BETA


2010/2245(INI) Innovation Union: transforming Europe for a post-crisis world

Progress: Procedure completed

RoleCommitteeRapporteurShadows
Lead ITRE MERKIES Judith A. (icon: S&D S&D) SARTORI Amalia (icon: PPE PPE), CHATZIMARKAKIS Jorgo (icon: ALDE ALDE), BÜTIKOFER Reinhard (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), LAMBERTS Philippe (icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE), TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen (icon: ECR ECR), MATIAS Marisa (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), TZAVELA Niki (icon: EFD EFD)
Committee Opinion INTA VAIDERE Inese (icon: PPE PPE) Marielle DE SARNEZ (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion ECON
Committee Opinion EMPL ESSAYAH Sari (icon: PPE PPE) Patrick LE HYARIC (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL), Gesine MEISSNER (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Committee Opinion ENVI FERREIRA João (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion IMCO TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL) Matteo SALVINI (icon: ENF ENF)
Committee Opinion REGI HÜBNER Danuta Maria (icon: PPE PPE) Michael THEURER (icon: ALDE ALDE), Derek VAUGHAN (icon: S&D S&D)
Committee Opinion CULT BADIA I CUTCHET Maria (icon: S&D S&D) Hannu TAKKULA (icon: ALDE ALDE), Marie-Christine VERGIAT (icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL)
Committee Opinion JURI WIKSTRÖM Cecilia (icon: ALDE ALDE)
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 52

Events

2011/12/02
   EC - Follow-up document
Details

The Commission presents a report on the State of Innovation Union 2011. Innovation Union is an integrated flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 strategy, built around 34 specific commitments and aims at ensuring that innovative ideas are translated into new goods and services that create growth and jobs.

The report sets out the background, stating that the first year of Innovation Union has seen the economic and financial crisis reaching a new phase, and the pressure to cut investments is huge. At the same time, the shift in economic power from West to East is accelerating. Both the Innovation Union Scoreboard and the Innovation Union Competitiveness report highlight the fact that Europe’s research and innovation performance has declined over recent years.

This report focuses on key policy actions of 2011, and provides an overview on the state of play of all 34 commitments of the Innovation Union.

Progress: overall, good progress has been made in launching the 34 Innovation Union commitments. Legislative proposals have been tabled according to plan and pilot actions have been launched and tested. Out of the 34 Innovation Union commitments, two have not been taken up : at national level, dedicating procurement budgets to innovative products and services and, at EU level, consulting social partners on bringing the knowledge economy to all occupational levels. Two more actions are delayed: regulatory screening and the eco-innovation action plan. The Commission will step up its efforts to launch the delayed activities promptly and calls on Member States to intensify their efforts to drive demand for innovative solutions through public procurement.

The paper also makes the following points:

- the Commission is proposing to increase investments in research, innovation and education in support of the EU's pro-growth agenda. The Horizon 2020 proposal enacts many of the Innovation Union commitments;

- there has been good track record on putting in place the conditions that will smooth the path from idea to market. In particular, the Commission has already tabled legislative proposals for unitary patent protection and for modernising standard-setting ;

- the Commission will put forward measures for completing European Research Area by 2014, and expects to present a proposal in mid-2012;

The challenge for the next implementation phase will be that all actors take collective responsibility for Innovation Union delivery, adopt the proposals tabled by the Commission and translate firm political commitments into action both at national and at EU level.

Action at national level: the success of Innovation Union will depend on the extent to which it can mobilise action at national and regional level. Overall, the National Reform Programmes include a breadth of measures that offer a good starting point for stimulating innovation. However, national programmes often lack ambition and specificity. Additional efforts are needed to reach the EU’s 3 % R&D target and Member States need to do more to protect and prioritise expenditure on research and education and the key infrastructures to sustain future growth.

A few trends could be detected from the announced reforms with respect to research and innovation:

· a majority of Member States are in the process of improving their governance structures and strategic guidance for research and innovation, which is often accompanied by a gradual integration of the two policy fields and increased targeting of public funding on selected areas. At this stage, however, very few countries are explicitly targeting societal challenges as their main priority;

· a majority of Member States are engaged in improving framework conditions or financial support for research and innovation, in particular through R&D tax incentives, and different forms of support to innovative SMEs, including venture capital. An increasing number of Member States are paying attention to demand-side innovation policy instruments, in particular public procurement. So far, only a few countries have an approach that seeks to integrate demand- and supply-side instruments;

· in terms of budgets allocated to R&D, only a limited number of Member States — including Denmark, France, Germany and Sweden — have launched new funding initiatives, while some others such as Slovenia are earmarking a substantial share of Structural Funds for research and innovation. It appears that countries committed to increasing their R&D funding are also the ones which consider the broadest spectrum of growth-enhancing measures in line with the Innovation Union areas of action, and are already high or aspiring innovation performers.

There is clearly a risk of widening the innovation divide between the Member States . It is important that modest innovators sustain their recent positive commitments and the middle-of-the-range innovators are urged not to decrease further their R&D public investments and to start planning to recover lost momentum. Only in this way can Europe meet its ambition on research and innovation targets. Member States are invited to do more to prioritise research and innovation investments and turn into action political commitments undertaken in 2011, especially on pursuing reforms aimed at boosting the effectiveness of their research and innovation systems and improving the use of Structural Funds for research and innovation.

EU funding for research and innovation: in its proposal for a Budget for Europe 2020 , the Commission envisages substantial re-orientation of the future EU budget towards research and innovation, bringing together current research and innovation programmes into a single strategic framework — Horizon 2020 — to fund the whole innovation cycle. Many of the Innovation Union commitments are enacted upon through Horizon 2020, notably: more focus on societal challenges, a strengthened approach to SMEs, and stronger support to market uptake of innovation, including by means of procurements, standard-setting and loan and equity financing. A number of simplification measures for the current Framework Programme (FP7) have already been introduced early 2011, and Horizon 2020 will show more far-reaching simplification.

In parallel, the existing EU research and innovation funding is already being focused on Innovation Union priorities. The Commission is piloting new approaches with Horizon 2020 in mind.

Future action: For 2012, the Commission will continue delivering the Innovation Union, notably by presenting the two remaining Innovation Union initiatives scheduled for 2012, i.e. the proposal for the European Research Area Framework and the new headline indicator. It will also present an external evaluation by the newly created European Research and Innovation Advisory Board.

In tandem with the innovation policy measures under way, the Commission will review the current approaches to innovation in other EU policies and propose strategies to mainstream innovation into all EU policies.

2011/09/19
   EC - Commission response to text adopted in plenary
Documents
2011/07/07
   UK_HOUSE-OF-LORDS - Contribution
Documents
2011/05/12
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2011/05/12
   EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The European Parliament adopted a resolution on Innovation Union: transforming Europe for a post-crisis world, in response to the Commission Communication setting out the main initiatives needed to create ‘Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative: Innovation Union’.

(1) An integrated and interdisciplinary approach : whilst welcoming the Innovation Union flagship initiative, the resolution calls for : (i) a broad concept of innovation that goes beyond technological and product oriented innovation ; (ii) involves all stakeholders, in particular enterprises, and highlights the various enabling roles of citizens, while realising a mindset change.

Parliament considers that innovation, in all fields of knowledge and of economic and social activity, must be guided by the criteria of public interest, improvement of quality of life, promotion of social wellbeing and preservation of the environment and the balance of nature.

The resolution underlines the importance of climate and energy-efficient and renewable technologies in the shift towards a sustainable global economy. The Commission is asked to define strategies on internationalisation and innovation in these sectors. Members also call for the adoption of an ambitious Eco-innovation Action Plan.

