BETA

8 Amendments of Arnaud DANJEAN related to 2020/2080(INI)

Amendment 33 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital F
F. whereas PESCO’s long-term vision is to achieve a coherent full-spectrum force package available to the Member States; whereas PESCO should enhance the EU’s capacity to act as an international security provider in order to protect EU citizens and maximise the effectiveness of defence spending; whereas the cost of non-Europe in security and defence is estimated to be more than EUR 100 billion per year;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 94 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital L
L. whereas work on the first three L. waves of PESCO projects has led to the pMS proposing 47 projects; whereas to date, none has come to fruition; whereas the projects in the first wave are mainly capability-building projects involving as many Member States as possible; whereas the inclusive nature of PESCO projects should not lead the pMS to water down their ambitions; whereas it is essential that PESCO focus on projects that deliver genuine added value; whereas the current list of projects lacks coherence, scope, strategic ambition so that the most obvious capability gaps will not be filled, and does not adequately address priority shortfalls as identified by the pMS; whereas one of these projects has been stopped in order to avoid unnecessary duplication; whereas other projects did not make sufficient progress or are at risk of being stopped, and around 30 projects are still in the ideation and preparatory phase;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 157 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital U
U. whereas currently, PESCO projects are dependent on the 25 participating Member States’ financial contributions; whereas it is expected that, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, national defence budgets will suffer reductions; whereas paradoxically, several of the currently 47 PESCO projects, if funded accordingly, could strengthen Member States’ preparedness, should another massive public health crisis occur: military mobility – a flagship PESCO project –, the European Medical Command and many other projects in areas related to logistics and transportation, health care, disaster relief and the fight against malicious cyber activities; whereas cutting funding for the strategic capabilities that the EU and its Member States currently lack would also weaken their ability to jointly act against future pandemics;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 172 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital W
W. whereas the participation of third countries in individual PESCO projects, subject to very strict conditions and on the basis of established and effective reciprocity, might be in the strategic interest of the European Union, particularly in the case of the United Kingdom;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 185 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital Z
Z. whereas deepening defence cooperation among Member States at EU level should go hand in hand with the strengthening of Parliament’s power of scrutinyan increase in the information made available to Parliament;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 256 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j
(j) focus PESCO efforts on projects with a more operational focus, in direct response to the needs of European armed forces engaged in operations, and with a strategic and integrative dimension, such as EUFOR CROC, and link those to other PESCO projects in order to create additional synergies and effects of scale;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 263 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point j a (new)
(ja) focus PESCO on constructive projects with a genuine European strategic dimension in order to strengthen the industrial and technological base of European defence;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET
Amendment 325 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 1 – point u
(u) clarify or define the link between the governance of PESCO and that of the EDF and to involve Parliament in the ex- post control process when it comes to EDF funding of PESCO projects;
2020/07/08
Committee: AFET