BETA


2012/2308(INI) Location of the seats of the European Union's institutions

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead AFCO HÄFNER Gerald (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), FOX Ashley (icon: ECR ECR) LE GRIP Constance (icon: PPE PPE), DROUTSAS Dimitrios (icon: S&D S&D), ILCHEV Stanimir (icon: ALDE ALDE), SØNDERGAARD Søren Bo (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), MESSERSCHMIDT Morten (icon: EFD EFD)
Committee Opinion BUDG PICKART ALVARO Alexander Nuno (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion PETI CHICHESTER Giles (icon: ECR ECR) Victor BOŞTINARU (icon: S&D S&D), Jarosław WAŁĘSA (icon: PPE PPE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 052

Events

2013/11/20
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2013/11/20
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 483 votes to 141, with 34 abstentions, a resolution on the location of the seats of the European Union’s Institutions.

It recalled that Article 341 TFEU establishes that the seats of the institutions of the Union shall be determined by common accord of the governments of the Member States and that the European Parliament, given that it is the only body directly representing the European citizens, should be granted the prerogative of determining its own working arrangements, including the right to decide where and when it holds its meetings .

The current situation is that, in accordance with Article 341 TFEU, Member States have determined the seat of the institutions: Protocol 6 annexed to the Treaties establishes that Parliament shall have its seat in Strasbourg, where 12 periods of monthly plenary sessions – including the budget session – shall be held, that the periods of additional plenary sessions shall be held in Brussels, that its committees shall meet in Brussels, and that its General Secretariat and its departments shall remain in Luxembourg.

It also recalled that the EU citizens (more than one million have endorsed the ‘One Seat campaign’ petition) are continuing to express their discontentment with the current situation.

Parliament agreed with the principle that the European Parliament would be more effective, cost-efficient and respectful of the environment if it were located in a single place. It noted that the continuation of the monthly migration between Brussels and Strasbourg has amongst most EU citizens become a symbolic, negative issue detrimental to the European Union’s reputation, especially at a time when the financial crisis has led to serious and painful expenditure cuts in the Member States.

It noted also that the additional annual costs resulting from the geographic dispersion of Parliament have been estimated to range between EUR 156 million and EUR 204 million, equivalent to approximately 10 % of Parliament’s annual budget, while the environmental impact is also significant, with the CO2 emissions associated with the transfers to and from the three working locations estimated to be between 11 000 and 19 000 tonnes.

Treaty revision procedure : Parliament considered it perfectly legitimate to launch a debate on its right to determine its own working arrangements, including the right to decide where and when it is to meet. Accordingly, it committed themselves to initiating an ordinary treaty revision procedure under Article 48 TEU with a view to proposing the changes to Article 341 TFEU and Protocol 6 necessary to allow Parliament to decide on the location of its seat and its internal organisation .

It stated that it shall not make any recommendations regarding the seats of the other EU institutions.

Parliament asked the Court of Auditors, or a similar independent agency, to provide a comprehensive analysis of the potential savings for the EU budget if Parliament had Brussels as its only seat. This analysis should include budgetary aspects and ancillary costs such as savings made through reduced loss of working time and greater efficiency. Furthermore, it asked the Bureau to commission Eurobarometer, or a similar professional polling service, to conduct, by 1 January 2014, a survey of the European citizens’ views on the prospect of maintaining Parliament’s three places of work, with specific reference to the financial, environmental and efficiency costs of this arrangement.

Unresolved questions : in addition to the issue of the location of seats, there are other essential matters directly related to Parliament’s status and its function within the EU institutional machinery, and – on those points – convincing solutions have yet to be found . These issues pertain to:

electoral law, rules for a no-protest zone, immunity matters, points related to the Statute for Members.

According to the Parliament, attending to these should either be encompassed within Parliament’s right of organisational self-determination, exercised in the form of a general decision-making power, or, at the very least, be brought within the scope of the ordinary legislative procedure based on codecision.

Lastly, the resolution acknowledged that any future decision by Parliament on its working arrangements must allow sufficient time for debate and reflection, as well as for an orderly transition.

Documents
2013/11/20
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2013/11/19
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2013/10/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Details

The Committee on Constitutional Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Ashley FOX (ECR, UK) and Gerald HAFNER (Greens/EFA, DE) on the location of the seats of the European Union’s Institutions.

