2021/0420(COD) Trans-European transport network
Lead committee dossier:
Progress: Procedure completed
| Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | TRAN |
THALER Barbara ( EPP),
RIQUET Dominique ( Renew)
|
GARCÍA MUÑOZ Isabel ( S&D),
DALUNDE Jakop G. ( Verts/ALE),
ZĪLE Roberts ( ECR),
CAMPOMENOSI Marco ( ID),
KOUNTOURA Elena ( GUE/NGL)
|
| Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
| Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
| Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
| Committee Opinion | IMCO |
DE MEO Salvatore ( EPP)
|
Claudia GAMON ( RE)
|
| Committee Opinion | REGI |
PANZA Alessandro ( ID)
|
Bronis ROPĖ ( Verts/ALE),
Vera TAX ( S&D)
|
Lead committee dossier:
Events
2024/06/28
Final act published in Official Journal
2024/06/13
CSL - Draft final act
Documents
2024/06/13
EP/CSL - Act adopted by Council after Parliament's 1st reading
2024/06/13
CSL - Final act signed
2024/04/24
EP - Decision by Parliament, 1st reading
Details
The European Parliament adopted by 567 votes to 35, with 29 abstentions, a legislative resolution on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 and Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulation (EU) 1315/2013.
The European Parliament’s position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure amends the proposal as follows:
Objectives of the trans-European transport network
The trans-European transport network should demonstrate European added value by contributing to the objectives laid down in the following four categories:
(1) Sustainability through: (i) the promotion of zero and low emission mobility; (ii) a greater use of more sustainable modes of transport, in particular by further developing an interoperable long-distance rail passenger network, including at high speed, and an interoperable rail freight network, a reliable inland waterway and short-sea shipping network for passengers and freight across the Union; (iii) increased environmental protection; (iv) the reduction of negative externalities, including those related to the environment, climate, health, congestion and accidents, for instance by means of eco-incentives schemes;
(2) Cohesion through: (i) accessibility and connectivity of all regions of the Union, paying particular attention to outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions, as well as sparsely populated areas; (ii) the reduction of infrastructure quality gaps, and the promotion of interoperability between digital systems of all transport modes, with adequate network capacity between regions and Member States;
(3) Efficiency through: (i) the removal of infrastructure bottlenecks and the bridging of missing links, both within transport infrastructures and at connecting points between them, within Member States' territories and between them, in particular at cross-border sections, and connecting, where appropriate, to the trans-European transport network in third countries;
(4) Increasing the benefits for its users through: (i) ensuring the accessibility for users and meeting their mobility and transport needs, taking into account in particular the needs of people in situations of vulnerability, including persons with disabilities or reduced mobility and people living in remote regions.
The trans-European transport network should be gradually developed in three steps: (a) the completion of a core network by 31 December 2030; (b) the completion of an extended core network by 31 December 2040; and,
(c) the completion of a comprehensive network by 31 December 2050.
European Transport Corridors
The nine European Transport Corridors specified in the maps set out in Annex III are, namely: (i) Atlantic; (ii) Baltic Sea – Black Sea – Aegean Sea; (iii) Baltic Sea – Adriatic Sea; (iv) Mediterranean; (v) North Sea – Rhine – Mediterranean; (vi) North Sea – Baltic; (vii) Rhine – Danube; (viii) Scandinavian – Mediterranean; (ix) Western Balkans – Eastern Mediterranean.
Transport infrastructure requirements for the comprehensive network
Member States should ensure that, by 31 December 2050, the railway infrastructure of the comprehensive network, except certain connections: (i) is fully electrified as regards line tracks and; and (ii) enables, without special permission, the operation of freight trains with a train length of at least 740 m (including the locomotive or locomotives).
Transport infrastructure requirements for the core network and the extended core network
Member States should ensure that, by 31 December 2040:
- for rail sections linking the multimodal freight terminals of two urban nodes or the multimodal freight terminal of an urban node and a border crossing point, over 75 % of the length of each rail section, is designed for a speed of at least 100 km/h for freight trains on the freight lines of the extended core network;
- for rail sections linking the multimodal passenger hubs of two urban nodes or the multimodal passenger hubs of an urban node and a border crossing point, over 75 % of the length of each rail section is designed for a speed of at least 160 km/h for passenger trains on the passenger lines of the extended core network.
The Rail Freight governance should make all possible efforts to ensure by 31 December 2030, that the dwelling time of freight trains crossing a border between two Member States does not exceed 25 minutes on average and that most trains crossing at least one border of a European Transport Corridor arrive at their destination or at the external Union border at their scheduled time or with a delay of less than 30 minutes.
Member States should, by 31 December 2040, ensure the development of safe and secure parking areas along the roads of the core network and extended core network, or within 3 km driving distance from the nearest exit of the road of the trans-European network, with an average maximum distance of 150 km between two such areas, providing sufficient parking space for commercial vehicles.
Major European airports (processing more than 12 million annual passengers) will be connected to the trans-European railway network.
End cooperation with Russia - focus on Ukraine
Because of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, and the position adopted by Belarus in that conflict, cooperation between the Union and Russia and Belarus in the field of the trans-European transport network policy is neither appropriate or in the interest of the Union. Hence, the trans-European transport network in those two third countries should be discontinued. As a consequence, improved cross-border connections to Russia and Belarus are no longer of high priority on the territory of the Member States.
The new geopolitical context arising from Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine showed how important seamless transport connections are within the Union’s territory and with neighbouring countries.
A railway track gauge different from that of the European standard nominal track gauge of 1 435 mm severely hampers the interoperability of the railway networks across the Union and even impacts the competitiveness of those isolated railway networks. New railway lines of the core network or extended core network should therefore be built in European standard nominal track gauge of 1 435 mm.
Military mobility
EU governments should take into account military needs (weight or size of military transport) when constructing or upgrading infrastructure that overlaps with military transport networks, to ensure the seamless transfer of troops and equipment. Within one year after the entry into force of the rules, the Commission should conduct a study on short-notice large-scale movements across the EU, to facilitate military mobility planning.
Documents
2024/02/14
EP - Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations
Documents
2024/02/09
CSL - Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement
Documents
2024/02/09
EP - Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations
Documents
2023/04/19
EP - Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71)
2023/04/17
EP - Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71)
2023/04/14
EP - Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading
Details
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Barbara THALER (EPP, AT) and Dominique RIQUET (Renew Europe, FR) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 and Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulation (EU) 1315/2013.
The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
Objectives of the trans-European transport network
According to Members, the trans-European transport network should strengthen the social, economic and territorial cohesion of the Union and contribute to the creation of a single European transport area which is sustainable, efficient and resilient and which increases the benefits for its users and supports inclusive growth. It should demonstrate European added value by contributing to:
(a) sustainability through: (i) the contribution to the deployment of decarbonisation technologies, including through alternative fuels infrastructure, and optimisation of synergies; (ii) promotion of active modes infrastructure;
(b) efficiency through: (i) the interoperability of European, national, regional and local transport networks through common European technical and operational rules and standards, technical equipment requirements, staff certification, including such as the use of a single Union-wide language for cross-border rail transport; (ii) optimisation of the capacity of the rail network; (iii) continuous and efficient maintenance programmes ; (iv) greater coordination on infrastructure works between Member State for cross-border projects; (v) eliminating bottle-necks sections, in particular for cross-border links.
Resource-efficient, resilient network and environmental protection
The trans-European transport network should be planned, developed and operated in a resource-efficient way, complying with the applicable Union and national environmental requirements, through: (i) the development and application of common European rules for implementation of common projects especially in cross border sections; (ii) the optimisation of infrastructure integration and interconnection in order to foster multimodality ; (iii) the taking into account of possible synergies with other networks, including active modes, in particular the transEuropean energy or telecommunication networks including the whole electric grid in order to ensure consistency between the recharge infrastructure planning and the respective grid planning; (iv) synergies with the EuroVelo network or network identified in EU Military Requirements for Military Mobility.
Sustainable transport
The report advocated for unified technical and operational standards for each transport mode and stressed that intermodal transport should be primarily done by rail, inland waterways or short-sea shipping, while any initial and/or final legs can be carried out by road. This should translate into fully electrified railways in the core TEN-T network, running with at least of 160 km/h passenger and 100 km/h cargo trains , which could cross internal EU borders in less than 15 minutes by the end of 2030.
Cooperation with third countries
The report noted that the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MMF) 2028-2035, a budget envelope dedicated to “external transport” should be created in the CEF III, in order to increase cooperation with third countries in terms of cross-border projects and infrastructure deployment. That new financial envelope shall be at least 30 % of the amount of the current CEF programme and should be provided under Heading 5 (Security and Defence) and Heading 6 (Neighbourhood and the world) of the MFF.
General priorities for the European Transport Corridors
In the development of the European Transport Corridors, general priority should be given to measures that are necessary for: (i) the deployment of ICT systems on all modes on the network in order to ensure an efficient use of the infrastructure; (ii) the improvement of connections between the trans-European transport network and the infrastructure networks of neighbouring countries, as well as the improvement of trans European transport infrastructure on the territory of neighbouring countries.
Urban nodes requirements
Given the import role played by urban nodes, Members set out provisions to ensure that capacity bottlenecks and insufficient connectivity within urban nodes do not hamper multimodality along the TEN-T, while fully taking into account the divers challenges of each urban node and the principle of subsidiarity.
Lastly, Member States are called on to adopt sustainable urban mobility plans by the end of 2025 to integrate different transport modes, including cycling or active mobility, reduce congestion and improve road safety. This plan should become one of the conditions to get EU funding.
Documents
2023/04/13
EP - Vote in committee, 1st reading
2023/04/13
EP - Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee
2023/03/21
RO_SENATE - Contribution
Documents
2023/03/01
IT_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2023/03/01
IT_CHAMBER - Contribution
Documents
2023/01/25
EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2022/12/05
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2022/12/01
EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2022/11/22
EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2022/11/17
EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2022/11/16
EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2022/11/16
EP - Amendments tabled in committee
Documents
2022/10/11
CofR - Committee of the Regions: opinion
Documents
2022/10/10
EP - Committee draft report
Documents
2022/08/26
EP - PANZA Alessandro (ID) appointed as rapporteur in REGI
2022/07/27
EC - Supplementary legislative basic document
Details
The Commission presented this amended proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 and Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulation (EU) 1315/2013.
As a reminder, Regulation (EU) 1315/2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) sets out a European-wide multimodal network of railways, inland waterways and short-sea shipping routes which are linked to urban nodes, maritime and inland ports, airports and terminals across the European Union. The network provides a solid foundation towards building the arteries that are needed for smooth passenger and freight transport flows in and across Europe.
To help tackle the increasing challenges of climate change and the need for greater resilience of the Union’s transport infrastructure following the crippling effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Commission adopted on 14 December 2021 a legislative proposal which revises the TEN-T Regulation of 2013. However, since the adoption of the revised guidelines, the resilience of the European transport network has been put to the test yet again by the devastating impact of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. This has redefined the geopolitical landscape, bringing to the surface our vulnerability to unforeseen disruptive events beyond the Union’s borders. Its major impacts on global markets, such as global food security, has highlighted the fact that the Union’s internal market and its transport network cannot be viewed in isolation when it comes to shaping Union policy. Better connections with the EU neighbouring partner countries are more than ever needed.
CONTENT: the present amended proposal aims to introduce the following changes to the legislative proposal of 14 December 2021:
- as an immediate response to the requested action communicated in the ‘Solidarity Lanes’ Communication, an extension of four European Transport Corridors to Ukraine and Moldova is proposed, based on the indicative maps of the core network in these two countries. This regards notably an extension of the North-Sea Baltic Corridor via Lviv and Kyiv to Mariupol, the extension of the Baltic-Black-Aegean Sea Corridor to Odesa via Lviv and via Chişinău as well as an extension of the Baltic Sea-Adriatic Sea and the Rhine-Danube Corridors to Lviv;
- in view of the current geopolitical context, an orientation towards and expansion of the trans-European transport network in Russia and Belarus is no longer valid or desirable. It is therefore proposed to remove the indicative maps of the trans European transport network in Russia and Belarus from Annex IV. However, in case of a democratic transition in Belarus building and upgrading the country’s cross border connections with the EU in line with the comprehensive economic plan for a democratic Belarus would be a high priority, including through re-inclusion of the country back in the Regulation;
- improved cross-border connections to Russia and Belarus are no longer of high priority on the territory of EU Member States. Connections currently exist from Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland to these two third countries. To reflect the lesser priority in building and upgrading those ‘last-mile’ connections, it is proposed to downgrade the last miles of all cross-border connections currently on the core network to the comprehensive network for which only a later deadline of implementation of 2050 is provided for;
- lastly, several Member States have a railway network with a different nominal track gauge than the European standard nominal track gauge of 1 435 mm. The countries concerned are Ireland (1 600 mm gauge), Finland (1 524 mm gauge), Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (1 520 mm gauge) and Portugal and Spain (1 668 mm gauge). Such differences in railway track gauge considerably restrict rail interoperability across the European Union as has been demonstrated by the current crisis in Ukraine and its problems in exporting grains by rail due to its different track gauge. It is therefore proposed, for all Member States with a land rail connection with other Member States, to include a requirement to develop all new TEN-T railway lines with a European standard nominal track gauge of 1 435 mm and also to develop a migration plan towards this European standard nominal track gauge for all existing lines of the European Transport Corridors.
Documents
2022/07/14
EP - Committee opinion
Documents
2022/04/28
EP - THALER Barbara (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2022/04/28
EP - RIQUET Dominique (Renew) appointed as rapporteur in TRAN
2022/03/23
ESC - Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report
Documents
2022/03/07
EP - Committee referral announced in Parliament, 1st reading
2022/02/14
EP - DE MEO Salvatore (EPP) appointed as rapporteur in IMCO
2021/12/15
EC - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2021/12/15
EC - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2021/12/15
EC - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2021/12/15
EC - Document attached to the procedure
Documents
2021/12/14
EC - Legislative proposal published
Details
PURPOSE: to revise the trans-European transport network guidelines to align them with the European Green Deal objectives and the climate targets of the EU Climate Law.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the TEN-T is an EU-wide network of rail, inland waterways, short-sea shipping routes, and roads. It connects 424 major cities with ports, airports and railway terminals. Transport emissions represent around 25% of the EU’s total greenhouse gas emissions, and these emissions have increased over recent years. The European Green Deal therefore calls for a 90% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from transport in order for the Union to become a climate-neutral economy by 2050, while working towards the zero-pollution ambition.
The proposed TEN-T revision seeks to build a reliable, seamless and high quality trans-European transport network which ensures sustainable connectivity throughout the European Union without physical gaps, bottlenecks or missing links by 2050. This network will contribute to the good functioning of the internal market, to the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the EU territory and to the European Green Deal objectives. It should be gradually developed in steps, with intermediate deadlines in 2030 and 2040.
CONTENT: the proposed regulation establishes revised guidelines for the development of a trans-European transport network consisting of the comprehensive network and of the core and extended core network, the two latter being established on the basis of the comprehensive network. It identifies: (a) European Transport Corridors of highest strategic importance on the basis of priority sections of the trans-European transport network; (b) projects of common interest and specifies the requirements to be complied with for the development and implementation of the infrastructure of the trans-European transport network.
The main changes made by the proposal compared to the 2013 Regulation concern the following:
- high infrastructure standards for all modes applied throughout the entire network;
- a new intermediary deadline of 2040 to advance the completion of major parts of the network ahead of the 2050 deadline that applies to the wider, comprehensive network;
- stronger synergies between infrastructure planning and the operation of transport services. Examples include higher speeds for train services across the TEN-T network ( 160 kilometres per hour for passenger services and 100 kilometres per hour for freight ), maximum waiting times at borders of 15 minutes for rail freight. Another example is guaranteed good navigation status per river basin on the inland waterways on the TEN-T network;
- requirements for the deployment, across the TEN-T network, of the charging and refuelling infrastructure needed for alternative transport fuels. This would mean sufficient charging capacity for cars, vans and trucks at 60 kilometres distance in each direction by 2025 on the core network and by 2030 for the extended core and comprehensive networks;
- providing safe and secure parking areas for commercial drivers, equipped with alternative fuels infrastructure;
- use of innovative technologies like 5G to further advance the digitalisation of transport infrastructure, further increasing efficiency, and improving the safety, security and resilience of the network;
- increased resilience of the TEN-T network to natural and human-made disasters and efficient and fast deployment of emergency and rescue services, including for persons with disabilities or reduced mobility;
- the requirement for 424 major cities on the TEN-T network to have sustainable urban mobility plans by 2025, to align their mobility developments on the TEN-T network;
- more transhipment hubs and multimodal passenger terminals in cities to facilitate multimodality, in particular for the last mile of a passenger or freight journey;
- connect large airports to rail , where possible high-speed rail;
- making it possible network-wide for lorries to be transported by trains.
Annexes
The proposal revises the annexes to contain detailed maps of the core, extended core and the comprehensive network, lists of transport and urban nodes in the scope of this Regulation as well as the definition of alignment and maps of the European Transport Corridors. It furthermore contains indicative maps for the neighbouring countries .
Budgetary implications
The administrative costs relative to the baseline have been estimated as being moderate. Expressed as present value over 2021-2050, administrative costs for the public authorities have been estimated at EUR 25.4 million (i.e. EUR 15.8 million for the European Commission and EUR 9.6 million for Member States public authorities).
In addition, the largest part of investments is estimated to originate from public funding (national public funds, EU funds) and would amount to EUR 244.2 billion relative to the baseline, expressed as present value over 2021-2050.
Documents
Documents
- Draft final act: 00056/2024/LEX
- Decision by Parliament, 1st reading: T9-0317/2024
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.003
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2024)000889
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.003
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0147/2023
- Contribution: COM(2022)0384
- Contribution: COM(2022)0384
- Contribution: COM(2021)0812
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.577
- Committee opinion: PE736.359
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE739.613
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.715
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.716
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.648
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.702
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR1228/2022
- Committee draft report: PE736.593
- Supplementary legislative basic document: COM(2022)0384
- Committee opinion: PE730.131
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES6389/2021
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2021)0435
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2021)0472
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2021)0473
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2021)0471
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2021)0812
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2021)0435
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0472
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0473
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0471
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES6389/2021
- Committee opinion: PE730.131
- Supplementary legislative basic document: COM(2022)0384
- Committee draft report: PE736.593
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR1228/2022
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.648
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.702
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.716
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.715
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE739.613
- Committee opinion: PE736.359
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.577
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2024)000889
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.003
- Draft final act: 00056/2024/LEX
- Contribution: COM(2022)0384
- Contribution: COM(2022)0384
- Contribution: COM(2021)0812
Activities
- Dominique RIQUET
Plenary Speeches (1)
- Barbara THALER
Plenary Speeches (1)
Votes
A9-0147/2023 – Barbara Thaler, Dominique Riquet – Provisional agreement – Am 549 #
2024/04/24 Outcome: +: 565, -: 37, 0: 29
PPE
NI
The Left| Amendments | Dossier |
| 1980 |
2021/0420(COD)
2022/05/06
IMCO
91 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (i a) improving active modes infrastructure and removing existing barriers for active modes.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (e a) does not constitute a barrier to active modes; at least twice as many safe, accessible and comfortable crossings across the line tracks shall be provided for active modes as for motorised vehicles.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the extended core network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), by 31 December 204
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 2 When constructing or upgrading a passenger line of the extended core network or sections thereof, Member States shall perform a study to analyse the feasibility and economic relevance of higher speeds, and build or upgrade the line to such higher speed where its feasibility and economic relevance are demonstrated. The study shall also take into account the potential impact on passengers during the constructing or upgrading phase.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 2 When constructing or upgrading a passenger line of the extended core network or sections thereof, Member States shall
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 – point b a (new) (b a) Until 31 December 2040, in Member States where no separate lines for rail passenger and rail freight transport are available, as a derogation from Article 15(2), point (d), Member States are considered to enable, without special permission, the operation of freight trains with a train length of at least 740 m (including the locomotive(s)) if at least the following conditions are complied with: (i) on double track lines, at least 50% of the train paths for freight trains per day, and not less than two train paths on average per hour and direction, can be allocated to freight trains with a length of at least 740 m; (ii) on single track lines, at least one train path per two hours and direction can be allocated to freight trains with a length of at least 740 m.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that on the railway infrastructure of the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), by 31 December 204
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped, while ensuring a synchronised and harmonised ERTMS deployment trackside and on board of trains;
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part In the promotion of projects of common interest related to railway infrastructure, and where relevant, in addition to the general priorities set out in Articles 12 and 13, attention shall be given to the following:
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) when building or upgrading railway infrastructure, ensure the continuity and accessibility of pedestrian a
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) providing accessible active modes infrastructure alongside rail lines and within civil engineering structures such as bridges or tunnels.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Member States shall ensure that rivers and canals do not constitute barriers to active modes; at least twice as many safe, accessible and comfortable crossings across the inland waterway shall be provided for active modes as for motorised vehicles.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) providing accessible active modes infrastructure alongside inland waterways and within civil engineering structures such as bridges.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point k a (new) (k a) dual use infrastructure utilised for activities such as military mobility.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) maritime ports of the comprehensive network will be connected with the rail
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) introduction and promotion of new technologies and innovation for zero and low carbon energy fuels and propulsion systems, including LNG;
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) improve the resilience of the logistic chains
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a – point x a (new) (x a) infrastructure for active modes such pedestrian and cycle tracks, bridges or tunnels, including alternative routes for active modes.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (h a) active modes infrastructure is integrated in or provided as an alternative to the road network.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) rest areas are available at a maximum distance of 60 km from each other, providing sufficient parking space, relevant safety and security equipment, and appropriate facilities, including sanitary facilities, that meet the needs of a diverse workforce;
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) safe and secure parking areas are available at
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) active modes infrastructure is integrated in or provided as an alternative to the road;
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new) (d b) the road does not constitute a barrier to active modes; at least twice as many safe, accessible and comfortable crossings across the road shall be provided for active modes as for motorised vehicles; in and next to built-up areas the distance between crossings for active modes shall not exceed 400 m.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. The Commission shall, by 31 December 2025, review and identify the needs for specific road infrastructure adjustments on the core network in order to facilitate the use of European Modular System vehicles.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) mitigation of congestion on existing roads, in particular through improving active modes infrastructure such as cycle highways, intelligent traffic management, including dynamic congestion charges or tolls varied based on the time of day, week or season;
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) when building or upgrading road infrastructure, ensure the continuity and accessibility of pedestrian and cycling
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) when building or upgrading road infrastructure, ensure the
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) providing accessible active modes infrastructure within civil engineering structures such as bridges or tunnels.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Within t
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) adoption and publication of a sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP) in line with Annex V that includes notably measures to integrate the different modes of transport, to promote efficient zero- emission mobility including sustainable and zero-emission urban logistics, to reduce air and noise pollution and that takes long-distance trans-European transport flows into consideration;
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) collection
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii a (new) (ii a) all destinations within the urban node to be safely reachable by active modes of transport;
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) by 31 December 2040: the development of at least one multimodal freight terminal allowing for sufficient transhipment capacity within or in the
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) compliance with the adopted sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs).
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter IV – title Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) improve the safety and sustainability of the movement of persons, services and of the transport of goods;
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) introduce dual use technology, security technology and compatible identification standards on the networks;
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 2 2. Projects of common interest for which an environmental impact assessment must be carried out in compliance with Directive 2011/92/UE
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Member States shall guarantee the continued functioning of supply chains and essential travel along the TEN-T and avoid possible shortages, where necessary through the activation of “Green Lanes” in strict cooperation with the European Coordinators.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall make best effort to ensure that the information notified pursuant to paragraph 1 is made available at least twelve months before the final decision on the implementation of the project of common interest. The information shall in particular include:
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 No later than thirty calendar days, unless agreed otherwise between Member State and the Commission, following the receipt of information pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission may request additional information from the Member State where the project of common interest is planned. Any request for additional information shall be duly justified, limited to information necessary to carry out the assessment pursuant to paragraph 5, proportionate to the purpose of the request and not unduly burdensome for the Member State where the project of common interest is planned.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) any maintenance work that results in a limitation or non-availability of rail infrastructure is managed in accordance with Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/20751a. __________________ 1a Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/2075 of 4 September 2017 replacing Annex VII to Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a single European railway area (OJ L 295, 14.11.2017, p. 69–73)
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 1. Transport infrastructure shall allow seamless mobility and accessibility for all users, in particular
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 Transport infrastructure shall allow seamless mobility and accessibility for all users, in particular people in situations of vulnerability including persons with disabilities or reduced mobility, older persons as well as persons living in outermost regions and other remote, rural, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 a (new) Member States shall carry out ex-ante assessments of the accessibility of infrastructure and of the services connected to it.
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 b (new) The design, construction, maintenance, and upgrade of transport infrastructure shall comply with Annex I and Annex III of Directive (EU) 2019/882, and accessibility requirements laid down in other relevant Union law.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 c (new) Without prejudice to the Connecting Europe Facility, InvestEU, the Recovery and Resilience Facility, Cohesion Policy, European Regional Development Fund, Horizon Europe and other financing instruments established under Union law or by the European Investment Bank, as well as relevant provisions of this Regulation, Member States shall ensure that public investments for the development, maintenance and upgrading of TEN-T infrastructure are not used to create further access barriers for passengers or otherwise contradict the requirements set out in paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of this Article. Member States shall further allocate targeted funds for the purpose of improving accessibility of existing TEN-T infrastructure for all passengers.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) focus on improving accessibility in European transport corridors for all users
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator may consult regional and local authorities, infrastructure managers, transport operators, in particular those which are members of the rail freight governance, the supply industry, transport users, accessibility experts and representatives of civil society in relation to the work plan and its implementation. In addition, the European Coordinator responsible for ERTMS shall closely cooperate with the European Union Agency for Railways and Europe's Rail Joint Undertaking and the European Coordinator for the European Maritime Space with the European Maritime Safety Agency.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new) (f a) an analysis of the future-proofness of the infrastructure for allowing seamless and accessible mobility to all users, in view of demographic changes, including but not limited to ageing demographics and increasing number of persons with reduced mobility, urbanisation, and migration and travel patterns in the Union, and, where appropriate, proposed measures to future- proof accessibility and interoperability of the network and connected service;
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. In case of disputes between Member States, among which unilateral actions resulting into blocking or restricting the free movements of goods and/or services, the responsible European Coordinator should work with the Member States as a mediator in order to promote the activation and management of alternative rail or road routes.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 1. Based on the first work plan of the European Coordinators, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act for each work plan of the cross-border European Transport Corridors and the two horizontal priorities. This implementing act shall set out the priorities for infrastructure and investment planning and for funding.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 4 4. Until full implementation of the measures provided for in the implementing act, the Member States concerned shall communicate to the Commission a
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall inform the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress made in implementing projects of common interest and the investments made for that purpose. This information shall include the yearly transmission of data through the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans-European transport network (TENtec). It shall include technical and financial data concerning projects of common interest on the trans-European transport network, data related to accessibility of the TEN-T infrastructure and passenger services as well as data on the completion and maintenance of the trans-
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall inform the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 3 Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure the quality, completeness, accessibility and consistency of
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 National procedures regarding the involvement and consultation of regional and local authorities
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 3 Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – title Delay in completion of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network or lack of its maintenance
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 1 1. In the event of significant delay in starting or completing work on the core network, extended core network and on the comprehensive network compared to the initial timeline set in implementing acts in accordance with Article 54 or defined in national transport and investment plans or other relevant project documentation or if there is evidence of non-compliance with the maintenance provisions in Article 48, the Commission may ask the Member State or Member States concerned to provide the reasons for the delay or lack of maintenance. Such reasons shall be provided by the Member State or Member States within three months of the request.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 2 2. In case the delayed or non- maintained section concerns a European Transport Corridor, the European Coordinator shall be involved in view of resolving the problem.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Commission may, after considering the reasons provided by the Member State or Member States concerned pursuant to the first subparagraph, adopt a decision addressed to the Member State or Member States concerned, finding that the significant delay in starting or completing the work on the core network, extended
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 In case the delayed or non-maintained section concerns a project supported with Union funds under direct management, a reduction of the amount of the grant and/or an amendment or termination of the grant agreement may be initiated in accordance with the
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Table RAIL ROAD
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 1 1. Goals and objectives: A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) shall have as central goal improving accessibility of the functional urban area and providing high- quality, safe and sustainable low-emission mobility to, through and within the functional urban area. It shall notably support zero-emission mobility and the implementation of an urban transport system which contributes to a better overall performance of the trans-European transport network, in particular through the development of infrastructure for the seamless circulation of zero-emission vehicles as well as of multimodal passenger hubs to facilitate first and last mile connections and of multimodal freight terminals serving urban nodes. A SUMP shall also take into consideration commuter journeys to and from the urban area.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The planning, development and operation of the trans-European transport network should enable sustainable forms of transport, provide for improved multimodal and interoperable transport solutions and for an enhanced intermodal integration of the entire logistic chain, thereby contributing to a smooth functioning of the internal market by creating the arteries that are necessary for smooth passenger and freight transport flows across the Union. In addition, the network should aim at strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion by ensuring accessibility and connectivity for all regions of the Union, including a better connectivity of the outermost regions and other remote, rural, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas. The development of the trans-European transport network should also enable seamless, safe and sustainable mobility of goods and persons in all their diversity, and should contribute to further passenger rights and price transparency as well as economic growth and competitiveness in a global perspective, by establishing interconnections and interoperability between national transport networks in a resource-efficient and sustainable way to the benefit of the passenger.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9 a) Active modes infrastructure should be improved and existing barriers for active modes removed throughout the TEN-T network. Active modes, such as walking and cycling, contribute to the European Union’s climate goals, improve public health, provide economic benefits and alleviate congestion on the road and rail network.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes, the development, maintenance and upgrading of the trans-
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10 a) As signatories to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), the European Union and all Member States are legally obliged to ensure that persons with disabilities have access, on an equal basis with others, to transport and the built environment (Article 9). Acknowledging that millions of persons with disabilities experience barriers to use transport, the European Commission has included the revision of the TEN-T Guidelines in its list of actions under aim 2. “Accessibility – an enabler of rights, autonomy and equality” of the Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030. Finally, with its Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, the EU has committed to “making mobility fair and just for all” (Flagship 9), including by improving accessibility for passengers with disabilities. It notes that transport proposals under the Strategy must be compliant with the Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 a (new) (24 a) The cross-border use of the “European Modular System” is essential to improve the efficiency and environmental impact of the road freight transport and ensure that Union’s sustainability and emission objectives are reached
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) The trans-European transport network should ensure efficient multimodality in order to allow better and more sustainable modal choices to be made for passengers and freight and in order to enable large volumes to be consolidated for transfers over long distances. Multimodal terminals should play a key role to meet this objective. The design and construction of transport infrastructure should comply with the relevant requirements laid down in national law and Union law.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) As an effective single framework
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 60 (60) Publicly accessible recharging infrastructure along the trans-European transport network as defined in Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] should be complemented with requirements on the deployment of recharging infrastructure in multimodal terminals and for multimodal passenger hubs, to provide charging opportunities for long haul trucks when they are being loaded or unloaded or when the driver is taking a rest or for busses in multimodal passenger hubs. In order to ensure free circulation, where the terminals
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) Taking stock of the experience with regard to the crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic25 and in order to avoid traffic disruptions and contingencies in future, Member States should take into account the security and resilience of the transport infrastructure to climate change, natural hazards, human-made disasters and other disruptions affecting the functioning of the Union transport system, when planning infrastructure. To that aim, a permanent and automatic mechanism for activating “Green Lanes” should be established along internal borders of the Trans-European Transport Network. Moreover, the European Transport Corridors should also include important diversionary lines which can be used in case of congestion or other problems on the principal routes. In addition, due to their multimodal nature, one mode can substitute the other in case of emergencies. __________________ 25 Communication on the implementation
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 a (new) (67 a) In the context of the structured dialogue with regional and local authorities and all stakeholders involved, European Coordinators should be able to take measures to discourage any form of unilateral cross-border blockades along the network, and to strengthen TEN-T sanctioning and governance instruments, as to avoid blocking border transit at the core nodes and to ensure the activation and management of alternative rail or road routes.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 70 (70) The technical basis of the maps specifying the trans-European transport network is provided by the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans-European transport network (TENtec). Member States should also provide data on accessibility and maintenance to improve public scrutiny.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z (z) ‘maritime port’ means an area of land and water made up of such infrastructure and equipment so as to permit, principally, the reception of waterborne vessels, their loading and unloading, the storage of goods, the receipt and delivery or further transmission of those goods and the embarkation and disembarkation of
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point an a (new) (an a) ‘European Modular System’ means a combination of existing loading units (modules) in vehicle combinations or road trains which can exceed the length of 18,75 m and gross combined weight of 40,000 kg.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) promotion of zero-emission mobility, including active modes, in line with the relevant Union CO2 reduction targets;
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point vi a (new) (vi a) ensuring seamless travel experience for consumers, including extensive protection of passenger rights and price transparency as well as free competition allowing for a wide choice of services
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) the taking into account of possible synergies with other networks, in particular the trans-European energy or telecommunication networks, or EuroVelo, the European cycle route network;
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. The environmental assessment of plans and projects shall be carried out in accordance with Council Directive 92/43/EEC49 , Directives 2000/60/EC50 , 2001/42/EC51 , 2002/49/EC52 , 2009/147/EC53 and 2011/92/EU of the
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission may require Member States by means of an implementing act to establish a single entity for the construction and management of cross-border infrastructure projects of common interest. The relevant European Coordinator shall have the status of observer in the management or supervisory board or in both of that single entity. If a single unit for construction and management is established of cross- border infrastructure, they should be mandated to promote and monitor accessibility through TEN-T projects.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission may re
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (h a) improve active modes infrastructure and remove existing barriers for active modes.
source: 731.753
2022/07/12
IMCO
124 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The realisation of the trans- European transport network creates the enabling conditions in terms of infrastructure basis allowing to make all transport modes more sustainable, accessible, affordable and inclusive, to make sustainable alternatives widely available in a multimodal transport system and to put in place the right incentives to drive the transition, notably by ensuring a fair transition, in line with the objectives presented in the Council Recommendation (EU) […] of […] on ensuring a fair transition towards climate neutrality.
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) The trans-European transport network should be gradually developed in three steps with the overall aim to realise a multimodal and interoperable European wide network of high quality standards, while ensuring the smooth functioning of the internal market and respecting the overall Union climate neutrality and environmental objectives: the completion of a core network by 2030, of an extended core network by 2040 and of the comprehensive network by 2050.
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 a (new) Particular attention shall be paid by the Member States to the protection of workers during the building phase of infrastructures.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Member States shall ensure the continued functioning of supply chains and essential travel along the TEN-T and avoid possible shortages, where necessary through the activation of "Green Lanes" in strict cooperation with the European Coordinators.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall ensure that the information notified pursuant to paragraph 1 is made available at least
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) any maintenance work that results in a limitation or non availability of rail infrastructure is managed in accordance with Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/20751a. _________________ 1a Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/2075 of 4 September 2017 replacing Annex VII to Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a single European railway area (OJ L 295, 14.11.2017, p. 69-73).
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 1. Transport infrastructure shall allow seamless mobility and accessibility for all users, in particular people in situations of vulnerability including persons with disabilities or reduced mobility as well as persons living in outermost regions and other remote, rural, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 b (new) Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States shall carry out ex ante assessments of the accessibility of infrastructure and of the services connected to it.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) focus on improving accessibility in European transport corridors for all users;
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) focus on improving accessibility in European transport corridors for all users;
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 4 4. The consultative Forum for the horizontal priorities shall be established and chaired by the European Coordinator. The Member States concerned
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The comprehensive network should be sufficiently equipped with alternative fuels infrastructures that are accessible to users in order to ensure that it effectively supports the transition to zero-emission mobility, in line with the milestones set in the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 4 4. The consultative Forum for the horizontal priorities shall be established and chaired by the European Coordinator. The Member States concerned
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator may consult regional and local authorities, infrastructure managers, transport operators, in particular those which are members of the rail freight governance, the supply industry, transport users, accessibility experts and representatives of civil society in relation to the work plan and its implementation. In addition, the European Coordinator responsible for ERTMS shall closely cooperate with the European Union Agency for Railways and Europe's Rail Joint Undertaking and the European Coordinator for the European Maritime Space with the European Maritime Safety Agency.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator may consult regional and local authorities, infrastructure managers, transport
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new) (f a) an analysis of the future proofness of the infrastructure for allowing seamless and accessible mobility to all users, and, where appropriate, proposed measures to future proof accessibility and interoperability of the network and connected service;
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall inform the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress made in implementing projects of common interest and the investments made for that purpose. This information shall include the yearly transmission of data through the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans-European transport network (TENtec). It shall include technical and financial data concerning projects of common interest on the trans-European transport network, data related to accessibility of the TEN-T infrastructure and passenger services, where applicable, as well as data on the completion and maintenance of the trans- European transport network.
