BETA

9 Amendments of Yannick JADOT related to 2010/2245(INI)

Amendment 2 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1
1. Points out that selective internationalisation and innovation arcan be key drivers of competitiveness and growth if they are part and pare crucial to the EU 2020 strategic goalcel of a long term EU industrial strategy; regards it as crucial in implementing the EU 2020 strategic goals to define and support especially those productive areas in which the EU is able to maintain or gain competitive advantages over the next 30 years;
2011/02/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 4 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. underlines the importance of climate and energy efficient and renewable technologies in the shift towards a sustainable global economy; recognizes the lead position of the EU in many key sectors for climate-friendly and resource- efficient industrial production; calls on the Commission to define strategies of internationalisation and innovation in these sectors;
2011/02/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 13 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 3
3. Considers that, in the EU's innovation policies, particular attention must be paid to supporting start-up and scale economy of eco-compatible, energy- saving and low- carbon production, protecting IPR, improving SMEs‘ access to funding, making SMEs internationally active, liberalising protected markets, stabilising exchange rates, foso that internationalisation is not in substitution but in addition to domestic demand; considers a strong domestic industering the legal protection of EU companies abroad and combating unfair competition and counterfeitingal base as the best guarantee to resist to competitive pressures and often unfair practices which come along with internationalization and open global markets;
2011/02/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 21 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 4
4. Regrets that our international partners have not opened their internal public procurement markets to EU companies in the same way that the EU internal market is open to third-country enterprisesConsiders the EU public procurement markets an important factor for the scale introduction of new eco-compatible products and services; asks the Commission to reconsider its policy of unconditionally open procurement markets within the Government Procurement Agreement of the WTO and in negotiations of Free Trade Agreements with third countries, given that expectations that other countries open their procurement markets to EU companies have been disappointed;
2011/02/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 24 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 5
5. Insists on the need to focus particularly on non-tariff barriers, which, as tariffs are gradually reduced or eliminated, tend to become the main obstacles to international trade; regards as unjustified all barriers resulting from the incoherent implementation of bilateral and multilateral trade rules; instead regards as justified all barriers resulting from the legitimate legislative and administrative activity of public authorities originating in other than trade scopes but having unintended consequences on trade, whose removal must be subject to public consultation and deliberation;
2011/02/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 27 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 6
6. Encourages the simplification of SME innovation and start-up policies; supports the creation of a European service to facilitate Innovation Partnerships; regards political and financial support for networking activities among SMEs facilitating cooperation in R&D, marketing and internationalization within sectoral clusters as crucial in fostering innovation;
2011/02/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 31 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 7
7. Points out that the pending single European patent and the European Company Statute need to be adopteapted to acknowledge the contribution of public research and innovation financing and public interests regarding the dissemination of innovation, and to promote the transition to extra-Community trade; underlines the need to upgrade the quality while reduceing costs for EU patents in order to make them more innovation-oriented and competitive vis-à- vis US and Japanese prices;
2011/02/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 34 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8
8. Acknowledges that the transfer of EU high-technology knowhow to third countries should be monitored in order to avoid unfair competinotified to and monitored by the Commission in order to gain better information of innovation, piracy and counterfeiting.atterns and future developments, and to avoid unfair competition;
2011/02/15
Committee: INTA
Amendment 36 #
Draft opinion
Paragraph 8 a (new)
8a. Recognizes that the fight against climate change and the strive towards energy efficiency and de-materialization of industrial production implies an active policy of global dissemination of novel technologies; is aware of the fact that policy-induced dissemination of technology could run counter to existing ownership principles of intellectual property which might make public compensation systems for innovators necessary.
2011/02/15
Committee: INTA