Progress: Procedure completed
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Joint Responsible Committee | ['ITRE', 'TRAN'] | RIQUET Dominique ( PPE), AYALA SENDER Inés ( S&D), VĂLEAN Adina-Ioana ( ALDE) | CANCIAN Antonio ( PPE), PIRILLO Mario ( S&D), DE BACKER Philippe ( ALDE), CRAMER Michael ( Verts/ALE), TURMES Claude ( Verts/ALE), SZYMAŃSKI Konrad ( ECR), ZĪLE Roberts ( ECR) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | FÄRM Göran ( S&D) | |
Committee Opinion | REGI | PIEPER Markus ( PPE) | Victor BOŞTINARU ( S&D), Ramona Nicole MĂNESCU ( PPE) |
Committee Legal Basis Opinion | JURI | SPERONI Francesco Enrico ( EFD) |
Lead committee dossier:
Legal Basis:
RoP 58, TFEU 172
Legal Basis:
RoP 58, TFEU 172Subjects
Events
In accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1316/2013, the Commission presented a report on the mid-term evaluation of the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF).
The CEF is a joint programme established under the Europe 2020 strategy to finance infrastructure projects in the transport, telecommunications and energy sectors .
Based on the respective sectoral guidelines, the general objective of the CEF is to promote the implementation of projects contributing to the completion of trans-European networks (TENs) with the aim of strengthening the cohesion of the internal market and the competitiveness of the Union on the world market.
The Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) is a common, centrally-managed funding programme for transport, energy and telecommunications infrastructures, with an available budget of EUR 30.4 billion for the years 2014 to 2020 .
The evaluation was carried out according to five criteria : effectiveness, efficiency, relevance, coherence and EU added value. It stated that C EF is an effective and targeted instrument for investment in trans-European infrastructure (TEN) in transport, energy and the digital sector.
Three and a half years after its implementation, the CEF is on track, although it is still too early to measure the results.
The evaluation highlighted the following points:
Contribution to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth : since 2014, it has invested EUR 25 billion, which has resulted in approximately EUR 50 billion of overall infrastructure investment in the EU. CEF brings high European added value for all Member States by supporting connectivity projects with a cross-border dimension:
in transport , most of the CEF transport envelope was awarded for the completion of missing links and removal of bottlenecks on projects along the TEN-T Core Network (either through the creation of new infrastructure or the substantial upgrading and rehabilitating of existing infrastructure); in energy , CEF grants effectively contribute to enhancing security of supply, ending energy isolation, eliminating energy bottlenecks, completing the internal energy market and to enhancing the integration of renewable energy into the grid. Electricity projects contribute to reducing CO2 emissions by increasing grid capacity to integrate power produced from renewable sources; in telecommunications , there is evidence that CEF support for the deployment of DSIs is enabling public administrations, citizens and businesses to benefit from more comprehensive and efficient cross-border online services, thereby contributing to enhance the competitiveness of private and public actors alike. CEF also helps remove the bottlenecks which hinder the completion of the Digital Single Market, although the limited budget has so far only allowed to partially address the sector's needs.
In the three sectors it covers , the CEF is also instrumental in:
the deployment of EU-wide new systems in traffic management and safety (e.g. SESAR for aviation, ERTMS for railways); high-performance electricity lines and smart grids essential for the rapid intake of renewable non-carbon energy sources; in the roll-out of broadband and interconnected Digital Services (such as Open Data, e-Health, eProcurement, eIdentification and eSignature).
CEF spending in transport and energy is a major contributor to the EU’s target of at least 20 % of the total EU budget to be dedicated to climate action-related spending.
Efficient use of grants : the evaluation showed that the direct management of CEF grants has proved very efficient, with a strong project pipeline and a competitive selection process, a focus on EU policy objectives, coordinated implementation and the full involvement of Member States. The Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) has a very good track record on the financial management of the CEF and on optimising the budget, particularly thanks to its flexibility in quickly re-directing money unspent by certain actions to financing new ones.
CEF has continued to use and develop innovative financial instruments . However, their deployment has been limited due to the new possibilities offered by EFSI. The use of the CEF financial instruments is expected to take up during the second half of the programme when complementarity between the CEF specific financial instruments and EFSI will have been ensured.
Moreover, a very positive first experience of blending grants with financial instruments was carried out in 2017 in transport, with EUR 2.2 billion funding requested for a call with an indicative budget of EUR 1 billion, enabling the use of grants to maximise the leverage of private or public funds.
CEF has also tested cross-sectoral synergies , but has been limited by constraints in the current legal/budgetary framework. The sectoral policy guidelines and the CEF instrument would need to be made more flexible to facilitate synergies and be more responsive to new technological developments and priorities such as digitalisation , decarbonisation and cybersecurity .
The report concluded that the completion of the TEN will still require massive investments, part of which will depend on continued EU support. The size of CEF currently makes it possible to address only some of the identified market failures (e.g. bridging the funding gap with EU support) in all three sectors. Therefore, potential exists for unlocking further public and private investment if additional EU budget was made available to address more market failures.
PURPOSE: to establish the Connecting Europe Facility ("CEF") for the coordination, development and financing of the trans-European networks.
LEGISLATIVE ACT: Regulation (EU) n° 1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility, amending Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 680/2007 and (EC) No 67/2010.
CONTENT: this Regulation establishes the Connecting Europe Facility ("CEF"), which determines the conditions, methods and procedures for providing Union financial assistance to trans-European networks. The aim is to support projects of common interest in the sectors of transport, telecommunications and energy infrastructures and to exploit potential synergies between those sectors.
The aim of the creation of the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) is to accelerate investment in the field of trans-European networks and to leverage funding from both the public and the private sectors, while increasing legal certainty and respecting the principle of technological neutrality.
Support for projects of common interest:
1) Transport sector: the CEF shall support projects of common interest, as identified in Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 , that pursue the following objectives:
· removing bottlenecks, enhancing rail interoperability, bridging missing links and, in particular, improving cross-border sections;
· ensuring sustainable and efficient transport systems in the long run, with a view to preparing for expected future transport flows, as well as enabling all modes of transport to be decarbonised through transition to innovative low-carbon and energy-efficient transport technologies, while optimising safety;
· optimising the integration and interconnection of transport modes and enhancing the interoperability of transport services, while ensuring the accessibility of transport infrastructures.
Horizontal priorities concern particularly innovative management and services in the following sectors: (i) Single European Sky – SESAR system; (ii) telematic applications systems for road, rail, inland waterways and vessels (ITS, ERTMS, RIS and VTMIS); (iii) motorways of the sea.
2) Energy sector: support will be given for projects of common interest pursuing the following objectives:
· increasing competitiveness by promoting the further integration of the internal energy market and the interoperability of electricity and gas networks across borders;
· enhancing Union security of energy supply;
· contributing to sustainable development and protection of the environment, inter alia by the integration of energy from renewable sources into the transmission network, and by the development of smart energy networks and carbon dioxide networks.
The first two annual work programmes should give priority consideration to projects of common interest aimed at ending energy isolation and eliminating energy bottlenecks , so as to move towards completion of the internal energy market. The Regulation also stresses the particular importance of electricity projects , with first electricity highways by 2020.
3) Telecommunications sector: the CEF all actions implementing the projects of common interest and programme support actions identified in a Regulation on guidelines for trans-European networks in the area of telecommunications infrastructure.
Budget: the financial envelope for the CEF for the period 2014 to 2020 is EUR 33 242 259 000 in current prices. This amount is divided as follows:
· transport sector : EUR 26 250 582 000, of which EUR 11 305 500 000 shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent in line with this Regulation exclusively in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund;
· telecommunications sector : EUR 1 141 602 000;
· energy sector : EUR 5 850 075 000.
Following the mid-term evaluation, the European Parliament and the Council may, upon a proposal by the Commission, transfer appropriations between the transport, telecommunications and energy sectors, with the exception of the amount of EUR 11 305 500 000 transferred from the Cohesion Fund to finance transport sector projects in the Cohesion Fund-eligible Member States.
Financial instruments : in the energy sector , the budget envisaged should, as a priority, be allocated in the form of financial instruments, subject to market uptake.
Projects of common interest in the telecommunications sector should be eligible for Union financial support in the form of grants and procurement for core service platforms, generic services and horizontal actions.
Actions in the field of broadband deployment, including actions generating demand for broadband, should be eligible for Union financial support in the form of financial instruments.
Financial instruments should be used to address specific market needs , for actions that have a clear European added value. They should improve the leverage effect of the Union budget spending and achieve a higher multiplier effect in terms of attracting private sector financing.
The overall contribution from the Union budget to the financial instruments shall not exceed 10 % of the overall financial envelope of the CEF.
Report: no later than 31 December 2017, the Commission shall prepare an evaluation report on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures (at the level of results and impacts), the efficiency of the use of resources and the European added value of the CEF, with a view to deciding on the renewal, modification or suspension of the measures.
ENTRY INTO FORCE : 21.12.2013. The Regulation is applicable from 01.01.2014.
DELEGATED ACTS : the Commission may adopt delegated acts to modify the list of general orientations to be taken into account when setting award criteria . The power to adopt such acts is conferred on the Commission from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2020. The European Parliament or the Council may raise objections with regard to a delegated act within two months of the date of notification (which may be extended by two months). If Parliament or Council raise objections, the delegated act will not enter into force.
The European Parliament adopted by 583 votes to 91 with 17 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility.
The Parliament adopted its position in first reading following the ordinary legislative procedure. The amendments adopted in plenary are the result of a compromise agreement between Parliament and Council. They amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Purpose and sco pe: Parliament clarified that the CEF should better enable synergies between the transport, telecommunications and energy sectors to be harnessed to the full, thus enhancing the effectiveness of Union action and enabling implementing costs to be optimised.
The creation of the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) aimed to accelerate investment in the field of trans-European networks and to leverage funding from both the public and the private sectors , while increasing legal certainty and respecting the principle of technological neutrality.
General objectives : the CEF will:
support the implementation of projects of common interest which aim at the development and construction of new infrastructures and services, or at the upgrading of existing infrastructures and services, in the transport, telecommunications and energy sectors ; give priority to missing links in the transport sector ; contribute to supporting projects with a European added value and significant societal benefits which do not receive adequate financing from the market ; contribute to the Europe 2020 Strategy, by developing trans-European networks which take into account expected future traffic flows, and creating an environment more conducive to private, public or public-private investment; enable the Union to achieve its sustainable development targets, thus contributing to the Union's mid-term and long-term objectives in terms of decarbonisation.
1) In the transport sector , Union support would go to projects of common interest, that pursue the following objectives: (i) removing bottlenecks, bridging missing links and, in particular, improving cross-border sections; (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport systems in the long run, with a view to preparing for expected future transport flows, as well as enabling all modes of transport to be decarbonised ; (iii) optimising the integration and interconnection of transport modes and enhancing the interoperability of transport services, while ensuring the accessibility of transport infrastructures
2) In the energy sector , financial support was aimed to: (i): increase competitiveness by promoting the further integration of the internal energy market and the interoperability of electricity and gas networks across borders; (ii) enhancing Union security of energy supply; (iii) contributing to sustainable development by the integration of energy from renewable sources into the transmission network, and by the development of smart energy networks and carbon dioxide networks.
In the first two annual work programmes, priority consideration would be given to projects of common interest and related actions aimed at ending energy isolation and eliminating energy bottlenecks, and at the completion of the internal energy market.
To enhance the multiplier effect of Union financial assistance, the Commission should, subject to market take-up, endeavour to give priority to the use of financial instruments whenever appropriate.
3) In the telecommunications sector , the CEF shall support actions that pursue the objectives specified in a Regulation on guidelines for trans-European networks in the area of telecommunications infrastructure.
Union financial assistance should be granted, as follows:
generic services, core service platforms and programme support actions to be financed though grants and/or procurement; actions in the field of broadband networks to be financed through financial instruments.
Budget : the financial envelope for the implementation of the CEF for the period 2014 to 2020 was set at EUR 33 242 259 000 in current prices. That amount was to be distributed as follows:
transport sector : EUR 26 250 582 000, of which EUR 11 305 500 000 would be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent in line with this Regulation exclusively in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund; telecommunications sector: EUR 1 141 602 000 ; energy sector : EUR 5 850 075 000.
Following the mid-term evaluation, the European Parliament and the Council may, upon a proposal by the Commission, transfer appropriations between the transport, telecommunications and energy sectors of the allocations, with the exception of the amount of EUR 11 305 500 000 transferred from the Cohesion Fund to finance transport sector projects in the Cohesion Fund-eligible Member States.
Conditions of participation : according to the amended text, proposals must be submitted by one or more Member States or, with the agreement of the Member States concerned, by international organisations, joint undertakings, or public or private undertakings or bodies established in Member States.
Financial instruments : these must be used to address specific market needs, for actions that have a clear European added value and should not crowd out private financing . They must improve the leverage effect of the Union budget spending and achieve a higher multiplier effect in terms of attracting private-sector financing.
The overall contribution from the Union budget to the financial instruments shall not exceed 10 % of the overall financial envelope of the CEF.
Report : no later than 31 December 2017, the Commission must prepare an evaluation report to be presented to the European Parliament and the Council on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures (at the level of results and impacts), the efficiency of the use of resources and the European added value of the CEF, with a view to deciding on the renewal, modification or suspension of the measures. The evaluation report must include an assessment of the economies of scale made by the Commission at a financial, technical and human level when managing the CEF and, where applicable, of the total number of projects harnessing the synergies between the sectors.
The Council took note of the state of play on the proposed Regulation establishing the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), the future funding instrument for the trans-European networks (TEN) in the fields of transport, energy and telecommunications.
Good progress has already been made in negotiations between Council and Parliament. There is agreement on the majority of transport issues , on the provisions concerning the use of innovative financial instruments such as project bonds, designed to leverage additional investment from private and public sources, and on the question of whether value added tax should be an eligible cost for grants under the CEF .
However, some energy issues still need further discussion , as do a number of budgetary provisions related to the ongoing negotiations with the Parliament on the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), for the years 2014-2020.
In addition, the part concerning the telecommunications sector will have to be adapted in the light of an amended proposal for guidelines on telecommunication networks , adopted by the Commission at the end of May to take account of the budgetary cuts agreed by the European Council for this sector.
It should be recalled that in February 2013, the European Council agreed on the amounts to be allocated under the CEF to each of the three sectors covered. The final decision on the financial envelope will, however, depend on the outcome of the MFF negotiations . Certain items relating to the MFF negotiations remain open: The first issue relates to the amounts allocated in the financial envelope of the CEF . The percentage for the ceiling of programme support actions is linked to the global amount of the CEF budget.
As far as the issues relating to the EUR 10 billion transferred from the Cohesion Fund are concerned, as well as the question of the VAT eligibility , the EP indicated that the Presidency compromise proposals were acceptable. The same goes for the provisions concerning the financial instruments . The EP also indicated that it could accept most of the wording presented by the Presidency in Part IV of the annex .
Other outstanding issues include:
costs of the TEN-T Executive Agency ; synergies ; the possibility to adopt strategic orientations under delegated acts (with the annual and multi-annual work programmes being adopted by implementing acts); recitals to be examined when an agreement on the normative provisions has been reached ; the text of Part III of the Annex is pending the examination of the Guidelines by the telecommunications working group; discussions on the alignment of the rail freight corridors and core network corridors (Part V of the Annex) are still ongoing.
The general rules laid down in the CEF Regulation will be complemented by sector-specific policy guidelines defining development strategies, priorities and implementation measures for each of the three sectors concerned. These guidelines will be adopted separately from the CEF Regulation . The Council and the Parliament have already reached agreement on the sector-specific guidelines for the energy sector, and a provisional agreement on the transport guidelines is expected to be confirmed soon.
The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy and the Committee on Transport and Tourism (acting as joint committees) adopted the report by Inés AYALA SENDER (S&D, ES), Adina-Ioana VĂLEAN (ADLE, RO) and Dominique RIQUET (EPP, FR) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility.
The committee recommends that the position of the European Parliament adopted in first reading, following the ordinary legislative procedure, should amend the Commission proposal as follows:
Subject-matter and scope : Members clarify that this Regulation shall establish the resources to be made available under the Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 and their governing instruments, in order to support projects of common interest in the field of transport, energy and telecommunications infrastructures and to exploit synergies between those sectors.
General objectives : the Connecting Europe Facility shall give priority to missing infrastructure and :
contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, in line with the Europe 2020 Strategy, by developing modern and high-performing trans-European networks which take into account future traffic flows and creating an environment more conducive to private, public or public-private investment; enable the Union to achieve its sustainable development targets; increase the efficiency of the resources deployed under this Regulation; contribute to supporting projects with a European added value and significant societal benefits which do not receive adequate financing from the market.
(1) In the transport sector , EU support should be directed to the core network (especially the core network corridors) and projects of common interest in the field of traffic management systems. The objectives are mainly: (i) removing bottlenecks and creating missing links; (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long term; (iii) strengthen the accessibility and multimodal transport services; (iv) improve interoperability and safety of transport modes; (v) enable the decarbonisation of all transport modes.
Members would like to stick, at this stage and as a starting point, to the ten pre-identified corridors and other sections presented by the Commission and only propose a slight modification of the horizontal priorities by adding 'Motorways of the seas' so that this concept continues to be a priority for the TEN-T, as well as maritime Intelligent Transport Services.
(2) In the field of energy : In the energy sector, financial aid should focus on completing the internal energy market, ensuring security of supply, ensuring the transmission of renewable electricity from generation to centres of demand and storage, and attracting private investment. A significant part of the budget envisaged should be allocated in the form of financial instruments . Grants can and should be used as a last resort for priority projects where there is no commercial viability, but important positive externalities, without distorting the still developing energy market and without creating artificial competition with private resources.
For the first two work programmes, priority consideration shall be given to projects and actions aiming at ending energy isolation and eliminating energy bottlenecks, while at least 75% of the total financial allocation envisaged for the energy sector under this Regulation shall be assigned to electricity infrastructure projects.
(3) In the field of telecommunications , special emphasis will be given to actions which support cloud and ultra-fast wireless networks deployment objectives. Members state that it is essential to stimulate Union-wide deployment of fast and ultra-fast broadband networks and to facilitate the development and deployment of trans-European digital services.
Generic services, core service platforms and programme support actions shall be financed though grants and/or procurement. Actions in the field of broadband networks may also be financed through grants, for projects which reduce the digital divide by connecting rural, mountainous, remote or sparsely populated regions or islands.
Budget : pending agreement on the Multiannual Financial Framework for the period 2014-2020, Members have left open the exact amount of the financial envelope. The estimated investment requirement for trans-European networks in the transport, energy and telecommunications sectors for the period up to 2020 is EUR 970 000 000 000 .
The financial envelope of the Connecting Europe Facility shall cover expenses pertaining to: (a) actions in support of projects of common interest; (b) programme support actions up to 1.5%. The annual commitments shall be subject to the approval of the European Parliament and the Council, within the limits of the Multiannual Financial Framework.
Procurement : in order to ensure broad and fair competition for projects benefitting from CEF funds, tenders must be based on fair and transparent contract conditions and the form of contract used must be appropriate to the project's objectives and circumstances. Participation in Union-financed projects by undertakings established in third countries must be matched by a requirement for reciprocity in trade relations.
Synergies : in order to give more incentives to projects promoters to come forward with actions with potential synergies between the three sectors, Members propose to introduce a more specific wording on synergies and in particular on the eligibility criteria, cofinancing rates, governing and financial rules. A new tentative list of pre-identified projects with potential synergies is presented in part IIIa of the Annex.
Report : no later than 31 December 2017, an evaluation report shall be presented by the Commission on the achievement of the objectives of all the measures (at the level of results and impacts), the efficiency of the use of resources and its European added value, with a view to a decision on the renewal, modification or suspension of the measures.
The Council took note of the state of play in regard to the proposed Regulation on the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), which is the future funding instrument for the trans-European networks in the transport, energy and telecommunications sectors.
In June 2012, the Council agreed on a partial general approach to the CEF which did not include the financial provisions, pending the negotiations on the new Financial Regulation and on the multi-annual financial framework (MFF) for the years 2014-2020.
Since then, the majority of issues linked to the Financial Regulation have been resolved ; these include:
the choice of financial instruments as an indicator, the forms of financial aid, the bodies implementing the CEF, the provisions concerning cancellation, reduction, suspension or termination of grants, reflows and the annual installments.
Some items relating to the ongoing MFF negotiations are still open. These include:
the amounts allocated in the financial envelope of the CEF . The percentage of 0.35 % for the ceiling of programme support actions is linked to the global amount of EUR 50 billion; the amount transferred from the Cohesion Fund , i.e. the EUR 10 billion transferred from the Cohesion Fund, out of the EUR 31.7 billion allocated for the transport sector, to be used under the rules of the CEF exclusively for Member States eligible for Cohesion Fund; VAT eligibility : whether VAT is a cost for which a grant may be made under the CEF Regulation
Other outstanding issues concern:
the provisions on financial aid through the use of innovative financial instruments such as project bonds, designed to leverage additional investment from private and public sources; the need for further sector-specific discussions will be needed on the infrastructure priorities for the telecommunications sector, as listed in the annex to the CEF Regulation; further examination of the possibility to lay down the main terms, conditions and procedures for each financial instrument in Part IV of the Annex, as well as the related issue of the powers delegated to the Commission.
