7 Amendments of Frédérique RIES related to 2020/2012(INL)
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Recital C a (new)
Recital C a (new)
Ca. Whereas AI solutions can contribute to reduction of the current environmental footprint of the ICT sector which is estimated at more than 2% of all global emissions; whereas the European digital strategy proposes green transformation measures for digital sectors;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Recital C b (new)
Recital C b (new)
Cb. Whereas the development of artificial intelligence, robotics, automated decisions, machine learning, and related technologies are a critical enabler for attaining the goals of the Green Deal and to reach the sustainability goals of the Green Deal in many different sectors; whereas digital technologies can boost the impact of policies in delivering environmental protection;
Amendment 67 #
Amendment 113 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 a (new)
5a. Strongly supports the creation of a European Health Data Space1a proposed by the Commission which aims at promoting health-data exchange and at supporting research in full respect of data protection, including processing data with AI technology, and which strengthens and extends the use and re-use of health data; encourages the upscaling of cross-border exchange of health data, their link and use through secure, federated repositories, specific kinds of health information, such as European Health Records (EHRs), genomic information, and digital health images to facilitate Union-wide interoperable registers or databases in areas such as research, science and health sectors; _________________ 1a Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - A European strategy for data, COM(2020)0066
Amendment 127 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6a. Considers that there are risks of biases and discrimination in the development, deployment and use of high- risk artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, including the software, algorithms and data used or produced by such technologies; recalls that, in all circumstances, those technologies should respect human dignity and ensure equal treatment for all; considers that such possible bias could be addressed by setting rules on data processing and setting up appropriate safeguards against bias and discrimination based on social, economic, ethnic, racial, sexual, gender, disability or other factors; warns of potential misuse of AI diagnostic applications and calls for AI capability and motivational safeguards;
Amendment 142 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7 a (new)
Paragraph 7 a (new)
7a. Calls to ensure transparency, responsibility, auditability, predictability and accountability, as citizens, patients and users should be informed when interacting with a system using artificial intelligence by clear and understandable explanations of the data used, of the functioning of the algorithm, of its purpose, of its outcomes, and of its potential dangers; underlines that transparency and explainability are essential to ensure trust in these technologies; considers that the explanation should be complemented by auditability and traceability as respect to such principles is a guarantee to accountability; reminds that AI applications can outperform the humans at narrow specific tasks while failing in overview analysis; calls for human oversight, professional responsibility and system predictability with ability to override the AI system;
Amendment 144 #
7b. Considers that any natural or legal person should be able to seek redress for a decision issued by a high-risk artificial intelligence, robotics or related technology at his or her detriment and that any decision taken by AI should be subject to strict human verification and due process; suggests that safeguards related to the use of high-risk artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies within the framework of public power decisions including periodic assessment and possible review of regulatory framework to keep up with technological development, establishing binding guidelines on the methodology of the compliance assessment to be followed by the national supervisory authorities, and establishing non-binding guidelines directed to the developers, the deployers and the users;