12 Amendments of Arnaud DANJEAN related to 2018/2004(INI)
Amendment 21 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital A a (new)
Recital A a (new)
Aa. whereas repeated cyber-attacks have revealed vulnerabilities in networks that are essential to EU security; whereas these attacks make stepping up the defence and development of EU offensive and defensive capabilities a matter of priority;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital O
Recital O
O. whereas different state actors – Russia, China and North Korea, among others – have been involved in malicious cyber activities in pursuit of political, economic or security objectives that include attacks on critical infrastructure, cyber-espionage, disinformation campaigns and limiting access to the internet (such as Wannacry, NonPetya); whereas such activities could constitute wrongful acts under international law and could lead to a joint EU response, such as using the EU cyber diplomacy toolbox;
Amendment 134 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3
Paragraph 3
3. Recognises that many Member States consider possession of their own cyber defence capabilities to be at the core of their national security strategy and to constitute an essential part of their national sovereignty; stresses, however, that – as with other military branches, and also owing to the borderless nature of cyberspace – the scale required for truly comprehensive and effective forces is beyond the reach of any single Member State; reiterates that development of cyber defence at EU level has to enhance the EU’s capability to protect itself and act autonomously, thereby strengthening its strategic autonomy;
Amendment 138 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 3 a (new)
Paragraph 3 a (new)
3a. Notes that the EU’s capability to develop cyber defence projects depends on control of technologies, equipment, services, data and data processing, and has to rely on a trusted industry stakeholder base;
Amendment 145 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4
Paragraph 4
4. Strongly emphasises, therefore, that, in the framework of the emerging European Defence Union, cyber defence capabilities of Member States should be closely integrated as far as possible from the start to ensure maximum efficiency; urges, therefore, the Member States to cooperate closelywhere possible in the development of their respective cyber commands;
Amendment 151 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recalls that efforts to improve the homogeneity of command systems aim to have available command assets that are interoperable with NATO countries and occasional partners, and to guarantee a smooth exchange of information so as to speed up the decision-making loop and keep control of information in a cyber- risk context;
Amendment 182 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 10
Paragraph 10
10. Strongly supports the Military Erasmus initiative aimed at developing a common strategic culture by enhancing the interoperability of the armed forces of the Member States through an increased exchange of young officers; stresses that there is a need for more experts in the cyber defence domain; calls on the military academies to pay more attention to, and create more possibilities in, the field of cyber defence education;
Amendment 220 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 15
Paragraph 15
15. Calls for the implementation in practice of measures already committed to; calls for identifying new initiatives to further cooperation between the EU and NATO, taking into account as well the possibilities of cooperating within the NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence and the NATO Communications and Information (NCI) Academy; welcomes the recent creation of the European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats;
Amendment 238 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 20
Paragraph 20
20. Notes that there is substantial scope for a more ambitious and concrete cyber defence cooperation programme that goes beyond the conceptual level of cooperation in the context of specific operations; urges both organisations to implement in practice and effectively all that already exists and to present more ambitious proposals for the next review of the implementation of the Joint Statement;
Amendment 246 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 21
Paragraph 21
21. Regrets that, after several months of negotiations, the UN Group of Governmental Experts failed to adopt a consensus report; recalls, however, that international law, and the United Nations Charter in particular, applies to cyberspace and, that the 2013 and 2015 UNGGE reports still provide relevant guidelines, in particular as regards the prohibition for states to conduct or knowingly support cyber activities contrary to their obligations under international rules;
Amendment 251 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 22
Paragraph 22
22. Notes the relevance of the Tallinn Manual 2.0 in this context as an excellent basis for a debate on how international law applies to cyberspace; notes that it is now time for the Member States to start analysing and applying what the experts have stated in the Tallinn Manual;
Amendment 296 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 28
Paragraph 28