BETA


2014/2211(INI) Developing a sustainable European industry of base metals

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ITRE MARTIN Edouard (icon: S&D S&D) SALINI Massimiliano (icon: PPE PPE), TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen (icon: ECR ECR), MLINAR Angelika (icon: ALDE ALDE), JADOT Yannick (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), BORRELLI David (icon: EFDD EFDD)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 54

Events

2016/05/03
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2015/12/16
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2015/12/16
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 467 votes to 118, with 116 abstentions, a resolution on developing a sustainable European industry of base metals.

The resolution stressed the importance of the base metal industry for a whole range of downstream industries , including the automotive industry, the aerospace industry, energy production, the construction industry and packaging.

However, the steel sector, which has seen over 40 MT of steel production capacity close since 2008 and has lost more than 60 000 jobs directly and over 100 000 jobs indirectly, is experiencing its most serious peacetime crisis ever, resulting in greater dependency of the industrial manufacturing sectors on imports from third countries and in losses of industrial know-how, with a direct impact on millions of jobs.

Members considered that Europe, which is already heavily dependent on raw materials, cannot afford a new dependency to develop in respect of base metals.

The overriding need to act on climate change and high energy prices : Parliament stressed that a redesign of the current EU emissions trading system (ETS) system is one of the most pressing issues in terms of ensuring the competitiveness of the base metals industry. It noted that the Commission has made proposals which will culminate in the reform of the ETS for the fourth period 2021-2030 and called on the co-legislators, in this connection, to ensure that the reform includes the issue of carbon leakage and promotes efficiency, industrial innovation and the optimal yields that this reform is supposed to guarantee, while considering supplementing the ETS with other innovative instruments and strategies.

Parliament called on the Commission, when reviewing the ETS, to reward the best performers within energy-intensive industry from the point of view of producing goods while achieving lower emissions. It called for energy-intensive industries to continue their efforts to optimise recycling arrangements and cut CO2 emissions with a view to ensuring future industrial competitiveness and meeting the EU’s established binding reduction targets.

Carbon border adjustment –- a temporary and flexible measure of international dimension in line with the WTO : stressing that a comprehensive international agreement will reduce the risk of carbon leakage from the EU, Parliament stressed the fact that an ambitious international agreement on combating climate change that creates a level-playing field for all countries prepared to cooperate at multilateral level and forge a coherent global environmental regime to reduce carbon emissions would be the most positive way of dealing with global emissions.

Such an international agreement must necessarily include reliable commitments by the strongest emitting countries and comply with social and environmental standards.

The Commission is called upon to: (i) ensure that future trade agreements include provisions which significantly improve export opportunities and market access for European base metals products; (ii) include prohibition of distortive raw materials practices (dual pricing, export restrictions) in regional, bilateral and multilateral free trade agreements.

Members stressed that any measures affecting trade must respect international trade agreements.

Compensation for indirect emissions : Parliament regretted that the state aid-based compensation regime for indirect costs has created a new source of unfair competition on the EU single market among producers in electricity-intensive sectors, some of whom receive financial support from the authorities in their countries. It urged that this compensation be harmonised and, if justified , be granted at European level in order to ensure a level playing field with global competitors and among European producers and ensure effective carbon leakage protection.

Support for investing in the production of low carbon metals : Parliament urged that free allowances for the most efficient installations in the carbon-leakage sectors be allocated on the basis of programmes for investment in new equipment, R&D (including the capture, storage (CCS) and use of carbon (CCU)) and the training of workers , as soon as possible and at all events starting 2018 and during the fourth stage, covering the period 2021-2030. It stressed the absolute need for investment in research and development to enable Europe to remain a centre of excellence for the production of base metals.

Members called for ETS auction revenues to be used to finance climate action inside the EU and in developing countries, including for investments into renewable energy and energy efficiency projects in industrial sectors.

The resolution also stressed the importance of:

increasing transparency in the use of allocation revenues by Member States which would help citizens see how ETS revenues are being used by national authorities; e mphasising that installations and companies must respect all legal requirements on social responsibility and reporting in order to ensure equal and effective implementation of environmental regulations and ensure that competent authorities and stakeholders, including workers’ representatives and representatives of civil society and local communities; improving the competitiveness of Europe’s base metal sector of the possibility of concluding long-term contracts, under certain conditions to be clarified by the Commission, which must be compatible with a return on investment, the duration of which must be no less than 15 years in the case of highly capital-intensive industries; organising the transfer of skills between generations of workers to be organised in all plants putting in place active employment and industrial policies ensuring that this knowledge is developed and recognised as an important asset of the European base metal industry; creating European diplomatic action relating to raw materials for metal production based on strategic partnerships to share added valued between European countries and countries producing raw materials. establish an in-depth steel market analysis instrument that can provide precise information on the European and global steel supply-demand balance, distinguishing between structural and cyclical components of development of these markets; concluding the revision of the two regulations on trade defence instruments (TDI), in order to streamline, reinforce and speed up these instruments, ensuring that they are not weakened; press ahead quickly with the modernisation of TDI , in order to ensure that an appropriate response to unfair practices can finally be put in place and that the European market can be protected against dumping; facilitating the development and functioning of secondary metal markets and encouraging the establishment of a circular economy at every base metals production plant in order to link the exploitation of by-products and recycled metals with the aim of increasing their competitiveness.

Lastly, the Commission is called upon to: (i) develop economic incentives for recycling metals, including currently uneconomical critical raw materials such as rare earths, (ii) investigate how markets for recycled materials can be supported by inter alia green certificates for recycled materials, eco-design requirements and fiscal incentives, (iii) ensure that cohesion policy and European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) budgets are also leveraged to promote resource efficiency and recycling.

Documents
2015/12/16
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2015/11/24
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2015/10/23
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report by Edouard MARTIN (S&D, FR) on developing a sustainable European industry of base metals.

The report stressed the importance of the base metal industry for a whole range of downstream industries , including the automotive industry, the aerospace industry, energy production, the construction industry and packaging.