Amendment 116 #
3. Member States shall ensure the quality, completeness, accessibility and consistency of the data in the TENtec information system. The national systems and data sources shall allow for an automated data exchange with TENtec.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Subject to the second paragraph of Article 172 TFEU, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 60 to amend Annexes I and II, notably to take account of possible changes resulting from the quantitative thresholds laid down in Articles 20, 24 and 32 or changes in terms of security. When adapting those Annexes, the Commission shall:
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) include new infrastructure and urban nodes in the trans-European transport network if they are considered of high importance to ensure military mobility and food security within the Union;
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 National procedures regarding the involvement and consultation of regional and local authorities
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The core network with a deadline of 2030 and the extended core network with a deadline of 2040 should constitute the foundation of the sustainable multimodal transport network, representing the strategically most important nodes and links of the trans-European transport network, according to traffic needs. They should stimulate the development of the entire comprehensive network and enable Union action to concentrate on those components of the trans-European transport network with the highest European added value, in particular cross- border sections, missing links, multimodal connecting points, freight terminals and major bottlenecks.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 3 Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. When conducting the review process, the Commission shall also evaluate, in consultation with the Member States, the creation of a new southern European Transport Corridor connecting the east and west sides of the Mediterranean sea.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 1 1. Goals and objectives: A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) shall have as central goal improving accessibility of the functional urban area and providing high- quality, safe and sustainable low-emission mobility to, through and within the functional urban area for passengers and freight. It shall notably support zero- emission mobility and the implementation of an urban transport system which contributes to a better overall performance of the trans-European transport network, in particular through the development of infrastructure for the seamless circulation of zero-emission vehicles as well as of multimodal passenger hubs to facilitate first and last mile connections and of multimodal freight terminals serving urban nodes. A SUMP shall also take into consideration commuter journeys to and from the urban area.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 3 3. Integration of the different modes of transport: A SUMP shall promote multimodal transport through the integration of the different modes and measures aimed at facilitating seamless and sustainable mobility. It shall include actions to increase the modal share of the more sustainable forms of transport such as public transport, active mobility, and, as appropriate, air-transport, inland waterway and maritime transport. It shall also include actions to promote zero-emission mobility, in particular with regard to the greening of the urban fleet, to reduce congestion and to improve road safety in particular of
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 6 6. Monitoring and performance indicators: A SUMP shall include objectives, targets and indicators underpinning the current and future performance of the urban transport system, at minimum, on greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access to mobility services, as well as data on air and noise pollution in cities. The implementation of a SUMP shall be monitored using performance indicators. Member States and the relevant authorities shall implement mechanisms to ensure that a SUMP is in line with the provisions of this Annex and of high quality. The SUMP instruments shall also include strategic indicators assessing the economic relevance of multimodal terminals and combined transport solutions to the interests of transport operators, hauliers, businesses and SMEs with the aim of creating favourable conditions for sustainable investments and strategic planning across urban and peripheral areas of high economic importance for the local communities.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 a (new) Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Exemptions from the infrastructure requirements applicable to the core, extended core and comprehensive network should be possible only in duly justified cases and subject to certain conditions. This should include cases where investment cannot be justified, or where there are specific geographic or significant physical constraints, for example in outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions or in sparsely populated areas, or for isolated or partially isolated networks. In the case of sparsely populated areas, exemptions should only be applicable to infrastructures that are situated in areas of origin or destination, and not to infrastructures that are crucial transit points.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26 a) Such exemptions should in no way hamper the rights of accessibility of all transport users to the networks in peripheral areas, and should not undermine services which are vital for business, including SMEs, in urban and industrial areas of hig economic importance.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 (32) In order to establish the trans- European transport network in a coordinated and timely manner, thereby making it possible to maximise network effects, Member States concerned should ensure that appropriate measures are taken to finalise the projects of common interest of the core, the extended core and the comprehensive network by the given deadlines 2030, 2040 and 2050 respectively. To this end, Member States should ensure that there is coherence of the national transport and investment plans with the priorities set out in this Regulation and in the work plans of the European Coordinators. Member States should also make sure that the goals of the national recovery and resilience plans, as well as other national investment plans, complement with the objectives of the trans-European transport network.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) Projects of common interest to develop the trans-European transport network in line with the requirements set out in this Regulation have European added value, as they contribute to a high- quality, interoperable and multimodal European network strenghtening the functioning of the internal market, increasing the sustainability, accessibility, cohesion
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 (35) Member States and other project promoters should ensure that assessments of projects of common interest are carried out efficiently, avoiding unnecessary delays.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) Projects of common interest for which Union funding is sought should be the subject of a socio-economic cost- benefit analysis based on a recognised methodology, taking into account the relevant social, economic, climate-related and environmental benefits and costs as well as the life-cycle approach and the degree of accessibility for all transport users from the early stages of the projects. The analysis of climate-related and environmental costs and benefits should be based on the environmental impact assessment carried out pursuant to Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council21 . _________________ 21 Directive 2011/92/EU of the European
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The planning, development and operation of the trans-European transport network should enable sustainable forms of transport, provide for improved multimodal and interoperable transport solutions and for an enhanced intermodal integration of the entire production chain and the entire logistic chain, thereby contributing to a smooth functioning of the internal market by creating the arteries that are necessary for smooth passenger and freight transport flows across the Union. In addition, the network should aim at strengthening economic, social and
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 (38) Cooperation with third countries, including neighbouring countries, is necessary in order to ensure connection and interoperability between the infrastructure networks of the Union and those countries, in addition to continuous and high-standard accessibility along the networks in such countries. In view of this, where appropriate, the Union should promote projects of common interest with those countries, assessing and ensuring that the objectives and requirements of the trans-
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To achieve transformation of the transport sector into a truly multimodal system of sustainable and smart mobility services, the Union should build a high quality transport network with rail services meeting minimum line speed. Competitive passenger rail has a high potential for the decarbonisation of transport. T
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 a (new) (39 a) In order to achieve such objectives, accessibility of rail services should be increased for passengers, including for persons with disabilities or reduced mobility. Passengers should have a seamless user experience when searching, selecting and buying their railway services. Therefore, sector-based solutions that aim to create a common European platform for the emission of tickets in a multimodal way should be supported. That platform should provide passengers with clear and complete information on their travels, as well as a single ticket for their cross-border trips valid across all Member States.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40)
Amendment 24 #
(42) ERTMS should be deployed in a continuous and synchronised manner not only on the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, including in the urban nodes, but also on access routes to multimodal terminals. This will enable operations with ERTMS only and boost the business case of railway undertakings.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 a (new) (44 a) Given the importance of the deployment of ERTMS to ensure equal and increased access to the traffic routes to all rail freight transport businessess, it is vital that Member States and Union Institutions devote great financial efforts to ensure an accelerated deployment of ERTMS radio based system across the whole rail transport network, along with the retrofit of all types of rolling stock.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) The trans-European transport network should ensure efficient multimodality in order to allow better and more sustainable modal choices to be made for passengers and freight and in order to enable large volumes to be consolidated for transfers over long distances. Multimodal terminals should play a key role to meet this objective. Moreover, their economic relevance to the operations of businesses, including SMEs, and hauliers in connection with the related road and rail stretches, other than urban nodes and areas of high economic importance in central and industrial peripheral areas, should be properly assessed in order to foster greater public and private investments in multimodal terminals and combined transport operations. The design and construction of transport infrastructure should comply with the relevant requirements laid down in national law and Union law.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 a (new) (49 a) When defining the investment strategy on multimodal terminals and combined operations, the authorities and the stakeholders involved should also take due account of the costs of the operations in the terminal which are borne by the carriers and by the terminal owners, with the aim of assessing the requirements of such terminals in terms of innovation, technological upgrades and capacity potential, as well as the related expected impact of innovation investments and public financing on the operations of the transport operators involved.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 (50) Urban nodes play an important role on the trans-European transport network as starting point or final destination ("last mile") for passengers and freight moving on the trans-European transport network and are points of transfer within or between different transport modes. It should be ensured that capacity bottlenecks, in particular for alternative fuels and recharging infrastructures, and an insufficient network connectivity within urban nodes do no longer hamper multimodality and combined transport solutions along the whole trans-European transport network.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) As an effective single framework for tackling urban mobility challenges, urban nodes should develop a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP), which is a long-term, all-encompassing integrated freight and passenger mobility plan for the
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8 a) The planning of new infrastructure, as well as the maintenance and upgrading works of older infrastructures of the trans-European transport network, should take into consideration active mode infrastructures, including walking and cycling infrastructures, in order to avoid disproportionate disruptions and disconnections to short distance paths, to alleviate congestion on the road and rail network and to remove existing barriers. Active mode infrastructures also contribute to the Union's climate goals, improve public health and provide economic benefits.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 a (new) (51 a) The SUMP instruments should also include strategic indicators assessing the economic relevance of multimodal terminals and combined transport solutions to the interests of transport operators, hauliers, businesses and SMEs with the aim of fostering sustainable investments and strategic planning across urban and peripheral areas of high economic importance for the local communities.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 52 (52) Member States should establish a national SUMP support programme aimed at promoting the uptake of SUMPs and improving coordination among regions, cities and towns, as well as among business organisations, SMEs networks and transport companies. It should support regions and urban areas to develop high-quality SUMPs and reinforce monitoring and evaluation of the SUMP implementation through legislative measures, guidance, capacity building, assistance and possibly financial support.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) Multimodal digital mobility services help to enhance the integration of the different transport modes by combining several transport offers into one. Their further development should contribute to nudge behaviours towards the most sustainable modes and connectivity solutions, public transport and active modes such as walking and cycling.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 55 (55) Information and Communication Technology (ICT) systems for transport are necessary in order to provide the basis for optimising traffic and transport operations and traffic safety and improving related services, including the access to networks for citizens and businesses. Information flows in the transport and mobility network should be facilitated, including through the deployment of the Union Mobility Data Space. Information to passengers, including information on ticketing, multimodal connections and reservation systems, should be available.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 57 (57) Adequate planning of the trans- European transport network is required. This also entails the implementation of specific requirements throughout the network in terms of infrastructure, ICT systems, equipment and services, including the requirements for the alternative fuel infrastructure rollout as defined in Regulation (EU) […] of the European Parliament and of the Council [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure]23 . It is therefore necessary to ensure adequate and concerted deployment of such requirements across Europe for each transport mode and for
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 58 (58) The trans-European transport network should provide the basis for the large-scale deployment of new technologies and innovation, such as 5G
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) Taking stock of the experience with regard to the crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic25 and in order to avoid traffic disruptions and contingencies in future, Member States should take into account the security and resilience of the transport infrastructure to climate change, natural hazards, human-made disasters and other disruptions affecting the functioning and the accessibility of the Union transport system, when planning infrastructure. To that aim, a permanent and automatic mechanism for activating "Green Lanes" should be established along internal borders of the Trans- European Transport Network. Moreover, the European Transport Corridors should also include important diversionary lines which can be used in case of congestion or other problems on the principal routes. In addition, due to their multimodal nature, one mode can substitute the other in case of emergencies.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 63 (63) The participation of investment organisations, banks, businesses and undertakings, including those, which are owned or controlled by a natural person of a third country or an undertaking of a third country, including those, which are established in a third country, can accelerate the realisation of the trans- European transport network. However, under specific circumstances, the participation of or contribution by undertakings owned or controlled by a natural person of a third country or an undertaking of a third country to projects of common interest might compromise security and public order in the EU. Without prejudice and in addition to the cooperation mechanism pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/45226 , greater
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 64 (64) While maintenance is and will remain the main responsibility of the Member States,
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 a (new) (67 a) European Coordinators play a crucial role in ensuring that the infrastructure development of the trans- European transport network is carried out in an effective and efficient way by establishing a structured dialogue with regional and local authorities and all stakeholders involved.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes, the development, maintenance and upgrading of the trans-
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 b (new) (67 b) In the context of this structured dialogue, and in the absence of viable logistical and modal alternatives, the European Commission should take measures to deter Member States from engaging in unilateral cross border restrictions along the network and in particular at the central nodes, to avoid hindering cross-border transit of persons, services or goods.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 (71) Taking into account the Union Action Plan on Military Mobility of March 201827 the Commission should assess the need to adapt the trans-European transport network to
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 a (new) Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 b (new) (71 b) The lack of a southern European Transport Corridor connecting the east and west sides of the Mediterranean sea could undermine the objectives of this Regulation and should therefore be addressed in the context of the review provided for by this Regulation.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 c (new) (71 c) The extended and enhanced infrastructure requirements for transport set out in this Regulation require proportionate and sufficient investments and therefore for transport businesses to make proper investment plans by 2050. The short timeframe of the current multiannual financial framework (2021- 2027), including the foreseen end of the Connecting Europe Facility in 2027, will hamper the planning of investments, especially for the rail sector. Therefore, further generations of Connecting Europe Facility programmes should be envisaged to address those needs.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 72 (72) In order to maximise consistency between the guidelines and the programming of the relevant financial instruments available at Union level, trans- European transport network funding should comply with this Regulation and be based, in particular, on Regulation (EU) No 2021/1153 of the European Parliament and of the Council29
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 73 (73) The achievement of the objectives of the trans-European transport network, in particular with regard to the decarbonisation and digitalisation of the transport system in the Union, requires a robust regulatory framework. Ambitious reforms should be implemented by Member States to address the challenges of sustainable transport as identified in the European Semester. The Recovery and Resilience Facility supports both reforms and investments to make transport more sustainable, reduce emissions, improve safety and efficiency. Relevant measures to that effect are included in approved Recovery and Resilience Plans. In light of this, the Commission should ensure adequate alignments between the trans- European transport network and national investment projects, in order to guarantee complete integration and alignment of investments carried out under EU funds and national funds, such as national recovery and resilience plans.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o (o) ‘sustainable urban mobility plan’ (SUMP) means a document for strategic mobility planning, aiming at improving accessibility to and mobility within the functional urban area (including commuting zones) and peripheral industrial centres) for people, businesses and goods;
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point p a (new) (p a) 'costs of the operations in the terminal' means the costs borne by the transport operators at the terminal incurred to carry out such operations;
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z (z) ‘maritime port’ means an area of land and water made up of such infrastructure and equipment so as to permit, principally, the reception of waterborne vessels, their loading and unloading, the storage of goods, the receipt and delivery or further transmission of those goods and the embarkation and disembarkation of passengers, crew and other persons and any other infrastructure necessary for transport operators within the port area;
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10 a) Member States should develop strategies, in consultation with local authorities and businesses, on the infrastructural, logistical and transportation needs of smaller production centres, in order to ensure coherence and synergies betwee the trans- European transport network infrastructures and internal areas with smaller centres of production that are not covered by the trans-European transport network.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The trans-European transport network shall strengthen the social, economic and territorial cohesion of the Union and contribute to the strengthening of the internal market through the creation of a single European transport area which is sustainable, efficient digitalised and resilient and which increases the benefits for all its users, including accessibility, and supports inclusive growth. It shall demonstrate European added value by contributing to the objectives laid down in the following four categories:
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) enabling greater use of more sustainable modes of transport, including by but not limited to further developing a long-distance rail passenger network at high speed and a fully interoperable rail freight network, a reliable inland waterway and short-sea shipping network across the Union;
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) improving the accessibility and connectivity of all regions of the Union, including outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas;
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i a (new) (i a) increased access to the transport infrastructure for SMEs;
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point vii a (new) (vii a) increased connections and sustainable, high quality transport solutions for businesses and SMEs in isolated and peripheral centres of production.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – introductory part (d) increasing the benefits for all its users through:
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point ii a (new) (ii a) ensuring seamless travel experience for users, including extensive protection of passenger rights and price transparency;
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point ii b (new) (ii b) creating opportunities and greater economic benefits to businesses and SMEs, including improving their access to high-quality, intermodal, fast and sustainable freight transport to enable connections between peripheral and isolated centres of production with densely populated areas of high commercial value;
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point v a (new) Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Free access without any discrimination as well as fair competition shall be ensured by Member States and all public and private entities involved in the development of the trans-European transport network. This shall be done in accordance with Union transparency policy decisions.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 b (new) (10 b) In the development of the trans- European transport network, special attention should be given to ensure that access to the market is guaranteed to SMEs.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the optimisation of infrastructure integration and interconnection between urban nodes, bigger cities and peripheral areas;
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the deployment of alternative fuels recharging and refuelling infrastructure easily accessible to users;
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) the taking into account of possible synergies with other networks, including active modes networks, and in particular the trans-European energy or telecommunication networks;
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The comprehensive network shall consist of all existing and planned transport infrastructures of the trans-European transport network as well as measures promoting the efficient and socially and environmentally sustainable use of such infrastructure provided for in Article 5(1).
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission may require Member States by means of an implementing act to establish a single entity for the construction and management of cross-border infrastructure projects of common interest
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) ensuring optimal integration of the transport modes and interoperability between transport modes
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) fostering accessibility to the network for all kind of transport users, including persons with disabilities or reduced mobility and other people in situations of vulnerability;
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new) (c b) ensuring easy and digitalised access to freight transport and shipping services, other than facilitated use of intermodal terminal and facilities to hauliers and all businesses and SMEs in order to promote the use by shippers of sustainable multimodal freight services;
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (i a) seeking synergies across all modes of transport, including active modes, and removing barriers to active mobility when infrastructure is being upgraded;
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the development of a high performance rail passenger network, fully interoperable and at high speed, connecting urban nodes as well as capital and major cities across the Union;
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 c (new) Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part (a) railway lines, both high speed and conventional, including:
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (e a) allows for a sufficient number of safe crossing points for active modes to avoid disproportionate disruption to active mobility, without hampering the quality of the service, especially for high-speed trains;
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) at the request of a Member State, only in duly justified cases, other exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements referred to in paragraph 2. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio- economic cost-benefit analysis that takes into account the need to preserve services which are vital for businessess and SMEs in urban and industrial areas of high economic importance and an assessment of the impact on interoperability and accessibility. An exemption shall comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council58 , be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable. _________________ 58 Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 2 When constructing or upgrading a passenger line of the extended core network or sections thereof, Member States shall, where applicable, perform a study to analyse the feasibility and economic relevance of higher speeds, and build or upgrade the line to such higher speed where its feasibility and economic relevance are demonstrated. The study shall also take into account the potential impact on passengers during the constructing or upgrading phase.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 – point b (b) at the request of a Member State, only in duly justified cases, other exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements referred to in paragraphs 2 to 4. Any exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost- benefit analysis that takes into account the need to preserve services which are vital for businessess and SMEs in urban and industrial areas of high economic importance and an assessment of the impact on
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped, while ensuring a synchronised and harmonised ERTMS deployment trackside and on board of trains;
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) where relevant, mitigating the impact of noise and vibration caused by rail transport, in particular through measures for rolling stock and for infrastructure, including noise protection barriers;
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) when building or upgrading railway infrastructure, ensure the continuity and accessibility of pedestrian a
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) where relevant, developing innovative alternative fuels technologies for railways, such as hydrogen for sections that are exempted from the electrification requirement.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) possible synergies with other modes of transport, including active modes, for the integration of other infrastructures alongside rail lines or within bridges and tunnels.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The interests of regional and local authorities, as well as those of the public concerned by a project of common interest, as well as those of businesses and SMEs, should be appropriately taken into account in the planning and construction phase of projects.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Member States shall, where possible and where proportionate, allow for a sufficient number of safe crossing points for active modes to avoid disproportionate disruption to active mobility.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) possible synergies with other modes of transport, including active modes, for the integration of other infrastructures alongside inland waterways or within bridges.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point k a (new) (k a) dual use infrastructure utilised for civilian and military purposes.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) improve the resilience of the logistic chains and international maritime trade and security of the energy supply, including in relation to climate adaptation;
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a – point x a (new) (x a) infrastructure for active modes such as pedestrian and cycle tracks, bridges or tunnels, including alternative routes for active modes.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) rest areas are available at a maximum distance of 60 km from each other, providing sufficient parking space, relevant safety and security equipment, and appropriate facilities, including sanitary facilities, that meet the needs of a diverse workforce;
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) safe and secure parking areas are available at a maximum distance of 100 km from each other,
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) allows for a sufficient number of safe crossing points for active modes to avoid disproportionate disruption to active mobility;
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) when building or upgrading road infrastructure, ensure the road infrastructure is not obstructing the continuity and accessibility of pedestrian and cycling
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) possible synergies with other modes of transport, including active modes, for the integration of other infrastructures alongside roads or within bridges and tunnels.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The definition of the trans- European transport network should be based on a common and transparent methodology and should represent the highest level of infrastructure planning within the Union. It should be multimodal, that is to say it should include all transport modes and their connections as well as relevant traffic and travel information management systems
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 a (new) The Commission shall, by 31 December 2025, conduct a feasibility study on the potential use of European Modular System vehicles on the road infrastructure for the TEN-T core network.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) improving multimodal interconnections between airports and infrastructure of other transport modes, and between airports and urban nodes where appropriate
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) adoption and publication of a sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP) in line with Annex V that includes notably measures to integrate the different modes of transport, to promote efficient zero- emission mobility including sustainable and zero-emission urban logistics, to reduce air and noise pollution and that takes long-distance trans-European transport flows into consideration;
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) collection and submission to the Commission and publication in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a of urban mobility data per urban node covering at minimum greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access to mobility service, as well as data on air and noise pollution. Thereafter these data shall be submitted
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) by 31 December 2040: the development of at least one multimodal freight terminal allowing for sufficient transhipment capacity within or in the vicinity of the urban node. One terminal may serve more than one urban node, if capacity allows.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) compliance with the adopted sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs).
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter IV – title IV PROVISIONS FOR SMART, ACCESSIBLE AND RESILIENT TRANSPORT
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) improve the safety and sustainability of the movement of persons, services and of the transport of goods;
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) introduce dual use technology, security technology and compatible identification standards on the networks;
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that transport infrastructure provides for safe and secure passenger and freight movements throughout the infrastructure life cycle.
source: 734.383
2022/10/17
REGI
95 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) keeping existing infrastructure operational and improving or maintaining its quality in terms of safety, security, efficiency of the transport system and transport operations, safe and secured parkings, climate and disaster resilience, environmental performance, and the continuity of traffic flows;
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) contributing to transport emission reduction and increased energy security by promoting the use of zero-emission vehicles and vessels and renewable and low-carbon fuels, through the deployment of corresponding alternative, renewables and advanced fuels infrastructure;
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) mitigating exposure of
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the development of a safe and secure road network, with sufficient safe and secured parking and alternative fuel infrastructures;
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) integrating ICT infrastructures, especially e-ticketing, and mobility as a service on all transport modes using core, extended and comprehensive network and their connections with national, regional and local networks;
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) provides for a nominal track gauge for new railway lines of 1435 mm
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a – paragraph 3 When specifying the reference water levels the Commission shall take into account the requirements which are set out in international conventions and in agreements concluded between Member States and relevant stakeholders concerned.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) promoting and developing measures to improve the environmental performance of inland waterway transport and transport infrastructure, including
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) construction, maintenance, or upgrading basic port infrastructure, such as internal basins, quay walls, berths, jetties, docks, dykes, backfills and land reclamation;
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) expansion of the operating capacity inside and outside the port area in strong connection with environment protection and legal conditions for new constructions;
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the roads are designed, built or upgraded and maintained with the
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) introduction of innovative technologies to improve the control of compliance with the Union road transport legal framework, including smart and automated enforcement tools
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall consult local and regional authorities of urban nodes, shippers, transport and logistics operators which operate on their territory. They shall take into account the results of the consultation in their analysis.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) are equipped with at least one refuelling and recharging station as defined in Article 2, point (43), of Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] dedicated to serve heavy-
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) the fulfilment of climate neutrality by 2050 in line with the Union’s objective of climate neutrality in the Union at the latest by 2050 and the goals of the Paris Agreement;
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 2. The urban nodes of the trans- European transport network are listed in Annex II.
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) adoption of a sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP) in line with Annex V that includes notably measures to integrate the different modes of transport, to promote efficient zero-emission mobility including sustainable and zero-emission urban logistics, to reduce air and noise pollution and that takes long-distance trans-European transport flows into consideration, to assess in terms of costs and benefits the accessibility and affordability for users of different modes of transport;
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) adoption of a sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP) in line with Annex V that includes notably measures to integrate the different modes of transport, to promote efficient zero-emission mobility including sustainable and zero-emission urban logistics, to reduce air and noise pollution and that takes long-distance
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i (i) for passenger transport: sustainable, seamless and safe interconnection between rail, road, air, the active modes of transport, public transport, and, as appropriate, inland waterway and maritime infrastructure;
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii (iii) for freight transport: sustainable, seamless and safe interconnection between rail, road, and, as appropriate, inland waterway, air and maritime infrastructure as well as appropriate connections with logistics platforms and facilities, as well safe and secure parking areas;
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) support for modal shift in cities by putting active mobility and public transport at the core of the next EU framework for urban mobility;
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) promotion of efficient and low- noise zero emission transport and mobility, including greening public and private urban fleets;
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) increase of accessibility and connectivity between urban, peri-urban and rural areas and unhindered access to smart, sustainable and affordable transport;
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – point d b (new) (d b) creation of cohesion between long- distance, regional, and local traffic through connecting nodes, stimulating new innovative technologies as well as by lowering emissions (pollutant and GHG) and minimising external cost;
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) support and promote the decarbonisation of transport through transition to zero - and low-emission vehicles, vessels and aircraft and other innovative and sustainable transport and network technologies such as: automated trains, autonomous vehicles, drones, maglev trains and hyperloop;
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) improve the operation, management, accessibility, interoperability,
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that transport infrastructure provides for safe and secure passenger and freight movements by implementing proper, qualitative and on time maintenance plans during the entire life-time of transport infrastructure.
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States shall ensure the continuity of logistics supply chains through the TEN-T network, avoiding possible disruptions and slowdowns and making use of ‘green lines’ where necessary, as well as the services offered by the European Coordinators.
