Activities of Philip BRADBOURN related to 2011/2096(INI)
Plenary speeches (1)
Single European transport area (debate)
Shadow reports (1)
REPORT on the Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system PDF (300 KB) DOC (206 KB)
Amendments (15)
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – indent 1
Paragraph 1 – indent 1
– that, by 2013, the Commission should make specific proposals, on the basis of the report on European road safety 2011- 2020, tocome forward with proposals for reduceing the number of deaths and severe injuries on the roads by 50% in relation to 2010; action in this area must be based upon the principle of subsidiarity and based on Member State cooperation through an exchange of best practice;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2 – introductory part
Paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. Approves the goals set in the White Paper for 2050, but considers that more specific provisions are required for the period until 2020 with regard to funding – in view of the economic situation of individual Member States – and the general challenges facing transport in the field of energy and the environment, and therefore calls on the Commission to draw up legal rulework with international partners to draw up legal rules through global agreements to reach the following goals by 2020 (in relation to 2010 reference figures):
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. SCalls for further liberalisation of transport networks and stresses that the completion of the European internal transport market should be aimed for, without neglecting economic, employment and social aspects, and calls on the Commission to ensure that proposals on liberalising the airport, rail, road, and other markets do not lead to social dumping or private monopolies;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 1 a (new)
Paragraph 5 – indent 1 a (new)
- revision of the TEN-T program should support diversification and the connectivity between priority corridors and their populations with particular regard to the easing of bottle-necks without discriminating against any specific modes of transport;
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 3
Paragraph 5 – indent 3
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 5 – indent 5 a (new)
Paragraph 5 – indent 5 a (new)
- further development of secure coach and lorry parking facilities across the TEN-T network should be a priority within the programme;
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 (new)
Accepts, however, that not only is it not within the EU’s competence, but it is both unrealistic and undesirable for the EU to try to enforce a phase out of conventionally fuelled cars from city centres by 2050;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 8
Paragraph 8
8. Requests, by 2015, a proposal on urban mobility in which, whilst respecting the principle of subsidiarity, support for projects is made conditional upon the submissionStresses the importance of urban mobility plansning, which provide for efficient passenger and goods logistics chains, contribute to a reduction in traffic volumes and environmental pollution (atmospheric pollution and noise), comply with the standards of European transport pounderstands, however, that urban mobilicty and are coherent with regard to surrounding towns and regionsis not an EU competence;
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 9
Paragraph 9
9. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable means of transport, where proposals should be made by 2013 to develop infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists in towns, to douwhile developing and diversifying transport infrastructure is desirable, the number of passengers on public transport, which mainly uses alternative sources of energy, and to establish e-tickets for multi-modal travel, and where pricing policy should be considered as an incentiveraffic share must ultimately be determined by the market;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 11 – indent 2
Paragraph 11 – indent 2
– creating intelligent, interoperational and linked systems for transport guidance, supporting SESAR, Galileo, ERTMS, PIDS, SafeSeaNet, LRIT und ITS and providing the required funding;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 13
Paragraph 13
Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – indent 1
Paragraph 15 – indent 1
– social regulation on road transport to be amended to allow more flexibility whilst maintaining a safe approach to drivers rest hours; calls for another review of the rules on driving and rest times for passenger and goods transport, and the implementation thereof, by 2014,;
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 – indent 1 a (new)
Paragraph 15 – indent 1 a (new)
- the Working Time Directive for mobile workers to be clarified, especially in its definition of duty-time and time not spent specifically in control of a vehicle;
Amendment 389 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 – indent 2
Paragraph 18 – indent 2
– a harmonisation of the rules on vehicle registration by 2015, so thatn improvement in the cpertification of rolling stock may not take longer than two months, and relevant changes to the responsibilities of the European Railway Agency and its funding by 2012formance of the European Railway Agency before any additional competences or funding can be considered;
Amendment 393 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 18 – indent 3
Paragraph 18 – indent 3
– the independence and strengthening of national regulatory authorities, in the interest of more efficient railways, and the submission, by 2014, of a Commission proposal to establish a European regulatory authority;