At the Council meeting, the Commission expressed regret that important cuts to the CEF budget have been proposed in the framework of the MFF negotiations.
The Council agreed on a partial general approach on a draft regulation establishing the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF), the future funding instrument for the trans-European networks (TEN) in the fields of transport, energy and telecommunications. The draft regulation determines the conditions, methods and procedures for the Union's financial contribution to TEN projects, while the development strategies, priorities and implementation measures for each of the sectors are defined in sector-specific policy guidelines which will be adopted separately. The Council has already agreed on a general approach on guidelines for the transport sector in March 2012 (TEN-T guidelines: 8047/12 ).
The overall objective of the CEF is to help create high-performing and environmentally-sustainable interconnected networks across Europe, thereby contributing to economic growth and social and territorial cohesion within the Union. To this end, the CEF will support projects that pursue the following sector-specific objectives:
transport : removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links; ensuring sustainable and efficient transport systems in the long term; improving the integration and interconnection of different transport modes and enhancing interoperability; energy : improving the integration of the internal energy market and the interoperability of energy networks across borders; enhancing security of energy supply; contributing to sustainable development and protection of the environment; telecommunications : building high-speed broadband networks and developing trans-European digital public service infrastructures.
Transport issues : the main outstanding issue concerns requests by several delegations to extend the possibilities of financing road projects by means of grants .
While the transport part of the CEF regulation strongly focuses on the funding of railways and inland waterways, it also, under certain conditions, allows the financing of road projects through grants. As a result of its discussions, the Council agreed to add member states with an isolated rail network without long-distance rail freight transport to the cases where grants can be given to road projects. In addition, it was decided to provide for co-financing of road works at cross-border sections in all member states at a rate of up to 10 %. All those funding possibilities, however, are subject to the general conditions for grants for TEN-T projects. Apart from road financing, in order to reach broad agreement on a final compromise, the Council increased the co-financing rate for the development of the Motorways of the Seas from 20 % to 30 % and added the interconnection of maritime ports to the indicators for achieving the objective of enhanced interconnection and interoperability. In addition, to accommodate requests from delegations, some modifications concerning rail or road sections or ports have been introduced into the list of core network corridors set out in the annex to the regulation. Moreover, it will be clarified in a recital that the completion of the core transport network includes not only the creation of new infrastructure, but also the rehabilitation and upgrading of existing infrastructure.
Financial instruments : some delegations also raised issues related to the financial instruments and other financial provisions under the CEF regulation. However, as those issues are not part of the present general approach, they will need to be addressed later on by budgetary experts. One member state abstained for the time being, pending the outcome on the financial part. Another delegation also underlined that it might be necessary to reopen discussion on certain issues once the budgetary decisions are known.
Funding rates :
The maximum funding rates for the transport sector range from between 20 % and 50 % of the eligible costs. In the energy sector, the maximum rates are 50 %, but can be increased to up to 75 % in specific cases. In the telecommunications sector, broadband networks can receive funding rates of up to 50 % and generic services and cross-cutting priorities rates of up to 75 %, while the "Europeana" digital platform for the European cultural heritage can receive funding rates of up to 100 %.
All those rates may be increased by up to 10 % for measures that have cross-sector synergies or are particularly helpful in combating climate change.
To be eligible for aid from the CEF, the projects must be in line with the requirements set out in the sector-specific guidelines.
Budget : the budget to be made available for the trans-European networks under the CEF will depend on the results of the negotiations on the next multiannual framework and is therefore not yet included in this partial general approach. The Commission has proposed EUR 50 billion for the years 2014 to 2020, with EUR 31.7 billion (including EUR 10 billion earmarked in the Cohesion Fund) allocated to the transport sector, EUR 9.1 billion to the energy sector and about the same amount to the telecommunications sector.
PURPOSE: creation of the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) with a view to accelerating investments in trans-European networks and mobilising funding from both the public and the private sectors.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: in the past decade, infrastructure spending in Europe has been, on average, on a declining path. The economic and financial crisis has, however, brought renewed interest in the need for infrastructure investment. A fully functioning single market depends on modern, highly performing infrastructure connecting Europe particularly in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications. Yet, while regulatory integration advances within the EU and markets become more integrated, cross-border physical interconnection is lagging . Missing links exist, notably in the new Member States, creating dividing lines between the centre and peripheries of the European Union and hampering the further development of intra-Union exchanges or the growth of new economic sectors.
Substantial investment needs have been identified.
In the energy sector , it is estimated that Europe's energy system would require investments of around EUR 1 trillion by 2020 . Of this amount, about EUR 200 billion of investment is needed for electricity and gas networks of European importance alone. EUR 100 billion of this total investment should be delivered by the market unaided, whereas the other EUR 100 billion will require public action to leverage the necessary investments.
In the transport sector , the cost of EU infrastructure development to match the demand for transport has been estimated at over EUR 1.5 trillion for 2010-2030 for the entire transport networks of the EU Member States. The completion of the trans-European transport networks requires about EUR 500 billion by 2020, of which EUR 250 billion would be needed to complete missing links and remove bottlenecks on the core network.
As far as the telecommunication networks are concerned, the investment needs for achieving these objectives are estimated at up to EUR 270 billion, in particular for fast and ultra-fast broadband for all European households and businesses by 2020 . However, in the absence of Union intervention, private sector investment is expected to be not more than EUR 50 billion for the period until 2020. This results in an investment gap of up to EUR 220 billion.
In order to increase the impact of EU budgetary resources, the Commission proposes to tap more systematically into the use of innovative financial instruments to offer an alternative to the traditional grant funding and plug financing gaps for strategic investments.
Building on the experience of financial instruments under the current financial framework put in place in cooperation with the European Investment Bank (EIB), such as the Loan Guarantee Instrument for trans-European transport networks projects (hereafter LGTT), the Commission proposes to implement a significant part of its interventions within the CEF through financial instruments.
The Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative will be used as a means of securing investment resources for infrastructure projects of key strategic European interest.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: nine main policy options were initially considered, starting from the central rationale underlying the Commission's decision to propose the establishment of the Connecting Europe Facility, namely simplifying the existing EU funding framework by drawing on sectoral synergies.
The policy alternatives were built on combinations of scenarios corresponding to three basic options for financial rules simplification – minimal, maximal and variable (or "à la carte") harmonisation of sectoral rules – in the two areas of policy intervention corresponding to the two main specific objectives identified earlier – investment leverage and programme implementation.
The Commission concluded that the policy option where the harmonisation of rules would be variable – i.e. with a number of rules common and a number remaining sector specific – in both the area of investment leverage and that of programme implementation – would be the best option from the perspective of coherence with all the relevant EU policy goals.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 172 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: in its proposal for the next Multi-Annual financial framework for the period 2014-2020: ''A Budget for Europe 2020' ' , the Commission decided to propose the creation of a new integrated instrument for investing in EU infrastructure priorities in Transport, Energy and Telecommunications: the "Connecting Europe Facility" (CEF).
Optimise the impact of funding : the CEF will complement EU direct support with financial instruments in order to optimise the impact of funding. Through the high multiplier effects of financial instruments (which could be as high as 1:15 to 1:20), access to capital for the substantial investment needs will be facilitated.
Together with the successful absorption of direct EU support, the increased reliance on financial instruments will contribute significantly to mitigating risks to project promoters and therefore ensure implementation of projects of common interest. Furthermore, the task is to build an environment conducive to private investment and develop instruments that will be attractive vehicles for specialised infrastructure investors.
General objectives : the CEF’s general objectives in the energy, transport and telecommunications sectors are the following:
to contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks, thus i) bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of competitiveness and economic, social and territorial cohesion within the Single Market, ii) creating an environment more conducive to private and public investment through a combination of financial instruments and Union direct support and iii) by exploiting synergies across the sectors;
to enable the Union to achieve its targets of a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, a 20% increase in energy efficiency and raising the share of renewable energy to 20% up to 2020, while ensuring greater solidarity among Member States.
Specific objectives : the CEF’s specific objectives are as follows:
In the field of transport:
removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links; ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run; optimising the integration and interconnection of transport modes and enhancing interoperability of transport services.
In the energy sector :
promoting the further integration of the internal energy market and the interoperability of electricity and gas networks across borders, including by ensuring that no Member State is isolated from the European network; enhancing Union security of supply; contributing to sustainable development and protection of the environment, notably by fostering the integration of energy from renewable sources into the transmission network and developing carbon dioxide networks.
In the telecommunications sector:
accelerating the deployment of fast and ultrafast broadband networks and their uptake, including by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs); promoting the interconnection and interoperability of national public services online as well as access to such networks. Simplification : the proposal introduces simplification, in particular addressing the following issues: i) alignment of indicators on the Europe 2020 Strategy's objectives; ii) flexibility on budget allocations; iii) centralised management for the three sectors, possibly through implementation via an executive agency; iv) common funding instruments; v) common award criteria; vi) common conditions for financial assistance; vii) one stop visibility through common annual work programmes (important for sectors) and a common committee (important for Member States).
The CEF in the context of the next multiannual financial framework : the Connecting Europe Facility will be an essential element of an EU growth agenda focussed on increasing the EU's long-term growth potential. The Facility will be coordinated with the other interventions coming from the EU budget such as ''Horizon 2020'' and the Cohesion and Structural Funds. Moreover, the Connecting Europe Facility will be a centrally managed facility.
BUDGETARY IMPACT: the Commission’s proposal for the next Multi-Annual financial framework includes a proposal for EUR 50 billion for the period 2014-2020 divided up as follows:
Energy: EUR 9.1 billion; Transport: EUR 21.7 billion; Telecommunications/Digital: EUR 9.2 billion Amounts ring-fenced in the Cohesion Fund for transport infrastructures : EUR 10 billion.
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
PURPOSE: creation of the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) with a view to accelerating investments in trans-European networks and mobilising funding from both the public and the private sectors.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
BACKGROUND: in the past decade, infrastructure spending in Europe has been, on average, on a declining path. The economic and financial crisis has, however, brought renewed interest in the need for infrastructure investment. A fully functioning single market depends on modern, highly performing infrastructure connecting Europe particularly in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications. Yet, while regulatory integration advances within the EU and markets become more integrated, cross-border physical interconnection is lagging . Missing links exist, notably in the new Member States, creating dividing lines between the centre and peripheries of the European Union and hampering the further development of intra-Union exchanges or the growth of new economic sectors.
Substantial investment needs have been identified.
In the energy sector , it is estimated that Europe's energy system would require investments of around EUR 1 trillion by 2020 . Of this amount, about EUR 200 billion of investment is needed for electricity and gas networks of European importance alone. EUR 100 billion of this total investment should be delivered by the market unaided, whereas the other EUR 100 billion will require public action to leverage the necessary investments.
In the transport sector , the cost of EU infrastructure development to match the demand for transport has been estimated at over EUR 1.5 trillion for 2010-2030 for the entire transport networks of the EU Member States. The completion of the trans-European transport networks requires about EUR 500 billion by 2020, of which EUR 250 billion would be needed to complete missing links and remove bottlenecks on the core network.
As far as the telecommunication networks are concerned, the investment needs for achieving these objectives are estimated at up to EUR 270 billion, in particular for fast and ultra-fast broadband for all European households and businesses by 2020 . However, in the absence of Union intervention, private sector investment is expected to be not more than EUR 50 billion for the period until 2020. This results in an investment gap of up to EUR 220 billion.
In order to increase the impact of EU budgetary resources, the Commission proposes to tap more systematically into the use of innovative financial instruments to offer an alternative to the traditional grant funding and plug financing gaps for strategic investments.
Building on the experience of financial instruments under the current financial framework put in place in cooperation with the European Investment Bank (EIB), such as the Loan Guarantee Instrument for trans-European transport networks projects (hereafter LGTT), the Commission proposes to implement a significant part of its interventions within the CEF through financial instruments.
The Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative will be used as a means of securing investment resources for infrastructure projects of key strategic European interest.
IMPACT ASSESSMENT: nine main policy options were initially considered, starting from the central rationale underlying the Commission's decision to propose the establishment of the Connecting Europe Facility, namely simplifying the existing EU funding framework by drawing on sectoral synergies.
The policy alternatives were built on combinations of scenarios corresponding to three basic options for financial rules simplification – minimal, maximal and variable (or "à la carte") harmonisation of sectoral rules – in the two areas of policy intervention corresponding to the two main specific objectives identified earlier – investment leverage and programme implementation.
The Commission concluded that the policy option where the harmonisation of rules would be variable – i.e. with a number of rules common and a number remaining sector specific – in both the area of investment leverage and that of programme implementation – would be the best option from the perspective of coherence with all the relevant EU policy goals.
LEGAL BASIS: Article 172 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
CONTENT: in its proposal for the next Multi-Annual financial framework for the period 2014-2020: ''A Budget for Europe 2020' ' , the Commission decided to propose the creation of a new integrated instrument for investing in EU infrastructure priorities in Transport, Energy and Telecommunications: the "Connecting Europe Facility" (CEF).
Optimise the impact of funding : the CEF will complement EU direct support with financial instruments in order to optimise the impact of funding. Through the high multiplier effects of financial instruments (which could be as high as 1:15 to 1:20), access to capital for the substantial investment needs will be facilitated.
Together with the successful absorption of direct EU support, the increased reliance on financial instruments will contribute significantly to mitigating risks to project promoters and therefore ensure implementation of projects of common interest. Furthermore, the task is to build an environment conducive to private investment and develop instruments that will be attractive vehicles for specialised infrastructure investors.
General objectives : the CEF’s general objectives in the energy, transport and telecommunications sectors are the following:
to contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks, thus i) bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of competitiveness and economic, social and territorial cohesion within the Single Market, ii) creating an environment more conducive to private and public investment through a combination of financial instruments and Union direct support and iii) by exploiting synergies across the sectors;
to enable the Union to achieve its targets of a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, a 20% increase in energy efficiency and raising the share of renewable energy to 20% up to 2020, while ensuring greater solidarity among Member States.
Specific objectives : the CEF’s specific objectives are as follows:
In the field of transport:
removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links; ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run; optimising the integration and interconnection of transport modes and enhancing interoperability of transport services.
In the energy sector :
promoting the further integration of the internal energy market and the interoperability of electricity and gas networks across borders, including by ensuring that no Member State is isolated from the European network; enhancing Union security of supply; contributing to sustainable development and protection of the environment, notably by fostering the integration of energy from renewable sources into the transmission network and developing carbon dioxide networks.
In the telecommunications sector:
accelerating the deployment of fast and ultrafast broadband networks and their uptake, including by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs); promoting the interconnection and interoperability of national public services online as well as access to such networks. Simplification : the proposal introduces simplification, in particular addressing the following issues: i) alignment of indicators on the Europe 2020 Strategy's objectives; ii) flexibility on budget allocations; iii) centralised management for the three sectors, possibly through implementation via an executive agency; iv) common funding instruments; v) common award criteria; vi) common conditions for financial assistance; vii) one stop visibility through common annual work programmes (important for sectors) and a common committee (important for Member States).
The CEF in the context of the next multiannual financial framework : the Connecting Europe Facility will be an essential element of an EU growth agenda focussed on increasing the EU's long-term growth potential. The Facility will be coordinated with the other interventions coming from the EU budget such as ''Horizon 2020'' and the Cohesion and Structural Funds. Moreover, the Connecting Europe Facility will be a centrally managed facility.
BUDGETARY IMPACT: the Commission’s proposal for the next Multi-Annual financial framework includes a proposal for EUR 50 billion for the period 2014-2020 divided up as follows:
Energy: EUR 9.1 billion; Transport: EUR 21.7 billion; Telecommunications/Digital: EUR 9.2 billion Amounts ring-fenced in the Cohesion Fund for transport infrastructures : EUR 10 billion.
DELEGATED ACTS: the proposal contains provisions empowering the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Documents
- For information: COM(2018)0612
- For information: EUR-Lex
- For information: EUR-Lex
- For information: SWD(2018)0398
- Follow-up document: COM(2018)0066
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: SWD(2018)0044
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)87
- Final act published in Official Journal: Regulation 2013/1316
- Final act published in Official Journal: OJ L 348 20.12.2013, p. 0129
- Draft final act: 00076/2013/LEX
- Results of vote in Parliament: Results of vote in Parliament
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T7-0463/2013
- Debate in Parliament: Debate in Parliament
- Debate in Council: 3243
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A7-0021/2013
- Specific opinion: PE504.159
- Debate in Council: 3213
- Committee opinion: PE491.329
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE497.891
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.337
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.338
- Committee opinion: PE492.829
- Committee draft report: PE491.110
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR0648/2012
- Debate in Council: 3171
- Contribution: COM(2011)0665
- Contribution: COM(2011)0665
- Contribution: COM(2011)0665
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0489/2012
- Contribution: COM(2011)0665
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0665
- Legislative proposal: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1262
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1263
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2011)0665
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Legislative proposal: COM(2011)0665 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1262 EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2011)1263 EUR-Lex
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES0489/2012
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR0648/2012
- Committee draft report: PE491.110
- Committee opinion: PE492.829
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.337
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE496.338
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE497.891
- Committee opinion: PE491.329
- Specific opinion: PE504.159
- Draft final act: 00076/2013/LEX
- Commission response to text adopted in plenary: SP(2014)87
- Follow-up document: COM(2018)0066 EUR-Lex
- Follow-up document: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0044
- For information: COM(2018)0612 EUR-Lex
- For information: EUR-Lex SWD(2018)0398
- Contribution: COM(2011)0665
- Contribution: COM(2011)0665
- Contribution: COM(2011)0665
- Contribution: COM(2011)0665
Votes
A7-0021/2013 - Adina-Ioana Vălean, Dominique Riquet et Inés Ayala Sender - Résolution législative #
Amendments | Dossier |
788 |
2011/0302(COD)
2012/09/03
BUDG
18 amendments...
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 a (new) (6a) With a view to financing infrastructure in cross-border regions as part of the development of the network as a whole, strong synergies should be generated between the financing instruments of the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and the European Regional Development Fund.
Amendment 24 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – point b a (new) (ba) as a matter of priority bridge missing links in cross-border sections and remove bottlenecks.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i i) removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links both within transport infrastructures and at the connecting points between them at border-crossing points, to be measured by the
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a) Transport: EUR 31 694 000 000, out of which EUR 10 000 000 000 shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent in line with this Regulation, exclusively in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund;
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The financial envelope of the Connecting Europe Facility may cover expenses pertaining to, preparatory, monitoring, control, audit
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) actions supporting new technologies and innovation for all modes of transport.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. Technical and administrative assistance shall be regarded as an eligible cost.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Proposals may be submitted by one or several Member States, international organisations, joint undertakings, such as the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation, or public or private undertakings or bodies established in Member States.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i i) rail and inland waterways: the amount of Union financial aid shall
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, actions to reduce rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock,
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Applicable rules for the transport sector under this Regulation shall apply to these specific calls. When implementing these
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The EUR 10 000 000 000 transferred from the Cohesion Fund shall not count towards the ceiling of 2.5% of GDP on Structural Fund assistance which countries eligible for support under the Cohesion Fund may receive.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. To ensure the highest possible take-up rate of the transferred funds in all Member States eligible for support under the Cohesion Fund, particular attention shall be paid to programme support actions under this Regulation aimed at strengthening institutional capacity and the efficiency of public administrations and public services involved in the development and implementation of projects designed to achieve CEF objectives.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Financial instruments shall address one or more specific policy objectives of the Union in a non-discriminatory fashion, have a clear end-date, be consistent with the principles of sound financial management and complement traditional instruments such as grants.
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 1. No later than mid-201
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 - section 1 - part 8 - insert new line 2 in title Sligo - Derry - Belfast
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 - section 1 - part 8 - paragraph 1 a (new) Pre-identified sections Mode Description/dates Dublin - Belfast Rail Upgrading; Dublin Interconectors (DART) Sligo - Derry - Belfast Rail studies "Western Arc" rail network, extending from Belfast through Derry, Sligo, Knock, Galway to Limerick/Foynes and Cork Glasgow - Edinburgh Rail upgrading High Speed 2 Rail studies Cardiff - Bristol - London Rail upgrading Dublin, Cork, Southampton, Le Havre Ports hinterland connections Le Havre - Paris IWW upgrading Le Havre - Paris Rail studies
source: PE-494.792
2012/09/20
REGI
130 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail and inland waterways and motorways of the sea: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible costs; the funding rate may be increased to 30% for actions addressing bottlenecks; the funding rate may be increased to 40% for actions concerning cross-border sections;
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail and inland waterways: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, actions to reduce rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock, facilitating its modernisation with the aim of reducing all polluting emissions, as well as development of ports and multi-modal platforms: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost;
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, actions to reduce rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock, as well as development of ports and multi-modal platforms: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, actions to reduce rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock, as well as development of ports in all regions and multi-modal platforms: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, actions to reduce rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock, as well as development of ports and multi-modal platforms: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, actions to reduce rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) all Union financial aid for road projects shall not exceed 30% of the total amounts spent for rail, walking and cycling projects;
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (i) the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) and rail freight's noise reduction at the source: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 50% of the eligible cost;
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (i) the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) and River Information Systems: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 50% of the eligible cost;
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 5. Co-financing rates mentioned above may be increased by up to 10 percentage points for actions having cross-sector synergies, reaching climate mitigation objectives, enhancing climate resilience or reducing the greenhouse gas emissions and in the case of investments in areas with natural disadvantages, such as the outermost regions, in line with Articles 355 and 375 TFEU. This increase should not apply to co-
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – title Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. As regards the EUR
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. As regards the EUR
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Applicable rules for the transport sector under this Regulation shall apply to these specific calls. When implementing these calls,
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Applicable rules for the transport sector under this Regulation shall apply to these specific calls. When implementing these calls, greatest possible priority shall be given to projects concerning cross-border sections and respecting the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund.
