BETA

17 Amendments of Dennis de JONG related to 2016/2908(RSP)

Amendment 1 #

Citation 5 a (new)
- having regard to Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe,
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 24 #

Paragraph 9
9. Urges the Commission to review in 2017 the conformity factor for RDE tests of NOx emissions, as provided for by the 2nd RDE package, and to phase-out the conformity factor, allowing only for the measuring accuracy;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 29 #

Paragraph 9 a (new)
9a. Asks the Commission to set more strict limits for NOx emissions since air pollution is the largest environmental health hazard in Europe, resulting in a lower quality of life due to illnesses and an estimate of thousands premature deaths per year;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 40 #

Paragraph 13 b (new)
13b. Calls upon Member States to introduce or strengthen the regulation of lobby activities of, in particular, the car manufacturing industries and thus to ensure that public health and other public interests are well represented in their national decision-making procedures;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 74 #

Paragraph 20 a (new)
20a. Urges the Commission in this respect to examine how competition among type approval authorities and among testing services can be eliminated, for example, by restricting the choice of car manufacturers to authorities and testing services to those in the Member State in which the car manufacturers' main offices are located.
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 75 #

Paragraph 21
21. Believes that the new framework for EU type-approval should empower the Commission to verify type approvals by asking Member States to retesting vehicles and to initiate corrective measures where necessarynever Member States do not follow up any such requests;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 89 #

Paragraph 23
23. Draws attention to the US type- approval system – whereby fees collected from manufacturers to cover the cost of certification and compliance programmes are sent to the US Treasury, and the US Congress in turn allocates funds to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to implement its programmes – as a paradigm that may be useful for improving the independence of the EU system of Member States;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 119 #

Paragraph 28
28. Calls for stricter and more effective enforcement of vehicle emission measurement rules in the EU; considers that only stronger oversight at EU level can ensure that the EU law on emissions is properly enforced; proposes that the governance structure on car emissions be reformed without delay and brought into line with the other transport sectors;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 126 #

Paragraph 31
31. Suggests that the Commission should be empowered to impose effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative fines where non- compliance of vehicles is establishdeleted;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 144 #

Paragraph 36 a (new)
36a. Asks the Commission and Member States to take all necessary measures to ensure that consumers will be adequately compensated, including through mechanisms of collective redress;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 163 #

Paragraph 38
38. Considers that the powers of Parliament’s committees of inquiry should be better aligned with those of the national parliaments, in particular as regards the summoningto ensure the effective summoning and participation of individuals and the application of sanctions in the event of refusal to cooperate; calls on the Commission and the Member States to support the related provisions in Parliament’s current proposal;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 165 #

Paragraph 38 a (new)
38a. Considers that the operating period of any inquiry committee should be synchronised with the legislative processes relating to the subject under investigation;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 171 #

Paragraph 45
45. Notes that Rule 198 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure should define more clearly when the 12-month duration of a committee of inquiry should start; suggests to have enough flexibility to ensure that there is enough time for the investigations; calls for the inquiry committee work to start only after the requested documents are received from the EU institutions;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 172 #

Paragraph 46
46. Considers that an interim report should not be included in future mandates in order not to pre-empt the final conclusions of the inquiry;deleted
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 174 #

Paragraph 47
47. Considers that committees of inquiry should be kept as small as possible in future in order to ensure greater efficiency and effectiveness in organising and conducting the committees’ work, in particular during the public hearings;deleted
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 177 #

Paragraph 48 a (new)
48a. Notes that inquiry committees are temporary committees overlapping with the members' standing committee work and therefore requests flexibility of using members outside of the inquiry committee to cover the absence of any member or substitute member;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS
Amendment 179 #

Paragraph 48 b (new)
48b. Considers that the inquiry committee mandate should be able to be altered according to the findings during the investigation in order to have full picture of the issues under investigation;
2017/01/24
Committee: EMIS