Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | AFET | ZDROJEWSKI Bogdan Andrzej ( PPE) | FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian ( S&D), KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław ( ECR), NICOLAI Norica ( ALDE), TARAND Indrek ( Verts/ALE) |
Committee Opinion | ITRE | MARINESCU Marian-Jean ( PPE) | David BORRELLI ( EFDD), Cora van NIEUWENHUIZEN ( ALDE), Jean-Luc SCHAFFHAUSER ( ENF) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The European Parliament adopted by 446 votes to 156, with 71 abstentions, a resolution on space capabilities for European security and defence.
Members recalled that space policy is an essential component of the strategic autonomy which the EU must develop in order to safeguard sensitive technological and industrial capabilities and independent capabilities to carry out assessments. They stressed that space capabilities for European security and defence are important and, in some cases, even vital for a multitude of situations, ranging from day-to-day peacetime use to crisis management and more acute security challenges, including full-scale warfare. The development of future capabilities needs to be programmed when current capabilities are being deployed.
Role of space-based capabilities and services : Parliament considered that space-based capabilities and services play an important role in the context of European security and defence and EU policies in areas such as external action, border management, maritime security, agriculture, the environment, climate action, energy security, disaster management, humanitarian aid and transport.
In this context, Parliament reaffirmed the importance and the added value of the Space Policy to the CSDP and that space should be included in future Union policies (e.g. internal security, transport, space, energy, research). It also stressed the importance of:
the use of space capabilities in the war against terrorism and terrorist organisations; improving access to space-based satellite communication , space situational awareness, precision navigation and Earth observation capabilities, and ensure European non-dependence as regards critical space technologies and access to space; the use of satellite capabilities to better assess and identify the flow of illegal immigrants and their routes, and, in the case of those coming from Northern Africa, to identify the ship-boarding areas in order to engage with them faster and save more lives; sufficient financial investment to guarantee the autonomy of the EU as regards space structures, while providing the resources necessary for that purpose.
Space Programmes : Parliament recalled that the two EU flagship programmes – Galileo and Copernicus – are civil programmes under civil control and that the European nature of Galileo and Copernicus has made these programmes possible and ensured their success. They wanted to ensure that European space programmes develop civilian space-based capabilities and services with relevance for European security and defence capabilities , particularly through the allocation of adequate funds for research.
Bearing in mind the dual-use capacity of EU space capabilities, Members considered that a holistic, integrated, long-term approach to the space sector at EU level is necessary, and that the space sector should be mentioned in the new EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy.
Parliament noted the importance of Galileo’s Public Regulated Service (PRS) for navigation and guidance of military systems; calls on the High Representative and the EU Member States to increase their efforts regarding a possible revision of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty or to initiate a new regulatory framework that takes account of technological progress since the 1960s and aims to prevent an arms race in space . Members encouraged the identification and development of security- and defence-related capacity needs for the next generations of the Galileo and Copernicus systems.
The EU’s needs and strategic objectives : Parliament asked the Commission to come up swiftly with a definition of EU needs regarding the potential contribution of the space policy to the CSDP for all the main aspects: launching, positioning, imagery, communication, space weather, space debris, cyber security, jamming, spoofing and other intentional threats, security of the ground segment.
The development of European space capabilities for European security and defence should follow two key strategic objectives :
security on the planet through in-orbit space systems designed to monitor the earth’s surface or to provide positioning, navigation and timing information or satellite communications and security in outer space as well as space safety , i.e. security in orbit and in space through ground-based and in-orbit space situational awareness systems.
Operational coordination : the resolution stressed that cooperation between the Commission, the European External Action Service, the GNSS Agency, the European Defence Agency, the European Space Agency and the Member States is crucial to improving European space capabilities and services. The Union should coordinate and support such cooperation through a specific operational coordination centre .
Parliament also suggested, inter alia:
stimulating space innovation and research for security and defence and innovative big data technologies to make use of the full potential of space data for security and defence; the development of the EU's various diplomatic initiatives in space issues, in both a bilateral and a multilateral context, in order to contribute to the development of the institutionalisation of space; setting up a permanent programme and to use the European added value of the EDA for military satellite communication as well; identifying any potential technological gap to facilitate EU-US cooperation on future space-based capabilities; strengthen EU-NATO cooperation in the area of security and defence policy and in collective defence; continuing to facilitate the establishment of an international code of conduct on outer space activities, in order to protect space infrastructure while preventing a weaponisation of space; ensuring that space situational awareness / space weather, satellite communication, electronic intelligence and early warning could benefit from greater cooperation between the public and private sectors, and additional EU-level support; assessing how to meet the operational need for very high resolution earth observation data under the Copernicus programme; the further development of the EU’s own Space Surveillance and Tracking (SST) capacities; developing policies and research capabilities in order to provide future applications and develop a competitive European industry, capable of commercial success based on a healthy economic environment; establishing the correct regulatory and policy frameworks in order to give industry further impetus and incentives to pursue technological development and research into space capabilities.
Parliament welcomed the process and plans for the development of new European launchers Ariane 6 and VEGA, and considered the development of these launchers to be crucial to the long-term viability and independence of the European space programmes. It noted the strategic importance of independent access to space and the need for dedicated EU action, including with regard to security and defence.
Lastly, Parliament considered that creating in the long term a legal framework permitting sustained EU-level investments in security and defence capabilities could foster greater and more systematic European defence cooperation with a view to delivering key capabilities.
The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI (EPPE, PL) on space capabilities for European security and defence.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy exercising its prerogatives as an associated committee in accordance with Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure , also gave its opinion on the report.
Members recalled that space policy is an essential component of the strategic autonomy which the EU must develop in order to safeguard sensitive technological and industrial capabilities and independent capabilities to carry out assessments.
Role of space-based capabilities and services : Members considered that space-based capabilities and services play an important role in the context of European security and defence and EU policies in areas such as external action, border management, maritime security, agriculture, the environment, climate action, energy security, disaster management, humanitarian aid and transport.
In this context, the report reaffirmed the importance and the added value of the Space Policy to the CSDP and that space should be included in future Union policies (e.g. internal security, transport, space, energy, research). It stressed the importance of:
the use of space capabilities in the war against terrorism and terrorist organisations, through the ability to locate and monitor their training camps; improving access to space-based satellite communication , space situational awareness, precision navigation and Earth observation capabilities, and ensure European non-dependence as regards critical space technologies and access to space; sufficient financial investment to guarantee the autonomy of the EU as regards space structures, while providing the resources necessary for that purpose.
