16 Amendments of Lena KOLARSKA-BOBIŃSKA related to 2011/0302(COD)
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR 10 billion) should be transferred to finance transport projects on the transport core network in the Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund under the Connecting Europe Facilityrespecting national allocations for the projects listed in the Annex of this Regulation. The Commission should support Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund to develop an adequate pipeline of projects in order to give greatest possible priority to the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) transport: EUR 31 694 000 000, out of which EUR 10 000 000 000 shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent in line with this Regulation in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fundfor projects listed in the Annex to this Regulation, respecting the national allocations;
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. Following the mid-term evaluation according to Article 26(1), the Commission may transfer appropriations between the sectors of the allocation set out in paragraph 1, with the exception of the EUR 10 000 000 000 transferred from the Cohesion Fund to finance transport sector projects in the Cohesion Fund eligible Member States.
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 11
Article 11
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
(13) Experience with the current financial framework shows that many Member States, which are eligible to the Cohesion Fund, are facing significant obstacles in delivering on time complex cross-border transport infrastructure projects with a high Union added value. Therefore, in order to improve the delivery of transport projects, in particular cross-border ones, with a high Union added value, part of the Cohesion Fund allocation (EUR 10 billion) should be transferred to finance transport projects on the transport core network in the Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund under the Connecting Europe Facility, respecting national allocations for the projects listed in the Annex of this Regulation. The Commission should support Member States eligible to the Cohesion Fund to develop an adequate pipeline of projects in order to give greatest possible priority to the national allocations under the Cohesion Fund.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 2 – paragraph 1
Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 2 – paragraph 1
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 2 – table 1 – row 2 – column 1
Annex 1 – part 1 - section a – point 2 – table 1 – row 2 – column 1
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 1 - section b – row 27 a (new)
Annex 1 – part 1 - section b – row 27 a (new)
UA border (Lviv) – Lublin – Warzsawa Cross-border Rail upgrading line
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 2 – table a – row 8 a (new)
Annex 1 – part 2 – table a – row 8 a (new)
8a. Oil supply diversification corridors in Central Eastern Europe ("OSC"): Objective Interoperability of the oil pipeline network in Central Eastern Europe to increase security of supply and reduce environmental risks. Member States concerned: Austria, Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12
(12) ‘bottleneck’ means a physical barrier that leads to a system break affecting the continuity of long-distance flows. Such a barrier can be absorbed by new infrastructure such as bridges or tunnels that address problems as for example gradients, curve radii, gauge. The need to upgrade existing infrastructure shall not be considered as a bottleneck;
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) transport: [EUR 31 694 000 000], out of which [EUR 10 000 000 000] shall be transferred from the Cohesion Fund to be spent in line with this Regulation in Member States eligible for funding from the Cohesion Fundfor projects listed in the Annex to this Regulation, respecting the national allocations;
Amendment 624 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Part I – point 2 – introductory part
Annex – Part I – point 2 – introductory part
Amendment 625 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Part I – point 2 – row 2 a (new)
Annex – Part I – point 2 – row 2 a (new)
UA border – Lublin – Rail upgrading existing line, Warszawa – Poznań – studies for extension DE border
Amendment 707 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Part I - Point b - row 28 a (new)
Annex – Part I - Point b - row 28 a (new)
Warszawa - Cross-Border Rail works Lublin - Zamość - BełŜec - Rawa Ruska - UA border (further toward Lviv)
Amendment 709 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Part I – point b – row 28 a (new)
Annex – Part I – point b – row 28 a (new)
Lviv - UA border Cross-border Rail upgrading line - Lublin - Warszawa
Amendment 732 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex – Part II – Point a – point 8 a (new)
Annex – Part II – Point a – point 8 a (new)
Oil supply diversification Interoperability of the oil Austria, Czech Republic, corridors in Central pipeline network in Germany, Hungary, Eastern Europe Central Eastern Europe Poland, Slovakia ("OSC"): to increase security of supply and reduce environmental risks.