BETA

Procedure completed



Activites

  • 2016/06/08 Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2016/06/07 Debate in Parliament
  • 2016/04/26 Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    • A8-0151/2016 summary
  • 2016/04/19 Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • 2015/10/29 Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading

Documents

AmendmentsDossier
262 2015/2276(INI)
2016/02/29 ITRE 62 amendments...
source: 578.535
2016/03/01 AFET 200 amendments...
source: 577.056

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

activities
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian group: ECR name: KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica group: GUE/NGL name: LÖSING Sabine group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2015-09-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: ZDROJEWSKI Bogdan Andrzej body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2015-10-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean
  • date: 2016-04-19T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian group: ECR name: KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław group: ALDE name: NICOLAI Norica group: GUE/NGL name: LÖSING Sabine group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2015-09-15T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: ZDROJEWSKI Bogdan Andrzej body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2015-10-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean
  • date: 2016-04-26T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0151&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0151/2016 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2016-06-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160607&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-06-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0267 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0267/2016 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2015-09-15T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ZDROJEWSKI Bogdan Andrzej group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2015-09-15T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: EPP name: ZDROJEWSKI Bogdan Andrzej
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
True
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2015-10-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ITRE
date
2015-10-28T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee)
rapporteur
group: EPP name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean
docs
  • date: 2016-01-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE572.951 title: PE572.951 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2016-03-01T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE577.056 title: PE577.056 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE575.369&secondRef=02 title: PE575.369 committee: ITRE type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2016-11-18T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=27134&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)612 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 type: Referral to associated committees announced in Parliament body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-19T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2016-04-26T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0151&language=EN title: A8-0151/2016 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI (EPPE, PL) on space capabilities for European security and defence. The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy exercising its prerogatives as an associated committee in accordance with Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure , also gave its opinion on the report. Members recalled that space policy is an essential component of the strategic autonomy which the EU must develop in order to safeguard sensitive technological and industrial capabilities and independent capabilities to carry out assessments. Role of space-based capabilities and services : Members considered that space-based capabilities and services play an important role in the context of European security and defence and EU policies in areas such as external action, border management, maritime security, agriculture, the environment, climate action, energy security, disaster management, humanitarian aid and transport. In this context, the report reaffirmed the importance and the added value of the Space Policy to the CSDP and that space should be included in future Union policies (e.g. internal security, transport, space, energy, research). It stressed the importance of: the use of space capabilities in the war against terrorism and terrorist organisations, through the ability to locate and monitor their training camps; improving access to space-based satellite communication , space situational awareness, precision navigation and Earth observation capabilities, and ensure European non-dependence as regards critical space technologies and access to space; sufficient financial investment to guarantee the autonomy of the EU as regards space structures, while providing the resources necessary for that purpose. Space Programmes : Members recalled that the two EU flagship programmes – Galileo and Copernicus – are civil programmes under civil control and that the European nature of Galileo and Copernicus has made these programmes possible and ensured their success. They wanted to ensure that European space programmes develop civilian space-based capabilities and services with relevance for European security and defence capabilities, particularly through the allocation of adequate funds for research. Bearing in mind the dual-use capacity of EU space capabilities, Members considered that a holistic, integrated, long-term approach to the space sector at EU level is necessary, and that the space sector should be mentioned in the new EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy. The EU’s needs and strategic objectives : Members asked the Commission to come up swiftly with a definition of EU needs regarding the potential contribution of the space policy to the CSDP for all the main aspects: launching, positioning, imagery, communication, space weather, space debris, cyber security, jamming, spoofing and other intentional threats, security of the ground segment. The development of European space capabilities for European security and defence should follow two key strategic objectives: security on the planet through in-orbit space systems designed to monitor the earth’s surface or to provide positioning, navigation and timing information or satellite communications and security in outer space as well as space safety , i.e. security in orbit and in space through ground-based and in-orbit space situational awareness systems. Operational coordination : the report stressed that cooperation between the Commission, the European External Action Service, the GNSS Agency, the European Defence Agency, the European Space Agency and the Member States is crucial to improving European space capabilities and services. The Union should coordinate and support such cooperation through a specific operational coordination centre . The report also suggested, inter alia: stimulating space innovation and research for security and defence and innovative big data technologies to make use of the full potential of space data for security and defence; the development of the EU's various diplomatic initiatives in space issues, in both a bilateral and a multilateral context, in order to contribute to the development of the institutionalisation of space; setting up a permanent programme and to use the European added value of the EDA for military satellite communication as well; identifying any potential technological gap to facilitate EU-US cooperation on future space-based capabilities; continuing to facilitate the establishment of an international code of conduct on outer space activities, in order to protect space infrastructure while preventing a weaponisation of space; ensuring that space situational awareness / space weather, satellite communication, electronic intelligence and early warning could benefit from greater cooperation between the public and private sectors, and additional EU-level support; assessing how to meet the operational need for very high resolution earth observation data under the Copernicus programme; the further development of the EU’s own Space Surveillance and Tracking (SST) capacities; developing policies and research capabilities in order to provide future applications and develop a competitive European industry, capable of commercial success based on a healthy economic environment; establishing the correct regulatory and policy frameworks in order to give industry further impetus and incentives to pursue technological development and research into space capabilities. Members welcomed the process and plans for the development of new European launchers Ariane 6 and VEGA, and considered the development of these launchers to be crucial to the long-term viability and independence of the European space programmes. They noted the strategic importance of independent access to space and the need for dedicated EU action, including with regard to security and defence. Lastly, Members considered that creating in the long term a legal framework permitting sustained EU-level investments in security and defence capabilities could foster greater and more systematic European defence cooperation with a view to delivering key capabilities.
