41 Amendments of Carlo FIDANZA related to 2021/0420(COD)
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 13
Recital 13
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z
Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z
(z) ‘maritime port’ means an area of land and water made up of such infrastructure and equipment so as to permit, principally, the reception of waterborne vessels, their loading and unloading, the storage of goods, the receipt and delivery or further transmission of those goods and the embarkation and disembarkation of passengers, crew and other persons and any other infrastructure necessary for transport operators within the port area;
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 5 – paragraph 3
Article 5 – paragraph 3
3. The environmental assessment of plans and projects shall be carried out in accordance with Council Directive 92/43/EEC49 , Directives 2000/60/EC50 , 2001/42/EC51 , 2002/49/EC52 , 2009/147/EC53 and 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council54 . For the projects of common interest for which the environmental assessment has not yet been carried out at the date of entry into force of this Regulation, it should also include the assessment of the compliance with the “do no significant harm” principle. __________________ 49 Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7). 50 Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ L 327, 22.12.2000, p. 1). 51 Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (OJ L 197, 21.7.2001, p. 30). 52 Directive 2002/49/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 June 2002 relating to the assessment and management of environmental noise (OJ L 189 18.7.2002, p. 12). 53 Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, O. 7). 54 Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 26, 28.1.2012, p. 1).
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 8 – paragraph 5
Article 8 – paragraph 5
5. The Commission may requirecommend Member States by means of an implementing act to establish a single entity for the construction and management of cross-border infrastructure projects of common interest. The relevant European Coordinator shall have the status of observer in the management or supervisory board or in both of that single entity.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 2
Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 2
When constructing or upgrading a passenger line of the extended core network or sections thereof, Member States shall perform a study to analyse the feasibility and economic, where applicable and economically feasible, perform a study to analyse relevance of higher speeds, and build or upgrade the line to such higher speed where its feasibility and economic relevance are demonstrated.
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18
Article 18
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
In the promotion of projects of common interest related to railway infrastructure, and where relevant, in addition to the general priorities set out in Articles 12 and 13, attention shall be given to the following:
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point k a (new)
Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point k a (new)
(k a) dual use infrastructure utilised for activities such as military mobility.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) introduction and promotion of new technologies and innovation for zero and low carbon energy fuels and propulsion systems, including LNG;
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e
Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e
(e) improve the resilience of the logistic chains and, international maritime trade and security of the energy supply, including in relation to climate adaptation;
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point f
Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point f
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point b
Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point b
(b) rest areas are available at a maximum distance of 60 km from each other, providing sufficient parking space, relevant safety and security equipment, and appropriate facilities, including sanitary facilities, that meet the needs of a diverse workforce;
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point c
Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point c
(c) safe and secure parking areas are available at a maximum distance of 100 km from each otherdensity required by the traffic volume, market demand and other relevant factors, providing a sufficient parking space for commercial vehicles and complying with the requirements set out in Article 8(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2020/105469 ; __________________ 69 Regulation (EU) 2020/1054 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 as regards minimum requirements on maximum daily and weekly driving times, minimum breaks and daily and weekly rest periods and Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 as regards positioning by means of tachographs (OJ L 249, 31.7.2020, p. 1).
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) when building or upgrading road infrastructure, ensure the continuity and accessibility ofroad infrastructure is not obstructing pedestrian and cycling paths in order to promote the active modes of transport.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Within twohree years after the entry into force of this Regulation, Member States shall conduct a market and prospective analysis on multimodal freight terminals on their territory. This analysis shall at least:
Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point d
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point d
(d) improve the safety and sustainability of the movement of persons, services and of the transport of goods;
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point i
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point i
(i) introduce dual use technology, security technology and compatible identification standards on the networks;
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 46 – paragraph 2
Article 46 – paragraph 2
2. Projects of common interest for which an environmental impact assessment must be carried out in compliance with Directive 2011/92/UE shall be subject to climate proofing. The climate proofing shall be undertaken based on the latest available best practice and guidance to ensure that transport infrastructures are resilient to the adverse impacts of climate change, through a climate vulnerability and risk assessment, including through relevant adaptation measures, and through integration of the costs of greenhouse gas emissions in the cost- benefit analysis. Such requirement does not apply to projects for which the environmental impact assessment has been completed before entry into force of this Regulation.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Article 47 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part
Member States shall make best effort to ensure that the information notified pursuant to paragraph 1 is made available at least twelve months before the final decision on the implementation of the project of common interest. The information shall in particular include:
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 47 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
Article 47 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1
No later than thirty calendar days, unless agreed otherwise between Member State and the Commission, following the receipt of information pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission may request additional information from the Member State where the project of common interest is planned. Any request for additional information shall be duly justified, limited to information necessary to carry out the assessment pursuant to paragraph 5, proportionate to the purpose of the request and not unduly burdensome for the Member State where the project of common interest is planned.