Europe, which is already heavily dependent on raw materials, cannot afford a new dependency to develop in respect of base metals , which would have a very adverse impact on the aforementioned downstream industries. In the steel industry, the EU has a flat steel production capacity shortfall due to the massive closures of recent years and a revival of demand. Demand for non-ferrous metals such as aluminium and copper is constantly growing despite the crisis.

The overriding need to act on climate change and high energy prices : Members stressed that a redesign of the current EU emissions trading system (ETS) system is one of the most pressing issues in terms of ensuring the competitiveness of the base metals industry. They called on the Commission, when reviewing the ETS, to reward the best performers within energy-intensive industry from the point of view of producing goods while achieving lower emissions.

They called for energy-intensive industries to continue their efforts to optimise recycling arrangements and cut CO2 emissions with a view to ensuring future industrial competitiveness and meeting the EU’s established binding reduction targets.

Carbon border adjustment –- a temporary and flexible measure of international dimension in line with the WTO : Members are looking forward to the COP21 climate conference in Paris, stressing the fact that an ambitious international agreement on combating climate change that creates a level-playing field for all countries prepared to cooperate at multilateral level and forge a coherent global environmental regime to reduce carbon emissions would be the most positive way of dealing with global emissions. Such an agreement would allow for fair competition for all base metal producers and would render considerations of border adjustments unnecessary provided that its implementation was subject to effective monitoring and any adjustments that were required; points to the fact that such an international agreement must necessarily include reliable commitments by the strongest emitting countries.

The report noted that the border carbon adjustment mechanism incorporates into European regulation an emissions reduction model also encompassing a consumption-based territorial approach and that this kind of bottom-up approach has the advantage of offering a universal solution that enables each state to decide in a sovereign manner how ambitious its climate policy is to be, subject to a careful impact assessment of the consequences. The Commission is called upon to: (i) ensure that future trade agreements include provisions which significantly improve export opportunities and market access for European base metals products; (ii) include prohibition of distortive raw materials practices (dual pricing, export restrictions) in regional, bilateral and multilateral free trade agreements.

Compensation for indirect emissions : Members regretted that the state aid-based compensation regime for indirect costs has created a new source of unfair competition on the EU single market among producers in electricity-intensive sectors, some of whom receive financial support from the authorities in their countries. They urged that this compensation be harmonised and, if justified , be granted at European level in order to ensure a level playing field with global competitors and among European producers and ensure effective carbon leakage protection.

Support for investing in the production of low carbon metals : the report urged that free allowances for the most efficient installations in the carbon-leakage sectors be allocated on the basis of programmes for investment in new equipment, R&D (including the capture, storage (CCS) and use of carbon (CCU)) and the training of workers, as soon as possible and at all events starting 2018 and during the fourth stage, covering the period 2021-2030. They stressed the absolute need for investment in research and development to enable Europe to remain a centre of excellence for the production of base metals.

Members called for ETS auction revenues to be used to finance climate action inside the EU and in developing countries, including for investments into renewable energy and energy efficiency projects in industrial sectors.

The report also stressed the importance of:

increasing transparency in the use of allocation revenues by Member States which would help citizens see how ETS revenues are being used by national authorities; improving the competitiveness of Europe’s base metal sector of the possibility of concluding long-term contracts, under certain conditions to be clarified by the Commission, which must be compatible with a return on investment, the duration of which must be no less than 15 years in the case of highly capital-intensive industries. Rather than annual electricity auctions, preference ought to be assigned to long-term stability of electricity supply contracts; organising the transfer of skills between generations of workers to be organised in all plants putting in place active employment and industrial policies ensuring that this knowledge is developed and recognised as an important asset of the European base metal industry; creating European diplomatic action relating to raw materials for metal production based on strategic partnerships to share added valued between European countries and countries producing raw materials. concluding the revision of the two regulations on trade defence instruments (TDI), in order to streamline, reinforce and speed up these instruments, ensuring that they are not weakened; ensuring that the Commission, in its analysis and comparisons, when defining relevant geographic markets, takes the global market as a reference and does not limit its analysis simply to the internal market; encouraging the establishment of a circular economy at every base metals production plant in order to link the exploitation of by-products and recycled metals with the aim of increasing their competitiveness.

Lastly, the Commission is called upon to: (i) develop economic incentives for recycling metals, including currently uneconomical critical raw materials such as rare earths, (ii) investigate how markets for recycled materials can be supported by inter alia green certificates for recycled materials, eco-design requirements and fiscal incentives, (iii) ensure that cohesion policy and European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) budgets are also leveraged to promote resource efficiency and recycling.

Documents
2015/10/13
   EP - Vote in committee
2015/09/22
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/07/15
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2015/05/28
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2014/12/17
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2014/10/14
   EP - MARTIN Edouard (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 8 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: -: 424, +: 219, 0: 57
ES IT EL PT CY LU RO AT MT LT EE PL SI SK CZ HU FI LV HR IE BG DK BE NL SE FR GB DE
Total
46
67
22
20
6
5
30
16
6
10
6
49
7
13
18
20
12
8
11
10
17
12
20
25
19
69
69
86
icon: S&D S&D
177

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1
3

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Against (1)

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1
3

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

Against (1)

2

Finland ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Portugal ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
202

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Malta PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

Against (1)

1

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1
4

Finland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 12/1 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 441, -: 233, 0: 22
IT FR ES HU EL RO PT BE CY LU SK AT MT SI IE DE HR LT EE PL FI CZ BG LV NL DK SE GB
Total
68
68
46
19
21
30
19
21
6
5
13
16
6
7
10
84
10
11
6
49
12
18
17
8
24
12
19
70
icon: S&D S&D
174

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Against (1)

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

2
3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46
3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
3

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
199

Luxembourg PPE

3

Slovenia PPE

Against (1)

4

Ireland PPE

Against (2)

Abstain (1)