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 4 – point a a (new) (aa) In the event of disputes between Member States, including those regarding unilateral national measures blocking or restricting the free movement of persons, goods or services, the Member States involved shall inform the Commission of the problem and the Commission shall call on those Member States to find a swift and workable solution to restore free movement through the TEN-T core network corridors;
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 4 – point a b (new) (ab) In the event of failure to resolve the disputes referred to in paragraph 4a within six months from the date of notification thereof, the Commission shall take measures to dissuade Member States from taking unilateral action along the corridors of the TEN-T core network, particularly on cross-border sections where the transit of persons, goods and services would be restricted;
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 1 The provisions relating to railways, and in particular any requirement to connect airports and ports to railways as well as the provisions related to safe and secure parking and multimodal freight terminals shall not apply to Cyprus
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 1 1. Goals and objectives: A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) shall have as central goal improving accessibility of the functional urban area and providing high- quality, safe and sustainable low-emission mobility to, through and within the functional urban area; while meeting current and future challenges and providing smart, efficient, and sustainable transport. It shall notably support zero- emission mobility and the implementation of an urban transport system which contributes to a better overall performance of the trans-European transport network, in particular through the development of infrastructure for the seamless circulation of zero-emission vehicles as well as of multimodal passenger hubs to facilitate first and last mile connections and of multimodal freight terminals serving urban nodes.
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 2 2. Long-term vision and short-term implementation plan: A SUMP shall include a – or be linked to an existing – long term strategy for the future development of transport infrastructure and multi-modal services. It shall also include a delivery plan for the short-term implementation of the strategy. It shall be embedded into an integrated approach for sustainable development of the urban area and linked to relevant land-use and spatial
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 3 3. Integration of the different modes of transport: A SUMP shall promote multimodal transport through the integration of the different modes and measures aimed at facilitating seamless and sustainable mobility. It shall include actions to increase the modal share of the more sustainable forms of transport such as public transport, active mobility, and, as appropriate, inland waterway and maritime transport. It shall also include actions to promote zero-emission mobility, in particular with regard to the greening of the urban fleet, to reduce congestion and to improve road safety in particular of vulnerable road users. It shall stress the social dimension, in which fair and safe working conditions of transport workers need to be taken into account when drafting, implementing and assessing SUMPs.
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 4 4. Effective functioning of TEN-T: A SUMP should duly take into account the impact of various urban measures on the traffic flows, both passenger and freight, on the trans-European transport network with the aim to ensure seamless transit, bypass, or interconnection through and around the urban nodes, including of zero- emission vehicles. It shall provide financial and technical support for cities qualifying as urban nodes to help them comply with future obligations attached to their new status. It shall in particular include actions to alleviate congestion, improve road safety and remove bottlenecks affecting the traffic flows on the TEN-T. In return TEN-T measures shall take into account effects on regional and local traffic flows, both for passengers and freight.
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 5 5. Participatory approach: The development and implementation of a SUMP shall be based on an integrated approach with a high level of cooperation, coordination and consultation between the different levels of government and relevant authorities. Citizens as well as representatives of civil society and economic actors shall also be involved. It shall support the creation of a multi-level collaboration platform at the national level to identify and address shortcomings in rural-urban connectivity covering the functional urban areas and assess the possibilities offered by regional mobility plans.
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 2 (2) Transport emissions represent around 25% of the Union’s total greenhouse gas emissions, and these emissions have increased over recent years. The European Green Deal therefore calls for a 90% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from transport in order for the Union to become a climate-neutral economy by 2050, while working towards the zero-pollution ambition14 . Delivering on the Green Deal should ensure quality job creation and social progress for all. To be socially acceptable, the climate ambition proposed in this regulation should be matched by an equivalent social ambition, in line with the European Pillar of Social Rights. The European Green Deal agenda should be an opportunity to maintain and create quality jobs, promote decent work, raise labour standards, strengthen social dialogue and collective bargaining, tackle discriminations at work, promote gender equality, and workplace democracy. _________________ 14 Commission Communication “Pathway
Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 (3) The Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy15 sets out milestones to show the European transport system’s path towards achieving the objectives of a sustainable, smart and resilient mobility. It envisages that rail freight traffic should increase its market share by 50% by 2030 and double by 2050; transport by inland waterways and short sea shipping should increase its market share by 25% by 2030 and by 50% by 2050; traffic on high-speed rail should double by 2030 and triple by 2050; at least 30 million zero-emission cars and 80,000 zero-emission trucks should be in operation on Union roads by 2030, and nearly all cars, vans and buses and new heavy-duty vehicles should be
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The realisation of the trans- European transport network creates the
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The realisation of the trans- European transport network creates the enabling conditions in terms of infrastructure basis allowing to make all transport modes more integrated, sustainable, affordable and inclusive, to make sustainable alternatives widely available in a multimodal transport system and to put in place the right incentives to drive the transition, notably by ensuring a fair transition, in line with the objectives presented in the Council Recommendation (EU) […] of […] on ensuring a fair transition towards climate neutrality.
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The planning, development and operation of the trans-European transport network should enable sustainable forms of transport, provide for improved multimodal and interoperable transport solutions and for an enhanced intermodal integration of the entire logistic chain, thereby contributing to a smooth functioning of the internal market by creating the arteries that are necessary for smooth passenger and freight transport flows across the Union. In addition, the network should aim at strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion by ensuring accessibility and connectivity for all regions of the Union, including a better connectivity of the outermost regions and other remote, rural, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas. The development of the trans-European transport network should also enable seamless, safe and sustainable mobility of goods and persons in all their diversity, and should contribute to further economic growth and competitiveness in a global perspective, by establishing interconnections and interoperability between national transport networks in a resource-efficient and sustainable way. A modal shift is necessary if the EU wants to reach its target of climate neutrality by 2050.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The planning, development and operation of the trans-European transport network should enable sustainable forms of transport, provide for improved multimodal and interoperable transport solutions and for an enhanced intermodal integration of the entire logistic chain, thereby contributing to a smooth functioning of the internal market by creating the arteries that are necessary for smooth passenger and freight transport flows across the Union. In addition, the network should aim at strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion by ensuring accessibility and connectivity for all regions of the Union, including a better connectivity of the outermost regions and other remote, rural, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas. The development of the trans-European transport network should also enable seamless, safe and sustainable mobility of
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion in international transport and accidents. In order to ensure the international mobility of passengers and
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The trans-European transport network consists to a large extent of existing infrastructure. In order to fully achieve the objectives of the new trans- European transport network policy, uniform requirements and clear standards regarding the infrastructure
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) In the implementation of projects of common interest, due consideration should be given to the particular circumstances of the individual project concerned. Where possible, synergies with other policies
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 11 (11) When planning, procuring and implementing projects of common interest, Member States and other project promoters should give due consideration to Directive (EU) 2021/1187 of the European Parliament and the Council16, in addition to Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on public procurement. _________________ 16 Directive (EU) 2021/1187 of the
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) During infrastructure planning, Member States and other project promoters should give due consideration to the risk assessments and adaptation measures and all their cost-benefit analysis outcomes, that seek to improve resilience, for example to climate change, natural hazards and human-made disasters. By providing further incentives to develop sustainable forms of transport and with the implementation of high-level standards for green transport infrastructure, the realisation of the trans-European transport network will support the “do no significant harm” principle.
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Infrastructure projects under the TEN-T Regulation should be resilient to the potential adverse impacts of climate change through a climate vulnerability and risk assessment, including through relevant adaptation measures. Projects for which an environmental impact assessment must
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The interests of regional and local authorities, as well as those of the public concerned by a project of common interest, should be appropriately taken into account in the planning and construction phase of projects. By giving local authorities a voice in how transport projects are implemented at the level of urban nodes, the transport infrastructure located at the urban node level can absorb transport demand better.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The interests of regional and local authorities, as well as those of the public concerned by a project of common interest,
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 19 (19) Next to the deadlines of 2030 and 2050 that have already been introduced under Regulation (EU) 1315/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council19 , an intermediary deadline of 2040 for the compliance of the network with this Regulation should be added for the extended core network that is part of the European Transport Corridors. The same intermediary deadline should also apply for new standards on the core network that have been introduced in addition to the requirements in Regulation (EU) 1315/2013 as to allow for the necessary investments in due time. Incentives should be set to ensure the completion of the 2030, 2040 and 2050 targets. _________________ 19 Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 of the
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The comprehensive network should be sufficiently equipped with alternative, renewable and advanced fuels infrastructure in order to ensure that it effectively supports the transition to zero- emission mobility, in line with the milestones set in the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy. At the same time, safe and secured parking networks providing comprehensive services should be extended and financially supported by Union funds.
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The comprehensive network should be sufficiently equipped with alternative fuels infrastructure in order to ensure that it effectively supports the transition to zero- emission mobility, in line with the milestones set in
Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The core network has been
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The core network has been identified on the basis of an objective planning methodology. That methodology has identified the most important urban nodes, ports and airports, as well as border crossing points.
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The core network with a deadline of 2030 and the extended core network with a deadline of 2040 should constitute the foundation of the sustainable multimodal transport network, representing the strategically most important nodes and links of the trans-European transport network, according to traffic needs. They should stimulate the development of the entire comprehensive network and enable Union action to concentrate on those components of the trans-European transport network with the highest European added value, in particular cross- border sections, missing links, multimodal connecting points and major bottlenecks. To this end, integrated management structures, such as European territorial cooperation groupings, should be encouraged in order to help speed up the completion of cross-border TEN-T sections.
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 a (new) (25 a) The TEN-T network should fully take into account the diversity of challenges facing EU regions including geographic or significant physical constraints, for example in outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions or in sparsely populated areas, or for isolated or partially isolated networks. All regions should be included in the whole core network, extended core network and comprehensive network to ensure the territorial cohesion of our Union.
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Exemptions from the infrastructure requirements applicable to the core, extended core and comprehensive network should be possible only in duly justified cases and subject to certain conditions.
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) The land-side infrastructure network, established through the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, should integrate
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 a (new) (35 a) All Member States should prioritize projects of common interests on the TEN-T in terms of financial support, simplified public acquisition procedures, building permit, timeframe for appeals, short terms for payments, clear controlling and monitoring procedures.
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) Projects of common interest for which Union funding is sought should be the subject of a socio-economic cost- benefit analysis based on a recognised methodology, taking into account the relevant social, economic, climate-related and environmental benefits, territorial balance and costs as
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 (38) Cooperation with third countries, including neighbouring countries, is necessary in order to ensure connection and interoperability between the infrastructure networks of the Union and those countries. In view of this, where appropriate, the Union should promote projects of common interest with those countries, assessing and ensuring that the objectives and requirements of the trans- European transport network are complied with in order to ensure the interoperability of the Union network, in the same avoiding its usage for illegal migration.
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 a (new) (38 a) An extension of The European Transport Corridors should be realised into Republic of Moldova and Ukraine in a stable and secured geopolitical context, while assuring adequate financial support.
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 (47) Short sea shipping can make a substantial contribution to the decarbonisation of transport by carrying more freight and passengers. The European Maritime Space should be promoted by creating or upgrading short-sea shipping routes and by developing maritime ports and their hinterland connections as to provide an efficient and sustainable integration with other modes of transport, ensuring facilities, exemptions and incentives to offset the absence of other transport alternatives.
Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 a (new) (47 a) The Rhine-Main-Danube river transport corridor, which will link the port of Constanta to the port of Rotterdam and the Black Sea to the North Sea, should become a financing and execution priority for the Union and the Member States together with all intermodal connections, land and port, civil and economic, required throughout the navigation channel.
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 a (new) (50 a) When determining urban nodes special attention should be paid to supporting functional urban areas due to their importance in triggering cooperation between local authorities and partners across administrative borders as well strengthening urban-rural linkages furthermore, special attention should be paid to traffic density in order to improve the connectivity between urban nodes and the surrounding rural/suburban areas and ensure a more balanced territorial approach.
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 a (new) (50 a) Urban Nodes should involve European cities in the governance of TEN-T to reduce bottlenecks at city level Supports all efforts to make Urban cities accessible. Member States should take swift and ambitious action to make cities more inclusive, taking into account all valuable nodes, and thus to accelerate the progress towards the2030 and 2050 objectives for completion of the core and comprehensive network.
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 52 (52) Member States should establish a national SUMP support programme aimed at promoting the uptake of SUMPs and improving coordination among regions, cities and towns. It should support regions and urban areas to develop high-quality SUMPs and reinforce monitoring and evaluation of the SUMP implementation through legislative measures, guidance, capacity building, assistance and possibly financial support. the Commission should extend the current list of urban nodes to include additional cities located on the TEN-T corridors and to provide more technical and financial support to help new urban nodes create and update their SUMPs. Local authorities' involvement in the governance of TEN-T corridors and the definition of relevant criteria to assess SUMPs could be improved through the creation of collaboration mechanisms.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 52 (52) Member States should establish a national SUMP support programme aimed at promoting the uptake of SUMPs and improving coordination among regions, cities and towns. It should support regions, cities and urban functional areas to develop high-quality SUMPs and reinforce monitoring and evaluation of the SUMP implementation through legislative measures, guidance, capacity building, assistance and possibly financial support.
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 53 (53) The Mission on Climate-neutral and Smart Cities, set up under the Horizon Europe framework programme, aims to have 100 climate neutral cities in the Union by 2030. The cities involved in the Mission will act as experimentation and innovation hubs for others to follow by 2050. Being so well received all across EU, a new Mission on Climate-neutral and Smart Cities should be launched, under the same programme, with new cities and a more generous budget.
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 53 (53) The Mission on Climate-neutral and Smart Cities, set up under the Horizon Europe framework programme, aims to have 100 climate neutral cities in the Union by 2030. The Commission should provide the necessary tools for cities to continue influencing transport behaviours in favour of more sustainable urban mobility. The cities involved in the Mission will act as experimentation and innovation hubs for others to follow by 2050.
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) Multimodal digital mobility services help to enhance the integration of the different transport modes by combining several transport offers into one. Their further development should contribute to nudge behaviours towards the most sustainable modes, public transport and active modes such as walking and cycling. Urban infrastructure planning should be developed in accordance with EU standards on road safety, including safety standards for cycling and walking infrastructure and other active means of transport (such as pedestrian and cycling tracks, lanes, bridges, tunnels, parking areas and fast recharging points for light means of transport batteries) to increase the shift to more sustainable means of transport.
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) Multimodal digital mobility services help to enhance the integration of the different transport modes by combining several transport offers into one. Their further development should contribute where possible to nudge behaviours towards the most sustainable modes, public transport and active modes such as walking and cycling.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 58 (58) The trans-European transport network should provide the basis for the large-scale deployment of new technologies and innovation, such as digital and 5G infrastructure and internet of things, which can help enhance the overall efficiency of the European transport sector and capacity to enable secure passenger flows using efficient means, make public or greener transport means more attractive for passengers, and reduce its carbon footprint. This will contribute towards the objectives of the European Green Deal and at the same time contribute to the objective of increasing energy security for the Union. In order to achieve those objectives, the availability of
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 59 (59) A sufficient number of fast recharging points for light and heavy-duty vehicles accessible to the public should be deployed across the trans-European transport network. This aim should ensure full cross-border connectivity and allow electric vehicles to circulate throughout the Union. Distance-based targets for the trans- European transport network as defined in Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] are to ensure a
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 59 a (new) (59 a) Strong and intelligent power supply networks should be supported to enable fast charging stations on the TEN- T corridors.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) Taking stock of the experience with regard to the crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic25 and in order to avoid traffic disruptions and contingencies in future, Member States should take into account the security and resilience of the transport infrastructure to climate change, natural hazards, human-made disasters and other disruptions affecting the functioning of the Union transport system, when planning infrastructure. The European Commission should set up a permanent and automatic 'green lane' activation mechanism along the internal borders of the trans-European transport network, calling on the Member States and regions concerned to constantly identify priority transit points that are not subject to any restrictions. To that aim, the European Transport Corridors should also include important diversionary lines which can be used in case of congestion or other problems on the principal routes. In addition, due to their multimodal nature, one mode can substitute the other in case of emergencies. _________________ 25 Communication on the implementation
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) Taking stock of the experience with regard to the crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic25 and in order to avoid traffic disruptions and contingencies in future, Member States should take into account the security and resilience of the transport infrastructure to climate change, natural hazards, human-made disasters and other disruptions affecting the functioning of the Union transport system, when planning infrastructure, highlighting the challenges and best practices in urban mobility that emerged during the pandemic. To that aim, the European Transport Corridors should also include important diversionary lines which can be used in case of congestion or other problems on the principal routes. In addition, due to their multimodal nature, one mode can substitute the other in case of emergencies. _________________ 25 Communication on the implementation
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 63 (63) The participation of undertakings, including those, which are owned or controlled by a natural person of a third country or an undertaking of a third country, including those, which are established in a third country, can accelerate the realisation of the trans- European transport network. However, under specific circumstances, the participation of or contribution by undertakings owned or controlled by a natural person of a third country or an undertaking from a third country or with the public or state participation of a third country to projects of common interest might compromise security and public order in the EU. Without prejudice and in addition to the cooperation mechanism pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/45226, greater awareness of such participation or contribution is necessary to allow intervention of public authorities if it appears that they are likely to affect security or public order in the Union and the participation or contribution does not fall under the scope of Regulation (EU) 2019/452. _________________ 26 Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 66 (66) European Transport Corridors should help to develop the infrastructure of the trans-European transport network in such a way as to address bottlenecks, en
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 a (new) (67a) For the purpose of this coordinated approach and in the absence of viable logistical and modal alternatives, the European Commission should discourage Member States from creating unilateral cross-border barriers of any kind along the network, in particular at central hubs, in order to avoid obstructing border transit.
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 73 (73) The achievement of the objectives of the trans-European transport network, in particular with regard to the decarbonisation and digitalisation of the transport system in the Union, requires a robust regulatory framework. Ambitious reforms should be implemented by Member States to address the challenges of sustainable transport as identified in the European Semester. The Recovery and Resilience Facility supports both reforms and investments to make transport more sustainable, reduce emissions, improve safety and efficiency. Financial and non- financial support instruments, such as a dedicated budget under the Connecting Europe Facility to support local and regional authorities to meet the new requirements applicable to urban nodes, are needed. Relevant measures to that effect are included in approved Recovery and Resilience Plans.
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'urban node' means an urban area where elements of the transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network, such as ports including passenger terminals, airports, railway stations, bus terminals, logistic platforms and facilities and freight terminals, located in and around the urban area, including their functional urban areas, are connected with other elements of that infrastructure and with the infrastructure for regional and local traffic;
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'urban node' means a
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) 'isolated network' means the rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge different from that of the European standard nominal track gauge (1435 mm), for which certain major infrastructure investments cannot be justified
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point ii (ii) reduction of infrastructure
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point vi a (new) (via) ensuring adequate infrastructures for access to cross-border sections;
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point vi b (new) (vib) ensuring better freight transport connectivity between isolated production locations and densely populated areas in order to encourage efficient logistics and the reduction of transport and distribution times;
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the optimisation of infrastructure integration and interconnection, both at European level and with third countries, and for cross-border and transit connections;
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (b a) deployment of safe and secured parking facilities and comprehensive services for drivers and travellers;
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 3 3. The core and extended core network shall consist of those parts of the trans-European transport network which shall be developed as a matter of priority for achieving the objectives for the development of the trans-European transport network. The Member States will interlink the core and extended networks with the national, regional and local mobility networks.
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 3. A project of common interest encompasses its entire cycle, including feasibility studies and permission
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission may require Member States by means of an implementing act to establish a single entity for the construction
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) promote the extension of the trans- European transport network policy into third countries; a dedicated budget envelope with minimum 30 % in appropriations shall be assigned in the next Multiannual Financial Framework to external transport CEF in order to increase cooperation with third countries;
source: 737.251
2022/11/16
TRAN
611 amendments...
Amendment 215 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 6 a (new) – having regard to the Commission staff working document of 19 June 2019 entitled ‘EU Road Safety Policy Framework 2021-2030 – Next steps towards “Vision Zero”’ (SWD(2019)0283),
Amendment 216 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 6 b (new) – having regard to the Directive on Energy Efficiency (2018/2002),
Amendment 217 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 6 c (new) – having regard to the Commission communication of 9 December 2020 entitled ‘Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy – putting European transport on track for the future’ (COM(2020)0789),
Amendment 218 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 6 d (new) – having regard to the Green Rail investment Platform launched by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in December 2021 to support public and private investments in rail projects,
Amendment 219 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 6 e (new) – having regard to the High-Speed Rail Atlas issued by International Union of Railways (UIC) in 2021,
Amendment 220 #
Proposal for a regulation Citation 6 f (new) (3a) Rail passenger services should become a more attractive option for longer-distance journeys and rail high- speed services have proven in many European countries their attractiveness. The European distances are particularly suitable to this mode of transport and most EU Capitals, major cities and metropolitan areas could be interconnected thanks to high speed. However, the current European network is fragmented and mainly made up of “national high-speed islands” and there is an urgent need to develop an EU High- Speed Network with a larger number of connections between all EU Capitals, major cities and metropolitan areas. This is vital to reach the objective of the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy. The advantages of high-speed rail versus other transport modes are as follows: 1. transport capacity: high-capacity transport capable of covering long distances, 2. energy consumption: extremely low energy consumption per passenger, 3. emissions: extremely low emission footprint in case of electric traction, 4. infrastructure spatial requirements: significantly lower space demand (per transported volume), 5. travel comfort: being able to provide a very high standard, 6. Safety: high-speed rail is one of the safest modes to travel.
