3 Amendments of Filiz HYUSMENOVA related to 2016/0407(COD)
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 17
Recital 17
(17) National authorities responsible for return may differ significantly among Member States, and such authorities may also vary within a Member State depending on the reasons for illegal stay. Judicial authorities may also issue return decisions in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC, for instance as result of appeals against a refusal of granting an authorisation or right to stay, or as a criminal sanction. All national authorities in charge of issuing and enforcing return decisions in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC should be entitled to access SIS in order to enter, update, delete and search alerts on return.
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1
Article 3 – paragraph 1
1. Data on third-country nationals subject to a return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC shall be entered in SIS for the purpose of verifying that the obligation to return has been complied with and for supporting the enforcement of the decision. An alert shall be entered in SIS without delayas soon as possible when the return decision is issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Article 9 – paragraph 1
1. Without prejudice to Articles 6 and 8, alerts on return shall be deleted when the decision upon which the alert was based has been withdrawn or annulled by the competent authority. Alerts on return shall also be deleted when the third-country national concerned can demonstrate that they havehas left the territory of the Member States in compliance with a return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC.