BETA

32 Amendments of Olle SCHMIDT related to 2010/2006(INI)

Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital N
N. whereas a limited number of banks (“Systemic Banks”) represent an extremely high level of systemic risk due to their size, complexity and interconnectedness across Europe, calling for an urgent andcross border banks have an international dimension and should therefore be subject to a targeted special regime,
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
O. whereas a special regime for Systemic Bcross- border banks, in order to be effective in supporting interventions, requires a common set of rules, appropriate expertise and financial resources,
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital P
P. whereas the fast-track special framework for Systemic Banks should evolve in the medium/long term towards a universal regime covering all banks in the Union.deleted
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 3
3. Attribute to the relevant supervisor the responsibility for crisis managementearly intervention and the approval of each bank’s contingency plan, as follows: • for Systemic Bcross-border banks: the European Banking Authority (EBA) in close cooperation with the college of national supervisors and the Cross Border Stability Groups (as defined in the above-mentioned Memorandum of Understanding of June 2008); • for all other cross border non-systemic banks: the consolidated supervisor within the college, under the coordination of the EBA and in consultation with the Cross Border Stability Groups; • for local banks: the local supervisor.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 4
4. Design an EU supervisors’ common set of rules for crisis management including common methodologies, definitions and terminology.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 5
5. Resolution plans to become a mandatory regulatory requirement. The requirement for the content of the plan should be proportionate to the bank's size, activities and geographical spread.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
8. Expand the crisis management minimumearly intervention toolbox available to supervisors, beyond the Article 136 of Directive 2006/48/EC, to include at least the power to:
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – indent 4
• impose a total or partial sale;deleted
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – indent 5
• create a Bridge Bank or Good Bank/Bad Bank;deleted
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – indent 6
• require swaps of debt into equity with appropriate haircuts;deleted
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – indent 7
• take temporary public control;deleted
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – indent 8
• winding-up.deleted
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – indent 8 a (new)
• control the process of intra-group asset transfers;
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – indent 8 b (new)
• impose on an institution a specified time limit in any aspect of their activities, to reduce their risks or the institution to take other action;
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – indent 8 c (new)
• impose that the CEO of the bank and / or member of the Executive Board should resign and at the same time appoint a replacement until the bank has appointed a new CEO and /or member of the Executive Board;
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1 – indent 8 d (new)
• impose a minimum amount of capital, which is greater than the sum of capital requirements for credit risk, market risk and operational risk, as calculated in accordance with the law, if there are deficiencies in the institution's solvency, liquidity, risk management, transparency and internal instructions;
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 1 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2
For banks contributing in the EU Financial Stability Fund, the supervisory powers shall include: • provision of direct loans; • injection of capital.deleted
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – title
Recommendation 2 on SystemicCross-Border Banks
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – paragraph 2
2. Systemic BCross-border banks shall adhere to the new special regime which shall overcome legal impediments to effective action across borders while ensuring clear, equal and predictable treatment of shareholders, depositors, creditors and other stakeholders, in particular after intra- group asset transfers.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – paragraph 3
3. The Commission shall adopt a measure setting up, before April 2011, criteria for definition of Systemic Bcross-border banks based on a draft elaborated by the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB).
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – paragraph 4
4. The ESRB shall draw, until December 2011, a list of Systemic Banks and update it on a regular basis.deleted
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – paragraph 5
5. For each of the Systemic Bcross-border banks, the EBA shall lead the college of supervisors, act under normal circumstances through national supervisors and retain the ultimate decision power and a binding mediating role.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 2 – paragraph 6
6. An EU Financial Stability Fund and a Resolution Unit shall support interventions led by the EBA (resolution or insolvency) as regards Systemic Bcross- border banks.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – paragraph 1
1. An EU Financial Stability Fund shall be created, under the responsibility of the EBA, to finance interventions (rehabilitation or orderly winding-up) aimed at preserving the system’s stability and limit contagion from failing banks. The Commission shall present to the Parliament, by April 2011, a proposal with details of the Fund’s charter, structure, governance, size, operating model as well as a precise calendar for implementation (in accordance with points 2 and 3 below).
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – paragraph 2 – indent 2
• funded ex-ante by the Systemic Banks on the basis of risk-based, countercyclical criteriaat least partially ex-ante whereby any potential bank levy will have to flow entirely into the Fund;
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 3 – paragraph 3 – indent 4
• conditions for eventual expansion of the scope of the Fund to include institutions beyond Systemic Banks.deleted
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 4 – paragraph 1
1. An independent resolution unit shall be established within the EBA to lead the resolution and insolvency procedures for Systemic Bcross-border banks. This unit shall: • operate within the strict boundaries defined by theits legal framework and the EBA’s competencies; • be a pool of legal and financial expertise specially skilled in bank restructurings, turnarounds and liquidation; • cooperate closely with national authorities on implementation, technical assistance and sharing of staff; • propose the disbursements from the Stability Fund.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 4 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. Provided by the establishment of criteria for when a cross-border bank should be considered in crisis and that decision is taken on such a state of crisis, the resolution unit is given adequate powers to deal with the situation.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 4 – paragraph 1 b (new)
1b. A clear distinction should be made between the powersthat the resolution unit should be given under "normal circumstances" and those powers the resolution unit shall be given in case of crisis.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 4 – paragraph 1 c (new)
1c. It is equally important that it clearly set out when a crisis will be deemed to exist and that a finding of such a permit may be preceded by a decision by the resolution unit.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 4 – paragraph 1 d (new)
1d. The independent resolution unit’s toolbox should include at least the power to: • impose a total or partial sale; • create a Bridge Bank or Good Bank/Bad Bank; • require swaps of debt into equity with appropriate haircuts; • take temporary public control; • winding-up; • impose the opportunity for redemption of shares in certain specified cases.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution
Annex – recommendation 4 – paragraph 1 e (new)
1e. For banks contributing to the EU Financial Stability Fund, the powers shall include: • provision of direct loans; • injection of capital.
2010/05/05
Committee: ECON