Amendment 222 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The freight modal shift is a crucial pillar of the Green Deal and corresponding Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, also in maritime and inland ports this is of importance and these should increase their modal split shares towards more sustainable modes such as rail and inland waterways. However, ports are complex areas in which rail infrastructure is managed differently across Member States in terms of governing bodies. A common EU language on ‘port rail networks’ can help to allow ports to deliver on modal shift ambition.
Amendment 223 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 3 a (new) (3a) The European Union has committed to improving and ensuring the access to transport for passengers with disabilities within the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, and as signatories of the United Nations convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD).
Amendment 224 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The realisation of the trans- European transport network creates the enabling conditions in terms of infrastructure basis allowing to make all transport modes more sustainable, affordable and inclusive, to make sustainable a
Amendment 225 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The realisation of the trans- European transport network creates the enabling conditions in terms of infrastructure basis
Amendment 226 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The realisation of the trans- European transport network creates the enabling conditions in terms of infrastructure basis allowing to make all transport modes more sustainable, affordable and inclusive in all of the EU´s regions, to make sustainable alternatives widely available in a multimodal transport system and to put in place the right incentives to drive the transition, notably by ensuring a fair transition, in line with the objectives presented in the Council Recommendation (EU) […] of […] on ensuring a fair transition towards climate neutrality.
Amendment 227 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The realisation of the trans- European transport network creates the enabling conditions in terms of infrastructure basis allowing to make all transport modes more sustainable, affordable and inclusive in all regions of the EU, to make sustainable alternatives widely available in a multimodal transport system and to put in place the right incentives to drive the transition, notably by ensuring a fair transition, in line with the objectives presented in the Council Recommendation (EU) […] of […] on ensuring a fair transition towards climate neutrality.
Amendment 228 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The planning, development and operation of the trans-European transport network should enable sustainable forms of transport, provide for improved multimodal and interoperable transport solutions and for an enhanced intermodal integration of the entire logistic chain, thereby contributing to a smooth functioning of the internal market by creating the arteries that are necessary for smooth passenger and freight transport flows across the Union. In addition, the network
Amendment 229 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The planning, development and operation of the trans-European transport network should
Amendment 230 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The planning, development and operation of the trans-European transport network should enable sustainable forms of transport, provide for improved multimodal and interoperable transport solutions and for an enhanced intermodal integration of the entire logistic chain, thereby contributing to a smooth functioning of the internal market by creating the arteries that are necessary for smooth passenger and freight transport flows across the Union. In addition, the network should aim at strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion by ensuring accessibility and connectivity for all regions of the Union, including a better connectivity of the outermost regions and other remote, rural, insular, peripheral, coastal and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas. The development of the trans-European transport network should also enable seamless, safe and sustainable mobility of goods and persons in all their diversity, and should contribute to further economic growth and competitiveness in a global perspective, by establishing
Amendment 231 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The planning, development and operation of the trans-European transport network should enable sustainable forms of transport, provide for improved multimodal and interoperable transport solutions and for an enhanced intermodal integration of the entire logistic chain, thereby contributing to a smooth functioning of the internal market by creating the arteries that are necessary for smooth passenger and freight transport flows across the Union. In addition, the network should aim at strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion by ensuring accessibility and connectivity for all regions of the Union, including a better connectivity of the outermost regions and other remote, rural, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas. The development of the trans-European transport network should also enable seamless, safe and sustainable mobility of goods and persons in all their diversity, and should contribute to further economic growth and competitiveness in a global perspective, by establishing interconnections and interoperability between national transport networks in a
Amendment 232 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 a (new) (5a) The trans-European transport network shall contribute to increased accessibility across the Union and combat mobility poverty. To this end, Member States shall present the Commission with accessibility data at regular intervals, and present plans to remedy any deficiencies.
Amendment 233 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion in international transport. In order to ensure the international mobility of passengers and goods, whilst remaining in line with the EU climate targets, the capacity of the trans-European transport network for rail, inland waterways and maritime transport and the use of that capacity should be optimised and, where necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links, particularly in rail, within and between Member States, cross-border also at smaller scale and regional level and, as appropriate, neighbouring countries, and
Amendment 234 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion in international transport. In order to ensure the international mobility of passengers and goods, and avoid the monopolistic situations that can arise in the outermost regions and islands, the capacity of the trans-European transport network and the use of that capacity should be optimised and, where necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links within and between Member States and, as appropriate, neighbouring countries, and taking into account the ongoing negotiations with candidate and potential candidate countries.
Amendment 235 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion in international transport. In order to ensure the international mobility of passengers and goods, the resilience and capacity of the trans-European transport network and the use of that capacity should be optimised and, where necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links within and between Member States and, as appropriate, neighbouring countries, and taking into account the ongoing negotiations with candidate and potential candidate countries.
Amendment 236 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion in international transport. In order to ensure the international mobility of passengers and goods, the resilience and capacity of the trans-European transport network and the use of that capacity should be optimised and, where necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links within and between Member States and, as appropriate, neighbouring countries, and taking into account the ongoing negotiations with candidate and potential candidate countries.
Amendment 237 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion in international transport. In order to ensure the international mobility of passengers and goods, the resilience and capacity of the trans-European transport network and the use of that capacity should be optimised and, where necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links within and between Member States and, as appropriate, neighbouring countries, and taking into account the ongoing negotiations with candidate and potential candidate countries.
Amendment 238 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion in international transport. In order to ensure the international mobility of passengers and goods, the capacity and resilience of the trans-European transport network and the use of that capacity should be optimised and, where necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links within and
Amendment 239 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 6 (6) Growth in traffic has resulted in increased congestion in international transport. In order to ensure the international mobility of passengers and goods, the capacity and resilience of the trans-European transport network and the use of that capacity should be optimised and, where necessary, expanded by removing infrastructure bottlenecks and bridging missing infrastructure links within and between Member States and, as appropriate, neighbouring countries, and taking into account the ongoing negotiations with candidate and potential candidate countries.
Amendment 240 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The trans-European transport network consists to a large extent of existing infrastructure. In order to fully achieve the objectives of the new trans- European transport network policy, uniform requirements regarding the infrastructure should be established on the one hand and, on the other, measures should be taken to support the areas remaining mostly outside the network itself, given that they are missing out badly in terms of their own social and economic development and the wider economic and production advantages offered at European level.
Amendment 241 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The trans-European transport network consists to a large extent of existing infrastructure. In order to fully achieve the objectives of the new trans- European transport network policy, uniform requirements regarding the infrastructure should be established and measures taken to ensure the routine and non-routine maintenance of infrastructures.
Amendment 242 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 7 (7) The trans-European transport network consists to a large extent of existing infrastructure. In order to fully achieve the objectives of the new trans- European transport network policy, uniform requirements regarding the infrastructure and its maintenance should be established.
Amendment 243 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The trans-European transport network should be developed and sustained through the creation of new transport infrastructure, particularly for rail and active mobility, through the maintenance and upgrading of existing infrastructure and through measures promoting its resource-
Amendment 244 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 (8) The trans-European transport network should be developed and sustained through the creation of new smart and sustainable transport infrastructure, through the maintenance and upgrading of existing infrastructure and through measures promoting its resource-
Amendment 245 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8a) Regional and urban railway services are crucial for the European network and for achieving the goals of the Green Deal as 80-90% of the Passengers are travelling on these services.;
Amendment 246 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) In the implementation of projects of common interest, due consideration should be given to the particular circumstances of the individual project concerned. Where possible, synergies with other policies should be exploited, for instance with tourism aspects by including, within civil
Amendment 247 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) In the implementation of projects of common interest, due consideration should be given to the particular circumstances of the individual project concerned. Where possible, synergies with other policies should be exploited, for instance with tourism aspects by including, within civil engineering structures such as bridges or tunnels, bicycle infrastructure for cycling paths, including the EuroVelo routes, or with security aspects by including new technologies such as sensors in bridges, or with energy aspects by ensuring synergies with local energy infrastructure.
Amendment 248 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 (9) In the implementation of projects of common interest, due consideration should be given to the particular circumstances of the individual project concerned. Where possible, synergies with other policies should be exploited, for instance with tourism aspects by including, within civil engineering structures such as bridges or tunnels, bicycle infrastructure for cycling paths, including the EuroVelo routes, or with security aspects by including new technologies such as sensors in bridges, or with energy aspects by ensuring synergies with the TEN-E network.
Amendment 249 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9a) The EuroVelo Network should be included in the TEN-T with the implementation of this regulation.
Amendment 250 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes, the development of the trans-
Amendment 251 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes, the development of the trans- European transport network should take into account the security and safety of passengers and freight movements, the
Amendment 252 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In order to achieve a high-quality
Amendment 253 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes, the development of the trans- European transport network should take into account the security and safety of passengers and freight movements, especially freight requiring rapid modes of transport, the contribution to climate change and the impact of climate change and of potential natural hazards and human-made disasters on infrastructure and accessibility for all transport users, especially in regions that are particularly affected by the negative impacts of climate change.
Amendment 254 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes, the development of the trans- European transport network should take into account the security and safety of passengers and freight movements, the contribution to climate change and the impact of climate change and of potential natural hazards and human-made disasters on infrastructure and accessibility for all transport users, especially in regions that are particularly affected by the negative impacts of climate change as well geopolitical changes that could cause disruptions in the supply chain.
Amendment 255 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10a) As signatories to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), the European Union and all Member States are legally obliged to ensure that persons with disabilities have access, on an equal basis with others, to transport and the built environment (Article 9). Acknowledging that millions of persons with disabilities experience barriers to use transport, the European Commission has included the revision of the TEN-T Guidelines in its list of actions under aim 2. “Accessibility – an enabler of rights, autonomy and equality” of the Union Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030. With its Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, the EU has also committed to “making mobility fair and just for all” (Flagship 9), including by improving accessibility for passengers with disabilities, noting that transport proposals under this Strategy must also be compliant with the Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030.
Amendment 256 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) During infrastructure planning, Member States and other project promoters should give due consideration to the risk assessments and adaptation measures that seek to improve resilience, for example to climate change, natural hazards and human-made disasters.
Amendment 257 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) During infrastructure planning, Member States and other project promoters should give due consideration to the risk assessments and adaptation measures that seek to improve resilience, for example to climate change, natural hazards and human-made disasters.
Amendment 258 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 12 (12) During infrastructure planning, Member States and other project promoters should give due consideration to the risk
Amendment 259 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Given the evolution of the Union infrastructure needs and the decarbonisation goals, the Conclusions of the 2020 July European Council, according to which Union expenditure should be consistent with Paris Agreement objectives
Amendment 260 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Given the evolution of the Union infrastructure needs and the decarbonisation goals, the Conclusions of the 2020 July European Council, according to which Union expenditure should be consistent with Paris Agreement objectives
Amendment 261 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Given the evolution of the Union infrastructure needs and the decarbonisation goals, the Conclusions of the 2020 July European Council, according to which Union expenditure should be consistent with Paris Agreement objectives and the "do no significant harm" principle, within the meaning of Article 17 of the Taxonomy Regulation17 , projects of common interest should be primarily assessed in order to ensure that TEN-T policy is coherent with
Amendment 262 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Given the evolution of the Union infrastructure needs and the decarbonisation goals, the Conclusions of the 2020 July European Council, according to which Union expenditure should be consistent with Paris Agreement objectives and the "do no significant harm" principle, within the meaning of Article 17 of the Taxonomy Regulation17 , projects of common interest should be assessed in order to ensure that TEN-T policy is coherent with transport, environmental and climate policy objectives of the Union. Member States and other project promoters should carry out environmental assessments of plans and projects which should include the “do no significant harm” assessment based on the latest
Amendment 263 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Given the evolution of the Union infrastructure needs and the decarbonisation goals, the Conclusions of the 2020 July European Council, according to which Union expenditure should be consistent with Paris Agreement objectives and the "do no significant harm" principle, within the meaning of Article 17 of the Taxonomy Regulation17 , projects of common interest should be assessed in order to ensure that TEN-T policy is coherent with transport, environmental and climate policy objectives of the Union. Member States and other project promoters should carry out environmental assessments of plans and projects which
Amendment 264 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Given the evolution of the Union infrastructure needs and the decarbonisation goals, the Conclusions of the 2020 July European Council, according to which Union expenditure should be consistent with Paris Agreement objectives and the "do no significant harm" principle, within the meaning of Article 17 of the Taxonomy Regulation17 , projects of common interest should be assessed in order to ensure that TEN-T policy is coherent with transport, environmental and climate policy objectives of the Union. Member States and other project promoters should carry out environmental
Amendment 265 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Given the evolution of the Union infrastructure needs and the decarbonisation goals, the Conclusions of the 2020 July European Council, according to which Union expenditure should be consistent with Paris Agreement objectives and the "do no significant harm" principle, within the meaning of Article 17 of the Taxonomy Regulation17 , projects of common interest should be assessed in order to ensure that TEN-T policy is coherent with transport, environmental and climate policy objectives of the Union. Member States and other project promoters
Amendment 266 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Given the evolution of the Union infrastructure needs and the decarbonisation goals, the Conclusions of the 2020 July European Council, according to which Union expenditure should be consistent with Paris Agreement objectives and the "do no significant harm" principle, within the meaning of Article 17 of the Taxonomy Regulation17 , projects of common interest should be assessed in order to ensure that TEN-T policy is coherent with transport, environmental and climate policy objectives of the Union. Member States and other project promoters
Amendment 267 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 (13) Given the evolution of the Union infrastructure needs and the decarbonisation goals, the Conclusions of the 2020 July European Council, according to which Union expenditure should be
Amendment 268 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 a (new) (13a) In order to align with the Union’s climate goals and environmental objectives, priority for sustainable modes of transport, in particular rail, shall be given when it comes to projects of common interest. In addition infrastructure projects related to aviation shall not be considered projects of common interest.
Amendment 269 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 14 (14) Infrastructure projects under the TEN-T Regulation should be resilient to the potential adverse impacts of climate change through a climate vulnerability and risk assessment, including through relevant adaptation measures. Projects for which an environmental impact assessment must be carried out should be subject to climate proofing and integrate the costs of greenhouse gas emissions and the positive effects of climate mitigation measures in the cost-benefit analysis on a life-cycle basis, including the impacts of the construction phase. The climate proofing should be undertaken based on the latest available best practice and guidance18 . This contributes to the integration of climate change-related risks as well as climate change vulnerability and adaptation assessments into investment and planning decisions under the Union budget.
Amendment 270 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 (15) Member States and other project promoters should carry out environmental assessments of plans and projects according to the relevant legislation in order to avoid
Amendment 271 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) Regional and local authorities have legitimate interest in the construction and commissioning of the network installations on which their social, economic and environmental development depends. The interests of regional and local authorities, as well as those of the public concerned by a project of common interest,
Amendment 272 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The interests of regional and local authorities, as well as those of the public concerned by a project of common interest,
Amendment 273 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The interests of regional and local authorities, as well as those of the public concerned by a project of common interest, should be appropriately taken into account in the planning and construction phase of projects, and public information and participation provisions within EU legislation related projects with an environmental impact stemming from the Aarhus convention.
Amendment 274 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The interests of regional and local authorities,
Amendment 275 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The interests of regional and local authorities, as well as those of the public concerned by a project of common interest, should be appropriately taken into account in the planning and construction phase of projects. By giving local authorities a voice in how transport projects are implemented at the level of urban nodes, the transport infrastructure located at the urban node level can absorb transport demand better.
Amendment 276 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The definition of the trans- European transport network should be based on a common and transparent methodology and should represent the highest level of infrastructure planning within the Union. It should be multimodal, that is to say it should include all transport modes and their connections as well as relevant traffic and travel information management systems, and also include local transport modes related to the morphology of the area, such as cableway or lake transport.
Amendment 277 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The definition of the trans- European transport network should be based on a common and transparent methodology and should represent the highest level of infrastructure planning within the Union. It should be multimodal, that is to say it should include all transport modes, including active modes, and their connections as well as relevant traffic and travel information management systems.
Amendment 278 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 20 (20) The comprehensive network should be a Europe-wide transport network ensuring the accessibility and connectivity of all regions in the Union, including the outermost regions and other remote, rural, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas, and strengthening social, economic and territorial cohesion between them. In order to ensure effective territorial and social cohesion, consideration ought to be given to gradually incorporating the outermost regions into the core network. The requirements for the infrastructure of the comprehensive network should be set in order to promote the development of a high-quality network throughout the Union.
Amendment 279 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The core, extended core and comprehensive networks should be sufficiently equipped with alternative fuels infrastructure in order to ensure that it effectively supports the transition to low and zero-
Amendment 280 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The comprehensive network should be sufficiently equipped with alternative fuels infrastructure in order to ensure that it effectively supports the transition to zero- emission mobility
Amendment 281 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The comprehensive network should be sufficiently equipped with alternative fuels infrastructure in order to ensure that it effectively supports the transition to low- carbon and zero-
Amendment 282 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The comprehensive network should be sufficiently electrified and equipped with alternative fuels infrastructure in order to ensure that it effectively supports the transition to zero-
Amendment 283 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 22 a (new) (22a) In view of the ambition of the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy to increase the rail freight market share and high-speed passengers rail traffic, the potential of high-speed rail connections should be fully exploited to improve strategic transport links between major economic centres across Member States, where rapid rail connections will particularly benefit businesses and citizens. The TEN-T should therefore promote the development of relevant rail connections as a high-speed rail line for a speed of 250km/h or above.
Amendment 284 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The core network has been identified on the basis of an objective planning methodology. That methodology has identified the most important urban nodes, ports and airports, as well as border crossing points. Wherever possible, those nodes are to be connected with multimodal links
Amendment 285 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 (23) The core network has been identified on the basis of an objective planning methodology. That methodology has identified the most important urban nodes, ports and airports, as well as border
Amendment 286 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 23 a (new) (23a) The core network should be expanded to sufficiently cover strategically important maritime ports within the European Union, especially geopolitically. The scope of the expansion should be determined by taking into account the role of maritime ports in the security of supply, renewable energy production as well as building and maintenance of those facilities.
Amendment 287 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The core network with a deadline of 2030 and the extended core network with a deadline of 2040 should constitute the foundation of the sustainable multimodal transport network, representing the strategically most important nodes and links of the trans-European transport network, according to traffic needs. They should stimulate the development of the entire comprehensive network and enable Union action to concentrate on those components of the trans-European transport network with the highest European added value, in particular cross- border sections, missing links, multimodal connecting points and major bottlenecks. Projected new construction lines in cross- border regions should be accelerated taking into account the freight capacity potential of projects with a view to exponentially increase rail freight traffic at EU level in line with the objectives of the European Green Deal.
Amendment 288 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The core network with a deadline of 2030 and the extended core network with a deadline of 2040 should constitute the foundation of the sustainable multimodal transport network, representing the strategically most important nodes and links of the trans-European transport network, according to traffic needs. They should stimulate the development of the entire comprehensive network and enable
Amendment 289 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The core network with a deadline of 2030 and the extended core network with a deadline of 2040 should constitute the foundation of the sustainable multimodal transport network, representing the strategically most important nodes and links of the trans-European transport network, according to traffic needs. They should stimulate the development of the entire comprehensive network and enable Union action to concentrate on those components of the trans-European transport network with the highest European added value, in particular cross- border sections, including maritime cross- border nodes, missing links, multimodal connecting points and major bottlenecks.
Amendment 290 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The core network with a deadline of 2030 and the extended core network with a deadline of 2040 should constitute the foundation of the sustainable multimodal transport network, representing the strategically most important nodes and links of the trans-European transport network, according to traffic needs. They should stimulate the development of the entire comprehensive network and enable Union action to concentrate on those components of the trans-European transport network with the highest European added value, in particular cross- border sections, including maritime cross- border nodes, missing links, multimodal connecting points and major bottlenecks.
Amendment 291 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The core network with a deadline of 2030 and the extended core network with a deadline of 2040 should constitute the foundation of the sustainable multimodal transport network, representing the strategically most important nodes and links of the trans-European transport network, according to traffic needs. They should stimulate the development of the entire comprehensive network and enable Union action to concentrate on those components of the trans-European transport network with the highest European added value, in particular cross- border sections, including maritime cross- border nodes, missing links, multimodal
Amendment 292 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The core network with a deadline of 2030 and the extended core network with a deadline of 2040 should constitute the foundation of the sustainable multimodal transport network, representing the strategically most important nodes and links of the trans-European transport network, according to traffic needs. They should stimulate the development of the entire comprehensive network and enable Union action to concentrate on those components of the trans-European transport network with the highest European added value, in particular cross- border sections, including maritime cross- border nodes, missing links, multimodal connecting points and major bottlenecks.
Amendment 293 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 a (new) (24a) Capacity bottlenecks appear in all modes of transport for both passengers and freight traffic hampering the network connectivity and multimodality. Furthermore, the lack of quality of the last mile connections negatively increases bottlenecks urban nodes. Consequently, the TEN-T Regulation needs to urgently address the existing bottlenecks in the TEN-T, particularly in cross-border links, in order to facilitate seamless and efficient transport to better connect people and business across Europe and contribute to the well-functioning of the EU internal market.
