in any other Member State. Compliance with EU law : Parliament recognises that with due regard to the principle of subsidiarity, Member States have the right to determine how the offer of online gambling services is organised and regulated in accordance with their own values and pursued objectives of general interest, while observing Union law. The Commission is asked to continue to monitor and enforce compliance of national laws and practices with EU law, in cooperation with the Member States, and to launch infringement procedures against those Member States that appear to breach EU law. All legislation must be proportionate, consistent, transparent, and non-discriminatory. Parliament wants the Commission and Member states to be more ambitious and draw up coordinated measures and strategies , with a view to addressing the social costs and harmful effects of gambling activities. Those Member States that choose to open up their online gambling sector must provide for a transparent and legally certain licensing application procedure based on objective and non-discriminatory criteria, in full compliance with EU law and with sufficient and strict citizen and consumer protection. Administrative cooperation : recalling the Commission initiative to set up an expert group on gambling in order to share best practice and and information on establishing a common system on identification of players as well as technical measures, Parliament asks the Commission to include experts specialised in problem and pathological gambling in expert groups and consultations. Stressing the need for cooperation and exchanges of best practices among national experts from the social and health spheres, Members encourage the Member States to work in close cooperation with the Commission and with each other to coordinate steps to combat the unauthorised supply of cross-border gambling services . At the same time, it stresses the importance for the expert group to work towards more transparent and simplified procedures that remove unnecessary administrative burdens on Member States that could unnecessarily increase costs for legal online operators in those countries which choose to open up their markets. It believes that steps should be taken to bring national tax regimes for gambling services into line with one other in order to prevent disproportionate tax concessions from fostering a proliferation and concentration of online gambling services. Money laundering : Parliament recalls that online gambling is a non-cash-based environment and that – given the dependency on third-party financial service providers – additional safeguards against money laundering are needed . It calls on the Commission, the Member States and the expert group to take effective action against money laundering. The resolution welcomes, in this respect, the proposal to extend the provisions of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive to include all forms of gambling. It emphasises that solid registration and unambiguous verification systems are key tools in preventing any misuse of online gambling, and advantage can be taken of online bank and credit-card verification systems. Integrity of sports : Parliament deals with the problem of match-fixing , taking account of its transnational nature. It notes that match fixing occurs in both the offline and the online gambling markets and that, in the majority of cases, online betting-related match-fixing occurs through gambling operators established in unregulated markets outside the EU . Against this background, Parliament calls for the following principal measures: the strict regulation or the prohibition , after an evaluation conducted at the level of each Member State, of dangerous forms of gambling a code of conduct, containing a general ban on all staff involved in sporting events from placing bets on their own matches or events; the adoption at national level of effective measures to prevent conflicts of interest, notably by avoiding wagers of all stakeholders from the world of sports on betting organised on competitions in which they are involved; ban all forms of live sports betting since these have proved to be very vulnerable to match-fixing and therefore pose a risk to the integrity of sport; an obligation for cooperation on suspicious activities with Europol and Eurojust; the creation of a global platform for exchange of information and best practices and in the coordination of joint prevention and enforcement actions; ensure that the fraudulent manipulation of results for financial or other advantage is prohibited by establishing as a criminal offence any threat to the integrity of competitions; take action at EU level against unregulated online gambling and to support the fight against match-fixing. Parliament recommends that sporting competitions should be protected from any unauthorised commercial use, notably by recognising the property rights of sports event organisers . It calls on sport federations and gambling operators to include, in a code of conduct , a ban on betting on so-called negative events, such as yellow cards, penalty kicks or free kicks during a match or event and to ban all forms of live sports betting since these have proved to be very vulnerable to match-fixing and therefore pose a risk to the integrity of sport. In this regard, Parliament calls on the Commission to install a European alert system for betting regulators in order rapidly to exchange information about fixed sporting events. Lastly, Parliament welcomes transnational education projects to combat match-fixing on a global level.
  • date: 2013-09-10T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BARNIER Michel
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
IMCO/7/11454
New
  • IMCO/7/11454
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 1.20.09 Protection of privacy and data protection
  • 2.40 Free movement of services, freedom to provide
  • 2.70.02 Indirect taxation, VAT, excise duties
  • 3.30.05 Electronic and mobile communications, personal communications
  • 3.30.25 International information networks and society, internet
  • 4.10.13 Sport
  • 4.60.02 Consumer information, advertising, labelling
  • 4.60.06 Consumers' economic and legal interests
  • 7.30.30.06 Action to combat economic fraud
New
1.20.09
Protection of privacy and data protection
2.40
Free movement of services, freedom to provide
2.70.02
Indirect taxation, VAT, excise duties
3.30.05
Electronic and mobile communications, personal communications
3.30.25
International information networks and society, internet
4.10.13
Sport
4.60.02
Consumer information, advertising, labelling
4.60.06
Consumers' economic and legal interests
7.30.30.06
Action to combat economic fraud and corruption
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0596:EN
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0596/COM_COM(2012)0596_EN.pdf
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0596/COM_COM(2012)0596_EN.pdf
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0596:EN
procedure/subject/5
Old
4.10.13 Sports
New
4.10.13 Sport
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/4/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
activities/2/committees/2/shadows/4/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
committees/2/shadows/4/mepref
Old
545fbdc8d1d1c57505000000
New
4f1ac952b819f25efd00012c
activities/0
date
2012-10-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0596/COM_COM(2012)0596_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52012DC0596:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2012)0596
body
EC
type
Non-legislative basic document
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: BARNIER Michel
activities/0/body
Old
EP
New
EC
activities/0/commission
  • DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: BARNIER Michel
activities/0/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2012-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: EPP name: BELET Ivo
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa group: S&D name: SCHALDEMOSE Christel group: ALDE name: CREUTZMANN Jürgen group: Verts/ALE name: RÜHLE Heide group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2012-10-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: ECR name: FOX Ashley
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: BORYS Piotr
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
activities/0/date
Old
2013-01-15T00:00:00
New
2012-10-23T00:00:00
activities/0/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0596/COM_COM(2012)0596_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52012DC0596:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2012)0596
activities/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Non-legislative basic document published
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2012-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE name: BELET Ivo
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa group: S&D name: SCHALDEMOSE Christel group: ALDE name: CREUTZMANN Jürgen group: Verts/ALE name: RÜHLE Heide group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2012-10-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: ECR name: FOX Ashley
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BORYS Piotr
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
activities/1/date
Old
2013-04-18T00:00:00
New
2013-01-15T00:00:00
activities/1/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.193 type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE508.193
activities/1/type
Old
Amendments tabled in committee
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2
date
2013-02-27T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.088 type: Committee draft report title: PE506.088
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/2/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2012-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: PPE name: BELET Ivo
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa group: S&D name: SCHALDEMOSE Christel group: ALDE name: CREUTZMANN Jürgen group: Verts/ALE name: RÜHLE Heide group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2012-10-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: ECR name: FOX Ashley
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: BORYS Piotr
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
activities/2/date
Old
2013-09-10T00:00:00
New
2013-05-30T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0348/2013
activities/2/type
Old
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/4/committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2012-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: EPP name: BELET Ivo
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa group: S&D name: SCHALDEMOSE Christel group: ALDE name: CREUTZMANN Jürgen group: Verts/ALE name: RÜHLE Heide group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2012-10-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: ECR name: FOX Ashley
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: BORYS Piotr
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
activities/4/date
Old
2013-05-30T00:00:00
New
2013-09-10T00:00:00
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=23072&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-348 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0348/2013
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0/committee
Old
IMCO
New
CULT
committees/0/committee_full
Old
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
New
Culture and Education
committees/0/date
Old
2012-10-10T00:00:00
New
2012-12-12T00:00:00
committees/0/rapporteur/0/group
Old
ECR
New
PPE
committees/0/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de184c70fb8127435bdbe09
New
4f1ac643b819f25efd00002d
committees/0/rapporteur/0/name
Old
FOX Ashley
New
BELET Ivo
committees/0/responsible
Old
True
New
 