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Applicable rules for the transport sector under this Regulation shall apply to these specific calls. When implementing these calls, greatest possible priority shall be given to projects respecting the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund, with the goal of eliminating obstacles to mobility, including in remote, outlying or outermost regions.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Applicable rules for the transport sector under this Regulation shall apply to these specific calls.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. By the way of derogation from Article 10, and as regards the EUR
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. By the way of derogation from Article 10, and as regards the EUR
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point i (i) rail and inland waterways
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii (iii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, development of multi-modal platforms and of ports and sustainable maritime connections;
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii (iii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, development of multi-modal platforms and of ports, and actions to support new technologies and innovation for all forms of transport;
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii (iii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, development of multi-modal platforms and of ports
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii a (new) (iiia) actions targeting the reduction of rail noise including by retrofitting of existing rolling stock in order to ensure viable use of the TEN-T network respecting noise level requirements.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii a (new) (iiia) maritime and air transport connections with remote and island regions with severe communication bottlenecks with the European continent.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c – point i (i) the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS); the River Information Services (RIS) and the Vessel Traffic Monitoring and Information systems (VTMIS).
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c – point ii a (new) (iia) actions to support the development of the motorways of the sea.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. To ensure the highest possible absorption of the funds made available from the Cohesion Fund for Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund, particular support shall be given to programme support actions under the Connecting Europe Facility aimed at strengthening institutional capacity and the efficiency of public administrations and public services related to the development and implementation of projects referred to in paragraph 1.
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. In order to support Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund, which may experience difficulties in designing projects that are of a sufficient maturity, quality and EU added-value, the Commission shall organise additional calls. To ensure the highest possible absorption of the transferred funds in all Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund, particular attention shall be given to programme support actions under the Connecting Europe Facility aimed at strengthening institutional capacity and the efficiency of public administrations and public services related to the development and implementation of projects listed in Annex 1 of this Regulation.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. The resources of the Cohesion Fund used to finance for transport sector projects in the Cohesion Fund eligible Member States shall not count against the Cohesion Policy's capping system.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) following an evaluation of the progress of the project, in particular in the event of major delays in the implementation of the action resulting from direct responsibility of the beneficiaries.
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. Actions supported by means of financial instruments shall be selected on a first come first served basis and shall seek sectoral diversification in accordance with Articles 3 and 4 as well as
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. The Commission shall adopt programmes specifically addressing the problems of remoteness and isolation in the fields of transport, energy and communications, so that the objectives of this Regulation can be achieved in the outermost regions.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 2 Member States shall for projects related to transport
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 3 In the field of telecommunications
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall take appropriate measures ensuring that, when actions financed under this Regulation are implemented, the financial interests of the Union are protected by ensuring that costs are not disproportionate for infrastructure of the same type in the different Member States taking into due consideration local prices, by the application of preventive measures against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities, by effective checks and, if irregularities are detected, by the recovery of the amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by effective, proportional and deterrent penalties.
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall be assisted by a Coordination Committee of the Facility and by committees established for each of the three sectors of the Instrument - transport, energy and telecommunications infrastructure. Th
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. The Coordination committee shall ensure a horizontal overview of the work programmes referred to in Article 17 to ensure consistency and that synergies are identified and exploited between sectors. The committees of respective sectors shall help the Commission monitor implementation of the respective guidelines and shall take part in their reviews.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall implement information and communication actions on the Connecting Europe Facility projects and results. The Commission shall also make placing information and communications on the Connecting Europe Facility projects and results on the Internet a priority. Moreover, budget allocated to communication under this Regulation shall also cover corporate communication on the political priorities of the Union.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 2 – paragraph 1 BY border – Warzsawa – Poznań – Frankfurt/Oder – Berlin – Hannover – Osnabrück –Rheine- Twente/Mittellandkanal- Enschede – Hengelo-Utrecht – Amsterdam/Rotterdam – Felixstowe – Birmingham/Manchester – Liverpool Inland Waterway (IWW): Feasibility study for the connection between the Mittellandcanal and the Twentecanal
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 2 – paragraph 1 BY border – Warzsawa – Poznań – Frankfurt/Oder – Berlin – Hannover – Osnabrück – Airport Münster/Osnabrück FMO – Enschede – Utrecht – Amsterdam/Rotterdam – Felixstowe – Birmingham/Manchester – Liverpool Rail, Airport: rail – airport Münster- Osnabrück interconnection
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 2 – paragraph 1 BY border – Warzsawa – Poznań – Frankfurt/Oder – Berlin – Hannover – Osnabrück – Hengelo/Twente – Enschede – Utrecht – Amsterdam/Rotterdam – Felixstowe – Birmingham/Manchester – Liverpool Rail: upgrading of several sections (Hannover – Osnabrück – Hengelo/Twente; especially Minden/Seelze - Hannover and Twente- Bypass)
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 2 – paragraph 1 BY border – Warzsawa – Poznań – Frankfurt/Oder – Berlin – Hannover – West-German Canals, Mittellandkanal – Osnabrück – Enschede – Utrecht – Amsterdam/Rotterdam – Felixstowe – Birmingham/Manchester – Liverpool Pre-identified sections: West-German Canals, Mittellandkanal, Hannover – Magdeburg - Berlin Mode: IWW Description/dates: Upgrading (e.g. elevation of the bridges allowing three layers of containers) incl. links to the other modes
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 2 – paragraph 1 BY border – Warzsawa – Poznań – Frankfurt/Oder – Berlin – Hannover – Osnabrück – Enschede – Utrecht – Amsterdam/Rotterdam – Felixstowe – Birmingham/Manchester – Liverpool
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 2 – paragraph 1 BY border – Warzsawa – Poznań – Frankfurt/Oder – Berlin – Hannover – Osnabrück – Enschede – Utrecht – Amsterdam/Rotterdam – Felixstowe – Birmingham/Manchester – Liverpool Pre-identified sections: Berlin – Hannover – NL Mode: Road Description/dates: Upgrading of several sections (Dutch A1, German A30) incl. links to the north-south axes
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 2 – paragraph 1 BY border – Warzsawa – Poznań – Frankfurt/Oder – Berlin – Hannover – Osnabrück – Enschede – Utrecht – Amsterdam/Rotterdam – Felixstowe – Birmingham/Manchester – Liverpool Pre-identified sections: Ruhr area - Münster -Osnabrück - Hamburg Mode: Road Description/dates: Expansion of German A1 to six lanes, section "Kamen-cross" till "cross Lotte/Osnabrück
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 2 – paragraph 1 Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 2 – table 1 – row 2 – column 1 Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 7 – paragraph 1 - line 2 Lisboa – Aveiro – Oporto – Vigo (This link will connect the Portuguese corridor with Galicia, thereby safeguarding the conventional Porto-Vigo line and preventing its closure, and will connect with the Galicia-Portugal Atlantic corridor.)
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 1 - section b – row - 1 (new) Bucharest to Republic of Moldova border – Cross-Border – Rail – studies ongoing
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 1 - section b – row 27 a (new) UA border (Lviv) – Lublin – Warzsawa Cross-border Rail upgrading line
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 2 – table a – row 8 a (new) 8a. Oil supply diversification corridors in Central Eastern Europe ("OSC"): Objective Interoperability of the oil pipeline network in Central Eastern Europe to increase security of supply and reduce environmental risks. Member States concerned: Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 1 Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 172, 174 and 349 thereof,
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) A fully functioning single market depends on modern, integrated, highly performing infrastructure connecting Europe particularly in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications. These growth enhancing connections would provide better access to the internal market and consequently contribute to a more competitive market economy in line with Europe 2020 Strategy's objectives and targets.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) A fully functioning single market depends on modern, highly performing infrastructure connecting Europe and its regions, particularly in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications. These growth enhancing connections would provide better access to the internal market and consequently contribute to a more competitive market economy in line with Europe 2020 Strategy's objectives and targets.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The Commission has committed to mainstream climate change into Union spending programmes and to direct at least 20% of the Union budget to climate-related objectives. It is important to ensure that climate change mitigation and adaptation as well as risk prevention and management are promoted in the preparation, design and implementation of projects of common interest. Infrastructure investments covered by this Regulation should contribute to promoting the transition to a low-carbon and climate- and disaster-resilient economy and society
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The Commission has committed to mainstream climate change into Union spending programmes and to direct at least 20% of the Union budget to climate-related objectives. It is important to ensure that climate change mitigation and adaptation as well as risk prevention and management are promoted in the preparation, design and implementation of projects of common interest. Infrastructure investments covered by this Regulation should contribute to promoting the transition to a low-carbon and climate- and disaster-resilient economy and society. The Commission should ensure that international agreements and standards applicable within the internal market are applied even-handedly to the Member States, without causing distortions of competition, in order to ensure the success of European undertakings in the face of global competition.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) On 28 March 2011, the Commission adopted the White Paper ''A Roadmap to a Single Transport Area ― Towards a competitive and resource-efficient transport system''. The White Paper aims at reducing by at least 60% the greenhouse gas emissions (''GHG'') of the transport sector by 2050 with respect to 1990. As far as infrastructure is concerned, the White Paper aims at establishing a fully functional and Union-wide multimodal TEN-T ‘core network’ by 2030. The White Paper also aims at optimising the performance of multimodal logistic chains, including by making greater use of more energy-efficient modes. Therefore, it sets the following relevant targets for TEN-T policy: 30% of road freight over 300 km should shift to other modes by 2030, and more than 50% by 2050; the length of the existing high-speed rail network should triple by 2030 and by 2050 the majority of medium-distance passenger transport should go by rail; by 2050, all core network airports should be connected to the rail network; all seaports, including those in outlying areas, to the rail freight and, where possible, to the inland waterway system
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) In order to achieve their integration into the internal market and promote their development, the outermost regions still face an urgent need to optimise their transport links, particularly in the area of maritime passenger and goods transport and air links with the European mainland, and to optimise their energy options as isolated energy systems.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) On the basis of the objectives set by the White Paper, the TEN-T guidelines as laid down in Regulation (EU) No XXX/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of …20 identify the infrastructure of the trans-European transport network, specify the requirements to be fulfilled by it and provide for measures for their implementation. The Guidelines envisage in particular the completion of the core network by 2030 through the creation of new infrastructure as well as the rehabilitation and upgrading of existing infrastructure.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) The nine Rail Freight Corridors, six ERTMS-corridors, 'Green' corridors and the ten Comprehensive Network Corridors should be integrated into a sustainable intermodal concept;
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Based on an analysis of the transport infrastructure plans of Member States, the Commission estimates that investment needs in transport amount to EUR 500 billion in the entirety of the TEN-T network for the period 2014-2020, of which an estimated EUR 250 billion will need to be invested in the core network of the TEN-T. Given the resources available at Union level, concentration on the projects with the highest European added value is necessary to achieve the desired impact. Support should therefore be focussed on the core network (in particular, the core network corridors), without excluding support for the comprehensive network, and on the projects of common interest in the field of traffic management systems (notably the air traffic management systems resulting from SESAR which require Union budgetary resources of about EUR 3 billion).
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Based on an analysis of the transport infrastructure plans of Member States, the Commission estimates that investment needs in transport amount to EUR 500 billion in the entirety of the TEN-T network for the period 2014-2020, of which an estimated EUR 250 billion will need to be invested in the core network of the TEN-T. Given the resources available at Union level, concentration on the projects with the highest European added value is necessary to achieve the desired impact. Support should therefore be focussed on the core network (in particular, the core network corridors) and on the projects of common interest in the field of traffic management systems (notably the air traffic management systems resulting from SESAR which require Union budgetary resources of about EUR 3 billion). Sufficient EU funding must be earmarked for projects for a comprehensive network, because such a network is the most effective way of supporting the Union’s objectives with regard to increasing social and territorial cohesion and improving access to the regions throughout the Union’s territory.
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11a) In its communication ‘The outermost regions of the European Union: towards a partnership for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’, of 20 June 2012, the Commission emphasises the specific characteristics of the outermost regions, as recognised in Articles 349 and 355 of the TFEU, and contemplates their inclusion in relevant specific projects of common interest in the fields of transport, telecommunications and energy, to assist their integration into the internal market and promote their economic development. With a view to this, they should receive Commission support in drawing up a portfolio of specific projects.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR 10 billion22 ) should be transferred to finance transport projects on the transport core network in the Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund under the Connecting Europe Facility. The Commission should support Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund to develop an adequate pipeline of projects in order to
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR 10 billion) should be transferred to finance transport projects on the transport core network in the Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) Institutional and administrative capacity are essential prerequisites for an effective delivery of the objectives of the Connecting Europe Facility. The Commission should ensure that they are always at a sufficient level to design and implement projects, and wherever necessary it should offer appropriate means to the Member State concerned.
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Telecommunications are increasingly becoming internet-based infrastructures, with broadband networks and digital services closely interrelated. The internet is becoming the dominant platform for communication, offering services, and doing business. Therefore the trans- European availability of fast Internet access and digital services is essential for economic growth, territorial cohesion, consumer protection and the Single Market.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Telecommunications are increasingly becoming internet-based infrastructures, with broadband networks and digital services closely interrelated. The internet is becoming the dominant platform for communication, offering services, and doing business. Therefore the trans-
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) It is necessary to develop strong and coherent EU-wide networks for the digital delivery of public-good actions, involving both public and civil society actors at national
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) The Connecting Europe Facility should propose financial instruments to promote substantial participation by the private sector investors and financial institutions in infrastructure investment. To be sufficiently attractive to the private sector, financial instruments should be
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40) With respect to the conditions for the financial instruments, it might be necessary to add additional requirements in the Work Programmes, for example to ensure a competitive and equitable internal market
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 41 (41) Multi-annual programming for support from the Facility should be directed towards supporting the Union's priorities by ensuring the availability of the necessary financial resources and the consistency, fairness and continuity of joint action by the Union and the Member States. For proposals submitted following the implementation of the first multiannual work programme in the sector of transport, eligibility of cost should start on 1 January 2014 to ensure the continuity of projects already covered by Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport and energy networks.
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 (44) On the basis of the sector specific guidelines laid down in separate Regulations, a list of priority areas for which this Regulation should apply has been drawn up and should be included in the Annex. In order to take into account possible changes in political priorities and technological capabilities, as well as traffic flows, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Some of the infrastructure projects of Union interest might need to link with and pass through neighbourhood, pre-accession and other third countries, particularly important trade partners of the Union such as Russia. The Connecting Europe Facility should offer simplified means of linking and financing these infrastructures, in order to ensure coherence between internal and external instruments of the Union budget.
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) "cross-border section" means the section, which ensures the continuity of a project of common interest between at least two Member States or border regions, or between a Member State or region and a neighbouring country or region;
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 10 a (new) (10a) "comprehensive network" means a Europe-wide transport network, as provided for in Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines] ensuring the access to the internal market and interconnectivity of all regions in the Union, including the remote, outermost and very sparsely populated regions, thus strengthening the economic, social and territorial cohesion between Member States, within them and between Member States and third countries.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘bottleneck’ means a physical barrier
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The Connecting Europe Facility shall enable the preparation and implementation of projects of common interest within the framework of the trans-European networks policy in the sectors of energy, transport and telecommunications. In particular the Connecting Europe Facility shall support the implementation of projects aiming at the development and construction of new or upgrading of existing infrastructure in the field of transport, energy and telecommunications and giving priority to missing infrastructure. To this end, the Connecting Europe Facility shall pursue the following objectives:
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks, thus bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of competitiveness and economic, social and territorial cohesion within the Single Market and creating an environment more conducive to private and public investment through a combination of financial instruments and Union direct support and by exploiting synergies across the sectors. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the volume of public and private investment in projects of common interest, and in particular the volume of public and private investments in projects of common interest realised through the financial instruments under this Regulation. All EU co-financed transport infrastructure must be earmarked for green and sustainable intermodal infrastructure networks with a strong focus on the European added value of adding trans-border rail missing links and sustainable projects in and between new Member States.
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transport: contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks, thus bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks which take account of future traffic flows, thus bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of competitiveness and economic, social and territorial cohesion within the Single Market and creating an environment more conducive to private and public investment through a combination of financial instruments and Union direct support and
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) a)contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks, thus bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of competitiveness and economic, social and territorial cohesion within the Single Market and creating an environment more conducive to private and public investment through a combination of financial instruments and Union direct support and by exploiting synergies across the sectors. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the volume of public and private investment in projects of common interest, and in particular the volume of public and private investments in projects of common interest realised through the financial instruments under this Regulation and in conjunction with other financial resources.
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) connect urban and rural areas by trans-border feed-in lines to the CEF corridors.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (i) removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links both within transport infrastructure and at the connecting points at cross-border level, to be measured by the number of new and improved cross-border connections and removed bottlenecks on
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (i) removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links, particularly in order to cover mountainous and island regions and regions with low population density, to be measured by the number of new and improved cross-border connections and removed bottlenecks on transport routes which have benefited from the CEF;
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (i) removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links, to be measured by the number of new and improved internal and cross-border connections and removed bottlenecks on transport routes which have benefited from the Connecting Europe Facility;
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i a (new) (ia) promoting the creation of infrastructure management and ownership bodies with more than one Member State, or with subnational bodies endowed with law-making powers from two Member States or more, as shareholders. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the number of railway infrastructure management or ownership bodies funded by the Connecting Europe Facility which have two or more Member States among their shareholders.
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i a (new) (ia) promote improvements in accessibility, as being of key importance to the development of the regions, including outermost, island, cross-border and mountain regions, with mobility and accessibility constraints, thereby helping to eliminate socially and economically negative repercussions.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii a (new) (iiia) preparing for future transport flows by taking into account, inter alia, the length of new raw material transport routes;
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) promoting the further integration of the internal energy market and the interoperability of electricity and gas networks across borders, including by ensuring that no Member State is isolated from the European network, to be measured by the number of projects effectively interconnecting Member states‘ networks and removing internal bottlenecks by taking into account also the future sources of energy available in the Member states;
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) enhancing Union security of supply and efficiency of supply by means of infrastructure modernisation, to be measured by the evolution of system resiliance and security of system operations as well as number of projects allowing diversification of supply sources, supplying counterparts and routes;
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii (iii) contributing to sustainable development and protection of the environment, notably by fostering the integration of energy from renewable sources into the transmission network
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i (i) accelerating the deployment of fast and ultrafast broadband networks
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i (i) accelerating the deployment of fast and ultrafast broadband networks
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i (i) accelerating the deployment of fast and ultrafast broadband networks in and between all regions of the EU and their uptake, including by small and medium- sized enterprises (SMEs), to be measured by the level of broadband and ultrafast broadband coverage and the number of households having subscribed for broadband connections for above 100 Mbps;
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii (ii) promoting the interconnection and interoperability of national public services on-line as well as access to such networks, especially in rural areas, to be measured by the percentage of citizens and businesses using public services on-line and the availability of such services across borders.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii (ii) promoting the interconnection and interoperability of national public services on-line, by means of the facilities offered by e-government, as well as access to such networks, to be measured by the percentage of citizens and businesses using public services on-line and the availability of such services across borders.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The financial envelope for the implementation of the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014 to 2020 shall be EUR
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transport: EUR
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transport: EUR 31 694 000 000, out of which EUR
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transport: EUR 31 694 000 000,
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transport: EUR 31 694 000 000, out of which EUR 10 000 000 000 shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) energy: EUR
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) telecommunications: EUR
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Following the mid-term evaluation according to Article 26(1), the Commission may transfer appropriations between the sectors of the allocation set out in paragraph 1 up to a maximum of 10% per sector, with the exception of the EUR
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Following the mid-term evaluation according to Article 26.1, the Commission may transfer appropriations between the sectors of the allocation set out in paragraph 1, with the exception of the EUR
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Following the mid-term evaluation according to Article 26(1), the Commission may transfer appropriations between the sectors of the allocation set out in paragraph 1
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) actions implementing the core network according to Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines], including the deployment of new technologies and innovation according to Article 39 of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines], as well as studies into the socio-economic impact implementing and structuring these objectives may have;
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) actions implementing exclusively the core network according to Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines], including the deployment of new technologies and innovation according to Article 39 of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines];
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) actions improving and upgrading existing rail infrastructure;
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) actions implementing the comprehensive network in compliance with Chapter II of the EU Regulation on the TEN-T guidelines, where such actions help to interconnect all the EU's regions, including the most remote and outermost regions and contribute to the development of the core network;
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f (f) actions t
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f (f) actions to reduce rail freight noise by the retrofitting and modernisation of existing rolling stock;
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) The Commission shall stimulate and facilitate the achievement of the agreement referred to in the previous subparagraph, and shall report every year to the Parliament on the cases where problems are encountered, and on the nature of the difficulties.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 6 Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 7 7. Not recoverable VAT shall
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 7 7. VAT shall not be an eligible cost unless it may be recovered by the final beneficiary under national VAT legislation.