Space Programmes : Members recalled that the two EU flagship programmes – Galileo and Copernicus – are civil programmes under civil control and that the European nature of Galileo and Copernicus has made these programmes possible and ensured their success. They wanted to ensure that European space programmes develop civilian space-based capabilities and services with relevance for European security and defence capabilities, particularly through the allocation of adequate funds for research.
Bearing in mind the dual-use capacity of EU space capabilities, Members considered that a holistic, integrated, long-term approach to the space sector at EU level is necessary, and that the space sector should be mentioned in the new EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy.
The EU’s needs and strategic objectives : Members asked the Commission to come up swiftly with a definition of EU needs regarding the potential contribution of the space policy to the CSDP for all the main aspects: launching, positioning, imagery, communication, space weather, space debris, cyber security, jamming, spoofing and other intentional threats, security of the ground segment.
The development of European space capabilities for European security and defence should follow two key strategic objectives:
security on the planet through in-orbit space systems designed to monitor the earth’s surface or to provide positioning, navigation and timing information or satellite communications and security in outer space as well as space safety , i.e. security in orbit and in space through ground-based and in-orbit space situational awareness systems.
Operational coordination : the report stressed that cooperation between the Commission, the European External Action Service, the GNSS Agency, the European Defence Agency, the European Space Agency and the Member States is crucial to improving European space capabilities and services. The Union should coordinate and support such cooperation through a specific operational coordination centre .
The report also suggested, inter alia:
stimulating space innovation and research for security and defence and innovative big data technologies to make use of the full potential of space data for security and defence; the development of the EU's various diplomatic initiatives in space issues, in both a bilateral and a multilateral context, in order to contribute to the development of the institutionalisation of space; setting up a permanent programme and to use the European added value of the EDA for military satellite communication as well; identifying any potential technological gap to facilitate EU-US cooperation on future space-based capabilities; continuing to facilitate the establishment of an international code of conduct on outer space activities, in order to protect space infrastructure while preventing a weaponisation of space; ensuring that space situational awareness / space weather, satellite communication, electronic intelligence and early warning could benefit from greater cooperation between the public and private sectors, and additional EU-level support; assessing how to meet the operational need for very high resolution earth observation data under the Copernicus programme; the further development of the EU’s own Space Surveillance and Tracking (SST) capacities; developing policies and research capabilities in order to provide future applications and develop a competitive European industry, capable of commercial success based on a healthy economic environment; establishing the correct regulatory and policy frameworks in order to give industry further impetus and incentives to pursue technological development and research into space capabilities.
Members welcomed the process and plans for the development of new European launchers Ariane 6 and VEGA, and considered the development of these launchers to be crucial to the long-term viability and independence of the European space programmes. They noted the strategic importance of independent access to space and the need for dedicated EU action, including with regard to security and defence.
Lastly, Members considered that creating in the long term a legal framework permitting sustained EU-level investments in security and defence capabilities could foster greater and more systematic European defence cooperation with a view to delivering key capabilities.
Documents
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2016)612
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T8-0267/2016
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A8-0151/2016
- Committee opinion: PE575.369
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE577.056
- Committee draft report: PE572.951
- Committee draft report: PE572.951
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE577.056
- Committee opinion: PE575.369
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2016)612
Activities
- Xabier BENITO ZILUAGA
- Doru-Claudian FRUNZULICĂ
- Notis MARIAS
- Franck PROUST
- Flavio ZANONATO
- Louis ALIOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marina ALBIOL GUZMÁN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean ARTHUIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine ARNAUTU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jonathan ARNOTT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zoltán BALCZÓ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hugues BAYET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joëlle BERGERON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- José BLANCO LÓPEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine BOUTONNET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Renata BRIANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Steeve BRIOIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alain CADEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Nicola CAPUTO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lorenzo CESA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Alberto CIRIO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Therese COMODINI CACHIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andi CRISTEA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Javier COUSO PERMUY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edward CZESAK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Rachida DATI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mireille D'ORNANO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bill ETHERIDGE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Georgios EPITIDEIOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Edouard FERRAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lorenzo FONTANA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Francisco de Paula GAMBUS MILLET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Elena GENTILE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Arne GERICKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- María Teresa GIMÉNEZ BARBAT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michela GIUFFRIDA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tania GONZÁLEZ PEÑAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Françoise GROSSETÊTE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Antanas GUOGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Takis HADJIGEORGIOU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Brian HAYES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Hans-Olaf HENKEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cătălin Sorin IVAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivan JAKOVČIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Philippe JUVIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara KAPPEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd KÖLMEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz KORWIN-MIKKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Giovanni LA VIA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marine LE PEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sabine LÖSING
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernd LUCKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Olle LUDVIGSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Paloma LÓPEZ BERMEJO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Svetoslav Hristov MALINOV
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Monica MACOVEI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Ivana MALETIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrejs MAMIKINS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jiří MAŠTÁLKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dominique MARTIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Valentinas MAZURONIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc MÉLENCHON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Louis MICHEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Bernard MONOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marlene MIZZI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sophie MONTEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Cora van NIEUWENHUIZEN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jens NILSSON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Franz OBERMAYR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Florian PHILIPPOT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marijana PETIR
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Andrej PLENKOVIĆ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Laurenţiu REBEGA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Michel REIMON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sofia RIBEIRO
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Robert ROCHEFORT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Liliana RODRIGUES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claude ROLIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Fernando RUAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tokia SAÏFI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lola SÁNCHEZ CALDENTEY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Jean-Luc SCHAFFHAUSER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Maria Lidia SENRA RODRÍGUEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Siôn SIMON
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Branislav ŠKRIPEK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Davor ŠKRLEC
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Igor ŠOLTES
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Joachim STARBATTY
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Catherine STIHLER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Beatrix von STORCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Patricija ŠULIN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Neoklis SYLIKIOTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Eleftherios SYNADINOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Adam SZEJNFELD
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Tibor SZANYI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Dubravka ŠUICA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Indrek TARAND
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Claudia ȚAPARDEL
