Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | LIBE | LENAERS Jeroen ( PPE) | DALLI Miriam ( S&D), HALLA-AHO Jussi ( ECR), DEPREZ Gérard ( ALDE), JOLY Eva ( Verts/ALE), MEUTHEN Jörg ( EFDD), FONTANA Lorenzo ( ENF) |
Committee Opinion | DEVE | ||
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | AFET | VAUTMANS Hilde ( ALDE) | Mariya GABRIEL ( PPE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
TFEU 079-p2
Legal Basis:
TFEU 079-p2Events
PURPOSE: to improve the use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) 2018/1860 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of the Schengen Information System for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals.
CONTENT: the Regulation lays down lays down the conditions and procedures for the entry and processing of alerts in respect of third-country nationals subject to return decisions issued by the Member States in the Schengen Information System (SIS) established by Regulation (EU) 2018/1861, as well as for exchanging supplementary information on such alerts.
The Regulation is accompanied by two other Regulations on the use of the SIS in the field of border checks and police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters .
Entry of alerts on return into SIS
Member States shall enter into SIS alerts on third-country nationals subject to a return decision for the purpose of verifying that the obligation to return has been complied with and of supporting the enforcement of the return decisions. An alert on return shall be entered into SIS without delay following issue of a return decision.
Member States may refrain from entering alerts on return when the return decision is issued at the external border of a Member State and is executed immediately.
The alert shall indicate whether a period for voluntary departure has been granted to the third-country national concerned, including whether such period has been extended and whether the decision has been suspended or removal has been postponed.
Categories of data
The Regulation determines the categories of data to be entered into SIS in respect of a third-country national who is the subject of a return decision. Alerts on return should contain only those data that are necessary to identify the data subjects, to allow the competent authorities to take informed decisions without losing time and to ensure, where necessary, the protection of those authorities from persons who are, for example, armed, violent, have escaped or are involved in a terrorist activity.
Given the reliability of identifying persons using fingerprints and photographs or facial images, they shall always be inserted in alerts on return. As they may not be available, for example, when a return decision is taken in absentia, it should exceptionally be possible to derogate from this requirement in such cases.
The exchange of supplementary information provided by the national competent authorities on third-country nationals subject to alerts on return, shall always be carried out through the network of national offices called SIRENE Bureaux serving as point of contact.
Confirmation of return
In the event of a hit on an alert on return concerning a third‑country national who is exiting the territory of the Member States through the external border of a Member State, the executing Member State shall communicate the following information to the issuing Member State through the exchange of supplementary information - that the third-country national has been subject to removal, if this is the case.
The Regulation also describes the procedures that shall apply in the event of a hit at the external borders to entry into the territory of the Member States through the external borders.
Consultations between Member States
The Regulation lays down mandatory rules for consultation between Member States in order to avoid or reconcile conflicting instructions.
Consultations should be carried out where third-country nationals who hold, or are being granted, a valid residence permit or a long-stay visa by a Member State are subject to an alert on return issued by another Member State, in particular if the return decision is accompanied by an entry ban, or where conflicting situations may arise at entry in the territories of the Member States.
Deletion of alerts
Alerts on return shall be deleted when the decision on the basis of which the alert was entered has been withdrawn or annulled by the competent authority. Alerts on return shall also be deleted when the third-country national concerned can demonstrate that he or she has left the territory of the Member States in compliance with the respective return decision.
Transfer of personal data to third countries
Personal data obtained by a Member State pursuant to this Regulation shall not be transferred or made available to any third country. As a derogation to that rule, it shall be possible to transfer such personal data to a third country where the transfer is subject to strict conditions and is necessary in individual cases in order to assist with the identification of a third-country national for the purposes of his or her return.
Access to data
Europol shall have access to all categories of data in the SIS and shall exchange supplementary information with the SIRENE offices of the Member States. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency shall also have access to the different categories of alerts in the SIS.
ENTRY INTO FORCE: 27.12.2018.
The European Parliament adopted by 500 votes to 103, with 41 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of the Schengen Information System for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amended the Commission proposal as follows:
Purpose : the proposed Regulation shall down the conditions and procedures for the entry and processing of alerts in respect of third-country nationals subject to return decisions issued by the Member States in the Schengen Information System (SIS), as well as for exchanging supplementary information on such alerts.
Member States shall implement this Regulation in full respect of the Charter of Fundamental Rights , including the respect of the principle of non-refoulement, and shall always take into consideration the best interests of the child, family life, and the state of health or condition of vulnerability of the individuals concerned.
Introduction of data into the SIS : in order to ensure the effectiveness of returns, Member States shall enter alerts into SIS in relation to return decisions they issue in respect of illegally staying third-country nationals. In certain circumstances, Member States may refrain from entering alerts on return into SIS where the risk of the return decision not being complied with is low, namely during any period of detention or when the return decision is issued at the external border and is executed immediately, in order to reduce their administrative burden.
Alerts on return shall be automatically deleted as soon as they expire.