4
4

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Portugal ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 12/2 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 517, -: 174, 0: 6
IT FR DE PL RO GB ES SK PT HU BE BG AT CZ MT SI HR LV DK LU FI EL LT IE CY EE NL SE
Total
68
66
86
49
30
70
45
13
18
20
21
17
15
18
6
7
11
8
12
5
12
22
11
10
6
6
25
19
icon: PPE PPE
202

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ENF ENF
34

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Austria ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: NI NI
14

France NI

2

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
3
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

3
4

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Against (2)

6

Hungary Verts/ALE

Against (1)

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

For (1)

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 17/1 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 598, -: 84, 0: 15
DE IT PL ES RO GB NL FR HU BE BG SE AT PT SK CZ FI DK LT HR LV EL EE SI LU IE MT CY
Total
85
67
49
46
30
70
25
69
20
21
17
19
16
19
13
18
12
12
10
9
8
22
6
6
5
10
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
201

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
176

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

3

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Lithuania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1
3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 17/2 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 402, -: 210, 0: 85
IT ES RO HU PT FR PL EL DE AT BG SK SI CZ LV BE LU HR CY FI LT MT IE EE NL DK SE GB
Total
68
44
30
20
20
68
48
22
85
15
17
13
7
19
8
21
5
11
6
12
11
5
10
6
25
11
19
70
icon: PPE PPE
200

Luxembourg PPE

3
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
176

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

For (1)

6

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (2)

6
icon: NI NI
14

France NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ALDE

For (1)

4

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Czechia ALDE

4

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

3
4

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

Romania ENF

Abstain (1)

1
2

Austria ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 17/3 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 548, -: 89, 0: 51
IT DE PL GB ES RO CZ PT BG FR BE EL NL SK HU IE HR LT SE FI AT DK LV CY SI EE LU MT
Total
66
81
49
69
45
30
19
20
17
68
19
21
24
12
20
10
11
11
19
11
16
11
8
6
7
6
5
6
icon: PPE PPE
197

Belgium PPE

2
2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
175

Netherlands S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

3
icon: ECR ECR
67

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Bulgaria ALDE

Against (1)

4

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2
3
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

France Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 17/4 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 540, -: 114, 0: 44
IT FR DE PL GB RO ES EL SK HU PT BE BG CZ IE LV CY SI HR LU FI LT MT NL AT EE DK SE
Total
68
69
85
49
68
30
46
21
13
20
20
21
16
19
10
8
6
7
11
5
11
11
6
25
16
6
12
18
icon: PPE PPE
199

Luxembourg PPE

3

Finland PPE

2
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
178

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
3
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ENF ENF
36
2

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

France EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

France NI

2

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
3
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Portugal ALDE

2

Bulgaria ALDE

For (1)

4

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2
4

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

France Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 17/5 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 486, -: 119, 0: 94
IT DE PL ES RO PT FR HU BG CZ AT BE NL SE EL LT HR SK IE LV FI EE SI LU DK MT CY GB
Total
68
86
49
46
29
20
68
20
17
19
16
21
25
18
22
11
10
13
10
8
12
6
6
5
12
6
6
69
icon: PPE PPE
203
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
177

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

3

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Sweden ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

France NI

2
3

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

Austria ENF

3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 17/6 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 539, 0: 90, -: 68
DE IT PL ES RO GB BG FR PT BE NL EL CZ SK SE FI HU LT HR AT DK LV SI EE LU MT IE CY
Total
85
68
49
46
30
69
17
69
20
20
24
22
17
13
19
12
19
11
11
16
12
8
7
5
5
6
10
6
icon: PPE PPE
201
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
176

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

Against (1)

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2
2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2
3
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 19/1 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 507, -: 168, 0: 23
FR IT DE ES RO HU PT AT EL IE CZ SK LV SI MT LU BG HR FI CY BE PL LT EE SE DK NL GB
Total
69
68
85
46
29
19
20
15
22
10
19
13
8
6
6
5
17
11
12
6
20
49
11
6
19
12
24
70
icon: PPE PPE
200

Slovenia PPE

3

Luxembourg PPE

3

Belgium PPE

4
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
178

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
3

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: ENF ENF
35

Romania ENF

1

Austria ENF

2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Germany GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

6

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
14

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

3

Belgium ALDE

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

5
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 19/2 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 392, -: 255, 0: 44
FR ES RO IT DE PT HU SK CY MT SI EL BG PL HR LV LU CZ BE SE IE EE LT DK FI AT NL GB
Total
68
45
30
67
83
17
20
13
6
6
7
22
17
48
11
8
5
19
21
19
10
5
11
12
12
16
23
69
icon: PPE PPE
199

Luxembourg PPE

3

Belgium PPE

4

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
2

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
172

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Greece S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Czechia S&D

For (1)

Against (1)

4

Belgium S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Sweden S&D

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

6

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Lithuania S&D

2

Denmark S&D

Abstain (1)

3

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

Against (2)

3
icon: ENF ENF
35

Romania ENF

1

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Germany NI

2
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
4

Denmark ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
46

France Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: ECR ECR
70

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 19/3 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 691, 0: 5, -: 5
DE FR IT GB PL ES RO NL BE HU SE CZ PT EL BG AT SK FI DK HR LT IE LV SI EE CY MT LU
Total
86
68
68
69
48
45
30
25
21
20
19
19
20
22
17
16
13
12
12
11
11
10
8
7
6
6
6
5
icon: PPE PPE
202

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
178

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2
2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Croatia ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

For (1)

3

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
35

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1
2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1
3
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Poland NI

1

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 19/4 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 362, -: 315, 0: 21
IT DE ES RO BG BE LT FI EE AT PT NL IE LV EL CY LU MT CZ HR SI SE DK SK HU FR GB PL
Total
65
84
46
30
17
21
11
12
6
16
20
24
10
8
22
6
5
6
19
11
7
18
12
13
20
69
70
49
icon: S&D S&D
176

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1
5
3
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2
3

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1

Poland NI

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Romania ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ENF

3

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
2
icon: ECR ECR
70

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
200

Belgium PPE

Abstain (1)

4

Lithuania PPE

2

Finland PPE

3

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands PPE

Against (1)

3

Ireland PPE

For (1)

4

Cyprus PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

For (1)

3
4

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 19/5 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 483, -: 116, 0: 95
PL DE RO ES GB BE BG FR PT IT HU CZ SK HR LT EL SE DK SI LV EE AT MT LU NL FI CY IE
Total
49
83
30
44
70
21
17
69
19
67
20
19
13
11
11
21
19
12
7
8
6
16
5
5
25
11
5
10
icon: PPE PPE
199
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Malta PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Finland PPE

Abstain (1)

3

Cyprus PPE

Against (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
175

Belgium S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Bulgaria S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Czechia S&D

4

Croatia S&D

2

Greece S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
70

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Italy ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Finland ECR

For (1)

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
47

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Abstain (1)

2
3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4
icon: ENF ENF
36
2

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ENF

Against (1)

3

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - § 19/6 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 531, -: 156, 0: 10
DE IT ES FR RO PT EL HU BE CZ AT SE SI IE SK LV CY PL MT LU BG HR DK LT FI EE NL GB
Total
85
67
44
69
30
20
22
20
21
19
16
19
7
10
13
8
6
46
6
5
17
11
12
11
12
6
25
69
icon: PPE PPE
203

Luxembourg PPE

3

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
177

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45
3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Ireland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

France NI

2
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Romania ALDE

For (1)

3

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2
4

Estonia ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Austria ENF

For (1)

3

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
67

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - Am 4 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 362, -: 329, 0: 9
IT FR ES EL MT PT DE RO IE AT CY FI SE DK SI LU LT HU EE HR PL LV SK BE CZ NL BG GB
Total
68
69
45
22
6
19
86
30
10
16
6
12
19
12
7
5
10
20
6
11
49
7
13
21
19
25
17
69
icon: S&D S&D
179

Malta S&D

3

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46
3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Romania ENF

1

Austria ENF

For (1)

3

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

France EFDD

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
63

Portugal ALDE

2

Romania ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Finland ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Croatia ALDE

For (1)

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: PPE PPE
202

Cyprus PPE

2

Finland PPE

3

Denmark PPE

Against (1)

1
4

Luxembourg PPE

3

Lithuania PPE

2

Estonia PPE

Against (1)

1

Belgium PPE

For (1)

4

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - Considérant D #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 402, -: 244, 0: 52
PL GB FR BG BE CZ LT HR SK LV IE FI IT DE SI HU RO EE AT NL MT CY DK LU ES PT SE EL
Total
48
68
69
17
21
19
11
11
13
8
10
12
67
86
7
20
30
6
16
25
6
6
11
5
44
20
19
22
icon: PPE PPE
200
2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

Against (1)

3
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2

Denmark ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36
2

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1
3

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
41

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3
icon: S&D S&D
179

Czechia S&D

4

Lithuania S&D

2

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2
3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - Considérant E/2 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 380, -: 266, 0: 52
PL GB BG CZ BE NL HU HR SK LT LV IE DE SI EL RO FI EE AT DK LU PT MT CY ES SE IT FR
Total
49
69
17
19
21
25
19
11
13
10
8
10
84
7
22
30
12
6
16
12
5
20
6
6
46
18
67
69
icon: PPE PPE
201
2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: ECR ECR
69

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Greece ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1
2

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Portugal ALDE

Against (1)

2

Sweden ALDE

2
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1
icon: NI NI
13

Poland NI

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Germany NI

Abstain (1)

2

France NI

Against (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
36
2

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1
3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3
icon: S&D S&D
178

Czechia S&D

4

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - Considérant I/2 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 441, -: 245, 0: 15
PL IT RO GB ES HU SK FR PT BG AT SI HR CZ BE DE LV LT MT LU IE FI CY EE DK EL NL SE
Total
49
67
30
69
46
20
12
69
19
17
16
7
11
19
21
86
8
11
6
5
10
12
6
6
12
22
25
19
icon: PPE PPE
202

Belgium PPE

4
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1
2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: S&D S&D
177
4
3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Croatia S&D

2

Czechia S&D

Against (1)

4

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Finland S&D

Against (1)

2

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1
3

Greece S&D

Abstain (1)

4

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

France NI

Against (1)

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

2
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1
3

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1
4

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - Considérant M/1 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 519, -: 167, 0: 11
PL DE RO IT ES BG BE NL CZ PT SK GB FR HU HR LT DK LV MT SE SI EE FI LU IE CY AT EL
Total
49
85
30
68
46
17
20
25
19
19
13
68
68
20
11
11
12
8
6
19
7
6
11
5
10
6
16
21
icon: PPE PPE
200
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Finland PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
176

Belgium S&D

3

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Malta S&D

3

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Italy ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

1

Germany NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

2
3
icon: ENF ENF
36
2

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Austria ENF

Abstain (1)

3
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - Considérant M/2 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: -: 346, +: 337, 0: 10
PL BG HU BE CZ HR SK LT LV RO EE DK LU SI NL IE FI MT PT CY AT ES DE SE EL FR IT GB
Total
49
16
20
21
18
11
13
11
8
28
6
12
5
7
24
10
11
6
20
6
16
46
84
19
20
69
68
68
icon: PPE PPE
196
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3

Finland PPE

2
icon: ECR ECR
68

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Romania ALDE

2

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Finland ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

United Kingdom ALDE

1
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

France NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Romania ENF

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

France EFDD

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: S&D S&D
177

Bulgaria S&D

4

Hungary S&D

4

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - Considérant O #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 410, -: 267, 0: 23
PL FR GB NL BG CZ BE HU HR SK LT LV SI RO FI EE AT DK LU IE DE MT SE PT CY ES EL IT
Total
49
67
69
25
17
19
21
19
11
13
11
8
7
30
12
6
16
12
5
10
85
6
19
20
6
46
22
68
icon: PPE PPE
202
2

Finland PPE

Against (1)

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: ECR ECR
69

Netherlands ECR

2

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Romania ECR

For (1)

