Activities of Victor BOŞTINARU related to 2012/2308(INI)
Shadow opinions (1)
OPINION on the location of the seats of the European Union’s Institutions
Amendments (4)
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph C
Paragraph C
C. whereas since 2006 attempts by the Petitions Committee to consider this issue on a parliamentary level have repeatedly been obstructed despite the widespreadsome MEPs have taken a serious interest in the issue amongst MEPs;
Amendment 64 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
Paragraph 1
1. WelcomNotes the decision by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs to draw up a report on the location of the seats of the European Union’s institutions;
Amendment 84 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Agrees with the principle that the European Parliament would be more effective, cost-efficient and respectful of the environment if it were located in a single placeRecognises that the regular journeys to Strasbourg are liable to engender additional costs; and notes that the continuation of the monthly migrationse journeys between Brussels and Strasbourg has become a symbolic negative issue amongst most EU citizens which is detrimental to Parliament’s reputationis a topic of debate within the European Parliament;
Amendment 115 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Respects the historic reasons for the location of its plenary sessions in Strasbourg and the Treaty requirements that necessitate the two-seat system; nevertheless insists that such an arrangement cannot continue in perpetuity and that Parliament itself must be ableremains convinced that the European Parliament should be able, if it deems this necessary, to state aits preference for its futureas to the future of this system;