Categories of data : the amended text provides for the introduction of new categories of data in the SIS. Given the reliability of identifying persons using fingerprints and photographs or facial images , they shall always be inserted in alerts on return. As they may not be available, for example, when a return decision is taken in absentia, it shall exceptionally be possible to derogate from this requirement in such cases.
Competent authorities : the exchange of supplementary information provided by the national competent authorities on third-country nationals subject to alerts on return, shall always be carried out through the network of national offices called SIRENE Bureaux serving as point of contact.
Confirmation of return : in the event of a hit on an alert on return concerning a third‑country national who is exiting the territory of the Member States through the external border of a Member State, the executing Member State shall communicate the following information to the issuing Member State through the exchange of supplementary information - that the third-country national has been subject to removal, if this is the case.
The amended text also describes the procedures that shall apply in the event of a hit at the external borders to entry into the territory of the Member States through the external borders.
Consultations : this Regulation shall establish mandatory rules for consultation between Member States to avoid or reconcile conflicting instructions. Provisions have been introduced with regard to this:
prior consultation before granting or extending a residence permit or long-stay visa; prior consultation before entering an alert on return; posteriori consultation after entering an alert on return; consultation in the case of a hit concerning a third‑country national holding a valid residence permit or long-stay visa.
Transfer of personal data to third countries : personal data obtained by a Member State pursuant to this Regulation shall not be transferred or made available to any third country. As a derogation to that rule, it shall be possible to transfer such personal data to a third country where the transfer is subject to strict conditions and is necessary in individual cases in order to assist with the identification of a third-country national for the purposes of his or her return.
Lastly, Member States shall provide statistics to eu-LISA on an annual basis on the exchanges of information carried out in accordance with Articles 8 to 12 and on the instances in which the deadlines provided for in those Articles were not met.
The Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs adopted the report by Jeroen LENAERS (EPP, NL) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of the Schengen Information System (SIS) for the return of illegally staying third-country nationals.
The committee recommended that the European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the Commission proposal as follows.
Introduction of data into the SIS : data on third-country nationals subject to a return decision shall be entered in SIS immediately after the decision becomes effective under the national legislation of the respective Member State for the purpose of verifying that the obligation to return has been complied with and for supporting the enforcement of the decision.
Member States may elect not to enter data on third-country nationals subject to a return decision when it concerns third-country nationals who are placed in detention until removal.
The period for voluntary departure granted to third-country nationals subject to a return decision issued shall be immediately recorded in the alert. Where this period is extended, the alert shall be immediately updated accordingly.
Suspension or postponement of execution of the return decision : Members proposed that Member States should make an existing alert related to return in SIS temporarily unavailable upon the suspension or postponement of the enforcement of the return decision or where an appeal has been lodged against a return decision which may lead to the suspension of its enforcement. If the return decision is overturned the alert shall be deleted immediately.
Data categories : the data entered in the SIS shall also include information on whether the return decision can be appealed and whether an appeal is pending against the return decision. Fingerprint data shall always be preferred over photographs and facial images.
Authority responsible for the exchange of supplementary information : Members suggested that each Member State shall designate a national authority that is fully operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week , to ensure the exchange and availability of all supplementary information on third-country nationals who are the subject of a return decision. Member States may designate their SIRENE Bureau as their national authority.
Members stated that where a third-country national who is the subject of an alert on return is identified when entering through the external borders, the Member State that identified the third-country national concerned shall inform the issuing Member State as soon as possible and in any event within 12 hours through the exchange of supplementary information in order to delete the alert.
Transfer of personal data to third countries : the data may only be exchanged if the third country explicitly undertakes to use the data only for the purpose for which it they were provided and if the third-country national concerned has been informed that his or her personal data and supplementary information will be shared with the authorities of a third country.
Non-refoulement, best interests of the child, family life and state of health : when implementing this Regulation, Member States shall take due account of the best interests of the child, family life, the state of health of the third-country national concerned and whether the third-country national is a vulnerable persons.
In any event, any measures to return third-country nationals shall fully respect the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the principle of non-refoulement.
PURPOSE: to reform the Schengen Information System (SIS) in order to provide for the integration of alerts in the SIS concerning the return of illegally staying third-country nationals to the territory of the Member States.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: in 2016, the Commission carried out a comprehensive evaluation of SIS , three years after the entry into operation of its second generation. This evaluation showed that SIS has been a genuine operational success.
Nonetheless, the effectiveness and efficiency of the system should be further strengthened. To this end, the Commission is presenting a first set of three proposals to improve and extend the use of SIS as result of the evaluation while continuing its work to make existing and future law enforcement and border management systems more interoperable.
These proposals cover the use of the system for:
border management , police cooperation and judicial cooperation in criminal matters , and the return of illegally staying third country nationals .
CONTENT: this proposal lays down the conditions and procedures for the entry and processing in the Schengen Information System (SIS) of alerts in respect of third-country nationals subject to return decisions issued by the Member States in accordance with procedures respecting Directive 2008/115/EC , as well as for exchanging supplementary information on such alerts.
