21 Amendments of Marian-Jean MARINESCU related to 2012/2017(DEC)
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. Stresses that decommissioning will be an increasingly important issue in the coming years because one third of the 1433 reactorNuclear Power Plants operating in 14 Member States will need to be shut down by 20257;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the Union committed itself to contributing financially to the decommissioning of the three nuclear power plants concernedIgnalina, Bohunice V1 and Kozloduy 1-4 reactors, without clearly defining the overall amounts to be allocated;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Takes note that the Commission delegated the management of most (83 %) of the Union financial assistance to the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), which had managed nuclear safety projects and decommissioning facilities since the early 1990s and that, to this end, three International Decommissioning Support Funds (IDSF) were set up as well as a national implementing body for Lithuania, namely the CPMA;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Is concerned that the existing decommissioning plan for Bohunice focuses only on the first phase of decommissioning, which almost exclusively covers non-radioactive material;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Demands, therefore, the immediate completion of all decommissioning activities interlinked with creating an accurate cost estimate of the decommissioning process in its entirety;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Notes that considerable sums of money had been used on operational costs; regrets a situation where the money spent on operational costs of the nuclear power plants could actually represent an incentive to keep the nuclear power plants runby the utility company operating the nuclear power plants, to the detriment of the company in charge with decommissioning;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Finds it unacceptable that, more than ten years after the start of the decommissioning funding, non some of three nuclear power plants concerned are in an irreversiblee reactors are still in operationg condition;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 39
Paragraph 39
39. Insists that the decommissioning must be organisactivity should be planned in such a way that it is irreversiblewould enable a swift release of the decommissioning license followed by the immediate defueling of the reactor concerned;
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
Paragraph 40
40. Recalls that only national authorities can obtainissue decommissioning licences;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 42
Paragraph 42
42. Asks the Commission to establishmake efforts to ensure the elaboration by the Member State of an overall financing plan identifying the funding sources and the expected benefits offor the activities still to be carried out; consequently, clear objectives should be set and performance indicators established in order to ensure a proper monitoring;
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 49
Paragraph 49
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 56
Paragraph 56
56. Believes, therefore, that amounts should be issued directly to the Member States for concrete projects alone and only if they are related exclusively to the decommissioning activity as such; urges the Commission to scrutinise the use of funds following the same verification mechanism used in shared management within cohesion policy;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 a (new)
Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Deplores the fact that, in the case of Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant, highly relevant projects such as B1 and B2/3/4 have encountered serious delays, due to technical and commercial disputes, which have generated extensive economical damage as well as discontinuity in the decommissioning process;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 b (new)
Paragraph 38 b (new)
38b. Believes the roadmap with agreed technical solutions decided upon in July 2012 by Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant and NUKEM/GNS, to be an important step forward in the process of overcoming the stalemate related to the B1 Interim spent fuel storage facility;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 c (new)
Paragraph 38 c (new)
38c. Deplores the fact that the detailed progress report on the implementation of the roadmap, expected on the 5th of October 2012, has not met the deadline;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 d (new)
Paragraph 38 d (new)
38d. Welcomes the progress achieved on some of the issues covered by the roadmap, such as validation of the casks and enhancement measures related to the cranes;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 e (new)
Paragraph 38 e (new)
38e. Remains concerned, however, that remaining outstanding issues such as the shock absorbers problematic and handling leaking and damaged fuel have not yet been agreed upon and therefore hinder a swift implementation of the above-mentioned roadmap;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 f (new)
Paragraph 38 f (new)
38f. Urges both parties involved to conclude a swift and timely agreement on all the remaining issues;
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 g (new)
Paragraph 38 g (new)
38g. Supports the findings of the Fact- Finding Mission of the Committee on Budgetary Control to Lithuania on the 10th-12th of July 2012 and in that respect, believes that Union's financial assistance should be suspended until a settlement is reached in the case of B1 and B2/3/4 Projects;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 38 h (new)
Paragraph 38 h (new)
38h. Supports the Commission's proposal on allocating additional EUR 230 million for the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant for the 2014-2017 period; reiterates that money should only be allocated if the ex- ante conditionalities as set out in the aforementioned proposal have been fulfilled and believes that the financial assistance from the Union should be concluded after that date;