1
2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1

Italy ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
65

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Romania ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36
2

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Romania ENF

1
3
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

For (1)

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
14

Poland NI

1

France NI

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

Hungary NI

Abstain (1)

3

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Italy GUE/NGL

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

France Verts/ALE

Abstain (2)

6

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3
icon: S&D S&D
178

Netherlands S&D

3

Czechia S&D

For (1)

4

Croatia S&D

2

Lithuania S&D

2

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

Against (1)

1

Finland S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Against (1)

1
3

Luxembourg S&D

Against (1)

1

Ireland S&D

Against (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Cyprus S&D

2

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - Considérant P #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 534, -: 116, 0: 52
DE IT PL RO ES GB BG BE FR HU PT NL CZ SK SE HR LT DK LV AT SI EE FI EL LU IE MT CY
Total
86
67
49
30
46
69
17
21
69
20
20
25
19
13
19
11
11
12
8
16
7
6
12
21
5
10
6
6
icon: PPE PPE
201
2

Denmark PPE

For (1)

1

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg PPE

3
icon: S&D S&D
179

Netherlands S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

For (1)

3

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Denmark ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Estonia ALDE

3

Finland ALDE

3

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Netherlands ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1

Lithuania ECR

1

Latvia ECR

For (1)

1

Finland ECR

For (1)

2

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Netherlands Verts/ALE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

3

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: NI NI
14

Germany NI

2

Poland NI

Abstain (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

2
3
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

Poland EFDD

1

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Poland ENF

2

Romania ENF

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4

Austria ENF

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Netherlands GUE/NGL

Against (1)

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - Am 1 #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 526, -: 118, 0: 57
IT FR DE PL ES RO HU EL AT PT GB IE BE SI SK MT LV BG HR LU CZ SE FI LT CY EE DK NL
Total
68
69
86
49
46
29
19
22
16
20
69
10
21
7
13
6
8
17
11
5
19
19
11
11
6
6
12
25
icon: PPE PPE
203

Luxembourg PPE

Abstain (1)

3
2

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
179

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Latvia S&D

1

Croatia S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

Against (1)

2

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

3

Finland Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2
icon: ENF ENF
36
2

Romania ENF

1
3

United Kingdom ENF

Abstain (1)

1

Belgium ENF

For (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

France EFDD

1

Poland EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Italy GUE/NGL

3

Germany GUE/NGL

For (1)

Abstain (1)

6

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

For (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

For (1)

3
icon: NI NI
13

France NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Germany NI

For (1)

Against (1)

2

Poland NI

1

Hungary NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

Against (1)

1

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
64

Romania ALDE

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Portugal ALDE

2

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

Against (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Finland ALDE

2
4

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

A8-0309/2015 - Edouard Martin - Résolution #

2015/12/16 Outcome: +: 467, -: 118, 0: 116
IT FR DE ES RO PT HU BE CZ AT EL BG PL SK IE SI MT HR LV FI LT LU CY EE DK SE NL GB
Total
67
69
85
46
30
20
20
21
19
16
21
17
49
13
10
7
6
11
8
12
11
5
6
6
12
19
25
69
icon: PPE PPE
200
2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Denmark PPE

Abstain (1)

1
icon: S&D S&D
179

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

3

Croatia S&D

2

Latvia S&D

1

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Estonia S&D

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands S&D

3
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
46

Italy GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

3

Portugal GUE/NGL

3

Czechia GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2
4

Finland GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

2

Denmark GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Abstain (1)

1
icon: ALDE ALDE
66

Romania ALDE

Against (1)

3

Portugal ALDE

Abstain (1)

2

Austria ALDE

Against (1)

1

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Slovenia ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Latvia ALDE

1

Finland ALDE

3

Estonia ALDE

3

Denmark ALDE

2

Sweden ALDE

Abstain (1)

3

United Kingdom ALDE

Against (1)

1
icon: ENF ENF
36

Romania ENF

1

Belgium ENF

Abstain (1)

1
3

Poland ENF

2

Netherlands ENF

4

United Kingdom ENF

For (1)

1
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
48

France Verts/ALE

6

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

Belgium Verts/ALE

2

Austria Verts/ALE

3

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Latvia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

For (1)

1

Sweden Verts/ALE

For (1)

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

3

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

6
icon: EFDD EFDD
42

France EFDD

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

Poland EFDD

1

Lithuania EFDD

For (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: NI NI
14

France NI

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Germany NI

Against (1)

2
3

Poland NI

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom NI

Against (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
69

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Czechia ECR

2

Greece ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Croatia ECR

Against (1)

1

Latvia ECR

Against (1)

1

Finland ECR

2

Lithuania ECR

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ECR

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

2
AmendmentsDossier
279 2014/2211(INI)
2015/07/15 ITRE 279 amendments...
source: 564.989

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
LÓPEZ BERMEJO Paloma
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.241
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-PR-557241_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE564.989
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-564989_EN.html
docs/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE567.759
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/ITRE-AM-567759_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2015-10-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0309_EN.html title: A8-0309/2015
summary
events/2
date
2015-10-23T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0309_EN.html title: A8-0309/2015
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151124&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2014-11-24-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2015-12-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0460_EN.html title: T8-0460/2015
summary
events/5
date
2015-12-16T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0460_EN.html title: T8-0460/2015
summary
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: MARTIN Edouard date: 2014-10-14T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2014-10-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARTIN Edouard group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
docs/3/body
EC
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0309&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2015-0309_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0460
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2015-0460_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2014-12-17T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: SALINI Massimiliano group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: LÓPEZ BERMEJO Paloma group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick group: EFD name: BORRELLI David responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2014-10-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: MARTIN Edouard
  • date: 2015-10-13T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: SALINI Massimiliano group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: LÓPEZ BERMEJO Paloma group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick group: EFD name: BORRELLI David responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2014-10-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: MARTIN Edouard
  • date: 2015-10-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0309&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0309/2015 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2015-11-24T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151124&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-12-16T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0460 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0460/2015 body: EP type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
commission
  • body: EC dg: Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union commissioner: BIEŃKOWSKA Elżbieta
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2014-10-14T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MARTIN Edouard group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
2014-10-14T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: S&D name: MARTIN Edouard
docs
  • date: 2015-05-28T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE557.241 title: PE557.241 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2015-07-15T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE564.989 title: PE564.989 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2015-09-22T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE567.759 title: PE567.759 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2016-05-03T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=26316&j=0&l=en title: SP(2016)190 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
events
  • date: 2014-12-17T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-10-13T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2015-10-23T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0309&language=EN title: A8-0309/2015 summary: The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report by Edouard MARTIN (S&D, FR) on developing a sustainable European industry of base metals. The report stressed the importance of the base metal industry for a whole range of downstream industries , including the automotive industry, the aerospace industry, energy production, the construction industry and packaging. Europe, which is already heavily dependent on raw materials, cannot afford a new dependency to develop in respect of base metals , which would have a very adverse impact on the aforementioned downstream industries. In the steel industry, the EU has a flat steel production capacity shortfall due to the massive closures of recent years and a revival of demand. Demand for non-ferrous metals such as aluminium and copper is constantly growing despite the crisis. The overriding need to act on climate change and high energy prices : Members stressed that a redesign of the current EU emissions trading system (ETS) system is one of the most pressing issues in terms of ensuring the competitiveness of the base metals industry. They called on the Commission, when reviewing the ETS, to reward the best performers within energy-intensive industry from the point of view of producing goods while achieving lower emissions. They called for energy-intensive industries to continue their efforts to optimise recycling arrangements and cut CO2 emissions with a view to ensuring future industrial competitiveness and meeting the EU’s established binding reduction targets. Carbon border adjustment –- a temporary and flexible measure of international dimension in line with the WTO : Members are looking forward to the COP21 climate conference in Paris, stressing the fact that an ambitious international agreement on combating climate change that creates a level-playing field for all countries prepared to cooperate at multilateral level and forge a coherent global environmental regime to reduce carbon emissions would be the most positive way of dealing with global emissions. Such an agreement would allow for fair competition for all base metal producers and would render considerations of border adjustments unnecessary provided that its implementation was subject to effective monitoring and any adjustments that were required; points to the fact that such an international agreement must necessarily include reliable commitments by the strongest emitting countries. The report noted that the border carbon adjustment mechanism incorporates into European regulation an emissions reduction model also encompassing a consumption-based territorial approach and that this kind of bottom-up approach has the advantage of offering a universal solution that enables each state to decide in a sovereign manner how ambitious its climate policy is to be, subject to a careful impact assessment of the consequences. The Commission is called upon to: (i) ensure that future trade agreements include provisions which significantly improve export opportunities and market access for European base metals products; (ii) include prohibition of distortive raw materials practices (dual pricing, export restrictions) in regional, bilateral and multilateral free trade agreements. Compensation for indirect emissions : Members regretted that the state aid-based compensation regime for indirect costs has created a new source of unfair competition on the EU single market among producers in electricity-intensive sectors, some of whom receive financial support from the authorities in their countries. They urged that this compensation be harmonised and, if justified , be granted at European level in order to ensure a level playing field with global competitors and among European producers and ensure effective carbon leakage protection. Support for investing in the production of low carbon metals : the report urged that free allowances for the most efficient installations in the carbon-leakage sectors be allocated on the basis of programmes for investment in new equipment, R&D (including the capture, storage (CCS) and use of carbon (CCU)) and the training of workers, as soon as possible and at all events starting 2018 and during the fourth stage, covering the period 2021-2030. They stressed the absolute need for investment in research and development to enable Europe to remain a centre of excellence for the production of base metals. Members called for ETS auction revenues to be used to finance climate action inside the EU and in developing countries, including for investments into renewable energy and energy efficiency projects in industrial sectors. The report also stressed the importance of: increasing transparency in the use of allocation revenues by Member States which would help citizens see how ETS revenues are being used by national authorities; improving the competitiveness of Europe’s base metal sector of the possibility of concluding long-term contracts, under certain conditions to be clarified by the Commission, which must be compatible with a return on investment, the duration of which must be no less than 15 years in the case of highly capital-intensive industries. Rather than annual electricity auctions, preference ought to be assigned to long-term stability of electricity supply contracts; organising the transfer of skills between generations of workers to be organised in all plants putting in place active employment and industrial policies ensuring that this knowledge is developed and recognised as an important asset of the European base metal industry; creating European diplomatic action relating to raw materials for metal production based on strategic partnerships to share added valued between European countries and countries producing raw materials. concluding the revision of the two regulations on trade defence instruments (TDI), in order to streamline, reinforce and speed up these instruments, ensuring that they are not weakened; ensuring that the Commission, in its analysis and comparisons, when defining relevant geographic markets, takes the global market as a reference and does not limit its analysis simply to the internal market; encouraging the establishment of a circular economy at every base metals production plant in order to link the exploitation of by-products and recycled metals with the aim of increasing their competitiveness. Lastly, the Commission is called upon to: (i) develop economic incentives for recycling metals, including currently uneconomical critical raw materials such as rare earths, (ii) investigate how markets for recycled materials can be supported by inter alia green certificates for recycled materials, eco-design requirements and fiscal incentives, (iii) ensure that cohesion policy and European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) budgets are also leveraged to promote resource efficiency and recycling.
  • date: 2015-11-24T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151124&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2015-12-16T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=26316&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2015-12-16T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0460 title: T8-0460/2015 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 467 votes to 118, with 116 abstentions, a resolution on developing a sustainable European industry of base metals. The resolution stressed the importance of the base metal industry for a whole range of downstream industries , including the automotive industry, the aerospace industry, energy production, the construction industry and packaging. However, the steel sector, which has seen over 40 MT of steel production capacity close since 2008 and has lost more than 60 000 jobs directly and over 100 000 jobs indirectly, is experiencing its most serious peacetime crisis ever, resulting in greater dependency of the industrial manufacturing sectors on imports from third countries and in losses of industrial know-how, with a direct impact on millions of jobs. Members considered that Europe, which is already heavily dependent on raw materials, cannot afford a new dependency to develop in respect of base metals. The overriding need to act on climate change and high energy prices : Parliament stressed that a redesign of the current EU emissions trading system (ETS) system is one of the most pressing issues in terms of ensuring the competitiveness of the base metals industry. It noted that the Commission has made proposals which will culminate in the reform of the ETS for the fourth period 2021-2030 and called on the co-legislators, in this connection, to ensure that the reform includes the issue of carbon leakage and promotes efficiency, industrial innovation and the optimal yields that this reform is supposed to guarantee, while considering supplementing the ETS with other innovative instruments and strategies. Parliament called on the Commission, when reviewing the ETS, to reward the best performers within energy-intensive industry from the point of view of producing goods while achieving lower emissions. It called for energy-intensive industries to continue their efforts to optimise recycling arrangements and cut CO2 emissions with a view to ensuring future industrial competitiveness and meeting the EU’s established binding reduction targets. Carbon border adjustment –- a temporary and flexible measure of international dimension in line with the WTO : stressing that a comprehensive international agreement will reduce the risk of carbon leakage from the EU, Parliament stressed the fact that an ambitious international agreement on combating climate change that creates a level-playing field for all countries prepared to cooperate at multilateral level and forge a coherent global environmental regime to reduce carbon emissions would be the most positive way of dealing with global emissions. Such an international agreement must necessarily include reliable commitments by the strongest emitting countries and comply with social and environmental standards. The Commission is called upon to: (i) ensure that future trade agreements include provisions which significantly improve export opportunities and market access for European base metals products; (ii) include prohibition of distortive raw materials practices (dual pricing, export restrictions) in regional, bilateral and multilateral free trade agreements. Members stressed that any measures affecting trade must respect international trade agreements. Compensation for indirect emissions : Parliament regretted that the state aid-based compensation regime for indirect costs has created a new source of unfair competition on the EU single market among producers in electricity-intensive sectors, some of whom receive financial support from the authorities in their countries. It urged that this compensation be harmonised and, if justified , be granted at European level in order to ensure a level playing field with global competitors and among European producers and ensure effective carbon leakage protection. Support for investing in the production of low carbon metals : Parliament urged that free allowances for the most efficient installations in the carbon-leakage sectors be allocated on the basis of programmes for investment in new equipment, R&D (including the capture, storage (CCS) and use of carbon (CCU)) and the training of workers , as soon as possible and at all events starting 2018 and during the fourth stage, covering the period 2021-2030. It stressed the absolute need for investment in research and development to enable Europe to remain a centre of excellence for the production of base metals. Members called for ETS auction revenues to be used to finance climate action inside the EU and in developing countries, including for investments into renewable energy and energy efficiency projects in industrial sectors. The resolution also stressed the importance of: increasing transparency in the use of allocation revenues by Member States which would help citizens see how ETS revenues are being used by national authorities; e mphasising that installations and companies must respect all legal requirements on social responsibility and reporting in order to ensure equal and effective implementation of environmental regulations and ensure that competent authorities and stakeholders, including workers’ representatives and representatives of civil society and local communities; improving the competitiveness of Europe’s base metal sector of the possibility of concluding long-term contracts, under certain conditions to be clarified by the Commission, which must be compatible with a return on investment, the duration of which must be no less than 15 years in the case of highly capital-intensive industries; organising the transfer of skills between generations of workers to be organised in all plants putting in place active employment and industrial policies ensuring that this knowledge is developed and recognised as an important asset of the European base metal industry; creating European diplomatic action relating to raw materials for metal production based on strategic partnerships to share added valued between European countries and countries producing raw materials. establish an in-depth steel market analysis instrument that can provide precise information on the European and global steel supply-demand balance, distinguishing between structural and cyclical components of development of these markets; concluding the revision of the two regulations on trade defence instruments (TDI), in order to streamline, reinforce and speed up these instruments, ensuring that they are not weakened; press ahead quickly with the modernisation of TDI , in order to ensure that an appropriate response to unfair practices can finally be put in place and that the European market can be protected against dumping; facilitating the development and functioning of secondary metal markets and encouraging the establishment of a circular economy at every base metals production plant in order to link the exploitation of by-products and recycled metals with the aim of increasing their competitiveness. Lastly, the Commission is called upon to: (i) develop economic incentives for recycling metals, including currently uneconomical critical raw materials such as rare earths, (ii) investigate how markets for recycled materials can be supported by inter alia green certificates for recycled materials, eco-design requirements and fiscal incentives, (iii) ensure that cohesion policy and European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) budgets are also leveraged to promote resource efficiency and recycling.
  • date: 2015-12-16T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BIEŃKOWSKA Elżbieta
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ITRE/8/02154
New
  • ITRE/8/02154
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.40.02 Iron and steel industry, metallurgical industry
New
3.40.02
Iron and steel industry, metallurgical industry
activities/4/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2015-0460 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0460/2015
activities/4/type
Old
Vote in plenary scheduled
New
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
New
Procedure completed
activities/4
date
2015-12-16T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2/docs/0/text
  • The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted the own-initiative report by Edouard MARTIN (S&D, FR) on developing a sustainable European industry of base metals.

