BETA

Activities of Marie PANAYOTOPOULOS-CASSIOTOU related to 2007/2118(INI)

Legal basis opinions (0)

Amendments (15)

Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 15
- having regard to the activities of the European Parliament’s Baltic Europe Intergroup,deleted
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 16
- having regard to the proposals of the public hearing of 29 January 2008,deleted
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 a (new)
- having regard to the position of the European Parliament adopted at second reading on 11 December 2007 with a view to the adoption of Directive 2008/.../EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for Community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive),
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution
Citation 21 b (new)
- having regard to the European Parliament’s interest in the Baltic Sea, which is evident from the activities of the Baltic Europe Intergroup and the public hearing,
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. having regard to the potential fire hazard and the risk of loss of buoyancy and the sinking of vessels resulting from a breakdown of the gas pipeline,deleted
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital V
V. whereas Article 6(3) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC requires Member States to undertake an appropriate assessment of the implications of any plan or project not directly connected with or necessary for the management of a conservation site, but likely to have a significant effect thereon, in view of the site’s conservation objectives,(Does not affect English version.)
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Expresses its resolute opposition to regarding large-scale transboundary projects planned for the Baltic Sea area, which is a common asset of the states bordering the Baltic Sea, as matters of bilateral relations between states; ·
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Calls, therefore, on the Commission and the Council to make a full commitment to analysing the environmental impact of the construction of the North European Gas Pipeline, particularly in situations involving the considerations requiring a Commission opinion, as specified in Article 6(4) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC;·lating to protected areas;
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5
5. Regrets the Commission’s failure to accept the proposal contained in Parliament’s resolution of 16 November 2006 concerning the preparation of environmental impact assessments of proposed projects by the Commission, while reiterating its call for the preparation of such an assessment
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
8. Regrets the absence of a precise definition of the extent of interference with the seabed required to bury the pipeline, which could have a critical impact on the benthic environment;·deleted
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Emphasises that alternative gas pipeline routes, which do not disturb the marine environment, should be analysed first, and notes that it is possible to run such routes to the Russian border overland, solely through European Union Member States;·deleted
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Calls on the Commission to undertake such an analysis in acoordinate the dialogue with interested states, the investor, the Helsinki Commission and with the participation of interested NGOs;·
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
16. Regrets the fact that the Green Paper ‘Towards a future Maritime Policy for the Union’ pays no attention to the problem of large-scale projects such as subsea pipelines;·deleted
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Expresses its belief that routing the North European gas pipeline through EU territory would enable it to meet the strategic and economic objectives set out in Decision 1364/2006/EC whilst avoiding extensive environmental damage;·deleted
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Calls on the Council and Commission to use every legal means at theirits disposal to prevenensure that the construction of the North European gas pipeline on the scale proposed by the investor is environmentally safe
2008/05/08
Committee: PETI