BETA


Events

2018/06/13
   EP - Results of vote in Parliament
2018/06/13
   EP - Decision by Parliament
Details

The European Parliament adopted by 476 votes to 151 with 36 abstentions, a resolution on cyber defence.

The EU and the Member States face an unprecedented threat in the form of politically motivated, state-sponsored cyber-attacks as well as cyber-crime and terrorism. Given its current vulnerability mainly due to the fragmentation of European defence strategies, there is an urgent need to strengthen the EU’s capabilities in the field of cyber defence.

Capability development for cyber defence : Parliament underlined that a common cyber defence policy should constitute core elements in the development of the European Defence Union (EDU). It called for a coherent development of cyber capacities across all EU institutions and bodies, as well as in the Member States.

Members urged the Member States to cooperate closely in the development of their respective cyber defence , using a clear roadmap, with a view to better streamlining cyber defence structures across the Member States. A European secure network for critical information and infrastructure should be developed.

Member States were urged to make the best possible use of the framework provided by the Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) and the European Defence Fund to propose cooperation projects.

Members welcomed the two cyber projects to be launched in the framework of PESCO, namely the Cyber Threats and Incident Response Information Sharing Platform and the Cyber Rapid Response Teams and Mutual Assistance in Cyber Security. They hoped it would lead to the creation of a European cyber rapid response team , which would coordinate, detect and counter collective cyber threats.

Education and training : Parliament called on the EU and the Member States to strengthen their cooperation in education, training and exercises. It strongly support the Military Erasmus Programme and other common training and exchange initiatives among young military personnel. It s tressed the need to strengthen awareness and expertise in the field of cybersecurity. All Member States should inform, educate and advise businesses, schools and citizens about cybersecurity and the major digital threats.

EU-NATO cooperation on cyber defence : the Council was called on to consider ways of providing, at soon as possible, Union-level support for integrating the cyber domain into Member States military doctrines , in a harmonised manner and in close cooperation with NATO. Members were convinced of the importance of increased cooperation between the EU and NATO as a means of preventing, detecting and deterring cyber attacks.

International norms : Members called for mainstreaming cyber defence capabilities into the CFSP and the external action of the EU and its Member States and called for closer coordination on cyber defence between the Member States, the EU institutions, NATO, the United Nations, the United States and other strategic partners, in particular as regards rules, norms and enforcement measures in cyber space. Member States should further implement the common and comprehensive EU approach to cyber diplomacy and existing cyber norms, and to draw up, together with NATO, EU-level criteria for, and definitions of what constitutes, a cyber-attack so as to improve the EU's ability to quickly come to a common position following an internationally wrongful act in the form of a cyber-attack.

Civil-military cooperation : Parliament called on all stakeholders to reinforce knowledge transfer partnerships, implement appropriate business models in order to create synergies and port solutions between the civilian and military markets – in essence a European single market for cyber security and cyber-security products , with the view to preserving and strengthening the EU’s strategic autonomy.

Member States should further support the European cyber security industry and reduce the administrative burden, particular for SMEs and to promote closer cooperation with university research organisations with a view to reducing dependencies on cyber security products from external sources and to creating a strategic supply chain inside the EU to enhance its strategic autonomy.

The resolution also called for:

a roadmap for a coordinated approach to European cyber defence; international cooperation and multilateral initiatives to build stringent cyber defence and cyber security frameworks to counter state capture by corruption, financial fraud, money laundering, the financing of terrorism; tackle the challenges posed by cyber terrorism and by crypto currencies and other alternative payment methods.

At the institutional level , Parliament suggested that the Member States launch a new PESCO cyber cooperative programme with a view to supporting quick and effective planning, command and control of present and future EU operations and missions. This should lead to better coordination of operational capacities in cyber space, and may lead to the development of a common cyber defence command when the European Council so decides.

Documents
2018/06/13
   EP - End of procedure in Parliament
2018/06/12
   EP - Debate in Parliament
2018/05/25
   EP - Committee report tabled for plenary
Details

The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Urmas PAET (ALDE, EE) on cyber defence.

The EU and the Member States face an unprecedented threat in the form of politically motivated, state-sponsored cyber-attacks as well as cyber-crime and terrorism. Given its current vulnerability mainly due to the fragmentation of European defence strategies, there is an urgent need to strengthen the EU’s capabilities in the field of cyber defence.