Parliament recalls that innovation is not exclusively intended to meet major societal challenges but also plays a particularly important role in the manufacture of consumer-friendly and attractive products in the fields of leisure, technology, industry, culture and entertainment. Noting that the digital world and ICTs are engines of innovation, it wants the Commission and Member States to step up their implementation of high-speed internet.

Members stress that that the success of innovation and research policy is dependent upon:

strategic orientation, development, design and implementation of all policies and measures, with the aim of contributing to and enhancing innovation in Europe; well-coordinated multidisciplinary cooperation and (financial) support at EU, Member State, regional and local level; maximum involvement of all relevant players, e.g. SMEs, industry, universities, research institutes, RTOs, governments, Civil Society Organizations and social partners; coordination, coherence and synergy among the different policy areas, actions and instruments, so as to prevent fragmentation and duplication; shaping a positive regulatory environment for innovation products in order to adapt to market needs; policy evaluation methodologies and processes, including peer review panels and dissemination of successful experiments.

(2) Citizen-centred Innovation Society : the Commission and Member States are invited to put serious effort into bringing about a change of mindset towards innovative and curiosity-driven thinking and risk-taking.

The resolution underlines the importance of the following:

steps to support initiatives aimed at promoting scientific dialogue and the dissemination of findings among the widest possible public, in addition to the scientific community; fostering the development at regional level of an innovation culture ; promoting research on social innovation and to provide public funds in support of it as well as public-private partnerships; modernising education systems and efforts to overcome skill shortages in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics; raising the level of lifelong learning and of developing training activities for all in order to enhance eco-innovativeness and entrepreneurship; promoting policies to strengthen cooperation between education systems and the business world in the development of new curricula and doctoral programmes.

The Commission is asked to create an "Open Innovation" digital platform where European-wide policy problems can be posted, and ideas and solutions can be put forward by citizens and stakeholders across Europe.

(3) Simplification, defragmentation, financing and standardisation : the resolution calls for a greater emphasis on funding instruments with a leveraging effect on national research expenditure, on private investment, and on EIB funding, to promote coordination of efforts and to stimulate investment up to European target goals. It also stresses the need to support SMEs from the first stage of innovation until the end, so that they are able to innovate and can participate in European Support Programmes.

The Commission is particularly asked to:

combine existing aid schemes and supporting structures in order to move towards a simple and accessible system to accelerate innovation, to focus on the grand societal challenges and actively to prevent fragmentation and bureaucracy; set up a ‘one-stop shop’ in cooperation with the Member States, that is, a service counter where all stakeholders (especially innovative SMEs) – including local and regional government – can obtain information and apply for financial support or be linked up with potential partners; establish a single policy framework for supporting and financing innovation with uniform rules; link funding instruments more closely to demand-side innovation tools and to direct this support in greater extent to SMEs and start-up companies in need of early access to EU- or international markets.

Members propose that a European innovation financing fund should be set up to boost investment in innovative SMEs through risk sharing involving the harnessing of private resources. They call for a true "EU Venture Capital Single Market" and the further development of instruments and mechanisms for improving SMEs access to research and innovation services (such as innovation vouchers).

Recognising that research and innovation are the only sure means of achieving economic recovery in the EU, Members want the Commission to consider the possibility of establishing for Member States an interim binding minimum level of funding for research and technological development amounting to around 1% of GDP up to 2015.

(4) Single market and intellectual property : Members point out that the single European patent and the European Company Statute need to be adopted to promote the transition to extra-Community trade. They underline the need to reduce the costs of an EU patent and IPR and welcome the Commission revision of the Union trademark system.

The resolution welcomes the Commission proposal to develop a European knowledge market for IPR and licensing by the end of 2011, including facilitating access to unused intellectual properties, among others, by encouraging the formation of common patent platforms and patent pools.

Members ask for policies which encourage researchers to remain in the EU Member States and investment in research programmes which facilitate mobility and exchanges between researchers at international level.

More specifically, Parliament welcomes, meanwhile, the broad support in the Council for the enhanced cooperation procedure on a single EU patent to start in 2011.

The Commission is asked to come forward with legislative proposals required for the creation of a fully functioning Digital Single Market by 2015.

(5) Public procurement : Members ask Member States to Member States strategically to use public procurement (which represent 17% of the EU’s annual GDP) to address the societal challenges, to stimulate innovation and direct their public procurement budget towards innovative, sustainable and eco-efficient products, processes and services. When revising the legal framework on public procurement, the Commission is asked to (i) clarify and simplify the relevant rules and enable contracting authorities to make more transparent use of pre-commercial procurement; (ii) encourage the transparent inclusion of specified and veritable social, environmental, fair-trade and innovative criteria in public procurement.

Members emphasise that international reciprocity is needed in respect of access to public procurement markets.

(6) European Innovation Partnerships (EIPs) : Parliament welcomes the ‘European Innovation Partnerships’ intended to increase and coordinate investments in R&D as well as to better coordinate public procurement to speed up the introduction of innovations into the market. It welcomes the pilot project on active and healthy ageing, and asks the European Commission to promote and support other initiatives based on the principle of EIPs.

The resolution stresses that EIPs must: (i) not exceed the limited number of grand societal challenges and must be aligned with them; (ii) generate inspiration through ambitious but feasible targets, translated coherently into specific objectives; (iii) create sysnergies; (iv) be shared and coordinated among more than two policy fields (DGs) within the Commission; (v) ensure participation of all relevant public and private partners.

Documents
2011/05/12
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2011/05/11
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2011/04/27
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2011/04/27
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
Documents
2011/04/12
   EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
Details

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted an own-initiative report by Judith A. MERKIES (S&D, NL) in response to the Commission Communication setting out the main initiatives needed to create ‘Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative: Innovation Union’.

(1) An integrated and interdisciplinary approach : whilst welcoming the Innovation Union flagship initiative, the report calls for : i) a broad concept of innovation that goes beyond technological and product oriented innovation ; ii) involves all stakeholders, in particular enterprises, and highlights the various enabling roles of citizens, while realising a mindset change.

Members consider that innovation, in all fields of knowledge and of economic and social activity, must be guided by the criteria of public interest, improvement of quality of life, promotion of social wellbeing and preservation of the environment and the balance of nature.

The report underlines the importance of climate and energy-efficient and renewable technologies in the shift towards a sustainable global economy. The Commission is asked to define strategies on internationalisation and innovation in these sectors. Members also call for the adoption of an ambitious Eco-innovation Action Plan.

The committee recalls that innovation is not exclusively intended to meet major societal challenges but also plays a particularly important role in the manufacture of consumer-friendly and attractive products in the fields of leisure, technology, industry, culture and entertainment. Noting that the digital world and ICTs are engines of innovation, it wants the Commission and Member States to step up their implementation of high-speed internet.

Members stress that that the success of innovation and research policy is dependent upon:

strategic orientation, development, design and implementation of all policies and measures, , with the aim of contributing to and enhancing innovation in Europe; well-coordinated multidisciplinary cooperation and (financial) support at EU, Member State, regional and local level; maximum involvement of all relevant players, e.g. SMEs, industry, universities, research institutes, RTOs, governments, Civil Society Organizations and social partners; coordination, coherence and synergy among the different policy areas, actions and instruments, so as to prevent fragmentation and duplication; shaping a positive regulatory environment for innovation products in order to adapt to market needs; policy evaluation methodologies and processes, including peer review panels and dissemination of successful experiments.

(2) Citizen-centred Innovation Society: the Commission and Member States are invited to put serious effort into bringing about a change of mindset towards innovative and curiosity-driven thinking and risk-taking.

The report underlines the importance of the following:

steps to support initiatives aimed at promoting scientific dialogue and the dissemination of findings among the widest possible public, in addition to the scientific community; fostering the development at regional level of an innovation culture ; promoting research on social innovation and to provide public funds in support of it as well as public-private partnerships; modernising education systems and efforts to overcome skill shortages in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics; raising the level of lifelong learning and of developing training activities for all in order to enhance eco-innovativeness and entrepreneurship; promoting policies to strengthen cooperation between education systems and the business world in the development of new curricula and doctoral programmes. The Commission is asked to create an "Open Innovation" digital platform where European-wide policy problems can be posted, and ideas and solutions can be put forward by citizens and stakeholders across Europe.

(3) Simplification, defragmentation, financing and standardisation : the report calls for a greater emphasis on funding instruments with a leveraging effect on national research expenditure, on private investment, and on EIB funding, to promote coordination of efforts and to stimulate investment up to European target goals. It also stresses the need to support SMEs from the first stage of innovation until the end, so that they are able to innovate and can participate in European Support Programmes.

The Commission is particularly asked to:

combine existing aid schemes and supporting structures in order to move towards a simple and accessible system to accelerate innovation, to focus on the grand societal challenges and actively to prevent fragmentation and bureaucracy; set up a ‘one-stop shop’ in cooperation with the Member States, that is, a service counter where all stakeholders (especially innovative SMEs) – including local and regional government – can obtain information and apply for financial support or be linked up with potential partners; establish a single policy framework for supporting and financing innovation with uniform rules; link funding instruments more closely to demand-side innovation tools and to direct this support in greater extent to SMEs and start-up companies in need of early access to EU- or international markets.

Members propose that a European innovation financing fund should be set up to boost investment in innovative SMEs through risk sharing involving the harnessing of private resources. They call for a true "EU Venture Capital Single Market" and the further development of instruments and mechanisms for improving SMEs access to research and innovation services (such as innovation vouchers).

Recognising that research and innovation are the only sure means of achieving economic recovery in the EU, Members want the Commission to consider the possibility of establishing for Member States an interim binding minimum level of funding for research and technological development amounting to around 1% of GDP up to 2015.

(4) Single market and intellectual property : Members point out that the single European patent and the European Company Statute need to be adopted to promote the transition to extra-Community trade. They underline the need to reduce the costs of an EU patent and IPR and welcome the Commission revision of the Union trademark system.

The report welcomes the Commission proposal to develop a European knowledge market for IPR and licensing by the end of 2011, including facilitating access to unused intellectual properties, among others, by encouraging the formation of common patent platforms and patent pools.

Members ask for policies which encourage researchers to remain in the EU Member States and investment in research programmes which facilitate mobility and exchanges between researchers at international level.

The Commission is asked to come forward with legislative proposals required for the creation of a fully functioning Digital Single Market by 2015.

(5) Public procurement : Members ask Member States to Member States strategically to use public procurement (which represent 17% of the EU’s annual GDP) to address the societal challenges, to stimulate innovation and direct their public procurement budget towards innovative, sustainable and eco-efficient products, processes and services. When revising the legal framework on public procurement, the Commission is asked to (i) clarify and simplify the relevant rules and enable contracting authorities to make more transparent use of pre-commercial procurement; (ii) encourage the transparent inclusion of specified and veritable social, environmental, fair-trade and innovative criteria in public procurement

Members emphasise that international reciprocity is needed in respect of access to public procurement markets.

(6) European Innovation Partnerships (EIPs) : the committee welcomes the ‘European Innovation Partnerships’ intended to increase and coordinate investments in R&D as well as to better coordinate public procurement to speed up the introduction of innovations into the market. It welcomes the pilot project on active and healthy ageing, and asks the European Commission to promote and support other initiatives based on the principle of EIPs.

The report stresses that EIPs must: (i) not exceed the limited number of grand societal challenges and must be aligned with them; (ii) generate inspiration through ambitious but feasible targets, translated coherently into specific objectives; (iii) create sysnergies; (iv) be shared and coordinated among more than two policy fields (DGs) within the Commission; (v) ensure participation of all relevant public and private partners.

2011/03/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/03/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/03/23
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/03/18
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/03/17
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/03/17
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/03/08
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2011/03/08
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2011/03/03
   EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2011/02/09
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2011/01/21
   PT_PARLIAMENT - Contribution
Documents
2010/12/01
   EP - VAIDERE Inese (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in INTA
2010/12/01
   EP - TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO
2010/11/25
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
2010/11/23
   EP - BADIA I CUTCHET Maria (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in CULT
2010/11/09
   EP - FERREIRA João (GUE/NGL) appointed as rapporteur in ENVI
2010/10/28
   EP - HÜBNER Danuta Maria (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2010/10/27
   EP - WIKSTRÖM Cecilia (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in JURI
2010/10/21
   EP - ESSAYAH Sari (PPE) appointed as rapporteur in EMPL
2010/10/06
   EC - Non-legislative basic document published
Details

PURPOSE: Commission Communication presenting Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union.

BACKGROUND: this Communication begins by noting that Europe’s capacity to create millions of new jobs to replace those lost in the financial crisis, and its future standard of living depends on Europe’s ability to drive innovation in products, services, business and social processes and models. This is why innovation has been placed at the heart of the Europe 2020 strategy. The "Innovation Union" is one of the seven flagships announced in the Europe 2020 Strategy. The paper outlines both the potential in the EU and its weaknesses. The latter includes:

Under-investment in our knowledge foundation : the EU spends every year 0.8% of GDP less than the US and 1.5% less than Japan in R&D - with major gaps in business R&D, venture capital investments - and our education system needs reform. Countries like China and South Korea are catching up fast and moving from being imitators to leaders in innovation. Unlike the EU, they are pursuing a strategic approach to creating an innovation-friendly environment. Private sector R&D is increasingly outsourced to emerging economies and thousands of our best researchers and innovators have moved to countries where conditions are more favourable. According to recent estimates, achieving our target of spending 3% of EU GDP on R&D by 2020 could create 3.7 million jobs and increase annual GDP by close to EUR 800 billion by 2025. Too few of our innovative SMEs grow into large companies;

Unfavourable framework conditions : private investment in research and innovation is being held back and ideas prevented from reaching the market by poor availability of finance, costly patenting, market fragmentation, outdated regulations and procedures, slow standard-setting and the failure to use public procurement strategically. Moreover, barriers in the single market make it more difficult for different players to work together across border, using and sharing knowledge from all sources, which is increasingly how successful innovations are developed.

Fragmentation of effort : national and regional research and innovation systems are still working along separate tracks with only a marginal European dimension. This leads to costly duplication and overlap which is unacceptable at a time of tight finances. By better pooling our efforts and focusing on excellence, and by creating a true European Research Area, the EU can enhance the quality of research and Europe's potential for major breakthroughs and increase the effectiveness of the investments needed to get ideas to market.

