4 Amendments of Neena GILL related to 2017/2253(INI)
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital G
Recital G
G. whereas in its resolution of 19 January 2016 on stocktaking and challenges of the EU Financial Services Regulation, Parliament called on the Commission to ‘propose a consistent, coherent, transparent and practical framework for procedures and decisions on third-country equivalence, taking into account an outcome-based analysis and international standards or agreements’; whereas the Parliament stressed in the same resolution that capital markets in the Union remain fragmented; therefore, in order to make the CMU a success and to ensure that the financing of companies in the EU becomes less costly, underlines the need to elaborate a workable and effective equivalence regime given the fact the largest pools of European liquidity and capital still remains located in the UK;
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Considers that the EU should promote global financial regulatory reforms aimed at reducing systemic risk and enhancing financial stability, and should work towards an open, integrated and resilient financial system that supports sustainable economic growth, job creation and investment;s.
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Emphasises that one of the key objectives for equivalence isare to promote regulatory convergence on the basis of international standards; as well as to balance the needs of financial stability and investor protection in the EU on the one hand with the benefits of maintaining an open and globally integrated EU financial markets on the other;
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19 a (new)
Paragraph 19 a (new)
19 a. Calls for defining a consistent and transparent set of criteria for “high- impact”third countries.