  • date: 2016-06-07T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160607&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2016-06-08T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=27134&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2016-06-08T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0267 title: T8-0267/2016 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 446 votes to 156, with 71 abstentions, a resolution on space capabilities for European security and defence. Members recalled that space policy is an essential component of the strategic autonomy which the EU must develop in order to safeguard sensitive technological and industrial capabilities and independent capabilities to carry out assessments. They stressed that space capabilities for European security and defence are important and, in some cases, even vital for a multitude of situations, ranging from day-to-day peacetime use to crisis management and more acute security challenges, including full-scale warfare. The development of future capabilities needs to be programmed when current capabilities are being deployed. Role of space-based capabilities and services : Parliament considered that space-based capabilities and services play an important role in the context of European security and defence and EU policies in areas such as external action, border management, maritime security, agriculture, the environment, climate action, energy security, disaster management, humanitarian aid and transport. In this context, Parliament reaffirmed the importance and the added value of the Space Policy to the CSDP and that space should be included in future Union policies (e.g. internal security, transport, space, energy, research). It also stressed the importance of: the use of space capabilities in the war against terrorism and terrorist organisations; improving access to space-based satellite communication , space situational awareness, precision navigation and Earth observation capabilities, and ensure European non-dependence as regards critical space technologies and access to space; the use of satellite capabilities to better assess and identify the flow of illegal immigrants and their routes, and, in the case of those coming from Northern Africa, to identify the ship-boarding areas in order to engage with them faster and save more lives; sufficient financial investment to guarantee the autonomy of the EU as regards space structures, while providing the resources necessary for that purpose. Space Programmes : Parliament recalled that the two EU flagship programmes – Galileo and Copernicus – are civil programmes under civil control and that the European nature of Galileo and Copernicus has made these programmes possible and ensured their success. They wanted to ensure that European space programmes develop civilian space-based capabilities and services with relevance for European security and defence capabilities , particularly through the allocation of adequate funds for research. Bearing in mind the dual-use capacity of EU space capabilities, Members considered that a holistic, integrated, long-term approach to the space sector at EU level is necessary, and that the space sector should be mentioned in the new EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy. Parliament noted the importance of Galileo’s Public Regulated Service (PRS) for navigation and guidance of military systems; calls on the High Representative and the EU Member States to increase their efforts regarding a possible revision of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty or to initiate a new regulatory framework that takes account of technological progress since the 1960s and aims to prevent an arms race in space . Members encouraged the identification and development of security- and defence-related capacity needs for the next generations of the Galileo and Copernicus systems. The EU’s needs and strategic objectives : Parliament asked the Commission to come up swiftly with a definition of EU needs regarding the potential contribution of the space policy to the CSDP for all the main aspects: launching, positioning, imagery, communication, space weather, space debris, cyber security, jamming, spoofing and other intentional threats, security of the ground segment. The development of European space capabilities for European security and defence should follow two key strategic objectives : security on the planet through in-orbit space systems designed to monitor the earth’s surface or to provide positioning, navigation and timing information or satellite communications and security in outer space as well as space safety , i.e. security in orbit and in space through ground-based and in-orbit space situational awareness systems. Operational coordination : the resolution stressed that cooperation between the Commission, the European External Action Service, the GNSS Agency, the European Defence Agency, the European Space Agency and the Member States is crucial to improving European space capabilities and services. The Union should coordinate and support such cooperation through a specific operational coordination centre . Parliament also suggested, inter alia: stimulating space innovation and research for security and defence and innovative big data technologies to make use of the full potential of space data for security and defence; the development of the EU's various diplomatic initiatives in space issues, in both a bilateral and a multilateral context, in order to contribute to the development of the institutionalisation of space; setting up a permanent programme and to use the European added value of the EDA for military satellite communication as well; identifying any potential technological gap to facilitate EU-US cooperation on future space-based capabilities; strengthen EU-NATO cooperation in the area of security and defence policy and in collective defence; continuing to facilitate the establishment of an international code of conduct on outer space activities, in order to protect space infrastructure while preventing a weaponisation of space; ensuring that space situational awareness / space weather, satellite communication, electronic intelligence and early warning could benefit from greater cooperation between the public and private sectors, and additional EU-level support; assessing how to meet the operational need for very high resolution earth observation data under the Copernicus programme; the further development of the EU’s own Space Surveillance and Tracking (SST) capacities; developing policies and research capabilities in order to provide future applications and develop a competitive European industry, capable of commercial success based on a healthy economic environment; establishing the correct regulatory and policy frameworks in order to give industry further impetus and incentives to pursue technological development and research into space capabilities. Parliament welcomed the process and plans for the development of new European launchers Ariane 6 and VEGA, and considered the development of these launchers to be crucial to the long-term viability and independence of the European space programmes. It noted the strategic importance of independent access to space and the need for dedicated EU action, including with regard to security and defence. Lastly, Parliament considered that creating in the long term a legal framework permitting sustained EU-level investments in security and defence capabilities could foster greater and more systematic European defence cooperation with a view to delivering key capabilities.
  • date: 2016-06-08T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
    procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
    Old
    AFET/8/04820
    New
    • AFET/8/04820
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure EP 54
    procedure/legal_basis/0
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    procedure/subject
    Old
    • 3.40.05 Aeronautical industry, aerospace industry
    • 6.10.02 Common security and defence policy; WEU, NATO
    New
    3.40.05
    Aeronautical industry, aerospace industry
    3.50.03
    European space policy
    6.10.02
    Common security and defence policy (CSDP); WEU, NATO
    activities/3
    date
    2016-06-07T00:00:00
    docs
    url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20160607&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
    body
    EP
    type
    Debate in Parliament
    activities/4/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2016-0267 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0267/2016
    activities/4/type
    Old
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    New
    Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    New
    Procedure completed
    activities/3
    date
    2016-06-07T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/2/docs/0/text
    • The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Bogdan Andrzej ZDROJEWSKI (EPPE, PL) on space capabilities for European security and defence.