Amendment 294 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) Certain existing standards of the core network should be extended to the extended core and comprehensive network in order to reap full network benefits, to increase interoperability between network types and to enable more activity by more sustainable forms of transport, including through higher digitalisation and other technological solutions. The provision of clear and reliable planning for the technical specifications for interoperability (TSI) is of utmost importance for regulatory stability, legal certainty and for unlocking investments in ERTMS.
Amendment 295 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 (25) Certain existing standards of the core network should be extended to the extended core and comprehensive network in order to reap full network benefits, to increase interoperability between network types and to enable more activity by more sustainable forms of transport, such as rail, including through higher digitalisation and other technological solutions.
Amendment 296 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 25 a (new) (25a) In the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MMF) 2028-2035, the size of the Connecting Europe Facility III shall reflect the ambitious infrastructure requirements set with this Regulation thereby supporting Member States in a timely implementation. Due to the significance of the implementation of ERTMS for an increase in rail capacity, the level of public funding for ERTMS implementation trackside and on-board should be raised to 100%.
Amendment 297 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Exemptions from the infrastructure requirements applicable to the
Amendment 298 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Exemptions from the infrastructure requirements applicable to the core,
Amendment 299 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Exemptions from the infrastructure requirements applicable to the core, extended core and comprehensive network should be possible only in duly justified cases and subject to certain conditions. This should include cases where investment cannot be justified, or where there are specific geographic or significant physical constraints, for example in outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions or in sparsely populated areas, without creating prejudice to the interoperability across the network, or for isolated or partially isolated networks.
Amendment 300 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Exemptions from the infrastructure requirements applicable to the core, extended core and comprehensive network should be possible only in duly justified cases and subject to certain conditions. This should include cases where investment cannot be justified, or where there are specific geographic or significant physical constraints, for example in outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions or in sparsely populated areas only if they are origin or destination areas, or for isolated or partially isolated networks.
Amendment 301 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Exemptions from the infrastructure requirements applicable to the core, extended core and comprehensive network
Amendment 302 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26a) An isolated network for the purposes of this Regulation should mean a rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge different from that of the European standard nominal track gauge. Imposing certain standards and requirements of this Regulation to such networks, or parts thereof, is not justified in economic cost- benefit terms by virtue of the specificities of such networks arising from their detachment with other networks of a different track gauge.
Amendment 303 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26a) An isolated network for the purposes of this Regulation should mean a rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge different from that of the European standard nominal track gauge. Imposing certain standards and requirements of this Regulation to such networks, or parts thereof, is not justified in economic cost- benefit terms by virtue of the specificities of such networks arising from their detachment with other networks of a different track gauge.
Amendment 304 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26a) An isolated network for the purposes of this Regulation should mean a rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge different from that of the European standard nominal track gauge. Imposing certain standards and requirements of this Regulation to such networks, or parts thereof, is not justified in economic cost- benefit terms by virtue of the specificities of such networks arising from their detachment with other networks of a different track gauge.
Amendment 305 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) The land-side infrastructure network, established through the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, should integrate with the maritime and inland waterways dimensions of the trans-
Amendment 306 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) The land-side infrastructure network, established through the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, should integrate with the maritime dimension of the trans- European transport network. To this end, a truly sustainable, smart, seamless and resilient European Maritime Space should be created. It should encompass all maritime infrastructure components of the trans-European transport network as well as the services and actions needed to support the mobility of persons and goods with special attention to insular and coastal regions.
Amendment 307 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) The land-side infrastructure network, established through the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, should integrate with the maritime dimension of the trans- European transport network. To this end, a truly sustainable, smart, seamless and resilient European Maritime Space should be created. It should encompass all maritime infrastructure components of the trans-European transport network
Amendment 308 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) The land-side infrastructure network, established through the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, should integrate with the maritime dimension of the trans- European transport network. To this end, a truly sustainable, smart, seamless and resilient European Maritime Space should be created. It should encompass all maritime infrastructure components of the trans-European transport network, while paying a special attention to islands.
Amendment 309 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 27 (27) The land-side infrastructure network, established through the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, should integrate with the maritime dimension of the trans- European transport network. To this end, a truly sustainable, smart, seamless and resilient European Maritime Space should be created. It should encompass all maritime infrastructure components of the
Amendment 310 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 28 a (new) (28a) The European Inland Waterways Space should be implemented in close cooperation with the River Commissions and Regional authorities which provide a suitable European territorial cooperation framework both at transnational Union level and at cross-border level with third countries.
Amendment 311 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) As stated in the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, an integration of the Core Network Corridors and of the Rail Freight Corridors into ‘European Transport Corridors’ is needed to increase synergies between infrastructure planning and the operation of transport. The European Transport Corridors should become the instrument for the development of sustainable and multimodal freight and passenger transport flows in Europe and for the development of interoperable high quality infrastructure and operational
Amendment 312 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) As stated in the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, an integration of the Core Network Corridors and of the Rail Freight Corridors into ‘European Transport Corridors’ is needed to increase synergies between infrastructure planning and the operation of rail transport. The European Transport Corridors should become the instrument for the development of sustainable and multimodal freight and passenger transport flows in Europe and for the development of interoperable high quality infrastructure and operational performance. As such, they should also be the tool to realise the vision of creating a highly competitive rail network across the Union, including a high speed train network but also an optimised coexistence between cargo trains and night trains.
Amendment 313 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) As stated in the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, an integration of the Core Network Corridors and of the Rail Freight Corridors into ‘European Transport Corridors’ is needed to increase synergies between infrastructure planning and the operation of transport. The European Transport Corridors should become the instrument for the development of sustainable and multimodal freight and passenger transport flows in Europe and for the development of interoperable high quality infrastructure and operational performance. As such, they should also be the tool to realise the vision of creating a highly competitive multimodal transport rail network across the Union.
Amendment 314 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) As stated in the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, an integration of the Core Network Corridors and of the Rail Freight Corridors into ‘European Transport Corridors’ is needed to increase synergies between infrastructure planning and the operation of transport. The European Transport Corridors should become the instrument for the development of sustainable and multimodal freight and passenger transport flows in Europe and for the development of interoperable high quality infrastructure and operational performance. As such, they should also be the tool to realise the vision of creating a highly competitive rail and inland waterway network across the
Amendment 315 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 30 (30) As stated in the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, an integration of the Core Network Corridors and of the Rail Freight Corridors into ‘European Transport Corridors’ is needed to increase synergies between infrastructure planning and the operation of transport. The European Transport Corridors should become the instrument for the development of sustainable and multimodal freight and passenger transport flows in Europe and for the development of interoperable high quality infrastructure and operational performance. As such, they should also be the tool to realise the vision of creating a highly competitive
Amendment 316 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 31 (31) European Transport Corridors should cover the most important long- distance transport flows, with rail as the backbone, and consist of key European transport multimodal axis, based on parts of the trans-European transport network, be multimodal and open to the inclusion of all transport modes covered in this Regulation and cross at least two borders and involve at least three transport modes, one of which needs to be rail.
Amendment 317 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 (32) In order to establish the trans- European transport network in a coordinated and timely manner, thereby making it possible to maximise network effects, Member States concerned should ensure that appropriate measures are taken to finalise the projects of common interest of the core, the extended core and the comprehensive network by the given deadlines 2030, 2040 and 2050 respectively. To this end, Member States should ensure that there is coherence of the national transport and investment plans with the priorities set out in this Regulation and in the work plans of the European Coordinators. Projects of national plans which are not aligned with the Union transport objectives should not be considered as a priority for receiving Union funds.
Amendment 318 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 a (new) (32a) The extended and enhanced infrastructure requirements for transport, and rail in particular, require proportionate and sufficient investments, also beyond the multiannual financing framework of 2021-2027. Further generations of Connecting Europe Facility shall address these needs.
Amendment 319 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 33 (33) It is necessary to identify projects of common interest which will contribute to the achievement of the trans-European transport network and which contribute to the achievement of the objectives and correspond to the priorities established in this Regulation. Their implementation should depend on their degree of maturity, on their compliance with Union and national legal procedures
Amendment 320 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) Projects of common interest to develop the trans-European transport network in line with the requirements set out in this Regulation have European added value, as they contribute to a high- quality, interoperable and multimodal European network, increasing sustainability, cohesion, efficiency or user benefits. In this regard, the rail connectivity index established by the Decision (EU(2020/2228)) establishing 2021 as the European Year of Rail, should be developed in order to measure the increase in rail connectivity of the network of each transport infrastructure project. The European added value is higher if it leads, in addition to the potential value for the respective Member State alone, to significant improvements of transport connections or transport flows between Member States or between a Member State and a third country. Such cross-border projects should be the subject of priority intervention by the Union in order to ensure that they are implemented. The European added value increases also according to the emissions reduction potential of the project, with regard to the respective 2030 and 2050 targets horizons.
Amendment 321 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) Projects of common interest to develop the trans-European transport network in line with the requirements set out in this Regulation have European added value, as they contribute to a high- quality, interoperable and multimodal European network, increasing sustainability, resilience of strategic infrastructures, cohesion, efficiency or user benefits. The European added value is higher if it leads, in addition to the potential value for the respective Member State alone, to significant improvements of transport connections or transport flows between Member States or between a Member State and a third country. Such cross-border projects should be the subject of priority intervention by the Union in order to ensure that they are implemented.
Amendment 322 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) Projects of common interest to develop the trans-European transport network in line with the requirements set out in this Regulation have European added value, as they contribute to a high- quality, interoperable and multimodal European network, increasing sustainability, cohesion, resilience of strategic infrastructure, efficiency or user benefits. The European added value is
Amendment 323 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) Projects of common interest to develop the trans-European transport network in line with the requirements set out in this Regulation have European added value, as they contribute to a high- quality, interoperable and multimodal European network, increasing sustainability, cohesion, efficiency, resilience of strategic infrastructure or user benefits. The European added value is higher if it leads, in addition to the potential value for the respective Member State alone, to significant improvements of transport connections or transport flows between Member States or between a Member State and a third country. Such cross-border projects should be the subject of priority intervention by the Union in order to ensure that they are implemented.
Amendment 324 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) Projects of common interest to develop the trans-European transport network in line with the requirements set out in this Regulation have European added value, as they contribute to a high- quality, interoperable and multimodal European network, increasing sustainability, resilience, cohesion, efficiency or user benefits. The European added value is higher if it leads, in addition to the potential value for the respective Member State alone, to significant improvements of transport connections or transport flows between Member States or between a Member State and a third country. Such cross-border projects should be the subject of priority intervention by the Union in order to ensure that they are implemented.
Amendment 325 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 a (new) (34a) Whenever projects of common interest meet European added value by increasing sustainability, cohesion, efficiency or users’ needs, The Commission should assist the Member States in providing financial support to ensure infrastructure optimization, maintenance, consolidation and upgrading.
Amendment 326 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 a (new) (34a) Whenever projects of common interest meet European added value by increasing sustainability, cohesion, efficiency or users’ needs, Member States should ensure that these projects continue to benefit from infrastructure optimization, maintenance, consolidation and upgrading.
Amendment 327 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 (35) Member States and other project promoters should ensure that assessments of projects of common interest are carried out efficiently, avoiding unnecessary delays, and include a proper analysis of the net balance impact in terms of emissions and energy savings on a life- cycle basis, with both 2030 and 2050 as reference horizons.
Amendment 328 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) Projects of common interest for which Union funding is sought should be the subject of a soci
Amendment 329 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) Projects of common interest for which Union funding is sought should be the subject of a socio-economic and environmental cost-
Amendment 330 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) Projects of common interest for which Union funding is sought should be the subject of a socio-economic cost- benefit analysis based on a recognised methodology, taking into account the relevant social, economic, climate-related and environmental benefits, territorial balance, and costs as well as the life-cycle approach. The analysis of climate-related and environmental costs and benefits should be based on the environmental impact assessment carried out pursuant to Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council21 . __________________ 21 Directive 2011/92/EU of the European
Amendment 331 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 a (new) Amendment 332 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) In order to contribute to the climate reduction targets of the European Green Deal of a 90% cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 for the transport sector, measures to mitigate the greenhouse gas impacts of projects of common interest in the form of new, extended or upgraded transport infrastructures should be analysed
Amendment 333 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) In order to contribute to the climate reduction targets of the European Green Deal of a 90% cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, measures to mitigate the greenhouse gas impacts of projects of common interest in the form of new, extended or upgraded transport infrastructures should be
Amendment 334 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 37 (37) In order to contribute to the climate reduction targets of the European Green Deal of a 90% cut in greenhouse gas emissions
Amendment 335 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 (38) Cooperation with third countries, including neighbouring countries, is necessary in order to ensure connection and interoperability between the infrastructure networks of the Union and those countries. In view of this, where appropriate, the Union should promote projects of common interest with those countries
Amendment 336 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 a (new) (38a) Because of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, and the position adopted by Belarus in that conflict, cooperation between the Union and Russia and Belarus in the field of the TEN-T policy is neither appropriate nor in the interest of the Union. Hence the TEN-T network in those two third countries should be discontinued. As a consequence, improved cross-border connections to Russia and Belarus are no longer of high priority on the territory of the Member States. Connections currently exist between Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland with those two third countries. To reflect the lesser priority in building and upgrading those connections, the last-miles of all cross- border connections with Russia and Belarus currently included in the core network should be downgraded from the core to the comprehensive network for which only a later deadline of implementation of 2050 is provided for. This downgrade should not endanger the eligibility of these connections from the CEF instrument. In case of a democratic transition in Belarus building and upgrading the country’s cross border connections with the EU in line with the comprehensive economic plan for a democratic Belarus would be a high priority, including through re-inclusion of the country back in the Regulation.
Amendment 337 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 a (new) (38a) Calls for the development of a conceptual model for linking the Via Carpathia road corridor through Türkiye to Baku in Azerbaijan, in order to increase north-south transport accessibility in Eastern Europe and to improve connectivity and the flow of goods and services between the Baltic Sea and the Caspian Sea, thereby increasing the economic potential and enhancing the security of the region and of the EU as a whole.
Amendment 338 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 b (new) (38b) The new geopolitical context also showed how important seamless transport connections are within the Union’s territory and with neighbouring third countries. A different railway track gauge from the European nominal standard nominal track gauge of 1 435 mm severely hampers the interoperability of the railway networks across the Union and even impacts the competitiveness of those isolated railway networks. New railway lines should therefore be built in European standard nominal track gauge of 1 435 mm. However, Member States should have the possibility to use a different track gauge in new railway lines but only in duly justified cases. Member States with a different track gauge network should assess the migration of existing lines of the European Transport Corridors. This obligation should not apply to Ireland as its transport network, due to its insular situation, is fully detached from any land-side connection on the Union territory.
Amendment 339 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To achieve transformation of the transport sector into a truly multimodal system of sustainable and smart mobility services, the Union should build a high quality transport network
Amendment 340 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To achieve transformation of the transport sector into a truly multimodal system of sustainable and smart mobility services, the Union should build a high quality transport network with rail services meeting minimum line speed. Competitive passenger rail has a high potential for the decarbonisation of transport. There is the need to develop a coherent and interoperable European high speed rail network linking its capitals and major cities. Complementing existing high speed lines with passenger lines at a minimum line speed of 160 km/h should in return lead to network effects, a more coherent network and an increased number of passengers travelling by rail. Double-track infrastructure should be required for railway infrastructure in cross-border capacity barriers. Saturated single-track decreases the competitiveness of rail and promotes the choice of less environmentally friendly transport modes. In line with the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy it is crucial to eliminate existing bottlenecks and increase the competitiveness of rail. The completion of a high-performance network will also facilitate the development and introduction of new or different models of capacity allocation, for example interval-
Amendment 341 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To achieve transformation of the transport sector into a truly multimodal system of sustainable and smart mobility services, the Union should build a high quality transport network with rail services meeting minimum line speed. Competitive passenger rail has a high potential for the decarbonisation of transport. There is the need to develop a coherent and interoperable European high speed rail network linking its capitals and major cities. Complementing existing high speed lines with passenger lines at a minimum line speed of 160 km/h should in return lead to network effects, a more coherent network and an increased number of passengers travelling by rail. Newly constructed high speed lines should be designed for a minimum line speed of 300 km/h. The completion of a high- performance network will also facilitate the development and introduction of new or different models of capacity allocation, for example interval-
Amendment 342 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To achieve transformation of the transport sector into a truly multimodal
Amendment 343 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To achieve transformation of the transport sector into a truly multimodal system of sustainable and smart mobility services, the Union should build a high quality transport network with rail services meeting minimum operational line speed. Competitive passenger rail has a high potential for the decarbonisation of transport. There is the need to develop a coherent and interoperable European high speed rail network linking its capitals and major cities for which sufficient funding is needed. Complementing existing high speed
Amendment 344 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To achieve transformation of the transport sector into a truly multimodal system of sustainable and smart mobility services, the Union should build a high quality transport network with rail services meeting minimum line speed. Competitive passenger rail has a high potential for the decarbonisation of transport. There is the need to develop a coherent and interoperable European high speed rail network linking its capitals and major cities. Complementing existing high speed lines with passenger lines at a minimum line speed of 160 km/h should in return lead to network effects, a more coherent network and an increased number of passengers travelling by rail. The completion of a high-performance network will also
Amendment 345 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To achieve transformation of the transport sector into a truly multimodal system of sustainable and smart mobility services, the Union should build a high quality transport network with rail services meeting minimum line speed. Competitive passenger rail has a high potential for the decarbonisation of transport. There is the need to develop a coherent and interoperable European high speed rail network linking its capitals and major cities. Complementing existing high speed lines with passenger lines at a minimum line speed of 160 km/h should in return lead to network effects, a more coherent network and an increased number of passengers travelling by rail. The completion of a high-performance network will also
Amendment 346 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To achieve transformation of the transport sector into a truly multimodal system of sustainable and smart mobility services, the Union should build a high quality transport network with rail services meeting minimum line speed. Competitive passenger rail has a high potential for the decarbonisation of transport. There is the need to develop a coherent and interoperable European high speed rail network linking its capitals and major cities. Complementing existing high speed lines with passenger lines at a minimum line speed of 160 km/h should in return lead to network effects, a more coherent network and an increased number of passengers travelling by rail. The completion of a high-performance network will also
Amendment 347 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 a (new) (39a) (39) The resilience of the European transport network has been challenged and put to test by the devastating impact of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. That aggression has redefined the geopolitical landscape, bringing to the surface the vulnerability of the Union to unforeseen disruptive events beyond the Union’s borders. Its major impacts on global markets, such as global food security, has highlighted the fact that the Union’s internal market and its transport network cannot be viewed in isolation when it comes to shaping Union policy. Better connections with the Union neighbouring partner countries are needed more than ever. In addition to Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, the Union should also look at other factors that reshape our geopolitical landscape and affect the resilience of our transport network and of the Union as a whole. Investments, interests and presence of third country-owned companies in European strategic - and sometimes even military - infrastructure, such as ports, airports and container terminals, are increasing. Such increasing foreign presence in European strategic infrastructure has the potential to undermine the resilience of our Union. Therefore, especially in view of the new security situation on our continent, it is crucial that the Union adopts with priority a stringent strategic approach towards the development and revision of the trans- European transport network and prevents any third country presence that is likely to affect security or public order in the Union.
Amendment 348 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 a (new) (39a) Rail passenger traffic numbers, on TEN-T corridors but also at national and regional level, will need to substantially increase in order to reach the goals of the EU Green Deal. In order to achieve this, passengers should have a seamless user experience when searching, selecting and buying their railway services, including through-ticketing and its associated rights.
Amendment 349 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 b (new) (39b) Rail high speed services have proven in many European countries their attractiveness for longer-distance journeys, providing better service than other modes in terms of duration, convenience and comfort for travelling distances up to 1200 km, while being 15 times more energy efficient. European distances are particularly suitable to this mode of transport and most EU capitals, major cities and metropolitan areas could be interconnected thanks to high speed. This is vital to reach the objective of the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy which aims to double High Speed rail traffic by 2030 and triple by 2050. However, the current European network is fragmented and mainly made up of “national high-speed islands” and there is thus an urgent need to develop an EU High-Speed Network with a larger number of connections between all EU capitals, major cities and metropolitan areas.
Amendment 350 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40) A more sustainable, resilient and reliable rail freight network across Europe should be established to contribute to the competitiveness of the multimodal and combined transport. The infrastructure for combined
Amendment 351 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40) A more sustainable, resilient and reliable rail freight network across Europe should be established to contribute to the competitiveness of combined transport. The infrastructure for combined
Amendment 352 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40) A more sustainable, resilient and reliable rail freight network across Europe should be established to contribute to the competitiveness of combined transport. Essential in this are rail connections to ports and those should be maintained and remain accessible to users. The infrastructure for combined railway transport and of terminals should be upgraded to ensure that intermodal transport is primarily done by rail, inland waterways or short-sea shipping and that any initial and/or final legs carried out by road are as short as possible.