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Pavel TELIČKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Mylène TROSZCZYNSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Kazimierz Michał UJAZDOWSKI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marita ULVSKOG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Marie-Christine VERGIAT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Miguel VIEGAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Lieve WIERINCK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Sotirios ZARIANOPOULOS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Janusz ZEMKE
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski - § 2/1 #
A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski - § 2/2 #
A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski - § 2/3 #
A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski - § 7/1 #
A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski - § 7/2 #
A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski - § 7/3 #
A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski - § 9 #
A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski - § 21/2 #
A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski - § 24 #
A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski - § 29/2 #
A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski - § 50/2 #
A8-0151/2016 - Bogdan Andrzej Zdrojewski - Résolution #
Amendments | Dossier |
262 |
2015/2276(INI)
2016/02/29
ITRE
62 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Reaffirms the civilian nature of the EU’s space policy, and the primacy of EU space programmes as missions to promote scientific progress and industrial competitiveness in accordance with Article 189 of the Treaty of Lisbon;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that further implementation of the CSDP is needed; reaffirms the need to increase the effectiveness, visibility and impact of the CSDP; reaffirms the importance and the added value of the Space Policy to the CSDP; considers that Space should be included in future Union policies (e.g. internal security, transport, space, energy, research) and synergies with Space should be further strengthened and exploited;
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Insists that the provision of Galileo services must be consistent with the principle that Galileo is a civil system under civil control, and that all uses thereof must comply with international law, the UN Charter and the Lisbon Treaty;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Points out that in order to further develop the capacities of satellite-based systems a comprehensive concept of security is needed; emphasises therefore that the usefulness of high-resolution earth observation data and positioning systems lies above all in the areas of disaster management, humanitarian actions, refugee aid, maritime surveillance, global warming, energy security and global food security, as well as in the detection of and response to global natural disasters, notably droughts, earthquakes, floods and forest fires; adds that a comprehensive concept of security also includes threats posed by near-Earth objects, space weather and space debris; calls therefore for the technical and infrastructure development of the systems to meet the requirements for a comprehensive concept of security;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Asks the Commission to come up swiftly with a definition of EU needs regarding the potential contribution of the Space policy to the CSDP for all the main aspects: launching, positioning, imagery, communication, space weather, space debris, cyber security, jamming, spoofing and other intentional threats, security of the ground segment; considers that future space features of the current European systems should be set according to the CSDP requirements and covering all above related aspects;
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 c (new) 1c. Calls for the definition of the necessary requirements for future systems, private or public, which participate to safety of life applications (e.g. positioning, ATM air traffic management) with regards to the protection against possible security attacks (jamming, spoofing, cyber attacks, space weather and debris); considers that such safety requirements should be certifiable and under the surveillance of an European entity (such as EASA);
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 d (new) 1d. Recalls that Galileo is a civil system under civil control; recalls the existence of the Public Regulated Service (PRS), which is restricted to government- authorised users and is suitable for sensitive applications where robustness and complete reliability must be ensured; considers that the capacity of the PRS should be further developed in the next generations in order to respond to evolving threats; calls on the Commission to ensure that the operational procedures are as efficient as possible, particularly in the event of a crisis; stresses the need to continue developing and promoting applications based on Galileo capabilities, including the necessary ones for CSDP, in order to maximise the socio-economic benefits; recalls also the need to strengthen the security of the Galileo infrastructure, including the ground segment, and invites the Commission to take the necessary steps in this direction in cooperation with the Member States;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 e (new) 1e. Notes in particular the operational need for very high resolution earth observation data under the Copernicus programme and invites the Commission to assess how this need could be met; also highlights developments such as near real-time observation and video-streaming from space, and recommends the Commission to investigate how to take advantage of these, including for security and defence purposes; recalls also the need to strengthen the security of the Copernicus infrastructure, including the ground segment, and the security of the data, and invites the Commission to take the necessary steps in this direction in cooperation with the Member States;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the work to provide the EU with autonom
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the dual-use capacity of Galileo and Copernicus, in the form of the Public Regulated Service and the Copernicus security service; stresses that these projects should pay special attention to civil applications, as it befits their overall design; believes this capacity should be fully developed in the next generations, noting especially the need for very high resolution earth observation data (Copernicus) and better precision and encryption (Galileo); calls for sufficient provision in the mid-term review for all satellite systems’ future development;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the work to provide the EU with autonomy in governmental satellite communications (GOVSATCOM); calls on the Commission to make, on the basis of beneficiaries’ needs and requirements, a cost-benefit evaluation of different solutions: a system relying on current
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Welcomes the work to provide the EU with autonomy in governmental satellite communications (GOVSATCOM); calls on the Commission to make, on the basis of beneficiaries’ needs and requirements, a cost-benefit evaluation of different solutions: a system relying on current capabilities with the possibility of integrating future capabilities or the creation of new capacities through a dedicated system; invites in this regard the Commission to address the issue of ownership and liability; stresses that the final decision should take account of the interests of beneficiaries and industry; considers that the Space Surveillance and Tracking (SST) framework could provide a governance model;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the development of SST as a step towards security in space; considers that SST should become an EU programme with its own budget;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the development of SST as a
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the development of SST as a step towards security in space and to the further development of its own SST capacities as a priority of the Union in the area of space capabilities for European security and defence; considers therefore that SST should become an EU programme with its own budget; stresses in this regard the potential danger of space debris; invites the Commission to assess the need to take account of space weather, space debris and near-Earth objects and to come up with the next steps for SST in order to prepare industry;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the development of SST as a step towards security in space; considers that SST should become an EU programme with its own budget; invites the Commission to assess the need to take account of space weather and near-Earth objects and to come up with the next steps for SST in order to prepare industry; calls, however, for this to be done without recourse to cuts in funding for current projects;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the development of SST as a step towards security in space; c
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the development of SST as a step towards security in space; considers that SST
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the development of SST as a step towards security in space; considers that SST should become an EU programme with its own limited budget; invites the Commission to assess the need to take account of space weather and near-Earth objects and to come up with the next steps for SST in order to prepare industry; emphasises that the private sector should be enabled to play an important role in further developing and maintaining the non-sensitive part of the SST system, for which the two-sided governance structure of Galileo could serve as an example;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the dual-use capacity of Galileo and Copernicus
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points to the development of SST as a step towards security in space; considers that SST
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Points out that the prevention and the elimination of future and existing space debris must be part of a strategic reflection on how to ensure security in Europe; draws attention to the need for research into technological systems for the prevention and elimination of space debris; calls in this respect for close cooperation between the European Union and the Member States and the European Space Agency, as well as other stakeholders and countries in the field of space policy;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Concerned by the high costs incurred by Galileo and Copernicus, underlines the need to develop policies and research capabilities in order to provide future applications and develop a competitive European industry, capable of commercial success based on a healthy economic environment and not depending on Union or Member State budgets;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the strategic importance of independent access to space and the need for dedicated EU action; calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the European Space Agency and the Member States, to coordinate
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the strategic importance of independent access to space
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 37 #
4.