Capability development for cyber defence : the report underlined that a common cyber defence policy should constitute core elements in the development of the European Defence Union (EDU). It called for a coherent development of cyber capacities across all EU institutions and bodies, as well as in the Member States, and for providing needed political and practical solutions to overcoming the remaining political, legislative and organisational obstacles to cooperation on cyber defence.

Members urged the Member States to cooperate closely in the development of their respective cyber defence, using a clear roadmap , thereby feeding into a process coordinated by the Commission, the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the European Defence Agency (EDA) with a view to better streamlining cyber defence structures across the Member States. A European secure network for critical information and infrastructure should be developed.

Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) and the European Defence Fund (EDF) : these are new initiatives with the necessary scope to foster an ecosystem that can provide opportunities for SMEs and start-up companies, and to facilitate cooperative projects in the cyber defence domain, and both will contribute to shape the regulatory and institutional framework. Member States are urged to make the best possible use of the framework provided by PESCO and the EDF to propose cooperation projects. They w elcomed two cyber projects to be launched, namely an information-sharing platform for cyber incidents and cyber rapid response teams. They hope it will lead to the creation of a European cyber rapid response team, which would coordinate, detect and counter collective cyber threats.

Education and training : the report noted that a streamlined EU cyber defence education and training landscape would significantly mitigate threats. Members strongly support the Military Erasmus Programme and other common training and exchange initiatives aimed at enhancing the interoperability of the armed forces of the Member States and the development of a common strategic culture through an increased exchange of young military personnel. Further awareness raising and expertise in the area of cyber security is needed.

EU-NATO cooperation on cyber defence : the Council is called on to consider ways of providing, at soon as possible, Union-level support for integrating the cyber domain into Member States military doctrines, in a harmonised manner and in close cooperation with NATO. Members are convinced that increased cooperation between EU and NATO is important and useful in the area of cyber defence as a means to prevent, detect and deter cyber-attacks.

International norms : Members called for mainstreaming cyber defence capabilities into the CFSP and the external action of the EU and its Member States and called for closer coordination on cyber defence between the Member States, the EU institutions, NATO, the United Nations, the United States and other strategic partners, in particular as regards rules, norms and enforcement measures in cyber space. Member States should further implement the common and comprehensive EU approach to cyber diplomacy and existing cyber norms, and to draw up, together with NATO, EU-level criteria for, and definitions of what constitutes, a cyber-attack so as to improve the EU's ability to quickly come to a common position following an internationally wrongful act in the form of a cyber-attack.

Civil-military cooperation : noting the pivotal role that private cyber-security firms play in early warning and attribution of cyber-attacks, Members called on all stakeholders to reinforce knowledge transfer partnerships, implement appropriate business models and develop trust between companies and defence and civilian end-users. More practical support should be given to the European cyber security industry and other relevant economic actors, to reduce bureaucratic burdens, in particular for SMEs and to promote closer cooperation with university research organisations with a view to reducing dependencies on cyber security products from external sources and to creating a strategic supply chain inside the EU to enhance its strategic autonomy.

In this regard, Members encouraged the Commission to integrate cyber defence elements into a network of European cybersecurity competence and research centres, also in view of providing sufficient resources to dual use cyber capabilities and technologies within the next MFF.

The report also called for:

a roadmap for a coordinated approach to European cyber defence; international cooperation and multilateral initiatives to build stringent cyber defence and cyber security frameworks to counter state capture by corruption, financial fraud, money laundering, the financing of terrorism; tackle the challenges posed by cyber terrorism and by cryptocurrencies and other alternative payment methods.

Institutional reinforcement : Members called for:

the Member States to engage in more ambitious cooperation in the cyber domain within PESCO; the Member States and the VP/HR to present an EU white book on security and defence ; the creation of an EU Council on Defence; the European Defence Fund to be maintained or even boosted in the next MFF, with a sufficient budget earmarked for cyber defence; increased resources to modernise and streamline cyber security and intelligence dissemination between the EEAS/European Union Intelligence and Situation Centre (INTCEN), the Council and the Commission.