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 55 – paragraph 3
Article 55 – paragraph 3
Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 58 – paragraph 3
Article 58 – paragraph 3
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 44 a (new)
Recital 44 a (new)
(44a) The useful life of rail equipment, including ERTMS, is around 30 years on average, ensuring a long period of return on investments, which, while slowing down the renewal of equipment, is a major financial consideration when it comes to balancing operational costs and benefits. However, frequent updates to technical interoperability specifications effectively limit the lifespan of the equipment, which cannot be predicted with any certainty by rail transport stakeholders, possibly deterring prospective investors. It is therefore necessary seek a level of regulatory stability that consistently upholds the principle of technological neutrality at least.
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a regulation
Recital 67 a (new)
Recital 67 a (new)
(67a) For the purpose of this structured dialogue and in the absence of any viable logistical and modal transport alternatives, the Commission should discourage Member States from unilaterally creating cross-border barriers of any kind along the network, in particular at central hubs, in order to avoid obstructing border transit.
Amendment 721 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Amendment 933 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) ERTMS is equipped trackside and on board of all trains on all TEN-T networks, while all means of useful cooperation between Member States, Infrastructure Managers and Transport Operators are adopted to ensure the a synchronised and harmonised ERTMS deployment;
Amendment 998 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part
1. Member States shall ensure that, by 31 December 2030, the quality of services provided by infrastructure managers to railway undertakings,on the rail networks, the technical and operational requirements for infrastructure use and procedures related to border controls do not prevent the operational performance of rail freight services along the rail freight lines of the European Transport Corridors from meeting the following target values:
Amendment 1003 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a
(a) for each internal Union cross- border section, the dwelling time of all freight trains crossing the border doesshall not exceed 1530 minutes on average. Dwelling time of a train on a cross-border section means the total additional transit time that can be attributed to the existence of the border crossing, irrespective of the underlying causes, such as police border controls and procedures or considerations of infrastructural, operational, technical and administrative nature, without taking into account the time that cannot be attributed to the border crossing, such as operational procedures carried out in facilities located in the proximity of the border crossing but not intrinsically related to it;
Amendment 1006 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b
Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b
(b) at least 9075% of the freight trains crossing at least one border of a European Transport Corridor arrive at their destination, or at the external Union border if their destination is outside the Union, at their scheduled time or with a delay of less than 30 minutes.
Amendment 1010 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new)
2a. The European Commission, in close cooperation with all the rail stakeholders, shall ensure that a digital capacity management system, which enables passenger and freight operators to book a cross-border train path, will be developed by 31 December 2025. Member States shall fully deploy the system on the rail lines of the European Transport Corridors core and extended core networks by 31 December 2027.
Amendment 1383 #
Proposal for a regulation
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
(aa) ensure suitable conditions for emerging technologies such as automated train services, autonomous vehicles and passenger and freight drones and promote their wider use so as to maintain the EU’s leading position in the field and encourage private and public infrastructural investment in new mobility options, such as urban last mile drones, elevated cycle paths, maglev trains and the Hyperloop, while preserving and promoting the principle of technological neutrality;
Amendment 1710 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 18/23
Annex 1 – part 18/23
Add the following to the core network: - Bussoleno - Avigliana ( ≥ 200 km/h) - Orbassano - Torino S.Paolo ( ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1711 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 18/23
Annex 1 – part 18/23
Add the following to the core network: - Bologna – Ancona ( ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1712 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 18/23
Annex 1 – part 18/23
Add the following to the extended core network: - Ancona – Foggia ( ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1716 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 19/23
Annex 1 – part 19/23
Add the following to the core network: - Bussoleno - Avigliana ( ≥ 200 km/h) - Orbassano - Torino S.Paolo ( ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1717 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 19/23
Annex 1 – part 19/23
Add the following to the core network: - Chiasso - Como San Giovanni
Amendment 1718 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 19/23
Annex 1 – part 19/23
Add the following to the core network: - Bologna – Ancona ( ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1719 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 19/23
Annex 1 – part 19/23
Add the following to the extended core network: - Ancona – Foggia ( ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1720 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 1 – part 19/23
Annex 1 – part 19/23
Add the following to the core network: - La Spezia - Genova - Genova - Ventimiglia
Amendment 1764 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 - table - section IT
Annex 2 - table - section IT
Node name: Modena Rail Road Terminals: Marzaglia Multimodal Terminal
Amendment 1765 #
Proposal for a regulation
Annex 2 - table - section IT
Annex 2 - table - section IT
Node name: Marzaglia Multimodal Terminal (Modena) Urban node: Core