Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | GROSCH Mathieu ( PPE) | SEHNALOVÁ Olga ( S&D), MEISSNER Gesine ( ALDE), CRAMER Michael ( Verts/ALE), BRADBOURN Philip ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | ENVI | SONIK Bogusław ( PPE) | |
Committee Opinion | EMPL | ||
Committee Opinion | REGI | OLEJNICZAK Wojciech Michał ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | IMCO | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | KARIŅŠ Krišjānis ( PPE) | Claude TURMES ( Verts/ALE) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54
Legal Basis:
RoP 54Subjects
Events
The Commission presents a staff working document on the implementation of the initiatives under the 2011 White Paper on Transport, five years after publication. To recall, the White Paper strategy is characterised by four broad areas of intervention: internal market, innovation, infrastructure, international aspects. For each of these areas, a ten-year programme was defined with 40 specific action points, containing within each point a handful of specific initiatives of different nature, different time horizon and different economic/political relevance.
The document recalls the European Parliament’s resolution of 2015 , taking stock of the 2011 White Paper and making recommendations on sustainable mobility.
It examines developments and initiatives in each mode of transport, and looks at initiatives on social issues and security, as well as on innovation, infrastructure, and recent trends and developments in the transport sector.
Main achievements: t he Commission states that it has made a significant progress in the five years since the adoption of the White Paper programme, having issued proposals in most of the 40 action points of the programme. Looking at the total of 132 initiatives announced in the White Paper, 68 initiatives can be considered as completed by the Commission (e.g. by making a legislative proposal). Moreover, several action points of the programme have been further developed under various Commission strategies supporting the ten priority areas of the current Commission, notably the Energy Union and the Digital Single Market .
However, stakeholders’ feedback to the Commission showed that most were not satisfied with the progress achieved so far. This negative assessment referred to the slow follow-up to Commission initiatives , and the view that the legislator adopted acts that were less ambitious than Commission proposals. Stakeholders strongly expected that the challenges should be addressed more through:
· a better focus on implementation of the White Paper;
· increased and well-justified investments in transport infrastructure,
· a stronger Single European Transport Area ;
· more account of technological developments, and
· better consideration of the needs of transport users and workers.
Social aspects, digitalisation and automation were other important aspects that required more recognition in the transport policy agenda. Additional efforts were also called for to improve road safety and to safeguard the competitiveness of European transport operators vis-à-vis international competitors.
The European Parliament adopted by 523 votes to 64 with 37 abstentions, a legislative resolution following the Commission White Paper entitled ‘Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system’.
Members welcome the 2001 White Paper but note that the major goals of the latter were achieved either only in part or not at all. They make the following recommendations:
· by 2013, the Commission should make specific proposals, based on the report on European road safety 2011-2020 and in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, to reduce the number of deaths and severe injuries on the roads by 50% by 2020 in relation to 2010. These proposals should pay special attention to the most vulnerable road users and indicate, in each case, the results expected in terms of accident reduction;
· by 2014, the Commission should submit a proposal to provide for the internalisation of the external costs of all modes of freight and passenger transport in accordance with their specific nature, whilst avoiding double charging and market distortions. The revenue from this internalisation of external costs should be used to fund investment in safety, research, new technologies, climate protection and noise reduction in the context of sustainable mobility and in infrastructure.
The Commission is also asked to submit:
· a proposal on social and working conditions by 2013, in order to facilitate the creation of a genuinely integrated European transport market and, at the same time, enhance the attractiveness of the sector for workers. This proposal should be based on an in-depth analysis of the current situation with regard to social and working conditions in all transport modes and the degree of harmonisation between the laws of the Member States, and on an assessment of the impact of developments on the transport labour market over the period to 2020. It should increase employment and improve the situation of workers throughout the transport sector and take account of new technologies and logistical services which can be used to improve transport services in general and for disabled people in particular;
· by 2013 a coherent, quantitative analysis of the current situation with regard to the level of infrastructure, the density of the transport network and the quality of transport services in all EU Member States. This will provide an overview of the current situation in the EU27, highlight inequalities in the development of transport infrastructure between the Member States and their regions and outline the way transport infrastructure across all modes is currently funded and future investment priorities.
Resource-efficient transport system : Parliament approves the 10 goals for a competitive and resource-efficient transport system and the targets set in the White Paper for 2050 and 2030, but considers that more specific provisions are required for the period to 2020 with regard to funding and the general challenges facing transport. It calls on the Commission to draw up legal rules to achieve a 20% reduction in emissions of CO2 and other GHGs from transport (by comparison with 1990 reference figures) and the following intermediate goals by 2020 (by comparison with 2010 reference figures), in accordance with the 20-20-20 targets:
· a 20% reduction in CO2 emissions from road transport,
· a 20% reduction in noise and energy consumption for rail transport,
· a 30% reduction in CO2 emissions from air transport across European airspace,
· an EU-wide uniform 30% reduction in emissions of CO2 and pollutants in shipping, to which the IMO agreements on the Energy Efficiency Design Index and the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan will make a contribution.
These goals should be considered priorities, which should be checked every year.
Single European transport area : Members highlight the as yet insufficiently explored potential of transport in many areas, and insist on the importance of a single European transport area, with interconnection and interoperability, based on genuinely European management of transport infrastructure and systems achieved by eliminating 'border-effects' between Member States in all transport modes, in order to enhance the competitiveness and attractiveness of the entire EU. They stress the importance of territorial cohesion and, in particular, the accessibility problems facing the outermost regions, islands, landlocked and peripheral regions.
TEN-T networks : Members welcome the Commission's proposal on the ' Connecting Europe Facility ' and the Project Bonds Initiative , and urge that:
· Member States commit themselves to eliminating the main known bottlenecks in every transport mode in the European transport area by 2020 and, if necessary, encourage their circumvention by establishing an intermodal infrastructure at the start and end points of a stretch, to prioritise cross-border projects between all the Member States, without neglecting connections to neighbouring countries, and to submit an approved funding plan by 2015;
· the Commission commits itself to increasing the stability of funding of TEN-T projects, in coordination with regional policy;
· the Commission commits itself to supporting alternative funding models and instruments, including project bonds, and to providing for increased use of that revenue to fund TEN-T projects when making proposals to internalise external costs;
· in order to ensure the long-term effectiveness and visibility of EU action in the framework of TEN-T, the definition of priorities must be seen in close connection with the conditions governing the use of regional structural funds and the Member States must be required to guarantee funding for these projects beyond the end of the EU's multiannual programmes;
· project priorities should only be maintained after 2015 if Member States have taken binding budget decisions to ensure the implementation of the projects and that EU co-funding should be based on the ‘use it or lose it’ principle;
· EuroVelo, the European long-distance cycle route network, should be included in the TEN-T network.
Renewable energy : Parliament stresses the importance of a coherent strategy for making the transition to alternative and renewable energies for transport and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable physically active, safe and healthy means of transport and mobility. In this respect, Members propose that:
· the Commission and the Member States, in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, submit by 2013 proposals to develop initiatives that promote environmentally friendly public transport, walking and cycling, especially in towns and cities;
· by 2015, a proposal is presented on urban mobility in which, in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, support for projects is made conditional on the submission by local authorities of sustainable mobility plans for efficient passenger and goods logistics chains in urban and built-up areas.
Parliament believes that the basic rules on passengers' rights should be laid down in a Charter of Passengers' Rights covering all forms of transport, and therefore expects the Commission to put forward, at the latest at the beginning of 2012, a corresponding proposal. It also calls on Member States to support and work towards the establishment of a level playing field between all modes of transport in terms of energy taxation and value added tax (VAT).
Recommendations : lastly, the resolution makes a series of recommendations on the specific sectors of road transport, shipping, air transport, and rail transport.
Road transport : another review, by 2013, of the regulatory framework governing driving and rest periods in passenger and goods transport; (ii) the targets already set to be met and for fresh impetus to be given to the priority projects in the Trans-European Road Network; (iii) an overall 40% increase by 2020, as compared with 2010 figures, in the number of secure parking spaces for heavy goods vehicles on the Trans-European Road Network (TERN) and improvements in their quality (hygiene standards); (iv) support Member State initiatives to create a safe and environmentally-friendly fleet by means of tax incentives; (v) an improvement in the initial and further training of persons employed in the transport sector, including those providing transport-related services for passengers, and in access to the professions concerned, in order to improve working conditions and salaries and to boost the attractiveness of these professions.
Shipping : (i) a proposal to be put forward by 2013 on the ‘Blue Belt’; (ii) introduction of a European policy for short and medium sea shipping; (iii) a proposal on a 20% increase in the number of multi-modal connections (platforms) for inland waterways, inland ports and rail transport by 2020, and corresponding financial support; (iv) under the next multiannual financial framework for the period 2014-2020, the allocation of at least 15% of TEN-T funding to projects that improve sustainable and multimodal connections between seaports, inland ports and multimodal platforms.
Air transport : (i) promote the implementation of the Single European Sky II, and by 2013 a proposal on the completion of a single European airspace through a reduction in the number of functional airspace blocks; (ii) service quality, and coordination with international standards, to be prioritised in further proposals on market liberalization; (iii) take all the steps required to ensure that European trading in emissions certificates is internationally accepted by 2012, thereby guaranteeing a level playing field internationally.
Rail transport : (i) the Commission take Member States' commitments in relation to local public transport and existing service levels into account when proposing further opening-up of the markets;(ii) greater promotion of technical harmonisation and interoperability between the Member States, and in particular harmonisation of the rules on the authorisation of vehicles by 2015; (iii) the Commission to submit, no later than on 31 December 2012, a proposal for a directive containing provisions on the relationship between infrastructure management and transport operations and a proposal for opening-up the domestic rail passenger market which does not detract from the quality of rail transport services and safeguards public service obligations; (v) the Commission to evaluate the impact that the opening-up of the rail freight market has had on single wagonload traffic and, should it emerge that the volume of such traffic has declined, to submit, no later than 31 December 2012, a proposal to allow Member States to support this activity.
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the own-initiative report by Mathieu Grosch and welcomes the Commission White Paper entitled ‘Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system’. It notes, however, that major goals of the 2001 White Paper were achieved either only in part or not at all, and proposes:
that, by 2013, the Commission should make specific proposals, based on the report on European road safety 2011-2020 and in keeping with the principle of subsidiarity, to reduce the number of deaths and severe injuries on the roads by 50% by 2020 in relation to 2010. These proposals should pay special attention to the most vulnerable road users and indicate, in each case, the results expected in terms of accident reduction; that, by 2014, the Commission should submit a proposal to provide for the internalisation of the external costs of all modes of freight and passenger transport in accordance with their specific nature, whilst avoiding double charging and market distortions. The revenue from this internalisation of external costs should be used to fund investment in safety, research, new technologies, climate protection and noise reduction in the context of sustainable mobility and in infrastructure.
The Commission is also asked to submit:
a proposal on social and working conditions by 2013, in order to facilitate the creation of a genuinely integrated European transport market and, at the same time, enhance the attractiveness of the sector for workers. This proposal should be based on an in-depth analysis of the current situation with regard to social and working conditions in all transport modes and the degree of harmonisation between the laws of the Member States, and on an assessment of the impact of developments on the transport labour market over the period to 2020. It should increase employment and improve the situation of workers throughout the transport sector and take account of new technologies and logistical services which can be used to improve transport services in general and for disabled people in particular; by 2013 a coherent, quantitative analysis of the current situation with regard to the level of infrastructure, the density of the transport network and the quality of transport services in all EU Member States. This will provide an overview of the current situation in the EU27, highlight inequalities in the development of transport infrastructure between the Member States and their regions and outline the way transport infrastructure across all modes is currently funded and future investment priorities.
The committee want the Commission to formulate legal rules to achieve a 20% reduction in emissions of CO2 and other GHGs from transport (by comparison with 1990 reference figures) and the following intermediate goals by 2020 (by comparison with 2010 reference figures), in accordance with the 20-20-20 targets and in cooperation with international partners:
a 20% reduction in CO2 emissions from road transport, a 20% reduction in noise and energy consumption for rail transport, a 30% reduction in CO2 emissions from air transport across European airspace, an EU-wide uniform 30% reduction in emissions of CO2 and pollutants in shipping, to which the IMO agreements on the Energy Efficiency Design Index and the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan will make a contribution.
These goals should be considered priorities, which should be checked every year.
Members highlight the as yet insufficiently explored potential of transport in many areas, and insist on the importance of a single European transport area, with interconnection and interoperability, based on genuinely European management of transport infrastructure and systems achieved by eliminating 'border-effects' between Member States in all transport modes, in order to enhance the competitiveness and attractiveness of the entire EU. They stress the importance of territorial cohesion and, in particular, the accessibility problems facing the outermost regions, islands, landlocked and peripheral regions and good connections between Member States and their neighbouring countries.
Members welcome the Commission's proposal on the ' Connecting Europe Facility ' and the Project Bonds Initiative , and urge that:
Member States commit themselves to eliminating the main known bottlenecks in every transport mode in the European transport area by 2020 and, if necessary, encourage their circumvention by establishing an intermodal infrastructure at the start and end points of a stretch, to prioritise cross-border projects between all the Member States, without neglecting connections to neighbouring countries, and to submit an approved funding plan by 2015; the Commission commits itself to increasing the stability of funding of TEN-T projects, in coordination with regional policy; the Commission commits itself to supporting alternative funding models and instruments, including project bonds, and to providing for increased use of that revenue to fund TEN-T projects when making proposals to internalise external costs; in order to ensure the long-term effectiveness and visibility of EU action in the framework of TEN-T, the definition of priorities must be seen in close connection with the conditions governing the use of regional structural funds and the Member States must be required to guarantee funding for these projects beyond the end of the EU's multiannual programmes; project priorities should only be maintained after 2015 if Member States have taken binding budget decisions to ensure the implementation of the projects and that EU co-funding should be based on the ‘use it or lose it’ principle; EuroVelo, the European long-distance cycle route network, should be included in the TEN-T network;
The report goes on to call for:
by 2013, proposals to develop initiatives that promote environmentally friendly public transport, walking and cycling, especially in towns and cities, with the aim of doubling their number of users; by 2015, a proposal on urban mobility in which support for projects is made conditional on the submission by local authorities of sustainable mobility plans for efficient passenger and goods logistics chains in urban and built-up areas.
Member States are asked to work towards the establishment of a level playing field between all modes of transport in terms of energy taxation and value added tax.
Lastly, the report makes a series of recommendations on the specific sectors of road transport, shipping, air transport, and rail transport.
The Council held a debate on the White Paper on transport issued by the Commission in March. Ministers were invited to respond to a questionnaire drawn up by the presidency, focusing on the overall target, the benchmark goals and the initiatives for implementing them, set out in the White Paper.
Member States generally welcomed the White Paper as a very comprehensive document which contributes to achieving the Union's environmental goals, completing the internal market and tackling dependence on oil.
However, in the opinion of many delegations, the 60% reduction objective is highly ambitious and should be considered an indicative target , not a binding one. In addition, in order to maintain the Union's competitiveness, similar commitments should be sought at international level. Moreover, several delegations underscored the need to adjust policy measures to the specific situations in different parts of the Union or, more particularly, the need to tackle the infrastructure development disparities between different Member States.
Key priorities highlighted by delegations in their oral and written contributions include: (i) support to research, innovation and new technologies; (ii) the interconnection of transport networks across the Union and the creation of a homogeneous multimodal trans-European transport network; (iii) the completion of the single European market in the field of transport; (iv) the internalisation of external costs in all modes of transport; (v) the development of new financing mechanisms, road safety, and the promotion of multimodal freight corridors and of full modal integration.
Some Member States also stressed that the economic impact and the financial consequences of the proposed initiatives needed to be carefully assessed.
The Commission is invited to take the results of these discussions into account when further elaborating the initiatives to create a sustainable transport system.
PURPOSE: to present a Roadmap to a single European transport area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system (Commission White Paper).
BACKGROUND: since the 2001 White Paper on Transport, much has been achieved. Further market opening has taken place in aviation, road and partly in rail transport. The Single European Sky has been successfully launched. The safety and security of transport across all modes has increased. New rules on working conditions and on passenger rights have been adopted. Trans-European transport networks (financed through TEN-T, Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund) have contributed to territorial cohesion and the building of high-speed railway lines. Much has also been done to enhance transport’s environmental performance.
Still, the transport system is not sustainable. Looking 40 years ahead, it is clear that transport cannot develop along the same path. If we stick to the business as usual approach:
· the oil dependence of transport might still be little below 90%, with renewable energy sources only marginally exceeding the 10% target set for 2020;
· CO2 emissions from transport would remain one third higher than their 1990 level by 2050;
· congestion costs will increase by about 50% by 2050;
· the accessibility gap between central and peripheral areas will widen;
· the social costs of accidents and noise would continue to increase.
In its Communication Roadmap for moving toward a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 the Commission shows a reduction of at least 60% of GHGs by 2050 with respect to 1990 is required from the transport sector, which is a significant and still growing source of GHGs. By 2030, the goal for transport will be to reduce GHG emissions to around 20% below their 2008 level.
CONTENT: building on the lessons learnt, this Roadmap takes a global look at developments in the transport sector, at its future challenges and at the policy initiatives that need to be considered. It presents the Commission’s vision of future transport and sets out the key measures to achieve.
A VISION FOR A COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT SYSTEM: the transport industry in itself represents an important part of the economy: in the EU it directly employs around 10 million people and accounts for about 5% of GDP . Coherence at EU level is vital. The EU and Governments need to provide clarity on the future policy frameworks (relying to the greatest extent possible on market based mechanisms) for manufacturers and industry so that they are able to plan investments.
The challenge is to break the transport system’s dependence on oil without sacrificing its efficiency and compromising mobility. New transport patterns must emerge, according to which larger volumes of freight and greater numbers of travellers are carried jointly to their destination by the most efficient (combination of) modes. Future development must rely on a number of strands:
improving the energy efficiency performance of vehicles across all modes, developing and deploying sustainable fuels and propulsion systems; optimising the performance of multimodal logistic chains, including by making greater use of inherently more resource-efficient modes, where other technological innovations may be insufficient (e.g. long distance freight); using transport and infrastructure more efficiently through use of improved traffic management and information systems (e.g. ITS, SESAR, ERTMS, SafeSeaNet, RIS), advanced logistic and market measures such as full development of an integrated European railway market, removal of restrictions on cabotage, abolition of barriers to short sea shipping, undistorted pricing etc.
The Commission proposes to increase the competitiveness of transport while delivering the minimum 60% reduction of GHG emissions from transport needed by 2050, orienting itself along the ten goals which should be seen as benchmarks:
(1) Halve the use of ‘conventionally-fuelled’ cars in urban transport by 2030; phase them out in cities by 2050; achieve essentially CO2-free city logistics in major urban centres by 2030.
(2) Low-carbon sustainable fuels in aviation to reach 40% by 2050; also by 2050 reduce EU CO2 emissions from maritime bunker fuels by 40% (if feasible 50%).
(3) 30% of road freight over 300 km should shift to other modes such as rail or waterborne transport by 2030, and more than 50% by 2050, facilitated by efficient and green freight corridors. To meet this goal will also require appropriate infrastructure to be developed.
(4) By 2050, complete a European high-speed rail network. Triple the length of the existing high-speed rail network by 2030 and maintain a dense railway network in all Member States. By 2050 the majority of medium-distance passenger transport should go by rail.
(5) A fully functional and EU-wide multimodal TEN-T ‘core network’ by 2030, with a high quality and capacity network by 2050 and a corresponding set of information services.
(6) By 2050, connect all core network airports to the rail network, preferably high-speed; ensure that all core seaports are sufficiently connected to the rail freight and, where possible, inland waterway system.
(7) Deployment of the modernised air traffic management infrastructure (SESAR) in Europe by 2020 and completion of the European Common Aviation Area. Deployment of equivalent land and waterborne transport management systems (ERTMS, ITS, SSN and LRIT, RIS). Deployment of the European Global Navigation Satellite System (Galileo).
(8) By 2020, establish the framework for a European multimodal transport information, management and payment system.
(9) By 2050, move close to zero fatalities in road transport. In line with this goal, the EU aims at halving road casualties by 2020. Make sure that the EU is a world leader in safety and security of transport in all modes of transport.
(10) Move towards full application of “user pays” and “polluter pays” principles and private sector engagement to eliminate distortions, including harmful subsidies, generate revenues and ensure financing for future transport investments.
THE STRATEGY : the Commission considers that implementing this vision requires an efficient framework for transport users and operators, an early deployment of new technologies and the development of adequate infrastructure.
A Single European Transport Area: the objective for the next decade is to create a genuine Single European Transport Area by eliminating all residual barriers between modes and national systems, easing the process of integration and facilitating the emergence of multinational and multimodal operators . A vigilant enforcement of the competition rules across all transport modes will complement the Commission’s actions in this area. A higher degree of convergence and enforcement of social, safety, security and environmental rules, minimum service standards and users’ rights must be an integral part of this strategy, in order to avoid tensions and distortions.
The Single European Sky needs to be implemented as envisaged, and already in 2011 the Commission will address the capacity and quality of airports. The area where bottlenecks are still most evident is the internal market for rail services, which must be completed as a priority in order to achieve a Single European Railway Area.
This includes the abolishment of technical, administrative and legal obstacles which still impede entry to national railway markets. A further integration of the road freight market will render road transport more efficient and competitive. For maritime transport, a “Blue Belt” in the seas around Europe shall simplify the formalities for ships travelling between EU ports.
Innovating for the future – technology and behaviour: innovation is essential for this strategy. EU research needs to address the full cycle of research, innovation and deployment in an integrated way through focusing on the most promising technologies and bringing together all actors involved. Innovation can also play a role in promoting more sustainable behaviour. The Commission considers that technological innovation can achieve a faster and cheaper transition to a more efficient and sustainable European transport system by acting on three main factors: (i) vehicles’ efficiency through new engines, materials and design; (ii) cleaner energy use through new fuels and propulsion systems; (iii) better use of network and safer and more secure operations through information and communication systems.
Modern infrastructure, smart pricing and funding: efforts towards a more competitive and sustainable transport system need to include a reflection on the required characteristics of the network and must foresee adequate investments. EU transport infrastructure policy needs a common vision and sufficient resources. The costs of transport should be reflected in its price in an undistorted way.
A well-performing transport network requires substantial resources. The cost of EU infrastructure development to match the demand for transport has been estimated at over EUR 1.5 trillion for 2010-2030. The completion of the TEN-T network requires about EUR 550 billion until 2020 out of which some EUR 215 billion can be referred to the removal of the main bottlenecks. This does not include investment in vehicles, equipment and charging infrastructure which may require an additional trillion to achieve the emission reduction goals for the transport system.
The various actions and measures indicated in this Road Map will be further elaborated. The Commission will prepare appropriate legislative proposals in the next decade with key initiatives to be put forward during the current mandate. Each of its proposals will be preceded by a thorough impact assessment, considering EU added value and subsidiarity aspects.
Documents
- Follow-up document: SWD(2016)0226
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)162
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament: T7-0584/2011
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Committee report tabled for plenary: A7-0425/2011
- Committee opinion: PE472.029
- Contribution: COM(2011)0144
- Contribution: COM(2011)0144
- Committee opinion: PE472.020
- Committee opinion: PE469.856
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE472.267
- Committee draft report: PE469.845
- Contribution: COM(2011)0144
- Debate in Council: 3098
- Contribution: COM(2011)0144
- Contribution: COM(2011)0144
- For information: EUR-Lex
- For information: COM(2011)0144
- For information: SEC(2011)0358
- For information: EUR-Lex
- For information: EUR-Lex
- For information: SEC(2011)0359
- For information: EUR-Lex
- For information: SEC(2011)0391
- Non-legislative basic document published: EUR-Lex
- Non-legislative basic document published: COM(2011)0144
- For information: EUR-Lex COM(2011)0144
- For information: SEC(2011)0358 EUR-Lex
- For information: EUR-Lex SEC(2011)0359
- For information: EUR-Lex SEC(2011)0391
- Committee draft report: PE469.845
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE472.267
- Committee opinion: PE469.856
- Committee opinion: PE472.020
- Committee opinion: PE472.029
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2012)162
- Follow-up document: SWD(2016)0226
- Contribution: COM(2011)0144
- Contribution: COM(2011)0144
- Contribution: COM(2011)0144
- Contribution: COM(2011)0144
- Contribution: COM(2011)0144
Activities
- Michael CRAMER
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Mathieu GROSCH
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Laurence J.A.J. STASSEN
Plenary Speeches (2)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Roberta ANGELILLI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Georges BACH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Zigmantas BALČYTIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Philip BRADBOURN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Antonio CANCIAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Spyros DANELLIS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Viorica DĂNCILĂ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Isabelle DURANT
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Saïd EL KHADRAOUI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Jacqueline FOSTER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Juozas IMBRASAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Krišjānis KARIŅŠ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Dieter-Lebrecht KOCH
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Petru Constantin LUHAN
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Miguel Angel MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Gesine MEISSNER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Miroslav MIKOLÁŠIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Andreas MÖLZER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Gilles PARGNEAUX
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Jaroslav PAŠKA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Hubert PIRKER
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Vilja SAVISAAR-TOOMAST
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Debora SERRACCHIANI
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Olga SEHNALOVÁ
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Bogusław SONIK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Nuno TEIXEIRA
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Silvia-Adriana ȚICĂU
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Georgios TOUSSAS
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Marita ULVSKOG
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
- Oldřich VLASÁK
Plenary Speeches (1)
- 2016/11/22 Single European transport area (debate)
Amendments | Dossier |
559 |
2011/2096(INI)
2011/09/13
ITRE
48 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges that the EU has to move towards a more sustainable and efficient transport sector which contributes to its emission reduction targets
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that energy saving policies for the transport sector must not result in curbing mobility and that any emission reduction requirements have to be evaluated for their effect on competitiveness; calls for the creation of a new financial instrument under the 2014- 2020 financial framework so that urban mobility plans can be cofinanced; believes that a resource-
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that energy saving and emission reduction policies for the transport sector must not result in curbing mobility and that any emission reduction requirements have to be evaluated for their effect on competitiveness and any new targets can be set only if there is broad agreement between all involved parties and the targets can be reached by implementing technological progress made; believes that a resource-
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that energy saving policies for the transport sector
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Stresses that energy saving policies for the transport sector must not result in curbing mobility and that any emission reduction requirements have to be evaluated for their effect on competitiveness of the European industry ; believes that a resource-
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Emphasises the high potential of energy efficiency and renewable energy sources for the transport sector; stresses that the energy and climate targets for the transport sector can be reached by applying a mix of different energy sources and by exploiting the existing energy saving options;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Notes that many innovations in fuel efficient technology are already fully available on the market;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 b (new) 2b. Emphasises the importance of promoting electro-mobility to meet the EU2020 goals; urges the Commission and Member States to swiftly adopt common interoperable standards and to roll-out charging infrastructure across the EU;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises the great potential ICT
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises the great potential ICT has to reduce transport emissions in travel and freight, especially in connection with a future energy system in which electrified transport plays a crucial role; stresses the need to promote innovative solutions such as optimised route planning, intermodality or communication between vehicles and infrastructure; recalls that use of ICT can help reduce the need to travel;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges that the EU has to move towards a more efficient and competitive transport sector which contributes to its emission reduction targets and to lowering energy dependency;
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises the great potential ICT has to reduce transport emissions in travel and freight; stresses the need to promote innovative solutions such as optimised route planning, intermodality or communication between vehicles and infrastructure; recalls that use of ICT can help reduce the need to travel, for both individuals and businesses;
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Emphasises the great potential
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the need for intra-modal transport solutions; that no single form of transport can deliver on all accounts as there is a clear need for a smarter combination of road transport, railway, aviation and shipping;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that the use of ITC in the road transport sector and its interfaces with other modes of transport will make a significant contribution to improving environmental performance, efficiency (energy efficiency included), road transport safety and security (the transport of dangerous goods included), public safety and the mobility of passengers and goods, while also ensuring the proper functioning of the internal market, greater competitiveness and higher employment; in order to ensure coordinated and efficient ITS use throughout the Union, it is necessary to introduce a series of specifications, including standards, on a case-by-case basis; these should be implemented in the context of the following priority actions and areas: provision at EU level of information services concerning multimodal transport options; provision at EU level of real-time traffic information services; data and procedures for supplying users free of charge wherever possible with standard minimum information concerning traffic in the context of road safety; availability on a harmonised basis of the eCall system, to be interoperable Union-wide; provision of information services concerning safe parking areas for lorries and commercial vehicles; and availability of reservation facilities for safe parking areas for such vehicles;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Stresses the imperative need of adapting ICT standardisation policy to market developments requiring interoperability which will contribute to speeding up work on technical standards for electric vehicles and smart grids and meters, with a view to its completion by 2012;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Reiterates the Parliaments opinion that there is a need for a wider deployment of modular road trains; that these are a sustainable solution which contributes to a higher energy efficiency level in the road transport sector; further acknowledges that the diverging set of rules which modular road trains encounter when crossing country borders are detrimental for an increased use of this method of road transport; calls upon the Commission to inquire which differences in rules can easily be bridged and how an increased level of cross- bordering transport by modular road trains can be ensured;
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. Considers, in the context of ITS applications and services which require exact and reliable data and positioning input, that infrastructures are needed using satellite technology or other advanced technologies, so as to ensure the requisite standards of precision; cutting- edge technologies such as Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) or EGNOS/Galileo could be used for implementing ITS applications, especially for the location and tracking of goods in transit, including intermodal transit;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that European research can provide new solutions to increase transport efficiency and welcomes the Commission's strategic approach in this regard; points out the need for a subprogramme dedicated to mobility with the objective to increase transport efficiency e.g. by promoting smart and interoperable routing systems for all transport modes integrating systems such as Galileo, SESAR, ERTMS etc; furthermore believes that more efficient ways of commercialising research results are needed;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that European research can provide new solutions to increase transport efficiency and welcomes the Commission’s strategic approach in this regard; believes that more efficient ways of commercialising research results are needed, together with further research into integration of ever increasing volumes of renewable energy in conjunction with a more intelligent energy system in which electrified transport is a central feature of the solution;
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Points out that European research can provide new solutions to
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges that the EU has to move towards a more efficient transport sector which contributes to its emission reduction targets and to lowering energy dependency on particularly unstable and undemocratic regimes;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls on the Commission to promote the development and the use of innovative devices to improve energy efficiency (e.g. spoilers for trucks and other forms of improved aerodynamics, or functioning) for all means of transport in a cost- efficient manner;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Encourages the Commission, the Council, the local authorities and the industry to put the 'electric mobility' debate into a well balanced context, including the potentials of the booming market of electric bicycles and the long years experience in mass transit by electrified tramways and trains;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Reiterates that fuel diversification and strengthening energy security are two major challenges for the EU transport sector to which electricity domestically produced out of various energy vectors, can contribute significantly;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Stresses the importance of SESAR (Single European Sky ATM Research) for the creation of the 'single European sky', and calls for EGNOS certification, given that this is a key element in terms of use by civil aviation;
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Underlines that the European Union should maintain its strong position on the world market in the field of sustainable transport and mobility products, such as rail signalling and infrastructure systems, mobility management soft ware. Insists therefore to increase its efforts within sustainable surface transport research and development.
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5.
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Advocates a
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Advocates an increased role for sustainable biofuels in particular second generation biofuels, in the EU energy mix; notes, nevertheless, that any introduction of a higher proportion of biofuels has to be well prepared, communicated and executed, that all relevant stakeholders have to be ready to supply the requested fuel mix at the time of introduction, and public authorities need to explain the consequences of any change in the fuel mix;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Advocates an increased role for sustainable biofuels in the EU energy mix; notes, nevertheless, that any introduction of a higher proportion of biofuels has to be well prepared, harmonized within the EU, communicated and executed, that all relevant stakeholders have to be ready to supply the requested fuel mix at the time of introduction, and public authorities need to explain the consequences of any change in the fuel mix;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Considers that diversification of energy sources is necessary for the security of supply and in this regards is of the opinion that any new tax incentives have to be considered form the point of view of sustainable and competitive fuel mix in the transport sector;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Acknowledges that the EU has to move towards a more efficient transport sector which contributes to its emission reduction targets
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Acknowledges that electrification of the transport sector, coupled with the introduction of more renewable energy in the electricity sector, is one of the key tools for reducing greenhouse gas emissions; states that electrification should focus in particular on facilitating passenger transport by means of electric cars, but that biofuels should be used in heavy goods transport and, over time, in air transport; states that the great potential of electric cars can only be realised, however, by taking the necessary regulatory and legislative measures and dismantling existing barriers;
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses that reducing administrative burdens is essential if there is to be full interoperability on Europe's railways; in particular, the authorisation procedure for rolling stock needs to be made more effective and standardised throughout the EU;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Believes that enterprises should be encouraged to promote competitive pricing so as to ensure that the price difference between non-polluting and energy-efficient vehicles and traditional vehicles does not disadvantage the former on the market;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Stresses that electric cars have huge potential as a means of transport, especially in urban areas, asks the Commission and Member States to step up work on developing common European standards for charging, and stresses that the development of smart grids is crucial for the success of electric cars;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Recognises that Europe's railway industry is increasingly vulnerable to competition on the EU market from third- country suppliers; expresses concern at the substantial barriers in existence that block EU suppliers from bidding for public contracts in non-EU countries;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 b (new) 5b. Draws attention to the role of electric vehicles in the development of energy- efficient transport, and recommends that the Member States act to implement Directive 2009/33/EC on the promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles, in the context of public transport;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 c (new) 5c. Points up the need to create, at European level, an even stronger environment for decarbonisation of the transport sector;
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 d (new) 5d. Calls for the transport sector to be included among energy utilities’ energy saving obligations, as put forward in the Commission’s recently submitted directive on energy efficiency;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 e (new) Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Underlines the many initiatives the European Union has taken to promote the competitiveness and efficiency of the European transport sector, such as the Eurovignette, the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems, fuel efficiency for vehicles and labelling of tyres;
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that the transport sector accounts for more than a quarter of total EU CO2 emissions, that the transport sector’s emissions are still rising and that, if there is to be a genuine change in that trend, the transport sector must be converted to new green technologies;
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Stresses that, in the transport sector, the inadequacy of infrastructure promoting energy efficiency should be remedied and the sector’s commitments to take action in this area should be stepped up, since energy saved remains the cheapest, most competitive, cleanest and safest form of energy;
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Is aware of the major contribution made by the transport sector to industrial policy, competitiveness and the EU's trade balance; notes that in 2009 exports of machinery and equipment in the transport sector totalled EUR 454.7 billion, accounting for 41.5% of all exports outside the EU-27; further notes that in 2009 the EU registered its biggest trade surpluses in the areas of machinery and equipment in the transport sector (EUR 112.6 billion) and transport services (EUR 21.5 billion);
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 source: PE-472.121
2011/09/21
ITRE
449 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 9 – having regard to the Commission’s communications entitled ‘the Citizens’ Network’ (COM(1995)0601) and ‘Action Plan on Urban Mobility’ (COM(2009)0490),
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that large divergences exist in terms of transport infrastructure and geographical accessibility on the one hand between the eastern and western parts of the EU and on the other hand between central and peripheral regions, which need to be tackled; takes the view that the transport system of the EU should not encourage increased traffic but should support balanced regional development
Amendment 10 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas transport can make a significant contribution to the EU 2020 Strategy, particularly with regard to employment, economic growth, research, energy, innovation and the environment, bearing in mind that safety and environmental protection must be promoted more consistently under the strategy,
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points to the role that cohesion policy plays in developing transport infrastructure; draws attention to the lack of financial resources in several Member States;
Amendment 100 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety and security aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and regions – should be the guiding idea for future transport policy, and that these parameters should be used to determine
Amendment 101 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety and security aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and regions – should be the guiding idea for future transport policy, and that these parameters should be used to determine modal distribution in countries and regions rather than retaining the proposed 300 km threshold for goods transport by road;
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, environmental protection, social and
Amendment 103 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency and territorial cohesion, environmental protection, social and employment conditions, high-quality service and safety aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and regions – should be the guiding idea for future transport policy, and that these parameters should be used to determine modal distribution in countries and regions rather than retaining the proposed 300 km threshold for goods transport by road;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety and security aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and regions – should be the guiding idea for future transport policy, and that these parameters should be used to determine modal distribution in countries and regions rather than retaining the proposed 300 km threshold for goods transport by road;
Amendment 105 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, territorial cohesion, environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and regions – should be the guiding idea for future transport policy, and that these parameters should be used to determine modal distribution in countries and regions rather than retaining the proposed 300 km threshold for goods transport by road;
Amendment 106 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, regional cohesion, environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and regions – should be the guiding idea for future transport policy, and that these parameters should be used to determine modal distribution in countries and regions rather than retaining the proposed 300 km threshold for goods transport by road;
Amendment 107 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, environmental protection, energy security, social and employment conditions, and safety and security aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure
Amendment 108 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, territorial cohesion, environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and regions – should be the guiding idea for future transport policy, and that these
Amendment 109 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, accessibility, environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas transport can make a significant contribution to the EU 2020 Strategy, particularly with regard to employment, research, energy, innovation and the environment, bearing in mind that safety and environmental protection must be promoted more consistently under the strategy; specific activities must be synchronised and coordinated,
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points to the role that cohesion policy plays in developing transport infrastructure; draws attention to the lack of financial resources in several Member States; takes the view that new financing instruments are necessary for the transport sector; calls on Member States to ensure sufficient national and regional funding in their budgetary planning and sufficient project planning and implementation capacities;
Amendment 110 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and regions – should be the guiding idea for future transport policy, and that these parameters should be
Amendment 111 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Points out that short and medium sea shipping, inland waterway and sea-river transport offer numerous economically viable opportunities over shorter distances than 300 km and should be encouraged by the EU;
Amendment 112 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses that an integrated transport policy not only between the transport modes but also on the entire value chain of transport and logistics services is necessary to suitably address the challenges of transport; secure consistency with environment, social, employment, industry, research, internal market and economic policies; enhance coordination amongst policy-makers in the European institutions as well as consistent and advanced dialogue and consultation with the logistics industry, transport services suppliers and customers;
Amendment 113 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 bis (new) 4 bis. Challenges the Commission’s assumption that freight transport over distances of less than 300 km will, by definition, be by road; stresses that other factors also play a decisive role when choosing other forms of transport: type of products, volume, whether transhipment facilities are available, whether there are transport experts in ports, etc.; calls on the Commission to develop a policy that supports sustainable and efficient co- modal transport and covers all transport segments (short, medium and long distances) for optimum modal distribution, irrespective of the distance;
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Refers to the fact that all carriers must interact in a complementary manner; calls for the development of scientifically sound shift targets. This is based on common indicators. Advances with respect to modal transfer targets should be statistically evaluated and checked in a fixed cycle;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Stresses the need for an integrated transport policy for the entire value chain of transport and logistics to suitably address the challenges of transport and mobility specially those derived from urban areas; Calls for an enhance coordination amongst policy-makers in the European institutions as well as permanent dialogue and consultation with the logistics industry, transport services suppliers and customers in a European logistic and mobility forum;
Amendment 116 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 bis (new) 4 bis. Underlines the importance of renewing and strengthening a truly European perspective in the management of transport infrastructure and systems (rail corridors for passengers and freight, Single European Sky, ports and airports and their connections to the transport network, a maritime area without borders, inland waterway transport, transnational operators, etc.) in order to eliminate the ‘border effect’ and enhance the competitiveness and attractiveness of the European Union;
Amendment 117 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Notes the high degree of dependence of the Union on imported fossil fuels, whose supply from outside the Union is related to significant risks in terms of the Union’s economic security and in terms of the flexibility of its external policy options, and calls upon the Commission to define and regularly measure the Union’s external security of energy supply and to propose legislation to set binding quantitative reduction targets for the use of imported fossil fuels in transport;
Amendment 118 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 bis (new) 4 bis. Recalls that the objective of the TENs, as stipulated in Article 170 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, is to promote the interconnection and interoperability of national networks as well as access to such networks, paying special attention to the need to link island, landlocked and peripheral regions with the central regions of the Union;
Amendment 119 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. Highlights the importance of developing the transport infrastructure of new Member States to achieve a single European transport area, and in particular, the more urgent need to develop the transport infrastructure of new Member States, including the roads infrastructure, as well as connecting these states’ infrastructures with those of the European Union neighbouring states; calls on the Commission to include the transport infrastructure development needs of new Member States in its future multiannual financial framework so that, by 2025, the transport infrastructure of the new Member States reaches the level of the other Member States;
Amendment 12 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C C. whereas transport can make a significant contribution to the EU 2020 Strategy, particularly with regard to employment, immigration, research, energy, innovation and the environment, bearing in mind that safety and environmental protection must be promoted more consistently under the strategy,
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points to the role that cohesion policy plays in developing transport infrastructure; draws attention to the lack of financial resources in several Member States; takes the view that new financing instruments are necessary for the transport sector which both provide support to that sector and achieve territorial cohesion; calls on Member States to ensure sufficient national funding in their budgetary planning and sufficient project planning and implementation capacities;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Stresses the vital role an efficiently- functioning logistics sector would play in driving down the costs of commerce, including eCommerce, and thereby fostering intra-EU and global trade and generating economic growth;
Amendment 121 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 ter (new) 4 ter. Stresses that an ambitious and efficient European transport and mobility policy requires an appropriate financial framework with sufficient resources. To that end, the current resources for transport and mobility must be increased in order to promote both public and private initiatives; welcomes and supports the European Commission proposal to introduce a new ‘Connecting Europe Facility’ for the next multiannual financial framework, but notes that the cost envisaged for fulfilling the objectives of the White Paper require the level of commitments needed until 2050;
Amendment 122 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Recognises that transport modes are complementary, that this complementarity is to be analysed primarily in terms of distance ranges, welcomes the indicative goals of the Transport White Paper in terms of long-distance overland freight transport and intermediate-distance overland passenger transport, interprets these goals as average values to be achieved in the Union as a whole while fully allowing for national and regional differences, and calls on the Commission to propose legislation on the collection and publication of statistical indicators that would lead to annual monitoring and reporting of progress towards those goals;
Amendment 123 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 b (new) 4 b. Highlights the yet insufficiently unexplored potential of transport on the Danube and in the Black Sea area, and calls on the Commission and the Member States along the Danube to achieve this potential by developing multimodal terminals, by modernising the Danube river ports, and by developing short- distance maritime corridors to the Black Sea;
Amendment 124 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 c (new) 4 c. Stresses that the last 10 years have been marked by decreasing investment in the maintenance and modernisation of rail transport infrastructure, which has led to a deterioration in the quality of European rail services and to a smaller rail transport market share; stresses the importance of rail transport to the future of European transport and calls on the Member States and the Commission to ensure the necessary funding for the maintenance and modernisation of rail infrastructure and the existing rail networks, and to analyse and plan the completion of a high-speed rail network to connect all capitals, major cities and industrial centres in the EU by 2050;
Amendment 125 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. Stresses that the TEN-T concept should provide for a limited number of sustainable projects with
Amendment 126 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. Stresses that the TEN-T concept should provide for a limited number of projects with European added value with higher levels of funding, and that:
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. Stresses that the TEN-T concept should provide for
Amendment 128 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 1 – Member States should commit themselves to
Amendment 129 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 1 – Member States should commit
Amendment 13 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C bis (new) C bis. whereas better access to the territories is a priority of the European transport policy, strengthened by the Treaty of Lisbon, and taking into account the necessary principle of territorial cohesion,
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points to the role that cohesion policy plays in developing transport infrastructure; draws attention to the lack of financial resources in several Member States; takes the view that new financing instruments are necessary for the transport sector but not to the detriment of Cohesion Policy's goals and recourses; calls on Member States to ensure sufficient national funding in their budgetary planning and sufficient project planning and implementation capacities;
Amendment 130 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 1 – Member States should commit themselves to eliminate the 25 known bottlenecks of 10 core corridors where the bulk of transport is conducted in the European transport area by 2020, to prioritise cross-border projects and to submit an approved funding plan by 2015;
Amendment 131 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 1 – Member States should commit themselves to eliminate the 25 known bottlenecks in the European transport area by 2020
Amendment 132 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 1 – Member States
Amendment 133 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 1 – Member States should commit themselves to eliminate the 25 known bottlenecks in the European transport area by 2020, to prioritise cross-border projects and to submit, by 2013, an approved funding plan
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 1 a (new) - revision of the TEN-T program should support diversification and the connectivity between priority corridors and their populations with particular regard to the easing of bottle-necks without discriminating against any specific modes of transport;
Amendment 135 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 1 a (new) - Member States should commit to prioritising the cross-border projects and to submitting an approved funding plan by 2015;
Amendment 136 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 2 – the Commission should commit itself to propose to Member States that its direct funding for such projects should amount to at least 30% of total investments in coordination with regional policy and in accordance with the 20-20-20 targets up to 2020;
Amendment 137 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 2 – the Commission
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 2 – the Commission should commit itself to propose to Member States that its direct funding for such projects should amount to a
Amendment 139 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 3 Amendment 14 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C bis (new) C bis. whereas improved transport for the regions is a priority of European transport policy, further strengthened by the Treaty of Lisbon and the need to take into account the principle of territorial cohesion,
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Points to the role that cohesion policy plays in developing transport infrastructure; draws attention to the lack of financial resources in several Member States; takes the view that new financing instruments are necessary for the transport sector; calls on Member States to ensure sufficient national funding in their budgetary planning and sufficient project planning and implementation capacities; stresses that increased EU cofinancing for infrastructure projects in convergence regions can help improve the absorption of Community support;
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 3 – the Commission should commit itself to support alternative funding models and instruments, including project bonds, and to
Amendment 141 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 3 – the Commission should commit itself to support alternative funding models and instruments, including project bonds
Amendment 142 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 3 – the Commission should commit itself to support alternative funding models and instruments, including project bonds, and to provide for
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 3 – the Commission
Amendment 144 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 3 – the Commission should commit itself to support alternative funding models and instruments, including project bonds, and to provide for increased use of that revenue both to fund TEN-T projects when making proposals to internalise external costs and to develop the transport infrastructure of the Member States;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 3 a (new) – Community and national investment plans for ‘e-freight’ and Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) should be adopted and implemented in a coordinated manner in order to allow an electronic flow of information alongside the physical flow of goods; – projects should be selected according to a strict cost/benefit analysis;
Amendment 146 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 4 –
Amendment 147 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 4 – the definition of priorities
Amendment 148 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 4 a (new) – the core network of multimodal freight corridors should be developed on the basis of the TEN-T projects and should work as a single entity, including intermodal infrastructure, intermodal platforms and equipment and ICT solutions;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 4 a (new) - the core network should be developed on the basis of the TEN-T priority projects and should include intermodal infrastructure, intermodal platforms and equipment and ICT solutions;
Amendment 15 #
Motion for a resolution Recital C bis (new) C bis. whereas improving the accessibility of the territories is a priority of European transport policy, further strengthened by the Treaty of Lisbon and the need to take into account the principle of territorial cohesion,
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. recalls the Commission's recommendation to use moneys from Cohesion Policy more resource-efficiently and prioritise transport projects that enhance sustainability and that are part of existing integrated transport strategies;
Amendment 150 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 4 bis (new) - the Commission should present a proposal to ensure that the state guarantees for private cofinancing in PPP and other forms do not prove to be a disincentive because of their burden in relation to the public deficit;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 5 – project priorities should only be maintained after 2015 if the Member States have taken binding budget decisions which ensure the implementation of the projects and the co-funding of the EU should be based on the ‘use it or lose it’ principle;
Amendment 152 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 5 – project priorities should only be maintained after 2015 if
Amendment 153 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 5 – project priorities
Amendment 154 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 5 a (new) - further development of secure coach and lorry parking facilities across the TEN-T network should be a priority within the programme;
Amendment 155 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 5 bis (new) - account should be taken in particular of the need to link island, landlocked and peripheral regions with the central regions of the Union in accordance with Article 170 of the TFEU;
Amendment 156 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 – indent 5 a (new) - EuroVelo, the European long-distance cycle route network, should be included in the TEN-T network;
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 bis (new) 5 bis. Calls for ambitious industrial policies to be developed in the field of transport, and encourages the Commission to make concrete proposals with regard to the strategic subsectors;
Amendment 158 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. Insists on ensuring the effectiveness and visibility of EU action in the field of TEN-T and better use of the EU’s financial contribution for the intended purposes;
Amendment 159 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 bis (new) 5 bis. Welcomes the Commission’s plea for clarity regarding future policy frameworks and for a coherent policy at EU level; is convinced that a clear long- term vision with regard to investments in European transport infrastructure, in conformity with EU environmental legislation, is the best way to ensure efficient implementation of EU infrastructure and transport policy; the transport and infrastructure policy of the Member States should graft onto this European strategy and even strengthen it where possible; in this context, repeatedly questioning planned and agreed investments or funding schemes has a detrimental effect;
Amendment 16 #
Motion for a resolution Recital D D. whereas certain goals of the last White Paper were not reached, and the goals set should therefore be regularly checked a
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Points out that transport networks play a leading role in spatial planning policies; notes that major transport infrastructure such as high-speed railways helps make regions less isolated while also boosting local development networks; highlights the importance of implementing specific regional projects linked to the construction of major infrastructure, involving as many partners as possible (local, regional and national authorities, private operators, civil society, etc.);
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 bis (new) 5 bis. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to present a joint strategy involving information, communication and consultation of the players involved, including, in particular, participation by the citizens concerned, on the needs, planning, development and financing of the infrastructure required for growth, mobility, development and employment, in accordance with commitments made under the Europe 2020 strategy;
Amendment 161 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that the same safety standards and the same standards on accessible services should apply to all kinds of passenger and goods transport at EU level and calls for a proposal to fund safety obligations, bearing in mind that, particularly in the case of maritime and air transport, international coordination is a prerequisite, and that current rules should be reviewed and/or replaced by 2015;
Amendment 162 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that the same s
Amendment 163 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that
Amendment 164 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that the same s
Amendment 165 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that the same s
Amendment 166 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that the same safety and security standards should apply to all kinds of passenger and goods transport at EU level and calls for a proposal to fund safety and security obligations, bearing in mind that, particularly in the case of maritime and air transport, international coordination is a prerequisite, and that current rules should be reviewed and/or replaced by 2015 to better integrate a risk-based approach where appropriate allowing to differentiate screening requirements by 2015;
Amendment 167 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that the same
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that the same s
Amendment 169 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 17 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E E. whereas carriers, should not
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recalls the crucial role that regional policy plays in the adjustment that is necessary for the balanced development of transport in Europe, guaranteeing infrastructure investment in the regions in line with their level of wealth; stresses the importance of conserving the main elements of infrastructure financing encompassed by cohesion policy;
Amendment 170 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 6. Highlights that the same safety and security standards should apply to all kinds of passenger and goods transport at EU level and calls for a proposal to fund safety and security obligations, bearing in mind that, particularly in the case of maritime and air transport, international coordination is a prerequisite, and that current safety rules should be reviewed and/or replaced by 2015;
Amendment 171 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses the importance of alternative and renewable energies for transport and highlights that the set goals could be reached
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses the importance of alternative and renewable energies for transport and highlights that the set goals could be reached using an energy mix and existing methods for saving energy, accompanied by the requisite infrastructure; relevant policies to incentivise their production and their use need to be adopted;
Amendment 173 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 174 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses the importance of alternative and renewable energies for transport and in particular for long-haul air transport to which there is no alternative, and highlights that the set goals could be reached using an energy mix and existing methods for saving energy, accompanied by the requisite infrastructure; in this respect, calls for a European strategy to be presented on the development of new- generation biofuels for all modes of transport, which should be supported by appropriate European financing and by measures to encourage the private sector to invest in current and future research, development and marketing projects for advanced biofuels;
Amendment 175 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 7. Stresses the importance of alternative
Amendment 176 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 (new) Accepts, however, that not only is it not within the EU’s competence, but it is both unrealistic and undesirable for the EU to try to enforce a phase out of conventionally fuelled cars from city centres by 2050;
Amendment 177 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 (new) Emphasises that the set goals could be reached using an energy mix that dispenses with nuclear energy and existing methods for saving energy, accompanied by the requisite infrastructure;
Amendment 178 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Calls for existing solutions for CO2 to be used and future reduction goals to be formulated without giving preference to any particular type of technology;
Amendment 179 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new) 7 a. Recalls that the ‘user pays’ and ‘polluter pays’ principles should be implemented for all modes and for freight and passenger transport equally; insists that the internalisation of external costs of transport should include strict earmarking rules to reduce those specific costs;
Amendment 18 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) E a. whereas it is essential to ensure the successful development of the Trans- European Transport Network (TEN-T), effectively link the transport networks of all EU regions and eliminate the disparities between the levels of infrastructure development in the EU Member States,
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Calls for action to be taken to ensure that EU interregional cooperation programmes have sufficient visibility and funding, since they form an integral part of the EU's cohesion policy and play an important role in the implementation of EU policy in relation to macro-regional strategies, helping the EU Member States effectively to meet shared challenges such as guaranteeing better transport connections;
Amendment 180 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 bis (new) 7 bis. Stresses the fact that the Commission must have a global and coherent strategy on renewable energy, taking account of manufacture, supply and usage; points out that the transport sector is just a link in a chain and can only use the energy made available to it;
Amendment 181 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Requests, by 2015, a proposal on urban mobility in which, whilst respecting the principle of subsidiarity, support for projects is made conditional upon the submission of sustainable urban mobility plans which provide for efficient passenger and goods logistics chains, contribute to a reduction in traffic volumes, accidents, impact on climate change and environmental pollution (atmospheric pollution and noise), comply with the standards and targets of European transport policy and are coherent with regard to surrounding towns and regions;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8.
Amendment 183 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Requests, by 2015, a proposal on urban mobility in which, whilst respecting the principle of subsidiarity, support for projects is made conditional upon the submission of urban mobility plans which provide for efficient passenger and goods logistics chains, contribute to a reduction in traffic volumes and environmental pollution (atmospheric pollution and noise), ensure a higher level of safety in road traffic, comply with the standards of European transport policy and are coherent with regard to surrounding towns and regions, calls for an exchange of best practice for particularly successful examples of tailor-made sustainable concepts for urban mobility;
Amendment 184 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Requests, by 2015, a proposal on urban mobility in which, whilst respecting the principle of subsidiarity, support for projects is made conditional upon the submission of urban mobility plans which provide for efficient passenger and goods logistics chains, contribute to a reduction in traffic volumes and environmental pollution (atmospheric pollution and noise), comply with the standards of European transport policy and are coherent with regard to surrounding towns and regions; stresses the importance of innovation and research for example on aerodynamics and the use of electronic vehicles for an efficient and environmental friendly urban mobility;
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Requests, by 2015, a proposal
Amendment 186 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Requests, by 2015, a proposal on urban mobility
Amendment 187 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 8. Requests, by 2015, a proposal on urban mobility, achieved with the participation of the local authorities of Member States, and in which, whilst respecting the principle of subsidiarity, support for projects is made conditional upon the submission of urban mobility plans which provide for efficient passenger and goods logistics chains, contribute to a reduction in traffic volumes and environmental pollution (atmospheric pollution and noise), comply with the standards of European transport policy and are coherent with regard to surrounding towns and regions;
Amendment 188 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Asserts that sustainable multi- modality for passengers and goods logistics needs the provision of intermodal connection points and terminals, integrated planning and logistics, as well as integrated education and vocational training;
Amendment 189 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Is convinced that reaching CO2-free city logistics could only be possible by through a collaborative approach and consistent dialogue between local authorities and stakeholders (representing passenger and freight transport); insists that urban transport policies should not create new internal market barriers for passenger and goods transport;
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) E a. whereas the targets for modal transfers cannot be achieved by legislation, but only by a functioning infrastructure, intrinsic advantages and strengths and incentives,
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Opposes the establishment of the Connecting Europe facility in its proposed form; considers the cohesion policy to be a tried-and-tested tool for the financing of infrastructure projects in the EU's less developed Member States; believes that the financing of key infrastructure projects must remain the primary responsibility of Member States, or rather of the market with the involvement of the private sector;
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 bis (new) 8 bis. Urban mobility will be applied to urban and/or built-up areas;
Amendment 191 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new) 8 a. Stresses the need to promote an environmentally friendly fleet for urban and suburban public transport and calls on the Commission and the Member States to support projects meant to ensure intermodality between the public transport system and other transport types (e.g. cycling);
Amendment 192 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable
Amendment 193 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that
Amendment 194 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable and physically active means of transport, where
Amendment 195 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable means of transport, where proposals should be made by 2013 to develop infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists in towns, to double the number of passengers on public transport, which mainly uses alternative sources of energy, and to establish e- tickets, including integrated pricing management systems, for multi-modal travel, and where pricing policy should be considered as an incentive;
Amendment 196 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable means of transport, where proposals should be made by 2013 to develop infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists in towns, to double the number of passengers on public transport, which mainly uses alternative sources of energy, and to establish e-tickets for multi-modal travel, and where pricing policy should be considered as an incentive; sustainable urban passenger transport patterns need to be based on public transport and multi-modal solutions for increased mobility for all citizens as well as improved social inclusion;
Amendment 197 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable means of transport
Amendment 198 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable means of transport, where proposals should be made by 2013 to develop infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists in towns, with the aim of doubling the number of same, to double the number of passengers on public transport, which mainly uses alternative sources of energy, and to establish e-tickets for multi-modal travel, and where pricing policy should be considered as an
Amendment 199 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable means of transport, where proposals should be made by 2013 to develop infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists in towns, to double the number of passengers on public transport, which mainly uses alternative sources of energy, and to establish e-tickets for multi-modal travel when technically and legally feasible, and where pricing policy should be considered as an incentive;
Amendment 2 #
Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new) - having regard to the Commission’s communication entitled ‘Towards fair and efficient pricing in transport’ of 1995 and whereas the Commission should republish its communication ‘transport and CO2’ COM(98)0204,
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 20 #
Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new) E a. recognising that in urban areas a strategy of modal shift to public transport, cycling and walking is essential in order to tackle congestion and reduce pollution levels,
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that urban transport services are covered by the subsidiarity principle; stresses, nevertheless, that European cooperation, coordination and funding would enable local authorities to meet the challenges they are facing
Amendment 200 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable means of transport, where proposals should be made by 2013 to develop initiatives that promote behavioural changes, especially among young people, and develop infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists in towns, to double the number of passengers on public
Amendment 201 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable means of transport, where proposals should be made by 2013 to develop infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists in towns, to double the number of passengers on public transport, which mainly uses alternative sources of energy, and to establish e-tickets for multi-modal travel, and where pricing policy should be considered as an incentive; would like to recall that accessibility linked to affordability of transport is crucial for social mobility, and that reconciling sustainability aims with social needs should be given greater attention when planning transport policy of the future;
Amendment 202 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable means of transport, where proposals should be made by 2013 to develop infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists in towns, with particular emphasis on innovative systems such as cable transport, and to double the number of passengers on public transport, which mainly uses alternative sources of energy
Amendment 203 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable, physically active and safe means of transport and mobility, where proposals should be made by 2013 to develop infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists in towns with the goal of doubling the numbers of pedestrians and cyclists by 2020, to double the number of passengers on public transport, which mainly uses alternative sources of energy, and to establish e-tickets for multi-modal travel, and where pricing policy should be considered as an incentive;
Amendment 204 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 9. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable means of transport, where proposals should be made by 2013 to develop infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists in towns, to double the number of passengers on public transport, which mainly uses alternative sources of energy,
Amendment 205 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 bis (new) 9 bis. In order to promote the combination of transport modes, it would be advisable to draw up a single transport document in electronic format and to establish the appropriate framework for use of the ITS;
Amendment 206 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 bis (new) 9 bis. Stresses the importance of establishing the use of e-tickets for multi- modal travel, and in particular to encourage the development of an integrated ticketing system in rail transport along the lines of air transport; proposes that this process be undertaken to take account of what is legally and technically feasible; calls for integrated ticketing systems to be implemented while guaranteeing a fair and effective system of liability, rights of recourse and compensation as well as certainty of law, transparency and user information; calls for the Commission to make proposals in this respect by the end of 2012;
Amendment 207 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes that the basic rules on passenger rights should be laid down in a Charter of Passengers’ Rights for all forms of transport, and therefore expects, by 2013, such a proposal which takes into account both the specific characteristics of
Amendment 208 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes that the basic rules on passenger rights should be laid down in a Charter of Passengers’ Rights for all forms of transport, and therefore expects, by 2013, such a proposal which takes into account the specific characteristics of carriers and past experience, while the rights of disabled passengers should be covered by a separate chapter in the Charter;
Amendment 209 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes that the basic rules on passenger rights should be laid down in a Charter of Passengers’ Rights for all forms of transport, and therefore expects, by 201
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the transport sector is subject to many persistent historical and geographic obstacles (different track widths or the impregnable barriers of mountain ranges such as the Alps, the Pyrenees or the Carpathians) that produce ‘frontier effects’, which can often be easily remedied and should therefore all be reduced,
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Points out that urban transport services are covered by the subsidiarity principle; stresses, nevertheless, that European cooperation, coordination and funding would enable local authorities to meet the challenges they are facing; underlines the importance of interregional and cross- border cooperation with regard to the development of transport networks; urges that solutions be pinpointed for reducing transport fuel consumption at local level via the use of new intelligent and clean technologies;
Amendment 210 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes that the basic rules on passenger rights should be laid down in a Charter of Passengers’ Rights for all forms of transport, and therefore expects, by 2013, such a proposal which takes into account the specific characteristics of carriers
Amendment 211 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes that the basic rules on passenger rights should be laid down in a Charter of Passengers’ Rights for all forms of transport, responding to the needs of the disabled, and therefore expects, by 2013, such a proposal which takes into account the specific characteristics of carriers and past experience;
Amendment 212 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes that the basic rules on passenger rights should be laid down in a Charter of Passengers’ Rights for all forms of transport, and therefore expects, by 2013, such a proposal which takes into account the specific characteristics of carriers and past experience; would like to stress the importance of addressing in EU legislation the emerging phenomenon of add-on charges imposed on passengers by airlines, as the current situation undermines the principle of price transparency;
Amendment 213 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 10. Believes that the basic rules on passenger rights should be laid down in a Charter of Passengers’ Rights for all forms of transport, and therefore expects, by 2013, such a proposal which takes into account the specific characteristics of carriers and past experience; stresses in this respect the need to establish clear definitions, uniformly interpreted by all operators according to the modes of transport, concerning in particular the ‘level of assistance and care’ given to passengers, their rights of recourse, and the ‘extraordinary circumstances’ entitling compensation;
Amendment 214 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls to conclude mutual recognition agreements on customs and security programmes between the EU and third-countries, in particular EU-US agreements should be a priority;
Amendment 215 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 bis (new) 10 bis. Calls for a proposal for investment in innovative formulas for developing employment in the transport sector for disabled people;
Amendment 216 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new) 10 a. Calls for European guidelines clarifying the air transport passenger rights (EU 261) and the enforcement and interpretation of different national enforcement bodies with regard to EU 261;
Amendment 217 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 b (new) 10 b. Considers that a new security certificate is not needed when AEO status aims to ensure security for the entire supply chain; additional operational benefits would make AEO status more attractive;
Amendment 218 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 ter (new) 10 ter. Underlines the importance of material, infrastructure and services needs that require attention for the disabled;
Amendment 219 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 c (new) 10 c. Calls for guidelines clarifying the ‘level of assistance and care’ , the right of redress and the definition of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ in air transport;
Amendment 22 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F F. whereas the transport sector
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 а (new) 3а. Considers that the macro-regions and the strategies for their development have the potential to play a more active role in the implementation of a coordinated, effective and sustainable transport policy;
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – introductory part Amendment 221 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – introductory part 11. Calls for a research and development programme which is specifically aimed at sustainable and safe mobility to be established and financially supported, with the aim of:
Amendment 222 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – introductory part 11. Calls for a research and development programme which is specifically aimed at mobility to be established with a specific transposition strategy and timeline and financially supported, with the aim of:
Amendment 223 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – introductory part 11.
Amendment 224 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 1 Amendment 225 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 1 – maintaining the EU’s leadership as a production and research centre for all forms of transport, the priorities of which are lower emissions in the sector, a better logistics chain, safety and better traffic management;
Amendment 226 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 1 bis (new) - a research and development programme to be implemented and given financial support;
Amendment 227 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 2 – creating intelligent, interoperational and linked systems
Amendment 228 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 2 – creating intelligent, interoperational and linked systems for transport guidance, supporting SESAR, Galileo, ERTMS, PIDS, SafeSeaNet, LRIT and ITS
Amendment 229 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 2 – creating intelligent, interoperational and linked systems for transport guidance, supporting SESAR, Galileo, ERTMS, PIDS, SafeSeaNet, River Information Services, LRIT und ITS and providing the required funding;
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) F a. whereas specific transposition measures are required for the development of the European transport policy, and thus in future, for the purposes of intelligent regulation in the European Union1, the focus must also be very strongly directed at consistent transposition and monitoring, __________________ 1 COM(2010)543 final
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls the need to disseminate best practices in the field of transport so as to encourage an innovative and sustainable approach to transport in urban, suburban and rural areas;
Amendment 230 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 2 –
Amendment 231 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 2 – creating intelligent, interoperational and linked systems for transport guidance, supporting SESAR, Galileo, GMES, ERTMS, PIDS, SafeSeaNet, LRIT
Amendment 232 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 2 a (new) - to develop concepts and systems that contribute to transport volume reduction and avoidance;
Amendment 233 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 2 a (new) - implementing the proposed technology roadmap in cooperation with all relevant stakeholders in order to understand the needs of the sector and better attribute EU funding accordingly; priority should be given to projects which decarbonise transport, increase the transparency of the supply chain, improve transport safety and security, improve traffic management and reduce administrative burdens; - stresses the need for reliable tracking systems which nurture trust in eCommerce;
Amendment 234 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 2 a (new) - finding practice-oriented solutions with the participation of a group of experts from the fields of economics, science, politics and society;
Amendment 235 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 – indent 2 b (new) - continuing the e-safety initiative to increase road traffic safety and establish the infrastructure for the introduction of the e-call emergency call system while respecting data protection requirements;
Amendment 236 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 bis (new) 11 bis. Stresses the importance of effective, efficient interoperability for the adequate development of modal transport;
Amendment 237 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that bureaucratic hurdles should be reduced for all forms of transport and calls, therefore, for the increased harmonisation of transport documents,
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that bureaucratic hurdles should be reduced for all forms of transport and calls, therefore, for the increased harmonisation of transport documents,
Amendment 239 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that bureaucratic hurdles should be reduced for all forms of transport and calls, therefore, for the increased harmonisation of transport documents
Amendment 24 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) F a. whereas it is essential to ensure efficient connections between the EU Member States and Europe’s external borders,
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Recalls the importance of drawing up, planning and implementing joint transport infrastructure strategies at cross-border level, whether they relate to major freight corridors and trans- European transport networks or simply to regional, local and urban transport management in line with catchment areas and population; highlights the importance of European territorial cooperation in achieving these coordinated strategies, and the urgency of certain cross-border investments; calls for all macro-regional coordination to include an in-depth study of transport integration as part of its strategy, in order to achieve genuine social and territorial cohesion;
Amendment 240 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that bureaucratic hurdles should be reduced for all forms of transport and calls, therefore, for the increased harmonisation of transport documents, particularly for goods transport by road, and for the submission, by 2013, of a proposal on the standardisation of freight documents, and a more business-friendly EU attestation form for non-driving days;
Amendment 241 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that bureaucratic hurdles should be reduced for all forms of transport
Amendment 242 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 12. Considers that bureaucratic hurdles should be reduced for all forms of transport and calls, therefore, for
Amendment 243 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Stresses that obstacles at border points to the efficient flow of road freight transport between the EU Member States, particularly those on the EU’s eastern border and neighbouring countries, should be removed; underlines that simplifying border crossing procedures would cut time and costs;
Amendment 244 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 12 a (new) 12 a. Recognises that low emission / green zones can make an important contribution to improving air quality in urban areas, but cities should have the freedom to design and implement schemes based on their unique circumstances; believes that a central information point for all schemes across the EU should be promoted to enable effective journey planning and a good example would be the expansion of http://www.lowemissionzones.eu and include road pricing zones;
Amendment 245 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses the need for the improvement and standardisation of control devices, such as speed cameras, on-board units and communications systems and media, and calls for the submission, by 2013, of a proposal for the mutual recognition and interoperability of such devices with a view to ensuring better convergence in the application of traffic safety standards using a number of comparable methods and practices;
Amendment 247 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 13. Stresses the need for the improvement and standardisation of control devices and their common licensing, such as speed cameras, on-board units and communications systems and media, and calls for the submission, by 2013, of a proposal for the mutual recognition and interoperability of such devices;
Amendment 248 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 a (new) 13 a. Stresses the importance of enhanced coordination and cooperation between the national authorities in cross-border prosecutions in the case of traffic offences in order to provide more safety and coherence in European road traffic;
Amendment 249 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13 bis (new) 13 bis. Calls on the Commission to present a proposal for the compulsory introduction of speed regulators with limits of 120 km/h for light commercial vehicles and 80 km/h for heavy vehicles with a view to improving road safety and reducing CO2 emissions;
Amendment 25 #
Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new) F a. whereas differences among regions in Europe (peripheral situation, infrastructure, landscape, population density, socio-economic situation) pose very different problems and need flexibility regarding solutions,
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Considers that an efficient European transport network requires substantial financing and the availability of a wide range of public and private sources of financing; to that end, calls for emphasis to be placed on the importance of public- private partnerships; considers that the EIB should be more closely involved in the financing of TEN-T infrastructure;
Amendment 250 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the fact that direct improvements to, and the standardisation of, loading units and the dimensions of transport vehicles would optimise multi- modal transport; loading units used in global transport should be taken into account;
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the fact that direct improvements to, and the standardisation of, loading units and the dimensions of transport vehicles would optimise multi- modal transport; points out that new dimensions and weights of motorised vehicles must conform to the principle of cost transparency and must not entail any additional investments for the adaptation of road infrastructure;
Amendment 252 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the fact that
Amendment 253 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the fact that direct improvements to, and the standardisation of, loading units and the dimensions of transport vehicles would optimise multi- modal transport; at the same time, standard loading units used in global transport should be taken into account;
Amendment 254 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the fact that direct improvements to, and the standardisation of, loading units and the dimensions of transport vehicles would optimise multi- modal transport; stresses that the European Commission should promote the use of LHVs in cross-border transport to achieve CO2 reduction and an optimalisation of transport;
Amendment 255 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 14. Highlights the fact that
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Notes that some opportunities for emission reductions in transport have not been exploited so far; for instance the case of EMS (European Modular System) or the development of new loading units and aerodynamic devices;
Amendment 257 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Stresses that certain more cost- effective options for the reduction of traffic emissions such as EMS (European Modular System) or other developments of new charging units and aerodynamic devices have not yet been fully exploited;
Amendment 258 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 bis (new) 14 bis. Underlines the importance of the various European transport agencies and calls for fresh impetus to strengthen their European dimension;
Amendment 259 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new) 14 a. Calls on Member States to support and work towards a level playing field between all modes of transport in terms of energy taxation and Value Added Tax (VAT);
Amendment 26 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. Stresses that EU citizens and enterprises are direct beneficiaries of a single European transport area, which has as its objective the reduction of times and of the resources allocated to goods and passenger transport, and a closer integration of the markets;
Amendment 260 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 ter (new) 14 ter. Supports the use of Eurobonds to finance the transport infrastructure needed to complete the TEN-Ts;
Amendment 261 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 quater (new) 14 quater. Taking into account the fact that the local and regional bodies have significant competences in the area of transport policy, it is essential for them to be able to participate through a multi- level governance approach;
Amendment 262 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 1 Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 1 Amendment 264 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 1 – social regulation on road transport to be amended to allow more flexibility whilst maintaining a safe approach to drivers rest hours; calls for another review of the rules on driving and rest times for passenger and goods transport, and the implementation thereof, by 2014
Amendment 265 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 1 –
Amendment 266 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 1 – another review of the rules on driving and rest times for passenger and goods transport, and the implementation thereof, by 2014, taking account of the European Parliament’s proposals on harmonisation between Member States of the penalties applying in the event of serious contravention of the social regulations in road transport;
Amendment 267 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 1 – another review of the rules on driving and rest times for passenger and goods transport, and the implementation thereof, by 2014, stresses that regarding the rules on driving and rest times uniform and fair enforcement with the emphasis on harmonisation of national systems in the EU is needed;
Amendment 268 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 1 – another review of the rules on driving and rest times for passenger and goods transport, and the implementation thereof, by 2014; in particular the scope for judgment of the enforcement officers has to be increased to prevent the prosecution of offences that are evidently caused by forces majeure;
Amendment 269 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 1 – another review of the rules on driving and rest times for passenger and goods transport, and the implementation thereof, by 2014, considers that drivers of long- distance goods vehicles should be able to take weekly breaks at home, without compromising road safety objectives; believes that it is also necessary to harmonise the restrictions on goods transport journeys throughout the European Union;
Amendment 27 #
Motion for a resolution Recital G G. whereas the liberalisation of transport markets should go hand in hand with quality services, training and employment and it should be borne in mind with further proposals for market liberalisation that responsibility and risks are shared equally by all participants in the value- added chain,
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that
Amendment 270 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 1 – another review of the r
Amendment 271 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 1 – another review of the rules on driving and rest times for passenger
Amendment 272 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 1 a (new) - the Working Time Directive for mobile workers to be clarified, especially in its definition of duty-time and time not spent specifically in control of a vehicle;
Amendment 273 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 2 Amendment 274 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 2 Amendment 275 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 2 –
Amendment 276 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 2 –
Amendment 277 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 2 – a 40% increase in the number of secure parking spaces for heavy goods vehicles on the Trans-European Road Network (TERN) in each Member State compared with 2010 figures;
Amendment 278 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 2 – a 40% increase in the number of secure parking spaces for heavy goods vehicles on the Trans-European Road Network (TERN) in each Member State compared with 2010 figures;
Amendment 279 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 2 – a 40% increase in the number of parking spaces for heavy goods vehicles on the Trans-European Road Network (TERN) in each Member State compared with 2010 figures, taking safety and hygiene standards in particular into account;
Amendment 28 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the EU should set coherent standards for all carriers, with particular regard to safety, technology, environmental protection and working conditions,
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that cities suffer most from congestion and air and noise pollution; in this context believes that cities can make a major contribution towards combating climate change through intelligent local public transport systems and sustainable city-district planning, including building of bicycle paths; calls for transport arrangements between cities and the countryside to be improved; takes the view that the areas of environmental and health protection should be given a predominant role and should be put before internal market interests;
Amendment 280 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 2 – a
Amendment 281 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 2 – a 40% increase, compared with 2010 figures, in the number of secure parking spaces for heavy goods vehicles on the Trans-European Road Network (TERN) in
Amendment 282 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 2 – a
Amendment 283 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 2 – by 2015, a
Amendment 284 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 2 a (new) - to fix EU co-funding for road infrastructure at maximum 20% of the total EU transport co-funding;
Amendment 285 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 3 Amendment 286 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 3 – the Commission to support Member State initiatives to create a safe and environmentally friendly fleet by
Amendment 287 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 3 – the Commission to support Member State initiatives to create a safe and environmentally friendly fleet by means of tax incentives, which exclusively contains vehicles with a registration demonstrating that the infrastructure will not be permanently destroyed;
Amendment 288 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 3 – the Commission to support Member State initiatives to create a safe and environmentally friendly fleet, including motorised and non-motorised two- and three-wheeled vehicles, and to encourage its periodical renewal by means of tax incentives, green tendering, etc.;
Amendment 289 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 3 – the Commission to support Member State initiatives to create a safe and environmentally friendly fleet by means of tax incentives, amending Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection (2001/C37/03) in order to extend their scope to recently manufactured vehicles with particulate filters, in addition to vehicles produced in the future;
Amendment 29 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the EU should set coherent standards for all carriers, with particular regard to safety, technology, environmental protection and working conditions, in order to call for them at global level also, while at the same time maintaining full market harmonisation,
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Notes that cities suffer most from congestion and air and noise pollution; in this context believes that cities can make a major contribution towards combating climate change through intelligent local public transport systems and sustainable city-district planning, including building of bicycle paths; calls for transport arrangements between cities and the countryside to be improved; points out that traffic congestion in urban and peri-urban areas results in higher fuel consumption costs and an increase in pollutant emissions;
Amendment 290 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 3 a (new) - a rapid cancellation of all restrictions on cabotage in order to facilitate economically and ecologically optimum usage of the transport vehicles and to avoid unnecessary empty runs as far as possible, accompanied by a harmonisation of the social provisions in order to prevent wage dumping and guarantee fair competition;
Amendment 291 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 3 bis (new) - the presentation of a comprehensive innovation plan to promote efficiency, sustainability and job creation;
Amendment 292 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 – an improvement in the initial and further training of persons employed in the transport sector, and in access to those professions, in order, on the one hand, to harmonise working conditions and salaries
Amendment 293 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 – an improvement in the initial and further training of persons employed in the transport sector, and in access to those professions
Amendment 294 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 – an improvement in the initial and further training of persons employed in the transport sector, including the treatment of, and assistance for, the disabled, and in access to those professions, in order to harmonise working conditions and salaries
Amendment 295 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 – an improvement in the initial and further training of persons employed in the transport sector, and in access to those professions, in order to harmonise working conditions
Amendment 296 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 – an improvement in the initial and further training of persons employed in the transport sector, and in access to those professions, in order to harmonise working conditions and salaries; full and standardised training of those carrying out controls on the roads and motorways of the Member States in order to ensure uniform and effective application of EU rules;
Amendment 297 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 – an improvement in the initial and further training of persons employed in the
Amendment 298 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – subparagraph 1 (new) - measures to ensure that an agreement on a social code for mobile transport workers, addressing the problem of disguised self-employment is solved before the elimination of remaining restrictions on cabotage is pursued;
Amendment 299 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 bis (new) - the Commission to present proposals for removing the current cabotage restrictions on passenger and goods transport by the end of 2013;
Amendment 3 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas European transport policy
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 30 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H H. whereas the EU should set coherent standards for all carriers, with particular regard to safety, technology, environmental protection and working conditions,
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Returns once again to the issue of the fight against climate change, specifically in connection with the directive designed to include greenhouse gas emissions from civil aviation in the Community scheme for emission allowance trading and its probable extension to the maritime transport sector, which may lead to an increase in direct and indirect transport costs, transport being a crucial sector for the flow of people and goods in the outermost regions;
Amendment 300 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 a (new) - an EU standardised methodology to calculate the carbon footprint of transport and logistics operations to avoid a proliferation of national approaches and support for industry initiatives to promote carbon footprint calculation especially for road freight transport;
Amendment 301 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 a (new) - a roadmap for further completion of the internal market in the area of transport i.e. with regard to cabotage;
Amendment 302 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 a (new) - the elimination of the restrictions on cabotage, as these lead to a distortion of the internal market;
Amendment 303 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 bis (new) - a specific regulation for recreational vehicles, taking into account that this group is on the increase;
Amendment 304 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 bis (new) - as part of the future proposal on the liberalisation of road haulage, the Commission to take account of the specific nature of the road sector as a mobile activity that must be able to be pursued without distorting competition in the different Member States of the European Union;
Amendment 305 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 a (new) - a solution to the fact that modular road trains cannot cross country boarders, and that this is detrimental for an increased use of this method of road transport;
Amendment 306 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 a (new) - by 2013, the submission of a ‘Walking and Cycling Master Plan’, whereby, from 2014, at least 15% of EU co-funding should be invested in non-motorised carriers;
Amendment 307 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 – indent 4 ter (new) - the Commission to present proposals for permitting longer heavier vehicles (LHVs) on European roads by the end of 2013;
Amendment 308 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 1 – a proposal on the ‘Blue Belt’, and its importance to the maritime economy, particularly in developing the potential of motorways of the sea and in creating strategic hubs, which are fundamental to intra- and inter-European trade;
Amendment 309 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 1 – a proposal on the ‘Blue Belt’, providing for specific and effective rules on the transport of hazardous goods;
Amendment 31 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H bis (new) H bis. whereas there is still no effective authority in the internal market and it is necessary to create a genuine Single European Transport Area, eliminating all of the barriers between transport modes and national systems, simplifying the integration process and facilitating the emergence of multinational and multimodal operators. In order to avoid distortions, the strategy must ensure consistency and monitoring of the implementation of the provisions as regards the social aspects, safety, environmental protection, and minimum service standards and users’ rights, paying special attention to the disabled,
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Highlights the special needs of islands, in terms of efficient mainland connections and the application of the Transport Equivalent principle, the specificities of outermost regions and the pivotal importance of the short sea shipping and inland waterways as fields where unused potential exists for the further development of the internal market and the achievement of Cohesion Policy goals;
Amendment 310 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 1 – a proposal on the ‘Blue Belt’ by 2013, to facilitate the formalities for ships operating between EU ports and achieve a real single market for intra-EU maritime transport;
Amendment 311 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 1 – a proposal on the ‘Blue Belt’, which guarantees that the supplementation by ‘blue waterways’ only takes place with compliance with existing environmental and nature conservation legislation;
Amendment 312 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 1 – a proposal on the ‘Blue Belt’, on the basis of a full evaluation of its implementation by Member States;
Amendment 313 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 1 – a proposal on the ‘Blue Belt’ and subsequent creation of a solid maritime services system accompanied by fresh impetus for the motorways of the sea, highlighting the importance of boats as real mobile infrastructure;
Amendment 314 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 1 a (new) - the introduction of a European policy for short and medium sea shipping, in order to use the spare capacity of inland waterways and to achieve the EU objectives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the transport sector;
Amendment 315 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 1 a (new) - initiatives to ensure that reduction of sulphur emissions from ships does not result in backward modal shift;
Amendment 316 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 2 –
Amendment 317 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 2 – continuing support for the NAIADES programme, with a
Amendment 318 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 2 – continuing support for the NAIADES programme
Amendment 319 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 2 – continuing support for the NAIADES programme, with a
Amendment 32 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) H a. stresses the positive experiences several Member States have with the use of the European Modular System, that this is a sustainable road transport solution which contributes to a higher energy efficiency level in the road transport sector,
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Considers it important to establish alternative inter-regional goods and passenger transport plans for crisis scenarios arising from natural disasters;
Amendment 320 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 2 – continuing support for the NAIADES programme
Amendment 321 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 2 – continuing support for the NAIADES programme, with an assessment of its success to be carried out in 2013, following its expiry, and
Amendment 322 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 2 bis (new) - the importance of the shipping sector to be seen in a strategic light and, based on the proposals set out, for the introduction of a programme to promote and help finance innovative projects aimed at reducing emissions, protecting the environment and improving energy efficiency;
Amendment 323 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 3 – a proposal on a 20% increase in the number of multi-modal connections (platforms) for inland waterways, inland ports and rail transport by 2020, compared with 2010 figures, and corresponding financial support, and therefore the extension beyond 2013 of the Marco Polo programme, given its importance to multi- modal transport and the development of shipping lanes;
Amendment 324 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 3 – a proposal on a
Amendment 325 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 3 – for the efficient usage of the potential for shipping, a proposal on a 20% increase in the number of multi-modal connections (platforms) for inland waterways, inland ports and rail transport by 2020, compared with 2010 figures, the expansion of multimodal corridors and corresponding financial support for these projects;
Amendment 326 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 3 – a proposal on a
Amendment 327 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 3 bis (new) - consideration to be given to the EMSA’s instruments to help find a solution to the piracy problem;
Amendment 328 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 4 Amendment 329 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 4 – the dedication of
Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new) H a. taking into account that the EU’s goal has long been to encourage a modal shift to more freight on the seas and less on the roads,
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. considers that the conversion of ports into genuine comodal hubs for transport by land and water will lead to regional business platforms springing up which, besides their logistics functions will become an ideal location, in the respective regions, for enterprises and industries seeking to be close to their market and European sea transport corridors;
Amendment 330 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 4 – the dedication of at least 10% of TEN-T funding to inland waterway projects and sea ports;
Amendment 331 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 4 –
Amendment 332 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 4 – the dedication of at least 10% of TEN-T funding to
Amendment 333 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 4 – the dedication of at least 1
Amendment 334 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 4 – the dedication of at least 10% of TEN-T funding to inland waterway projects and connections with dry ports and logistics platforms;
Amendment 335 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 4 – the dedication of at least
Amendment 336 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 4 – the dedication of at least
Amendment 337 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 4 – the dedication of at least
Amendment 338 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 4 – the dedication of at least
Amendment 339 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 5 – the harmonisation of training in shipping with an international standard by 2012, in view of the international nature of maritime transport, and the submission of a proposal on the mutual recognition of
Amendment 34 #
Motion for a resolution Recital H bis (new) H bis. whereas the EU is currently at the forefront in developing systems, infrastructure and other industrial sectors related to mobility, transport and logistics, and showing increasing leadership in other emerging areas through significant investment and firm commitment to the development of transport and mobility, urgent efforts are needed to maintain the EU’s capacity to compete and innovate in fundamental areas that could be at risk, such as reduction of environmental impact, safety, passengers’ rights, social and working conditions, etc. through the necessary investment and future-oriented policies,
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Emphasises that the potential of inland waterways transport has yet to be fully harnessed and that this has an increasingly important role to play in linking European regions and seas, and in developing hinterland regions;
Amendment 340 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 5 – the harmonisation of training in shipping with an international standard by 2012, in view of the international nature of maritime transport, and the submission of a proposal on the mutual recognition of framework conditions on training for port workers before the end of 2013, as well as a strategy for recruiting junior staff for maritime professions;
Amendment 341 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 5 –
Amendment 342 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 5 bis (new) - the extension of the principle of eco- bonuses to the motorways of the sea, providing incentives for a reduction in emissions achieved through maritime transport of road vehicles;
Amendment 343 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 5 bis (new) - in relation to TEN funds, attention to be paid to the need to increase the multimodal connections between sea ports and rail and road transport;
Amendment 344 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 5 a (new) - the Commission to draw up and submit a proposal for an integrated common policy on the EU’s inland waterways similar to the EU common maritime policy, to include development of inland transport services and ways of connecting them with other transport modes, development of the areas surrounding inland waterways, protection of water environment, etc.;
Amendment 345 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 5 bis (new) - the extension of the principle of eco- bonuses to the motorways of the sea, providing incentives for a reduction in emissions achieved through maritime transport of road vehicles;
Amendment 346 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 Amendment 347 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 Amendment 348 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 Amendment 349 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 Amendment 35 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 1 – that, by 2013, the Commission should make specific proposals, on the basis of the report on European road safety 2011-2020, to reduce the number of deaths and severe injuries on the roads by 50% in relation to 2010
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Notes that shipping industry has an important role in connecting the eastern and western parts and central and peripheral regions of the EU, calls to ensure that while following the initiatives on reduction of the emissions (greenhouse gases, sulphur etc) the backward modal shift is avoided;
Amendment 350 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 – the Commission to submit a proposal for rules governing
Amendment 351 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 – the Commission to
Amendment 352 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 – the Commission to
Amendment 353 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 – the Commission to submit a proposal for rules governing port services by 2014, with specific reference to technical-nautical services a regulation of market access and of their functioning is still necessary to safeguard the safety of navigation, the security and the environmental protection;
Amendment 354 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 – the Commission to submit a proposal for rules governing port services by 2014, on the basis of an in-depth evaluation of the guidelines set out in October 2007 on the European ports policy, and taking account of the implementation of national legislation on the subject, in particular on the mode of governance and operation of maritime ports;
Amendment 355 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 bis (new) - the introduction of effective rules on links between the islands and the rest of the continent, and clear guidelines on the public transport obligations in this area in order to overcome the obstacles imposed by isolation;
Amendment 356 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 bis (new) - the introduction of a real European policy for short and medium shipping, in order to permit a massive modal shift from road to sea transport and thus achieve the EU objectives for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the transport sector; - a European scheme to be studied and tested based on granting support for all ships using biofuel;
Amendment 357 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 a (new) - when specifying reduction goals for ships’ emissions, measures to avoid distortions of competition within the EU;
Amendment 358 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16 – indent 6 bis (new) - account to be taken, within the framework of liberalisation of port services, of the special characteristics of technical maritime services, which have a direct impact on sea transport safety and environmental protection; it is hoped that any future initiative by the Commission will be preceded by careful consultation of the parties involved and will be discussed with the full involvement of all of the relevant institutions;
Amendment 359 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 1 – a proposal, by 2015, on the c
Amendment 36 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 1 – that
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Stresses the need to strengthen the principle of 'territorial continuity', particularly for islands, mountain regions and outermost regions, adopting Community legislation and boosting funding for these regions in order to limit their isolation.
Amendment 360 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 1 – a proposal, by 201
Amendment 361 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 1 – a proposal, by 2015, on the creation of a single European airspace by further reducing functional airspace blocks, with the Member States also being called upon to promote the implementation of the single European airspace, and – current Single European Sky II fully implemented by 2016;
Amendment 362 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 1 – a proposal, by 2015, on the creation of a single European airspace by further reducing functional airspace blocks, with the Member States also being called upon to promote the implementation of the single European airspace; stresses that the deployment of SESAR through funding and governance is necessary in order to create the Single European Sky II;
Amendment 363 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 1 – a proposal
Amendment 364 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 1 –
Amendment 365 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 2 – service quality
Amendment 366 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 2 a (new) - the conclusion of mutual recognition agreements on customs and security programmes between the EU and third countries, with priority for EU-US agreements;
Amendment 367 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 Amendment 368 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 – the European Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 369 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 – the European Commission and the Member States to implement
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 1 – that, by 2013, the Commission should make specific proposals, on the basis of the report on European road safety 2011
Amendment 370 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 – the European Commission and the Member States to
Amendment 371 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 – the Member States to implement the European trade in emissions certificates by 2012, with reference also to international agreements; and calls on the European Commission to assure an international level playing field;
Amendment 372 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 – the
Amendment 373 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 a (new) - the Commission to strengthen coordination between the Single Sky Regulations and the SESAR and Galileo projects as well as the Clean Sky initiatives, to obtain more efficient energy and GHG emissions reduction measures;
Amendment 374 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 a (new) - actively work on the development of a ‘Checkpoint of the Future’ which not only looks at technology improvement but also at a risk based approach to facilitate the travel of the majority of passengers;
Amendment 375 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 bis (new) - TEN-T funds allocated to SESAR to be substantially increased in order to provide for deployment of the programme on time;
Amendment 376 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 bis (new) - the introduction of effective rules on links between the islands and the rest of the continent, and clear guidelines on the public transport obligations in this area in order to overcome the obstacles imposed by isolation;
Amendment 377 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 a (new) – the dedication of at least 20% of TEN-T funding to SESAR deployment; – active work on the development of a ‘Checkpoint of the Future’ which not only looks at technology improvement but also at a risk based approach to facilitate the travel of the majority of passengers;
Amendment 378 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 bis (new) - the Member States and the parties involved to work actively to develop an air safety system that incorporates better technology and speeds up and facilitates security checks for passengers;
Amendment 379 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 a (new) - a regulatory framework that allows for business predictability and for the increasing competitiveness of the sector, notably through adequate airport capacity;
Amendment 38 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 1 – that, by 2013, the Commission should make specific proposals, on the basis of the report on European road safety 2011-2020, to reduce the number of deaths
Amendment 380 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 – indent 3 ter (new) - air safety to be based on a previous risk analysis, particularly in relation to freight and post, and for it to be proportional to the risks involved in their transport;
Amendment 381 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new) 17 a. Stresses the importance of promoting electric vehicles for the reduction of emissions by the transport sector and calls on the Member States and the relevant European industries to contribute both to the promotion of electric vehicles and to the development of the necessary infrastructure for their use; highlights the potential of the development of this infrastructure to job creation at regional and local level;
Amendment 382 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 1 – the Commission to take Member States’ commitments in relation to local public transport and existing service levels into account when
Amendment 383 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 1 – the Commission to take Member States’ commitments in relation to local public transport and existing service levels into account when liberalising markets, with the aim of improving current service levels, while guaranteeing fair competition on the basis of a set of minimum social rules;
Amendment 384 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 1 – the Commission to take Member States’ commitments in relation to local public transport and existing service levels into account when liberalising markets, with the
Amendment 385 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 1 a (new) - with respect to improving safety in European train transport and for the purposes of establishing a common internal market, increasing promotion of technical harmonisation and interoperability between the different Member States, in particular where the European safety system ETCS is concerned, and for the European Railway Authority to be equipped with the necessary competences and resources to this end;
Amendment 386 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 1 bis (new) - harmonised regulation at European level as a result of the abundance of suburban transport and trams;
Amendment 387 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 1 a (new) - a Commission proposal for opening the domestic rail passenger transport market including amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007;
Amendment 388 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 1 bis (new) - real independence to be provided for the essential functions of access and charging for access to networks with respect to rail enterprises;
Amendment 389 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 2 – a
Amendment 39 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 1 – that, by 2013, the Commission should make specific proposals, on the basis of the report on European road safety 2011-2020, to reduce the number of deaths and severe injuries on the roads by 50% in relation to 2010, providing for specific actions, in addition to ITS systems, concerning road network maintenance, driving style and promotion of road safety awareness;
Amendment 390 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 2 – a harmonisation of the rules on
Amendment 391 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 2 – a harmonisation of the rules on vehicle registration by 2015, so that the
Amendment 392 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 2 – a harmonisation of the rules on vehicle
Amendment 393 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 – the independence and strengthening of national regulatory authorities, in the interest of more efficient railways
Amendment 394 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 – the independence and strengthening of
Amendment 395 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 – the independence and strengthening of national regulatory authorities, in the interest of more efficient railways, and the submission, by 2014, of a Commission proposal to further support this goal and to establish a European regulatory authority;
Amendment 396 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 a (new) - a boost of a well-conceived railway infrastructure, noise reduction and ERTMS action plan up to 2020 and next 2030, improving considerably co-funding by the EU;
Amendment 397 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 bis (new) - approval of the Commission’s decision to present, in 2012, a regulatory proposal on the opening-up of the domestic passenger transport market to competition and the splitting-up of historical infrastructure managers and railway operators;
Amendment 398 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 a (new) - inclusive national rail governance structures to ensure a high level of railway efficiency, in addition to opportunities to compete in international freight markets, to minimise public funding for the railways and even for the state to receive income from the railways;
Amendment 399 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 a (new) - greater consideration to be given to education and further training and to promotion of cross-border recognition of diplomas and qualifications;
Amendment 4 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas European transport policy directly affects EU citizens in many situations in daily life, and a Single European Transport Area benefits them considerably,
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that large divergences exist in terms of transport infrastructure and geographical accessibility on the one hand between the eastern and western parts of the EU and on the other hand between central and peripheral regions, which need to be
Amendment 40 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 1 – that, by 2013, the Commission should make specific proposals, on the basis of the report on European road safety 2011-2020, to reduce the number of deaths and severe injuries on the roads by 50% in relation to 2010, in particular by ensuring coherent harmonisation of road signs and road traffic rules by 2013 in the EU, including cross-border penalties, blood alcohol levels and speed limits in built-up areas;
Amendment 400 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 bis (new) - the Commission to take steps to ensure that Member States comply with measures requiring a reduction in the speed of goods trains carrying hazardous materials when passing through urban areas, and to take steps to standardise such measures, including traceability of trains carrying hazardous goods;
Amendment 401 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 bis (new) - the closure of one of the two places of work of the European Railway Agency;
Amendment 402 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 a (new) - inclusive national rail governance structures to ensure a high level of railway efficiency, in addition to opportunities to compete in international freight markets, to minimise public funding for the railways and even for the state to receive income from the railways;
Amendment 403 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – subparagraph 1 (new) - the targets already set to be met and for the priority projects in the Trans- European Road Network to be given fresh impetus;
Amendment 404 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 a (new) - the Commission to put forward a new proposal for the structural separation between service providers and the manager of the infrastructure in order to set the conditions for an efficient, transparent and attractive a future Single European rail area;
Amendment 405 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 a (new) - the opening of the competition to all railway services, including the provisions of domestic passenger services, together with the harmonisation of the national regulatory frameworks on rail infrastructure access;
Amendment 406 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – subparagraph 1 (new) - Member States to guarantee high standards for the training and licensing of drivers;
Amendment 407 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – indent 3 b (new) - the allocation of at least 40% of all EU co-funding in transport to railway projects;
Amendment 408 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 – subparagraph 2 (new) - the Commission to be provided by 2014 with a proposal regulating noise- differentiated track pricing directed at the uniform internalisation of railway noise costs and at the noise-abatement retrofitting of goods wagons in the European Member States, creating incentives for using the best noise- abatement material possible when building and rebuilding infrastructure;
Amendment 409 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 bis (new) 18 bis. Considers new European legislative initiatives in the field of transport unnecessary, yet stresses the need for correct implementation and enforcement of European legislation in all transport sectors and therefore requests that the Commission publish a summary of the enforcement of European transport legislation in the individual Member States by June 2012;
Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 1 a (new) - whereas the quality of road infrastructure, which has a direct impact on road safety, differs significantly across the EU and whereas more than 70 percent of road accident deaths in the Member States occur on the urban and rural roads, stresses that efficient financing from the Cohesion Fund into this type of infrastructure has to be further promoted in line with the principles of social and territorial cohesion and the goal of sustainable and safe transport;
Amendment 410 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 bis (new) 18 bis. Stresses, in view of the economic and environmental needs, the importance of truly European management of transport infrastructure (goods and passenger rail corridors, Single European Sky, ports and connections between them and the transport network, ‘Blue Belt’, inland waterways) in order to make the European Union more competitive and attractive and in order to guarantee the free and fluid movement of passengers and goods;
Amendment 411 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new) 18 a. Stresses that if a modal shift from road to sea is the EU’s top priority, the European Union must renounce decisions that will dramatically increase shipping costs;
Amendment 412 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 19. Calls on the Commission to annually assess the goals of the White Paper, progress made, and results, and to report to Parliament
Amendment 413 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 bis (new) 19 bis. Calls on the European Commission to identify, quantify and evaluate, in the impact studies of the legislative proposals, the creation of ‘ecological employment’ and measures to promote it;
Amendment 42 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 2 – that, by 2014,
Amendment 43 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 2 – that, by 2014, a proposal should be submitted to provide for the internalisation of the external costs of all modes of transport, whilst avoiding double charging and market distortions,
Amendment 44 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 2 – that, by 2014, a proposal should be submitted to provide for the internalisation of the external costs of all modes of transport, whilst avoiding double charging and market distortions, in order to increase investments in mobility, safety and research; in that respect, the internalisation of external costs of transport should only relate to the transport itself;
Amendment 45 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 2 – that, by 2014, a proposal should be submitted to provide for the internalisation of the external costs of all modes of transport, whilst avoiding double charging and market distortions, in order to increase investments in mobility, safety and research; such proposal should however take into account the specificity of each transport mode and recognize the already existing forms of mitigations (e.g. environment) and of financing (e.g. infrastructure);
Amendment 46 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 2 – that, by 2014, a proposal should be submitted to provide for the internalisation of the external costs of all modes of transport, whilst avoiding double charging and market distortions, in order to increase investments in mobility, safety and research; here, it is necessary to check, without preconceived notions, what type of costs will have to be charged to carriers and to what extent they are already bearing these (for example congestion costs in road traffic);
Amendment 47 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 2 – that, by 2014, a proposal should be submitted to provide for the internalisation of the external costs of all modes of transport, whilst avoiding double charging and market distortions, in order to increase investments in mobility, safety and research, thereby benefiting sustainable modes of transport;
Amendment 48 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 2 – that, by 2014, a proposal should be submitted to provide for the internalisation of the external costs of all modes of transport, whilst avoiding double charging and market distortions, in order to increase investments in mobility, safety and research, to the benefit of more sustainable modes of transport;
Amendment 49 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 2 – that, by 2014, a proposal should be submitted to provide for the internalisation of the external costs of all modes of transport, whilst avoiding double charging and market distortions, in order to increase investments in mobility, safety and research; the internalisation of external costs should only relate to the transport itself and not to the transhipment activities or the activities of industrial and logistics installations that are performed in the transhipment platforms, ports or terminals, since this could lead to double charging and could disadvantage intermodal transport operations;
Amendment 5 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A A. whereas European transport policy directly affects EU citizens in many situations in daily life, and a Single European Transport Area free of distortions to competition and social dumping benefits them,
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that large divergences exist in terms of transport infrastructure and geographical accessibility on the one hand between the eastern and western parts of the EU and on the other hand between central
Amendment 50 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 2 – that, by 2014, a proposal should be submitted to provide for the internalisation of the external costs of all modes of transport, whilst avoiding double charging and market distortions,
Amendment 51 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 2 a (new) - that the logistics sector is sufficiently reflected in the White Paper and the need for having the requirements of the logistics industry is taken into account when defining transport policy;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 2 a (new) - proposes that the funding of the traffic infrastructure should be designed more sustainably; here, the goal should be the unconditional earmarking of absolutely all of the money generated directly from road traffic for investments in road traffic projects;
Amendment 53 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – indent 2 bis (new) - that the proposals on the internalisation of the external costs (air and noise pollution) ensure that the funds are allocated to the same modes of transport that have generated them, with a view to promoting research and new technologies, and not just a transfer of traffic volumes from one mode of transport to another;
Amendment 54 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 – point 1 (new) (1) Regrets that, although the European Commission continues to describe small and medium-sized enterprises as the backbone of the European economy at every opportunity, they are not mentioned even once in the White Paper, despite their importance for the transport sector;
Amendment 55 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The Commission should, as soon as possible, submit a coherent, quantitative analysis of the present situation with respect to the level of infrastructure, the density of the transport network and the quality of transport services in all EU Member States, which will provide an overview of the present situation in EU27, the main outputs from this analysis being appended to the White Paper;
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. Requests that, by 2013, the Commission come with a proposal on social and working conditions, in order to facilitate the creation of a genuinely integrated European transport market and, at the same time, stimulate the attractiveness of the sector for employees; these proposals should be based on an in- depth analysis of the current situation of social and working conditions in all transport modes, the level of harmonisation between the legislation in the Member States, and on an impact assessment of the development of the transport labour market in 2020;
Amendment 57 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 b (new) 1 b. The Commission should, by 2013, submit an analysis of the present situation with respect to employment in transport and an impact study on the development of the labour market, including the quality of jobs, in relation to the changes planned by 2020, since a sustainable labour market and adequate preparation in the field of training and retraining are an important aspect of sustainable transport;
Amendment 58 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Approves the goals set in the White Paper for 2050, but considers that more specific provisions are required for the period until 2020 with regard to funding – in view of the economic situation of individual Member States – and the general challenges facing transport in the field of energy and the environment, and therefore calls on the Commission to
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Approves the ten goals set in the White Paper for 2050 as well as the overall target for emissions from transport, but considers that more specific provisions are required for the period until 2020 with regard to funding – in view of the economic situation of individual Member States – and the general challenges facing transport in the field of energy and the environment, and therefore calls on the Commission to draw up legal rules to reach intermediate goals for each of the ten goals of the White Paper and to reach the following additional goals by 2020 (in relation to
Amendment 6 #
Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new) A a. whereas the future European transport and mobility policy should integrate the 20-20-20 targets up to 2020 as a primary basis for decision making within this field, particularly as the transport sector will be amongst the most severely hit by extreme weather conditions resulting from climate change and by unsustainable and increasingly expensive fossil and nuclear energy sources,
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that large divergences exist in terms of transport infrastructure and geographical accessibility on the one hand between the eastern and western parts of the EU and on the other hand between central and peripheral regions, which need to be tackled; takes the view that the transport system of the EU should support balanced regional development and territorial cohesion, which will lead to the creation of a Single European Transport Area; points to the importance of transport policy instruments in reducing the outermost regions' deficit as regards their accessibility and competitive position, both in terms of access to the internal market and the external market with neighbouring countries and in relation to areas within those regions themselves, by harnessing the potential offered by regional airports and intra- and extra-European sea routes;
Amendment 60 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Approves the goals set in the White Paper for 2050, but considers that more specific provisions are required for the period until 2020, 2030 and 2040, with regard to funding – in view of the economic situation of individual Member States – and the general challenges facing transport in the field of energy and the environment
Amendment 61 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – indent 1 – a
Amendment 62 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – indent 2 – a 20% reduction in noise and energy consumption for
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – indent 2 a (new) - a noise reduction in rail, air and road transport of 5db at day (d), 10 dB at evening (e) and 15 dB at night (n), affecting densely populated areas;
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – indent 3 Amendment 65 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – indent 3 – a
Amendment 66 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – indent 3 – a
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – indent 4 Amendment 68 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – indent 4 –
Amendment 69 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – indent 4 – a
Amendment 7 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the transport sector is of major importance for the development of the European Union, its regions and its towns, as it accounts for some 5% of GDP, provides some 10 million jobs, logistics services generated € 1 trillion annual revenue in 2008 in Europe and is thus decisive for Europe’s position as an industrial and economic centre,
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Notes that large divergences exist in terms of transport infrastructure and geographical accessibility on the one hand between the eastern and western parts of the EU and on the other hand between
Amendment 70 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – indent 4 a (new) - following agreement on energy saving measures (EEDI/ SEEMP) in the IMO, further measures to reduce carbon emissions in shipping should continue to be managed through the IMO, and calls for these goals to be considered priorities, which should therefore be checked every year, decoupling transport growth from economic growth, instead of cutting back demand of transport; setting energy efficiency targets, rather than for modal shifts, should be at the centre of the future European transport policy to avoid a negative effect on the Europe 2020 target to increase competitiveness and the welfare of society;
Amendment 71 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 and calls for these goals to be considered priorities, which should therefore be checked every year and coordinated with other European policy initiatives in the field of air quality (SOx, NOx and particulates);
Amendment 72 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 and calls for all the
Amendment 73 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Stresses that all the legislation adopted in the past years aiming at reducing environmental impact, gas emissions, noise, energy consumption in the field of transport must be correctly and rapidly implemented in order to help the sector reaching the goals set up for 2020;
Amendment 74 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Underlines that the Transport Protocol of the Alpine Convention offers a good basis for developing a model of good practise on sustainable transport policy, inspiring other mountain areas in Europe;
Amendment 75 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the completion of the European internal transport market should be aimed for, without neglecting economic, employment, environmental and social aspects, and calls on the Commission to ensure that proposals on liberalising the airport, rail, road, and other markets do not lead to social dumping or private monopolies; regulating policy and particularly its enforcement needs to be accelerated;
Amendment 76 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3.
Amendment 77 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the completion of the European internal transport market should be aimed for, without neglecting economic, employment and social aspects, and calls on the Commission to integrate a social dimension in all transport policy to ensure that proposals on liberalising the airport, rail, road, and other markets do not lead to social dumping or private monopolies;
Amendment 78 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the completion of the European internal transport market should be aimed for, without neglecting economic, employment and social aspects, and calls on the Commission to ensure that proposals on liberalising the airport, rail, road, and other markets do not lead to social dumping
Amendment 79 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the completion of the European internal transport market should be aimed for, without neglecting its economic, territorial, employment and social aspects, and calls on the Commission to ensure that proposals on liberalising the airport, rail, road, and other markets do not lead to social dumping or private monopolies;
Amendment 8 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B B. whereas the transport sector is of major importance for the development of the European Union, its regions (including island, isolated and ultraperipheral regions) and its towns, as it accounts for some 5% of GDP, provides some 10 million jobs and is thus decisive for Europe’s position as an industrial and economic centre,
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Points out that accessibility plays a key role in the context of the outermost regions' development, frequently requiring a complex internal and external network of sea and air transport services and creating difficult conditions for mobility and accessibility, bearing in mind that the outermost regions have no alternative to air or sea transport and also have to cope with increased transport costs, something that in itself has negative economic and social repercussions;
Amendment 80 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the completion of the European internal transport market should be aimed for, without neglecting economic, employment and social aspects, and calls on the Commission to ensure that proposals on liberalising the airport, rail, road, and other markets do not lead to social dumping or
Amendment 81 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the completion of the European internal transport market should be aimed for, without neglecting economic, territorial, employment and social aspects, and calls on the Commission to ensure that proposals on liberalising the airport, rail, road, and other markets do not lead to social dumping or private monopolies;
Amendment 82 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the completion of the European internal transport market should be aimed for, without neglecting economic, employment and social aspects, and calls on the Commission to ensure that proposals on liberalising the airport, rail, road, and other markets do not lead to social dumping or
Amendment 83 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the completion of the
Amendment 84 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the completion of the European internal transport market should be aimed for, without neglecting economic, employment and social aspects, and calls on the Commission to ensure that proposals on liberalising the airport,
Amendment 85 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the completion of the European internal transport market should
Amendment 86 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the completion of the European internal transport market should be aimed for, without neglecting economic, employment
Amendment 87 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 3. Stresses that the completion of the European internal transport market should be aimed for, without neglecting economic, employment and social aspects, while taking into account the needs and characteristics of small and medium-sized enterprises, particularly numerous in the road haulage sector, and calls on the Commission to ensure that
Amendment 88 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 – indent 1 (new) - Stresses the importance of transport policy instruments in reducing the access problems and improving the competitive position of the outermost regions, both in terms of access to the internal market and the market with neighbouring countries, and in relation to their own internal areas, by investing in the potential of regional airports and intra- and inter- European sea links;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 bis (new) 3 bis. Stresses the importance of promoting integrated, effective modes of transport, taking into account the special characteristics of the outermost regions and islands, which in the case of air and maritime transport imply additional costs due to the need to protect the environment and reduce emissions. It is also important to guarantee access to the territories and mobility for all people and companies under equal conditions;
Amendment 9 #
Motion for a resolution Recital B bis (new) B bis. whereas transport policy plays a role in promoting economic, social and territorial cohesion in some areas, such as island regions, due to their specific characteristics,
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Believes that more attention needs to be paid to the utilization of the transport infrastructure (measured by volumes of traffic) supported from the European funds, is of the opinion that in the future not only new projects or modernization transport infrastructure projects should be supported from European funds but also repairs of existing key transport highways that are in adverse condition, are subject to frequent damages and accidents and cause major bottlenecks in European transport system;
Amendment 90 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Calls the European Commission to undertake an economic analysis on the costs of a failure to complete the Single European Transport Area with regard to the entire economy, including logistics companies, customers and citizens, further with a look at the impact of global competitiveness;
Amendment 91 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 bis (new) 3 bis. Stresses that, with regard to the economic situation, it is vital to implement truly European management of the transport infrastructures in order to make the European Union more competitive and attractive;
Amendment 92 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Highlights the inequalities in the development of transport infrastructure among the Member States and calls on the Commission and the Member States to help to develop a single and uniformly developed European transport area;
Amendment 93 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, environmental protection, social and employment conditions, and safety and security aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and regions – should be the guiding idea for future transport policy, and that these parameters should be used to determine modal distribution in countries and regions rather than retaining the proposed 300 km threshold for goods transport by road;
Amendment 95 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, environmental protection, energy security, social and employment conditions and safety aspects,
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and regions – should be the guiding idea for future transport policy, and that these parameters should be used to determine modal distribution in countries and regions rather than retaining the proposed 300 km threshold for goods transport by road; multi-modal solutions and linking long- distance and local transport should together be based on priorities of sustainable development;
Amendment 97 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and regions – should be the guiding idea for future transport policy
Amendment 98 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and regions – should be the guiding idea for future transport policy, taking full advantage of the strengths of each individual mode, and that these parameters should be used to determine modal distribution in countries and regions rather than retaining the proposed 300 km threshold for goods transport by road;
Amendment 99 #
Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4 4. Stresses that efficient co-modality in passenger and goods transport – measured in terms of economic efficiency, territorial cohesion, environmental protection, social and employment conditions and safety aspects, and geared to existing and planned infrastructure in individual countries and regions – should be the guiding idea for future transport policy, and that these parameters should be used to determine modal distribution in countries and regions rather than retaining the proposed 300 km threshold for goods transport by road;
source: PE-472.267
2011/10/11
ENVI
62 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Draft opinion Paragraph -1 (new) -1. Welcomes the Commission Roadmap for moving toward a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 including the 60% ghg reduction target for the sector by 2050; considers that the target is not stringent enough to ensure EU is not exceeding its fair share of global 2 C compatible carbon budget and regrets the lack of proposals to reduce travel and transport while moving to a more environmentally friendly modes of mobility;
Amendment 10 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Recommends that appropriate measures aimed at delivering sustainable transport be considered, in line with the Strategy for the internalisation of external costs,
Amendment 11 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Endorses the proposed move towards full application of ‘user pays’ and ‘polluter pays’ principles, and the engagement to eliminate distortions, including harmful subsidies, to generate revenues and ensure financing, including for future transport investments, and calls for measures to achieve these aims to be implemented by 2020;
Amendment 12 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers that, due to the oil dependence of transport, alternative and renewable
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 3. Considers that, due to the oil dependence of transport, alternative and renewable energies are
Amendment 14 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Calls for priority to ensure green logistics and improved mobility management;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 4. Takes note of the fact that in the recent past improvements in emissions from fossil fuel propelled means of transport have always been offset by higher demand, resulting in congestion and in air pollution still exceeding the legal limits; hence insists on the need for a switch to a different technology or the best possible fossil fuel technology and accordingly supports research carried out with or without the financial support of the EU aiming at accelerating the introduction of eco-innovations and new technologies in transport;
Amendment 16 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Calls for the Commission to study and come forward with proposals to introduce ship speed limits to reduce pollutant emissions and climate impact of shipping;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Underlines that subsidies for greening the urban transport sector would benefit employment if invested in public transport;
Amendment 18 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Calls for the creation of a credible and binding economic instrument for decarbonising transport, in order to ensure that the target of -60% is actually met; furthermore recognises that full internalisation of external costs for all transport modes, reflecting the polluter- pays principle, is an essential policy measure to help drive the move towards lower-carbon transport;
Amendment 19 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 5. Insists that, where these incentives do not work on a market basis, the Commission and Member States should have the courage to intervene and ensure polluter pays principle is implemented;
Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that a sustainable and environmentally friendly transport network is the nervous system of the European economy, which should
Amendment 20 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 5 Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes note of the fact that several
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes note of the fact that several regions in the EU with unmet transport needs still have to ‘catch up’ and will still show a big growth in transport once the infrastructure has been finalised and the economy is picking up; considers for this reason that it is also important to focus future actions on the elimination of disparities in infrastructure development between various European regions/countries, and calls on the Commission to mobilise EU financing instruments under the terms of a comprehensive financing strategy bringing together both EU funds and public and private national funds;
Amendment 23 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes note of the fact that several regions in the EU with unmet transport needs still have to ‘catch up’ and will still show a big growth in transport once the infrastructure has been finalised and the economy is picking up; considers for this reason that it is also important to focus future actions on the elimination of disparities in infrastructure development between various European regions/countries and to address this issue in the framework of social impact assessments;
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 6. Takes note of the fact that several regions in the EU with unmet transport needs still have to ‘catch up’ and will still show a big growth in transport once the infrastructure has been finalised and the economy is picking up; considers for this reason that it is also important to focus future actions on the elimination of disparities in infrastructure development between various European regions/countries, applying EU regional policy to that end;
Amendment 25 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the importance of improved cooperation between different transport operators to ensure more interoperability and therefore better conditions and connections for travellers, especially between rural and urban areas.
Amendment 26 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Recalls that, particularly in Member States with a large surface area, distances may be very long and population sparse; calls on the Commission, in the European transport system, also to take account of the transport needs of peripheral and sparsely populated regions;
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Notes that the internalisation of costs is necessary in order to promote competition in the transport sector, which shall not be hampered by environmentally harmful subsidies;
Amendment 28 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses the need of an integrated transport policy for the entire value chain of transport and logistics to suitably address the challenges of transport and mobility specially those derived from urban areas; Calls for an enhance coordination amongst policy-makers in the European institutions as well as permanent dialogue and consultation with the logistics industry, transport services suppliers and customers in a European logistic and mobility forum
Amendment 29 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. Calls on the Commission to help the Member States to further and in detail calculate the economic, environmental and health costs associated with this strategy, so as to facilitate in the best possible way, the internalisation of the external costs;
Amendment 3 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that a sustainable and environmentally friendly transport network is the nervous system of the European economy which should be given the necessary incentives for a transition to non- fossil fuel propulsion where technically and economically possible;
Amendment 30 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Stresses that the behaviour of transport users is decisive and calls for the creation of incentives to choose sustainable means of transport, where proposals should be made by 2013 to develop initiatives that promote behavioural changes, especially among young people, and develop infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists in towns, to double the number of passengers on public transport, which mainly uses alternative sources of energy, and to establish e-tickets for multi-modal travel, and where pricing policy should be considered as an incentive; calls on the Commission to present a strategy to promote the use of bicycles and safe journeys by foot in urban areas;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. Calls on the Commission to address the local transport monopolies which have evolved in the Member States and which create relevant discontinuities and distortions; notes therefore the need for an anti-monopoly policy especially for the transport sector;
Amendment 32 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7.
Amendment 35 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 7. Calls on the European Commission to support, promote and provide financial support for
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Emphasises the wide ranging potential benefits of using ICT to manage transport networks, such as reducing the number of journeys needed to deliver goods by ensuring a more efficient use of distribution networks, and improving traffic flow which can reduce air pollution, fuel consumption and journey times.
Amendment 37 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Points to the need for the EU to provide the financial support necessary for the development of the trans- European rail freight and passenger networks;
Amendment 38 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. Welcomes the proposal in the White Paper that 30% of road freight over 300 km must shift to other modes such as rail or waterborne transport by 2030, and more than 50% by 2050;
Amendment 39 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 7 b (new) 7b. Calls on the European Commission to report on cost-efficient action to reduce black carbon emissions of transport and come forward with proposals with quick climate mitigation effects and additional health co-benefits;
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 1. Points out that a sustainable and environmentally friendly transport network is the nervous system of the European economy
Amendment 40 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Recommends that the Commission continue to support and, if appropriate, initiate with Member States campaigns to create awareness of environmentally friendly transport alternatives, especially in sensitive urban areas where air quality and noise are a threat to human health; Suggests that, in cooperation with local authorities, employers could incentivise employees to use more resource efficient means of commuting.
Amendment 41 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 8. Recommends that the Commission continue to support and, if appropriate, initiate with Member States campaigns to create awareness of environmentally friendly transport alternatives, better known as the concept of active travel, i.e. walking and cycling, especially in sensitive urban areas where air quality and noise are a threat to human health, and therefore recommends that the Commission brings about a Master Plan on Walking and Cycling;
Amendment 42 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to draw up urban mobility plans for all EU cities, with specific measures to promote intermodalism and facilitate and encourage the use of bicycles and other environmentally friendly means of transport;
Amendment 43 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Notes that the success of the targets we set in reducing CO2 emissions depend on the technological developments, thus we need to invest on Research & Development in order to bridge the existing gap between the cost-efficient targets and the investments on new technologies, which would make these targets feasible;
Amendment 44 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to present a joint strategy involving information, communication and consultation of the players involved, including, in particular, participation by the citizens concerned, on the needs, planning, development and financing of the infrastructure required for growth, mobility, development and employment, in accordance with commitments made under the Europe 2020 strategy;
Amendment 45 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 8 b (new) 8b. Calls on the Commission to present a proposal for the compulsory introduction of speed regulators with limits of 120 km/h for light commercial vehicles and 80 km/h for heavy vehicles with a view to improving road safety and reducing CO2 emissions;
Amendment 46 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the Single European Sky and SESAR, if left to the guidance of industry and the free market, and be not interfered with by political governance, show how fuel consumption can be reduced by
Amendment 47 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9. Considers that the Single European Sky and SESAR show how fuel consumption can be reduced by +/- 10% in addition to the launch of new, fuel efficient and relatively silent aircraft; reiterates that aviation sectors full climate impact must be tackled in air space management policies, in particular avoidance of cirrus cloud formation in addition to unnecessary flight miles;
Amendment 48 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 9.
Amendment 49 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Reiterates the need to tackle also climate impact of international shipping; observing the lack of progress over the last decades, is convinced that international regulation will only emerge if prompted by regional initiatives and calls for the Commission, while keeping an open door to an eventual international system, to proceed with proposals, as foreseen by the climate package legislation, to introduce measures to bring EU international shipping under the EU climate targets with effect from 2013;
Amendment 5 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Calls for the introduction of binding ghg reduction target for the transport sector for 2050 with a pathway of intermediate targets at 3-5 year intervals; calls for these targets to be set at least at the level proposed by the Commission, i.e. reduction of 60% of ghg from transport compared to 1990 by 2050 and 20% below their 2008 level by 2030;
Amendment 50 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 a (new) 9a. Points out that railways and high- speed lines in particular could make a major contribution to a competitive, resource-efficient transport system providing fast links between Europe’s regions;
Amendment 51 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 9 b (new) 9b. Recognises that equal treatment concerning taxation in transport is crucial, in particular removal of distortions to competition such as the absence of VAT for cross-border air transport and the exemption of aviation from fuel tax;
Amendment 52 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 10. Is aware that a massive switch to new technology in the transport sector takes some time, and that actions within this process should take into account the diverse situations of individual Member States, but in the mean time encourages eco-innovation and calls for the use of more readily renewable fuels which reduce CO2 emissions, for investment in co-modality and for the concept of the internalisation of external costs to be extended to all modes of transport; observes that at this moment the rational use of fossil fuel
Amendment 53 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Maintains that the EU has to support research and promote European technological leadership as regards technologies necessary for the development of environmentally friendly sustainable means of transport, such as vehicles powered by electricity from renewable sources or hydrogen-propelled vehicles;
Amendment 54 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Considers it essential to support a modal shift as one means of moving towards the decarbonisation of transport;
Amendment 55 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Calls on the Commission to put additional effort into co-ordinating the up-to-now fragmented actions and initiatives undertaken by the local authorities in urban mobility and to facilitate policy transfers between cities;
Amendment 56 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 a (new) 10a. Stresses that the EU should maintain its leadership by consolidating its role as a production and research centre for all forms of transport, the priorities of which are lower emissions in the sector, a better logistics chain, safety and better traffic management;
Amendment 57 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 10 b (new) 10b. Stresses that all modes of transport have to internalise their external adaptation costs
Amendment 58 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 Amendment 59 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Insists on the correct implementation
Amendment 6 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 1 b (new) 1b. Insists that significant majority of EU subsidies in the transport sector be dedicated to rail infrastructure and improving intermodality; calls for proposals to improve fuel efficiency of heavy duty vehicles through binding regulations, to introduce mandatory truck charging reflecting external and infrastructure costs, as well as to require speed limiters for vans in order to reduce emissions and improve safety;
Amendment 60 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 11. Insists on the correct implementation of social legislation
Amendment 61 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 a (new) 11a. Calls on the Commission to identify, quantify and evaluate, in the impact studies of the legislative proposals, the creation of ‘ecological employment’ and measures to promote it;
Amendment 62 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 11 b (new) 11b. Ask the Commission to support Member State initiatives to create a safe and environmentally friendly fleet –, including motorised and non-motorised two- and three-wheeled vehicles, and to encourage its periodical renewal by means of tax incentives, green tendering...
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is aware that
Amendment 8 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is aware that CO2 emissions, as well as emissions of CO, NOx, VOC and SO4 and brake and tyre wear particles, have a strong influence on air quality, first and foremost in urban areas, and hence on human health in the form of lung diseases and different forms of cancer;
Amendment 9 #
Draft opinion Paragraph 2 2. Is aware that CO2 emissions, as well as emissions of CO, NOx, VOC and SO4, have a strong influence on air quality, first and foremost in urban areas, and hence on human health
source: PE-473.888
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/0 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
events/0/summary |
|
committees/0/shadows/4 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.845New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-PR-469845_EN.html |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.267New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-472267_EN.html |
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE469.856&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AD-469856_EN.html |
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.020&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-472020_EN.html |
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE472.029&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ENVI-AD-472029_EN.html |
docs/8 |
|
events/0/summary |
|
events/1/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament |
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee |
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0425_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0425_EN.html |
events/4/type |
Old
Committee report tabled for plenary, single readingNew
Committee report tabled for plenary |
events/5/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111214&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-12-14-TOC_EN.html |
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20111214&type=CRENew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-7-2011-12-14-TOC_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0584_EN.htmlNew
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0584_EN.html |
events/8/type |
Old
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Decision by Parliament |
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 54
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
docs/9/body |
EC
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-425&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0425_EN.html |
events/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-584New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0584_EN.html |
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/5 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
TRAN/7/06020New
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 52
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/subtype |
Old
Strategic initiativeNew
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0144:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011DC0144:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/text |
|
procedure/subject/4 |
3.60.08 Energy efficiency
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|