committees/0/shadows
  • group: EPP name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa
  • group: S&D name: SCHALDEMOSE Christel
  • group: ALDE name: CREUTZMANN Jürgen
  • group: Verts/ALE name: RÜHLE Heide
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis
  • group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo
committees/2/committee
Old
JURI
New
IMCO
committees/2/committee_full
Old
Legal Affairs
New
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committees/2/date
Old
2013-01-14T00:00:00
New
2012-10-10T00:00:00
committees/2/rapporteur/0/group
Old
EPP
New
ECR
committees/2/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de183800fb8127435bdbc2c
New
4f1ac814b819f25efd0000c7
committees/2/rapporteur/0/name
Old
BORYS Piotr
New
FOX Ashley
committees/2/responsible
Old
 
New
True
committees/2/shadows
  • group: PPE name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa
  • group: S&D name: SCHALDEMOSE Christel
  • group: ALDE name: CREUTZMANN Jürgen
  • group: Verts/ALE name: RÜHLE Heide
  • group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Dennis
  • group: EFD name: SALVINI Matteo
committees/4/committee
Old
CULT
New
JURI
committees/4/committee_full
Old
Culture and Education
New
Legal Affairs
committees/4/date
Old
2012-12-12T00:00:00
New
2013-01-14T00:00:00
committees/4/rapporteur/0/group
Old
EPP
New
PPE
committees/4/rapporteur/0/mepref
Old
4de183560fb8127435bdbbef
New
4f1ac681b819f25efd000044
committees/4/rapporteur/0/name
Old
BELET Ivo
New
BORYS Piotr
procedure/Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
New
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
activities/6/docs
  • type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0348/2013
activities/6/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Text adopted by Parliament, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/6/date
Old
2013-09-09T00:00:00
New
2013-09-10T00:00:00
activities/6/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/6
date
2013-09-09T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/5/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection adopted an own-initiative report by Ashley FOX (ECR, UK) on online gambling in the internal market.

    Members stress that gambling is not an ordinary economic activity. Given the special nature of the online gambling sector, the protection of human health and consumers should be the main guiding principle when EU-level recommendations and national legislation are made. In this context, Members consider that, in order to ensure a high level of consumer protection, in particular for those consumers who are the most vulnerable, it is appropriate to ensure a fair and legal offer of gambling services defined by each Member State in compliance with Union law might. They warn that gambling can lead to dangerous addiction, which is an issue that would need to be addressed in any legislative proposal for the sake of consumers and the integrity of this form of sport.

    The report calls for a series of actions from Member States and the Commission, as appropriate, to:

    ·        take action against illegal gambling offered from within Member State territories;

    ·        ensure a high level of consumer and health protection in the Union;

    ·        continue to explore measures at EU level to protect vulnerable consumers;

    ·        oblige operators working with a licence from the Member State to carry the logo, trustmark of the regulatory authority in a prominent fixed position on its website;

    ·        stop the practice whereby companies based in one Member State market online-gambling services – for example via satellite-TV or advertisement campaigns – in another Member State in which they are not licensed to offer such services;

    ·        ensure operators are obliged to display clear, prominent and explicit warnings to minors stating that it is illegal for them to engage in online gambling;

    ·        carry out, in a coordinated manner, further studies to understand problem gambling;

    ·        explore the possibility of EU-wide interoperability between national self-exclusion registers so that any customer self-excluding or surpassing their gambling limits at one gambling operator has the opportunity to be automatically self-excluded from all other licensed gambling operators;

    ·        consider implementing a compulsory third-party identification control in order to exclude minors or persons using fake identities from playing;

    ·        ensure gambling operators are obliged actively to promote the use of self-restrictions at the time of registration as well as in cases of repeated losses.

    Common standards:  Members take the view that common standards for online gambling should address the rights and obligations of both the service provider and the consumer, ensuring a high level of protection for citizens and consumers, in particular minors and other vulnerable persons, and the prevention of misleading and excessive advertisements. They encourage the European gambling operators’ associations to develop and adopt self-regulatory codes of conduct.

    Members recommend the introduction of uniform, pan-European common security standards for electronic identification and cross border e-verification services. They also recommend the exchange of best practices on enforcement measures – such as on establishing white and black lists of, and preventing access to, illegal gambling websites, jointly defining secure and traceable payment solutions, and considering the feasibility of blocking financial transactions.

    The report goes on to call on Member States and on operators to encourage responsible advertising in relation to online gambling. It asks the Commission to include common minimum standards that provide sufficient protection for vulnerable consumers containing clear warnings to minors.