Purpose : the purpose of the present proposal is to improve and extend the use of SIS by making it obligatory for Member States' authorities to enter in SIS all return decisions issued, to allow their EU-wide visibility and thus enhance their enforcement.
The use of SIS for return is aimed at assisting immigration authorities in following up and enforcing the return of third-country nationals who have no right to stay in the Member States. It also helps to prevent and deter irregular migration and to enhance information sharing and cooperation between immigration authorities.
Entering alerts on return : in order to facilitate the exchange of information between competent authorities, the proposal lays down the purpose and rules for entering alerts on return in SIS to allow the competent authorities to verify that the obligation to return has been complied with. The alert should be without delay entered as soon as the decision has been issued to the illegally staying third-country national concerned, in order to allow the verification referred to above. The alert should indicate if a period for voluntary departure is still running or if a decision has been suspended or removal has been postponed.
Where there are no reasons to believe that it would undermine the purpose of return procedures, voluntary return should be preferred over forced return and a period for voluntary departure should be granted to the returnee.
The duration of the period for voluntary departure, and any prolongation thereof, should be indicated in the alert to allow public authorities to decide whether it is appropriate to take action in the individual case.
Exchange of information between the competent authorities : the proposal lays down ca tegories of data that can be contained in a return alert.
Effective and timely cooperation and exchange of supplementary information between Member States requires the set-up of single point of contact .
To improve the efficiency of the EU's return policy, Member States shall be obliged to confirm the departure of the third-country national subject to an alert on return to the Member State (or authority) that entered the alert . This provision shall allow the authorities issuing and enforcing return decisions to verify that the obligation to return has been complied with.
Non-compliance with an obligation to return : the proposal sets out the provisions in cases of non-compliance with the obligation to return. A series of procedures are provided to deal with situations where a third-country national subject to an alert on return is identified and apprehended in another Member State (passing back the third-country national to the issuing Member State).
Access and management of data : provisions are provided regarding:
alerts on return need to be deleted following the return of the third-country national concerned; the opportunity to keep trace in SIS of return decisions after the return was enforced will be explored. This information could be useful if a third country national re-entered the territory of the Member States and is found as illegally staying in a different Member State than the one who issued the first return decision; enabling the authorities responsible for issuing return decisions to be able to access SIS in order to enter, update, delete and search data (the authorities concerned are listed in the proposal).
BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS: the cost-estimate of EUR 3.6 million from 2018 to 2020 includes costs for the technical upgrade of SIS for the purpose of return.
Documents
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2018/1860
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 312 07.12.2018, p. 0001
- Draft final act: 00034/2018/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)755
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T8-0414/2018
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A8-0348/2017
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE609.652
- Contribution: COM(2016)0881
- Committee opinion: PE605.921
- Committee draft report: PE606.233
- Contribution: COM(2016)0881
- Contribution: COM(2016)0881
- Contribution: COM(2016)0881
- Contribution: COM(2016)0881
- Document attached to the procedure: N8-0046/2017
- Document attached to the procedure: OJ C 200 23.06.2017, p. 0014
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2016)0881
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: N8-0046/2017 OJ C 200 23.06.2017, p. 0014
- Committee draft report: PE606.233
- Committee opinion: PE605.921
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE609.652
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2018)755
- Draft final act: 00034/2018/LEX
- Contribution: COM(2016)0881
- Contribution: COM(2016)0881
- Contribution: COM(2016)0881
- Contribution: COM(2016)0881
- Contribution: COM(2016)0881
Votes
A8-0348/2017 - Jeroen Lenaers - Am 44 24/10/2018 13:36:07.000 #
Amendments | Dossier |
221 |
2016/0407(COD)
2017/06/15
AFET
82 amendments...
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Member States should take all necessary measures to return illegally staying third-country nationals in an effective and proportionate manner, in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2008/115/EC and with full respect of fundamental rights and in particular the principle of non-refoulement.
