BETA

57 Amendments of Bogdan Kazimierz MARCINKIEWICZ related to 2011/0294(COD)

Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 2
(2) The planning, development and operation of trans-European transport networks contribute to the attainment of major Union objectives, such as the full implementation and smooth functioning of the Sinternal mgle European Market and the strengthening of economic and soc, social and territorial cohesion and also have the specific objectives of allowing the seamless and sustainable mobility of persons and goods among Member States and ensuring appropriate accessibility and connectivity for all regions of the Union and contributing to further economic growth and competitiveness in a global perspective.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 4
(4) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion on international transport corridors. In order to ensure the international mobility of goods and passengers, the capacity of the trans- European transport network and the use of this capacity should be optimised and, if necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links within and between Member States as well as neighbouring countries.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 8 a (new)
(8 a) The trans-European transport network should be developed through the creation of new transport infrastructure, revitalisation and upgrading of existing infrastructure and through measures promoting its resource-efficient use.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 11 a (new)
(11 a) Exemptions from the infrastructure requirements for the core network should be possible in duly justified cases.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 19
(19) The guidelines should set priorities in order to achievemake possible the achievement of the objectives within the given time horizon.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 26
(26) In order to implement the core network within the given time horizon, a corridor approach could be used as an instrument to coordinate on a transnational basis different projects and synchronise the development of the corridor, thereby maximising network benefits. The corridor approach should not lead to prioritisation of certain projects over others on the core network.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Core network corridors should also address wider transport policy objectives and facilitate modal integration and multi- modal operations. This should allow specially developed corridors that are optimised in terms of energy use and emissions, thus minimising environmental impacts, and are also attractive for their reliability, limited congestion and low operating and administrative costs. Their management should not, however, result in an excessive growth of administrative costs. An initial list of corridors should be included in the Regulation (EU) XXX/2012 [Connecting Europe Facility], but should be adaptable in order to take account of changes in traffic flows.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 27
(27) Core network corridors shouldmight also address wider transport policy objectives and facilitate modal integration and multi- modal operations. This should allow specially developed corridors that are optimised in terms of energy use and emissions, thus minimising environmental impacts, and are also attractive for their reliability, limited congestion and low operating andeir management should not result in excessive growth of administrative costs. An initial list of corridors should be included in the Regulation (EU) XXX/2012 [Connecting Europe Facility], but should be adaptable in order to take account of changes in traffic flows.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 28
(28) Designing the right governance structure and identifying the sources of financing for complex cross-border projects would be, where appropriate, eased by creating corridor platforms for such core network corridors. European Coordinators should facilitate the coordinated implementation of the core network corridors.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 29
(29) In developingThe core network corridors due account should be given toshould be in line with the rail freight corridors set up in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 of 22 September 2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning a European rail network for competitive freight as well as to the European Deployment Plan for ERTMS provided for in Commission Decision 2009/561/EC of 22 July 2009 amending Decision 2006/679/EC as regards the implementation of the technical specification for interoperability relating to the control-command and signalling subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 187 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 1 – paragraph 4
4. The guidelines provide for measures for the implementation of the trans-European network. The implementation of projects of common interest depends on their degree of maturity, the compliance with national and EU legal procedures and the availability of financial resources, without prejudging the financial commitment of a Member State or the Union.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 213 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q
(q) ‘freight terminal’ means a structure equipped for transhipment between at least two transport modes or between two different rail systems and for temporary storage of freight such as ports, inland ports, airports and rail-road terminals;
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 221 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
(r a) 'revitalisation' means a process resulting in the achievement of the original construction parameters of existing infrastructure facilities with the long term improvement of its quality compared to the current state, in line with the application of the requirements and the provisions of this Regulation;
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r a (new)
(r a) 'border crossing point' means the infrastructure necessary to ensure seamless traffic flow, border checks, border surveillance and other border control procedures;
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point r b (new)
(r b) 'cross border section' means the section which ensures the continuity of a project of common interest between at least two Member States or between a Member State and a neighbouring country;
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 a (new)
(1a) 'alternative clean fuels' mean fuels which substitute conventional motor fuels like gasoline and diesel in the energy supply for transport and contribute to its decarbonisation; they include electricity, hydrogen, biofuels (liquids), synthetic fuels, methane (natural gas and biomethane) and Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG).