    For minors, the report particularly recommends: (i) introduction of school courses aimed at young people on the best uses of the Internet;  (ii) effective measures to raise awareness of the risks of gambling addiction; (iii) defining a non-harmful format for advertising, and preventing people under 18 from gambling and  combating problematic and compulsive gambling.

    In terms of legal action, Member States are asked to only authorise operators who fulfil at least the following requirements and are thus considered to be legal:

    ·        the operator must have a licence which gives it a right to operate in the Member State of the player;

    ·        the operator is not considered to be illegal under the law applicable in any other Member State.

    Compliance with EU law: Members recognise that with due regard to the principle of subsidiarity, Member States have the right to determine how the offer of online gambling services is organised and regulated in accordance with their own values and pursued objectives of general interest, while observing Union law. The Commission is asked to continue to monitor and enforce compliance of national laws and practices with EU law, in cooperation with the Member States, and to launch infringement procedures against those Member States that appear to breach EU law.

    Members want the Commission and Member states to be more ambitious and draw up coordinated measures and strategies, with a view to addressing the social costs and harmful effects of gambling activities. Those Member States that choose to open up their online gambling sector must provide for a transparent and legally certain licensing application procedure based on objective and non-discriminatory criteria, in full compliance with EU law and with sufficient and strict citizen and consumer protection.

    Administrative cooperation: recalling the Commission initiative to set up an expert group on gambling in order to share best practice and and information on establishing a common system on identification of players as well as technical measures, Members ask the Commission to include experts specialised in problem and pathological gambling in expert groups and consultations. Stressing the need for cooperation and exchanges of best practices among national experts from the social and health spheres, Members encourage the Member States to work in close cooperation with the Commission and with each other to coordinate steps to combat the unauthorised supply of cross-border gambling services.

    At the same time, they stress the importance for the expert group to work towards more transparent and simplified procedures that remove unnecessary administrative burdens on Member States that could unnecessarily increase costs for legal online operators in those countries which choose to open up their markets. They believe that steps should be taken to bring national tax regimes for gambling services into line with one other in order to prevent disproportionate tax concessions from fostering a proliferation and concentration of online gambling services.

    Money laundering: Members point out that online gambling is a non-cash-based environment and that – given the dependency on third-party financial service providers – additional safeguards against money laundering are needed. They call on the Commission, the Member States and the expert group to take effective action against money laundering.

    The report welcomes, in this respect, the proposal to extend the provisions of the Anti-Money Laundering Directive to include all forms of gambling. It emphasises that solid registration and unambiguous verification systems are key tools in preventing any misuse of online gambling, and advantage can be taken of online bank and credit-card verification systems.

    Integrity of sports: Members deal with the problem of match-fixing, taking account of its transnational nature. They note that match fixing occurs in both the offline and the online gambling markets and that, in the majority of cases, online betting-related match-fixing occurs through gambling operators established in unregulated markets outside the EU.

    They call for the following principal measures:

    ·        a code of conduct, containing a general ban on all staff  involved in sporting events from placing bets on their own matches or events;

    ·        the adoption at national level of effective measures to prevent conflicts of interest, notably by avoiding wagers of all stakeholders from the world of sports on betting organised on competitions in which they are involved;

    ·        ban all forms of live sports betting since these have proved to be very vulnerable to match-fixing and therefore pose a risk to the integrity of sport;

    ·        an obligation for cooperation on suspicious activities with Europol and Eurojust;

    ·        the creation of a global platform for exchange of information and best practices and in the coordination of joint prevention and enforcement actions; 

    ·        ensure that the fraudulent manipulation of results for financial or other advantage is prohibited by establishing as a criminal offence any threat to the integrity of competitions;

    ·        take action at EU level against unregulated online gambling and to support the fight against match-fixing.

    Members recommend that sporting competitions should be protected from any unauthorised commercial use, notably by recognising the property rights of sports event organisers.

    Lastly, Member States are asked to consider a ban on all forms of spot fixing, such as gambling on corner kicks, free kicks, throw-ins and yellow cards, as these has proven to be very vulnerable to match-fixing. The report calls up the Commission to install a European alert system for betting regulators in order rapidly to exchange information about fixed sporting events.

activities/5/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-218&language=EN
activities/0
date
2012-10-23T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0596/COM_COM(2012)0596_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52012DC0596:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2012)0596
body
EC
type
Non-legislative basic document
commission
DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: BARNIER Michel
activities/0/body
Old
EP
New
EC
activities/0/commission
  • DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: BARNIER Michel
activities/0/date
Old
2013-02-27T00:00:00
New
2012-10-23T00:00:00
activities/0/docs/0/celexid
CELEX:52012DC0596:EN
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: Commission Communication on a strategy to meet the regulatory and technical challenges of the online gambling sector.

    CONTENT: online gambling is a fast growing service activity in the EU, with annual growth rates of almost 15% and estimated annual revenues in 2015 in the region of EUR 13 billion, compared to EUR 9.3 billion in 2011. This would represent a total growth rate of almost 40%. It is estimated that about 6.84 million European consumers participate in online gambling.

    The nature of the online environment means that gambling sites may operate in the EU, outside any form of control carried out by regulators within the EU. Consumers in Europe also search across borders for online gambling services which, if not properly regulated, may expose them to significant risks. The extensive range of offers and the rising level of demand for online gambling services pose a number of challenges when it comes to ensuring the proper implementation of public policy objectives at the national, EU and international level. 

    Following the Commission Green Paper in 2011 and the European Parliament resolution on online gambling in the internal market, this Communication identifies the key challenges posed by the co-existence of national regulatory frameworks within the internal market. It also seeks to propose answers to these challenges in the form of actions to be taken both at the national and EU level.

    The paper points out that while Member States are in principle free to set the objectives of their policy on games of chance and to define in detail the level of protection sought, national regulatory frameworks have to comply with EU law and internal market rules. Ensuring compliance of national law with the Treaty is therefore essential to a successful EU policy on online gambling. In view of the type of challenges posed by the development of online gambling and their implications for each Member State, it is not possible for Member States effectively to address these challenges alone and to provide individually a properly regulated and sufficiently safe offer of online gambling services.

    The Communication proposes a combination of initiatives and measures covering a range of issues, seeking to enhance legal clarity and establish policies based on available evidence. These actions, fully taking into account the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, highlight five priority areas to address the challenges in the EU.