CONTENT: the Communication addresses the challenges and opportunities facing Europe in key areas where urgent and sustained efforts are required. It sets out clearly the key European, national and regional initiatives needed to create the Innovation Union

Concretely, to achieve Innovation Union, the following is needed:

the EU and Member States need to continue to invest in education, R&D, innovation and ICTs. Such investments should where possible not only be protected from budget cuts, but should be stepped up; this should go hand in hand with reforms to get more value for money and tackle fragmentation. EU and national research & innovation systems need to be better linked up with each other and their performance improved; education systems at all levels need to be modernised. We need more world-class universities, raise skill levels and attract top talent from abroad; researchers and innovators must be able to work and cooperate across the EU as easily as within national borders. The European Research Area (ERA) must be completed within four years – putting in place the frameworks for a truly free movement of knowledge; access to EU programmes must be simplified and their leverage effect on private sector investment enhanced, with the support of the European Investment Bank. The role of the European Research Council should be reinforced. The framework programme's contribution to nurturing fast growing SMEs must be boosted. The European Regional Development Fund should be fully exploited to develop research and innovation capacities across Europe, based on smart regional specialisation strategies; we need to get more innovation out of our research. Cooperation between the worlds of science and the world of business must be enhanced, obstacles removed and incentives put in place; remaining barriers for entrepreneurs to bring "ideas to market" must be removed: better access to finance, particularly for SMEs, affordable Intellectual Property Rights, smarter and more ambitious regulation and targets, faster setting of interoperable standards and strategic use of our massive procurement budgets. As an immediate step, agreement should be reached on the EU patent before the end of the year; European Innovation Partnerships should be launched to accelerate research, development and market deployment of innovations to tackle major societal challenges, pool expertise and resources and boost the competitiveness of EU industry, starting with the area of healthy ageing; our strengths in design and creativity must be better exploited. We must champion social innovation. We must develop a better understanding of public sector innovation, identify and give visibility to successful initiatives, and benchmark progress; we need to work better with our international partners. That means opening access to our R&D programmes, while ensuring comparable conditions abroad. That also means adopting a common EU front where needed to protect our interests.

The Communication outlines a large number of actions and time-scales which are designed to meet these challenges. They include the following:

an integrated framework for the promotion of e-skills for innovation and competitiveness , based on partnerships with stakeholders; a European Research Area framework and supporting measures to remove obstacles to mobility and cross-border co-operation, aiming for them to be in force by end 2014; by 2015, Member States together with the Commission should have completed or launched the construction of 60% of the priority European research infrastructures currently identified by the European Strategy Forum for Research Infrastructures (ESFRI). The Commission will design future EU research and innovation programmes to ensure simple access and stronger involvement of SMEs, in particular those with a high growth potential; by mid 2011- the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) should set out a Strategic Innovation Agenda to expand its activities as a showcase for Innovation in Europe; by 2014: the EU should put in place financial instruments to attract a major increase in private finance and close the market gaps in investing in research and innovation. Contributions from the EU budget should create a major leverage effect and expand on the success of FP7 and CIP. The Commission will work with the European Investment Bank Group, national financial intermediaries and private investors to develop proposals addressing the following critical gaps: (i) investment in knowledge transfer and start ups; (ii) venture capital for fast growing firms expanding on EU and global markets; (iii) risk sharing finance for investments in R&D and innovation projects; and (iv) loans for innovative fast growing SMEs and midcaps; by 2012, the Commission will ensure that Venture Capital funds established in any Member State can function and invest freely in the EU (if necessary by adopting a new legislative regime). It will endeavour to eliminate any tax treatment unfavourable to cross-border activities; the European Parliament and Council should take the necessary steps to adopt the proposals on the EU patent , its linguistic regime and the unified system of dispute settlement. The objective is that the first EU patents are delivered in 2014;

Member States are invited to carry out self assessments based on the policy features identified in the Annex and identify key challenges and critical reforms as part of their National Reform Programmes.

Lastly, the European Parliament is invited to give priority to Innovation Union proposals and initiatives, including the identification and success of the European Innovation Partnerships. The Commission would welcome the Parliament holding once a year a major policy debate on progress with representatives of national parliaments and stakeholders, to identify key messages and to keep the Innovation Union high on the political agenda.

2010/09/29
   EP - MERKIES Judith A. (S&D) appointed as rapporteur in ITRE

Documents

Activities

AmendmentsDossier
556 2010/2245(INI)
2011/02/02 CULT 34 amendments...
source: PE-456.908
2011/02/15 INTA 36 amendments...
source: PE-458.746
2011/02/16 EMPL 42 amendments...
source: PE-458.657
2011/02/21 ENVI 37 amendments...
source: PE-458.831
2011/03/03 IMCO 49 amendments...
source: PE-458.836
2011/03/04 REGI 56 amendments...
source: PE-460.743
2011/03/08 ITRE 302 amendments...
source: PE-460.774

