5 Amendments of Peter van DALEN related to 2015/2093(INI)
Amendment 11 #
Motion for a resolution
Recital B
Recital B
B. whereas the real inequity is felt by the fishermen as regards the implementation ofway in which fisheries control in Europes performed in Europe as regards methods, duration and frequency;
Amendment 52 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 4 a (new)
Paragraph 4 a (new)
4a. Recalls that, because the landing obligation for fisheries constitutes a fundamental change, the Omnibus Regulation ((EU) No 812/2015) provided for a two-year adaptation period before infringements of the landing obligation will be regarded as serious infringements; calls for that period to be extended if necessary;
Amendment 59 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 6
Paragraph 6
6. Notes that the level of infraction differs from one Member State to another, and that for the same infraction the sanction may be either an administrative or penal one; calls for such differences in sanctions to be reduced; contends that the points-based system could be a European instrument which would serve to impose sanctions for serious infractions, but that without uniformity would aggravate an already inequitable situation;
Amendment 63 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 7
Paragraph 7
7. Recalls that the EFCA ensures the application of common control, inspection and surveillance standards and facilitates operational cooperation between Member States through joint deployment plans; calls for the EFCA to deploy more resources for this task;
Amendment 96 #
Motion for a resolution
Paragraph 14
Paragraph 14
14. Supports the strengthening of cooperation between Member States through exchanges between inspectors and the exchange of control methods, data and risk analysis; stresses that an increase in the number of inspections based on risk analysis could reduce the pressure of inspections on other fishermen;