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the strategic importance of independent access to space and the need for dedicated EU action; calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the European Space Agency and the Member States, to coordinate planned institutional needs, so that industry can anticipate demand, to support launch infrastructure and to promote R&D
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the strategic importance of independent access to space and the need for dedicated EU action; calls on the Commission, in collaboration with the European Space Agency and the Member States, to coordinate planned institutional needs, so that industry can anticipate demand, as well as on the other hand generate its own demand as concerns business driven utilization, to support launch infrastructure and to promote R&D, particularly in breakthrough technologies;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the dual-use capacity of Galileo and Copernicus, in the form of the Public Regulated Service and the Copernicus security service; believes this capacity should be fully developed in the next generations, noting especially the need for very high resolution earth observation data (Copernicus) and better precision and encryption (Galileo); calls for sufficient provision in the mid-term review for all satellite systems’ future development; points in addition to the importance of considering how industry might be involved in the management of Copernicus operations;
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the strategic importance of independent access to space and the need for dedicated EU action; calls on the
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes the strategic importance of independent access to space and the need for dedicated EU action
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Points out that the correct regulatory and policy frameworks must be established in order to give industry further impetus and incentives to pursue technological development and research into space capabilities; underlines in this regard that the Union, in cooperation with the European Space Agency and Member States, should take over the operational coordination of the future space capabilities of the Union.
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for the necessary funding for space-related research to be ensured in the domains mentioned above; notes the important role that Horizon 2020 can play in helping the EU reduce its dependence in terms of critical space technologies; in that connection, recalls that the space part of Horizon 2020 falls within the ‘Industrial leadership’ priority, and in particular within the specific objective of ‘Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies’; takes the view therefore that Horizon 2020 should be used to support Europe’s space technological base and space industrial capabilities;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Recognises simultaneously benefits of security-related international cooperation in area of space with EU’s reliable partners, particularly with the United States and Japan;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the strategic importance of stimulating space innovation and research for security and defence; acknowledges the large potential of critical space technologies such as the European Data Relay System, which enables real-time and persistent earth observation, the deployment of mega- constellations of nanosats and, lastly, building up a responsive space capacity; underlines the need for innovative big data technologies to make use of the full potential of space data for security and defence; invites the Commission to incorporate these technologies in its Space Strategy for Europe;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls on the Commission to provide sufficiently for critical space technologies for security and defence during the mid- term review of Horizon 2020;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. Identifies the dangers of cyber warfare for European space programmes, taking into account that spoofing or jamming can disturb military missions or have far- reaching implications for daily life on earth; believes that cyber security requires a joint approach by EU, Member States, business and internet specialists; calls on the Commission, therefore, to include space communication in its cyber security programmes;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses the need for better coordination of EU space capacities,
Amendment 49 #
5. Stresses the need for better coordination of
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the dual-use capacity of Galileo and Copernicus, in the form of the Public Regulated Service and the Copernicus security service; underlines that space programmes have both civil and military benefits, which are technologically linked; believes this capacity should be fully developed in the next generations, noting especially the need for very high resolution earth observation data (Copernicus) and better precision and encryption (Galileo); calls for sufficient provision in the mid-term review for all satellite systems’ future development;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses the need for better coordination of EU space capacities, with the necessary system architectures and procedures to ensure a proportionate level of security, including data security;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses the need for better coordination of EU space capacities, with the necessary
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses the need for better coordination of EU space capacities, with the necessary system architectures and procedures
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses the need for better coordination of EU space capacities, with the necessary system architectures and procedures to ensure a proportionate level of security, including data security, as well as the use and exploration of space for peaceful purposes; considers that EU space capacities dedicated to security and defence could be managed by a specific operational service coordination centre.
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses the need for better coordination of EU space capacities, with the necessary system architectures and procedures to ensure a proportionate level of security, including data security; considers that EU space capacities dedicated to security and defence could be managed by a specific operational service coordination centre
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Stresses the need for better coordination of EU space capacities, with the necessary system architectures and procedures to ensure a proportionate level of data security
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the Commission to assess whether European programs are reliable in crisis situations and appropriate governance structures are in place in order to manage them in such an event; expresses concerns over: data and communication security; difficulties in gaining access to data; and integration of space data in crisis relief operations;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that the coordination of space systems deployed in a fragmented way by the various Member States for various national needs should be enhanced in order to be able to anticipate promptly the disruption of different applications (e.g. for ATM);
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Points out, as regards the future financing of European space programmes, that it would be desirable to determine when it might be possible to use forms of public-private partnership.
Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Highlights the need to strengthen cyber security and the protection against hybrid threats;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the dual-use capacity of Galileo and Copernicus, in the form of the Public Regulated Service and the Copernicus
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Underlines the high level of security for the EU GNSS systems; underlines the successful execution of tasks assigned to the European GNSS Agency, in particular through the Security Accreditation Board and the Galileo Security Monitoring Centres; calls in this respect for use to be made of the expertise and security infrastructure of the European GNSS Agency also for Copernicus; calls for this issue to be addressed in the mid-term review of Galileo and Copernicus;
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls for a new inter-institutional mechanism for scrutiny and oversight of the EU space programmes in order to facilitate the effective implementation of the goals of an EU space policy under Article 189 of the Treaty of Lisbon, and to enable the co-legislators to work more efficiently with the Commission to monitor implementation of large scale scientific programmes;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Expresses concerns about the reliance of the European space programs on non- European data and data related services and the vulnerability of the PRS and key space infrastructure to interference from other countries with space capacities, whether or not they are EU allies.