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 7 7. Non-refundable VAT shall
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 7 7. VAT shall
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Proposals may be submitted by one or several Member States, subnational bodies endowed with law-making powers, international organisations, joint undertakings, or public or private undertakings or bodies established in Member States.
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail and inland waterways: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost; the funding rate may be increased to 30% for actions addressing bottlenecks; the funding rate may be increased to 40% for actions
source: PE-496.462
2012/10/10
TRAN, ITRE
484 amendments...
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The creation of the Connecting Europe Facility should maximise the potential for
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The creation of the Connecting Europe Facility should maximise the potential for sustainable growth through the realisation of synergies between transport, energy and telecommunications policies and their implementation, thus enhancing the efficiency of the Union's intervention.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1)
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The creation of the Connecting Europe Facility should maximise the potential for sustainable and environmentally friendly growth through the realisation of synergies between transport, energy and telecommunications policies and their implementation, thus enhancing the efficiency of the Union's intervention.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 (1) The creation of the Connecting Europe Facility should maximise the potential for growth and jobs through the realisation of synergies between transport, energy and telecommunications policies and their implementation, thus enhancing the efficiency of the Union's intervention.
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1 a) There is an urgent need for financial simplification in order to seize the advantages of the potential synergies in the deployment, development and maintenance throughout the telecommunications and the energy networks.
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 a (new) (1 a) The development of transport infrastructure policy should take into account the environmental footprint, the financial crisis and the resulting lack of public funding, the demographic change and the accessibility needs of all citizens and regions. It should focus on smart investments that generate economic, social and environmental benefits in the shorter term and create jobs, while avoiding delay caused by mega-projects that cannot be implemented by the 2030 deadline for the core network.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) A fully functioning single market depends on modern, highly performing infrastructure connecting Europe particularly in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications. These growth enhancing connections would provide better access to the internal market and consequently contribute to a more
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) A fully functioning single market depends on modern, highly performing infrastructure connecting Europe and its regions, particularly in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications. These growth enhancing connections would provide better access to the internal market and consequently contribute to a more competitive market economy in line with Europe 2020 Strategy's objectives and targets.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2)
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) A fully functioning single market depends on modern, highly performing infrastructure connecting Europe particularly in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications. These
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) A fully functioning single market depends on modern, highly performing infrastructure connecting Europe particularly in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications. These growth enhancing connections would provide better access to the internal market, facilitate cross-border interactions and consequently contribute to a more
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 a (new) (2a) The Connecting Europe Facility reflects the priority industrial sectors for Europe. It will become an essential instrument for establishing a European industrial policy which is a source of sustainable growth.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The creation of a Connecting Europe Facility aims at increasing legal certainty, and accelerating the investments in the field of trans-European networks, and leverage funding from both the public and private sectors.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The creation of a Connecting Europe
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 a (new) (4a) In the energy and transport sectors the Connecting Europe Facility should not only contribute to achieving the current objectives of a 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, a 20% improvement in energy efficiency and a 20% share of energy from renewables, but should also lay the foundations for a climate and energy policy framework for the period after 2020, when further developments on renewable energy and on reducing climate-relevant emissions will be crucial.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The Commission has committed to mainstream climate change into Union spending programmes and to direct at least 20% of the Union budget to climate-related
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) T
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The Commission has committed to mainstream climate change into Union spending programmes and to direct at least 20% of the Union budget to climate-related objectives.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The Commission has committed to mainstream climate change into Union spending programmes and to direct at least 20% of the Union budget to climate-related objectives. It is important to ensure that climate change mitigation and adaptation as well as risk prevention and management are promoted in the preparation, design and implementation of projects of common
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The Commission has committed to mainstream climate change into Union spending programmes and to direct at least 20% of the Union budget to climate-related objectives. It is important to ensure that climate change mitigation and adaptation as well as risk prevention and management are promoted in the preparation, design and implementation of projects of common interest and that priority is therefore given to electricity interconnection investments. Infrastructure investments covered by this Regulation should contribute to promoting the transition to a low-carbon and climate- and disaster-resilient economy and society and minimise support for long-term high- carbon projects which lock in fossil fuels into our energy system for several decades and undermine the EU's 2020 and 2050 climate targets.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) On 28 March 2011, the Commission adopted the White Paper ''A Roadmap to a Single Transport Area ― Towards a competitive and resource-efficient transport system''. The White Paper aims at reduc
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) On 28 March 2011, the Commission adopted the White Paper ''A Roadmap to a Single Transport Area ― Towards a competitive and resource-efficient transport system''. The White Paper aims at reducting by at least 60% the greenhouse gas emissions (''GHG'') of the transport sector by 2050 with respect to 1990.As far as infrastructure is concerned, the White Paper aims at establishing a fully functional and Union-wide multimodal TEN-T ‘core network’ by 2030.The White Paper also aims at uniformly developing a European transport area, optimising the performance of multimodal logistic chains, including by making greater use of more energy-efficient modes. Therefore, it sets the following relevant targets for TEN-T policy: 30% of road freight over 300 km should shift to other modes by 2030, and more than 50% by 2050; the length of the existing high-speed rail network should triple by 2030 and by 2050 the majority of medium-distance passenger transport should go by rail; by 2050, all core network airports should be connected to the rail network; all seaports to the rail freight and
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) On 28 March 2011, the Commission adopted the White Paper "A Roadmap to a Single Transport Area ― Towards a competitive and resource-efficient transport system".
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) On 28 March 2011, the Commission adopted the White Paper "A Roadmap to a Single Transport Area ― Towards a competitive and resource-efficient transport system". The White Paper aims at reducting by at least 60% the greenhouse gas emissions (
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7 a) The Union shall aim at minimising and internalising all external costs and apply the 'polluter pays' principle enshrined in Article 191 of the Treaty of the European Union.
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 a (new) (7a) If the shift to rail is to be encouraged, a greater degree of acceptance on the part of people affected by rail noise and a reduction in noise pollution levels, in particular in rail freight corridors, are essential.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The European Parliament in its Resolution of 6 July 2010 on a sustainable future for transport emphasised that an
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) The previous Multiannual Financial Framework (2007-2013) showed that a limited budget for the TEN-T prevents progress being made on the biggest projects, particularly cross-border projects. An adequate European budgetary framework for the TEN-T would not only make it more attractive to private investment, but also ensure a greater national political will with regard to European projects, and therefore better cooperation between the Member States involved in a cross-border project. The European Union should be more ambitious about major European infrastructure projects, whose complexity and scale mean that the budget allocated to them should be revised upwards and the budgetary rules applying to them should be adapted. The new TEN-T guidelines should be given the budgetary and regulatory means necessary for their achievement.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) On the basis of the objectives set by the White Paper, the TEN-T guidelines as laid down in Regulation (EU) No XXX/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of … identify the infrastructure of the trans-European transport network, specify the requirements to be fulfilled by it and provide for measures for their implementation. The Guidelines envisage in particular the completion of the core network by 2030 through the creation of new infrastructure as well as the rehabilitation and upgrading of existing infrastructure.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) On the basis of the objectives set by the White Paper, the TEN-T guidelines as
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Based on an analysis of the transport infrastructure plans of Member States, the Commission estimates that investment needs in transport amount to EUR 500 billion in the entirety of the TEN-T network for the period 2014-2020, of which an estimated EUR 250 billion will need to be invested in the core network of the TEN-T.
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Based on an analysis of the transport infrastructure plans of Member States, the Commission estimates that investment needs in transport amount to EUR 500 billion in the entirety of the TEN-T network for the period 2014-2020, of which an estimated EUR 250 billion will need to be invested in the core network of the TEN-T. Given the resources available at Union level, concentration on the projects with the highest European added value is necessary to achieve the desired impact. Support should therefore be focussed on the core network (in particular, the core network corridors), without excluding support for the comprehensive network, and on the projects of common interest in the field of traffic management systems (notably the air traffic management systems resulting from SESAR which require Union budgetary resources of about EUR 3 billion).
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) Based on an analysis of the transport infrastructure plans of Member States, the Commission estimates that investment needs in transport amount to EUR 500 billion in the entirety of the TEN-T network for the period 2014-2020, of which an estimated EUR 250 billion will need to be invested in the core network of the TEN-T. Given the resources available at Union level, concentration on the projects with the highest European added value is necessary to achieve the desired impact. Support should therefore be focussed on the core network (in particular, the core network corridors) and on the projects of common interest such as multimodal transport hubs and in the field of and traffic management systems (notably the air traffic management systems resulting from SESAR which require Union budgetary resources of about EUR 3 billion).
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11a) In its communication ‘The outermost regions of the European Union: towards a partnership for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’, of 20 June 2012, the Commission emphasises the specific characteristics of the outermost regions, as recognised in Articles 349 and 355 of the TFEU, and contemplates their inclusion in relevant specific projects of common interest in the fields of transport, telecommunications and energy, to assist their integration into the internal market and promote their economic development. To this end, they should receive Commission support in drawing up a portfolio of specific projects.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 a (new) (11 a) In order to create European added value, the Union should focus its efforts and concentrate its resources on cross- border sections that have been abandoned or cut since the end of the Second World War. Priority should be given to the upgrading or rehabilitation of existing infrastructure.
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR 10 billion) should be transferred to finance transport projects on the transport core network in the Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects,
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR 10 billion) should be transferred to finance transport projects on the transport core network or related to horizontal priorities in the Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund under the Connecting Europe Facility. In a first phase, the selection of projects eligible for financing should respect the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund. The Commission should support Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund to develop an adequate pipeline of projects, in
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value, which frequently results in inefficient use of European funds. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR 10 billion) should be transferred to finance transport projects on the transport core network in the Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund under the Connecting Europe Facility. The Commission should support Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund to develop an adequate pipeline of projects in order to give greatest possible priority to the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR 10 billion) should be transferred to finance transport projects on the transport core network in the Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund under the Connecting Europe Facility. The Commission should support Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund to develop an adequate pipeline of projects in order to give greatest possible priority to the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund. The Commission should ensure that no distortion of the national allocations is possible. The Commission should at the same time provide necessary coordination and assistance to the eligible Member States in order to remove administrative and bureaucratic barriers and ensure transparent process of selection of the projects.
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR 10 billion) should be transferred to finance transport projects on the transport core network (and in particular the core network corridors) in the Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund under the Connecting Europe Facility. The Cohesion Fund allocation of each Member State under the Connecting Europe Facility shall respect national envelopes, but after the mid-term review, funding not committed by the Member State concerned shall be made available to all Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund. The Commission should support Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund to develop an adequate pipeline of projects in order to give greatest possible priority to the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In the Communication on ‘Energy infrastructure priorities for 2020 and beyond – a Blueprint for an integrated energy network’ adopted in November 2010, the Commission identified the priority corridors, which are necessary to allow the Union to meet its ambitious energy and climate targets by 2020 for completing the internal energy market, ensuring security of supply, enabling the integration of renewable sources of energy and to prepare the networks for further decarbonisation of the energy system beyond 2020. It recalls, in particular, the importance of improving the electricity and gas interconnection capacity between Iberian peninsula and France.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) In the Communication on ‘Energy infrastructure priorities for 2020 and beyond – a Blueprint for an integrated energy network’ adopted in November 2010, the Commission identified the priority corridors, which are necessary to allow the Union to meet its ambitious energy and climate targets by 2020 for completing the internal energy market, ensuring security of supply, enabling the integration of renewable sources of energy and to prepare the
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Major investments are needed to modernise and expand Europe's energy infrastructure and to interconnect networks across borders to meet the Union's energy and climate policy objectives of competitiveness, sustainability and security of supply in a cost-effective way, notably by eliminating the remaining energy islands in Europe. The estimated investment needs in energy infrastructure up to 2020 amount to EUR 1 trillion, of which ca. EUR 200 billion in electricity and gas transmission and storage
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Major investments are needed to modernise and expand Europe's energy infrastructure and to interconnect networks across borders to meet the Union's energy and climate policy objectives of competitiveness, sustainability and security of supply in a cost-effective way. The estimated investment needs in energy infrastructure up to 2020 amount to EUR 1 trillion, of which ca. EUR 200 billion in electricity and gas transmission and storage infrastructures considered of European relevance. Among projects of European relevance, approximately EUR 100 billion of investments is at risk of not being delivered due to obstacles related to permit granting, regulation and financing according to the Commission Staff Working Paper to the Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council of 10 June 2011 "Energy infrastructure investment needs and financing requirements".
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Major investments are needed to
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Major investments are needed to modernise and expand Europe's energy infrastructure and to interconnect networks across borders, putting an end to the existence of energy islands, in order to meet the Union's energy and climate policy objectives of competitiveness, sustainability and security of supply in a cost-effective way. The estimated investment needs in energy infrastructure up to 2020 amount to EUR 1 trillion, of which ca. EUR 200 billion in electricity and gas transmission and storage infrastructures considered of European relevance. Among projects of European relevance, approximately EUR 100 billion of investments is at risk of not being delivered due to obstacles related to permit granting, regulation and financing.
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Major investments are needed to modernise and expand Europe's energy infrastructure and to interconnect networks across borders to meet the Union's energy and climate policy objectives of competitiveness, sustainability and security of supply in a cost-effective way. Long- distance electricity highways will help significantly to overcome the variability of renewable sources of electricity by sharing and distributing those resources throughout the Union. The estimated investment needs in energy infrastructure up to 2020 amount to EUR 1 trillion, of which ca. EUR 200 billion in electricity and gas transmission and storage infrastructures considered of European
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 a (new) (16a) In its communication of 8 March 2011 entitled ‘A Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050’, the Commission emphasised the central role to be played by energy infrastructure in meeting the target of an 85% reduction in CO2 emissions by 2050.
Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The 4 February 2011 European Council called upon the Commission to streamline, simplify, speed up and improve authorisation procedures and to promote a regulatory framework attractive to investment. The
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The 4 February 2011 European Council called upon the Commission to streamline and improve authorisation procedures and to promote a regulatory framework attractive to investment. The European Council underlined that the bulk of the investment would have to be delivered by the market with costs recovered through tariffs. The European Council recognised that public finance was needed for projects required from a security of supply or solidarity perspective, which were unable to attract market based financing. It also underlined the need to modernise and expand Europe's energy infrastructure and to interconnect networks across borders, in order to make solidarity between Member States operational, to provide for alternative supply or transit routes and sources of energy and develop renewable energy sources in competition with traditional sources.
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 a (new) (18 a) Recalls that the European Parliament in its report on trade and climate change of 24 October 2007 (2007/2003(INI)) stressed the need to remove fossil fuel subsidies; reminds that the Europe 2020 strategy calls for the phasing out of environmentally harmful subsidies; highlights that the European Commission's Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe stresses the negative effects of fossil fuels and environmentally harmful subsidies and that the 2012 Annual Growth Survey of the European Semester called for the elimination of environmentally harmful subsidies; considers therefore that it would be appropriate to limit the proportion of resources devoted to energy infrastructure in the Connecting Europe Facility that act as direct or indirect subsidies to fossil fuels;
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 a (new) (18 a) An earmarking of funds for electricity infrastructure of at least 75% of the total amount for energy within the Connecting Europe Facility should be applied in order to properly reflect the different energy infrastructure investment needs; in its report to the June 2011 Energy Council, the Commission estimated a total of EUR 200 billion of investment needs in energy infrastructure of European importance up to 2020, of which EUR 140 billion is needed for high voltage electricity transmission systems, and EUR 70 billion for gas transmission pipelines.
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Telecommunications are increasingly becoming internet-based infrastructures, with broadband networks and digital services closely interrelated. The internet is becoming the dominant platform for communication, offering innovative services, and doing business. Therefore the trans-
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Telecommunications are increasingly becoming internet-based infrastructures, with broadband networks and digital services closely interrelated. Furthermore, cloud computing and software-as-a- service emerge as the new paradigms of computing. The internet is becoming the dominant platform for communication, offering private and public services,
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Telecommunications are increasingly becoming internet-based infrastructures, with broadband networks
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Telecommunications are increasingly becoming internet-based infrastructures, with broadband networks
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Modern, fibre-based internet networks are a crucial infrastructure for the future in terms of connectivity for European companies, in particular SMEs that want to
Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Modern, fibre-based internet networks are a crucial infrastructure for the future in terms of connectivity for European companies, in particular SMEs that want to use cloud computing in order to improve cost-efficiency. In order to avoid duplication of infrastructure, prevent the displacement of private investment and enhance capacity building to create new investment opportunities and to promote the implementation of cost reduction measures, actions should be taken to improve coordination of EU support to broadband from CEF and broadband support from all other available sources, including through national broadband plans.
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) Modern, f
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The Europe 2020 Strategy calls for the implementation of the Digital Agenda for Europe that establishes a stable legal framework to stimulate investments in an open and competitive high speed internet infrastructure and in related services. The June 2010 European Council endorsed the Digital Agenda for Europe and called upon all institutions to engage in its full implementation. The Digital Agenda for Europe sets the target of having 30 Mbps high-speed broadband for all households by 2020, with 50% of households having 100 Mbps high-speed connections.
Amendment 170 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The Europe 2020 Strategy calls for the implementation of the Digital Agenda for Europe that establishes a stable legal framework to stimulate investments in an open and competitive high speed internet infrastructure and in related services.
Amendment 171 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The Europe 2020 Strategy calls for the implementation of the Digital Agenda for Europe that establishes a stable legal framework to stimulate investments in an open and competitive high speed internet infrastructure and in related services that will form the basis of the Digital Single Market. The June 2010 European Council endorsed the Digital Agenda for Europe and called upon all institutions to engage in its full implementation.
Amendment 172 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 a (new) (21 a) In order to ensure competitiveness of the European Union and to facilitate the growth of a European world leading service economy, the current Digital Agenda Targets should be achieved by 2015 instead of 2020.
Amendment 173 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 (22) On 31 May 2010, the Council concluded that Europe should put the necessary resources into the development of a digital single market based on fast and ultra fast internet and interoperable applications and acknowledged that efficient and competitive investment in next generation broadband networks would be
Amendment 174 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 a (new) (22 a) In its Resolution of the 5th of May 2010, the European Parliament called for both open source investments as well as particular attention targeting the construction of Gbps networks for European research institutions and universities, and the affordable access to ultrafast connections by small and medium-sized enterprises;
Amendment 175 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23 a) Public investments in fast and ultra-fast broadband networks must not unduly distort competition nor create disincentives to invest. It should be used to crowd in private investments and only in cases where there is a lack of commercial interest to invest.
Amendment 176 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23 a) Most research available clearly illustrates the substantial increased benefits that accrue from investments in ICT infrastructure to generate jobs and growth in both the long and short term, not just from the construction of the infrastructure itself but also from the immediate, strong and durable multiplier effect of enhanced digital capability throughout the economy, especially for small businesses; urges that every effort should be made not only to clarify amounts available in the Union Budget but to do everything to ensure that existing funds be shaped towards ICT take up;
Amendment 177 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) It is necessary to develop strong and coherent EU-wide networks for the digital delivery of public-good actions, involving both public and civil society actors at national and regional level, and to this end it is essential to ensure the structured EU financing of the costs of the system and software design, as well as maintenance of a resilient hub for such networks, leaving only in-country costs for national operator budgets. Particular priority should be given to ensuring that all publicly financed systems and software designs get disseminated in the form of open, accessible standards which are easily obtained and used by all society actors, including not-for-profit actors, and that code resulting from public investments is always made available as open source to the public;
Amendment 178 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) It is necessary to develop strong and coherent EU-wide networks for the digital delivery of public-good actions, involving both public and civil society actors at national and regional level, and to this end it is essential to ensure the structured EU financing of the costs of the system and software design, as well as maintenance of a resilient hub for such networks, leaving only in-country costs for national operator budgets. In order to complete the Digital Single Market, close cooperation and coordination of activities under the CEF programme with the national and regional broadband actions shall be ensured.
Amendment 179 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) It is necessary to develop strong and coherent EU-wide networks for the digital delivery of public-good actions, involving both public and civil society actors at national and regional level, and to this end it is essential to ensure the structured EU financing of the costs of the system and software design, as well as the cybersecurity and maintenance of a resilient hub for such networks, leaving only in-country costs for national operator budgets.