    The report stressed the importance of the base metal industry for a whole range of downstream industries, including the automotive industry, the aerospace industry, energy production, the construction industry and packaging.

    Europe, which is already heavily dependent on raw materials, cannot afford a new dependency to develop in respect of base metals, which would have a very adverse impact on the aforementioned downstream industries. In the steel industry, the EU has a flat steel production capacity shortfall due to the massive closures of recent years and a revival of demand. Demand for non-ferrous metals such as aluminium and copper is constantly growing despite the crisis.

    The overriding need to act on climate change and high energy prices: Members stressed that a redesign of the current EU emissions trading system (ETS) system is one of the most pressing issues in terms of ensuring the competitiveness of the base metals industry. They called on the Commission, when reviewing the ETS, to reward the best performers within energy-intensive industry from the point of view of producing goods while achieving lower emissions.

    They called for energy-intensive industries to continue their efforts to optimise recycling arrangements and cut CO2 emissions with a view to ensuring future industrial competitiveness and meeting the EU’s established binding reduction targets.

    Carbon border adjustment –- a temporary and flexible measure of international dimension in line with the WTO: Members are looking forward to the COP21 climate conference in Paris, stressing the fact that an ambitious international agreement on combating climate change that creates a level-playing field for all countries prepared to cooperate at multilateral level and forge a coherent global environmental regime to reduce carbon emissions would be the most positive way of dealing with global emissions. Such an agreement would allow for fair competition for all base metal producers and would render considerations of border adjustments unnecessary provided that its implementation was subject to effective monitoring and any adjustments that were required; points to the fact that such an international agreement must necessarily include reliable commitments by the strongest emitting countries.

    The report noted that the border carbon adjustment mechanism incorporates into European regulation an emissions reduction model also encompassing a consumption-based territorial approach and that this kind of bottom-up approach has the advantage of offering a universal solution that enables each state to decide in a sovereign manner how ambitious its climate policy is to be, subject to a careful impact assessment of the consequences. The Commission is called upon to: (i) ensure that future trade agreements include provisions which significantly improve export opportunities and market access for European base metals products; (ii) include prohibition of distortive raw materials practices (dual pricing, export restrictions) in regional, bilateral and multilateral free trade agreements.

    Compensation for indirect emissions: Members regretted that the state aid-based compensation regime for indirect costs has created a new source of unfair competition on the EU single market among producers in electricity-intensive sectors, some of whom receive financial support from the authorities in their countries. They urged that this compensation be harmonised and, if justified, be granted at European level in order to ensure a level playing field with global competitors and among European producers and ensure effective carbon leakage protection.

    Support for investing in the production of low carbon metals: the report urged that free allowances for the most efficient installations in the carbon-leakage sectors be allocated on the basis of programmes for investment in new equipment, R&D (including the capture, storage (CCS) and use of carbon (CCU)) and the training of workers, as soon as possible and at all events starting 2018 and during the fourth stage, covering the period 2021-2030. They stressed the absolute need for investment in research and development to enable Europe to remain a centre of excellence for the production of base metals.

    Members called for ETS auction revenues to be used to finance climate action inside the EU and in developing countries, including for investments into renewable energy and energy efficiency projects in industrial sectors.

    The report also stressed the importance of:

    • increasing transparency in the use of allocation revenues by Member States which would help citizens see how ETS revenues are being used by national authorities;
    • improving the competitiveness of Europe’s base metal sector of the possibility of concluding long-term contracts, under certain conditions to be clarified by the Commission, which must be compatible with a return on investment, the duration of which must be no less than 15 years in the case of highly capital-intensive industries. Rather than annual electricity auctions, preference ought to be assigned to long-term stability of electricity supply contracts;
    • organising the transfer of skills between generations of workers to be organised in all plants putting in place active employment and industrial policies ensuring that this knowledge is developed and recognised as an important asset of the European base metal industry;
    • creating European diplomatic action relating to raw materials for metal production based on strategic partnerships to share added valued between European countries and countries producing raw materials.
    • concluding the revision of the two regulations on trade defence instruments (TDI), in order to streamline, reinforce and speed up these instruments, ensuring that they are not weakened;
    • ensuring that the Commission, in its analysis and comparisons, when defining relevant geographic markets, takes the global market as a reference and does not limit its analysis simply to the internal market;
    • encouraging the establishment of a circular economy at every base metals production plant in order to link the exploitation of by-products and recycled metals with the aim of increasing their competitiveness.

    Lastly, the Commission is called upon to: (i) develop economic incentives for recycling metals, including currently uneconomical critical raw materials such as rare earths, (ii) investigate how markets for recycled materials can be supported by inter alia green certificates for recycled materials, eco-design requirements and fiscal incentives, (iii) ensure that cohesion policy and European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) budgets are also leveraged to promote resource efficiency and recycling.

activities/3/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20151124&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate scheduled
New
Debate in Parliament
activities/3/type
Old
Debate in plenary scheduled
New
Debate scheduled
activities/3/date
Old
2015-11-23T00:00:00
New
2015-11-24T00:00:00
activities/4
date
2015-11-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2015-0309&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0309/2015
activities/3/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Debate in plenary scheduled
activities/4
date
2015-11-24T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in plenary scheduled
activities/2
date
2015-10-23T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Awaiting committee decision
New
Awaiting Parliament 1st reading / single reading / budget 1st stage
activities/1/committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: SALINI Massimiliano group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: LÓPEZ BERMEJO Paloma group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick group: EFD name: BORRELLI David responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2014-10-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: MARTIN Edouard
activities/1/date
Old
2015-10-26T00:00:00
New
2015-10-13T00:00:00
activities/1/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
activities/2/date
Old
2015-09-22T00:00:00
New
2015-11-23T00:00:00
activities/2/type
Old
Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
activities/0
date
2014-12-17T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: SALINI Massimiliano group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: LÓPEZ BERMEJO Paloma group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick group: EFD name: BORRELLI David responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2014-10-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: MARTIN Edouard
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
ITRE/8/02154
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Awaiting committee decision
activities
  • date: 2015-09-22T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote scheduled in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2015-10-26T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: SALINI Massimiliano group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: ALDE name: MLINAR Angelika group: GUE/NGL name: LÓPEZ BERMEJO Paloma group: Verts/ALE name: JADOT Yannick group: EFD name: BORRELLI David responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2014-10-14T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: MARTIN Edouard
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/internal_market/ title: Internal Market and Services commissioner: BIEŃKOWSKA Elżbieta
procedure
reference
2014/2211(INI)
title
Developing a sustainable European industry of base metals
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Preparatory phase in Parliament
subtype
Initiative
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject
3.40.02 Iron and steel industry, metallurgical industry