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the dual-use capacity of Galileo and Copernicus, in the form of the Public Regulated Service and the Copernicus security service; believes this capacity should be fully developed in the next generations, noting especially the need for very high resolution earth observation data (Copernicus) and better precision, a
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Highlights the
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Underlines in this regard that the development of European space capabilities for European security and defence should have two key strategic objectives: security on the planet, i.e. security on the planet through technological space systems in orbit designed to monitor the earth's surface, and security in outer space as well as space safety, i.e. security in orbit and in space through SST systems on the earth's surface and in orbit designed to monitor the orbit and outer space;
source: 578.535
2016/03/01
AFET
200 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 1 – having regard to Title V of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and in particular Article 24(1) and Article 42(1) thereof,
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the increasingly dangerous and challenging security environment within and outside the Union, characterised by terrorist attacks and mass murder, to which
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Recognises the crucial nature of the relationship between the Union and the European Space Agency; is convinced that the European Space Agency should play a significant role in the definition and implementation of
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Calls to develop the EU's various diplomatic initiatives in space issues, both in bilateral and multilateral context contributing to development of institutionalization of space and increase in transparency and confidence-building measures; stresses the need to intensify works on the promotion of an International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities; encourages the EEAS of considering the space component in negotiations in other issues-areas;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Encourages the Member States to carry out joint programmes and initiatives in the area of defence and security,
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Encourages the Member States to
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Encourages the Member States to
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the ongoing project of EDA and ESA on Governmental Satellite Communications (GovSatcom) being one of the EDA's flagship programmes identified by the European Council in December 2013; calls in this regard on the involved actors to set up a permanent programme and to use the European added value of the EDA for military satellite communication as well; welcomes the successful completion of the DESIRE I project and the launch of the DESIRE II demonstration project for the future operation of RPAS in non-segregated airspace by EDA and ESA;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is convinced that the EU-US relationship in the field of security and defence policy should be further developed; considers that EU-US cooperation on future space-based capabilities and services for security and defence purposes would be mutually beneficial; notes the work undertaken towards the third US Offset Strategy;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the increasingly dangerous and challenging security environment within and outside the Union
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is convinced that the EU-US relationship in the field of security and defence policy
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is convinced that the EU-
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Is convinced that the EU-US relationship
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Believes that the EU should continue to facilitate the establishment of an international code of conduct on outer space activities to protect space infrastructure while preventing a weaponisation of space; considers that the development of the SSA programme is vital to this; calls for the Union to work towards this objective in cooperation with the UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space and other relevant partners;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recalls the need for
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recalls the ne
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the increasingly dangerous and challenging security environment within and outside the Union, characterised by terrorist attacks and mass murder which
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recalls the need for stronger cooperation between the EU and NATO in the area of security and defence; is convinced that EU- NATO cooperation should cover the building of resilience by the two bodies and in conjunction with
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Recalls the need for stronger
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Points out, however, that the EU must continue to try to best ensure space- related and military autonomy; points out that the EU must have its own machinery establishing a Defence Union;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers that the protection of space- based capabilities and services for security and defence against cyber-attacks and other harmful interference could offer
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers that the protection of space- based capabilities and services for security and defence against cyber-attacks and other harmful interference offers prospects for strengthened EU-NATO cooperation;
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers that the protection of space- based capabilities and services
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the increasingly dangerous and challenging security environment within and outside the Union, characterised by terrorist attacks and mass murder which no Member State can cope with alone, calls for the strengthening of the EU’s security
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers that the protection of space- based capabilities and services for security and defence against cyber-attacks
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers that the protection of space- based capabilities and services for security and defence against cyber-attacks and other harmful interference
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10.
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers that the protection of space- based capabilities and services for security and defence against cyber-attacks
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Considers that the protection of space- based capabilities and services for security
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Also considers it essential to pursue cooperation in this field with like-minded external allies of the EU and NATO, for example Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Draws attention to the danger posed by such capabilities, or the date made available by them, to be controlled and misused by any hacker or organisation, thus reminds about the need for a clear separation between public and non-public access to these capabilities;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Points out that the United States, Russia, and China are intensifying programmes aimed at exploiting lunar resources; urges the Commission to work in coordination with the Member States and the European Space Agency with a view to safeguarding EU and Member State interests where the moon is concerned;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Considers that the civilian EU programmes in the space domain that can provide capabilities and services relevant to the Union’s security and defence policy, including the next stages of evolution of the Copernicus and Galileo systems, need to
Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the increasingly dangerous and challenging security environment within and outside the Union, characterised by t
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Considers that the EU programmes in the space domain that provide capabilities and services relevant to the Union’s security and defence policy, including the next stages of evolution of the Copernicus and Galileo systems, need to take security- and defence-related requirements into account from their inception; considers that space situational awareness, satellite communication, electronic intelligence and
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Considers that the EU programmes in the space domain that provide capabilities and services relevant to the Union
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 11. Considers that the civilian EU programmes in the space domain
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Notes the importance of Galileo's Public Regulated Service (PRS) for navigation and guidance of military systems; calls on the HR and the EU Member States to increase their efforts regarding the possible revision of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty or to initiate a new regulatory framework which takes into account technological progress since the 1960s and aiming at preventing and arms race in space;
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that effective promotion among Europeans of the applications of EU space
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that effective promotion among Europeans of the applications of EU space programmes that have a direct impact on users, such as Galileo services, is crucial for the success of those programmes; regrets, however, the delay to the Galileo project and the poorly anticipated costs;
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Notes that
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Draws attention to the need to improve the process of disseminating information from satellites to users, including by building the necessary technological infrastructure, taking in account security aspects;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Draws attention to the need to improve the process of disseminating information from satellites to users, including by building the necessary technological infrastructure; notes the fact mentioned in the Commission communication that 60% of electronics on board European satellites are currently imported from the US; calls for an initiative on how to protect sensitive or personal data in this context;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the increasingly dangerous and challenging security environment within and outside the Union, characterised by terrorist attacks and mass murder which require close cooperation between
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Remains cautious about the major risks associated with privatisation of the space sector
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Remains cautious about the risks associated with privatisation of the space sector; stresses that the balance between risks and benefits may vary from segment to segment of space activities, therefore needs to be assessed on a case to case basis;
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 155 #
14.
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Remains cautious about the risks associated with privatisation of the space sector; stresses that the balance between risks and benefits may vary from segment to segment of space activities, therefore needs to be assessed on a case to case basis;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14.
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14a. Emphasises that where space is concerned, and given its strategic importance, the onus with regard to investment efforts must be on the public sector; takes the view that the high costs of developing space programmes and infrastructure mean that the only way of ensuring the viability of such projects is through decisive public sector efforts to channel private initiatives;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Union needs to contribute to the fight against terrorism at home and abroad,
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the EU should lead initiatives that make European space capabilities and services more robust, resilient and responsive; is convinced that a rapid reaction capability to replace or restore damaged or degraded assets in space as a crisis unfolds can only be developed effectively at the European level; questions whether appropriate governance structures are in place in order to manage PRS and other key space infrastructure in case of an armed aggression or other major security crisis;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the EU should lead and implement initiatives that make European space capabilities and services more robust, resilient and responsive; is convinced that a rapid reaction capability to replace or restore damaged or degraded assets in space as a crisis unfolds
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 15. Believes that the EU
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Underlines also the urgent need to reduce the risk of collision due to the growing number of satellites and space debris; welcomes the initiative of the Commission on a European space surveillance and tracking system (SST);
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new) 15a. Commends ESA's work on developing a Space Situational Awareness (SSA) programme to detect and predict space debris or satellite collision; calls for the Commission and the Council to continue the funding of this project after 2016 in order to secure EU non- independence to space;
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16. Encourages the Commission and the European agencies in the space, security, and defence fields to join forces to develop a
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 16.