    (1) Compliance of national regulatory frameworks with EU law: online gambling regulation in Member States is characterised by a diversity of regulatory frameworks. Recent regulatory changes in Member States have led to an increase in the offer of gambling services by operators authorised in an EU Member State over the last few years and to considerable differences in national regulations. Furthermore, cross-border offers are often not authorised under national rules in the recipient Member State.

    Compliance of these national rules with the Treaty has been challenged in front of national 6 courts and questions on the interpretation of EU law have been referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The ECJ has confirmed that national rules that prohibit the provision of gambling services authorised in other Member States were found to restrict the freedom of national residents to receive, over the internet, services offered in other Member States. They also restrict the freedom of operators established in other Member States to provide gambling services.

    The national rules in question focus mainly on consumer protection objectives, in particular the prevention of problem gambling and the protection of minors, and on crime and fraud prevention. While Member States usually offer legitimate reasons for the restriction of cross border gambling services, they must nonetheless demonstrate the necessity of the measure in question, in particular the existence of a problem linked to the public interest objective at stake and the consistency of the regulatory system.

    The Commission has launched infringement cases against a significant number of Member States, and will accelerate its assessment of national provisions in the pending infringements cases and complaints and take enforcement action wherever necessary. 

    (2) Enhancing administrative cooperation and efficient enforcement: enhancing administrative cooperation will assist Member States and gambling regulators in their regulatory and supervisory role and improve the quality of their work. Practical cooperation will enable Member States to become familiar with the systems of others, and to develop closer working relations at the operational level.

    The Commission will:

    • facilitate administrative  cooperation between gambling regulators;
    • enhance exchange of information and best practice on enforcement measures and explore the benefits and possible limits of responsive enforcement measures, such as payment blocking and disabling access to websites, at EU level;
    • provide clarification on the procedures for notifying and acting on unauthorised content hosted in the EU by online intermediaries;
    • develop regulatory dialogue with third countries.

    Member States are urged to:

    • provide gambling regulatory authorities with clear competences and ensure cooperation with other relevant competent authorities;
    • explore means to inform consumers about available authorised offers in order to direct demand to the legal market.

    (3) Protecting consumers and citizens, minors and vulnerable groups: appropriate action in the EU is needed so as to: (i) draw consumers away from unregulated and potentially harmful offers; (ii) protect minors from accessing gambling facilities, recalling that the protection of minors must be a priority not least because 75% of 6-17 year olds in Europe use the internet; (iii) safeguard other vulnerable groups and (iv) prevent the development of gambling-related disorders, since it can be estimated that between 0.5-3% of the population in the EU suffer from some type of gambling disorder.

    The paper notes also that responsible advertising is imperative in order to ensure that  citizens are aware that:

    • age restrictions apply;
    • gambling can be harmful if not played responsibly and
    • the risks can be financial, social or health related.

    As a first step the Commission will prepare a Recommendation on common protection of consumers, which should include a set of principles including effective and efficient registration of players, age verification and identification controls – in particular in the context of money transactions, reality checks  (account activity, warning signs, signposting to helplines), no credit policy, protection of player funds, self-restriction possibilities (time/financial limits, exclusion) as well as customer support and efficient handling of complaints.

    The Commission will also prepare a Recommendation on responsible gambling advertising in 2013 to ensure that operators authorised in a given Member State advertise gambling in a socially responsible manner and provide key information to consumers.

    The Commission will, inter alia:

    • support benchmarking and testing of parental control tools through the Safer Internet Programme and the Connecting Europe Facility to improve age rating and content classification systems;
    • assess recommendations on gambling-related internet addiction among adolescents under EU NET ADB in 2012.

    Member States are urged to:

    • strengthen information and awareness raising initiatives on the risks related to gambling, as well as on unregulated gambling offers;
    • improve cooperation between gambling regulatory authorities and consumer organisations;
    • increase the availability and use of online safety practices of children and young people to prevent them from accessing gambling sites;
    • carry out surveys and data collection on gambling disorders.

    (4) Preventing fraud and money laundering: the main public interest objectives of Member States with regard to public order are the prevention of gambling fraud and money laundering. Credit card fraud and theft of banking credentials are reported to be the most common crime in relation to on-line gambling. Online gambling may also be used for laundering of funds stemming from illegal activities. These criminal offences are often committed cross-border and involve organised crime.

    The Commission will:

    • consider extending the scope of the AML Directive to all forms of gambling in 2012;
    • in the context of its policy on cybercrime, encourage exchanges of experience;
    • explore the possibility of an EU standard on gambling equipment including gambling software in 2013.

    (5) Safeguarding the integrity of sports and preventing match-fixing: betting related match fixing is a specific type of fraud that goes against the interests of sport organisations, sportspeople, players (consumers) and regulated gambling operators. The Commission will develop a Recommendation anti-match fixing measures with a view to:

    • promoting a more efficient exchange of good practices in the prevention of betting related match-fixing, including initiatives on awareness raising and training for actors in the field of sports;
    • ensuring mutual reporting and follow-up actions of suspicious activities by sport bodies, operators and regulators, including gathering reliable  figures on the scale of the problem;
    • establishing minimum conflict of interest provisions, e.g betting bans for sport people and sport officials as well as the exclusion of youth events from betting; and
    • introducing hotlines and other reporting or whistle-blowing alert mechanisms.

    The Commission will also:

    • participate in the work of the Council of Europe on a possible Convention against manipulation of sports results;
    • promote international cooperation and dialogue in the prevention of match fixing. 

    Member States are urged to:

    • set up national contact points bringing together all relevant actors involved in fighting match fixing;
    • equip national legal and administrative systems with the tools, expertise and resources to combat match fixing;
    • consider sustainable financing of sports integrity measures. 