Documents
2018/05/16
   EP - Vote in committee
2018/04/11
   EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2018/02/27
   EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2018/01/18
   EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament
2018/01/16
   EP - PAET Urmas (ALDE) appointed as rapporteur in AFET

Documents

Activities

Votes

A8-0189/2018 - Urmas Paet - Résolution 13/06/2018 13:13:23.000 #

2018/06/13 Outcome: +: 476, -: 151, 0: 36
IT PL DE RO ES BE GB BG CZ SK HU FR PT AT LT HR FI NL SI MT LU LV EE IE CY ?? SE DK EL
Total
61
46
82
26
48
20
66
16
18
13
16
65
19
15
11
11
11
24
8
5
6
7
5
10
6
1
20
9
17
icon: PPE PPE
201

United Kingdom PPE

2

Luxembourg PPE

3

Estonia PPE

For (1)

1

Cyprus PPE

1
icon: S&D S&D
159
3

Croatia S&D

2

Finland S&D

1

Netherlands S&D

For (1)

1

Slovenia S&D

For (1)

1

Malta S&D

2

Luxembourg S&D

For (1)

1

Latvia S&D

Against (1)

1

Estonia S&D

For (1)

1

Ireland S&D

For (1)

1

Cyprus S&D

2

Denmark S&D

2
icon: ALDE ALDE
60
3

Romania ALDE

3

United Kingdom ALDE

1

Portugal ALDE

1

Austria ALDE

For (1)

1

Croatia ALDE

2

Slovenia ALDE

Abstain (1)

1

Luxembourg ALDE

For (1)

1

Latvia ALDE

1

Estonia ALDE

For (1)

Abstain (1)

2

Ireland ALDE

For (1)

1

Denmark ALDE

For (1)

1
icon: ECR ECR
65

Italy ECR

2

Romania ECR

For (1)

1

Bulgaria ECR

2

Czechia ECR

2

Slovakia ECR

Abstain (1)

3

Lithuania ECR

1

Croatia ECR

For (1)

1
2

Netherlands ECR

2

Latvia ECR

Abstain (1)

1

Cyprus ECR

1

Greece ECR

Against (1)

1
icon: NI NI
17

Germany NI

Against (1)

2

United Kingdom NI

For (1)

4

Hungary NI

For (1)

1

France NI

Against (1)

1

NI

For (1)

1

Denmark NI

1
icon: EFDD EFDD
39

Poland EFDD

1

Germany EFDD

Against (1)

1

Czechia EFDD

Against (1)

1

France EFDD

Against (1)

Abstain (1)

4

Lithuania EFDD

Abstain (1)

1

Sweden EFDD

2
icon: ENF ENF
31

Poland ENF

Against (1)

1

Germany ENF

Against (1)

1

Belgium ENF

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom ENF

Against (1)

1

Netherlands ENF

4
icon: Verts/ALE Verts/ALE
45

Italy Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Belgium Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

United Kingdom Verts/ALE

5

Hungary Verts/ALE

2

France Verts/ALE

4

Austria Verts/ALE

2

Lithuania Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Croatia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Finland Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Netherlands Verts/ALE

2

Slovenia Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Luxembourg Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1

Estonia Verts/ALE

Abstain (1)

1

Denmark Verts/ALE

Against (1)

1
icon: GUE/NGL GUE/NGL
45

Italy GUE/NGL

3

United Kingdom GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Czechia GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Finland GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Netherlands GUE/NGL

3
4

Cyprus GUE/NGL

2

Sweden GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1

Denmark GUE/NGL

Against (1)

1
AmendmentsDossier
338 2018/2004(INI)
2018/04/11 AFET 338 amendments...
source: 620.817

History

(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)

committees/0/shadows/3
name
COUSO PERMUY Javier
group
European United Left - Nordic Green Left
abbr
GUE/NGL
docs/0/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.310
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-PR-618310_EN.html
docs/1/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE620.817
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AFET-AM-620817_EN.html
events/0/type
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee referral announced in Parliament
events/1/type
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
New
Vote in committee
events/2
date
2018-05-25T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0189_EN.html title: A8-0189/2018
summary
events/2
date
2018-05-25T00:00:00
type
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0189_EN.html title: A8-0189/2018
summary
events/3/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180612&type=CRE
New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-8-2018-06-12-TOC_EN.html
events/5
date
2018-06-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament
body
EP
docs
url: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0258_EN.html title: T8-0258/2018
summary
events/5
date
2018-06-13T00:00:00
type
Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
body
EP
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0258_EN.html title: T8-0258/2018
summary
events/2/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0189&language=EN
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2018-0189_EN.html
events/5/docs/0/url
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0258
New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0258_EN.html
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
rapporteur
name: PAET Urmas date: 2018-01-16T00:00:00 group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-01-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PAET Urmas group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-01-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PAET Urmas group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-01-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PAET Urmas group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
activities
  • date: 2018-01-18T00:00:00 body: EP type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio group: S&D name: MOODY Clare group: ECR name: FOTYGA Anna Elżbieta group: GUE/NGL name: COUSO PERMUY Javier group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo group: ENF name: SCHAFFHAUSER Jean-Luc responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-01-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: PAET Urmas
  • date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 body: EP type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading committees: body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio group: S&D name: MOODY Clare group: ECR name: FOTYGA Anna Elżbieta group: GUE/NGL name: COUSO PERMUY Javier group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo group: ENF name: SCHAFFHAUSER Jean-Luc responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-01-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: PAET Urmas
  • date: 2018-05-25T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0189&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0189/2018 body: EP type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
  • date: 2018-06-12T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180612&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament body: EP type: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-06-13T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31158&l=en type: Results of vote in Parliament title: Results of vote in Parliament url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0258 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading title: T8-0258/2018 body: EP type: Results of vote in Parliament
commission
  • body: EC dg: Secretariat-General commissioner: TIMMERMANS Frans
committees/0
type
Responsible Committee
body
EP
associated
False
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
committee
AFET
date
2018-01-16T00:00:00
rapporteur
name: PAET Urmas group: Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe abbr: ALDE
shadows
committees/0
body
EP
shadows
responsible
True
committee
AFET
date
2018-01-16T00:00:00
committee_full
Foreign Affairs
rapporteur
group: ALDE name: PAET Urmas
docs
  • date: 2018-02-27T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE618.310 title: PE618.310 type: Committee draft report body: EP
  • date: 2018-04-11T00:00:00 docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE620.817 title: PE620.817 type: Amendments tabled in committee body: EP
events
  • date: 2018-01-18T00:00:00 type: Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-05-16T00:00:00 type: Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading body: EP
  • date: 2018-05-25T00:00:00 type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0189&language=EN title: A8-0189/2018 summary: The Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted the own-initiative report by Urmas PAET (ALDE, EE) on cyber defence. The EU and the Member States face an unprecedented threat in the form of politically motivated, state-sponsored cyber-attacks as well as cyber-crime and terrorism. Given its current vulnerability mainly due to the fragmentation of European defence strategies, there is an urgent need to strengthen the EU’s capabilities in the field of cyber defence. Capability development for cyber defence : the report underlined that a common cyber defence policy should constitute core elements in the development of the European Defence Union (EDU). It called for a coherent development of cyber capacities across all EU institutions and bodies, as well as in the Member States, and for providing needed political and practical solutions to overcoming the remaining political, legislative and organisational obstacles to cooperation on cyber defence. Members urged the Member States to cooperate closely in the development of their respective cyber defence, using a clear roadmap , thereby feeding into a process coordinated by the Commission, the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the European Defence Agency (EDA) with a view to better streamlining cyber defence structures across the Member States. A European secure network for critical information and infrastructure should be developed. Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) and the European Defence Fund (EDF) : these are new initiatives with the necessary scope to foster an ecosystem that can provide opportunities for SMEs and start-up companies, and to facilitate cooperative projects in the cyber defence domain, and both will contribute to shape the regulatory and institutional framework. Member States are urged to make the best possible use of the framework provided by PESCO and the EDF to propose cooperation projects. They w elcomed two cyber projects to be launched, namely an information-sharing platform for cyber incidents and cyber rapid response teams. They hope it will lead to the creation of a European cyber rapid response team, which would coordinate, detect and counter collective cyber threats. Education and training : the report noted that a streamlined EU cyber defence education and training landscape would significantly mitigate threats. Members strongly support the Military Erasmus Programme and other common training and exchange initiatives aimed at enhancing the interoperability of the armed forces of the Member States and the development of a common strategic culture through an increased exchange of young military personnel. Further awareness raising and expertise in the area of cyber security is needed. EU-NATO cooperation on cyber defence : the Council is called on to consider ways of providing, at soon as possible, Union-level support for integrating the cyber domain into Member States military doctrines, in a harmonised manner and in close cooperation with NATO. Members are convinced that increased cooperation between EU and NATO is important and useful in the area of cyber defence as a means to prevent, detect and deter cyber-attacks. International norms : Members called for mainstreaming cyber defence capabilities into the CFSP and the external action of the EU and its Member States and called for closer coordination on cyber defence between the Member States, the EU institutions, NATO, the United Nations, the United States and other strategic partners, in particular as regards rules, norms and enforcement measures in cyber space. Member States should further implement the common and comprehensive EU approach to cyber diplomacy and existing cyber norms, and to draw up, together with NATO, EU-level criteria for, and definitions of what constitutes, a cyber-attack so as to improve the EU's ability to quickly come to a common position following an internationally wrongful act in the form of a cyber-attack. Civil-military cooperation : noting the pivotal role that private cyber-security firms play in early warning and attribution of cyber-attacks, Members called on all stakeholders to reinforce knowledge transfer partnerships, implement appropriate business models and develop trust between companies and defence and civilian end-users. More practical support should be given to the European cyber security industry and other relevant economic actors, to reduce bureaucratic burdens, in particular for SMEs and to promote closer cooperation with university research organisations with a view to reducing dependencies on cyber security products from external sources and to creating a strategic supply chain inside the EU to enhance its strategic autonomy. In this regard, Members encouraged the Commission to integrate cyber defence elements into a network of European cybersecurity competence and research centres, also in view of providing sufficient resources to dual use cyber capabilities and technologies within the next MFF. The report also called for: a roadmap for a coordinated approach to European cyber defence; international cooperation and multilateral initiatives to build stringent cyber defence and cyber security frameworks to counter state capture by corruption, financial fraud, money laundering, the financing of terrorism; tackle the challenges posed by cyber terrorism and by cryptocurrencies and other alternative payment methods. Institutional reinforcement : Members called for: the Member States to engage in more ambitious cooperation in the cyber domain within PESCO; the Member States and the VP/HR to present an EU white book on security and defence ; the creation of an EU Council on Defence; the European Defence Fund to be maintained or even boosted in the next MFF, with a sufficient budget earmarked for cyber defence; increased resources to modernise and streamline cyber security and intelligence dissemination between the EEAS/European Union Intelligence and Situation Centre (INTCEN), the Council and the Commission.
  • date: 2018-06-12T00:00:00 type: Debate in Parliament body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180612&type=CRE title: Debate in Parliament
  • date: 2018-06-13T00:00:00 type: Results of vote in Parliament body: EP docs: url: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/sda.do?id=31158&l=en title: Results of vote in Parliament
  • date: 2018-06-13T00:00:00 type: Decision by Parliament, 1st reading/single reading body: EP docs: url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P8-TA-2018-0258 title: T8-0258/2018 summary: The European Parliament adopted by 476 votes to 151 with 36 abstentions, a resolution on cyber defence. The EU and the Member States face an unprecedented threat in the form of politically motivated, state-sponsored cyber-attacks as well as cyber-crime and terrorism. Given its current vulnerability mainly due to the fragmentation of European defence strategies, there is an urgent need to strengthen the EU’s capabilities in the field of cyber defence. Capability development for cyber defence : Parliament underlined that a common cyber defence policy should constitute core elements in the development of the European Defence Union (EDU). It called for a coherent development of cyber capacities across all EU institutions and bodies, as well as in the Member States. Members urged the Member States to cooperate closely in the development of their respective cyber defence , using a clear roadmap, with a view to better streamlining cyber defence structures across the Member States. A European secure network for critical information and infrastructure should be developed. Member States were urged to make the best possible use of the framework provided by the Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) and the European Defence Fund to propose cooperation projects. Members welcomed the two cyber projects to be launched in the framework of PESCO, namely the Cyber Threats and Incident Response Information Sharing Platform and the Cyber Rapid Response Teams and Mutual Assistance in Cyber Security. They hoped it would lead to the creation of a European cyber rapid response team , which would coordinate, detect and counter collective cyber threats. Education and training : Parliament called on the EU and the Member States to strengthen their cooperation in education, training and exercises. It strongly support the Military Erasmus Programme and other common training and exchange initiatives among young military personnel. It s tressed the need to strengthen awareness and expertise in the field of cybersecurity. All Member States should inform, educate and advise businesses, schools and citizens about cybersecurity and the major digital threats. EU-NATO cooperation on cyber defence : the Council was called on to consider ways of providing, at soon as possible, Union-level support for integrating the cyber domain into Member States military doctrines , in a harmonised manner and in close cooperation with NATO. Members were convinced of the importance of increased cooperation between the EU and NATO as a means of preventing, detecting and deterring cyber attacks. International norms : Members called for mainstreaming cyber defence capabilities into the CFSP and the external action of the EU and its Member States and called for closer coordination on cyber defence between the Member States, the EU institutions, NATO, the United Nations, the United States and other strategic partners, in particular as regards rules, norms and enforcement measures in cyber space. Member States should further implement the common and comprehensive EU approach to cyber diplomacy and existing cyber norms, and to draw up, together with NATO, EU-level criteria for, and definitions of what constitutes, a cyber-attack so as to improve the EU's ability to quickly come to a common position following an internationally wrongful act in the form of a cyber-attack. Civil-military cooperation : Parliament called on all stakeholders to reinforce knowledge transfer partnerships, implement appropriate business models in order to create synergies and port solutions between the civilian and military markets – in essence a European single market for cyber security and cyber-security products , with the view to preserving and strengthening the EU’s strategic autonomy. Member States should further support the European cyber security industry and reduce the administrative burden, particular for SMEs and to promote closer cooperation with university research organisations with a view to reducing dependencies on cyber security products from external sources and to creating a strategic supply chain inside the EU to enhance its strategic autonomy. The resolution also called for: a roadmap for a coordinated approach to European cyber defence; international cooperation and multilateral initiatives to build stringent cyber defence and cyber security frameworks to counter state capture by corruption, financial fraud, money laundering, the financing of terrorism; tackle the challenges posed by cyber terrorism and by crypto currencies and other alternative payment methods. At the institutional level , Parliament suggested that the Member States launch a new PESCO cyber cooperative programme with a view to supporting quick and effective planning, command and control of present and future EU operations and missions. This should lead to better coordination of operational capacities in cyber space, and may lead to the development of a common cyber defence command when the European Council so decides.
  • date: 2018-06-13T00:00:00 type: End of procedure in Parliament body: EP
links
other
  • body: EC dg: url: http://ec.europa.eu/info/departments/secretariat-general_en title: Secretariat-General commissioner: TIMMERMANS Frans
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
Old
AFET/8/11990
New
  • AFET/8/11990
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 54
procedure/legal_basis/0
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/subject
Old
  • 3.30.07 Cybersecurity, cyberspace policy
  • 6.10.02 Common security and defence policy (CSDP); WEU, NATO
New
3.30.07
Cybersecurity, cyberspace policy
6.10.02
Common security and defence policy (CSDP); WEU, NATO
activities/0
date
2018-01-18T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio group: S&D name: MOODY Clare group: ECR name: FOTYGA Anna Elżbieta group: GUE/NGL name: COUSO PERMUY Javier group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo group: ENF name: SCHAFFHAUSER Jean-Luc responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-01-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: PAET Urmas
activities/1
date
2018-05-16T00:00:00
body
EP
type
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single reading
committees
body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio group: S&D name: MOODY Clare group: ECR name: FOTYGA Anna Elżbieta group: GUE/NGL name: COUSO PERMUY Javier group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo group: ENF name: SCHAFFHAUSER Jean-Luc responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-01-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: PAET Urmas
activities/2/date
Old
2018-06-11T00:00:00
New
2018-05-25T00:00:00
activities/2/docs
  • url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A8-2018-0189&language=EN type: Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading title: A8-0189/2018
activities/2/type
Old
Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
New
Committee report tabled for plenary, single reading
activities/3
date
2018-06-12T00:00:00
docs
url: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?secondRef=TOC&language=EN&reference=20180612&type=CRE type: Debate in Parliament title: Debate in Parliament
body
EP
type
Debate in Parliament
activities/4
date
2018-06-13T00:00:00
docs
body
EP
type
Results of vote in Parliament
committees/0/shadows/1
group
S&D
name
MOODY Clare
other/0
body
EC
dg
commissioner
TIMMERMANS Frans
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee
AFET/8/11990
procedure/legal_basis/0
Old
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
New
Rules of Procedure EP 52
procedure/stage_reached
Old
Preparatory phase in Parliament
New
Procedure completed
activities
  • date: 2018-06-11T00:00:00 body: EP type: Indicative plenary sitting date, 1st reading/single reading
committees
  • body: EP shadows: group: EPP name: LÓPEZ-ISTÚRIZ WHITE Antonio group: ECR name: FOTYGA Anna Elżbieta group: GUE/NGL name: COUSO PERMUY Javier group: Verts/ALE name: TARAND Indrek group: EFD name: CASTALDO Fabio Massimo group: ENF name: SCHAFFHAUSER Jean-Luc responsible: True committee: AFET date: 2018-01-16T00:00:00 committee_full: Foreign Affairs rapporteur: group: ALDE name: PAET Urmas
links
other
    procedure
    reference
    2018/2004(INI)
    title
    Cyber defence
    legal_basis
    Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 052
    stage_reached
    Preparatory phase in Parliament
    subtype
    Initiative
    type
    INI - Own-initiative procedure
    subject