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Member States
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) A
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Alerts on return should be deleted as soon as the Member State or competent authority that issued the return decision in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC has been informed that the return has taken place. Where a return decision is accompanied by an entry ban, the latter should be entered in SIS in accordance with Article 24(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxx [border checks]. In such cases Member States should take all necessary measures to ensure that no time-gap exist between the moment in which the third-country national leaves the
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Alerts on return should be deleted as soon as the Member State or competent authority that issued the return decision in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC has been informed that the return has taken place. Where a return decision is accompanied by an entry ban, the latter should be entered in SIS in accordance with Article 24(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxx [border checks]. In such cases Member States should take all necessary measures to ensure that no time-gap exist between the moment in which the third-country national leaves the
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) This Regulation should establish clear guidance and mandatory rules for the consultation
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Data processed in SIS or transferred through the exchange of supplementary information may provide to the enforcing Member State information that is useful for the rapid identification and re- documentation of illegally staying third- country nationals, in view of their return to a third country. It also significantly reduces the possibility of any of them returning illegally to the Member State some time in the future. In individual cases, it should be possible to share such data and information with a third country for this
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Data processed in SIS or transferred through the exchange of supplementary information may provide to the enforcing Member State information that is useful for the rapid identification and re- documentation of illegally staying third- country nationals, in view of their return to a third country. In individual cases, it should be possible to share such data and information with a third country for this purpose. However, this should only occur after a final decision on return has been taken. Sharing of any personal data should be subject to clear conditions, should be carried out in accordance with the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and be conducted with the agreement of the Member State that issued the alert.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) All measures taken in relation to the SIS should comply with the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Member States should apply guidelines, to be established and monitored jointly by the European Union Agency for Asylum and the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, for a common practice with regard to taking fingerprints and facial images of irregular third- country nationals that complies with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and builds upon the checklist prepared by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Special care and sensitivity should be applied regarding the registration of minors, for example regarding the taking of facial images and finger prints.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) National authorities responsible for return may differ significantly among Member States, and such authorities may also vary within a Member State depending on the reasons for illegal stay. Furthermore, different national lists of "safe third countries" exist. Judicial authorities may also issue return decisions in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC, for instance as result of appeals against a refusal of granting an authorisation or right to stay, or as a criminal sanction. All national authorities in charge of issuing and enforcing return decisions in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC should be entitled to access SIS in order to enter, update, delete and search alerts on return.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Regulation (EU) 2016/794 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement cooperation (Europol Regulation) provides that Europol supports and strengthens actions carried out by the competent authorities of Member States and their cooperation in combating terrorism and serious crime and provides analysis and threat assessments. In order to facilitate Europol in carrying out its tasks, in particular within the European Migrant Smuggling Centre, it is appropriate to allow Europol access to the alert category defined in this Regulation, following consultation with the Member State authorities.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 provides that the host Member State shall authorise the members of the European Border and Coast Guard teams or teams of staff involved in return-related tasks, deployed by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency, to consult European databases, where this consultation is necessary for fulfilling operational aims specified in the operational plan on border checks, border surveillance and return, having previously informed the national authorities. The objective of the deployment of the European Border and Coast Guard teams, teams of staff involved in return-related tasks and the migration management support teams is to provide for technical and operational reinforcement to the requesting Member States, especially to those facing disproportionate migratory challenges. Fulfilling the tasks assigned to the European Border and Coast Guard teams, teams of staff involved in return- related tasks and to the migration
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 a (new) (28a) To facilitate the return of third country nationals, it is recommended that adequate provisions are included in agreements with third countries, for example in form of readmission agreements or other bilateral agreements such as the "Joint way forward" agreement between Afghanistan and the EU.
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 b (new) (28b) Any reform or new provision in the Regulation should not create unnecessary obstacles for Member States who will or are in process of joining the Schengen area.
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The return of third-country nationals who do not fulfil or no longer fulfil the conditions for entry, stay or residence in the Member States
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point a Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The return of third-country nationals who do not fulfil or no longer fulfil the conditions for entry, stay or residence in the Member States, in full respect of fundamental rights and
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Data on third-country nationals subject to a return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC shall be entered in SIS immediately after the decision becomes effective under the national legislation of the respective Member State for the purpose of verifying that the obligation to return has been complied with and for supporting the enforcement of the decision. An alert shall be entered in SIS without delay when the return decision is issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point j (j) whether the person concerned is armed
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point p (p) the category of the person’s current and/or past identification documents;
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point r (r) the number(s) of the person’s current and/or past identification documents;
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 An alert may not be entered without the data referred to in (a),(g),(k),(m),(n),(w) and (
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 A
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) It is necessary to increase the effectiveness of the European system to return illegally staying third-country nationals.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Member States shall provide on a monthly basis statistics to the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of freedom, security and justice established by Regulation (EU) No 1077/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council36 (‘the Agency’) on the number of confirmed returns, on
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Articles 6 and 8, alerts on return shall be
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Articles 6 and 8, alerts on return shall be immediately deleted when the decision upon which the alert was based has been withdrawn or annulled by the competent authority. Alerts on return shall also be deleted when the third-country national concerned can demonstrate that they have left the territory of the Member States in compliance with a return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC.
Amendment 76 #
1. Without prejudice to Articles 6 and 8, alerts on return shall be deleted when the decision upon which the alert was based has been withdrawn or annulled by the competent authority. Alerts on return shall also be deleted when the third-country national concerned can demonstrate that they have left the territory of the Member States in
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 Amendment 78 #
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 Data processed in SIS and the related supplementary information pursuant to this Regulation may not be transferred or made available to a third-country
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) It is necessary to increase the effectiveness of
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 Data processed in SIS and the related supplementary information pursuant to this Regulation may be transferred or made available to a third-country in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 with the authorisation of the issuing Member State, only for the purpose of identification of and issuance of an identification or travel document to an illegally staying-third country national in view of return. However, this shall concern individual cases and only occur after a final decision on return has been taken.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 Data processed in SIS and the related supplementary information pursuant to this Regulation may be transferred or made available to a third-country in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 with the authorisation of the issuing Member State, only for the purpose of identification of and issuance of an identification or travel document to an illegally staying-third country national in view of return and with full respect of the principle of non-refoulement.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 (new) Prior to any transfer of information to a third country, the competent authorities must confirm that the life and freedom of a returnee will not be threatened on account of his race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (new) (1) Data related to any previous asylum application or immigration status of the returnee in territory of the Member States shall not be transferred to a third country for the purpose of this Regulation.