    Lastly, the Commission will publish a report within two years, assessing these actions, notably with regard to the objectives of a more effective protection of consumers and deterrence of match-fixing. It will also assess whether these actions provide an adequate EU framework for online gambling or if additional measures, where necessary legislative ones, need to be taken at EU level.

activities/0/docs/0/title
Old
PE506.088
New
COM(2012)0596
activities/0/docs/0/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Non-legislative basic document published
activities/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.088
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0596/COM_COM(2012)0596_EN.pdf
activities/0/type
Old
Committee draft report
New
Non-legislative basic document
activities/2/date
Old
2013-07-01T00:00:00
New
2013-02-27T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.088 type: Committee draft report title: PE506.088
activities/2/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee draft report
procedure/legal_basis/1
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 138
procedure/subject/6
Old
4.60.02 Consumer information, publicity, labelling
New
4.60.02 Consumer information, advertising, labelling
activities/5
date
2013-06-11T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0218/2013
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/4
date
2013-05-30T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
activities/3/date
Old
2013-04-11T00:00:00
New
2013-04-18T00:00:00
activities/3/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE508.193
activities/3/date
Old
2013-04-08T00:00:00
New
2013-04-11T00:00:00
activities/3
date
2013-04-08T00:00:00
docs
type: Amendments tabled in committee title: PE508.193
body
EP
type
Amendments tabled in committee
activities/2/docs/0/url
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE506.088
activities/2
date
2013-02-27T00:00:00
docs
type: Committee draft report title: PE506.088
body
EP
type
Committee draft report
activities/2/date
Old
2013-06-10T00:00:00
New
2013-07-01T00:00:00
activities/0/docs/0/text/0
Old

PURPOSE: Commission Communication on a strategy to meet the regulatory and technical challenges of the online gambling sector.

CONTENT: online gambling is a fast growing service activity in the EU, with annual growth rates of almost 15% and estimated annual revenues in 2015 in the region of EUR 13 billion, compared to EUR 9.3 billion in 2011. This would represent a total growth rate of almost 40%. It is estimated that about 6.84 million European consumers participate in online gambling.

The nature of the online environment means that gambling sites may operate in the EU, outside any form of control carried out by regulators within the EU. Consumers in Europe also search across borders for online gambling services which, if not properly regulated, may expose them to significant risks. The extensive range of offers and the rising level of demand for online gambling services pose a number of challenges when it comes to ensuring the proper implementation of public policy objectives at the national, EU and international level. 

Following the Commission Green Paper in 2011 and the European Parliament resolution on online gambling in the internal market, this Communication identifies the key challenges posed by the co-existence of national regulatory frameworks within the internal market. It also seeks to propose answers to these challenges in the form of actions to be taken both at the national and EU level.

The paper points out that while Member States are in principle free to set the objectives of their policy on games of chance and to define in detail the level of protection sought, national regulatory frameworks have to comply with EU law and internal market rules. Ensuring compliance of national law with the Treaty is therefore essential to a successful EU policy on online gambling. In view of the type of challenges posed by the development of online gambling and their implications for each Member State, it is not possible for Member States effectively to address these challenges alone and to provide individually a properly regulated and sufficiently safe offer of online gambling services.

The Communication proposes a combination of initiatives and measures covering a range of issues, seeking to enhance legal clarity and establish policies based on available evidence. These actions, fully taking into account the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, highlight five priority areas to address the challenges in the EU.

(1) Compliance of national regulatory frameworks with EU law: online gambling regulation in Member States is characterised by a diversity of regulatory frameworks. Recent regulatory changes in Member States have led to an increase in the offer of gambling services by operators authorised in an EU Member State over the last few years and to considerable differences in national regulations. Furthermore, cross-border offers are often not authorised under national rules in the recipient Member State.

Compliance of these national rules with the Treaty has been challenged in front of national 6 courts and questions on the interpretation of EU law have been referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The ECJ has confirmed that national rules that prohibit the provision of gambling services authorised in other Member States were found to restrict the freedom of national residents to receive, over the internet, services offered in other Member States. They also restrict the freedom of operators established in other Member States to provide gambling services.

The national rules in question focus mainly on consumer protection objectives, in particular the prevention of problem gambling and the protection of minors, and on crime and fraud prevention. While Member States usually offer legitimate reasons for the restriction of cross border gambling services, they must nonetheless demonstrate the necessity of the measure in question, in particular the existence of a problem linked to the public interest objective at stake and the consistency of the regulatory system.

The Commission has launched infringement cases against a significant number of Member States, and will accelerate its assessment of national provisions in the pending infringements cases and complaints and take enforcement action wherever necessary. 

(2) Enhancing administrative cooperation and efficient enforcement: enhancing administrative cooperation will assist Member States and gambling regulators in their regulatory and supervisory role and improve the quality of their work. Practical cooperation will enable Member States to become familiar with the systems of others, and to develop closer working relations at the operational level.

The Commission will:

  • facilitate administrative  cooperation between gambling regulators;
  • enhance exchange of information and best practice on enforcement measures and explore the benefits and possible limits of responsive enforcement measures, such as payment blocking and disabling access to websites, at EU level;
  • provide clarification on the procedures for notifying and acting on unauthorised content hosted in the EU by online intermediaries;
  • develop regulatory dialogue with third countries.

Member States are urged to:

  • provide gambling regulatory authorities with clear competences and ensure cooperation with other relevant competent authorities;
  • explore means to inform consumers about available authorised offers in order to direct demand to the legal market.

(3) Protecting consumers and citizens, minors and vulnerable groups: appropriate action in the EU is needed so as to: (i) draw consumers away from unregulated and potentially harmful offers; (ii) protect minors from accessing gambling facilities, recalling that the protection of minors must be a priority not least because 75% of 6-17 year olds in Europe use the internet; (iii) safeguard other vulnerable groups and (iv) prevent the development of gambling-related disorders, since it can be estimated that between 0.5-3% of the population in the EU suffer from some type of gambling disorder.

The paper notes also that responsible advertising is imperative in order to ensure that  citizens are aware that:

  • age restrictions apply;
  • gambling can be harmful if not played responsibly and
  • the risks can be financial, social or health related.

As a first step the Commission will prepare a Recommendation on common protection of consumers, which should include a set of principles including effective and efficient registration of players, age verification and identification controls – in particular in the context of money transactions, reality checks  (account activity, warning signs, signposting to helplines), no credit policy, protection of player funds, self-restriction possibilities (time/financial limits, exclusion) as well as customer support and efficient handling of complaints.

The Commission will also prepare a Recommendation on responsible gambling advertising in 2013 to ensure that operators authorised in a given Member State advertise gambling in a socially responsible manner and provide key information to consumers.

The Commission will, inter alia:

  • support benchmarking and testing of parental control tools through the Safer Internet Programme and the Connecting Europe Facility to improve age rating and content classification systems;
  • assess recommendations on gambling-related internet addiction among adolescents under EU NET ADB in 2012.

