BETA

10 Amendments of Bendt BENDTSEN related to 2014/2211(INI)

Amendment 41 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital C
C. whereas when the emissions permits under the European emission allowance trading scheme (ETS) become more expensive, a full-blown competition crisis is liable to arisemeasures to combat carbon leakage ought to be continued after 2020 unless other regions of the world commit to new initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions significantly;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 56 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital E
E. whereas the exploitation of secondary metals is an imperative in an industrialised economy and must be developed as a competitive circular economy, with greater reuse and recycling of metal waste in an environmentally sound and health- conscious manner, but can by no means meet the base metals needs of European economies in terms either of quality or of quantity;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 64 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas this is especially true of energy transition, as base metals are at the heart of the new technologies needed for this to take place; whereas the EU is completely dependent on imports of the metals needed to produce renewable energy generation equipmentenergy transition and diversification may therefore result in increased demand for base metals;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1
1. Understands that the European Commission has launched discussions which will culminate in the reform of the ETS for the fourth period 2021-2028 and calls, in this connection, for the fight against climate change to focus on efficiency and optimising yields rather than on limiting production;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 102 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 2
2. Calls on the Commission, therefore, to amend the system for allocating emissions allowances via extensive application of the assessment used for the reference values applicable to industry, which are based on greenhouse gas emissions per tonne produced and not per facility, as it is the cleanest plants which are needed to produce more; underscores, in this connection, the importance of a system that makes it attractive to invest in energy- efficient solutions;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 114 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
4. SCalls for energy-intensive industriesses to continue their efforts to optimise recycling arrangements and cutting CO2 emissions with a view to ensuring future industrial competitiveness and meeting the EU's binding reduction targets; stresses in this connection that the two dimensions of competitiveness and emissions cuts are becoming complementary since, if European production becomes carbon- virtuous, preservation of its share of the European and world markets is an effective means of contributing to an overall limitation of greenhouse gas emissions of industrial origin; adds that the same applies to the production of imported goods, for which the same approach should be followed;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 140 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
6. Highlights the fact that an international agreement on combating climate change that creates circumstances of fair competition for all base metal producers would render border adjustment unnecessary;deleted
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 168 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
10. Notes that knowing the carbon content, which is assessed on an industry- wide basis, is essential for building an international system for combating greenhouse gas emissions; points out that the establishing of border adjustment measures is thus the precursor of an international system to combat CO2 emissions;deleted
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 190 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 12
12. Highlights the fact that border adjustment makes it possible to scrap compensation for indirect emissions as a means of addressing carbon leakage, which is why this measure was adopted in the first place;deleted
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
21. Suggests a preliminary investigation phase of a maximum of one month for an initial review of anti-dumping and anti- subsidy complaints following which, based on the initial evidence, preventive correction measures may be announced and a thorough investigation conducted; points out that the investigation should include an assessment of the economic consequences of any anti-dumping measures for European importers and users;
2015/07/15
Committee: ITRE