Amendment 353 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40) A more sustainable, resilient and reliable rail freight network across Europe should be established to contribute to the competitiveness of combined transport, effectively enabling a major decarbonisation of the sector. The infrastructure for combined railway transport and of terminals should be upgraded to ensure that intermodal transport is primarily done by rail, inland waterways or short-sea shipping and that any initial and/or final legs carried out by road are as short as possible and zero- emission.
Amendment 354 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40) A more sustainable, resilient and reliable rail freight network across Europe should be established to contribute to the competitiveness of multimodal and combined transport. The infrastructure for combined railway transport and of terminals should be upgraded to ensure that intermodal transport is primarily done by rail, inland waterways or short-sea shipping and that any initial and/or final legs carried out by road are as short as possible.
Amendment 355 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 a (new) (40a) Whereas in some Member States the port rail infrastructure network as a whole is defined as a rail service facility, in other Member States this definition is not applied. The complexity of rail infrastructure and heterogeneity of its governance inside European ports makes it necessary to adapt the roll-out of rail requirements accordingly. To achieve the objective of improving the rail access route to the port, the rail requirements should be applied up to the rail handover point, where the train is being transferred from the public network to the port rail network. The port managing body should assess the need to implement the rail requirements in other parts of the port rail network.
Amendment 356 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 a (new) (40a) Rail port infrastructure is managed and governed differently across ports in EU Members States and this demands particular roll-out of rail requirements. To achieve the objective of improving the rail access route to the port, the rail requirements should be applied up to the rail handover point, where the train is being transferred from the public network to the port rail network. The port managing body should assess the need to implement the rail requirements in other parts of the port rail network.
Amendment 357 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 41 (41) Given the fact that the deployment of the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS)
Amendment 358 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 41 a (new) (41a) Because of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, and the position adopted by Belarus in that conflict, cooperation between the Union and Russia and Belarus in the field of the TEN-T policy is neither appropriate nor in the interest of the Union. Hence the TEN-T network in those two third countries should be discontinued. As a consequence, improved cross-border connections to Russia and Belarus are no longer of high priority on the territory of the Member States. Connections currently exist between Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland with those two third countries. To reflect the lesser priority in building and upgrading those connections, the last-miles of all cross- border connections with Russia and Belarus currently included in the core network should be downgraded from the core to the comprehensive network for which only a later deadline of implementation of 2050 is provided for. However, in case of a democratic transition in Belarus building and upgrading the country’s cross border connections with the EU in line with the comprehensive economic plan for a democratic Belarus would be a high priority, including through re-inclusion of the country back in the Regulation.’ The transfer of the last sections leading to the borders of Russia and Belarus from the core network to the comprehensive network must not, however, endanger the eligibility of the road and rail connections in question from the CEF instrument. The accessibility of the various regions of the member states, such as Eastern Finland, must not be unnecessarily weakened in the changed geopolitical situation.
Amendment 359 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) ERTMS should be deployed in a continuous and synchronised manner not only on the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, including in the urban nodes, but also on access routes to multimodal terminals. Synchronised means a coordinated approach in time and place between infrastructure roll out and the roll out of on-board units of trains. This will enable cross-border operations with ERTMS only and boost operational harmonisation and the business case of railway undertakings.
Amendment 360 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) ERTMS should be deployed in a continuous and synchronised manner not only on the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, including in the urban nodes, but also on access routes to multimodal terminals. Synchronised means a coordinated approach in time and place between infrastructure roll out and the roll out of on-board units of trains. This will enable cross-border operations with ERTMS
Amendment 361 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) ERTMS should be deployed and synchronised in a continuous manner not only on the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, including in the urban nodes, but also on access routes to multimodal terminals. Synchronised means a coordinated approach in time and place between infrastructure roll out and the roll out of on-board units of trains. This will enable cross-border operations with ERTMS
Amendment 362 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) ERTMS should be deployed in a continuous and synchronised manner not only on the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, including in the urban nodes, but also on access routes to multimodal terminals. Synchronised means a coordinated approach in time and place between infrastructure roll out and the roll out of on-board units of trains. This will enable cross-border operations with ERTMS
Amendment 363 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) ERTMS should be deployed in a continuous and synchronised manner not only on the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, including in the urban nodes, but also on access routes to multimodal terminals. This will enable operations with ERTMS only and boost the business case of railway undertakings. Under no circumstance should it be possible for a new railway project that is not planning ERTMS deployment to be financed by Union funds.
Amendment 364 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) ERTMS should be deployed in a continuous and synchronised manner not only on the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, including in the urban nodes, but also on access routes to multimodal terminals. This will enable operations with ERTMS only and boost the business case of railway undertakings.
Amendment 365 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) ERTMS should be deployed in a continuous and synchronised manner not only on the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, including in the urban nodes, but also on access routes to multimodal terminals. This will enable operations with ERTMS only and boost the business case of railway undertakings.
Amendment 366 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) ERTMS should be deployed in a continuous manner not only on the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, including in the urban nodes, but also on access routes to multimodal terminals. This will enable operations with ERTMS only and boost the business case of railway undertakings. A special attention should be paid to the deployment of ERTMS close to maritime and inland ports. The deployment of ERTMS shall be exempted in some cases due to the location in the last mile of connection in maritime and inland port infrastructures.
Amendment 367 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 (42) ERTMS should be deployed in a continuous manner not only on the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, including in the urban nodes, but also on access routes to multimodal
Amendment 368 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 a (new) (42a) In order to facilitate a profound modal shift to sustainable rail freight transport by 2030 and 2040, investments are required in coordination with all relevant stakeholders to deliver high- quality cross-border networks. Financial efforts should also be focused on the deployment of digital and telematics applications, such as ERTMS and DAC (digital automatic coupling).
Amendment 369 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 a (new) (42a) The extended and enhanced infrastructure requirements for transport, and rail in particular, require proportionate and sufficient investments, also beyond the multiannual financing framework of 2021-2027. Further generations of Connecting Europe Facility shall address these needs.
Amendment 370 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 a (new) (42a) ERTMS deployment , trackside and on board, should be fully publicly funded in order to incentivise ambitious ERTMS deployment strategies in the Member States and reach in a reasonable time the system benefits that ERTMS can bring.
Amendment 371 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 a (new) (42a) ERTMS deployment , trackside and on board, should be fully publicly funded in order to incentivise ambitious ERTMS deployment strategies in the Member States and reach in a reasonable time the system benefits that ERTMS can bring.
Amendment 372 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 b (new) (42b) While the European Coordinator for ERTMS in close collaboration with national entities should facilitate and promote ERTMS governance ensuring the timely and harmonised deployment, including governing funding, National Implementation Plans (NIP) planning, resourcing, market uptake, migration and transition, European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA)should ensure coherence and consistency in ERTMS deployment and funding taking into account the advice of the European Union Agency for Railways that remains the system authority for ERTMS development.
Amendment 373 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 b (new) (42b) Taking into account the considerable costs for the completion of the TEN-T, other sources of co-funding should be available, including Recovery and Resilience Facility, Cohesion Fund, European Regional Development Fund, Horizon Europe and European Structural, Investment Funds as well as Emissions Trading System (ETS). National Funds are key in ensuring the timely completion of TEN-T. Each Funding Programme should clearly prioritise its financing objectives.
Amendment 374 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 42 c (new) (42c) Whereas the Smart and Sustainable Mobility Strategy sets ambitious targets in terms of high speed network [doubling high-speed rail traffic volume by 2030 and tripling it by 2050], the TEN-T Regulation should focus among others on ensuring the rail high- speed connectivity between capitals and major cities of Europe.
Amendment 375 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 (43) As deployment of a radio-based ERTMS further contributes to the elimination of national rules affecting operation, Member States should ensure that only radio-based ERTMS will be deployed from 2025 and the entire trans- European transport network equipped with radio-based ERTMS by 2050. Space technologies should be used also for a faster and less costly deployment.
Amendment 376 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 43 a (new) (43a) While the European Coordinator for ERTMS in close collaboration with national entities should facilitate and promote ERTMS governance ensuring the timely and harmonised deployment, including governing funding, National Implementation Plans (NIP) planning, resourcing, market uptake, migration and transition, European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) should ensure coherence and consistency in ERTMS deployment and funding taking into account the advice of the European Union Agency for Railways that remains the system authority for ERTMS development.
Amendment 377 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 (44) ERTMS deployment should be coupled with a regulatory deadline for decommissioning of class B systems trackside, thus making ERTMS the only signalling system used in Member States. Decommissioning of class B systems trackside will bring about significant maintenance savings for infrastructure managers, as deploying ERTMS and keeping additional trackside systems for a prolonged period is very costly and complicated. Class B systems should be removed in a coordinated way with a sufficient transitional period, by 2040, allowing the railway undertakings to anticipate the change and adopt the most suitable migration strategy. ERTMS, being a system, requires a synchronised deployment both trackside and on-board and full system benefits only occur when both trains and trackside are equipped. The European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA), in close cooperation with the horizontal priority coordinator and with the advice of ERA, is well placed to contribute to a consistent, synchronised and widespread implementation of ERTMS.
Amendment 378 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 (44) ERTMS deployment should be coupled with a regulatory deadline for decommissioning of class B systems trackside, thus making ERTMS the only signalling system used in Member States. Decommissioning of class B systems trackside will bring about significant maintenance savings for infrastructure managers, as deploying ERTMS and keeping additional trackside systems for a prolonged period is very costly and complicated. Class B systems should be removed in a coordinated way with a sufficient transitional period, by 2040, allowing the railway undertakings to anticipate the change and adopt the most suitable migration strategy. ERTMS, being a system, requires a synchronised deployment both trackside and on-board and full system benefits, including safety benefits, only occur when both trains and trackside are equipped.
Amendment 379 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 a (new) (44a) Rail passenger services should become a more attractive option for longer-distance journeys and rail high speed services have proven in many European countries their attractiveness. While being easier to use and 15 times more energy efficient, high-speed rail services are superior in terms of duration, convenience and comfort of traveling, up to distances of 1200 km versus other modes of transport. The European distances are particularly suitable to this mode of transport and most EU Capitals, major cities and metropolitan areas could be interconnected thanks to high speed. However, the current European network is fragmented and mainly made up of “national high-speed islands” and there is an urgent need to develop a EU High- Speed Network with a larger number of connections between all EU Capitals, major cities and metropolitan areas. This is vital to reach the objective of the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy which aims to double High Speed rail traffic by 2030 and triple by 2050. The advantages of high-speed rail versus other transport modes are as follows: 1. transport capacity : high-capacity transport capable of covering long distances, 2. energy consumption : extremely low energy consumption per passenger, 3. emissions : extremely low emission footprint in case of electric traction, 4. Permanent noise pollution : significantly better parameters than road and aviation transport, 5. infrastructure spatial requirements : significantly lower space demand (per transported volume) than road transport, 6. travel comfort : being able to provide a very high standard, 7. travel time : up to 1200 km, High Speed Rail can successfully compete with air transport, 8. Safety: high-speed rail is one of the safest modes to travel.
Amendment 380 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 a (new) (44a) The useful life of rail equipment, including ERTMS, is around 30 years on average, ensuring a long period of return on investments, which, while slowing down the renewal of equipment, is a major financial consideration when it comes to balancing operational costs and benefits. However, frequent updates to technical interoperability specifications effectively limit the lifespan of the equipment, which cannot be predicted with any certainty by rail transport stakeholders, possibly deterring prospective investors. It is therefore necessary seek a level of regulatory stability that consistently upholds the principle of technological neutrality at least.
Amendment 381 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 a (new) (44a) While the European Coordinator for ERTMS in close collaboration with national entities should facilitate and promote ERTMS governance ensuring the timely and harmonised deployment, including governing funding, National Implementation Plans (NIP) planning, resourcing, market uptake, migration and transition of systems, European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) should ensure coherence and consistency in ERTMS deployment and funding taking into account the advice of the European Union Agency for Railways that remains the system authority for ERTMS development.
Amendment 382 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 a (new) (44a) While the European Coordinator for ERTMS in close collaboration with national entities should facilitate and promote ERTMS governance ensuring the timely and harmonised deployment, including governing funding, National Implementation Plans (NIP)planning, resourcing, market uptake, migration and transition, European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) should ensure coherence and consistency in ERTMS deployment and funding taking into account the advice of the European Union Agency for Railways that remains the system authority for ERTMS development.
Amendment 383 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 a (new) (44a) The de-isolation of the isolated railway networks is the long term goal of the Regulation, however the migration should be done only where it is viable and in a practical way as direct connections bring new possibilities for the EU wide European gauge network and shall not lead to any further fragmentation inside isolated networks themselves and therefore shall not worsen the existing interoperability within such networks. The changes in the interoperability of the isolated railway networks shall be made in way not to harm the rail services already offered.
Amendment 384 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 a (new) (44a) The de-isolation of the isolated railway networks is the long term goal of the Regulation, however the migration should be done only where it is viable and in a practical way as direct connections bring new possibilities for the EU wide European gauge network and shall not lead to any further fragmentation inside isolated networks themselves and therefore shall not worsen the existing interoperability within such networks. The changes in the interoperability of the isolated railway networks shall be made in way not to harm the rail services already offered.
Amendment 385 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 a (new) (44a) In order to incentivise the ambitious ERTMS deployment strategies in the Member States and reach in a reasonable time the system benefits that ERTMS can bring, its deployment, both trackside and on board, should be up to 100% publicly funded.
Amendment 386 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 b (new) (44b) ERTMS deployment , trackside and on board, should be fully funded in order to incentivise ambitious ERTMS deployment strategies in the Member States and reach in a reasonable time the system benefits that ERTMS can bring.
Amendment 387 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 c (new) (44c) Passengers should have a seamless user experience when searching, selecting and buying their railway services. In order to achieve seamless ticketing, sector-based solutions should be supported and considered as the starting point when improving multimodal ticketing, CER Ticketing Roadmap as an example.
Amendment 388 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 45 (45) Inland waterways in Europe are characterised by a heterogeneous hydro- morphology which hampers a coherent performance for all waterway stretches. Inland waterways, especially free flowing stretches, may be heavily impacted by climate and weather conditions. In order to ensure reliable international traffic, while respecting the hydro-morphology and applicable environmental legislation, TEN- T requirements should take into account the specific hydro-morphology of each waterway
Amendment 389 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 45 (45) Inland waterways in Europe are characterised by a heterogeneous hydro- morphology which hampers a coherent performance for all waterway stretches. Inland waterways, especially free flowing stretches, may be heavily impacted by climate and weather conditions. In order to ensure reliable international traffic, while respecting the hydro-morphology and applicable environmental legislation, TEN- T requirements should take into account the specific hydro-morphology of each waterway (for example free-flowing or regulated rivers) as well as the objectives of environmental and biodiversity policies. Such an approach should be considered at
Amendment 390 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 45 (45) Inland waterways in Europe are characterised by a heterogeneous hydro- morphology which hampers a coherent performance for all waterway stretches. Inland waterways, especially free flowing stretches, may be heavily impacted by climate and weather conditions. In order to
Amendment 391 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 45 a (new) (45a) Good navigation status should be defined by the natural characteristics of free flowing river basins and no major new interventions nor dredging works, which could have a negative impact on biodiversity, should be encouraged in order to enable navigability. Navigation should adapt to the rivers instead, and therefore vessels adapted to climate change and low water should be promoted, incentivising also the use of zero-emission technologies. Infrastructure requirements for zero emissions and full electrification at berth should be set by 2030, in accordance with the Alternative Fuels Infrastructure Regulation.
Amendment 392 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 45 a (new) (45a) Ports play a multi-faceted role in their function as hubs for transport, energy and industry. With their specialised shipyards, ports facilitate the building, conversion and retrofitting of ships. As energy hub, ports also play a strategic role in the diversification of energy supply and for securing resilient supply chains and energy security of the Union. For inclusion in the trans- European transport network, ports should therefore also be considered in terms of their importance with regard to the energy transition, geopolitical position, military mobility and added-value to the region and Union as a whole.
Amendment 393 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 45 a (new) (45a) In view of deploying more sustainable modes of transport through the expansion of EU's inland waterways network, the Commission should conduct a feasibility study in order to assess the construction and the inclusion of the Ruse-Razgrad-Shumen-Provadia-Devnya- Varna stretch to the corridor Rhine- Danube.
Amendment 394 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 45 a (new) (45a) As the cross-border multimodal nodes of the trans-European transport network, inland ports support rail and inland shipping, urban mobility, the circular economy, and sustainable logistics solutions.
Amendment 395 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 45 a (new) (45a) The digital automatic coupling is an essential component of the ETCS as it increases the efficiency and effectiveness in railways and results in a better utilisation of train paths;
Amendment 396 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 (46) Being the entry and exit points for the land infrastructure of the trans- European transport network, maritime ports play an important role as cross-border multimodal nodes which serve not only as transport hubs, but also as gateways for trade, industrial clusters and energy hubs
Amendment 397 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 (46) Being the entry and exit points for the land infrastructure of the trans- European transport network, maritime ports play an important role as cross-border multimodal nodes which serve not only as transport hubs, but also as gateways for trade, industrial clusters and energy hubs, for example with regard to the deployment of off-shore wind installations
Amendment 398 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 (46) Being the entry and exit points for the land infrastructure of the trans- European transport network, maritime ports play an important role as cross-border multimodal nodes which serve not only as transport hubs, but also as gateways for trade, industrial clusters and energy hubs, for example with regard to the deployment of off-shore wind installations
Amendment 399 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 (46) Being the entry and exit points for the land infrastructure of the trans- European transport network, maritime ports play an important role as cross-border multimodal nodes which serve not only as transport hubs, but also as gateways for trade, industrial clusters and energy hubs, for example with regard to the deployment of off-shore wind installations. Given the strategic role of ports for resilient supply chains, for the diversification of energy supply and for energy security, its importance for the respective Member State, in terms of cohesion, geopolitical position, energy transition and added- value to the region, should be considered in addition to traffic volumes for the inclusion in the TEN-T network;
Amendment 400 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 (46) Being the entry and exit points for the land infrastructure of the trans- European transport network, maritime ports play an important role as cross-border multimodal nodes which serve not only as transport hubs, but also as gateways for trade, industrial clusters and energy hubs, for example with regard to the deployment of off-shore wind installations. Given the strategic role of ports for resilient supply chains, for the diversification of energy supply and for energy security, its importance for the respective Member State, in terms of cohesion, geopolitical position, energy transition and added- value to the region, should be considered in addition to traffic volumes for the inclusion in the TEN-T network;
Amendment 401 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 (46) Being the entry and exit points for the land infrastructure of the trans- European transport network, maritime ports play an important role as cross-border multimodal nodes which serve not only as transport hubs, but also as gateways for trade, industrial clusters and energy hubs, for example with regard to the deployment of off-shore wind installations. Given the current clustering and merging of European port managing bodies in light of this multi-faceted role of maritime ports, maritime ports on the trans- European transport network that are managed by the same legal entity or have a single integrated economic plan should be considered as a single port for the purpose of this regulation.
Amendment 402 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 (46) Being the entry and exit points for the land infrastructure of the trans- European transport network, maritime ports play an important role as cross-border multimodal nodes which serve not only as transport hubs, but also as gateways for trade, industrial clusters and renewable energy hubs, for example with regard to the deployment of on-shore or off-shore wind installations. As such, their authorities should be duly involved within the governance of the TEN-T corridors. Moreover, infrastructure requirements for zero emission facilities s and full electrification at berth should be set by 2030.
Amendment 403 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 (46) Being the entry and exit points for the land infrastructure of the trans- European transport network, maritime ports play an important role as cross-border multimodal nodes which serve not only as transport hubs, but also as gateways for trade, industrial clusters and energy hubs, for example with regard to the deployment of on-shore and off-shore wind installations.
Amendment 404 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 a (new) (46a) The overall scale increase of the maritime and logistics sector, as well as the more extensive role of maritime ports has led to a clustering and merging of European port managing bodies, both of the comprehensive and of the core network. Maritime core and comprehensive ports which are managed by the same legal entity or have a single integrated economic plan, should be considered as a single port for the purpose of this regulation;
Amendment 405 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 a (new) (46a) The overall scale increase of the maritime and logistics sector, as well as the more extensive role of maritime ports has led to a clustering and merging of European port managing bodies, both of the comprehensive and of the core network. Maritime core and comprehensive ports which are managed by the same legal entity or have a single integrated economic plan, should be considered as a single port for the purpose of this regulation;
Amendment 406 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 a (new) (46a) Maritime ports play a key role in the import, export, storage, distribution and production of energy. Synergies between TEN-T and TEN-E should be maximised to ensure the coherence and comprehensiveness of the networks. The importance of maritime ports for energy security, energy supply and distribution should be considered when assessing their role for the TEN-T network;
Amendment 407 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 a (new) (46a) Maritime ports play a key role in the import, export, storage, distribution and production of energy. Synergies between TEN-T and TEN-E should be maximised to ensure the coherence and comprehensiveness of the networks. The importance of maritime ports for energy security, energy supply and distribution should be considered when assessing their role for the TEN-T network;
Amendment 408 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 a (new) (46a) Maritime ports play a key role in the import, export, storage, distribution, production and security of supply of energy that should be considered when assessing their role in the network. Synergies between TEN-T and TEN-E should be maximised to ensure the coherence and comprehensiveness of the networks;
Amendment 409 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 a (new) (46a) Maritime ports play a key role in the import, export, storage, distribution, production and security of supply of energy that should be considered when assessing their role in the network. Synergies between TEN-T and TEN-E should be maximised to ensure the coherence and comprehensiveness of the networks;
Amendment 410 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 a (new) (46a) Maritime ports play a key role in the import, export, storage, distribution, production and security of supply of energy that should be considered when assessing their role in the network. Synergies between TEN-T and TEN-E should be maximised to ensure the coherence and comprehensiveness of the networks;
Amendment 411 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 b (new) (46b) Maritime ports play a key role in the import, export, storage, distribution and production of energy. Synergies between TEN-T and TEN-E should be maximised to ensure the coherence and comprehensiveness of the networks. The importance of maritime ports for energy security, energy supply and distribution should be considered when assessing their role for the TEN-T network;
Amendment 412 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 a (new) (46a) Maritime ports have a strategic role in the logistics supply chain, the diversification of energy supply and storage and consequently, in EU's strategic autonomy. They are also crucial in geopolitical and cohesion terms, something which should be considered in addition to traffic volumes for their identification in the TEN-T network.