Member States are urged to:

  • strengthen information and awareness raising initiatives on the risks related to gambling, as well as on unregulated gambling offers;
  • improve cooperation between gambling regulatory authorities and consumer organisations;
  • increase the availability and use of online safety practices of children and young people to prevent them from accessing gambling sites;
  • carry out surveys and data collection on gambling disorders.

(4) Preventing fraud and money laundering: the main public interest objectives of Member States with regard to public order are the prevention of gambling fraud and money laundering. Credit card fraud and theft of banking credentials are reported to be the most common crime in relation to on-line gambling. Online gambling may also be used for laundering of funds stemming from illegal activities. These criminal offences are often committed cross-border and involve organised crime.

The Commission will:

  • consider extending the scope of the AML Directive to all forms of gambling in 2012;
  • in the context of its policy on cybercrime, encourage exchanges of experience;
  • explore the possibility of an EU standard on gambling equipment including gambling software in 2013.

(5) Safeguarding the integrity of sports and preventing match-fixing: betting related match fixing is a specific type of fraud that goes against the interests of sport organisations, sportspeople, players (consumers) and regulated gambling operators. The Commission will develop a Recommendation anti-match fixing measures with a view to:

  • promoting a more efficient exchange of good practices in the prevention of betting related match-fixing, including initiatives on awareness raising and training for actors in the field of sports;
  • ensuring mutual reporting and follow-up actions of suspicious activities by sport bodies, operators and regulators, including gathering reliable  figures on the scale of the problem;
  • establishing minimum conflict of interest provisions, e.g betting bans for sport people and sport officials as well as the exclusion of youth events from betting; and
  • introducing hotlines and other reporting or whistle-blowing alert mechanisms.

The Commission will also:

  • participate in the work of the Council of Europe on a possible Convention against manipulation of sports results;
  • promote international cooperation and dialogue in the prevention of match fixing. 

Member States are urged to:

  • set up national contact points bringing together all relevant actors involved in fighting match fixing;
  • equip national legal and administrative systems with the tools, expertise and resources to combat match fixing;
  • consider sustainable financing of sports integrity measures. 

Lastly, the Commission will publish a report within two years, assessing these actions, notably with regard to the objectives of a more effective protection of consumers and deterrence of match-fixing. It will also assess whether these actions provide an adequate EU framework for online gambling or if additional measures, where necessary legislative ones, need to be taken at EU level.

New

PURPOSE: Commission Communication on a strategy to meet the regulatory and technical challenges of the online gambling sector.

CONTENT: online gambling is a fast growing service activity in the EU, with annual growth rates of almost 15% and estimated annual revenues in 2015 in the region of EUR 13 billion, compared to EUR 9.3 billion in 2011. This would represent a total growth rate of almost 40%. It is estimated that about 6.84 million European consumers participate in online gambling.

The nature of the online environment means that gambling sites may operate in the EU, outside any form of control carried out by regulators within the EU. Consumers in Europe also search across borders for online gambling services which, if not properly regulated, may expose them to significant risks. The extensive range of offers and the rising level of demand for online gambling services pose a number of challenges when it comes to ensuring the proper implementation of public policy objectives at the national, EU and international level. 

Following the Commission Green Paper in 2011 and the European Parliament resolution on online gambling in the internal market, this Communication identifies the key challenges posed by the co-existence of national regulatory frameworks within the internal market. It also seeks to propose answers to these challenges in the form of actions to be taken both at the national and EU level.

The paper points out that while Member States are in principle free to set the objectives of their policy on games of chance and to define in detail the level of protection sought, national regulatory frameworks have to comply with EU law and internal market rules. Ensuring compliance of national law with the Treaty is therefore essential to a successful EU policy on online gambling. In view of the type of challenges posed by the development of online gambling and their implications for each Member State, it is not possible for Member States effectively to address these challenges alone and to provide individually a properly regulated and sufficiently safe offer of online gambling services.

The Communication proposes a combination of initiatives and measures covering a range of issues, seeking to enhance legal clarity and establish policies based on available evidence. These actions, fully taking into account the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, highlight five priority areas to address the challenges in the EU.

(1) Compliance of national regulatory frameworks with EU law: online gambling regulation in Member States is characterised by a diversity of regulatory frameworks. Recent regulatory changes in Member States have led to an increase in the offer of gambling services by operators authorised in an EU Member State over the last few years and to considerable differences in national regulations. Furthermore, cross-border offers are often not authorised under national rules in the recipient Member State.

Compliance of these national rules with the Treaty has been challenged in front of national 6 courts and questions on the interpretation of EU law have been referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The ECJ has confirmed that national rules that prohibit the provision of gambling services authorised in other Member States were found to restrict the freedom of national residents to receive, over the internet, services offered in other Member States. They also restrict the freedom of operators established in other Member States to provide gambling services.

The national rules in question focus mainly on consumer protection objectives, in particular the prevention of problem gambling and the protection of minors, and on crime and fraud prevention. While Member States usually offer legitimate reasons for the restriction of cross border gambling services, they must nonetheless demonstrate the necessity of the measure in question, in particular the existence of a problem linked to the public interest objective at stake and the consistency of the regulatory system.

The Commission has launched infringement cases against a significant number of Member States, and will accelerate its assessment of national provisions in the pending infringements cases and complaints and take enforcement action wherever necessary. 

(2) Enhancing administrative cooperation and efficient enforcement: enhancing administrative cooperation will assist Member States and gambling regulators in their regulatory and supervisory role and improve the quality of their work. Practical cooperation will enable Member States to become familiar with the systems of others, and to develop closer working relations at the operational level.

The Commission will:

  • facilitate administrative  cooperation between gambling regulators;
  • enhance exchange of information and best practice on enforcement measures and explore the benefits and possible limits of responsive enforcement measures, such as payment blocking and disabling access to websites, at EU level;
  • provide clarification on the procedures for notifying and acting on unauthorised content hosted in the EU by online intermediaries;
  • develop regulatory dialogue with third countries.

Member States are urged to:

  • provide gambling regulatory authorities with clear competences and ensure cooperation with other relevant competent authorities;
  • explore means to inform consumers about available authorised offers in order to direct demand to the legal market.

(3) Protecting consumers and citizens, minors and vulnerable groups: appropriate action in the EU is needed so as to: (i) draw consumers away from unregulated and potentially harmful offers; (ii) protect minors from accessing gambling facilities, recalling that the protection of minors must be a priority not least because 75% of 6-17 year olds in Europe use the internet; (iii) safeguard other vulnerable groups and (iv) prevent the development of gambling-related disorders, since it can be estimated that between 0.5-3% of the population in the EU suffer from some type of gambling disorder.