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 2. Europol shall have within their mandate the right to access and search data entered in SIS for the purpose of supporting and strengthening action by the competent authorities of the Member States and their mutual cooperation in preventing and combating migrant entry and smuggling and facilitation of irregular migration in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 30 of Regulation (EU) 2018/ xxx [Border checks].
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Member States should take all necessary measures to return illegally staying third-country nationals in an effective and proportionate manner and ensuring full respect and protection of migrants' human rights, in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2008/115/EC.
source: 606.133
2017/09/06
LIBE
139 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Data on third-country nationals subject to a return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC shall be entered in SIS for the purpose of verifying that the obligation to return has been complied with and for supporting the enforcement of the decision. An alert shall be entered in SIS
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States may refrain from entering an alert if the return decision does not set a deadline for voluntary departure and the third-country national is placed in detention prior to removal.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 2 2. The period for voluntary departure granted to third-country nationals subject to a return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC shall be immediately recorded in the alert.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 3 3. The suspension and the postponement of the enforcement of the return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC shall be immediately recorded in the alert, and a suspension indicator shall be added to the alert. Where a suspension indicator has been added, the alert shall only be accessible to SIRENE bureaux; it shall not be searchable by end-users; and the action called for shall not be enforced.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) any specific, objective, physical characteristics not subject to change, not linked to special categories of personal data defined in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, such as ethnicity, religion, disability, gender or sexual orientation;
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point j Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point j (j) whether the person concerned is armed, violent, has escaped or is involved in an activity as referred to in
Amendment 110 #
(j) whether the person concerned is armed, violent, has escaped or is involved in an activity as referred to in Articles
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point k (k) the reason for the alert and a reference to the decision giving rise to the alert;
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point m Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point n Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point t (t) photographs
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point u (u)
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point u (u)
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point u (u)
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point v Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point v (v) a
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point x a (new) (xa) data referred to in points (a) to (d), (f) to (i), (p) to (s) and (v) of any other identification document(s) carried by the person.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point x a (new) (xa) whether the return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC can be appealed;
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point x b (new) (xb) whether an appeal is pending against the return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 An alert may not be entered without the data referred to in (a),(g),(k),(m),(n) and (w), when such data is available. When available, all other data listed above shall also be entered.
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 An alert may not be entered without the data referred to in (a),(g),(k), (l), (m),(n), (w), (x), (xa) and (
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 Each Member State shall designate a
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Where a third-country national who is the subject of an alert on return is identified when exiting through the external borders of a Member State, the Member State that identified the third-country national concerned shall communicate the
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Where a third-country national
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The issuing Member State shall immediately delete the alert following the receipt of the confirmation of return and only if an entry ban has become active in accordance with Article 24(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxx [Border checks].
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 (new) Where there is no entry ban alert or it has not become active, the alert on return information on third country nationals shall continue to be stored in SIS for a maximum period of five years starting from the time the competent authorities of the Member State issuing the alert on return are informed of the successful return of the person concerned.
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The Member States shall provide on a monthly basis statistics to the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale information
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. CS-SIS shall notify the Member States about their alerts on return for which the period for voluntary departure has expired and for which the period for voluntary departure has not been extended or a residence permit or other authorisation offering a right to stay has been issued to the third-country national concerned.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 1. CS-SIS shall automatically notify the Member States about their alerts on return for which the period for voluntary departure has expired.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Where a third-country national
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Where a third-country national who is subject of an alert on return is identified by a competent authority and it has been ascertained by the same authority that the obligation to return has not been complied with, that authority shall
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 2. Where a third-country national who is subject of an alert on return is identified by a competent authority and it has been ascertained
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The action called for must be carried out in accordance with the EU return acquis and other provisions of national and EU legislation applicable to the individual case, which include: (a) issuing a return decision in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC; (b) passing the third-country national back to the issuing Member State under an existing bilateral agreement or arrangement in accordance with Article 6(3) of Directive 2008/115/EC; or (c) recognising the return decision of the issuing Member State pursuant to Directive 2001/40/EC. In applying this Regulation, the Member States shall prioritise the recognition of the return decision of the issuing Member State pursuant to Directive 2001/40/EC.
