7 Amendments of Sven GIEGOLD related to 2016/2187(DEC)
Amendment 7 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 2
Paragraph 2
2. Stresses that, while making sure that all assignments are carried out in full, EIOPA should carefully stick to the tasks assigned to it by the Union legislator and should not seek to de facto broaden its mandate beyond those assignments; emphasises, in this respect that, where possible, EIOPA needs to pay particular attention to the principle of proportionality;
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Believes that the EIOPA should fully use the leeway provided by its mandate to effectively foster regulatory proportionality;
Amendment 15 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3 b (new)
Paragraph 3 b (new)
3 b. Notes with concern that EIOPA does not fully exercise all its prerogatives established in its legal framework and in particular when it comes to breaches of EU law, peer reviews, binding mediation and consumer protection; underlines that EIOPA should make sure that resources are maximised in order to fully fulfil its legal mandate;
Amendment 17 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Believes that the EIOPA budget still has rationalisation potential; sStresses, therefore, that any potential increases in EIOPA's means should be accompanied by adequate rationalprioritisation measures;
Amendment 22 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
Paragraph 5
5. ConcludesIs of the opinion that EIOPA’'s financing arrangement is to be reviewed; calls on the Commission to examine the possibility to modify the current financing arrangement by introducing appropriately and proportionately calibrated fees for market participants, possibly partly replacing the contributions of national competent authorities;
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Considers that the minutes of meetings of the Board of Supervisors, which are publicly available, and of the Stakeholder Groups, which are publicly available should be published more swiftly to reduce the current time lag of up to three months between meetings and disclosure of minutes and that they should provide better insight into the discussions held, members’' positions and voting behaviour; believes that outreach to the general public could also be enhanced by web streaming events.; deplores the de facto unequal accessibility of documents and information from internal meetings to different stakeholders, including the European Parliament;
Amendment 33 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6 a (new)
Paragraph 6 a (new)
6 a. Is of the opinion that EIOPA should swiftly implement a secure channel for whistle-blowers in the framework of its action plan for the years to come;