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point f
(f) promotion of a broad use of transport with the most carbon neutral effeclow-carbon transport;
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) the broad deployment of new technologies and ITS, where it is economically justified;
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
(i a) mitigating exposure of urban areas to negative effects of rail and road transport;
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 12 – paragraph 3
3. The technical equipment associated with railway lines shallmay include electrification systems, equipment for the boarding and alighting of passengers and the loading and unloading of cargo in stations, logistic platforms and freight terminals. It shallmay include any facility, inter alia automatic gauge changing facilities, necessary to ensure the safe, secure and efficient operation of vehicles and to enhance interoperability.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) railway lines are equipped with ERTMS, following the economic cost- benefit analysis;
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) railway infrastructure complies with the requirements of the technical specification for Interoperability (TSI) adopted pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 2008/57/EC for new and upgraded lines, except in duly justified cases, where allowed by the relevant TSI or under the procedure provided for in Article 9 of Directive 2008/57/EC. In any case, the railway infrastructure shall comply with the following requirements:;
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c
(c) railway infrastructure complies with the requirements of the technical specification for Interoperability (TSI) adopted pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 2008/57/EC for new and upgraded lines, except in duly justified cases,, except where allowed by the relevant TSI or under the procedure provided for in Article 9 of Directive 2008/57/EC. In any case, the railway infrastructure shall comply with the following requirements:;
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1
(1) nominal track gauge for new railway lines: 1 435 mm;deleted
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 –point c – subpoint 1
(1) nominal track gauge for new railway lines: 1 435 mm;deleted
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 2
(2) electrification;deleted
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 3
(3) lines which are used by conventional freight trains: 22,5 t axle load, and 750 m train length;deleted
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 3
(3) lines which are used by conventional freight trains: 22,5 t axle load, and 750 m train length;deleted
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3 – point c – subpoint 4
(4) maximum gradients for new lines which are to be used by conventional freight trains: 12,5 mm/m.deleted
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 13 – paragraph 3–point c – subpoint 4 a (new)
(4 a) the access to freight terminals complies with the requirements provided for in Directive 2001/14/EC.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) achieving standards higher than those set out as minimum requirements in the technical specifications, as described in Article 13meeting the infrastructure requirements and enhancing interoperability.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 3
3. Port-aAssociated equipment shallwith inland waterways may include the equipment for loading and unloading of cargos in inland ports. Associated equipment may enable in particular propulsion and operating systems which reduce pollution, energy consumption and carbon intensity. It and may includes waste reception facilities, as well as equipment for ice breaking, hydrological services and dredging.
2012/10/04
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class IV waterways as laid down in the European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN) on the new classification of inland waterways and ensure continuous bridge clearance. This shall not apply to areas of specific importance to species of flora and fauna, such as near-natural, free-flowing rivers, Natura 2000 sites or candidate sites protected by the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) or the Birds Directive (2009/147/EC). Moreover, this shall be without prejudice to compliance with Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. This should not be interpreted to the detriment of possible future developments of inland waterways in the EU.
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point a
(a) rivers, canals and lakes comply with the minimum requirements for class IVII waterways as laid down in the European Agreement on Main Inland Waterways of International Importance (AGN) on the new classification of inland waterways and ensure continuous bridge clearance.
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 3 – point b
(b) rivers, canals and lakes are equipped with RIS, where applicable.
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) for existing inland waterways: implementing measures necessary to reach the standards of the inland waterways class IVII;
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) where appropriate, achieving higher standards than inland waterways class IVII, to meet market demands;
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) parking and rest areas;
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 475 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)
(b a) A conventional strategic road is a road which is not a motorway or express road, but which is still a high quality road as referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2.
