BETA

24 Amendments of Marian-Jean MARINESCU related to 2015/2276(INI)

Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Highlights the dual-use capacity of Galileo and Copernicus, in the form of the Public Regulated Service and the Copernicus security service; believes this capacity should be fully developed in the next generations, noting especially the need for very high resolution earth observation data (Copernicus) and; believes this capacity should be fully developed in the next generations, for example better precision and encryption (Galileo); calls for sufficient provision in the mid-term review for all satellite systems’ future development;
2016/02/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that further implementation of the CSDP is needed; reaffirms the need to increase the effectiveness, visibility and impact of the CSDP; reaffirms the importance and the added value of the Space Policy to the CSDP; considers that Space should be included in future Union policies (e.g. internal security, transport, space, energy, research) and synergies with Space should be further strengthened and exploited;
2016/02/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. Asks the Commission to come up swiftly with a definition of EU needs regarding the potential contribution of the Space policy to the CSDP for all the main aspects: launching, positioning, imagery, communication, space weather, space debris, cyber security, jamming, spoofing and other intentional threats, security of the ground segment; considers that future space features of the current European systems should be set according to the CSDP requirements and covering all above related aspects;
2016/02/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. Calls for the definition of the necessary requirements for future systems, private or public, which participate to safety of life applications (e.g. positioning, ATM air traffic management) with regards to the protection against possible security attacks (jamming, spoofing, cyber attacks, space weather and debris); considers that such safety requirements should be certifiable and under the surveillance of an European entity (such as EASA);
2016/02/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. Recalls that Galileo is a civil system under civil control; recalls the existence of the Public Regulated Service (PRS), which is restricted to government- authorised users and is suitable for sensitive applications where robustness and complete reliability must be ensured; considers that the capacity of the PRS should be further developed in the next generations in order to respond to evolving threats; calls on the Commission to ensure that the operational procedures are as efficient as possible, particularly in the event of a crisis; stresses the need to continue developing and promoting applications based on Galileo capabilities, including the necessary ones for CSDP, in order to maximise the socio-economic benefits; recalls also the need to strengthen the security of the Galileo infrastructure, including the ground segment, and invites the Commission to take the necessary steps in this direction in cooperation with the Member States;
2016/02/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. Notes in particular the operational need for very high resolution earth observation data under the Copernicus programme and invites the Commission to assess how this need could be met; also highlights developments such as near real-time observation and video-streaming from space, and recommends the Commission to investigate how to take advantage of these, including for security and defence purposes; recalls also the need to strengthen the security of the Copernicus infrastructure, including the ground segment, and the security of the data, and invites the Commission to take the necessary steps in this direction in cooperation with the Member States;
2016/02/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
2. Welcomes the work to provide the EU with autonomy inous access to governmental satellite communications (GOVSATCOM) and invites the Commission to continue to make progress on this file; recalls that the first step in the process has been the identification of civil and military needs by the Commission and the European Defence Agency, respectively, and considers that the initiative should entail the pooling of demand and should be designed in a way that best meets the needs identified; calls on the Commission to make, on the basis of beneficiaries’ needs and requirements, a cost-benefit evaluation of different solutions: - the provision of services by commercial operators, - a system relying on current capabilities with the possibility of integrating future capabilities; or - the creation of new capacities through a dedicated system; stressnotes that, whatever the final decision should take account of the interests of beneficiaries and industry; considers that the Space Surveillance and Tracking (SST) framework could provide a governance model, any new initiative should benefit European industry (manufacturers, operators, launchers and other industry segments); considers that GOVSATCOM should also be considered as an opportunity to boost competitiveness and innovation by taking the benefit of the development of dual technologies, in the extremely competitive and dynamic context of the SATCOM market;
2016/02/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Points to the development of SST as a step towards security in space; considers that SST should become an EU programme with its own budget; invbelieves also that the EU should develop a more holistic space situational awareness (SSA) capacity, with more predictive capabilities the Commission to assess the need to take account of space weather and near-Earth objects and to come up with the next steps for SST in order to prepare industry, involving the surveillance of space and the analysis and assessment of potential threats and hazards to space activities; invites therefore the Commission to build on SST, developing a broader SSA concept that would also address intentional threats to space systems and, in cooperation with ESA, take account of space weather and near-Earth objects; believes that a holistic coordination of space activities should be reached without hampering the freedom of using space;
2016/02/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the strategic importance of independent access to space and the need for dedicated EU action; calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the European Space Agency and the Member States, to coordinate planned institutional needCalls on the Commission and the Member States, in collaboration with the European Space Agency, to coordinate and share their planned space projects, so that European industry can anticipate demand, to support launch infrastructure and to promote R&D, particularly in breakthrough launch technologies; considers that these efforts are necessary to allow Europe to compete in the global launch market;
2016/02/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Notes the strategic importance of independent access to space and the need for dedicated EU action; calls on the Commission, including with regard to security and defence, sin collaboration with the European Space Agency and the Member States, to coordinate planned institutional needs, so that industry can anticipate demand, to support launch infrastructure and to promote R&D, particularly in breakthrough technologiece this capacity allows Europe to gain access to space in the event of a crisis; considers that the EU must ensure that it has a strong space technological base and the necessary industrial capabilities to allow it to conceive, develop, launch, operate and exploit space systems, ranging from technological autonomy and cyber- security to supply-side considerations;
2016/02/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Calls for the necessary funding for space-related research to be ensured in the domains mentioned above; notes the important role that Horizon 2020 can play in helping the EU reduce its dependence in terms of critical space technologies; in that connection, recalls that the space part of Horizon 2020 falls within the ‘Industrial leadership’ priority, and in particular within the specific objective of ‘Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies’; takes the view therefore that Horizon 2020 should be used to support Europe’s space technological base and space industrial capabilities;
2016/02/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Stresses the need for better coordination of EU space capacities, with the necessary system architectures and procedures to ensure a proportionate level of security, including data security; considers thatinvites the Commission to draw up and promote a model of governance for each system providing security and defence related services; considers that, in order to provide an integrated service to end users, EU space capacities dedicated to security and defence c, should be managed by a specific operational service coordination centre. (Command and Control Centre as it is referred to in the Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2014-2015);
2016/02/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Considers that the coordination of space systems deployed in a fragmented way by the various Member States for various national needs should be enhanced in order to be able to anticipate promptly the disruption of different applications (e.g. for ATM);
2016/02/29
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Considers that space-based capabilities and services play a key role in the context of European security and defence; is convinced that current and future space- based capabilities and services will provide Member States and the Union with improved dual use operational capacity for the implementation of the common security and defence policy and of other EU policies in areas such as external action, border management, maritime security, agriculture, the environment, climate action, energy security, disaster management, humanitarian aid and transport;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Considers that further implementation of the CSDP is needed; reaffirms the need to increase the effectiveness, visibility and impact of the CSDP; reaffirms the importance and the added value of the Space Policy to the CSDP; considers that Space should be included in future Union policies (e.g. internal security, transport, space, energy, research) and synergies with Space should be further strengthened and exploited;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Believes that the Union should improve access to space-based communication, situational awareness, precision navigation and Earth observation capabilities, and ensure European non-dependence as regards critical space technologies and access to space;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Considers a holistic, integrated and long- term approach to the space sector at an EU level to be necessary; believes that the space sector should be one of the priorities for the new EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy, bearing in mind the need to further develop EU civil space programmes that can be used for both civil and military purposes;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Asks the Commission to come up swiftly with a definition of the EU needs regarding the potential contribution of the Space policy to the CSDP for all the main aspects: launching, positioning, imagery, communication, space weather, debris, cyber security, jam , ground security; considers that future space features of the current European systems should be set according to the CSDP requirements and covering all above related aspects;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 b (new)
4b. Asks for defining the necessary requirements for future systems, private or public, which participate to safety of life applications (e.g. positioning, ATM air traffic management) with regards to the protection against possible security attacks (jamming, spoofing, cyber attacks, space weather and debris); considers that such safety requirements should be certifiable and under the surveillance of an European entity (EASA could be a possibility);
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Recognises the crucial nature of the relationship between the Union and the European Space Agency; is convinced that the European SpaGNSS Agency, European Space Agency and European Defence Agency should play a significant role in the implementation of security and defence policy; invites the VP/HR to coordinate and advance the necessary initiatives and efforts to this end;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
9. Recalls the need for stronger cooperation between the EU and NATO in the area of security and defence; is convinced that EU- NATO cooperation should cover the building of resilience by the two bodies and in conjunction with ourEU neighbours, as well as defence investment; considers that cooperation on space-based capabilities and services offers prospects for improving compatibility and synergy between the two frameworks; is convinced that this would also strengthen NATO’s role in security and defence policy and in collective defence;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
13. Draws attention to the need to improve the process of disseminating information from satellites to users, including by building the necessary technological infrastructure, taking in account security aspects;
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Remains cautious about the risks associated with privatisation of the space sector;deleted
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the European Council, the Council, the Commission, the Vice- President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Secretary- General of the United Nations, the Secretary-General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organiszation, the Director-General of the European Space AgencyEU agencies in the space, security and defence fields, and the national parliaments.
2016/03/01
Committee: AFET