The paper notes also that responsible advertising is imperative in order to ensure that  citizens are aware that:

  • age restrictions apply;
  • gambling can be harmful if not played responsibly and
  • the risks can be financial, social or health related.

As a first step the Commission will prepare a Recommendation on common protection of consumers, which should include a set of principles including effective and efficient registration of players, age verification and identification controls – in particular in the context of money transactions, reality checks  (account activity, warning signs, signposting to helplines), no credit policy, protection of player funds, self-restriction possibilities (time/financial limits, exclusion) as well as customer support and efficient handling of complaints.

The Commission will also prepare a Recommendation on responsible gambling advertising in 2013 to ensure that operators authorised in a given Member State advertise gambling in a socially responsible manner and provide key information to consumers.

The Commission will, inter alia:

  • support benchmarking and testing of parental control tools through the Safer Internet Programme and the Connecting Europe Facility to improve age rating and content classification systems;
  • assess recommendations on gambling-related internet addiction among adolescents under EU NET ADB in 2012.

Member States are urged to:

  • strengthen information and awareness raising initiatives on the risks related to gambling, as well as on unregulated gambling offers;
  • improve cooperation between gambling regulatory authorities and consumer organisations;
  • increase the availability and use of online safety practices of children and young people to prevent them from accessing gambling sites;
  • carry out surveys and data collection on gambling disorders.

(4) Preventing fraud and money laundering: the main public interest objectives of Member States with regard to public order are the prevention of gambling fraud and money laundering. Credit card fraud and theft of banking credentials are reported to be the most common crime in relation to on-line gambling. Online gambling may also be used for laundering of funds stemming from illegal activities. These criminal offences are often committed cross-border and involve organised crime.

The Commission will:

  • consider extending the scope of the AML Directive to all forms of gambling in 2012;
  • in the context of its policy on cybercrime, encourage exchanges of experience;
  • explore the possibility of an EU standard on gambling equipment including gambling software in 2013.

(5) Safeguarding the integrity of sports and preventing match-fixing: betting related match fixing is a specific type of fraud that goes against the interests of sport organisations, sportspeople, players (consumers) and regulated gambling operators. The Commission will develop a Recommendation anti-match fixing measures with a view to:

  • promoting a more efficient exchange of good practices in the prevention of betting related match-fixing, including initiatives on awareness raising and training for actors in the field of sports;
  • ensuring mutual reporting and follow-up actions of suspicious activities by sport bodies, operators and regulators, including gathering reliable  figures on the scale of the problem;
  • establishing minimum conflict of interest provisions, e.g betting bans for sport people and sport officials as well as the exclusion of youth events from betting; and
  • introducing hotlines and other reporting or whistle-blowing alert mechanisms.

The Commission will also:

  • participate in the work of the Council of Europe on a possible Convention against manipulation of sports results;
  • promote international cooperation and dialogue in the prevention of match fixing. 

Member States are urged to:

  • set up national contact points bringing together all relevant actors involved in fighting match fixing;
  • equip national legal and administrative systems with the tools, expertise and resources to combat match fixing;
  • consider sustainable financing of sports integrity measures. 

Lastly, the Commission will publish a report within two years, assessing these actions, notably with regard to the objectives of a more effective protection of consumers and deterrence of match-fixing. It will also assess whether these actions provide an adequate EU framework for online gambling or if additional measures, where necessary legislative ones, need to be taken at EU level.

activities/1/committees/2/shadows/5/group
Old
NI
New
EFD
committees/2/shadows/5/group
Old
NI
New
EFD
activities/0/docs/0/text
  • PURPOSE: Commission Communication on a strategy to meet the regulatory and technical challenges of the online gambling sector.

    CONTENT: online gambling is a fast growing service activity in the EU, with annual growth rates of almost 15% and estimated annual revenues in 2015 in the region of EUR 13 billion, compared to EUR 9.3 billion in 2011. This would represent a total growth rate of almost 40%. It is estimated that about 6.84 million European consumers participate in online gambling.

    The nature of the online environment means that gambling sites may operate in the EU, outside any form of control carried out by regulators within the EU. Consumers in Europe also search across borders for online gambling services which, if not properly regulated, may expose them to significant risks. The extensive range of offers and the rising level of demand for online gambling services pose a number of challenges when it comes to ensuring the proper implementation of public policy objectives at the national, EU and international level. 

    Following the Commission Green Paper in 2011 and the European Parliament resolution on online gambling in the internal market, this Communication identifies the key challenges posed by the co-existence of national regulatory frameworks within the internal market. It also seeks to propose answers to these challenges in the form of actions to be taken both at the national and EU level.

    The paper points out that while Member States are in principle free to set the objectives of their policy on games of chance and to define in detail the level of protection sought, national regulatory frameworks have to comply with EU law and internal market rules. Ensuring compliance of national law with the Treaty is therefore essential to a successful EU policy on online gambling. In view of the type of challenges posed by the development of online gambling and their implications for each Member State, it is not possible for Member States effectively to address these challenges alone and to provide individually a properly regulated and sufficiently safe offer of online gambling services.

    The Communication proposes a combination of initiatives and measures covering a range of issues, seeking to enhance legal clarity and establish policies based on available evidence. These actions, fully taking into account the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, highlight five priority areas to address the challenges in the EU.

    (1) Compliance of national regulatory frameworks with EU law: online gambling regulation in Member States is characterised by a diversity of regulatory frameworks. Recent regulatory changes in Member States have led to an increase in the offer of gambling services by operators authorised in an EU Member State over the last few years and to considerable differences in national regulations. Furthermore, cross-border offers are often not authorised under national rules in the recipient Member State.

    Compliance of these national rules with the Treaty has been challenged in front of national 6 courts and questions on the interpretation of EU law have been referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). The ECJ has confirmed that national rules that prohibit the provision of gambling services authorised in other Member States were found to restrict the freedom of national residents to receive, over the internet, services offered in other Member States. They also restrict the freedom of operators established in other Member States to provide gambling services.