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 532 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 26 – paragraph 1 – point c
(c) Sea canals, port fairways and estuaries connect two seas, or provide access from the sea to maritime ports and correspond at least to inland waterway class VIII.
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 589 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 3
3. The transport infrastructures constituting the core network are indicated in the corresponding maps of the comprehensive network in Annex IWithout prejudice to Articles 1(4), 47(2) and (3), appropriate measures shall be taken for the core network to be developed in order to comply with the provisions of this Chapter by 31 December 2030. In accordance with Article 57, the implementation of the core network shall be evaluated by the Commission by 31 December 2023.
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 597 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
2. The infrastructure of the core network shall meet all the requirements set out in Chapter II without exception. In addition, the following requirements shall also be met by the infrastructure of the core network:
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 609 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1
full electrification of the railway lines;the requirements set out in the Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSI) adopted pursuant to Article 6 of Directive 2008/57/EC, except where allowed by the relevant TSI or under the procedure provided for in Article 9 of Directive 2008/57/EC.
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 614 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2
– lines with regular freight traffic: at least 22.5 t axle load, 100 km/h line speed and 750 m train length;deleted
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 624 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2 a (new)
– without prejudice to Directive 2008/57/EC, at the request of a Member State, as regards railway transport infrastructure, exemptions may be granted by the Commission in duly justified cases as regards the train length, ERTMS, axle load, electrification and line speed;
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 627 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1
demand-based availability of alternative clean fuels;
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 629 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 45 – paragraph 2 – point b – indent 1 a (new)
– inland waterways infrastructure of the core network can be exempted from meeting all the requirements set out in this Article and in Chapter II, if an inland waterway has been classified as a route of international importance in the European Agreement on Main Inland Roads of International Importance (AGN);
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 670 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2 a. In duly justified cases the core network corridor may involve only two countries.
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 671 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 3
3. Core network corridors shallmay include maritime and inland ports, and its accesses, except in duly justified cairports, Motorways of the Sea, rail-road terminals and their accesses.
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 675 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Railway freight corridors set up in Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 as well as the ERTMS corridors should be a part of the core network corridors.
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 677 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 49 – paragraph 3 a (new)
3 a. Wherever appropriate, railway freight corridors set up in Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 as well as the ERTMS corridors should be a part of the core network corridors.
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 687 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 51 – paragraph 1
1. In order to facilitate the coordinated implementation of core network corridors, the Commission shall designate, after consultation with the Member States concerned, and after having consulted the European Parliament, persons called ‘European Coordinator’. Based on the principle of subsidiarity, the European Coordinator shall be designated only for those core network corridors which require special EC assistance in order to ensure timely implementation of the corridor.
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 724 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(a a) The corridor development plan shall take into account the efforts already made by the Member States and the relevant infrastructure managers in implementing Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 as well as the experiences and results of the existing rail freight corridor companies or the entities concerned.
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 734 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 53 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
In order to support the implementation of the core network corridors, the Commission may adopt implementing decisions for core network corridors. These decisions mayThe European Coordinator shall support Member States in implementing the work plan, in particular with regards to:
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 746 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 54 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
The Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 56 concerning the adaptation of Annexes I, II and III to take account of possible changes resulting from the quantitative thresholds laid down in Articles 16, 24, 29 and 33 after prior consultations and with the approval of the Member States concerned. When adapting the Annexes, the Commission shall:
2012/10/08
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 767 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 02/33
To add the Oder Waterway (Ostrava – Opole – Wrocław – Frankfurt am Oder – Szczecin) to the core network.
2012/10/11
Committee: TRAN
Amendment 863 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex I – Volume 14/33
To add the Oder Waterway (Ostrava – Opole – Wrocław – Frankfurt am Oder – Szczecin) to the core network
2012/10/11
Committee: TRAN