Amendment 138 #
1. Where a Member State considers granting a residence permit or other authorisation offering a right to stay to a third-country national who is the subject of an alert on return entered by another Member State, the former shall first consult, through the exchange of supplementary information, the Member State that entered the alert. The Member State that entered the alert shall reply within seven days. If
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. Where a Member State considers granting a residence permit or other authorisation offering a right to stay to a third-country national who is the subject of an alert on return entered by another Member State, the former shall
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 1. Where a Member State considers granting a residence permit or other authorisation offering a right to stay to a third-country national who is the subject of an alert on return entered by another Member State, the former shall first consult, through the exchange of supplementary information, the Member State that entered the alert. The Member State that entered the alert shall reply within seven days. If the Member State considering granting a residence permit or other authorisation offering a right to stay decides to grant it, the alert on return shall be deleted immediately.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 2. Where a Member State considers entering an alert for return concerning a third-country national who is the holder of a valid residence permit or other authorisation offering a right to stay issued by another Member State, it shall inform through the exchange of supplementary information the Member State that issued the permit in order to allow that Member State to decide whether there are reasons justifying its withdrawal. The Member State that issued the permit shall provide a definite reply within seven days. The alert may not be made without the agreement of the Member State that issued the residence permit or authorisation offering a right to stay.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 Amendment 145 #
5. Member States shall provide on an annual basis accurate statistics to the Agency about the consultations carried out in accordance with paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall provide on an annual basis statistics to the Agency about the consultations carried out in accordance with paragraphs 1,
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Articles 6 and 8, alerts on return shall be deleted when the decision upon which the alert was based has been withdrawn or annulled by the competent authority.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Articles 6 and 8, alerts on return shall be deleted
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Articles 6 and 8, alerts on return shall be immediately deleted when the decision upon which the alert was based has been withdrawn or annulled by the competent authority. Alerts on return shall
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Articles 6 and 8, alerts on return shall be deleted when the decision upon which the alert was based has been withdrawn or annulled by the competent authority. Alerts on return shall also be deleted when the third-country national
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Articles 6 and 8, alerts on return shall be deleted when the decision upon which the alert was based has been withdrawn or annulled by the
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Without prejudice to Articles 6 and 8, alerts on return shall be deleted
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Alerts on return shall be deleted automatically as soon as they expire, in accordance with Article 34 of Regulation 2018/xxx [border checks] relating to the consideration period.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Alerts on return shall be deleted where necessary in accordance with the provisions on the compatibility of alerts laid down in Article 23b of Regulation 2018/xxx [border checks].
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. Alerts on return entered in respect of a person who has acquired citizenship of a Member State or of any State whose
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 2. Alerts on return entered in respect of a person who has acquired a residence permit, authorisation offering a right to stay or citizenship of a Member State or of any State whose nationals are beneficiaries of the right of free movement within the Union shall be deleted as soon as the issuing Member State becomes aware, or is informed pursuant to Article 39 of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxx [border checks], that the person in question has acquired such residence permit, other authorisation offering a right to stay or citizenship.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Third-country nationals who are the subject of an alert shall have the right to appeal, and the right to obtain the information which gave rise to the alert in order to assert their right of access to personal data; they shall also have the right to amend and delete the information pertaining to them and to appeal with the necessary guarantees with regard to the principles of protection of individuals and respect for fundamental rights as defined by European and international law, even if they are not on EU territory while the procedure is taking place.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 Data processed in SIS and the related supplementary information pursuant to this Regulation may be transferred or made available to a third
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 Data processed in SIS and the related supplementary information exchanged pursuant to this Regulation may be transferred or made available to a third- country in accordance with Chapter V of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 with the authorisation of the issuing Member State, only if the following cumulative conditions are satisfied: (a) the data is transferred or made available solely for the purpose of identification of and issuance of an
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 Data processed in SIS and the related supplementary information pursuant to this Regulation may not be transferred or made available to a third
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 Without prejudice to the provisions on statistics in Article 54 of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxx [Border checks], the Agency shall produce daily, monthly and annual statistics, both in total number and per each Member State on the number of alerts on return entered in SIS, including on the data referred to in Article 4(x), (xa) and (xb) of this Regulation, on the notifications referred to in Article 7(1) of this Regulation and the number of alerts on return deleted due to compliance with an obligation to return. The Agency shall produce monthly and annual statistics about the data provided by the Member States in accordance with Article 6(3) and Article 8(5) of this Regulation. Those statistics shall not contain personal data.
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. Access to data entered in SIS and the right to search such data shall be reserved to the national authorities referred to in points (a), (b)
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 a (new) Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 As far as not established in this Regulation, the provisions on responsibilities of the Member States and the Agency, the entry
Amendment 30 #
Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Title 1 Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the use of the Schengen Information System for the return of i
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The return of third-country nationals who do not fulfil or no longer fulfil the conditions for entry, stay or residence in the Member States
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) It is necessary to
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) It is necessary to increase the effectiveness of the European system to return i
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) It is
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Member States should take all necessary measures – while fully upholding fundamental rights, and in particular the principle of non- refoulement – to return illegally staying third-country nationals in an effective and proportionate manner, in accordance with the provisions of Directive 2008/115/EC.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Member States should take
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Member States should take all necessary measures to re
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Member States
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) Member States should take all necessary measures to return illegally staying third-country nationals in an effective
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) A Union-wide system for sharing information between Member States on return decisions issued in respect of third- country nationals staying illegally on the territory of the Member States in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) A Union-wide system for sharing information between Member States on
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) A Union-wide system for sharing information between Member States on return decisions issued in respect of third- country nationals staying i
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) SIS alerts on return and the exchange of supplementary information on these alerts should support competent authorities to take the necessary measures to enforce return decisions issued in accordance with provisions respecting
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) SIS alerts on return
Amendment 47 #
(7)
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) To ensure the effectiveness of return and increase the added value of alerts on return, Member States should enter alerts in SIS in relation to
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) To ensure the effectiveness of return and increase the added value of alerts on return, Member States should enter alerts in SIS in relation to all final return decisions they issue to i
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) This Regulation should set out common rules for entering alerts related to return in SIS as soon as the underlying return decisions in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC are issued. The alert should indicate whether a period for voluntary departure has been granted to the third-
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8a) Where enforcement of a return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC is suspended or postponed, the issuing Member State should mark the alert on return with a suspension indicator to ensure that it is only accessible to SIRENE bureaux, that it is not searchable by end-users, and that the action called for is not enforced.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) It is necessary to specify the categories of data that can be entered in
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) It is necessary to specify the categories of data that can be entered in SIS in respect of third-country nationals who are the subject of a return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC. Alerts on return should contain only those data that are required in order to identify the data subjects, to allow the competent
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) It is necessary to specify the categories of data that can be entered in SIS in respect of third-country nationals who are the subject of a return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC. Alerts
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) Competent authorities should be able to add in the SIS specific information relating to any specific, objective, physical characteristics of a person not subject to change. This information may relate to characteristics such as piercings, tattoos, marks, scars, etc. However, it should not reveal sensitive data of a person such as ethnicity, religion, disability, gender or sexual orientation, as defined in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a. _______________ 1a Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).
Amendment 57 #
(10) Each Member State should designate an authority responsible for the exchange of supplementary information in connection to alerts on return in order to ensure
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) Each Member State should designate a
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Procedures should be established to enable Member States to verify th
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Procedures should be established to enable Member States to verify that the obligation to return has been complied with and to confirm the departure of or that a residence permit or other authorisation offering a right to stay has been granted to the third-
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11a) Where a third-country national who is subject of an alert on return is identified by a competent authority and it has been ascertained by the same authority that the obligation to return has not been complied with, that authority should immediately consult the issuing Member State through the exchange of supplementary information in order to determine the action to be taken. That action should be carried out in accordance with the EU return acquis and other provisions of national and EU legislation applicable to the case concerned. The Member States should nevertheless prioritise the recognition of the return decision of the issuing Member State pursuant to Directive 2001/40/EC.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 b (new) (11b) Entering information on voluntary departure deadlines into the SIS should allow illegally staying third-country nationals, when checked, to say why they should be allowed to remain in a Member State.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Alerts on return should be automatically deleted as soon as the alert expires, in accordance with the examination procedure. They should also be deleted as soon as the Member State or competent authority that issued the return decision in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC has been informed that the return has taken place
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) Alerts on return should be deleted as soon as the Member State or competent authority that issued the return decision in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC has been informed that the return has taken place or that a residence permit or other authorisation offering a right to stay has been granted. Where a return decision is accompanied by an entry ban, the latter should be entered in SIS in accordance with Article 24(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxx [border checks]. In such cases Member States should take all necessary measures to ensure that no time-gap exist between the moment in
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12)
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) Where a return decision is accompanied by an entry ban, the latter should be entered in the SIS in accordance with Article 24(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxx [border checks].In such cases, Member States must take all necessary measures to ensure that there is no delay between the time the third-country national leaves the Schengen area and the time the alert on the entry ban is activated in the SIS.
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 a (new) (12a) When a return decision is accompanied by an entry ban, even if the alert on return is not entered in SIS the activation of the alert on the entry ban should follow immediately after the return has taken place.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) SIS should contain a mechanism for notifying the Member States about the non- compliance of third-country nationals with an obligation to return within a given period of voluntary departure. The mechanism should support the Member States in fulfilling their obligations in accordance with Article 8(1) and Article 11 of Directive 2008/115/EC with regard to third-country nationals who have not complied with an obligation to return.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15)
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Alerts should be kept in SIS only for the time required to fulfil the purposes for which they were entered. In accordance with Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxx [border checks] the review period for alerts on the return of third- country nationals is five years.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Alerts should be kept in SIS only for the time required to fulfil the purposes for which they were entered. In accordance with Article 34 of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxx [border checks] the review