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Believes that further financial and political support for the development and use of the EU launchers and of the Programme for Reusable In-orbit Demonstrator in Europe (PRIDE) is of strategic importance as it is more cost- efficient and it provides independence in space access, as well as a plan for space crisis management;
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Union needs to contribute to the fight against terrorism both at home and abroad
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Expresses its concerns about the increased cost of the Copernicus and Galileo programmes far beyond the initial budgetary allocations; express its support for the further development of the EU space capabilities while asking for an adequate management of the financial resources;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 a (new) 16a. Calls on those Member States who have not ratified the Outer Space Treaty to do so, given its importance in the maintenance of law in space;
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the process and plans for the development of new European launcher Ariane 6 and VEGA, and considers the development of th
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the process and plans for the development of new European launcher Ariane 6, and considers the development of this launcher to be crucial for the long-term viability and independence of the European space programmes that serve defence and security purposes; encourages cooperation with the United States and Ukraine as a temporary solution before the European launcher program will be developed;
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the process and plans for the development of new European launchers Ariane
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the process and plans for the development of new European launcher Ariane 6, and considers the development of this launcher to be crucial for the long-term viability and independence of the European space programmes that serve defence and security purposes; is firmly of the opinion that maintaining the predominant position of European launchers must be a strategic European objective at a time when new competitors are emerging that are backed up strongly by competitive funding models; takes the view that in order to achieve that objective, appropriate structural, legislative and funding changes need to be made to foster the development of innovative, competitive projects at European level; advocates, among other issues, innovation in the reuse of components, as this represents a significant step forwards in terms of both efficiency and sustainability;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 17. Welcomes the process and plans for the development of new E
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Considers that the Union should encourage all actors in the technology and know-how supply chains to turn their attention to space-based capabilities and services
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Considers that the Union should encourage all actors in the technology and know-how supply chains to turn their attention to space-based capabilities and
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Considers that the Union should encourage all actors in the technology and know-how supply chains to turn their attention to space-based capabilities and services for security and defence, and should promote the development of innovative applications and new business ideas in this area, with a particular focus on small and medium-sized companies and on developing entrepreneurship in this sector; notes that continued financial investment is needed to sustain technological research and development; calls for a plan for the use of dual-use space technologies in the space sector, aimed at contributing to the development of the European military and defence industry and to greater competition;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Union needs to
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Considers that the Union should encourage all actors in the technology and know-how supply chains to turn their attention to space
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Considers that the Union should encourage all actors in the technology and know-how supply chains to turn their attention to space-based capabilities and services for security and defence, and should promote the development of innovative applications and new business ideas in this area, with a particular focus on small and medium-sized companies and on developing entrepreneurship in this sector; firmly believes that the public sector must provide incentives for the creation of specialist incubators and funds designed to provide financing for innovative start- ups so as to ensure that the high costs of space research do not hinder the emergence of innovative projects; calls for a plan for the use of dual-use space technologies in the space sector,
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 18. Considers that the Union should encourage all actors in the technology and know-how supply chains to turn their attention to space-based capabilities and services for security and defence, and should promote the development of innovative applications and new business ideas in this area, with a particular focus on small and medium-sized companies and on developing entrepreneurship in this sector; calls for a plan for the use of dual-use space technologies in the space sector
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18a. Stresses the need to support efforts to strengthen European cooperation in the sector in order to overcome the high level of fragmentation, especially with regard to the institutional demand side; is convinced that only a more cost-efficient, transparent and consolidated European space industry can be internationally competitive; stresses that European space industrial policy must be further developed in coordination with the European Space Agency (ESA) to ensure complementarities;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new) 18b. Recalls that in order to maintain and strengthen the security, defence and stability of Europe it is important to prevent the export of sensitive space technology to countries which endanger regional or global security and stability, which pursue an aggressive foreign policy, which directly or indirectly support terrorism and which repress their people internally; urges the HR, the EU Member States and the Commission to make sure that the eight criteria of Common Position 944 and the rules of the Dual-Use- Regulation are being fully respected regarding the export of sensitive space related technology;
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Is convinced that
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Is convinced that sustained EU-level investments in security and defence capabilities foster greater and more systematic European defence cooperation with a view to delivering key capabilities; welcomes, therefore, the European Council conclusions of June 2015; urges the Council, the VP/HR and the Commission to develop the necessary framework for EU-level funding;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19.
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19.