Amendment 180 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26 a) In the application of financial instruments for the aim of creating trans- European core services, particular priority should be given to ensuring services being based on open, accessible standards which are easily reviewed, obtained and used by all society actors and where the standard development process is open, transparent and inclusive for as many stakeholders as are interested, including not-for-profit actors, and that source code resulting from public investments in core service applications is always made openly available to the public;
Amendment 181 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Ensuring cross-border interoperability in the deployment of large scale infrastructure projects, in particular at the level of core services, may require simultaneous procurement and installation of equipment by the Commission, Member State and/or their beneficiaries. To facilitate the fulfilment of the interoperability requirement, preference should be given to solutions implementing open, transparent standards provided on royalty-free basis. In such cases, Union financial aid may need to be allocated to procurements executed by infrastructure providers in Member States, either on their own behalf or in cooperation with the Commission. Provisions also enable multiple sourcing, which may be needed, inter alia, to provide for multi-
Amendment 182 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) Ensuring cross-border interoperability in the deployment of large scale infrastructure projects, in particular at the level of core services, may require simultaneous procurement and installation of equipment by the Commission, Member State, region, local authority and/or their beneficiaries. In such cases, Union financial aid may need to be allocated to procurements executed by infrastructure providers in Member States or regions with devolved powers, either on their own behalf or in cooperation with the Commission. Provisions also enable multiple sourcing, which may be needed, inter alia, to provide for multi-
Amendment 183 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) Generic services in areas of public interest (as core services) are often affected by a strong degree of market failures. Indeed, the areas to be funded relate to public service delivery (eHealth, eIdentity, eProcurement large scale deployment and interoperability) hence not commercial by definition at a starting level. In addition, if only core services are funded, the
Amendment 184 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) Generic services in areas of public interest (as core services) are often affected by a strong degree of market failures. Indeed, the areas to be funded relate to public service delivery (eHealth, eIdentity, eProcurement, eLearning large scale deployment and interoperability) hence not commercial by definition at a starting level. In addition, if only core services are funded, the
Amendment 185 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) Generic services in areas of public interest (as core services) are often affected by a strong degree of market failures. Indeed, the areas to be funded relate to public service delivery (eHealth, eIdentity, eProcurement large scale deployment and interoperability and the digitisation of European cultural collections) hence not commercial by definition at a starting level. In addition, if only core services are funded, the challenge would be to create the right incentives at Member State and regional level to actually deploy services of public interest: this is due particularly to lack of incentive at national level to link national systems to the core systems (hence develop conditions for interoperability and cross-
Amendment 186 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) Generic services in areas of public interest (as core services) are often affected by a strong degree of market failures. Indeed, the areas to be funded relate to public service delivery (eHealth, eIdentity, eProcurement large scale deployment and interoperability) hence not commercial by definition at a starting level. In addition, if only core services are funded, the challenge would be to create the right incentives at Member State and regional level to actually deploy services of public interest: this is due particularly to lack of incentive at national level to link national systems to the core systems (hence develop conditions for interoperability and cross- border services) as well as to the fact that private investors would not alone ensure service deployment within interoperable frameworks. Projects of common interest relating to cross-border delivery of eGovernment services should take into account the 25 recommendations of the European Interoperability Framework for European public services (EIF) that address specific interoperability requirements.
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 (28) Generic services in areas of public interest (as core services) are often affected by a strong degree of market failures. Indeed, the areas to be funded relate to public service delivery (eHealth, eIdentity, eGovernment, eLearning, eProcurement large scale deployment and interoperability) hence not commercial by definition at a starting level. In addition, if only core services are funded, the challenge would be to create the right incentives at Member State and regional level to actually deploy services of public interest: this is due particularly to lack of incentive at national level to link national systems to the core systems (hence develop conditions for interoperability and cross- border services) as well as to the fact that private investors would not alone ensure service deployment within interoperable frameworks.
Amendment 188 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 29 a (new) (29 a) The deployment of cross border services by the establishment of electronic procedures for moving from one European country to another will allow dealing electronically with all necessary administrative procedures, facilitating the mobility of Europeans while making it less costly. Consequently, these services have the potential of changing in a positive manner the ease with which Europeans can work, study and reside in any Member State, through Points of Single Contact for registration of change of address with all public authorities in the target country (local authority, school, doctor, police, etc.) with the source country electronic identity.
Amendment 189 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) Horizon 2020 – the future Framework Programme for Research and Innovation will focus among others on tackling societal challenges (e.g. smart, green, accessible and integrated transport, and secure, clean and efficient energy, and information and communication technology-enabled health, government and sustainable development) in order to respond directly to the challenges identified in the Europe 2020 Strategy by supporting activities covering the entire spectrum from research to market. Horizon 2020 will support all stages in the innovation chain, especially activities closer to the market including innovative financial instruments. With the aim to achieve a greater impact of the Union funding and in order to ensure coherence, the Connecting Europe Facility will develop close synergies with Horizon 2020.
Amendment 190 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) Horizon 2020 – the future Framework Programme for Research and Innovation will focus among others on tackling societal challenges (e.g. smart, green and integrated transport, and secure, clean and efficient energy, and information and communication technology-enabled health, government and sustainable development) in order to respond directly to the challenges identified in the Europe 2020 Strategy by supporting activities covering the entire spectrum from research to market. Horizon 2020 will support all stages in the innovation chain, especially activities closer to the market including innovative financial instruments. Furthermore, the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) pursues the same objectives in tackling those societal challenges, focusing on the exploitation of research results and the development innovative products and services. With the aim to achieve a greater impact of the Union funding and in order to ensure coherence, the Connecting Europe Facility will develop close synergies with Horizon 2020 and the EIT.
Amendment 191 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 (33) Fiscal measures in many Member States will drive or have already driven public authorities to reassess their infrastructure investment programmes
Amendment 192 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 (33) Fiscal measures in many Member States or regions with devolved powers will drive or have already driven public authorities to reassess their infrastructure investment programmes. In this context, PPPs have been viewed as an effective means of delivering infrastructure projects ensuring the achievement of policy
Amendment 193 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) Even though the bulk of the investment under Europe 2020 Strategy can be delivered by
Amendment 194 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 a (new) (34 a) In order to ensure equality between, on the one hand, transport projects that already apply the 'user pays' principle on a mandatory basis and, on the other hand, those that do not levy charges on users, the Union should also provide financing through grants for transport projects that generate income.
Amendment 195 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 a (new) (34 a) Fiscal measures in Member States should drive public authorities to promote renewable energy sources as well as energy efficiency and resource efficiency.
Amendment 196 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 a (new) (34 a) To optimise utilisation of the EU budget in the form of grants, these should be reserved for projects that generate little or no income, with the exception of transport projects which collect infrastructure charges.
Amendment 197 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 a (new) Amendment 198 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 (35) The EU Budget Review34 emphasised that the norm for projects with long-term commercial potential should be the use of Union funds in partnership with the financial and banking sectors, particularly the European Investment Bank (
Amendment 199 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 (35) The EU Budget Review emphasised that the norm for projects with long-term commercial potential should be the use of Union funds in partnership with the financial and banking sectors, particularly
Amendment 200 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) In the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Commission pledged to mobilise Union financial instruments as part of a consistent funding strategy, that pulls together Union and national public and private funding for infrastructures. This is based on the rationale that
Amendment 201 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) In the Europe 2020 Strategy, the Commission pledged to mobilise Union financial instruments
Amendment 202 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 a (new) (37 a) Those innovative financial instruments, such as project bonds, can give a boost to the financing of transport infrastructure with European added value. Their use should therefore be strongly encouraged, in order to use the European budget in the most efficient way.
Amendment 203 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 (38) Wh
Amendment 204 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 (38) While most financial instruments should be common for all sectors, some may be specific for individual sectors. Commission services estimate that while the financial support for broadband networks would primarily rely on financial instruments, for transport and energy the volume of Union budgetary resources required for financial instruments should not exceed EUR 2 billion and EUR 1 billion respectively.
Amendment 205 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 (38)
Amendment 206 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 a (new) (38a) Moreover, in the field of road transport and in order to increase the financial liability of projects' promoters - thus fulfilling the criteria requested by EIB to apply for financial instruments that require a sound financial standing able to create an efficient and well- functioning market- actions aimed at unifying existing concessions along the TEN-T network should be considered.
Amendment 207 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) In order to ensure sectorial diversification of beneficiaries of financial instruments as well as encourage
Amendment 208 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) In order to ensure sect
Amendment 209 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40) With respect to the conditions for the financial instruments, it might be necessary to add additional requirements in the Work Programmes, for example to ensure a competitive and fair internal market
Amendment 210 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 41 (41) Multi-annual programming for support from the Facility should be directed towards supporting the Union's priorities by ensuring the availability of the necessary financial resources and the consistency, fairness and continuity of joint action by the Union and the Member States. For proposals submitted following the implementation of the first multiannual work programme in the sector of transport, eligibility of cost should start on 1 January 2014 to ensure the continuity of projects already covered by Regulation (EC) No 680/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2007 laying down general rules for the granting of Community financial aid in the field of the trans-European transport and energy networks.
Amendment 211 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 41 (41) Multi-annual programming for support from the Facility should be directed towards supporting the Union's priorities by ensuring the availability of the necessary financial resources and the consistency, transparency and continuity of joint action by the Union and the Member States. For proposals submitted following the
Amendment 212 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 a (new) Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) Mid-term and ex-post evaluations should be carried out by the Commission in order to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the funding and its impact on the overall goals of the Facility and the Europe 2020 Strategy's priorities. These evaluations should be communicated to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
Amendment 214 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) Mid-term and ex-post evaluations should be carried out by the Commission and the European Parliament notified of the results in order to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the funding and its impact on the overall goals of the Facility and the Europe 2020 Strategy's priorities.
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) Mid-term and ex-post evaluations sh
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) Mid-term and ex-post evaluations should be carried out by the Commission in order to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the funding and its impact on the overall goals of the Facility and the Europe 2020 Strategy's priorities. The Commission shall publish annually a scoreboard depicting the progress of all projects selected under the CEF.
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 a (new) (43 a) These evaluations should include assessments on the capacity of the Member States or concerned implementing bodies to comply with their own co-financing engagements in completion of the EU grants or of the innovative financial instruments provided to carry out a project of common interest.
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 (44) On the basis of the sector specific guidelines laid down in separate Regulations, a list of priority areas for which this Regulation should apply has been drawn up and should be included in the Annex. In order to take into account possible changes in political priorities and technological capabilities, as well as traffic flows, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of adopting amendments to the Annex. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level. The Commission,
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 (44) On the basis of the sector specific guidelines laid down in separate Regulations, a list of priority areas for which this Regulation should apply has been drawn up and should be included in the Annex. In order to take into account possible changes in political priorities and technological capabilities, as well as traffic flows, the power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of adopting amendments to the Annex. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work with all competent bodies and local, regional and State authorities, including at expert level. The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament and to the Council.
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 (47) The financial interests of the Union should be protected through proportionate measures throughout the expenditure cycle, including the prevention, detection and investigation of irregularities, the recovery of funds lost, wrongly paid or incorrectly used and, where appropriate, penalties. Parliament should be kept informed about all such information, at all stages and with full transparency.
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 a (new) (47a) The form of the contract must be consistent with the basis for and the circumstances of the project and guarantee broad and fair competition for projects co-funded under the CEF which are the subject of public procurement procedures. In order to secure the most economically advantageous price and ensure that the project is carried out as efficiently as possible, the basic terms of the contract should be fair and reflect the risks associated with the project, irrespective of national or international standards.
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 a (new) (47a) In order to guarantee broad and fair competition for projects funded under the CEF, the form of the contract must be consistent with the aims and circumstances of the project. The terms of the contract must be drafted in such a way as to spread the risks associated with the work to be carried out fairly, in order to maximise cost-effectiveness and ensure that the work is performed as efficiently as possible. This principle shall apply irrespective of whether a national or international contract model is employed.
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 a (new) (47 a) In order to ensure broad and fair competition for projects benefitting from CEF funds, tenders must be based on fair and transparent contract conditions and the form of contract used must be appropriate to the project's objectives and circumstances.
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Some of the infrastructure projects of Union interest might need to link with and pass through neighbourhood, pre-accession and other third countries. The Connecting Europe Facility
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Some of the infrastructure projects of Union interest might need to link with and pass through neighbourhood, pre-accession and other third countries. The Connecting Europe Facility should offer simplified means of linking and financing these infrastructures, in order to ensure coherence between internal and external instruments of the Union budget. In the transport sector, special attention should be paid to strengthening the links between the trans-European and trans- Mediterranean transport networks, particularly in order to facilitate the transport of goods via the motorways of the sea. In the energy sector, emphasis should be placed on completing the Mediterranean electric ring and developing direct undersea electricity interconnections between the EU and the countries of the South-East Mediterranean in order to structure the complementarity of the two energy systems.
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Some of the infrastructure projects of Union interest might need to link with and pass through neighbourhood, pre-accession and other third countries such as in the Southern and Eastern Mediterranean, which has substantial solar energy that could be imported into the EU via long- distance electricity connections. The Connecting Europe Facility should offer simplified means of linking and financing these infrastructures, in order to ensure
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 a (new) (48a) The participation of undertakings established in third countries is a prerequisite for achieving the objectives of the Connecting Europe Facility, in view of the experience and technical know-how which they can bring to the projects. Particular attention must, however, be drawn to the need for such undertakings to comply with labour, social and environmental law. This is a growing demand from European society. The Commission should therefore be given the means to carry out this task, with a view to promoting fair competition between European undertakings and third countries.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 b (new) (48b) Participation in Union-financed projects by undertakings established in third countries must be matched by a requirement for reciprocity in trade relations. Therefore European undertakings must have access to similar opportunities in the third countries concerned.
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation establishes the Connecting Europe Facility and determines the conditions, methods and procedures for providing Union financial aid to trans- European networks in order to support projects in the field of transport, energy and telecommunications infrastructures and in sectors between which synergies may be created.
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 1 This Regulation establishes the Connecting
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) ‘cross-border section’ means the section
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2) ‘cross-border section’ means the
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2 (2)
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (5) ‘programme support actions’ means all accompanying measures necessary for the implementation of the Connecting Europe Facility and individual sector specific guidelines, such as services (notably technical assistance), as well as preparatory, feasibility, coordination, monitoring, consultation of interested parties and stakeholders, control, audit and evaluation activities which are required directly for the management of this facility and the achievement of its objectives, and in particular studies, meetings, information, infrastructure mapping, twinning, dissemination, awareness raising and
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 5 (5) ‘programme support actions’ means accompanying measures necessary for the implementation of the Connecting Europe Facility and individual sector specific guidelines, such as services (notably technical assistance), as well as preparatory, feasibility, coordination, monitoring, control, audit and evaluation activities as well as Environmental Impact Assessments and Strategic Environmental Assessments which are required directly for the management of this facility and the achievement of its objectives, and in particular studies, meetings, information, infrastructure mapping, twinning, dissemination, awareness raising and communication actions, expenses linked to IT networks focusing on information exchange, together with all other technical and administrative assistance expenses that may be required for the management of this facility or implementation of the
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6 a (new) (6 a) 'consultation procedure' means appropriate and adequate procedure including the respect of the Aarhus Convention as granted by Directive 2003/4, by which, prior the adoption of a project of common interest, all concerned interested parties are consulted according to the existing national rules and laws to express their concerns and suggestions to the captioned project. Such consultation complies with the requirements as set in the provisions of Directive 85/337 and 2001/42.
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘bottleneck’ means a physical barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of long-distance flows. Such a barrier can be absorbed by new infrastructure such as bridges or tunnels that address problems as for example gradients, curve radii, gauge.
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘bottleneck’ means a physical barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of long-distance flows. Such a barrier can be absorbed by creating new infrastructure or substantially modernising existing infrastructure in order to increase its capacity such as bridges or tunnels that address problems as for example gradients, curve radii, gauge.
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘bottleneck’
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12)
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘bottleneck’ means a physical barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of long-distance flows. Such a barrier can be absorbed by new infrastructure such as bridges, locks, groynes, bottom sills or tunnels that address problems as for example gradients, curve radii,
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘bottleneck’ means a physical barrier
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) "bottleneck" in the transport sector means a physical or technical barrier that leads to a system break or obstruction affecting the continuity of long-distance and cross-border flows. Such a barrier can be absorbed by constructing new infrastructure or substantially upgrading existing infrastructure to improve its capacity, such as bridges or tunnels that address problems as for example gradients, curve radii, gauge.
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘bottleneck’ means a physical barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of long-distance flows. Such a barrier can be absorbed both by new infrastructure such as bridges or tunnels that address problems as for example gradients, curve radii, gauge
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘bottleneck’ means a physical
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) "bottleneck" means a physical barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of long-distance flows. Such a barrier can be absorbed by new infrastructure such as bridges or tunnels or by adapted infrastructure such as bypasses that address problems as for example gradients, curve radii, gauge. The need to upgrade existing infrastructure shall not be considered as a bottleneck;
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12)
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘transport bottleneck’ means a physical barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) "transport bottleneck" means a physical and/or functional barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of long-distance flows
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘bottleneck’ means a physical and/or functional barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of long- distance flows. Such a barrier can be absorbed by new infrastructure and/or by revitalisation of the existing infrastructure such as bridges or tunnels that address problems as for example gradients, curve radii, gauge.
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) "bottleneck" means a physical and/or functional barrier that leads to a system break affecting the
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12)
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12)
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘bottleneck’ means a physical barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of long-distance flows. Such a barrier can be absorbed by new infrastructure such as bridges or tunnels that address problems as for example gradients, curve radii, gauge. The need to upgrade existing infrastructure shall not be considered as a bottleneck; in the field of energy, lack of capacity of interconnection due either to absence of infrastructure or to limited physical flow or faltering system management;
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (12) ‘bottleneck’ means a physical and/or functional barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of long- distance flows. Such a barrier can be absorbed by new infrastructure
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (13)
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 (13) "bottleneck" means a physical and/or functional barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of long- distance flows. Such a
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20 a (new) (20 a) 'isolated network' means the rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, as defined by Article 3 (qq) of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T guidelines]
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – introductory part The Connecting Europe Facility shall enable the preparation and implementation of projects of common interest within the framework of the trans-European networks policy in the sectors of energy, transport
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks, thus bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of competitiveness and economic, social and territorial cohesion within the Single Market and creating an environment more conducive to private and public investment through a combination of financial instruments and Union direct support and by exploiting synergies across the sectors. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the volume of public and private investment in projects of common interest, and in particular the volume of public and private investments in projects of common interest realised through the financial instruments under this Regulation. This objective should particularly focus on regions with natural and demographic disadvantages, such as the outermost regions.
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks, thus bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of competitiveness and economic, social and territorial cohesion within the Single Market and creating an environment more conducive to private and public investment through a combination of financial instruments and Union direct support and by exploiting synergies across the sectors. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks, thus bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of competitiveness and economic, social and territorial cohesion within the Single Market and creating an environment more conducive to private and public investment through a combination of financial instruments and Union direct support and by exploiting synergies across the sectors. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the volume of public and private investment in projects of common interest, and in particular the volume of public and private investments in projects of common interest realised through the financial instruments under this Regulation.
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks, thus bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks which take account of future traffic flows, thus bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of competitiveness and economic, social and territorial cohesion within the Single Market and creating an environment more conducive to private and public investment through a combination of financial instruments and Union direct support and by exploiting synergies across the sectors. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the volume of public and private investment in projects of common interest, and in particular the volume of public and private investments in projects of common interest realised through the financial instruments under this Regulation.
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks, thus bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of competitiveness and economic, social and
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) contribute to smart, sustainable and inclusive growth by developing modern and high performing trans-European networks, thus bringing forward benefits for the entire European Union in terms of competitiveness and economic, social and territorial cohesion within the Single Market and creating an environment more conducive to private
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) enable the Union to achieve its targets of a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, a 20% increase in energy efficiency and raising the share of renewable energy to 20% up to 2020, while ensuring greater solidarity among Member States. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the share in the European targets achieved through projects under this Regulation.
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) enable the Union to achieve its
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) enable the Union to achieve
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) enable the Union to achieve its targets of a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, a 20% increase in energy efficiency and raising the share of renewable energy to 20% up to 2020, while ensuring greater solidarity among Member States, in investing into energy efficiency, renewable energy and smart transmission and distribution electricity networks.
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) enable the Union to achieve its targets of a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, a 20% increase in energy efficiency and raising the share of renewable energy to 20% up to 2020, and contribute to achieving the 2050 objectives, while ensuring greater solidarity among Member States.
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) enable the Union to achieve its targets of a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, a 20% increase in energy efficiency and raising the share of renewable energy to 20% up to 2020, while ensuring greater solidarity among Member States. The methodology established for ex post evaluation of the instrument’s efficiency and effectiveness shall include consultations between Member States.
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) enable the Union to achieve its targets of a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, a 20% increase in energy efficiency and raising the share of renewable energy to 20% up to 2020, while ensuring greater solidarity among Member States. Alongside these targets, due account must be taken of the long-term decarbonisation targets laid down in the Roadmap for moving to a low carbon economy in 2050.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) enable the Union to achieve its targets of a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, a 20% increase in energy efficiency and raising the share of renewable energy to 20% up to 2020, while ensuring greater solidarity among Member States in moving to specific milestones for domestic emission reductions of 40%, 60% and 80% for 2030, 2040 and 2050 respectively.
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) enable the Union to achieve the goal of security of energy supply, including through diversification.
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) ensure the development of infrastructure which respects the environment as a whole, in accordance with ex ante studies as defined in Article 3ra of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines], taking into account the overall impact of the projects on biodiversity, water pollution and soil pollution.
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b – footnote b. enable the Union to achieve its targets of a 20% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions1, a 20% increase in energy efficiency and raising the share of renewable energy to 20% up to 2020, while ensuring greater solidarity among Member States. 1 If the conditions are right, up to 30´%. If the conditions set out by the European Council are met, up to 30´%.
