BETA

8 Amendments of Joachim ZELLER related to 2011/0302(COD)

Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 47 a (new)
(47a) In order to guarantee broad and fair competition for projects funded under the CEF, the form of the contract must be consistent with the aims and circumstances of the project. The terms of the contract must be drafted in such a way as to spread the risks associated with the work to be carried out fairly, in order to maximise cost-effectiveness and ensure that the work is performed as efficiently as possible. This principle shall apply irrespective of whether a national or international contract model is employed.
2012/10/10
Committee: TRANITRE
Amendment 523 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 a (new)
Article 13a In order to guarantee broad and fair competition for projects funded under the CEF, the form of the contract must be consistent with the aims and circumstances of the project. The terms of the contract must be drafted in such a way as to spread the risks associated with the work to be carried out fairly, in order to maximise cost-effectiveness and ensure that the work is performed as efficiently as possible. This principle shall apply irrespective of whether a national or international contract model is employed.
2012/10/10
Committee: TRANITRE
Amendment 572 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 23 – paragraph 1 a (new)
1a. If a large-scale project fails to comply with the general principles laid down in Article 13a, it may not be supported using CEF funds. The Commission shall give the Member State concerned the opportunity to bring the project into line with the general principles in question.
2012/10/10
Committee: TRANITRE
Amendment 651 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Part 1 – point 5 – introductory part
Helsinki – Turku – Stockholm – Malmö – København – Fehmarn – Hamburg – Hannover Bremen – HannoverGedser Rostock – Berlin – Nürnberg – München – Brenner – Verona – Bologna – Roma – Napoli – Bari Napoli – Palermo – Valletta
2012/10/17
Committee: TRANITRE
Amendment 652 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Part 1 – point 5 – introductory part
Helsinki – Turku – Stockholm – Malmö – København – Fehmarn – Hamburg – Hannover Bremen – Hannover – Nürnberg – Øresund/Copenhagen – Rostock - Berlin - Nürnberg -München – Brenner – Verona – Bologna – Roma – Napoli – Bari Napoli – Palermo – Valletta
2012/10/17
Committee: TRANITRE
Amendment 654 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Part I – point 5 – rows 7-9
Fehmarn Nykøbing - Gedser Rail studies ongoing, and upgrading Gedser - Rostock Ports, MoS construinterconnection ws Porkts Fehmarn Belt fixed link between 2014 and 2020 København - Hamburg Rail access routes DK to be via Fehmarn: access completed by 2020, routes access routes Germany to be completed in 2 steps (2020 - 2027) Hamburg/Bremewith rail; low-emission ferries; ice-breaking capacity Rostock - Berlin - Rail works to be started before Hannover 2020studies; upgrading Nürnberg
2012/10/17
Committee: TRANITRE
Amendment 662 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Part 1 – point 7 – introductory part
Gran Canaria / Tenerife – Sines / Lisboa – Madrid – Valladolid Lisboa – Aveiro – Oporto Aveiro – Valladolid – Vitoria – Bordeaux – Paris – Mannheim/Strasbourg
2012/10/17
Committee: TRANITRE
Amendment 664 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Part I – point 7 – row 1 a (new)
Gran Canaria/Tenerife – Ports, Airports, MoS port and airport studies Sines / Lisboa – Madrid and works, links between the Canaries and Sines / Lisboa
2012/10/17
Committee: TRANITRE