It believed that the European Parliament, given that it is the only body directly representing the European citizens, should be granted the prerogative of determining its own working arrangements, including the right to decide where and when it holds its meetings . The current situation is that, in accordance with Article 341 TFEU, Member States have determined the seat of the institutions: Protocol 6 annexed to the Treaties establishes that Parliament shall have its seat in Strasbourg, where 12 periods of monthly plenary sessions – including the budget session – shall be held, that the periods of additional plenary sessions shall be held in Brussels, that its committees shall meet in Brussels, and that its General Secretariat and its departments shall remain in Luxembourg.

The committee agreed with the principle that the European Parliament would be more effective, cost-efficient and respectful of the environment if it were located in a single place. Members note that the continuation of the monthly migration between Brussels and Strasbourg has amongst most EU citizens become a symbolic, negative issue detrimental to the European Union’s reputation, especially at a time when the financial crisis has led to serious and painful expenditure cuts in the Member States.

The report noted that the additional annual costs resulting from the geographic dispersion of Parliament have been estimated to range between EUR 156 million and EUR 204 million, equivalent to approximately 10 % of Parliament’s annual budget, while the environmental impact is also significant, with the CO2 emissions associated with the transfers to and from the three working locations estimated to be between 11 000 and 19 000 tonnes.

Treaty revision procedure : Members considered it perfectly legitimate to launch a debate on its right to determine its own working arrangements, including the right to decide where and when it is to meet. Accordingly, they committed themselves to initiating an ordinary treaty revision procedure under Article 48 TEU with a view to proposing the changes to Article 341 TFEU and Protocol 6 necessary to allow Parliament to decide on the location of its seat and its internal organisation .

They also called on the Parliament not to make any recommendations regarding the seats of the other EU institutions.

The committee asked the Court of Auditors, or a similar independent agency, to provide a comprehensive analysis of the potential savings for the EU budget if Parliament had Brussels as its only seat. This analysis should include budgetary aspects and ancillary costs such as savings made through reduced loss of working time and greater efficiency. Furthermore, the committee asked the Bureau to commission Eurobarometer, or a similar professional polling service, to conduct, by 1 January 2014, a survey of the European citizens’ views on the prospect of maintaining Parliament’s three places of work, with specific reference to the financial, environmental and efficiency costs of this arrangement.

Lastly, Members acknowledged that any future decision by Parliament on its working arrangements must allow sufficient time for debate and reflection, as well as for an orderly transition.

Documents
2013/10/14
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
2013/09/27
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2013/09/26
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/09/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2013/07/05
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2013/06/06
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2013/03/26
   EP - PICKART ALVARO Alexander Nuno (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in BUDG
2013/02/18
   EP - HÄFNER Gerald (Verts/ALE) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO
2013/02/18
   EP - FOX Ashley (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in AFCO
2013/01/22
   EP - CHICHESTER Giles (ECR) appointed as rapporteur in PETI
2012/11/22
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading

Documents

Activities

Votes

A7-0350/2013 - Ashley Fox et Gerald Häfner - § 1/2

2013/11/20 Outcome: +: 648, -: 22, 0: 4
DE FR IT GB PL ES RO BE HU PT CZ SE BG EL AT NL IE FI HR SK LT LV DK EE SI MT CY LU
Total
86
68
59
65
46
43
28
21
20
20
19
18
17
17
18
22
12
12
12
13
11
9
11
6
6
5
4
5
icon: PPE PPE
241

Czechia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
170

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
78

Greece ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
52

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
52

Italy ECR

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFD EFD
22

France EFD

Against (1)

1
4

Greece EFD

1

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
27

France NI

2

Italy NI

2

Spain NI

1
2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

A7-0350/2013 - Ashley Fox et Gerald Häfner - § 2/2

2013/11/20 Outcome: +: 576, -: 90, 0: 9
DE IT GB PL NL HU BE PT ES SE AT CZ EL RO BG IE FI LT DK SK LV HR SI MT EE CY LU FR
Total
85
59
65
44
22
21
20
19
46
18
17
19
18
28
17
12
12
11
11
13
9
12
7
5
6
4
6
68
icon: S&D S&D
174

Netherlands S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

Against (1)

4

Ireland S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
239

Czechia PPE

Against (1)