    The national rules in question focus mainly on consumer protection objectives, in particular the prevention of problem gambling and the protection of minors, and on crime and fraud prevention. While Member States usually offer legitimate reasons for the restriction of cross border gambling services, they must nonetheless demonstrate the necessity of the measure in question, in particular the existence of a problem linked to the public interest objective at stake and the consistency of the regulatory system.

    The Commission has launched infringement cases against a significant number of Member States, and will accelerate its assessment of national provisions in the pending infringements cases and complaints and take enforcement action wherever necessary. 

    (2) Enhancing administrative cooperation and efficient enforcement: enhancing administrative cooperation will assist Member States and gambling regulators in their regulatory and supervisory role and improve the quality of their work. Practical cooperation will enable Member States to become familiar with the systems of others, and to develop closer working relations at the operational level.

    The Commission will:

    • facilitate administrative  cooperation between gambling regulators;
    • enhance exchange of information and best practice on enforcement measures and explore the benefits and possible limits of responsive enforcement measures, such as payment blocking and disabling access to websites, at EU level;
    • provide clarification on the procedures for notifying and acting on unauthorised content hosted in the EU by online intermediaries;
    • develop regulatory dialogue with third countries.

    Member States are urged to:

    • provide gambling regulatory authorities with clear competences and ensure cooperation with other relevant competent authorities;
    • explore means to inform consumers about available authorised offers in order to direct demand to the legal market.

    (3) Protecting consumers and citizens, minors and vulnerable groups: appropriate action in the EU is needed so as to: (i) draw consumers away from unregulated and potentially harmful offers; (ii) protect minors from accessing gambling facilities, recalling that the protection of minors must be a priority not least because 75% of 6-17 year olds in Europe use the internet; (iii) safeguard other vulnerable groups and (iv) prevent the development of gambling-related disorders, since it can be estimated that between 0.5-3% of the population in the EU suffer from some type of gambling disorder.

    The paper notes also that responsible advertising is imperative in order to ensure that  citizens are aware that:

    • age restrictions apply;
    • gambling can be harmful if not played responsibly and
    • the risks can be financial, social or health related.

    As a first step the Commission will prepare a Recommendation on common protection of consumers, which should include a set of principles including effective and efficient registration of players, age verification and identification controls – in particular in the context of money transactions, reality checks  (account activity, warning signs, signposting to helplines), no credit policy, protection of player funds, self-restriction possibilities (time/financial limits, exclusion) as well as customer support and efficient handling of complaints.

    The Commission will also prepare a Recommendation on responsible gambling advertising in 2013 to ensure that operators authorised in a given Member State advertise gambling in a socially responsible manner and provide key information to consumers.

    The Commission will, inter alia:

    • support benchmarking and testing of parental control tools through the Safer Internet Programme and the Connecting Europe Facility to improve age rating and content classification systems;
    • assess recommendations on gambling-related internet addiction among adolescents under EU NET ADB in 2012.

    Member States are urged to:

    • strengthen information and awareness raising initiatives on the risks related to gambling, as well as on unregulated gambling offers;
    • improve cooperation between gambling regulatory authorities and consumer organisations;
    • increase the availability and use of online safety practices of children and young people to prevent them from accessing gambling sites;
    • carry out surveys and data collection on gambling disorders.

    (4) Preventing fraud and money laundering: the main public interest objectives of Member States with regard to public order are the prevention of gambling fraud and money laundering. Credit card fraud and theft of banking credentials are reported to be the most common crime in relation to on-line gambling. Online gambling may also be used for laundering of funds stemming from illegal activities. These criminal offences are often committed cross-border and involve organised crime.

    The Commission will:

    • consider extending the scope of the AML Directive to all forms of gambling in 2012;
    • in the context of its policy on cybercrime, encourage exchanges of experience;
    • explore the possibility of an EU standard on gambling equipment including gambling software in 2013.

    (5) Safeguarding the integrity of sports and preventing match-fixing: betting related match fixing is a specific type of fraud that goes against the interests of sport organisations, sportspeople, players (consumers) and regulated gambling operators. The Commission will develop a Recommendation anti-match fixing measures with a view to:

    • promoting a more efficient exchange of good practices in the prevention of betting related match-fixing, including initiatives on awareness raising and training for actors in the field of sports;
    • ensuring mutual reporting and follow-up actions of suspicious activities by sport bodies, operators and regulators, including gathering reliable  figures on the scale of the problem;
    • establishing minimum conflict of interest provisions, e.g betting bans for sport people and sport officials as well as the exclusion of youth events from betting; and
    • introducing hotlines and other reporting or whistle-blowing alert mechanisms.

    The Commission will also:

    • participate in the work of the Council of Europe on a possible Convention against manipulation of sports results;
    • promote international cooperation and dialogue in the prevention of match fixing. 

    Member States are urged to:

    • set up national contact points bringing together all relevant actors involved in fighting match fixing;
    • equip national legal and administrative systems with the tools, expertise and resources to combat match fixing;
    • consider sustainable financing of sports integrity measures. 

    Lastly, the Commission will publish a report within two years, assessing these actions, notably with regard to the objectives of a more effective protection of consumers and deterrence of match-fixing. It will also assess whether these actions provide an adequate EU framework for online gambling or if additional measures, where necessary legislative ones, need to be taken at EU level.

activities/2/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 2nd reading
New
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/1/committees/2/shadows/3
group
Verts/ALE
name
RÜHLE Heide
committees/2/shadows/3
group
Verts/ALE
name
RÜHLE Heide
activities/1
date
2013-01-15T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
IMCO/7/11454
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities
  • date: 2012-10-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0596/COM_COM(2012)0596_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52012DC0596:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2012)0596 body: EC type: Non-legislative basic document commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services Commissioner: BARNIER Michel
  • date: 2013-06-10T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 2nd reading
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2012-12-12T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: EPP name: BELET Ivo
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: PIETIKÄINEN Sirpa group: S&D name: SCHALDEMOSE Christel group: ALDE name: CREUTZMANN Jürgen group: GUE/NGL name: DE JONG Cornelis group: NI name: SALVINI Matteo responsible: True committee: IMCO date: 2012-10-10T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: ECR name: FOX Ashley
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy committee: ITRE
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2013-01-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: EPP name: BORYS Piotr
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs committee: LIBE
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BARNIER Michel
procedure
reference
2012/2322(INI)
title
Online gambling in the internal market
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 048
stage_reached
Preparatory phase in Parliament
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject