BETA

6 Amendments of Daniel DALTON related to 2016/2908(RSP)

Amendment 65 #

Paragraph 19
19. Calls, in the interests of consumer and environmental protection, for the swift adoption of the proposal for a Regulation on the approval and market surveillance of motor vehicles and their trailers (2016/0014(COD)), replacing the current framework directive on type- approval; considers the preservation of the level of ambition of the original Commission proposal, in particular as regards the introduction of EU oversight of the system, to be the bare minimum objective to be achief what is required to improve the EU system; considers that a more comprehensive and coordinated system of type approval and market surveillance, involving EU oversight, peer review and cooperation with and between national authorities should be the objectived during the interinstitutional negotiations on the dossier;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 73 #

Paragraph 20
20. Calls for a drastic strengthening of market surveillance in the new EU type- approval framework, on the basis of clearly defined rules and a clearer distribution of responsibilities; between national authorities clearly obligated to undertake significant market surveillance in their own territory, and EU market surveillance to identify weaknesses in the national systems;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 86 #

Paragraph 23
23. Draws attention to the US type- approval system – whereby fees collected from manufacturers to cover the cost of certification and compliance programmes are sent to the US Treasury, and the US Congress in turn allocates funds to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to implement its programmes – as a paradigm that may be useful for improving the independence of the EU system;deleted
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 94 #

Paragraph 24
24. Points out the need for systematic enforcement of conformity of production and in-use conformity of vehicles by the national authorities responsible, further coordinated and supervised at EU level; urges the Member States to clarify once and for all which authority is in charge of market surveillance in their territory and to notify the Commission accordingly; believes that much closer cooperation and information sharing between Member States' market surveillance authorities and the Commission, including on national market surveillance plans, will enhance the overall quality of market surveillance in the EU and enable the Commission to identify weaknesses in national market surveillance systems;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 104 #

Paragraph 26 a (new)
26a. Believes that greater coordination and discussion between type approval authorities and the European Commission, in the form of a Forum chaired by the Commission, will contribute to the promotion of good practices aimed at ensuring effective and harmonised implementation of the type approval and market surveillance regulation;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 132 #

Paragraph 31 a (new)
31a. Believes that the resources levied by these fines should be held by the Member States for purposes of redress to persons negatively affected by the infringement and other such activities to the benefit of consumers or, where appropriate, environmental protection within the Member States;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS