Activities of Ulrike RODUST related to 2016/2016(INI)
Plenary speeches (3)
Management of fishing fleets in the outermost regions (A8-0138/2017 - Ulrike Rodust) DE
Management of fishing fleets in the outermost regions DE
Management of fishing fleets in the outermost regions DE
Reports (1)
REPORT on the management of the fishing fleets in the Outermost Regions PDF (463 KB) DOC (73 KB)
Amendments (14)
Amendment 19 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
Recital E
E. whereas the ORs began to be incorporated into the CFP when the limitation on fishing effort was introduced in the 1990s; whereas, this is the reason the ORs consider themselves unfairly treated by the CFP and call it the ‘and 'doubley penalty’ised' by the CFP (no access to previous aid for fleet renewal and the current prohibition on aid for renewal);
Amendment 23 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E a (new)
Recital E a (new)
E a. whereas important sectors of the fishing fleet in the ORs were until recently not regulated or entered in the fleet register and therefore had no access to the Fisheries Fund for modernisation;
Amendment 37 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital K a (new)
Recital K a (new)
K a. whereas the EMFF can, however, provide financial help for ships in order to improve energy efficiency, safety, onboard hygiene and the quality of fishery products, as well as working conditions;
Amendment 67 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Welcomes the specific provisions for the ORs in the EMFF, such as the compensation for additional costs (which are subsidised 100% by the EMFF) – which is higher than in the previous programming period – and the maximum35% increase in public aid intensity, which is higher than for other region for other measures in OR areas;
Amendment 89 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Deplores the significant level of IUU fishing taking placeundertaken in the ORs’ EEZ attributable to both domestic and foreign vessels; points out that for the domestic part, such pracby foreign vessels and calls on the national authoritices also result from local food supply issuesto step up the fight against IUU fishing;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15 a (new)
Paragraph 15 a (new)
15 a. Calls on all parties involved to speed up implementation of the EMFF and use the opportunities it provides to invest heavily in fleet modernisation - improvements to safety, onboard hygiene, energy efficiency and quality of fishery products - as well as in fishing ports, landing sites and aquaculture, in order to generate new market outlets; also calls for the compensation regime for additional costs to be applied in order to make the sector more viable;
Amendment 104 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 16
Paragraph 16
16. Notes that a restructuring of the fishing sector in the ORs ismay be needed in order to ensure sustainable management of fish stocks, and if necessary a reduction of the number of vessels should be considered;
Amendment 115 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 19
Paragraph 19
19. Considers that both the databasesdata collection on stocks and assessing the impact of small- scale vessels in the ORs has to be improved in order to reinforce the scientific basis for fishing opportunities in the ORs;
Amendment 120 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Stresses that the potential of aquaculture should be better exploited in the ORs, as it might open up new export possibilitieresult in new production possibilities and high-quality products;
Amendment 127 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Calls on the Member States to stimulate the use of the European Structural and Investment Funds and to stress the synergies between the different funds in the ORs in order to develop economic opportunities for all players in the blue economy;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 23
Paragraph 23
23. Advocates reconsidering the fleet segmentation basis under a potential future CFP, in order to make better use of capacity limits and facilitate developmentthe requisite balance between each segment and the stocks being fished;
Amendment 143 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 24
Paragraph 24
24. Proposes considering increasinged aid intensity for engine replacementmodernising fishing vessels in the ORs where scientific evidence indicates that climate conditions and climate change have a decisive negative impact on the safety of the ORs’ fleets;
Amendment 149 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 25
Paragraph 25
25. Advocates not esexamining the suitabilishingty of a dedicated fund for the ORs, as comprehensive resources ofnd determining whether the European Structural and Investment Funds alre already availableady provide comprehensive resources and whether synergies between individual funds might be better ensured within the ESIF;
Amendment 160 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 27
Paragraph 27
27. Recommends creating better incentives under a future EMFF to encourage young people to enter the fishing sector and improve overall organisation of the fisheries sector in the ORs;