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
rapporteur
name: MERKIES Judith A. date: 2010-09-29T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2010-09-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MERKIES Judith A. group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
rapporteur
name: VAIDERE Inese date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2010-12-01T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAIDERE Inese group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
rapporteur
name: ESSAYAH Sari date: 2010-10-21T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2010-10-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ESSAYAH Sari group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
rapporteur
name: FERREIRA João date: 2010-11-09T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2010-11-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FERREIRA João group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
rapporteur
name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2010-12-01T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
rapporteur
name: HÜBNER Danuta Maria date: 2010-10-28T00:00:00 group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2010-10-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HÜBNER Danuta Maria group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
rapporteur
name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria date: 2010-11-23T00:00:00 group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2010-11-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
rapporteur
name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2010-10-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
docs/10/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-162&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0162_EN.html
docs/11/body
EC
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-162&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2011-0162_EN.html
events/6/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-236
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2011-0236_EN.html
activities
  • date: 2010-10-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0546/COM_COM(2010)0546_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0546 type: Non-legislative basic document published celexid: CELEX:52010DC0546:EN body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/research/home.cfm title: Research and Innovation Commissioner: GEOGHEGAN-QUINN Máire type: Non-legislative basic document published
  • date: 2010-11-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2010-11-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-10-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ESSAYAH Sari body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-11-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: FERREIRA João body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE name: VAIDERE Inese body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: SARTORI Amalia group: ALDE name: CHATZIMARKAKIS Jorgo group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: Verts/ALE name: LAMBERTS Philippe group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2010-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: MERKIES Judith A. body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2010-10-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: HÜBNER Danuta Maria
  • date: 2011-04-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2010-11-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-10-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ESSAYAH Sari body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-11-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: FERREIRA João body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE name: VAIDERE Inese body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: SARTORI Amalia group: ALDE name: CHATZIMARKAKIS Jorgo group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: Verts/ALE name: LAMBERTS Philippe group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2010-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: MERKIES Judith A. body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2010-10-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: HÜBNER Danuta Maria type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2011-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-162&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0162/2011 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110511&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-05-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20026&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-236 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0236/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Research and Innovation commissioner: GEOGHEGAN-QUINN Máire
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
committee
ITRE
date
2010-09-29T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: MERKIES Judith A. group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
CULT
date
2010-11-23T00:00:00
committee_full
Culture and Education
rapporteur
group: S&D name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria
committees/1
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
International Trade
committee
INTA
date
2010-12-01T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: VAIDERE Inese group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/1
body
EP
responsible
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
committees/2
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Economic and Monetary Affairs
committee
ECON
opinion
False
committees/2
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
EMPL
date
2010-10-21T00:00:00
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
rapporteur
group: PPE name: ESSAYAH Sari
committees/3
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Employment and Social Affairs
committee
EMPL
date
2010-10-21T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: ESSAYAH Sari group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/3
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
ENVI
date
2010-11-09T00:00:00
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: FERREIRA João
committees/4
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Environment, Public Health and Food Safety
committee
ENVI
date
2010-11-09T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: FERREIRA João group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/4
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
IMCO
date
2010-12-01T00:00:00
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
rapporteur
group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos
committees/5
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Internal Market and Consumer Protection
committee
IMCO
date
2010-12-01T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos group: European United Left - Nordic Green Left abbr: GUE/NGL
committees/5
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
INTA
date
2010-12-01T00:00:00
committee_full
International Trade
rapporteur
group: PPE name: VAIDERE Inese
committees/6
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Regional Development
committee
REGI
date
2010-10-28T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: HÜBNER Danuta Maria group: European People's Party (Christian Democrats) abbr: PPE
committees/6
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
ITRE
date
2010-09-29T00:00:00
committee_full
Industry, Research and Energy
rapporteur
group: S&D name: MERKIES Judith A.
committees/7
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Culture and Education
committee
CULT
date
2010-11-23T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria group: Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats abbr: S&D
committees/7
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
JURI
date
2010-10-27T00:00:00
committee_full
Legal Affairs
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia
committees/8
type
Committee Opinion
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Legal Affairs
committee
JURI
date
2010-10-27T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
committees/8
body
EP
responsible
False
committee
REGI
date
2010-10-28T00:00:00
committee_full
Regional Development
rapporteur
group: PPE name: HÜBNER Danuta Maria
docs
  • date: 2011-02-09T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE456.700 title: PE456.700 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2011-03-03T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.379&secondRef=02 title: PE454.379 committee: CULT type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE460.664 title: PE460.664 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2011-03-08T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE460.774 title: PE460.774 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
  • date: 2011-03-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE456.869&secondRef=02 title: PE456.869 committee: INTA type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-03-17T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE458.493&secondRef=02 title: PE458.493 committee: ENVI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-03-18T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE456.694&secondRef=02 title: PE456.694 committee: EMPL type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE454.702&secondRef=02 title: PE454.702 committee: JURI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE456.879&secondRef=03 title: PE456.879 committee: IMCO type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-03-23T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE458.643&secondRef=02 title: PE458.643 committee: REGI type: Committee opinion body: EP
  • date: 2011-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-162&language=EN title: A7-0162/2011 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP
  • date: 2011-09-19T00:00:00 docs: url: /oeil/spdoc.do?i=20026&j=0&l=en title: SP(2011)6333/2 type: Commission response to text adopted in plenary
  • date: 2011-12-02T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0849/COM_COM(2011)0849_EN.doc title: COM(2011)0849 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=849 title: EUR-Lex summary: The Commission presents a report on the State of Innovation Union 2011. Innovation Union is an integrated flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 strategy, built around 34 specific commitments and aims at ensuring that innovative ideas are translated into new goods and services that create growth and jobs. The report sets out the background, stating that the first year of Innovation Union has seen the economic and financial crisis reaching a new phase, and the pressure to cut investments is huge. At the same time, the shift in economic power from West to East is accelerating. Both the Innovation Union Scoreboard and the Innovation Union Competitiveness report highlight the fact that Europe’s research and innovation performance has declined over recent years. This report focuses on key policy actions of 2011, and provides an overview on the state of play of all 34 commitments of the Innovation Union. Progress: overall, good progress has been made in launching the 34 Innovation Union commitments. Legislative proposals have been tabled according to plan and pilot actions have been launched and tested. Out of the 34 Innovation Union commitments, two have not been taken up : at national level, dedicating procurement budgets to innovative products and services and, at EU level, consulting social partners on bringing the knowledge economy to all occupational levels. Two more actions are delayed: regulatory screening and the eco-innovation action plan. The Commission will step up its efforts to launch the delayed activities promptly and calls on Member States to intensify their efforts to drive demand for innovative solutions through public procurement. The paper also makes the following points: - the Commission is proposing to increase investments in research, innovation and education in support of the EU's pro-growth agenda. The Horizon 2020 proposal enacts many of the Innovation Union commitments; - there has been good track record on putting in place the conditions that will smooth the path from idea to market. In particular, the Commission has already tabled legislative proposals for unitary patent protection and for modernising standard-setting ; - the Commission will put forward measures for completing European Research Area by 2014, and expects to present a proposal in mid-2012; The challenge for the next implementation phase will be that all actors take collective responsibility for