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

3

Malta PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
77

Austria ALDE

1

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
52

Italy ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
52

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
26

Italy NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

5

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: EFD EFD
23
4

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

France EFD

Against (1)

1

A7-0350/2013 - Ashley Fox et Gerald Häfner - § 4

2013/11/20 Outcome: +: 506, -: 146, 0: 19
GB IT DE PL SE BE RO AT CZ PT NL HU DK FI ES LT BG LV EL SK MT EE CY IE SI HR LU FR
Total
63
60
86
46
19
21
28
18
18
19
22
19
11
11
44
11
15
9
17
13
5
6
4
12
7
12
6
68
icon: S&D S&D
172

Netherlands S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

4

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Ireland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
78

Austria ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Greece ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
51

Italy ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
52

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

1
icon: PPE PPE
237

Belgium PPE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5

Czechia PPE

Against (1)

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Slovenia PPE

Against (2)

3

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: EFD EFD
23
4

Netherlands EFD

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Greece EFD

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

France EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
27

Italy NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1
2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Spain NI

1

Bulgaria NI

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

A7-0350/2013 - Ashley Fox et Gerald Häfner - § 5

2013/11/20 Outcome: +: 635, -: 35, 0: 8
DE IT GB ES PL FR RO BE HU NL SE CZ PT EL AT BG IE FI HR SK LT DK LV SI EE MT CY LU
Total
86
59
65
46
46
66
28
21
21
22
19
19
20
16
18
17
12
12
12
13
11
11
9
7
6
5
4
6
icon: PPE PPE
241

Czechia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3
icon: S&D S&D
173

Netherlands S&D

2

Bulgaria S&D

4

Ireland S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
79

Greece ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
52

Italy ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
51

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
31

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Greece GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
27

Italy NI

2

Spain NI

1

France NI

2
2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Bulgaria NI

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1
icon: EFD EFD
23
4

France EFD

Against (1)

1

Netherlands EFD

Against (1)

1

Greece EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Denmark EFD

1

A7-0350/2013 - Ashley Fox et Gerald Häfner - § 8/2

2013/11/20 Outcome: +: 453, -: 200, 0: 15
GB IT NL BE SE PL PT AT DE FI CZ DK ES LV IE EL LT EE RO HR CY BG SI SK MT LU HU FR
Total
65
60
22
21
19
45
19
18
85
12
18
11
43
9
12
17
10
6
28
12
4
17
7
13
5
6
17
66
icon: S&D S&D
169

Netherlands S&D

2

Finland S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Ireland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

1

Bulgaria S&D

4

Slovenia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Hungary S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
79

Austria ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Greece ALDE

1

Lithuania ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Slovenia ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
52

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
50

Italy ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
30

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

1

Spain GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Latvia GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Croatia GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
27

Italy NI

2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1
2

Bulgaria NI

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

France NI

2
icon: EFD EFD
23
4

Netherlands EFD

For (1)

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Denmark EFD

1

Greece EFD

1

Lithuania EFD

2

Slovakia EFD

For (1)

1

France EFD

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
237

Czechia PPE

2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

3

Malta PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

A7-0350/2013 - Ashley Fox et Gerald Häfner - § 9/2

2013/11/20 Outcome: +: 520, -: 115, 0: 38
DE GB IT PL RO BE HU SE CZ PT ES BG EL FI AT IE LT DK SK LV HR SI MT EE NL CY LU FR
Total
84
65
60
45
28
21
20
19
19
20
45
17
17
12
18
12
10
11
13
8
12
7
5
6
22
4
6
66
icon: S&D S&D
169

Bulgaria S&D

Against (1)

4

Finland S&D

2

Ireland S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
240

Czechia PPE

2

Ireland PPE

Against (1)

4

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

3

Malta PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
79

Greece ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Abstain (1)

4

Lithuania ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovakia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

Against (1)

3

Luxembourg ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
52

Italy ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Belgium ECR

For (1)

1

Hungary ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Denmark ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
52

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Portugal Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Spain Verts/ALE

1

Greece Verts/ALE

1

Finland Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
27

Italy NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2
2

Belgium NI

For (1)

1

Spain NI

1

Bulgaria NI

1

Ireland NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2
icon: EFD EFD
23
4

Greece EFD

1

Finland EFD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFD

2