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Data processed in SIS or transferred through the exchange of supplementary information may provide to the enforcing Member State information that is useful for the rapid identification and re- documentation of illegally staying third- country nationals, in view of their return to a third country.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Data processed in SIS or transferred through the exchange of supplementary information may provide to the enforcing
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Data processed in SIS or transferred through the exchange of supplementary information may provide to the enforcing Member State information that is useful for the rapid identification and re- documentation of illegally staying third- country nationals, in view of their return to a third country.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) All sharing and re-use of data must be strictly supervised and limited to only what is specifically necessary.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) National authorities responsible for return may differ significantly among Member States, and such authorities may also vary within a Member State depending on the reasons for illegal stay. Judicial authorities may also issue return decisions in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC, for instance as result of appeals against a refusal of granting an authorisation or right to stay, or as a criminal sanction. All national authorities in charge of issuing and enforcing return decisions in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC should be entitled to access SIS in order to enter, update, delete and search alerts on return, in conditions that are strictly defined depending on the authorities concerned.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) National authorities responsible for return may differ significantly among Member States, and such authorities may also vary within a Member State depending on the reasons for illegal stay. Judicial authorities may also issue return decisions in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC, for instance as result of appeals against a refusal of granting an authorisation or right to stay, or as a criminal sanction. All national authorities in charge of issuing and enforcing return decisions in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC should be entitled to access SIS in order to
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) National authorities responsible for return may differ significantly among Member States, and such authorities may also vary within a Member State depending on the reasons for i
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) National authorities responsible for return may differ significantly among Member States, and such authorities may also vary within a Member State depending on the reasons for illegal stay. Judicial authorities may also issue return decisions in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC, for instance as result of appeals against a refusal of granting an authorisation or right to stay, or as a criminal sanction. All national authorities in charge of issuing and enforcing return decisions in accordance with Directive 2008/115/EC should be entitled to access SIS in order to
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 a (new) (17a) The Member States are to designate the persons strictly entitled by the authorities to request information on the data recorded in the SIS. This access and entitlement must be subject to verification by an independent authority.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) Access to alerts on return should be granted to national authorities referred to in points (a), (b)
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Regulation (EU) 2016/1624 provides that the host Member State shall authorise the members of the European Border and Coast Guard teams or teams of staff involved in return-related tasks, deployed by the European Border and Coast Gard Agency, to consult European databases, where this consultation is necessary for fulfilling operational aims specified in the operational plan on border checks, border surveillance and return. The objective of the deployment of the European Border and Coast Guard teams, teams of staff involved in return-related tasks and the migration management support teams is to provide for technical and operational reinforcement to the requesting Member States
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) ‘return decision’ means a return decision as defined in Article 3(4) of Directive 2008/115/EC once, if requested, any appeal with suspensive effect has been exhausted in accordance with Article 13(1) of that Directive or the time period for lodging such appeal has expired, and any period for voluntary departure has passed in accordance with Article 7(1) of that Directive;
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) ‘return decision’ means a return decision as defined in Article 3(4) of Directive 2008/115/EC and in respect of which all possible avenues of appeal have been exhausted or declared inadmissible;
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) ‘return decision
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) ‘return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC’ means a return decision within the meaning of point (c) and an administrative or judicial decision or act, stating or declaring the stay of a third-country national to be illegal and imposing or stating an obligation to return, issued under the conditions of Article 2(2)(b) of Directive 2008/115/EC;
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) ‘return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC’ means a return decision within the meaning of point (c) and an administrative or judicial decision or act, stating or declaring the stay of a third-country national to be i
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) ‘entry ban’ means any administrative or judicial decision or act prohibiting entry into and stay on the territory of Member States for a fixed period.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) (db) ‘illegal stay’ means an illegal stay as defined in point 3 of Article 3 of Directive 2008/115/EC;
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point d c (new) (dc) ‘removal’ means removal as defined in point 5 of Article 3 of Directive 2008/115/EC;
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) ‘suspension indicator’ means a marker that an issuing Member State may add to an alert on return where enforcement of a return decision is suspended or postponed.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Data on third-country nationals subject to a return decision issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC shall be entered immediately in SIS for the purpose of verifying that the obligation to return has been complied with and for supporting the enforcement of the decision. An alert shall be entered in SIS without delay when the return decision is issued in accordance with provisions respecting Directive 2008/115/EC, and in accordance with the provisions on the compatibility of alerts laid down in Article 23b of Regulation (EU) 2018/xxx.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 1. Data on third-country nationals subject to a return decision issued in
source: 609.652
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/7/docs |
|
links/Research document/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2017)599342New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2017)599342 |
committees/0/shadows/3 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/1 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/2/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE606.233New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-PR-606233_EN.html |
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE605.921&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AD-605921_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE609.652New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/LIBE-AM-609652_EN.html |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
/oeil/spdoc.do?i=30405&j=0&l=en
|
docs/5 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/1 |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/5/docs |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0/title |
Old
Joint Declaration 2018New
Joint Declaration 2018-19 |
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/4/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2017-0348&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0348_EN.html |
events/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0414New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0414_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links/Research document |
|
other |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150New
Rules of Procedure EP 159 |
procedure/Notes |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
LIBE/8/08852New
|
procedure/final |
|
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stageNew
Procedure completed |
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage |
activities/2 |
|
activities/3 |
|
procedure/Modified legal basis |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
|
activities/0/commission/0 |
|
other/0 |
|
procedure/summary/0 |
See also
|
activities/1/committees/0/date |
2017-05-15T00:00:00
|
activities/1/committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/date |
2017-05-15T00:00:00
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
activities/1 |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
LIBE/8/08852
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/3/shadows |
|
committees/3/date |
2017-03-09T00:00:00
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016PC0881:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52016PC0881:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|