Innovation Union delivery, adopt the proposals tabled by the Commission and translate firm political commitments into action both at national and at EU level. Action at national level: the success of Innovation Union will depend on the extent to which it can mobilise action at national and regional level. Overall, the National Reform Programmes include a breadth of measures that offer a good starting point for stimulating innovation. However, national programmes often lack ambition and specificity. Additional efforts are needed to reach the EU’s 3 % R&D target and Member States need to do more to protect and prioritise expenditure on research and education and the key infrastructures to sustain future growth. A few trends could be detected from the announced reforms with respect to research and innovation: · a majority of Member States are in the process of improving their governance structures and strategic guidance for research and innovation, which is often accompanied by a gradual integration of the two policy fields and increased targeting of public funding on selected areas. At this stage, however, very few countries are explicitly targeting societal challenges as their main priority; · a majority of Member States are engaged in improving framework conditions or financial support for research and innovation, in particular through R&D tax incentives, and different forms of support to innovative SMEs, including venture capital. An increasing number of Member States are paying attention to demand-side innovation policy instruments, in particular public procurement. So far, only a few countries have an approach that seeks to integrate demand- and supply-side instruments; · in terms of budgets allocated to R&D, only a limited number of Member States — including Denmark, France, Germany and Sweden — have launched new funding initiatives, while some others such as Slovenia are earmarking a substantial share of Structural Funds for research and innovation. It appears that countries committed to increasing their R&D funding are also the ones which consider the broadest spectrum of growth-enhancing measures in line with the Innovation Union areas of action, and are already high or aspiring innovation performers. There is clearly a risk of widening the innovation divide between the Member States . It is important that modest innovators sustain their recent positive commitments and the middle-of-the-range innovators are urged not to decrease further their R&D public investments and to start planning to recover lost momentum. Only in this way can Europe meet its ambition on research and innovation targets. Member States are invited to do more to prioritise research and innovation investments and turn into action political commitments undertaken in 2011, especially on pursuing reforms aimed at boosting the effectiveness of their research and innovation systems and improving the use of Structural Funds for research and innovation. EU funding for research and innovation: in its proposal for a Budget for Europe 2020 , the Commission envisages substantial re-orientation of the future EU budget towards research and innovation, bringing together current research and innovation programmes into a single strategic framework — Horizon 2020 — to fund the whole innovation cycle. Many of the Innovation Union commitments are enacted upon through Horizon 2020, notably: more focus on societal challenges, a strengthened approach to SMEs, and stronger support to market uptake of innovation, including by means of procurements, standard-setting and loan and equity financing. A number of simplification measures for the current Framework Programme (FP7) have already been introduced early 2011, and Horizon 2020 will show more far-reaching simplification. In parallel, the existing EU research and innovation funding is already being focused on Innovation Union priorities. The Commission is piloting new approaches with Horizon 2020 in mind. Future action: For 2012, the Commission will continue delivering the Innovation Union, notably by presenting the two remaining Innovation Union initiatives scheduled for 2012, i.e. the proposal for the European Research Area Framework and the new headline indicator. It will also present an external evaluation by the newly created European Research and Innovation Advisory Board. In tandem with the innovation policy measures under way, the Commission will review the current approaches to innovation in other EU policies and propose strategies to mainstream innovation into all EU policies. type: Follow-up document body: EC
  • date: 2011-01-21T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0546 title: COM(2010)0546 type: Contribution body: PT_PARLIAMENT
  • date: 2011-07-07T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.connefof.europarl.europa.eu/connefof/app/exp/COM(2010)0546 title: COM(2010)0546 type: Contribution body: UK_HOUSE-OF-LORDS
events
  • date: 2010-10-06T00:00:00 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0546/COM_COM(2010)0546_EN.pdf title: COM(2010)0546 url: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2010&nu_doc=546 title: EUR-Lex summary: PURPOSE: Commission Communication presenting Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative Innovation Union. BACKGROUND: this Communication begins by noting that Europe’s capacity to create millions of new jobs to replace those lost in the financial crisis, and its future standard of living depends on Europe’s ability to drive innovation in products, services, business and social processes and models. This is why innovation has been placed at the heart of the Europe 2020 strategy. The "Innovation Union" is one of the seven flagships announced in the Europe 2020 Strategy. The paper outlines both the potential in the EU and its weaknesses. The latter includes: Under-investment in our knowledge foundation : the EU spends every year 0.8% of GDP less than the US and 1.5% less than Japan in R&D - with major gaps in business R&D, venture capital investments - and our education system needs reform. Countries like China and South Korea are catching up fast and moving from being imitators to leaders in innovation. Unlike the EU, they are pursuing a strategic approach to creating an innovation-friendly environment. Private sector R&D is increasingly outsourced to emerging economies and thousands of our best researchers and innovators have moved to countries where conditions are more favourable. According to recent estimates, achieving our target of spending 3% of EU GDP on R&D by 2020 could create 3.7 million jobs and increase annual GDP by close to EUR 800 billion by 2025. Too few of our innovative SMEs grow into large companies; Unfavourable framework conditions : private investment in research and innovation is being held back and ideas prevented from reaching the market by poor availability of finance, costly patenting, market fragmentation, outdated regulations and procedures, slow standard-setting and the failure to use public procurement strategically. Moreover, barriers in the single market make it more difficult for different players to work together across border, using and sharing knowledge from all sources, which is increasingly how successful innovations are developed. Fragmentation of effort : national and regional research and innovation systems are still working along separate tracks with only a marginal European dimension. This leads to costly duplication and overlap which is unacceptable at a time of tight finances. By better pooling our efforts and focusing on excellence, and by creating a true European Research Area, the EU can enhance the quality of research and Europe's potential for major breakthroughs and increase the effectiveness of the investments needed to get ideas to market. CONTENT: the Communication addresses the challenges and opportunities facing Europe in key areas where urgent and sustained efforts are required. It sets out clearly the key European, national and regional initiatives needed to create the Innovation Union Concretely, to achieve Innovation Union, the following is needed: the EU and Member States need to continue to invest in education, R&D, innovation and ICTs. Such investments should where possible not only be protected from budget cuts, but should be stepped up; this should go hand in hand with reforms to get more value for money and tackle fragmentation. EU and national research & innovation systems need to be better linked up with each other and their performance improved; education systems at all levels need to be modernised. We need more world-class universities, raise skill levels and attract top talent from abroad; researchers and innovators must be able to work and cooperate across the EU as easily as within national borders. The European Research Area (ERA) must be completed within four years – putting in place the frameworks for a truly free movement of knowledge; access to EU programmes must be simplified and their leverage effect on private sector investment enhanced, with the support of the European Investment Bank. The role of the European Research Council should be reinforced. The framework programme's contribution to nurturing fast growing SMEs must be boosted. The European Regional Development Fund should be fully exploited to develop research and innovation capacities across Europe, based on smart regional specialisation strategies; we need to get more innovation out of our research. Cooperation between the worlds of science and the world of business must be enhanced, obstacles removed and incentives put in place; remaining barriers for entrepreneurs to bring "ideas to market" must be removed: better access to finance, particularly for SMEs, affordable Intellectual Property Rights, smarter and more ambitious regulation and targets, faster setting of interoperable standards and strategic use of our massive procurement budgets. As an immediate step, agreement should be reached on the EU patent before the end of the year; European Innovation Partnerships should be launched to accelerate research, development and market deployment of innovations to tackle major societal challenges, pool expertise and resources and boost the competitiveness of EU industry, starting with the area of healthy ageing; our strengths in design and creativity must be better exploited. We must champion social innovation. We must develop a better understanding of public sector innovation, identify and give visibility to successful initiatives, and benchmark progress; we need to work better with our international partners. That means opening access to our R&D programmes, while ensuring comparable conditions abroad. That also means adopting a common EU front where needed to protect our interests. The Communication outlines a large number of actions and time-scales which are designed to meet these challenges. They include the following: an integrated framework for the promotion of e-skills for innovation and competitiveness , based on partnerships with stakeholders; a European Research Area framework and supporting measures to remove obstacles to mobility and cross-border co-operation, aiming for them to be in force by end 2014; by 2015, Member States together with the Commission should have completed or launched the construction of 60% of the priority European research infrastructures currently identified by the European Strategy Forum for Research Infrastructures (ESFRI). The Commission will design future EU research and innovation programmes to ensure simple access and stronger involvement of SMEs, in particular those with a high growth potential; by mid 2011- the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) should set out a Strategic Innovation Agenda to expand its activities as a showcase for Innovation in Europe; by 2014: the EU should put in place financial instruments to attract a major increase in private finance and close the market gaps in investing in research and innovation. Contributions from the EU budget should create a major leverage effect and expand on the success of FP7 and CIP. The Commission will work with the European Investment Bank Group, national financial intermediaries and private investors to develop proposals addressing the following critical gaps: (i) investment in knowledge transfer and start ups; (ii) venture capital for fast growing firms expanding on EU and global markets; (iii) risk sharing finance for investments in R&D and innovation projects; and (iv) loans for innovative fast growing SMEs and midcaps; by 2012, the Commission will ensure that Venture Capital funds established in any Member State can function and invest freely in the EU (if necessary by adopting a new legislative regime). It will endeavour to eliminate any tax treatment unfavourable to cross-border activities; the European Parliament and Council should take the necessary steps to adopt the proposals on the EU patent , its linguistic regime and the unified system of dispute settlement. The objective is that the first EU patents are delivered in 2014; Member States are invited to carry out self assessments based on the policy features identified in the Annex and identify key challenges and critical reforms as part of their National Reform Programmes. Lastly, the European Parliament is invited to give priority to Innovation Union proposals and initiatives, including the identification and success of the European Innovation Partnerships. The Commission would welcome the Parliament holding once a year a major policy debate on progress with representatives of national parliaments and stakeholders, to identify key messages and to keep the Innovation Union high on the political agenda.
