Activities of Rovana PLUMB related to 2021/0419(COD)
Plenary speeches (2)
Intelligent Road Transport Systems (debate)
Intelligent Road Transport Systems (debate)
Reports (1)
REPORT on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 2010/40/EU on the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other modes of transport
Amendments (12)
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 3 a (new)
Recital 3 a (new)
(3a) The Regulation (EU) 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, or taxonomy regulation expresses the ambition to facilitate more investment for sustainable mobility, for example to increase electrification or to support the transition to cleaner modes of transport by promoting modal shift and better traffic management in its recital 49. At the same time it recognises the need for additional technical screening criteria for transport. To ease investment in ITS and to reflect its importance for sustainable mobility, a technical screening criteria for ITS should be considered.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 7
Recital 7
(7) In the context of the implementation of Commission Delegated Regulations39 supplementing Directive 2010/40/EU, Member States have established national access points40 (NAPs). The NAPs organise the access to and reuse of transport related data to help support the provision of EU-wide interoperable travel and traffic ITS services to end users. These NAPs are an important component of the common European mobility data space under the European strategy for data41 and should be relied upon in particular as regards the accessibility of metadata and data. __________________ 39 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 885/2013 of 15 May 2013 supplementing ITS Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the provision of information services for safe and secure parking places for trucks and commercial vehicles (OJ L 247, 18.9.2013, p. 1); Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 886/2013 of 15 May 2013 supplementing Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to data and procedures for the provision, where possible, of road safety-related minimum universal traffic information free of charge to users (OJ L 247, 18.9.2013, p. 6); Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/962 of 18 December 2014 supplementing Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the provision of EU-wide real-time traffic information services (OJ L 157, 23.6.2015, p. 21); and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1926 of 31 May 2017 supplementing Directive 2010/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the provision of EU-wide multimodal travel information services (OJ L 272, 21.10.2017, p. 1). 40 https://transport.ec.europa.eu/transport- themes/intelligent-transport- systems/road/action-plan-and- directive/national-access-points_en 41 COM(2020) 66 final0066.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8
Recital 8
(8) To ensure a coordinated and, effective and interoperable deployment of ITS within the Union as a whole, specifications including, where appropriate, standards, laying down further detailed provisions and procedures should be introduced, in addition to already adopted specifications. Before adopting any additional or revised specifications, the Commission should assess their compliance with certain defined principles set out in Annex II. Priority should be given in the first instance to the four main areas of ITS development and deployment. During further implementation of ITS the existing ITS infrastructure deployed by a particular Member State should be taken into account in terms of technological progress and financial efforts made. If appropriate, it should be ensured, in particular for C-ITS, that requirements for ITS systems neither impose nor discriminate in favour of the use of a particular type of technology.
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 a (new)
Recital 8 a (new)
(8a) Directive (EU) 2018/1972 in its recital 114 clarifies that technology neutrality has to be seen as an efficient means to achieve a goal, it does not constitute a goal in itself. In the context of this Directive it has to be seen as contributing to the goal of road safety: in the context of the ongoing C-ITS deployment; other radio systems on Europe’s roads such as road charging or the smart tachograph and the principles in Annex II.
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 8 b (new)
Recital 8 b (new)
(8b) Be technology neutral – restrictions to the principle of technology neutrality should be appropriate and justified by the need to avoid harmful interference, for example by imposing emission masks and power levels, to ensure the protection of public health by limiting public exposure to electromagnetic fields, to ensure the proper functioning of services through an adequate level of technical quality of service, while not necessarily precluding the possibility of using more than one service in the same radio spectrum band, to ensure proper sharing of radio spectrum, in particular where its use is subject only to general authorisations, to safeguard the efficient use of radio spectrum, or to fulfil a general interest objective in accordance with Union law.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a directive
Recital 21
Recital 21
(21) The provision of secured and reliable timing and positioning services is an essential element of the effective operation of ITS applications and services. Therefore, it is appropriate to ensure their backward compatibility with the authentication mechanism provided by the Galileo programme, in order to mitigate Global Navigation Satellite Systems (‘GNSS’) signal spoofing attacks.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point -a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 3 – point -a (new)
Directive 2010/40/EU
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2
Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point 2
(-a) point (2) is replaced by the following: ‘(2) ‘ ()‘interoperability’ means the capacity of systems and the underlying business processes to exchange data and share information and knowledge not only at service-level but at technical level too, to guarantee the continuity of ITS services;’;
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2010/40/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 1
Article 5 – paragraph 1
1. Member States shall take the necessary measures to ensure that the specifications adopted by the Commission in accordance with Article 6 are applied to ITS applications and services, where those are deployed, in accordance with the principles in Annex II. This is without prejudice to the right of each Member State to decide on its deployment of such applications and services on its territory. This right is without prejudice to Articles 6a and 6b. Where relevant, Member States shall also cooperate, including with relevant stakeholders, on the enforcement of those specifications. The Commission shall adopt a methodology for the harmonisation of National Access Points’ architecture as part of its working program referred to in Article 17(5).
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2010/40/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Article 5 – paragraph 2
2. Member States shall also cooperate, including with relevant stakeholders, in respect of the priority areas, insofar as no specifications have been adopted with regard to those priority areas.
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4
Directive 2010/40/EC
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Member States shall also cooperate, where necessary, including with relevant stakeholders, on operational aspects of the implementation of and compliance with the specifications adopted by the Commission, such as standards and EU harmonised profiles, common definitions, common metadata, common quality requirements and aspects related to the interoperability of National Access Points’ architectures, common data exchange conditions, as well as common training and outreach activities.’;
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)
Directive 2010/40/EC
Article 9
Article 9
(9a) Article 9 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 9 Non-binding measures The Commission mayshall adopt guidelines and other non-binding measures to facilitate Member States’ cooperation relating to the priority areas in accordance with the advisory procedure referred to in Article 15(2). These guidelines shall define and establish a process by which Member States will share the data types listed in Annex III, which have been made available by ITS service providers, between each other through their NAPs in a centralised and cooperative manner.’; Or. en (Directive 2010/40/EC)
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – point 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3.1 – paragraph 1 – point 3.1.3 a (new)
Annex I – point 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3.1 – paragraph 1 – point 3.1.3 a (new)
Directive 2010/40/EC
Annex I – point 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3.1 – paragraph 1 – point 3.1.3 a (new)
Annex I – point 3 – paragraph 1 – point 3.1 – paragraph 1 – point 3.1.3 a (new)
3.1.3a. Ensure rapid adaptation of Regulation (EU) 2018/858, to include Next Generation eCall technologies.