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the EU needs to increase its role as a security provider at home and abroad, ensuring stability in its neighbourhood and globally; whereas the Union needs to contribute to the fight against terrorism at home and abroad, including by supporting third countries in combating terrorism; whereas the Union needs to make its external borders more secure;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Notes that the European space industry is deeply concentrated with a high degree of vertical integration where four enterprises are responsible for more than 70% of the total European space employment and 90% of European space sector manufacturing employment is located in six countries; stresses that the potential of countries with good track record in high-technology patent filings but lacking tradition of space activities should not be overlooked and calls for policies to encourage participation of these countries into European space sector including using the tools of 'Horizon 2020' programme;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new) 19a. Believes also that research and development within the field of space technology and services should be strengthened within a consistent EU policy framework;
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Takes the view that an EU-level ‘white book’ on security and defence
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Takes the view that an EU-level ‘white book’ on security and defence would be the appropriate means of structuring future EU engagement and investment in space-based security and defence capabilities; calls on the HR/VP to start a debate on defining EU's level of ambition in the overlapping fields of space capabilities as well as security and defence; takes the view that this would also allow coherent development across all capability domains in relation to peace-keeping, conflict prevention and strengthening international security, in accordance with the principles of the United Nations Charter, and the progressive framing of a common EU defence policy; calls on the Commission to outline in the future European Defence Action Plan their plans on space activities in support of security and defence;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 20. Takes the view that an EU-level
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Points out that moves to strengthen the Union’s space-based capabilities should be undertaken solely in order to increase its internal and external security; is of the opinion that steps taken to achieve the above aims should not be viewed as attempts to find ways of facilitating possible military intervention by Member States in non-member countries;
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new) 20a. Recalls that space debris is a growing problem for space security and calls on the EU to support research and develop active debris removal (ADR) technologies; encourages the EU to invest into establishment of international agreement providing a legal definition of space debris, rules and regulations concerning its removal, and clarifying liability issues; stresses the need for an enhanced global space situational awareness and calls for linking up the European SSA system with partners such as the US and for more confidence-building measures and information exchange with other counterparts;
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 21. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the European Council, the Council, the Commission, the Vice- President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Secretary- General of the United Nations, the Secretary-General of the North Atlantic Treaty Organi
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Union needs to contribute to the fight against terrorism at home and abroad, including by supporting third countries in combating terrorism and above all its root causes (poverty, social marginalisation, inequality); whereas the Union needs to make its external borders more secure;
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new) 21a. Notes that other actors, including Russia and China, develop ASAT capabilities; believes that these capabilities could be used against EU satellites; calls for extending sanctions regime against Russia to include space sector as a response to Russia's policies and to align with US sanctions regime;
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the Union needs to contribute to the fight against
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new) Ba. whereas the EU and the Member States have shown in the past their high dependency on US satellite communication and capability in times of crisis and for military applications, as it was the case of Libya;
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the Union needs to
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the Union needs to strengthen its resilience through cooperation and coordination
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the Union needs to strengthen its resilience through cooperation and coordination with the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, which remains the foundation of Europe's security and stability, with the United Nations and
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the Union needs to strengthen its resilience through cooperation and coordination with the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, with the United Nations
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas the Union needs to strengthen its resilience through cooperation and coordination with the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, especially the United States, as that country's initiatives are often the driving factor behind that development, and also with the United Nations and with its neighbours and regional partners;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 3 Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas the Union needs to address the root causes of the challenges to our security, of unrest and armed conflict in our neighbourhood, of migration, of the degradation of people’s livelihoods by state and non-state actors, and of the erosion of states and regional orders, including as a result of climate change and poverty, through a comprehensive rules and values- based approach to managing crises both inside and outside the Union;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new) Da. whereas satellite capabilities could be used to better assess and identify the flow of illegal immigrants, their routes and, in the case of those coming from the Northern Africa, to identify the ship boarding areas in order to engage them faster and save more lives;
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the European Council of June 2015, which focused on defence, called for the fostering of greater and more systematic European defence cooperation with a view to delivering key capabilities, including through the use of EU funds and existing EU capabilities;
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the European Council of June 2015, which focused on defence, called for the fostering of greater and more systematic European defence cooperation with a view to delivering key capabilities, including through the coherent and efficient use of EU funds;
Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas the European Council of June 2015, which focused on defence, called for the fostering of greater and
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) Ea. whereas space policy is an essential component of the strategic autonomy which the EU must develop in order to safeguard sensitive technological and industrial capabilities and independent capabilities to carry out assessments;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas space capabilities for European security and defence are appropriate for a
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas space capabilities for European security and defence are appropriate for a range of situations, ranging from day-to- day peacetime use to crisis management
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas space capabilities for European security and defence are
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 4 Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas space capabilities for European security and defence are appropriate for a range of situations, ranging from day-to- day peacetime use to crisis management and
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas space capabilities
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas proliferation of space technologies and rising dependency of societies on satellites increase competition over space assets (paths, frequencies) and make satellites a critical infrastructure; whereas development of anti-satellite (ASAT) technologies by a number of actors, including orbital weapons capabilities, signals weaponisation of space;
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) Fa. whereas space situational awareness plays a decisive role as a source of intelligence in military operations on land, at sea and in the air;
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas in the area of defence and security the Union might act
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas in the area of defence and security the Union acts among others through such institutions as the European Defence Agency and the EU Satellite Centre;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G.
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas European space assets have been developed over the last five decades thanks to the coordinated efforts of
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas developing and sustaining space capabilities for security and defence in Europe requires effective cooperation among Member States and with the European
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas developing and sustaining space capabilities for security and defence in Europe requires effective cooperation among Member States and with the European, international and transatlantic institutions;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 13 Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas developing and sustaining space capabilities for security and defence in Europe requires effective cooperation among Member States and with the European
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas developing and sustaining space capabilities for security and defence in Europe
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I I. whereas developing and sustaining space capabilities for security and defence in Europe requires effective cooperation
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new) Ia. whereas EU's space capabilities should be compatible with the capabilities of NATO and the US so it can be fully used as a network in the case of crisis;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I b (new) Ib. whereas protecting the existing and future space capabilities against all threats is as important as developing them; whereas the further development and implementation of the Space Situational Awareness (SSA) is vital for such an objective and should thus be part of all future EU space strategies;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Recital I c (new) Ic. whereas Research and Development in space technology is a sector with high investment return that also produces high quality software and hardware by- products with various commercial use;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Underlines that the use of space capabilities in the war against terrorism and terrorist organizations, through the ability of locating and monitoring their training camps, is vital;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that space-based capabilities and services play a key role in the context of European security and defence;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that space-based capabilities and services play a
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that space-based capabilities and services play a key role in the context of European security and defence; is convinced that current and future space- based capabilities and services will provide Member States and the Union with improved dual use operational capacity for the implementation of the common security and defence policy and of other EU policies in areas such as external action, border management, maritime security, agriculture, the environment, climate action, energy security, disaster management, humanitarian aid and transport;
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 15 a (new) - having regard to Decision No 541/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 establishing a Framework for Space Surveillance and Tracking Support;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that space-based capabilities and services play a key role, among other areas, in the context of European security and defence; is convinced that current and future space-
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 1. Considers that space-based capabilities and services play a key role in the context of European security and defence; is convinced that current and future space- based capabilities and services will provide