      The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy exercising its prerogatives as an associated committee in accordance with Rule 54 of the Rules of Procedure, also gave its opinion on the report.

      Members recalled that space policy is an essential component of the strategic autonomy which the EU must develop in order to safeguard sensitive technological and industrial capabilities and independent capabilities to carry out assessments.

      Role of space-based capabilities and services: Members considered that space-based capabilities and services play an important role in the context of European security and defence and EU policies in areas such as external action, border management, maritime security, agriculture, the environment, climate action, energy security, disaster management, humanitarian aid and transport.

      In this context, the report reaffirmed the importance and the added value of the Space Policy to the CSDP and that space should be included in future Union policies (e.g. internal security, transport, space, energy, research). It stressed the importance of:

      • the use of space capabilities in the war against terrorism and terrorist organisations, through the ability to locate and monitor their training camps;
      • improving access to space-based satellite communication, space situational awareness, precision navigation and Earth observation capabilities, and ensure European non-dependence as regards critical space technologies and access to space; 
      • sufficient financial investment to guarantee the autonomy of the EU as regards space structures, while providing the resources necessary for that purpose.

      Space Programmes: Members recalled that the two EU flagship programmes – Galileo and Copernicus – are civil programmes under civil control and that the European nature of Galileo and Copernicus has made these programmes possible and ensured their success. They wanted to ensure that European space programmes develop civilian space-based capabilities and services with relevance for European security and defence capabilities, particularly through the allocation of adequate funds for research.

      Bearing in mind the dual-use capacity of EU space capabilities, Members considered that a holistic, integrated, long-term approach to the space sector at EU level is necessary, and that the space sector should be mentioned in the new EU Global Strategy on Foreign and Security Policy.

      The EU’s needs and strategic objectives: Members asked the Commission to come up swiftly with a definition of EU needs regarding the potential contribution of the space policy to the CSDP for all the main aspects: launching, positioning, imagery, communication, space weather, space debris, cyber security, jamming, spoofing and other intentional threats, security of the ground segment.

