BETA

17 Amendments of Vladimir URUTCHEV related to 2012/2017(DEC)

Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
3. Recalls that the Accession Treaties of Bulgaria, Slovakia and Lithuania included provisions regarding the early closure of eight nuclear reactors, due to their low safety standards;
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. Recalls that the Union committed itself to contributing financially to the decommissioning of the three nuclear power plants concerned, without clearly defining the overall amounts to be allocated and to support the mitigation of the energy supply, social and economic consequences in the three countries;
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
7. Remains concerned, however, that the shut-down of reactors is, in some cases, not yet irreversible;deleted
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11
11. QuestionNotes the fact that of this amount 60 % went to decommissioning and 40 % to mitigation measures;
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Takes note with concern that the plant management and its specialised personnel have had limited influence on priority setting and allocation of available resources; consequently funds were used for energy efficiency purposes to the detriment of the decommissioning ones;deleted
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
14. Is concerned by the lack of coherence between the priorities set out in the accession treaties and the set of key objectives to be accomplished, accompanied by their respective amounts;deleted
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
15. Is concernedNotes that the existing decommissioning plan focuses omainly on the first phase of decommissioning, which almost exclusively covers non-radioactive material;
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
19. Is deeply concerned by the current lack of comprehensive decommissioning expertise in the EU and possible deficiency inof viable knowledge on the estimation of the financial amounts necessary to complete the whole decommissioning process;
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
20. Demands, therefore, where this is not yet done, the immediate completion of all decommissioning activities interlinked with creating an accurate cost estimate of the decommissioning process in its entirety; applying the latest methodology recommended by the Commission for decommissioning costing,
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Acknowledges that considerable amounts are still needed in this process and deplores the factmands that Member States have failed to set up the necessaryadjust the existing mechanisms or set up new mechanisms to ensure this additional funding to that provided by the EU;
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
22. Notes that considerable sums of money had been used on operational costs; regrets a situation where the money spent on operational costs of the nuclear power plants could actually representpayments to plant personnel needed to maintain the safety of the nuclear units during the decommissioning process; regrets a situation where the money spent on plant personnel could be thought by some as an incentive to keep the nuclear power plants running;
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
23. Finds it unacceptable that, more than ten years after the start of the decommissioning funding, none of three nuclear power plants concerned are in an irreversible operation condition;deleted
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
24. Regrets that this situation could be used as political leverage by the Member State to obtain additional funding;deleted
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 40
40. Recalls that only national nuclear regulatory authorities can obtainissue decommissioning licences to legal persons in strict compliance with the corresponding national legislation;
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 41
41. Asks, if not yet done, for a clear, unequivocal deadline for acquiring the decommissioning licences to be set;
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 46
46. Is of the firm opinion that the Union’s financial assistance must expire at the end of next programming period, i.e. in 2017 and 2020 respectively; the three Member States concerned must therefore set-up the appropriate mechanismNotes that according to the proposal for the Council regulation (COM (2011)0783) the Union’s financial assistance will continue over the next programming period, i.e. 2014-2020 ; is of the firm opinion that before the end of this period, the Commission shall evaluate the progress achieved in decommissioning of the plants and the remaining activities with the view of changing the amount of EU financial assistance to the three Member States concerned, taking due account of the possibilities for further self financing of decommissioning, established within the frame of mechanisms set up in the Member States to ensure additional funding;
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 47
47. Insists that the ex-ante conditionality, as set out in Article 4 of the proposed Council Regulation must be adhered to; in the event of non-compliance, funding should be suspendedall or part of the funding may be suspended if there is a reasoned opinion by the Commission in respect of an infringement under the corresponding Article of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
2012/05/09
Committee: CONT