  • date: 2010-11-25T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2011-04-12T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP summary: The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy adopted an own-initiative report by Judith A. MERKIES (S&D, NL) in response to the Commission Communication setting out the main initiatives needed to create ‘Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative: Innovation Union’. (1) An integrated and interdisciplinary approach : whilst welcoming the Innovation Union flagship initiative, the report calls for : i) a broad concept of innovation that goes beyond technological and product oriented innovation ; ii) involves all stakeholders, in particular enterprises, and highlights the various enabling roles of citizens, while realising a mindset change. Members consider that innovation, in all fields of knowledge and of economic and social activity, must be guided by the criteria of public interest, improvement of quality of life, promotion of social wellbeing and preservation of the environment and the balance of nature. The report underlines the importance of climate and energy-efficient and renewable technologies in the shift towards a sustainable global economy. The Commission is asked to define strategies on internationalisation and innovation in these sectors. Members also call for the adoption of an ambitious Eco-innovation Action Plan. The committee recalls that innovation is not exclusively intended to meet major societal challenges but also plays a particularly important role in the manufacture of consumer-friendly and attractive products in the fields of leisure, technology, industry, culture and entertainment. Noting that the digital world and ICTs are engines of innovation, it wants the Commission and Member States to step up their implementation of high-speed internet. Members stress that that the success of innovation and research policy is dependent upon: strategic orientation, development, design and implementation of all policies and measures, , with the aim of contributing to and enhancing innovation in Europe; well-coordinated multidisciplinary cooperation and (financial) support at EU, Member State, regional and local level; maximum involvement of all relevant players, e.g. SMEs, industry, universities, research institutes, RTOs, governments, Civil Society Organizations and social partners; coordination, coherence and synergy among the different policy areas, actions and instruments, so as to prevent fragmentation and duplication; shaping a positive regulatory environment for innovation products in order to adapt to market needs; policy evaluation methodologies and processes, including peer review panels and dissemination of successful experiments. (2) Citizen-centred Innovation Society: the Commission and Member States are invited to put serious effort into bringing about a change of mindset towards innovative and curiosity-driven thinking and risk-taking. The report underlines the importance of the following: steps to support initiatives aimed at promoting scientific dialogue and the dissemination of findings among the widest possible public, in addition to the scientific community; fostering the development at regional level of an innovation culture ; promoting research on social innovation and to provide public funds in support of it as well as public-private partnerships; modernising education systems and efforts to overcome skill shortages in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics; raising the level of lifelong learning and of developing training activities for all in order to enhance eco-innovativeness and entrepreneurship; promoting policies to strengthen cooperation between education systems and the business world in the development of new curricula and doctoral programmes. The Commission is asked to create an "Open Innovation" digital platform where European-wide policy problems can be posted, and ideas and solutions can be put forward by citizens and stakeholders across Europe. (3) Simplification, defragmentation, financing and standardisation : the report calls for a greater emphasis on funding instruments with a leveraging effect on national research expenditure, on private investment, and on EIB funding, to promote coordination of efforts and to stimulate investment up to European target goals. It also stresses the need to support SMEs from the first stage of innovation until the end, so that they are able to innovate and can participate in European Support Programmes. The Commission is particularly asked to: combine existing aid schemes and supporting structures in order to move towards a simple and accessible system to accelerate innovation, to focus on the grand societal challenges and actively to prevent fragmentation and bureaucracy; set up a ‘one-stop shop’ in cooperation with the Member States, that is, a service counter where all stakeholders (especially innovative SMEs) – including local and regional government – can obtain information and apply for financial support or be linked up with potential partners; establish a single policy framework for supporting and financing innovation with uniform rules; link funding instruments more closely to demand-side innovation tools and to direct this support in greater extent to SMEs and start-up companies in need of early access to EU- or international markets. Members propose that a European innovation financing fund should be set up to boost investment in innovative SMEs through risk sharing involving the harnessing of private resources. They call for a true "EU Venture Capital Single Market" and the further development of instruments and mechanisms for improving SMEs access to research and innovation services (such as innovation vouchers). Recognising that research and innovation are the only sure means of achieving economic recovery in the EU, Members want the Commission to consider the possibility of establishing for Member States an interim binding minimum level of funding for research and technological development amounting to around 1% of GDP up to 2015. (4) Single market and intellectual property : Members point out that the single European patent and the European Company Statute need to be adopted to promote the transition to extra-Community trade. They underline the need to reduce the costs of an EU patent and IPR and welcome the Commission revision of the Union trademark system. The report welcomes the Commission proposal to develop a European knowledge market for IPR and licensing by the end of 2011, including facilitating access to unused intellectual properties, among others, by encouraging the formation of common patent platforms and patent pools. Members ask for policies which encourage researchers to remain in the EU Member States and investment in research programmes which facilitate mobility and exchanges between researchers at international level. The Commission is asked to come forward with legislative proposals required for the creation of a fully functioning Digital Single Market by 2015. (5) Public procurement : Members ask Member States to Member States strategically to use public procurement (which represent 17% of the EU’s annual GDP) to address the societal challenges, to stimulate innovation and direct their public procurement budget towards innovative, sustainable and eco-efficient products, processes and services. When revising the legal framework on public procurement, the Commission is asked to (i) clarify and simplify the relevant rules and enable contracting authorities to make more transparent use of pre-commercial procurement; (ii) encourage the transparent inclusion of specified and veritable social, environmental, fair-trade and innovative criteria in public procurement Members emphasise that international reciprocity is needed in respect of access to public procurement markets. (6) European Innovation Partnerships (EIPs) : the committee welcomes the ‘European Innovation Partnerships’ intended to increase and coordinate investments in R&D as well as to better coordinate public procurement to speed up the introduction of innovations into the market. It welcomes the pilot project on active and healthy ageing, and asks the European Commission to promote and support other initiatives based on the principle of EIPs. The report stresses that EIPs must: (i) not exceed the limited number of grand societal challenges and must be aligned with them; (ii) generate inspiration through ambitious but feasible targets, translated coherently into specific objectives; (iii) create sysnergies; (iv) be shared and coordinated among more than two policy fields (DGs) within the Commission; (v) ensure participation of all relevant public and private partners.
  • date: 2011-04-27T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-162&language=EN title: A7-0162/2011
  • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110511&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-05-12T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20026&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2011-05-12T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-236 title: T7-0236/2011 summary: The European Parliament adopted a resolution on Innovation Union: transforming Europe for a post-crisis world, in response to the Commission Communication setting out the main initiatives needed to create ‘Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative: Innovation Union’. (1) An integrated and interdisciplinary approach : whilst welcoming the Innovation Union flagship initiative, the resolution calls for : (i) a broad concept of innovation that goes beyond technological and product oriented innovation ; (ii) involves all stakeholders, in particular enterprises, and highlights the various enabling roles of citizens, while realising a mindset change. Parliament considers that innovation, in all fields of knowledge and of economic and social activity, must be guided by the criteria of public interest, improvement of quality of life, promotion of social wellbeing and preservation of the environment and the balance of nature. The resolution underlines the importance of climate and energy-efficient and renewable technologies in the shift towards a sustainable global economy. The Commission is asked to define strategies on internationalisation and innovation in these sectors. Members also call for the adoption of an ambitious Eco-innovation Action Plan. Parliament recalls that innovation is not exclusively intended to meet major societal challenges but also plays a particularly important role in the manufacture of consumer-friendly and attractive products in the fields of leisure, technology, industry, culture and entertainment. Noting that the digital world and ICTs are engines of innovation, it wants the Commission and Member States to step up their implementation of high-speed internet. Members stress that that the success of innovation and research policy is dependent upon: strategic orientation, development, design and implementation of all policies and measures, with the aim of contributing to and enhancing innovation in Europe; well-coordinated multidisciplinary cooperation and (financial) support at EU, Member State, regional and local level; maximum involvement of all relevant players, e.g. SMEs, industry, universities, research institutes, RTOs, governments, Civil Society Organizations and social partners; coordination, coherence and synergy among the different policy areas, actions and instruments, so as to prevent fragmentation and duplication; shaping a positive regulatory environment for innovation products in order to adapt to market needs; policy evaluation methodologies and processes, including peer review panels and dissemination of successful experiments. (2) Citizen-centred Innovation Society : the Commission and Member States are invited to put serious effort into bringing about a change of mindset towards innovative and