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1.
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (i) removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links, to be measured by the number of new and improved cross-border connections and removed bottlenecks on all modes transport routes which have benefited from
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (i) removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links also by means of innovative ITS, to be measured by the number of
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (i) removing bottlenecks and bridging missing links, to be measured by the number of new and improved internal and cross-border connections and removed bottlenecks on transport routes which have benefited from
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (i) removing bottlenecks
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point i (i) removing bottlenecks
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run, to be measured by the length of the conventional railway, road and IWW networks in the EU-27
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run, to be measured by the length of the
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run, to be measured by the length of the
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run, to be measured by the length of the conventional railway network in the EU-27 and the length of high-speed railway network in the EU-27; and ensuring that the length of the roads of the core network has adequate coverage in terms of infrastructure to supply alternative fuels to vehicles using these roads in the EU-27 and the reduction in casualties on the road network in the EU-27;
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport systems in the long run
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run, to be measured by the length of the conventional railway network in the EU-27 and the length of high-speed railway
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the short and long run, to be measured by the
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run, to be measured by the length of the conventional railway network in the EU-27
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport in the long run, to be measured by
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii (ii) ensuring sustainable and efficient transport systems in the long run
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point ii a (new) (iia) eliminating disparities between transport infrastructures and systems in the Member States. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the motorway and expressway network, the length of the conventional and high-speed railway network and the number of new or modernised maritime and inland waterway ports in the Member States which joined on 1 May 2004;
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii (iii) optimise the integration and interconnection of transport modes and enhancing interoperability of transport services. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the number of inland and maritime ports and airports connected to each other and to the railway network and inland waterways, and by the number of multimodal logistics platforms created.
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii (iii) optimise the integration and interconnection of transport modes and enhancing interoperability of transport services. The achievement of this objective will be measured
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii (iii) optimise the integration and interconnection of transport modes and enhancing interoperability of transport services. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the number of industrial centres, ports and airports connected to the railway network.
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii (iii) optimise the integration and interconnection of transport modes and enhancing interoperability and accessibility of transport services. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the number of ports and airports connected to the railway network.
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii (iii) optimise the integration and interconnection of transport modes and enhancing interoperability of transport services. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the number of ports and airports connected to the railway network, by the effective deployment of ERTMS, RIS and ITS as well as the number of urban areas with integrated logistic management systems at 'zero emissions' of CO2.
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii (iii) optimise the integration and interconnection of transport modes and enhancing multimodality and interoperability of transport services. The achievement of this objective will be measured by the number of ports
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii (iii) optimis
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii a (new) (iii a) boosting a modal shift towards more sustainable modes, such as rail and sustainable waterborne transport, in order to minimise all environmental and social costs, including accidents, greenhouse gas emissions, air pollutants, noise, water and soil contamination as well as protecting biodiversity, habitats and health;
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii a (new) (iii a) preparing for future transport flows.
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iii a (new) (iii a) iv) enabling the decarbonisation of all modes of transport through transition to innovative low-carbon and energy efficient transport technologies as well as the introduction of alternative propulsion systems and the provision of the adequate infrastructure required to support the transition to a low-carbon economy and transport system.
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) promoting the further integration of the internal energy market and the interoperability of electricity and gas networks across borders, including by ensuring that no Member State is isolated from the European network or dependent on a single source, to be measured by the number of projects effectively contributing to the competition of sources and price convergence by interconnecting Member states‘ networks and removing internal bottlenecks;
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) promoting the further integration of the internal energy market and the interoperability of electricity and gas networks across borders, including by ensuring that no Member State is isolated
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) promoting the further integration of the internal energy market and the interoperability of electricity
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) promoting the further integration of the internal energy market and the
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) promoting
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i i) promoting
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) enhancing Union security of supply, to be measured by the evolution of system resilience and security of system operations as well as number of finalised projects allowing diversification of supply sources, supplying counterparts and routes and increase the domestic supply period from internal emergency reserves;
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) enhancing Union security of supply, to be measured by the evolution of system
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) enhancing Union
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) enhancing Union security of supply, to be measured by the evolution of system resilience and security of system operations
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) enhancing Union security of supply in both the electricity and gas sectors, to be measured by the evolution of system resilience and efficiency and security of system operations as well as number of projects enabling access to domestic renewable energy sources and allowing diversification of supply sources, supplying counterparts and routes;
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii (iii) contributing to sustainable development and protection of the environment and public health, notably by fostering the integration of energy from renewable sources into the transmission network
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii (iii) contributing to sustainable development
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii (iii) contributing to sustainable development and protection of the environment, notably by fostering the integration of energy from renewable sources into the transmission network and developing carbon dioxide networks and investing in sustainable transport, to be measured by the transmission of renewable energy from generation to major consumption centres and storage sites, and the sum of CO2 emissions prevented by the construction of the projects which benefited from the Connecting Europe Facility.
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii (iii) contributing to sustainable development and protection of the environment, notably by fostering the integration of energy from renewable sources into the transmission network and developing carbon dioxide networks, to be measured by the transmission of renewable energy from generation to major consumption centres and storage sites, the proportion of demand response enabled and the sum of CO2 emissions prevented by the construction of the projects which benefited from the Connecting Europe Facility.
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii iii) contributing to sustainable development and protection of the environment, notably by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and fostering the integration of energy from renewable sources into the transmission network
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i (i) accelerating the deployment of fast and ultrafast broadband networks and their uptake, including by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), to be measured by the level of broadband and ultrafast broadband coverage and the number of households having subscribed for broadband connections
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i (i) accelerating the deployment of fast and ultrafast broadband networks and their uptake, including by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs),
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i (i) accelerating the deployment of fast and ultrafast broadband networks and their uptake, including by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs),
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i (i) stimulating and generating the demand for broadband services by promoting the interconnection and interoperability of national public services online as well as access to such networks, to be measured by the percentage of citizens and businesses using public services online and the availability of such services across borders; (ia) accelerating the deployment of fast and ultrafast broadband networks and their uptake through financial instruments in order to meet existing and rising demand, including by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), to be measured by the level of broadband and ultrafast broadband coverage and the number of households having subscribed for broadband connections for above 100 Mbps;
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i (i) accelerating the deployment of fast and ultrafast broadband networks
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i (i) accelerating the deployment of fast and ultrafast broadband networks and their uptake, including by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs),
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii (ii) promoting the interconnection and interoperability of national public services on-line as well as access to such networks, to be measured by the percentage of citizens and businesses using public services on-line and the availability of such services across borders. This should in turn help stimulate the demand for such services, as well as lower operating costs while maintaining employment in those public services.
Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The estimated investment requirement for trans-European networks in the transport, energy and telecommunications sectors for the period up to 2020 is EUR 50 000 000 000. The financial envelope for the implementation of the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014 to 2020 shall be EUR 50 000 000 000. That amount shall be distributed among the sectors referred to in Article 3 as follows:
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transport: [EUR 31 694 000 000], out of which [EUR 10 000 000 000] shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transport: [EUR 31 694 000 000n], out of which [EUR 10 000 000 000] shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent in line with this Regulation exclusively in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund;
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transport: EUR 31 694 000 000, out of which EUR 10 000 000 000 shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent, on the basis of national allocations, in line with this Regulation in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund;
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transport:
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transport: [EUR 31 694 000 000],
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transport: [EUR 31 694 000 000], out of which [EUR 10 000 000 000] shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) transport: [EUR 31 694 000 000], out of which [EUR 10 000 000 000] shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent in line with this Regulation in Member States
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) energy:
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) telecommunications:
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The financial envelope of the Connecting Europe Facility
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Following the mid-term evaluation according to Article 26.1, Parliament and the Council may, on a proposal from the Commission
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Following the mid-term evaluation according to Article 26(1), the Commission may transfer, by delegated acts in accordance with Article 25 appropriations between the sectors of the allocation set out in paragraph 1, with the exception of the [EUR 10 000 000 000] transferred from the Cohesion Fund to finance transport sector projects in the Cohesion Fund eligible Member States.
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Following the mid-term evaluation according to Article 26(1), the Commission
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Following the mid-term evaluation according to Article 26(1), the European Parliament and the Council may upon a proposal by the Commission
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. Following the mid-term evaluation according to Article 26(1), the Commission may transfer appropriations between the sectors of the allocation set out in paragraph 1, with the exception of the [EUR 10 000 000 000] transferred from the Cohesion Fund to finance transport sector projects in the Cohesion Fund eligible Member States, respecting national allocations under Cohesion Fund and in accordance with relevant provisions of the sectoral legislation.
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 1. The Connecting Europe Facility shall be implemented by one or several of the forms of financial aid, provided for by Regulation (EU) No XXX/2012 [New Financial Regulation], in particular, grants, procurements, programme contracts and financial instruments.
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point 1 (new) (1) 60% of the total budget for the energy sector shall be allocated through financial instruments.
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 A (new) Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1 a. The Commission shall be entitled to determine the forms of financial aid to provide eligible projects with effective tailor-made financial support.
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. At least 80% of the total budget for the energy sector and the telecommunications sector shall be allocated through financial instruments.
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part In the field of transport, only actions contributing to projects of common interest according to Regulation (EU) No XXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines] and programme support actions, shall be eligible for support through Union financial aid in the form of procurement and financial instruments under this Regulation, provided that the polluter pays principle enshrined in Article 191 of the Treaties is applied, namely through the levying of road charges according to Eurovignette Directive 2011/76/EC and of mark-ups in mountainous regions. In the form of grants, only the following actions shall be eligible to receive Union financial aid under this Regulation:
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) actions implementing the core network according to Chapter III and comprehensive network according to Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines], including the deployment of new technologies and innovation according to Article 39 of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines];
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) actions implementing the core network according to Chapter III of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines], including the deployment of new technologies a
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a A (new) (aa) actions implementing the comprehensive network in compliance with Chapter II of the EU Regulation on the TEN-T guidelines, where such actions help to interconnect all the EU's regions, including the most remote and outermost regions, and contribute to the development of the core network;
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) actions implementing the comprehensive network according to Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines] when such actions contribute to facilitating cross-border traffic flows or removing bottlenecks and when these actions also contribute to the development of the core network
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) actions implementing the comprehensive network in accordance with Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines], where such actions contribute to improving cross-border traffic flows or removing bottlenecks, up to a ceiling of 5% of the financial envelope for transport as laid down in Article 5 of this Regulation;
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) actions implementing the comprehensive network according to Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines] when such actions contribute to facilitating cross-border traffic flows or removing bottlenecks and when these actions also contribute to the development of the core network, up to a ceiling of 5% of the financial envelope for transport as specified in Article 5 of this Regulation.
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new) (a a) actions implementing the comprehensive network according to Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines] when such actions contribute to facilitating cross-border traffic flows or removing bottlenecks and when these actions also contribute to the development of the core network, up to a ceiling of 5% of the financial envelope for transport as specified in Article 5 of this Regulation;
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) actions implementing the comprehensive network according to Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines] when such actions contribute to facilitating cross-border traffic flows or removing bottlenecks, up to a ceiling of 5% of the financial envelope for transport as specified in Article 5 of this Regulation;
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 a (new) actions implementing the comprehensive network according to Chapter II of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines] when such actions contribute to facilitating cross-border traffic flows or removing bottlenecks, up to a ceiling of 5% of the financial envelope for transport as specified in Article 5 of this Regulation;
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) studies for projects of common interest which are part of Decision 661/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2010 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network;
Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) actions supporting urban nodes as defined in Article 36 of the Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines];
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) actions supporting urban nodes as defined in Article 36 of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines];
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f (f) actions to reduce rail freight noise
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f (f) actions to reduce rail freight noise by means of infrastructure measures and retrofitting of existing rolling stock;
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f (f) actions to reduce rail freight noise at the source by retrofitting of existing rolling stock;
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f (f) actions t
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f (f) actions to reduce rail freight noise including by retrofitting of existing rolling stock;
Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f (f) actions to pre
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f (f) actions t
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new) Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) actions to develop new technologies which will lead to sustainable transport and reduce the external costs of all forms of transport;
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) support measures for new technologies and innovations for all transport modes.
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 Transport-related actions involving a cross- border section or a part of such a section shall be eligible to receive Union financial aid if
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 3 The 'user pays' and 'polluter pays' principles shall be applied. Grant funding for projects with
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 3. In the field of energy, the specific eligibility conditions of actions implementing projects of common interest for Union financial aid in the form of financial instruments
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new) At least 75% of the total amount allocated to the energy sector within this Regulation shall be assigned to electricity infrastructure;
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. After the aforementioned eligibility conditions are fulfilled, the selection should follow the projects' degree of contribution to one or more of the following relevant objectives: a) promoting the further integration of the internal energy market and the interoperability of electricity and gas networks across borders; b) enhancing the Union's security of energy supply, by enhancing system resilience and security of systems operation; c) contributing to a sustainable development and protection of the environment, inter alia by ensuring transmission of renewable electricity from generation to major consumption centres and storage sites. As matter of urgency for the annual work programmes of the Connecting Europe Facility for 2013 and 2014, priority shall be given to projects contributing to the promotion of further integration and the interoperability of electricity and gas networks across borders, notably reduction or elimination of energy isolation.
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Projects that contribute to economic growth and job creation in the Mediterranean and its neighbourhood
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 4. In the field of telecommunication,
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 A (new) 4a. Actions relating to projects of common interest with synergies in at least two of the sectors covered by the CEF, as listed in part IIIa of the annex, shall be eligible to receive financial aid from the Union under this Regulation.
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Actions implementing projects of common interest with synergies between at least two of the sectors (transport, energy or telecommunications) covered by the CEF shall be eligible to receive financial aid from the Union under this Regulation. A list of the actions coming within this category is given below. Deployment of non-fossil-fuel and non- polluting supply networks (e.g. electricity or hydrogen) for means of transport. Implementation of smart grids based on new or existing transport and telecommunication infrastructure. Use of transport infrastructure (e.g. tunnels, bridges, etc.) for the deployment of new interconnectors which increase electrical capacity, of new gas corridors or of telecommunications networks. Transport infrastructure measures which increase the sector’s economic sustainability by means of on-site generation of energy from renewable sources.
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 4. The cost of equipment and infrastructure which is treated as capital expenditure by the beneficiary may be eligible up to its entirety, provided that its use is duly justified for the sole implementation of the project.
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. Expenditure related to environmental studies on the protection of the environment and on compliance with the Union acquis
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 6 Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 6 Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 6 6. Expenditure related to the purchase of
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 6 6. Expenditure related to the purchase of land shall
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Expenditure related to the expropriation of land to implement a priority project shall be eligible.
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 7 7. VAT
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 7 7. VAT shall not be an eligible cost unless it may not be recovered by the final beneficiary under national VAT legislation.
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 7 7. Non refundable VAT shall
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 7 7. VAT shall
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 7 7. Non-refundable VAT shall
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 8 a (new) 8a. All applications for grants as well as the Commission’s documentation and assessment shall be made available to the European Parliament with full transparency.
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Proposals may be submitted by one or several Member States, international organisations, joint undertakings, regional and local authorities or public or private undertakings or bodies established in Member States.
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 1. Proposals may be submitted by one or several Member States, regional and local authorities, international organisations, joint undertakings, or public or private undertakings or bodies established in Member States.
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 They may not receive funding under this Regulation, except where it is
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2 They may not receive funding under this Regulation,
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 5 5. The agreement of Member States concerned by the action shall accompany all proposals for grants except in the field of telecommunications
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 6 Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6 a. Proposals for projects should be supported by a socio-economic case for the receipt of funding, including a cost benefit analysis.
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 1. Except in cases referred to in Article XXX of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [New Financial Regulation], proposals shall be selected through calls for proposals based on the
Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (b a) (iii) technological innovation: actions concerning the decarbonisation of transport, including infrastructure for alternative propulsion systems; the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 50% of the eligible costs.
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) for rail and inland waterways
Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail and inland waterways: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost; the funding rate may be increased to 30% for actions addressing bottlenecks; the funding rate may be increased to 40% for actions concerning cross-border sections, including ports and port hinterlands;
Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail, road and inland waterways: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost; the funding rate may be increased to 30% for actions addressing bottlenecks; the funding rate may be increased to 40% for actions concerning cross-border sections;
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail and inland waterways: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost; the funding rate may be increased to 30% for actions addressing bottlenecks; the funding rate may be increased to
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail and inland waterways: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost; the funding rate may be increased to 30% for actions both addressing bottlenecks and reducing rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock; the funding rate may be increased to 40% for actions concerning cross-border sections;
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail and inland waterways
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail and inland waterways: the amount
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) for rail and inland waterways
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail and inland waterways: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed
Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) rail and inland waterways and motorways of the sea: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed
Amendment 423 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i i) rail and inland waterways and roads: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible costs; the funding rate may be increased to 30% for actions addressing bottlenecks; the funding rate may be increased to 40% for actions concerning cross-border sections;
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i a (new) (i a) inland waterways : the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 30% of the eligible cost; the funding rate may be increased to 40% for actions addressing bottlenecks and for actions concerning cross-border sections;
Amendment 425 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, actions to reduce rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock, support measures for new technologies and innovations for all transport modes, as well as development of ports and multi-modal platforms: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible costs.
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, actions supporting new technologies leading to sustainable innovation for all modes of transport, actions to reduce rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock, as well as development of maritime and inland ports and multi-modal platforms: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost.
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to inland ports, sea ports and airports, actions to
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to ports
Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports,
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to ports
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports,
Amendment 433 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to ports
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, actions to reduce rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock, as well as development of ports and multi-modal platforms: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii ii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, actions to reduce rail freight noise by means of infrastructure measures and retrofitting of existing rolling stock, as well as development of maritime and inland ports and multi-
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii a (new) (ii a) mitigating exposure of urban areas to negative effects of transiting rail and road transport.
Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii a (new) (ii a) for actions to support cross-border road sections, 30 % of the eligible cost;
Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii a (new) (iia) for actions supporting cross-border road sections, up to 30% of the eligible costs.
Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii a (new) (ii a) for actions to support cross-border road sections, 10% of the eligible cost;
Amendment 440 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii a (new) (ii a) for actions to support cross-border road sections, 10% of the eligible cost;
Amendment 441 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii a (new) (ii a) the co-financing rates for actions that aim at ensuring barrier-free access to transport infrastructure for disabled passengers and PRMs, such as those with wheelchairs, strollers, bicycles and heavy luggage, may be increased by up to 20 additional percentage points;
Amendment 442 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii a (new) (ii a) actions to prevent noise as well as to mitigate its impact caused by rail transport by retrofitting of existing rolling stock as well as the improvement of safety of level crossings or replacing them with bridges or underpasses: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20 % of the eligible cost.
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii a (new) (ii a) actions supporting new technologies and innovation for all modes of transport, including infrastructure for alternative fuels and technologies: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20 % of eligible cost.
Amendment 444 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii a (new) (ii a) actions supporting new technologies and innovation that decarbonise any mode of transport: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 50% of the eligible cost.
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii a (new) (ii a) in order to prevent distortions of competition with road transport to the detriment of rail transport, actions to reduce rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock may benefit from Union financial aid of up to 30% of the eligible cost.
Amendment 446 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii a (new) (ii a) iii) actions, enabling the decarbonisation of all transport modes through the transition to innovative low- carbon and energy efficient transport technologies as well as the introduction of alternative propulsion systems and the provision of adequate support infrastructure to enable this transition; the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost; the funding rate may be increased if necessary for actions concerning cross- border sections and of common EU interest;
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii a (new) iia) actions to support new technologies and innovations for all forms of transport which help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible costs.
Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii b (new) (ii b) inland transport connections to airports and actions to reduce rail freight noise by retrofitting of existing rolling stock: the amount of the Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of eligible cost
Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (b a) for actions to support cross-border road sections, 30 % of the eligible cost;
Amendment 450 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (c a) Road projects which aim to remove bottlenecks on the TEN-T, financial aid shall not exceed 10% of the eligible costs.
Amendment 451 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (c a) with regard to grants for the purchase of new locomotives in conjunction with a scrapping bonus for (i) diesel or hybrid locomotives if emissions are distinctively reduced compared to the scrapped diesel or hybrid locomotive; the funding rate shall not exceed 20% of the eligible costs of the new locomotive. (ii) electric locomotives if cross border operation is distinctively enhanced compared to the scrapped locomotive; the funding rate shall not exceed 20% of the eligible costs of the new locomotive.
Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i Amendment 453 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (i) the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) and river information services (RIS) the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 50% of the eligible costs;
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (i) the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) including track side equipment and on board equipment: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 50% of the eligible cost;
Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (i) the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) and actions to reduce rail freight noise at the source by retrofitting of existing rolling stock: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 50% of the eligible cost;
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (i) the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) and River Information Systems: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 50% of the eligible cost;
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i a (new) (i a) actions to support the development of Motorways of the Sea: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 30% of the eligible costs;
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (ii) traffic management systems others than ERTMS, freight transport services, secure parkings on the road core network, as well as actions to support the development of Motorways of the Seas: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost.
Amendment 459 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (ii) traffic management systems, freight transport services,
Amendment 460 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (ii) traffic management systems, freight transport services, secure parkings on the road core network
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (ii) road traffic management systems (ITS), freight transport services, secure parkings on the road core network, as well as actions to support the development of Motorways of the Seas and implementation of SESAR: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost.
Amendment 462 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (ii) traffic management systems,
Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (ii) road traffic management systems(ITS), freight transport services
Amendment 464 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (ii) traffic management systems, including the implementation of the land-based and on-board components of RIS, VTMIS and SESAR, freight transport services, secure parkings on the road core network, as well as actions to support the development of Motorways of the Seas: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii (ii) traffic and logistics management systems, multimodal transport platforms, freight transport services, secure parkings on the road core network, as well as actions to support the development of Motorways of the Seas: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost.
Amendment 466 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii a (new) (ii a) Actions to support the development of Motorways of the Seas: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 30% of the eligible cost
Amendment 467 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii a (new) (ii a) actions supporting new technologies and innovation for all modes of transport : the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 20% of the eligible cost
Amendment 468 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii b (new) (ii b) Actions to support the implementation of the components of SESAR: the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 30% of the eligible cost.
Amendment 469 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 50% of the eligible cost of studies and
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) with regard to grants for studies, the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 50% of the eligible cost
Amendment 471 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) the amount of Union financial aid shall not exceed 50% of the eligible cost of studies and/or of works;
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) co-financing rates may be increased to a maximum of
Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point b (b)
Amendment 474 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) co-financing rates may be increased to
Amendment 475 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) actions in the field of broadband networks: the amount of Union financial aid shall
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 5. Co-financing rates mentioned above may be increased by up to 10 percentage points for actions having cross-sector synergies, reaching climate mitigation objectives, enhancing climate resilience
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 5. Co-financing rates mentioned above may be increased by up to 10 percentage points for actions having cross-sector synergies, reaching climate mitigation objectives, enhancing climate resilience or reducing the greenhouse gas emissions and in the case of investments in areas with natural disadvantages, such as the outermost regions, in line with Articles 355 and 375 TFEU. This increase should not apply to co-
Amendment 478 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 5. Co-financing rates mentioned above may be increased by up to 10 percentage points for actions having cross-sector synergies,
Amendment 479 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 5. Co-financing rates mentioned above may be increased by up to 10 percentage points
Amendment 480 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 5. Co-financing rates mentioned above may be increased by up to 10 percentage points
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 A (new) 5a. The Commission shall propose, in the annual and multiannual programmes under Article 17, the criteria for the granting of the cofinancing rates laid down in this article.
Amendment 482 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. any action enhancing the accessibility of transport infrastructure for elderly people, persons of reduced mobility and disabled passengers.
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 6 6. The amount of financial aid to be granted to the actions selected may will be modulated based on a cost-benefit analysis of each project, availability of budget resources, and the need to maximise the leverage of EU funding.
Amendment 484 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 Amendment 485 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. As regards the [EUR 10 000 000 000] transferred from the Cohesion Fund [Regulation XXX Article XX] to be spent exclusively in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund, specific calls shall be launched for projects implementing the core network exclusively in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund.
Amendment 486 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. As regards the [EUR 10 000 000 000] transferred from the Cohesion Fund [Regulation XXX Article XX] to be spent in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund,
Amendment 487 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. As regards the [EUR 10 000 000 000] transferred from the Cohesion Fund [Regulation XXX Article XX] to be spent in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund, specific calls shall be launched for projects implementing the core network (and in particular the core network corridors) exclusively in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund.
Amendment 488 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 1 1. As regards the EUR 10 000 000 000 transferred from the Cohesion Fund [Regulation XXX Article XX] to be spent, on the basis of national allocations, in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund, specific calls shall be launched for projects implementing the core and global network exclusively in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund.
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Applicable rules for the transport sector under this Regulation shall apply to these specific calls.
Amendment 490 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Applicable rules for the transport sector under this Regulation shall apply to these specific calls. When implementing these calls,
Amendment 491 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Applicable rules for the transport sector under this Regulation shall apply to these specific calls. When implementing these calls,
Amendment 492 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Applicable rules for the transport sector under this Regulation shall apply to these specific calls.
Amendment 493 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2.
Amendment 494 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Applicable rules for the transport sector under this Regulation shall apply to these
Amendment 495 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. By the way of derogation from Article 10, and as regards the [EUR 10 000 000 000] transferred from the Cohesion Fund [Regulation XXX Article XX] to be spent exclusively in Member States eligible for funding from
Amendment 496 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. By the way of derogation from Article 10, and as regards the EUR [10 000 000 000] transferred from the Cohesion Fund [Regulation XXX Article XX] to be spent, on the basis of national allocations, in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund, the maximum funding rates shall be those applicable to the Cohesion Fund referred to in Article 22 and Article 110.3 of Regulation (EU) No XXX2012 [Regulation laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund covered by the Common Strategic Framework and laying
Amendment 497 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. In order to support Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund, which may experience difficulties in designing projects that are of a sufficient maturity, quality and EU added-value, particular attention shall be given to programme support actions under the Connecting Europe Facility aimed at strengthening institutional capacity and efficiency of the public administrations and public services related to the development and implementation of projects listed in Annex 1 of this Regulation. To ensure the highest possible absorption of the transferred funds in all Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund, the Commission may organise additional calls.
Amendment 498 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The [EUR 10 000 000 000] transferred from the Cohesion Fund shall not be counted into the [ ...]¹ % GDP capping methodology for Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fund. _____________________ ¹Pending agreement on the Multiannual Financial Framework for the period 2014-2020.
Amendment 499 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. Support from the Cohesion Fund for sustainable transport infrastructure projects of European added value as listed in the Annex of Regulation ...../2013/EC on establishing the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) shall be implemented in accordance with the Cohesion Fund Regulation as well as the Regulation ...../2013/EC on Union guidelines for the development of the Trans-European Transport Guidelines (TEN-T).
Amendment 500 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. The decision on the selection of projects co-financed by the Cohesion Fund and defined under the CEF and TEN-T Regulations shall be annually proposed by the Commission and decided by the European Parliament and the Council. The Commission shall be responsible for the management and implementation of these decided projects, in accordance with the CEF and TEN-T Regulations.
Amendment 501 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point i (i) rail and inland waterways and motorways of the sea;
Amendment 502 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point i (i) road, rail and inland waterways;
Amendment 503 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point i (i) rail and sustainable navigable inland waterways;
Amendment 504 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point ii (ii) actions to support cross-border road sections, TEN-T core road network and, in the case of Member States with no rail networks, the TEN-T road network;
Amendment 505 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point ii (ii) actions to support cross-border r
Amendment 506 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point ii A (new) (iia) actions to support the development of motorways of the sea;
Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii (iii) inland transport connections to ports and airports, development of multi-modal platforms including automatic gauge changing facilities and of ports;
Amendment 508 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii (iii) inland transport connections to ports
Amendment 509 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii a (new) (iii a) actions mitigating exposure of urban areas to negative effects of transiting rail and road transport.
Amendment 510 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point b – point iii a (new) (iii a) actions targeting the reduction of rail noise including by retrofitting of existing rolling stocks in order to ensure viable use of the TEN-T network respecting noise level requirements.
Amendment 511 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) (c a) actions targeting the reduction of rail noise including by retrofitting of existing rolling stock in order to ensure viable use of the TEN-T network respecting noise level requirements.
Amendment 512 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c – point i (i) the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS); the River Information Services (RIS) and the Vessel Traffic Monitoring and Information systems (VTMIS).
Amendment 513 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c – point ii (ii) traffic management systems other than ERTMS.
Amendment 514 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c – point ii a (new) (ii a) noise reduction of rail freight at the source.
Amendment 515 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall cancel, except in duly justified cases, financial aid granted for actions which have not been started within
Amendment 516 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) in the event of an irregularity committed in the implementation of the action
Amendment 517 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) following an evaluation of the progress of the project, in particular in the event of major and unjustified delays in the implementation of the action.
Amendment 518 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 Amendment 519 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission may request the reimbursement of the financial aid granted if, within
Amendment 520 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. The Commission may request the reimbursement of the financial aid granted in case of non-use, abandoning or dismantling of EU co-funded infrastructure.
Amendment 521 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3 b. If an action suffers from delays of more than one year compared to the foreseen timetable, namely in cases where Member States cannot ensure sufficient funding due to the effects of the financial crisis, the Commission may impose a moratorium and assess the possibility of upgrading of existing infrastructure as a more rapid alternative option;
Amendment 522 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 4 4. Before the Commission takes any of the decisions provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, it shall examine the case at hand and inform the beneficiaries concerned so that they may present their observations within a given timeframe. It shall inform the European Parliament and the Council of all the decisions taken on the annual adoption of the programmes under Article 17.
Amendment 523 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 a (new) Article 13a In order to guarantee broad and fair competition for projects funded under the CEF, the form of the contract must be consistent with the aims and circumstances of the project. The terms of the contract must be drafted in such a way as to spread the risks associated with the work to be carried out fairly, in order to maximise cost-effectiveness and ensure that the work is performed as efficiently as possible. This principle shall apply irrespective of whether a national or international contract model is employed.
Amendment 524 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The form of the contract must be consistent with the basis for and the circumstances of the project and guarantee broad and fair competition for projects co-funded under the CEF which are the subject of public procurement procedures. In order to secure the most economically advantageous price and ensure that the project is carried out as efficiently as possible, the basic provisions of the contract should be fair and reflect the risks associated with the project, irrespective of national or international standards.
Amendment 525 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3.
Amendment 526 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. (c) financial instruments aimed at facilitating private investments for the introduction of innovative technologies with higher investment risks.
Amendment 527 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) loans and/or guarantees facilitated by risk-sharing instruments, including inter alia enhancement mechanism to project bonds, issued by a financial institution on its own resources with a Union contribution to the provisioning and/or capital allocation;
Amendment 528 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) ba) specific funding instruments which encourage private investment in the introduction of new, innovative technologies which involve a higher investment risk;
Amendment 529 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c (c)
Amendment 530 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c (c)
Amendment 531 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) (c a) dedicated financial instruments aiming to facilitate private investments for infrastructure projects using new technologies and innovation that improve the environmental sustainability of a transport mode and have higher investment risks.
Amendment 532 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. Actions supported by means of financial instruments shall be selected on a first come first served basis and shall seek sectoral diversification in accordance with Articles 3 and 4 as well as
Amendment 533 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. Actions supported by means of financial instruments shall be selected on a first come first served basis and shall seek sectoral diversification in accordance with Articles 3 and 4 as well as
Amendment 534 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. Actions supported by means of financial instruments s shall be selected on a
Amendment 535 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. Actions supported by means of financial instruments shall
Amendment 536 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. Actions supported by means of financial instruments shall be selected on
Amendment 537 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1. Actions supported by means of financial instruments shall
Amendment 538 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 539 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. The financial instruments shall aim to preserve the value of assets provided by the Union budget. They may generate acceptable returns
Amendment 540 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 3. The financial instruments shall aim to preserve the value of assets provided by the Union budget.
Amendment 541 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 4 4. Financial instruments may be combined with grants funded from the Union budget, including under this Regulation, and complying with Chapter III; Grants supported under this article shall not exceed 15% of the allocations to each sector in accordance with Article 5.1.
Amendment 542 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 4 4. Financial instruments may be combined with grants funded from the Union budget, including under this Regulation, provided that this is necessary to ensure the project is viable.
Amendment 543 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 5 Amendment 544 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 1.
Amendment 545 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall adopt multiannual and annual work programmes for each sector. The Commission may also adopt multiannual and annual work programmes that cover more than one sector. Those
Amendment 546 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 2. The multiannual work programmes shall be reviewed at least at mid-term. If necessary, the Commission shall revise the multiannual work programme by means of implementing act. Those
Amendment 547 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 548 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Multiannual work programmes in the field of transport shall be adopted for projects of common interest as listed in Part I of the Annex to this Regulation where the percentage of funds allocated to less polluting modes shall be at least 85% of the total transport budget.
Amendment 549 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Multiannual work programmes in the field of transport shall be adopted for projects of common interest as listed in Part I of the Annex to this Regulation, in which the percentage of funds allocated to less polluting modes shall be at least 85% of the total transport budget.
Amendment 550 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 Amendment 551 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The amount of the financial envelope shall lie within a range of
Amendment 552 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The amount of the financial envelope shall lie within a range of
Amendment 553 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 a (new) The projects detailed in Part I of the Annex are not binding on the Member States for their programming decisions. The decision to implement these projects is a competence of Member States and will depend on public financing capacities, and on their socio-economic viability in accordance with the provisions of Article 7 of Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [TEN-T Guidelines].
Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 4. The multiannual work programmes in the field of energy and telecommunications
Amendment 555 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 5. The sectoral annual work programmes, in the field of transport, energy and telecommunications, shall be adopted for projects of common interest not included in the multiannual programmes, while respecting in the transport sector the provision of allocating at least 85% of available funds to less polluting modes.
Amendment 556 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. The Commission shall publish annually a scoreboard depicting the progress of all projects of common interest included in the CEF.
Amendment 557 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 – introductory part 6. Acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in paragraph 1, the Commission, when establishing multiannual and sectoral annual work programmes, shall establish the selection and award criteria in line with the objectives and priorities laid down in Articles 3 and 4 of this Regulation and :
Amendment 558 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 – introductory part 6. Acting in accordance with the procedure referred in paragraph 1, the Commission, when establishing multiannual and sectoral annual work programmes, shall establish
Amendment 559 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 – point a Amendment 560 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 – point b Amendment 561 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 – point c Amendment 562 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 7 7. Work programmes shall be coordinated in order to exploit the synergies between transport, energy and telecommunications, notably in such areas as smart energy grids, electric mobility (including trains, tramways, electric bicycles and electric cars), intelligent and sustainable transport systems. Multi-
Amendment 563 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 Amendment 564 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 Amendment 565 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 Amendment 566 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 25 concerning the addition or modification of the lists provided in the Annex and in delivering the multiannual and annual work programme for each sector or covering more than one sector according to article 17.]
Amendment 567 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 2 Member States shall for projects related to transport and energy sectors, undertake the technical monitoring and financial control of actions, including those ensuring the deployment of consultation procedures and compliance with the relevant EU legislation on environment and climate change in close cooperation with the Commission and shall certify the reality and the conformity of the expenditure incurred in respect of projects or parts of projects. The Member States may request the participation of the Commission during on-the-spot checks.
Amendment 568 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 3 Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 4 Member States shall inform the Commission continuously, if relevant through the interactive geographical and technical information systems, which in case of the trans-European transport networks is TENtec, about the progress made in implementing projects of common interest and the investments made for this purpose including the amount of support used for climate change objectives. The TENtec shall be publicly and easily accessible. It shall contain project-specific and updated information on the forms and amounts of EU co-funding as well as on the progress of each project.
Amendment 570 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 4 Member States shall inform the Commission
Amendment 571 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 Only actions in
Amendment 572 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. If a large-scale project fails to comply with the general principles laid down in Article 13a, it may not be supported using CEF funds. The Commission shall give the Member State concerned the opportunity to bring the project into line with the general principles in question.
Amendment 573 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. The Commission shall be assisted by
Amendment 574 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 Amendment 575 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. The committees shall
Amendment 576 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 3. The committee shall ensure a horizontal overview of the work programmes referred in article 18 to ensure their consistency and that synergies are identified
Amendment 577 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 Amendment 578 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 Amendment 579 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 20 shall be conferred on the Commission for a
Amendment 580 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article 5 paragraph 3 and Article 20 shall be conferred on the Commission for an indeterminate period from the date of entry into force of
Amendment 581 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Articles 5, 17 and 20 shall be conferred on the Commission for
Amendment 582 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of power referred to in Article 5 paragraph 3 and Article 20 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament or by the Council. A decision to revoke shall put an end to the delegation of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall
Amendment 583 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 1 1. No later than
Amendment 584 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall
Amendment 585 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 4 4. The Commission shall communicate
Amendment 586 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 1. Beneficiaries and, where appropriate, Member States concerned shall ensure that suitable publicity and transparency is given to aid granted under this Regulation in order to inform the public of the role of the Union in the implementation of the projects.
Amendment 587 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 2 2. The Commission shall implement information and communication actions on the Connecting Europe Facility projects and results.
source: PE-496.337
2012/10/17
TRAN, ITRE
156 amendments...
Amendment 588 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point a Innovative Management & Services Single European Sky - SESAR Innovative Management & Services Traffic Management Systems for Road, Rail and Inland Waterways (ITS, ERTMS and
Amendment 589 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point a Innovative Management & Services Single European Sky - SESAR
Amendment 590 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point a Innovative Management & Services Single European Sky - SESAR Innovative Management & Services Traffic Management Systems for Road, Rail and Inland Waterways (ITS, ERTMS and RIS)
Amendment 591 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point a Innovative Management & Services Single European Sky - SESAR Innovative Management & Services Traffic Management Systems for Road, Rail
Amendment 592 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – Point a Innovative Management & Single European Sky - SESAR Services Innovative Management & Traffic Management Systems for Road, Rail and Services Inland Waterways (ITS, ERTMS, RIS and
Amendment 593 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point a Amendment 594 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point a Innovative Management & Services Single European Sky - SESAR Innovative Management & Services Traffic Management Systems for Road, Rail and Inland Waterways (ITS, ERTMS and RIS) Innovative Management & Services
Amendment 595 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – Point a Innovative Management & Single European Sky - SESAR Services Innovative Management & Traffic Management Systems for Road, Rail and Services Inland Waterways (ITS, ERTMS and RIS), infrastructure for the supply of alternative and in particular low or zero carbon energy for transport Innovative Management & Core Network Ports and Airports Services
Amendment 596 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - introductory part Helsinki – Tallinn – Riga – Kaunas – Warszawa – Katowice Gdynia – Katowice Katowice – Ostrava – Brno – Wien Katowice – Žilina – Bratislava – Wien Wien – Graz – Klagenfurt – Villach – Udine – Venezia – Bologna – Ravenna Graz – Maribor –Ljubljana – Koper/Trieste
Amendment 597 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – introductory part Helsinki – Tallinn – Riga – Kaunas –
Amendment 598 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - introductory part Helsinki – Tallinn – Riga – Kaunas – Warszawa – Katowice Gdynia – Katowice Katowice – Ostrava – Brno – Wien Katowice – Žilina – Bratislava – Wien Wien – Graz – Klagenfurt – Villach – Udine – Venezia – Bologna – Ravenna Graz – Maribor – Ljubljana – Koper/Trieste
Amendment 599 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - introductory part Helsinki – Tallinn – Riga – Kaunas – Warszawa – Katowice Gdynia – Katowice Katowice – Ostrava –
Amendment 600 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - introductory part Helsinki – Tallinn – Riga – Kaunas – Warszawa – Katowice Gdynia – Katowice Katowice – Ostrava – Brno – Wien Katowice – Žilina – Bratislava – Wien Wien – Graz – Klagenfurt – Villach – Udine – Venezia – Bologna – Ravenna Graz – Maribor – Ljubljana – Koper/Trieste
Amendment 601 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – introductory part Helsinki – Tallinn – Riga – Kaunas – Warszawa – Katowice Gdynia – Katowice Katowice – Ostrava – Brno – Wien
Amendment 602 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – introductory part Helsinki – Tallinn – Riga – Kaunas – Warszawa – Katowice Gdynia – Katowice Katowice – Ostrava – Brno – Wien Katowice – Žilina – Bratislava – Wien Wien – Graz – Klagenfurt – Villach – Udine – Venezia – Bologna – Ravenna Graz – Ljubljana – Koper/Trieste Szczecin/Świnoujście - Poznań - Wrocław - Ostrava
Amendment 603 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part 1 – point 1 – introductory part Helsinki – Tallinn – Riga – Kaunas – Warszawa – Katowice Gdynia – Katowice Katowice – Ostrava – Brno – Wien Katowice – Žilina – Bratislava – Wien Wien – Graz – Klagenfurt – Villach – Udine – Venezia – Bologna – Ravenna Graz – Maribor –Ljubljana – Koper/Trieste
Amendment 604 #
Helsinki – Tallinn – Riga – Kaunas – Warszawa – Katowice Gdynia – Katowice Katowice – Ostrava – Brno – Wien Katowice – Žilina – Bratislava – Wien Wien – Graz – Klagenfurt – Villach – Udine – Venezia – Bologna – Ravenna Graz – Ljubljana – Koper/Trieste Szczecin/Świnoujście - Poznań/Zielona Góra - Wrocław - Ostrava
Amendment 605 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 Amendment 606 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - rows 2 a-b (new) Klaip÷da - Kaunas Rail Upgrading, port interconnections, MoS Via Baltica Corridor Road Upgrading (EE, LV, LT,PL)
Amendment 607 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - row 6 Katowice - Ostrava - Brno Rail upgrading, in particular - Wien & Katowice - cross-border sections PL- Žilina - Bratislava - Wien CZ, PL-SK
Amendment 608 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - row 7 Katowice - Ostrava - Rail upgrading, in particular
Amendment 609 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - row 8 Wien -
Amendment 610 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – row 8 Wien - Graz - Klagenfurt - Rail upgrading and works Udine - Venezia - ongoing
Amendment 611 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - row 8 a (new) Ravenna - Ancona Rail upgrading
Amendment 612 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - row 8 a (new) Graz - Maribor - Rail studies and works for Pragersko second track
Amendment 613 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – row 8 a (new) Graz - Maribor - Rail studies and works for Pragersko second track
Amendment 614 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - row 9 Koper, Trieste, Venice,
Amendment 615 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - row 9 Trieste, Venice, Ravenna
Amendment 616 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – row 9 Trieste, Venice, Ravenna
Amendment 617 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – row 9 Trieste, Venice, Ravenna Rail port interconnections,
Amendment 618 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - row 9 a (new) Graz - Maribor - Rail studies and works for a Pragersko second track
Amendment 619 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 1 - row 9 a (new) Ancona Ports port interconnections, (further) development of multimodal platforms
Amendment 620 #
Wrocław - Poznań - Rail works Szczecin/Świnoujście
Amendment 621 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – row 9 a (new) Wrocław - Rail works Poznań/Zielona Góra - Szczecin/Świnoujście
Amendment 622 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 1 – row 9 b (new) Świnoujście, Szczecin Port port interconnections
Amendment 623 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 2 – title 2. Warszawa – Berlin – A
Amendment 624 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 2 – introductory part Amendment 625 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 2 – row 2 a (new) UA border – Lublin – Rail upgrading existing line, Warszawa – Poznań – studies for extension DE border
Amendment 626 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 2 – row 4 a (new) Rhine-Waal- IWW multimodal connections Noordzeekanaal
Amendment 627 #
Amsterdam locks
Amendment 628 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 3 – introductory part Algeciras – Madrid – Zaragoza – Tarragona Sevilla – Valencia – Tarragona Tarragona – Barcelona – Perpignan – Lyon – Torino – Milano – Venezia – Ljubljana – Budapest – UA border
Amendment 629 #
Algeciras – Madrid – Tarragona Sevilla – Valencia – Tarragona Tarragona – Barcelona – Perpignan – Lyon – Torino – Milano – Venezia – Ljubljana – Budapest – UA border Barcelona/Valencia – Livorno/Pisa – Firenze
Amendment 630 #
Amendment 631 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 3 – introductory part Algeciras – Madrid – Tarragona Sevilla – Valencia – Tarragona Tarragona – Barcelona – Perpignan – Marseille – Lyon – Torino – Milano – Venezia – Ljubljana –
Amendment 632 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 3 – row 5 Barcelona Port interconnections rail with port (construction of the new accesses) and airport
Amendment 633 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 3 – row 6 Barcelona - Perpignan Rail cross-border section, works ongoing, new line completed by 2015, upgrading existing line. Introduction of UIC on the Iberian existing line through Port Bou. Adaptation of the line to 750m-trains. Development of intermodal platforms and connection with the rail network on UIC + Iberian gauge
Amendment 634 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 3 – row 6 a (new) Madrid-Zaragoza- Rail Upgrading of existing Barcelona lines: Introduction of UIC on the Iberian existing line. Adaptation of the line and sidetracks to 750m-trains. Development of intermodal platforms and connection with the rail network on UIC + Iberian gauge
Amendment 635 #
Lyon - Avignon - Rail upgrading Marseille (via Miramas and Fos)
Amendment 636 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 3 - row 8 Lyon - Torino Rail cross-border section,
Amendment 637 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 3 – row 8 Lyon - Torino Rail
Amendment 638 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 3 – row 10 Brescia - Venezia - Rail works to start before 2014 Trieste on several sections in synergy with upgrading actions undertaken in overlapping stretches as in Corridor 1
Amendment 639 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 3- row 13 Koper - Divača - Rail studies and Ljubljana -
Amendment 640 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 3 - row 13 Amendment 641 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 3 - row 13 Koper - Divača - Rail studies and Ljubljana -
Amendment 642 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 3 – row 13 Koper - Divača - Rail studies and Ljubljana –
Amendment 643 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 3 – rows 17 a-i (new) Barcelona/Valencia/Livo Motorways of the sea upgrading rno Livorno Port/RRT Port system Livorno and piombino: studies and work Interconnection Rail: studies and works Pisa, Firenze Airport Interconnection Rail; studies and works Livorno/Pisa-Firenze Rail and Road Rail: Firenze-Pisa (collegamento al upgrading corridoio Helsinki- Valletta Rail:Firenze-Prato- Pistoia-Lucca-Viareggio upgrading Road: upgrading Livorno-Grosseto Rail and Road Rail/Road Upgrading Grosseto-Siena-Arezzo- Road Upgrading Fano-Ancona Port
Amendment 644 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 4 – introductory part Hamburg / Rostock – Berlin – Praha –
Amendment 645 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 4 - row 4 Hamburg - Dresden -
Amendment 646 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 4 - row 4 Amendment 647 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 4 - row 5 Amendment 648 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 4 - row 5 a (new) Brno hub Rail rail hub Brno, including multi-modal platform
Amendment 649 #
Budapest
Amendment 650 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 4 – row 8 a (new) Craiova-Bucharest Rail studies
Amendment 651 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part 1 – point 5 – introductory part Helsinki – Turku – Stockholm – Malmö – København –
Amendment 652 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part 1 – point 5 – introductory part Helsinki – Turku – Stockholm – Malmö – København – Fehmarn – Hamburg – Hannover Bremen – Hannover – Nürnberg – Øresund/Copenhagen – Rostock - Berlin - Nürnberg -München – Brenner – Verona – Bologna – Roma – Napoli – Bari Napoli – Palermo – Valletta
Amendment 653 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 5 - introductory part Helsinki – Turku – Stockholm – Malmö – København – Lübeck – Fehmarn – Hamburg – Hannover Bremen – Hannover – Nürnberg – München – Brenner – Verona – Bologna – Roma – Napoli – Bari Napoli – Palermo – Valletta
Amendment 654 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 5 – rows 7-9 Amendment 655 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 5 - row 7 Amendment 656 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 5 - row 11 Brenner
Amendment 657 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 5 – row 11 Brenner Base Tunnel Rail studies
Amendment 658 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 6 – title 6. Genova – Rotterdam/Antwerpen
Amendment 659 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 6 – introductory part Genova – Milano/Novara – Simplon/Lötschberg/Gotthard – Basel – Mannheim – Köln Köln– Düsseldorf – Rotterdam/A
Amendment 660 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 6 – row 2 Genova - Milano/Novara - Rail studies
Amendment 661 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 7 - introductory part Sines / Lisboa – Madrid – Valladolid Lisboa – Aveiro – Oporto Aveiro – Valladolid – Vitoria – Bordeaux – Paris – Mannheim/Strasbourg Toulouse – Bordeaux – Paris – Mannheim/Strasbourg
Amendment 662 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part 1 – point 7 – introductory part Gran Canaria / Tenerife – Sines / Lisboa – Madrid – Valladolid Lisboa – Aveiro – Oporto Aveiro – Valladolid – Vitoria – Bordeaux –
Amendment 663 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part 1 – point 7 – introductory part Sines / Lisboa – Madrid – Valladolid Lisboa – Aveiro – Oporto Aveiro – Valladolid – Vitoria – Bordeaux – Paris – Mannheim/Strasbourg Le Havre – Rouen – Paris – Mannheim/Strasbourg
Amendment 664 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 7 – row 1 a (new) Gran Canaria/Tenerife – Ports, Airports, MoS port and airport studies Sines / Lisboa – Madrid and works, links between the Canaries and Sines / Lisboa
Amendment 665 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 7 - row 6 a (new) Toulouse - Bordeaux Rail ongoing public consultation
Amendment 666 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 7 – row 10 a (new) Le Havre-Paris (via Rail Upgrading Serqueux-Gisors)
Amendment 667 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 8 – introductory part Belfast – Dublin – Holyhead – Birmingham Sligo – Derry – Belfast Glasgow/Edinburgh – Birmingham Birmingham – London – Lille – Brussel/Bruxelles Dublin/Cork/Southampton – Le Havre – Paris London – Dover – Calais – Paris
Amendment 668 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 8 - row 2 a (new) Sligo - Derry - Belfast Rail studies ("Western Arc" rail network, extending from Belfast through Derry, Sligo, Knock, Galway to Limerick/Foynes and Cork)
Amendment 669 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 8 – row 2 a (new) Larne - Belfast Ports, Roads upgrading
Amendment 670 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 9 – title 9.
Amendment 671 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 9 – introductory part Amendment 672 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 9 – row 2 Maas, including upgrading, multimodal IWW Maaswerken
Amendment 673 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 9 – row 2 a (new) Rhine-Scheldt -corridor: Lock upgrading Volkeraklock and Kreekraklock, Krammerlock and Lock Hansweert
Amendment 674 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 9 – row 6 a (new) Rotterdam - Antwerp Rail upgrading rail freight line
Amendment 675 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 9 – row 7 Canal Seine
Amendment 676 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 9 – row 7 Canal Seine -
Amendment 677 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 9 – rows 11-12 Amendment 678 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 9 – rows 14 a-b (new) Lyon - Avignon - Port de Rail upgrading Marseille-Fos Marseille Port hinterland and multimodal terminal connections
Amendment 679 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 10 – introductory part Strasbourg – Stuttgart – München – Wels/Linz
Amendment 680 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 8 a (new) Budapest - Arad Rail studies for high-speed network between Budapest and Arad
Amendment 681 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 8 b (new) Buzău - Brăila - Galați Road: upgrading of specific expressway/motorway sections; studies and works
Amendment 682 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 8 c (new) Drajna - Brăila - Galați Road: upgrading of specific expressway/motorway sections; studies and works
Amendment 683 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 9 Amendment 684 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 9 a (new) Bucurešti- Buzău - Brăila Rail upgrading of specific - Galați sections; studies high- speed
Amendment 685 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 10 Main – Main-
Amendment 686 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 10 Main - Main-Donau-
Amendment 687 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 10 Main - Main-Donau- IWW studies and works on Canal - Danube several sections and bottlenecks; inland waterway ports: hinterland connections; except for works on the upgrade of the Danube river stretch Straubing- Vilshofen
Amendment 688 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point 10 – row 10 Main
Amendment 689 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 11 Constanta Port
Amendment 690 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 11 a (new) Giurgiu Port Port infrastructure improvement and repair and connections with the hinterland: studies and works
Amendment 691 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 11 b (new) Galați Port Port infrastructure improvement and repair and connections with the hinterland: studies and works
Amendment 692 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 11 c (new) Brăila Port Port infrastructure improvement and repair and connections with the hinterland: studies and works
Amendment 693 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 11 d (new) Tulcea Port Port infrastructure improvement and repair and connections with the hinterland: studies and works
Amendment 694 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - point 10 - row 11 e (new) Sulina Port Port infrastructure improvement and repair and connections with the hinterland: studies and works
Amendment 695 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 8 Amendment 696 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 8 Amendment 697 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 8 Amendment 698 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – Point b – row 8 Amendment 699 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 9 a (new) Sebeş – Turda – Other cross- Road Studies and Târgu-Mureş – border core works Paşcani – Iaşi – network Ungheni (RO/MD border)
Amendment 700 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 9 b (new) Calafat – Other core Road Studies and Craiova – network works Alexandria – Bucurešti
Amendment 701 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 9 c (new) Constanta - Other core Road Studies and Tulcea - GalaŃi network works
Amendment 702 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 9 d (new) Alba-Iulia – Other cross- Rail Studies and Turda – Dej – border core works Suceava – network Paşcani – Iaşi – Ungheni (RO/MD border)
Amendment 703 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point b – row 10 Amendment 704 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point b – row 11 a (new) Ruhr area - Other Core Rail Upgrading of the Münster - Network section Münster - Osnabrück - Lünen Hamburg (doubletrack)
Amendment 705 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - rows 23 a-b (new) Kybartai - Other Core Rail upgrading Kaunas Network Kybartai Other Core Road upgrading /Klaip÷da - Network Kaunas - Vilnius - BY border
Amendment 706 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – Point b – row 26 a (new) Nantes - Tours - Other Core Rail studies and Lyon Network works
Amendment 707 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 28 a (new) Warszawa - Cross-Border Rail works Lublin - Zamość - BełŜec - Rawa Ruska - UA border (further toward Lviv)
Amendment 708 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 28 a (new) Rail La Spezia - Other Core Rail studies and Parma Network works
Amendment 709 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point b – row 28 a (new) Lviv - UA border Cross-border Rail upgrading line - Lublin - Warszawa
Amendment 710 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – Point b – rows 28 a-b (new) Valenciennes - Cross-Border Rail studies and work Mons Mons - Liège Bottleneck Rail studies and work
Amendment 711 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – Point b – rows 28 a-e (new) Iasi-Republic of Cross-Border Rail studies ongoing Moldova border Suceava-Ukraina Cross-Border Rail studies border Oradea-Hungary Cross-Border Rail studies border Ploiesti-Suceava Other core Rail studies network Suceava-Dej- Other core Rail works ongoing Cluj Napoca- network Oradea
Amendment 712 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – Point b – row 28 a (new) Sulechów - Nowa Cross-Border Road works Sól - Hradec Králové
Amendment 713 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 28 a (new) Bucurešti.- Other core Rail Rail Buzău - Brăila - network infrastructure GalaŃi improvement and repair and connections with the hinterland; studies high- speed network
Amendment 714 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 28 b (new) Halmeu - Cluj- Other Core Railway studies and Napoca - Network works Timisoara
Amendment 715 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 28 c (new) Bihor - Oradea - Other core Rail Studies and Cluj-Napoca - network works Suceava - Iaşi - Ungheni (towards Chisinau)
Amendment 716 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 28 d (new) Drajna - Brăila - Other core Road: Road Galați network expressway/motor infrastructure way improvement and repair
Amendment 717 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 28 e (new) Buzău - Brăila - Other Core Road: Road GalaŃi Network expressway/motor infrastructure way improvement and repair
Amendment 718 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - row 28 f (new) Iasi - Targu- Other Core highway / studies and Mures - (East- Network express road works West highway)
Amendment 719 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I – point b – rows 28 a-c (new) Palencia – Other Core Rail Studies and Santander Network works Castejón – Other Core Rail Studies and Logroño – Network works Miranda Almería – Other Core Rail Studies and Málaga – Network works Algeciras (along the coast)
Amendment 720 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part I - Point b - rows 29 a-c (new) "Iron Rhine" Cross-border Rail studies ongoing (Rheidt- Antwerpen), cross border section New High- Cross-border Rail studies ongoing capacity rail: Central Trans- Pyrenees crossing Railway Axis of Cross-border Rail studies ongoing the Ionian/Adriatic Intermodal Corridor
Amendment 721 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II - Point a - point 1 1. Northern Seas offshore
Amendment 722 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II - Point a - point 2 Amendment 723 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II - Point a - point 3 3. North-South gas Increasing interconnection Belgium, Ireland, interconnections in capacities
Amendment 724 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II – Point a – point 3 Amendment 725 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II - Point a - point 4 4. North-South electricity Strengthening Austria, Bulgaria, Czech interconnections in interconnections and Republic, Cyprus, Central Eastern and South internal lines in North- Germany, Greece, Eastern Europe ("NSI South and East-West Hungary, Italy, Poland, East Electricity"): directions
Amendment 726 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II - Point a - point 5 5. North-South gas Strengthening regional Austria, Bulgaria, Czech interconnections in gas connections
Amendment 727 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II – Point a – point 5 Amendment 728 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II - Point a - point 6 6. Baltic Energy Market Developing Denmark, Estonia, Interconnection Plan in interconnections between Finland, Germany, Latvia, electricity ("BEMIP Member States in the Lithuania, Poland, Electricity"): Baltic region and Sweden reinforcing internal grid infrastructures accordingly, to end isolation of the Baltic States and to foster market integration in the region and integrate generation from renewable energy sources
Amendment 729 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II - Point a - point 7 7. Baltic Energy Market
Amendment 730 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II - Point a - point 8 8. Southern Gas Corridor
Amendment 731 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II – Point a – point 8 Amendment 732 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II – Point a – point 8 a (new) Oil supply diversification Interoperability of the oil Austria, Czech Republic, corridors in Central pipeline network in Germany, Hungary, Eastern Europe Central Eastern Europe Poland, Slovakia ("OSC"): to increase security of supply and reduce environmental risks.
Amendment 733 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II – Point b – point 5 Amendment 734 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part II – Point b – row 5 a (new) Energy efficiency Make sure that the all consumption in the EU peaks and then decreases with time
Amendment 735 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – Part III a (new) List of projects with synergies between at least two of the sectors covered by the CEF Implementation of smart grids by the exploitation of new or existing transport or telecommunication infrastructure The exploitation of existing transport infrastructures for the deployment of transmission and distribution electricity grids or telecommunication networks.
Amendment 736 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part III - Point b - introductory part Intervention in the field of broadband shall contribute to smart and inclusive growth through building a balanced and geographically diversified portfolio of broadband projects,
Amendment 737 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part III – Point b – introductory part Intervention in the field of broadband shall contribute to smart and inclusive growth through building a balanced and geographically diversified portfolio of broadband projects,
Amendment 738 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part III - Point b - row 2 - paragraph 1 The intervention in the field of broadband Investments in broadband networks networks shall include: capable of achieving the
Amendment 739 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part III - Point b - row 2 - paragraph 1 The intervention in the field of broadband Investments in broadband networks networks shall include: capable of achieving the
Amendment 740 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part III - Point b - row 2 - paragraph 2 The intervention in the field of broadband Investments in broadband networks networks shall include: capable of achieving the
Amendment 741 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part III - Point b - row 2 - paragraph 2 The intervention in the field of broadband Investments in broadband networks networks shall include: capable of achieving the Digital Agenda 2020 target of universal coverage at 30Mbps; or Investments in broadband networks capable of achieving the
Amendment 742 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part III - Point c - row 4 Enabling access to public sector
Amendment 743 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex – Part III - Point c - row 5 Safety and security Shared computing facilities
source: PE-497.891
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/1/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1262/COM_SEC(2011)1262_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1262/COM_SEC(2011)1262_EN.pdf |
docs/5/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CJ05-PR-491110_EN.html
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/19 |
|
docs/20 |
|
docs/21 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/docs |
|
links/National parliaments/url |
Old
http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/dossier.do?code=COD&year=2011&number=0302&appLng=ENNew
https://ipexl.europarl.europa.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/code=COD&year=2011&number=0302&appLng=EN |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1/rapporteur |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2/rapporteur |
|
committees/3 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/2 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3 |
|
docs/3/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.eesc.europa.eu/EESCDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0489)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0489)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/4 |
|
docs/4 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
Old
https://dm.cor.europa.eu/CORDocumentSearch/Pages/redresults.aspx?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0648)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN)New
https://dmsearch.cor.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:0648)(documentyear:2012)(documentlanguage:EN) |
docs/4/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.110
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE492.829&secondRef=03New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/BUDG-AD-492829_EN.html |
docs/7 |
|
docs/7 |
|
docs/7/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE491.329&secondRef=02New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-491329_EN.html |
docs/8 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/8/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.159New
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/JURI-AL-504159_EN.html |
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/11/docs/1 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/docs/0 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/14 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/0/type |
Old
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading/single readingNew
Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading |
events/1 |
|
events/3 |
|
events/3/type |
Old
Vote in committee, 1st reading/single readingNew
Vote in committee, 1st reading |
events/4 |
|
events/5 |
|
events/6 |
|
events/7 |
|
events/8 |
|
events/8/docs |
|
events/9 |
|
events/10 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2/date |
|
committees/3/date |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1262/COM_SEC(2011)1262_EN.pdfNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/sec/2011/1262/COM_SEC(2011)1262_EN.pdf |
docs/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.159&secondRef=01New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&mode=XML&language=EN&reference=PE504.159 |
docs/12/body |
EC
|
events/6/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=REPORT&mode=XML&reference=A7-2013-21&language=ENNew
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-7-2013-0021_EN.html |
events/10/docs/0/url |
Old
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2013-0463New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-7-2013-0463_EN.html |
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16 |
|
activities |
|
commission |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/0 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/1 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/2 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/3 |
|
committees/4 |
|
committees/5 |
|
committees/6 |
|
council |
|
docs |
|
events |
|
other |
|
otherinst |
|
procedure/Mandatory consultation of other institutions |
Economic and Social Committee Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
Old
CJ05/7/09041New
|
procedure/final/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013R1316New
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&lg=EN&numdoc=32013R1316 |
procedure/instrument |
Old
RegulationNew
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure EP 58
|
procedure/legal_basis/0 |
Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament EP 055
|
procedure/other_consulted_institutions |
European Economic and Social Committee European Committee of the Regions
|
procedure/selected_topics |
|
procedure/subject |
Old
New
|
procedure/summary |
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0665:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/celexid |
CELEX:52011PC0665:EN
|
activities/0/docs/0/url |
Old
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=EN&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2011&nu_doc=665New
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2011/0665/COM_COM(2011)0665(COR2)_EN.pdf |
links/European Commission/title |
Old
PreLexNew
EUR-Lex |
procedure/summary/0 |
Amended by
|
activities |
|
committees |
|
links |
|
other |
|
procedure |
|