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that space capabilities should be used exclusively for peaceful purposes; recalls the obligation according to Article 41(2) of the Lisbon Treaty that "expenditure arising from operations having military or defence implications" shall not be charged to the Union budget; therefore underscores that no EU budget funds shall be used to finance space capabilities including Galileo and Copernicus as long as they are having military implications;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Considers that further implementation of the CSDP is needed; reaffirms the need to increase the effectiveness, visibility and impact of the CSDP; reaffirms the importance and the added value of the Space Policy to the CSDP; considers that Space should be included in future Union policies (e.g. internal security, transport, space, energy, research) and synergies with Space should be further strengthened and exploited;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Believes that the Union should improve access to space-based communication, situational awareness, precision navigation and Earth
Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Believes that the Union should improve space-based satellite communication, space situational awareness, precision navigation and Earth observation capabilities, and ensure European non- dependence as regards critical space technologies and access to space; recognises that in order to achieve this goal sufficient financial investment is needed;
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Believes that the Union should improve space-based communication, situational awareness, precision navigation and Earth observation capabilities, and ensure European non-dependence as regards critical space technologies and access to space; underlines the commitment for non-militarisation of the space;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Believes that the Union should improve space-based communication, situational awareness, precision navigation and Earth observation capabilities, and ensure European non-dependence as regards critical space technologies and access to space; in this connection urges the Commission and the Member States to guarantee the autonomy of the EU as regards space structures, while providing the resources necessary for that purpose; takes the view that this aim is vitally important for civilian activities (in Western countries it is estimated that between 6 and 7% of GDP is dependent on satellite positioning and navigation technology) and for security and defence;
Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 2. Believes that
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Underlines the security dimension of the Copernicus programme, particularly applications aiming at prevention and response to crisis, humanitarian aid and cooperation, conflict prevention entailing the monitoring of compliance with international treaties, and maritime surveillance; urges the HR, the Commission and the Member States to strengthen the conflict prevention objective of space capabilities;
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 16 a (new) - having regard to Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilizing the situation in Ukraine;
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Considers that space situational awareness in particular is going to continue to play a vital role in military and civilian affairs; further believes that capability development of space situational awareness is needed to ensure the security of EU borders and to enhance member state military and civilian intelligence capacity;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Believes that in order to enhance space situational awareness, capabilities to launch small satellites and rockets are needed; points out that existing European infrastructure to launch smaller satellites and rockets, such as Esrange, requires small investments in comparison to other projects worldwide in order to accommodate additional small-size enterprises;
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that the Union
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that the Union’s space policy might have the potential to promote
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that the Union’s space policy promotes scientific and technical progress, industrial competitiveness and the implementation of all EU policies,
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that the Union’s space policy promotes scientific and technical progress, industrial competitiveness and the implementation of all EU policies, including security and defence policy; invites the Council, the VP/HR and the Commission to ensure that European space programmes develop space-based capabilities and services for European security and defence, namely through the allocation of adequate funds for research;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that the Union’s space policy promotes scientific and technical progress, industrial competitiveness and the implementation of all EU policies,
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Recalls that the Union
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers a holistic, integrated and long- term approach to the space sector at an EU level to be necessary; believes that the space sector should be
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers a holistic, integrated and long- term approach to the space sector at an EU level to be necessary; believes that the space sector should be one of the priorities for the new EU Global Strategy on Foreign
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers a holistic, integrated and long- term approach to the space sector at an EU level to be necessary; believes that the space sector should be one of the priorities
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers a holistic, integrated and long- term approach to the space sector at an EU level to be necessary; believes that the space sector should be one of the priorities for the new EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy, bearing in mind the need to further develop EU civil space programmes that can be used for both civil and military purposes;
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Considers a holistic, integrated and long- term approach to the space sector at an EU level to be necessary; believes that the space sector should be one of the priorities for the new EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy, bearing in mind the need to develop EU civil space programmes that can be used for both civil and
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4.
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Welcomes equally the EU-sponsored multilateral initiative towards an International Code of Conduct for Space Activities as a way of introducing norms of behaviour in space as it seeks to achieve enhanced safety, security, and sustainability in space by emphasising that space activities should involve a high degree of care, due diligence, and appropriate transparency, with the aim of building confidence among space sector;
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Asks the Commission to come up swiftly with a definition of the EU needs regarding the potential contribution of the Space policy to the CSDP for all the main aspects: launching, positioning, imagery, communication, space weather, debris, cyber security, jam , ground security; considers that future space features of the current European systems should be set according to the CSDP requirements and covering all above related aspects;
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Asks for defining the necessary requirements for future systems, private or public, which participate to safety of life applications (e.g. positioning, ATM air traffic management) with regards to the protection against possible security attacks (jamming, spoofing, cyber attacks, space weather and debris); considers that such safety requirements should be certifiable and under the surveillance of an European entity (EASA could be a possibility);
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that cooperation between the Commission, the European External Action Service, the European Defence Agency, the European Space Agency and the Member States is crucial to improving European space capabilities and services; takes the view that the
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas the increasingly dangerous and challenging security environment within and outside the Union, characterised by
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that cooperation between the Commission, the European External Action Service, the European Defence Agency, the European Space Agency and the Member States is crucial to improving European space capabilities and services; takes the view that the Union should coordinate, facilitate and support such cooperation in the area of space security and defence trough a specific operational coordination centre;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 5. Stresses that cooperation between the Commission, the European External Action Service, the European Defence Agency, the European Space Agency and the Member States is crucial to improving European space capabilities and services; takes the view that the Union, namely the VP/HR, should coordinate, facilitate and support such cooperation in the area of security and defence; express its conviction that the European Space Agency should play a significant role in the implementation of security and defence policy;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Calls on the European Commission to present results of the established European Framework Cooperation for Security and Defence Research on space and asks for recommendations on how to develop it further; calls on the Commission to clarify how civilian- military research under Horizon 2020 served in the area of space capabilities the implementation of the Common Security and Defence Policy;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Welcomes the Framework for Space Surveillance and Tracking Support; calls on the European Commission to inform the Parliament on the implementation of the framework and its impact on security and defence; calls on the Commission to set up an implementing road map covering the definition of the envisaged architecture;
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Recognises the crucial nature of the relationship between the Union and the European Space Agency;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Recognises the crucial nature of the relationship between the Union and the European Space Agency; is convinced that the European Space Agency should play a significant role in the definition and implementation of
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Recognises the crucial nature of the relationship between the Union and the European Space Agency; is convinced that the
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
source: 577.056
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
committees/0/associated |
Old
TrueNew
|
events/4/docs |
|
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE572.951New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-572951_EN.html |
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.056New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-577056_EN.html |
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.369&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-575369_EN.html |
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/2/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/3 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/6 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs/3/body |
EC
|
events/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0151&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2016-0151_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0267New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2016-0267_EN.html |
activities |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
AFET/8/04820New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
activities/3 |
|
activities/4/docs |
|
activities/4/type |
Old
Vote in plenary scheduledNew
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading |
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
activities/3 |
|
activities/2/docs/0/text |
|
activities/3/date |
Old
2016-06-06T00:00:00New
2016-06-07T00:00:00 |
activities/3/type |
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single readingNew
Debate in plenary scheduled |
activities/4 |
|
activities/2/docs |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/2 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/1 |
|
activities/1 |
|
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/0/committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
activities/0/committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
activities/2 |
|
activities/0/committees/0/date |
2015-09-15T00:00:00
|
activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1 |
|
committees/0/date |
2015-09-15T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|