curiosity-driven thinking and risk-taking. The resolution underlines the importance of the following: steps to support initiatives aimed at promoting scientific dialogue and the dissemination of findings among the widest possible public, in addition to the scientific community; fostering the development at regional level of an innovation culture ; promoting research on social innovation and to provide public funds in support of it as well as public-private partnerships; modernising education systems and efforts to overcome skill shortages in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics; raising the level of lifelong learning and of developing training activities for all in order to enhance eco-innovativeness and entrepreneurship; promoting policies to strengthen cooperation between education systems and the business world in the development of new curricula and doctoral programmes. The Commission is asked to create an "Open Innovation" digital platform where European-wide policy problems can be posted, and ideas and solutions can be put forward by citizens and stakeholders across Europe. (3) Simplification, defragmentation, financing and standardisation : the resolution calls for a greater emphasis on funding instruments with a leveraging effect on national research expenditure, on private investment, and on EIB funding, to promote coordination of efforts and to stimulate investment up to European target goals. It also stresses the need to support SMEs from the first stage of innovation until the end, so that they are able to innovate and can participate in European Support Programmes. The Commission is particularly asked to: combine existing aid schemes and supporting structures in order to move towards a simple and accessible system to accelerate innovation, to focus on the grand societal challenges and actively to prevent fragmentation and bureaucracy; set up a ‘one-stop shop’ in cooperation with the Member States, that is, a service counter where all stakeholders (especially innovative SMEs) – including local and regional government – can obtain information and apply for financial support or be linked up with potential partners; establish a single policy framework for supporting and financing innovation with uniform rules; link funding instruments more closely to demand-side innovation tools and to direct this support in greater extent to SMEs and start-up companies in need of early access to EU- or international markets. Members propose that a European innovation financing fund should be set up to boost investment in innovative SMEs through risk sharing involving the harnessing of private resources. They call for a true "EU Venture Capital Single Market" and the further development of instruments and mechanisms for improving SMEs access to research and innovation services (such as innovation vouchers). Recognising that research and innovation are the only sure means of achieving economic recovery in the EU, Members want the Commission to consider the possibility of establishing for Member States an interim binding minimum level of funding for research and technological development amounting to around 1% of GDP up to 2015. (4) Single market and intellectual property : Members point out that the single European patent and the European Company Statute need to be adopted to promote the transition to extra-Community trade. They underline the need to reduce the costs of an EU patent and IPR and welcome the Commission revision of the Union trademark system. The resolution welcomes the Commission proposal to develop a European knowledge market for IPR and licensing by the end of 2011, including facilitating access to unused intellectual properties, among others, by encouraging the formation of common patent platforms and patent pools. Members ask for policies which encourage researchers to remain in the EU Member States and investment in research programmes which facilitate mobility and exchanges between researchers at international level. More specifically, Parliament welcomes, meanwhile, the broad support in the Council for the enhanced cooperation procedure on a single EU patent to start in 2011. The Commission is asked to come forward with legislative proposals required for the creation of a fully functioning Digital Single Market by 2015. (5) Public procurement : Members ask Member States to Member States strategically to use public procurement (which represent 17% of the EU’s annual GDP) to address the societal challenges, to stimulate innovation and direct their public procurement budget towards innovative, sustainable and eco-efficient products, processes and services. When revising the legal framework on public procurement, the Commission is asked to (i) clarify and simplify the relevant rules and enable contracting authorities to make more transparent use of pre-commercial procurement; (ii) encourage the transparent inclusion of specified and veritable social, environmental, fair-trade and innovative criteria in public procurement. Members emphasise that international reciprocity is needed in respect of access to public procurement markets. (6) European Innovation Partnerships (EIPs) : Parliament welcomes the ‘European Innovation Partnerships’ intended to increase and coordinate investments in R&D as well as to better coordinate public procurement to speed up the introduction of innovations into the market. It welcomes the pilot project on active and healthy ageing, and asks the European Commission to promote and support other initiatives based on the principle of EIPs. The resolution stresses that EIPs must: (i) not exceed the limited number of grand societal challenges and must be aligned with them; (ii) generate inspiration through ambitious but feasible targets, translated coherently into specific objectives; (iii) create sysnergies; (iv) be shared and coordinated among more than two policy fields (DGs) within the Commission; (v) ensure participation of all relevant public and private partners.
  • date: 2011-05-12T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/research/home.cfm title: Research and Innovation commissioner: GEOGHEGAN-QUINN Máire
procedure/Modified legal basis
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
New
Rules of Procedure EP 150
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
ITRE/7/04342
New
  • ITRE/7/04342
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.40.14 Industrial competitiveness
  • 3.45 Enterprise policy, inter-company cooperation
  • 3.50.01 European research area and policy
  • 3.50.04 Innovation
  • 3.50.15 Intellectual property, copyright
  • 3.50.16 Industrial property, European patent, Community patent, design and pattern
  • 3.50.20 Scientific and technological cooperation and agreements
  • 4.40.01 European area for education, training and lifelong learning
  • 4.70.07 European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  • 8.40.07 European Investment Bank
New
3.40.14
Industrial competitiveness
3.45
Enterprise policy, inter-company cooperation
3.50.01
European research area and policy
3.50.04
Innovation
3.50.15
Intellectual property, copyright
3.50.16
Industrial property, European patent, Community patent, design and pattern
3.50.20
Scientific and technological cooperation and agreements
4.40.01
European area for education, training and lifelong learning
4.70.07
European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
8.40.07
European Investment Bank (EIB)
activities/1/committees/6/rapporteur/0/mepref
545fe675d1d1c56de6000000
activities/2/committees/6/rapporteur/0/mepref
545fe675d1d1c56de6000000
committees/6/rapporteur/0/mepref
545fe675d1d1c56de6000000
activities
  • date: 2010-10-06T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2010/0546/COM_COM(2010)0546_EN.pdf celexid: CELEX:52010DC0546:EN type: Non-legislative basic document published title: COM(2010)0546 type: Non-legislative basic document published body: EC commission: DG: url: http://ec.europa.eu/research/home.cfm title: Research and Innovation Commissioner: GEOGHEGAN-QUINN Máire
  • date: 2010-11-25T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2010-11-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-10-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ESSAYAH Sari body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-11-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: FERREIRA João body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE name: VAIDERE Inese body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: SARTORI Amalia group: ALDE name: CHATZIMARKAKIS Jorgo group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: Verts/ALE name: LAMBERTS Philippe group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2010-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: MERKIES Judith A. body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2010-10-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: HÜBNER Danuta Maria
  • date: 2011-04-12T00:00:00 body: EP committees: body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2010-11-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-10-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ESSAYAH Sari body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-11-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: FERREIRA João body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE name: VAIDERE Inese body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: SARTORI Amalia group: ALDE name: CHATZIMARKAKIS Jorgo group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: Verts/ALE name: LAMBERTS Philippe group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2010-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: MERKIES Judith A. body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2010-10-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: HÜBNER Danuta Maria type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
  • date: 2011-04-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2011-162&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A7-0162/2011 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2011-05-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20110511&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2011-05-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=20026&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2011-236 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T7-0236/2011 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
committees
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: CULT date: 2010-11-23T00:00:00 committee_full: Culture and Education rapporteur: group: S&D name: BADIA I CUTCHET Maria
  • body: EP responsible: False committee_full: Economic and Monetary Affairs committee: ECON
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: EMPL date: 2010-10-21T00:00:00 committee_full: Employment and Social Affairs rapporteur: group: PPE name: ESSAYAH Sari
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: ENVI date: 2010-11-09T00:00:00 committee_full: Environment, Public Health and Food Safety rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: FERREIRA João
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: IMCO date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: Internal Market and Consumer Protection rapporteur: group: GUE/NGL name: TRIANTAPHYLLIDES Kyriacos
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: INTA date: 2010-12-01T00:00:00 committee_full: International Trade rapporteur: group: PPE name: VAIDERE Inese
  • body: EP shadows: group: PPE name: SARTORI Amalia group: ALDE name: CHATZIMARKAKIS Jorgo group: Verts/ALE name: BÜTIKOFER Reinhard group: Verts/ALE name: LAMBERTS Philippe group: ECR name: TOŠENOVSKÝ Evžen group: GUE/NGL name: MATIAS Marisa group: EFD name: TZAVELA Niki responsible: True committee: ITRE date: 2010-09-29T00:00:00 committee_full: Industry, Research and Energy rapporteur: group: S&D name: MERKIES Judith A.
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: JURI date: 2010-10-27T00:00:00 committee_full: Legal Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: WIKSTRÖM Cecilia
  • body: EP responsible: False committee: REGI date: 2010-10-28T00:00:00 committee_full: Regional Development rapporteur: group: PPE name: HÜBNER Danuta Maria
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/research/home.cfm title: Research and Innovation commissioner: GEOGHEGAN-QUINN Máire
procedure
dossier_of_the_committee
ITRE/7/04342
reference
2010/2245(INI)
title
Innovation Union: transforming Europe for a post-crisis world
legal_basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
stage_reached
Procedure completed
subtype
Strategic initiative
Modified legal basis
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 150
type
INI - Own-initiative procedure
subject