      The development of European space capabilities for European security and defence should follow two key strategic objectives:

      • security on the planet through in-orbit space systems designed to monitor the earth’s surface or to provide positioning, navigation and timing information or satellite communications and
      • security in outer space as well as space safety, i.e. security in orbit and in space through ground-based and in-orbit space situational awareness systems.

      Operational coordination: the report stressed that cooperation between the Commission, the European External Action Service, the GNSS Agency, the European Defence Agency, the European Space Agency and the Member States is crucial to improving European space capabilities and services. The Union should coordinate and support such cooperation through a specific operational coordination centre.

      The report also suggested, inter alia:

      • stimulating space innovation and research for security and defence and innovative big data technologies to make use of the full potential of space data for security and defence;
      • the development of the EU's various diplomatic initiatives in space issues, in both a bilateral and a multilateral context, in order to contribute to the development of the institutionalisation of space;
      • setting up a permanent programme and to use the European added value of the EDA for military satellite communication as well;
      • identifying any potential technological gap to facilitate EU-US cooperation on future space-based capabilities;
      • continuing to facilitate the establishment of an international code of conduct on outer space activities, in order to protect space infrastructure while preventing a weaponisation of space; 
      • ensuring that space situational awareness / space weather, satellite communication, electronic intelligence and early warning could benefit from greater cooperation between the public and private sectors, and additional EU-level support;
      • assessing how to meet the operational need for very high resolution earth observation data under the Copernicus programme;
      • the further development of the EU’s own Space Surveillance and Tracking (SST) capacities;
      • developing policies and research capabilities in order to provide future applications and develop a competitive European industry, capable of commercial success based on a healthy economic environment; 
      • establishing the correct regulatory and policy frameworks in order to give industry further impetus and incentives to pursue technological development and research into space capabilities.

      Members welcomed the process and plans for the development of new European launchers Ariane 6 and VEGA, and considered the development of these launchers to be crucial to the long-term viability and independence of the European space programmes. They noted the strategic importance of independent access to space and the need for dedicated EU action, including with regard to security and defence.

      Lastly, Members considered that creating in the long term a legal framework permitting sustained EU-level investments in security and defence capabilities could foster greater and more systematic European defence cooperation with a view to delivering key capabilities.

    activities/3/date
    Old
    2016-06-06T00:00:00
    New
    2016-06-07T00:00:00
    activities/3/type
    Old
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    New
    Debate in plenary scheduled
    activities/4
    date
    2016-06-08T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in plenary scheduled
    activities/2/docs
    • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2016-0151&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0151/2016
    activities/2
    date
    2016-04-26T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    activities/2
    date
    2016-04-26T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    activities/2
    date
    2016-04-26T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
    procedure/stage_reached
    Old
    Awaiting committee decision
    New
    Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
    activities/1
    date
    2016-04-19T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    committees
    activities/1
    date
    2016-04-19T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows/1
    group
    ECR
    name
    KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław
    committees/0/shadows/1
    group
    ECR
    name
    KRASNODĘBSKI Zdzisław
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows/1
    group
    ALDE
    name
    NICOLAI Norica
    committees/0/shadows/1
    group
    ALDE
    name
    NICOLAI Norica
    activities/0/committees/0/shadows
    • group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian
    • group: GUE/NGL name: LÖSING Sabine
    • group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek
    committees/0/shadows
    • group: S&D name: FRUNZULICĂ Doru-Claudian
    • group: GUE/NGL name: LÖSING Sabine
    • group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek
    activities/2
    date
    2016-06-06T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
    activities/0/committees/0/date
    2015-09-15T00:00:00
    activities/0/committees/0/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: ZDROJEWSKI Bogdan Andrzej
    activities/1
    date
    2016-04-19T00:00:00
    body
    EP
    type
    Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
    committees/0/date
    2015-09-15T00:00:00
    committees/0/rapporteur
    • group: EPP name: ZDROJEWSKI Bogdan Andrzej
    activities
    • date: 2015-10-29T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) committee: AFET body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2015-10-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean
    committees
    • body: EP responsible: True committee_full: Foreign Affairs (Associated committee) committee: AFET
    • body: EP responsible: False committee: ITRE date: 2015-10-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy (Associated committee) rapporteur: group: EPP name: MARINESCU Marian-Jean
    links
    other
      procedure
      dossier_of_the_committee
      AFET/8/04820
      reference
      2015/2276(INI)
      title
      Space capabilities for European security and defence
      legal_basis
      Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
      stage_reached
      Awaiting committee decision
      subtype
      Initiative
      type
      INI - Own-initiative procedure
      subject