Amendment 413 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 a (new) (46a) Maritime ports play a crucial role in the import, export, storage, distribution, production, and security of energy supply, which should be considered when assessing their role in the network.
Amendment 414 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 a (new) (46a) Maritime seaports are clean energy hubs of the future and important facilitators of the energy transition across Europe. In their role as energy hubs, maritime seaports play a key role in realising the EU’s climate objectives for 2030 and 2050, as well as the ambitions outlined in the REPowerEU plan.
Amendment 415 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 46 b (new) (46b) Maritime seaports increasingly take up new responsibilities and are involved in new services, such as sustainable energy production, research on the blue economy, and military mobility. In their role as multi-service actors, maritime seaports can substantially contribute to a sustainable, digital and resilient European economy.
Amendment 416 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 (47) Short sea shipping can make a substantial contribution to the decarbonisation of transport by carrying more freight and passengers. The European Maritime Space should be promoted by creating or upgrading short-sea shipping routes and by developing maritime ports and their hinterland connections as to provide an efficient and sustainable integration with other modes of transport. Moreover, the new concept of the European Maritime Space brings the opportunity to regain and update for the maritime dimension the original policy approach to Motorways of the Sea, first introduced in the trans-European transport network regulation with the Decision 884/2004/EC, as sustainable short sea shipping links within the European Maritime Space intended to concentrate flows of freight on sea-based logistical routes in such a way as to improve existing maritime links or to establish new viable, regular and frequent maritime links so as to reduce road congestion in the EU territory and/or improve access to peripheral and island regions and States.
Amendment 417 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 (47) Short sea shipping can make a substantial contribution to the decarbonisation of transport by carrying
Amendment 418 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 (47) Short sea shipping can make a substantial contribution to the decarbonisation of transport by carrying more freight and passengers. The European Maritime Space should be promoted by creating or upgrading short-sea shipping routes and by developing maritime ports and their hinterland connections as to provide an efficient and sustainable integration with other modes of transport. Short sea shipping development in the European Union waters within the TEN-T network should not lead to social dumping.
Amendment 419 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 47 a (new) (47a) Clustering and cooperation of geographically near ports can bring aggregated operational benefits for the network and provide additional resilience. Fully merged ports with a single economic integrated plan and ports managed by the same legal entity could be recognised within the network as a single port with different facilities. The different locations of a fully merged port should in principle have an equal position and importance within the relevant corridors.
Amendment 420 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Road transport in the Union accounts for three-quarters of the total inland freight transport (based on tonne- kilometres performed) and for around 90% of the total inland passenger transport (based on the total number of passenger kilometres).
Amendment 421 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Road transport in the Union accounts for three-quarters of the total inland freight transport (based on tonne- kilometres performed) and for around 90% of the total inland passenger transport (based on the total number of passenger kilometres). Given the importance of road transport
Amendment 422 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 (48) Road transport in the Union accounts for three-quarters of the total inland freight transport (based on tonne- kilometres performed) and for around 90% of the total inland passenger transport (based on the total number of passenger kilometres). Given the importance of road transport and the commitment to improve road safety in line with the milestone of the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy and the Vision Zero strategy, there is a need to enhance the road infrastructure from the safety point of view, particularly for vulnerable road users, without increasing its capacity, as it generates induced demand. The introduction of Intelligent Transport Systems technologies allows for capacity management, such as dosage or slots system for freight traffic to avoid congestion.
Amendment 423 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 48 a (new) (48a) The Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy moreover sets concrete targets for modal shift from road to rail, as well as to inland waterways, for both 2030 and 2050.
Amendment 424 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) The trans-European transport network should ensure efficient multimodality, including road transport, in order to allow
Amendment 425 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) The trans-European transport network should ensure efficient multimodality in order to allow better and more sustainable modal choices to be made for passengers and freight, based on accurate information and comparison of the respective modes' emissions intensity, and in order to enable large volumes to be consolidated for transfers over long distances, in particular by rail. Multimodal terminals should play a key role to meet this objective. 90% of combined transport has a cross-border component. Multimodal hubs, connecting rail with other modes, should play a key role to meet this objective. Rail freight transport is on average seven times more energy efficient in terms of ton-kilometre than truck transport, in addition to being, in general, zero-emission, while the energy intensity per passenger of collective land transport modes, namely rail and bus, is far better than for private vehicles.
Amendment 426 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) The trans-European transport
Amendment 427 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 a (new) (49a) In order to guarantee access to adequate resting facilities for professional drivers Members States should do their utmost to deploy a sufficient number of safe and secure parking areas for commercial vehicles along the whole TEN-Network in the European Union.
Amendment 428 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 a (new) (49a) The trans-European transport network should maintain the smooth flow of goods, ensuring that the free movement of heavy goods vehicles is not hampered by bottlenecks or bans of any kind.
Amendment 429 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 (50) Urban nodes play an important role on the trans-European transport network as starting point or final destination ("last mile") for passengers and freight moving on the trans-European transport network and are points of transfer within or between different transport modes. All modes of transport should be treated on an equal footing. It should be ensured that capacity bottlenecks and an insufficient network connectivity within urban nodes do no longer hamper multimodality. Instead, urban nodes should primarily focus on promoting a seamless, multimodal movement of goods and passengers along the trans-European transport network.
Amendment 430 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 (50) Urban nodes play an important role on the trans-European transport network as starting point or final destination ("last mile") for passengers and freight moving on the trans-European transport network and are points of transfer within or between different transport modes, and to local and regional transportation. It should be ensured that capacity bottlenecks and an insufficient network connectivity within urban nodes do no longer hamper multimodality along the trans-European transport network. Member States shall also ensure that urban nodes significantly increase the modal share of sustainable transport modes within set time-frames, such as public transport, active modes and electric micro mobility.
Amendment 431 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 a (new) (50a) The cases of extremely long border waiting times for road freight transport cause the disruption of urban mobility systems and all types of transport. Such occurrences negatively affecting border towns and areas and has direct impact on air quality and noise pollution while deteriorating health of European citizens, increasing the risk of road accidents, damaging the infrastructure, leading to poor working conditions for heavy duty vehicles' drivers and undermining fair business conditions.
Amendment 432 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 a (new) (50a) Urban hubs should play a key role in improving interconnections between ports and road and rail networks through the development of an appropriately integrated and innovative system of smart logistics.
Amendment 433 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 a (new) (50a) A sufficient number of safe and secure parking areas for commercial vehicles should be available, via the use of a gradual approach, on the core and extended core networks by 2035 and on the comprehensive network by 2040.
Amendment 434 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 a (new) (50a) A sufficient number of safe and secure parking areas for commercial vehicles should be available, via the use of a gradual approach on the core, extended core, and comprehensive networks of the TEN-T.
Amendment 435 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) As an effective single framework for tackling urban mobility challenges, urban nodes should develop a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP), which is a long-term, all-encompassing integrated freight and passenger mobility plan for the entire functional urban area22 . It should include objectives, targets and indicators underpinning the current and future performance of the urban transport system, at minimum, on greenhouse gas emissions, in total and for the different transport modes, air quality, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access
Amendment 436 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) As an effective single framework for tackling urban mobility challenges, urban nodes should develop a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP), which is a long-term, all-encompassing integrated freight and passenger mobility plan for the entire functional urban area22 . It should include objectives, targets and indicators underpinning the current and future performance of the urban transport system, at minimum, on greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access to mobility services, as well as data on air and noise pollution in
Amendment 437 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) As an effective single framework for tackling urban mobility challenges, urban nodes should develop a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP), which is a long-term, all-encompassing integrated freight and passenger mobility plan for the entire functional urban area22 . Coordination and harmonisation of SUMPs should be encouraged. It should include objectives, targets and indicators underpinning the current and future performance of the urban transport system, at minimum, on greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access to mobility services, as well as data on air and noise pollution in cities. __________________ 22 The SUMP concept was first proposed in
Amendment 438 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) As an effective single framework for tackling urban mobility challenges, urban nodes should develop a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP), which is a long-term, all-encompassing integrated freight and passenger mobility plan for the entire functional urban area22 . Coordination and harmonisation of SUMPs should be encouraged. It should include objectives, targets and indicators underpinning the current and future performance of the urban transport system, at minimum, on greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access to mobility services, as well as data on air and noise pollution in cities. __________________ 22 The SUMP concept was first proposed in
Amendment 439 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 a (new) (51a) SUMPs should foster a greater uptake of public transport, through an adequate network, as well as enable and promote active mobility and electric micro mobility.
Amendment 440 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 52 (52) Member States should establish a national SUMP support programme aimed at promoting the uptake of SUMPs and improving coordination among regions, cities and towns. It should support regions and urban areas to develop high-quality SUMPs and reinforce monitoring and evaluation of the SUMP implementation through legislative measures, guidance, capacity building, assistance and possibly financial support. The Commission should extend the current list of urban nodes to include additional cities located on the TEN-T corridors and to provide more technical and financial support to help new urban nodes create and update their SUMPs; local authorities involvement in the governance of TEN-T corridors and the definition of relevant criteria to assess SUMPs should be improved through the creation of collaboration mechanisms.
Amendment 441 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 52 (52) Member States should establish a national SUMP support programme aimed at promoting the uptake of SUMPs and improving coordination among regions, cities and towns. It should support regions and urban areas to develop high-quality SUMPs and reinforce monitoring and evaluation of the SUMP implementation through legislative measures, guidance, capacity building, assistance and possibly financial support. The Commission can update the list of urban nodes in Annex II at the request of a Member State, previous agreement with the urban nodes concerned and its relevant authorities, with the aim of improving territorial balance and accelerating the transition to a more sustainable mobility. The Commission should facilitate exchanges of best practices and lessons learnt between urban nodes along the network.
Amendment 442 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 52 (52) Member States should establish a national SUMP support programme aimed at promoting the uptake of SUMPs and improving coordination among regions,
Amendment 443 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 52 (52) Member States should establish a national SUMP support programme aimed at promoting the uptake of SUMPs and improving coordination among regions, cities and towns. It should support regions and urban areas to develop high-quality SUMPs and reinforce monitoring and evaluation of the SUMP implementation through legislative measures, guidance, capacity building, assistance and possibly financial support. To complement the support provided by national support programmes, the European Commission facilitates exchanges between nodes in "corridor forums".
Amendment 444 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 52 a (new) (52a) The Commission should establish an EU SUMP support programme, aimed at ensuring the quality of the national SUMP support programmes, offering guidance where needed. The Commission should also create an urban node forum for purposes of information sharing, for example of best practices, and exchanges of experiences across the urban nodes in the Union.
Amendment 445 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) Multimodal digital mobility services help to enhance the integration of the different transport modes by combining several transport offers into one. Their further development should contribute to nudge behaviours towards
Amendment 446 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) Multimodal digital mobility services help to enhance the integration of the different transport modes by combining several transport offers into one. Their further development should contribute to nudge behaviours towards the most sustainable modes, namely public transport and active modes such as walking and cycling.
Amendment 447 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) Multimodal digital mobility services help to enhance the integration of the different transport modes by combining several transport offers into one. Their further development should contribute to nudge behaviours towards the most sustainable modes, public transport and active modes such as walking and cycling. Highlights that urban infrastructure planning should be developed in accordance with EU standards on road safety, including standards for safety of cycling and walking infrastructure and other active modes of transport(pedestrian and cycling tracks, lanes, bridges, tunnels, parking areas and fast recharging points for light means of transport batteries) to increase the shift to more sustainable modes of transport.
Amendment 448 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 55 a (new) (55a) Passenger traffic and numbers of passengers on TEN-T corridors will need to increase. Passengers should have a seamless user experience when searching, selecting and buying their railway services. In order to achieve seamless ticketing, sector-based solutions should be supported and considered as the starting point when improving multimodal ticketing.
Amendment 449 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 56 (56) Intelligent transport systems and services as well as new emerging technologies should serve as a catalyst for the deployment of intelligent transport systems and services on all roads of the trans-European transport network, including the dynamic adaptation to lower speeds when atmospheric conditions require it or for energy-saving purposes. They also are also an important tool for duly internalising the current externalities of the different transport modes, for instance by enabling accurate distance- based road charges or carbon taxes.
Amendment 450 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 57 (57) Adequate planning of the trans- European transport network is required. This also entails the implementation of specific requirements throughout the network in terms of infrastructure, ICT systems, equipment and services, including the requirements for the alternative fuel infrastructure rollout as defined in Regulation (EU) […] of the European Parliament and of the Council [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure]23 . It is therefore necessary to ensure adequate and concerted deployment of such requirements across Europe for each transport mode and for their interconnection across the trans- European transport network and beyond, in order to obtain the benefits of the network effect and to make efficient sustainable long-range trans-European transport operations possible. In order to ensure the deployment of alternative fuels across the entire road network of the trans-European transport network in line with the targets set in Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure], references to ‘core network’ in Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] should be construed as references to ‘core network’ as defined in this Regulation. References to ‘comprehensive network’ in Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] should be construed as references to ‘extended core network’ and ‘comprehensive network’ as defined in this Regulation. __________________ 23 Regulation of the European Parliament
Amendment 451 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 58 (58) The trans-European transport network should provide the basis for the large-scale deployment of new technologies and innovation, such as 5G infrastructure, which can help enhance the overall efficiency of the European transport sector and capacity to enable secure passenger flows using efficient means, make public
Amendment 452 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 58 (58) The trans-European transport network should provide the basis for the large-scale deployment of new technologies and innovation,
Amendment 453 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 59 (59) A sufficient number of fast recharging points for light and heavy-duty vehicles accessible to the public should be deployed across the trans-European transport network without delay. This aim should ensure full cross-border connectivity and allow electric and hydrogen vehicles to circulate throughout the Union. Distance-based targets for the trans-
Amendment 454 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 59 (59) A sufficient number of fast recharging points for light and heavy-duty vehicles accessible to the public should be deployed across the trans-European transport network without delay. This aim should ensure full cross-border connectivity and allow electric vehicles to circulate throughout the Union. Distance- based targets for the trans-
Amendment 455 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 59 (59) A sufficient number of fast recharging points for light and heavy-duty vehicles accessible to the public should be deployed across the trans-European
Amendment 456 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 59 a (new) (59a) The TEN-T Core Network should remain the backbone for the deployment of LNG infrastructure, and progressively for liquefied biomethane (bio-LNG), as it covers the main traffic flows and allows cross border connectivity throughout the Union. Member States should make sure that public refuelling facilities are set up, at least along the existing TEN-T Core Network, within adequate distances taking into account the minimum range of (bio- )LNG heavy-duty motor vehicles and vessels, while developing national networks for the supply of (bio-)LNG to those vehicles and vessels.
Amendment 457 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 59 a (new) (59a) A sufficient number of hydrogen refuelling points for light and heavy-duty vehicles accessible to the public should be deployed across the trans-European transport network without delay. This aim should ensure full cross-border connectivity and allow hydrogen vehicles to circulate throughout the Union. Distance-based targets for the trans- European transport network as defined in Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] are to ensure a minimum of sufficient coverage of hydrogen refuelling points along the Union’s main road networks.
Amendment 458 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 59 a (new) (59a) It will be important to support the effective rollout in Member States of the recharging and refuelling infrastructure. This will require coordination amongst all stakeholders, including by European, national, and regional institutions, trade unions, and the industry.
Amendment 459 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 59 b (new) (59b) Sustainable alternative fuels and their infrastructure play a key role in this transition. A swift and continuous roll-out of alternative fuels infrastructure is a fundamental prerequisite to support and further boost the market uptake of sustainable vehicles, vessels and transport solutions. It is therefore crucial to enable sufficient levels of deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure and incentivise investments in sustainable technologies. The investment decisions that will be taken in the near future will be instrumental to put the transport sector on the right path in its ongoing transition and to ensure that it sufficiently contributes to reducing the Union’s GHG emissions by 55 percent by 2030 and to net-zero by 2050.
Amendment 460 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 59 b (new) (59b) In the heavy-duty road transport sector, multiple solutions will be needed to cover different market needs and transport scenarios. While electrification is one of the future applications to abate emissions in the long term, more developed renewable alternatives must be used to cover long-haulage transport needs. LNG technology is mature and the fleet running on bio-LNG is expected to significantly grow in the near future. Additionally, bio-LNG can be easily transported, stored, and directly injected into the LNG refuelling infrastructure present throughout the TEN-T network with little to no modification.
Amendment 461 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 59 b (new) (59b) An appropriate number of refuelling points including for carbon- neutral liquid and gaseous fuels for light and heavy-duty vehicles should be established or maintained across the trans-European transport network. It should be ensured that alternatively fuelled vehicles can circulate throughout the Union.
Amendment 462 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 59 c (new) (59c) In order to guarantee a full cross- border connectivity especially for light and heavy duty vehicles, Member States should ensure that a sufficient number of hydrogen refuelling points for light and heavy-duty vehicles accessible to the public is deployed across the TEN-T network as defined in Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure]. A sufficient coverage of hydrogen refuelling points along the Union’s main road networks should allow hydrogen vehicles to circulate throughout the Union.
Amendment 463 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 59 c (new) (59c) As there is currently no economically viable zero-emission powertrain technology available, a variety of fuels and propulsion systems will be needed for the decarbonisation of the maritime industry. With an always growing LNG fleet in operation, LNG, and progressively bio-LNG, is likely to play a continued role in maritime transport, where LNG offers immediate local emissions improvements and GHG reductions, enabling the shipping industry to start immediately its transition to carbon neutrality.
Amendment 464 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 60 (60) Publicly accessible recharging and refuelling infrastructure along the trans- European transport network as defined in Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] should be complemented with requirements on the deployment of recharging and refuelling infrastructure in multimodal terminals and for multimodal passenger hubs, to provide charging and refuelling opportunities for long haul trucks when they are being loaded or unloaded or when the driver is taking a rest or for busses in multimodal passenger hubs. In order to ensure free circulation, where the terminals or passenger hubs receive Union or public support, the access for purposes of charging and refuelling, should be on fair, affordable, transparent and non- discriminatory basis, so as to avoid market lock in for specific enterprises or possible distortions of competition. Pricing should be made on transparent and non- discriminatory basis for all authorised undertakings or persons, where the charging and refuelling infrastructure is build using
Amendment 465 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 60 (60) Publicly accessible recharging infrastructure along the trans-European transport network as defined in Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] should be complemented with requirements on the deployment of recharging infrastructure in multimodal terminals and for multimodal passenger hubs, to provide charging opportunities for long haul trucks when they are being loaded or unloaded or when the driver is taking a rest or for busses in multimodal passenger hubs. In order to ensure free circulation, where the terminals or passenger hubs receive Union or public support, the access for purposes of charging, should be on fair, transparent and non-discriminatory basis, so as to avoid market lock in for specific enterprises or possible distortions of competition. Pricing should be made on transparent and non- discriminatory basis for all authorised undertakings or persons
Amendment 466 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 60 a (new) (60a) The Commission should closely monitor the fulfilment of the obligations of Member States laid down in this Regulation, especially regarding the installation of publicly accessible charging and refuelling points across their territory. In the case of a breach of Union law, the Commission should take all necessary steps, including infringement procedure in accordance with Article 258 TFEU, in order to guarantee the harmonised deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure rules in the Union.
Amendment 467 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 61 (61) Insufficient safety, security and reliability of the infrastructure, caused by natural hazards, including climate related events and other exceptional occurrences such as pandemics, human-made disasters such as accidents, or disruptions caused by intentional acts such as terrorism and cyber-attacks, is a major problem for the efficiency and functioning of the trans- European transport network. For instance, accidents caused by several natural disasters due to extreme weather events have interrupted the transport flows significantly in the past years. The resilience of the transport network to climate change, natural hazards, human- made disasters and other disruptions should
Amendment 468 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) Taking stock of the experience with regard to the crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic25 and in order to avoid traffic disruptions and contingencies in future, Member States should take into account the security and resilience of the transport infrastructure to climate change, natural hazards, human-made disasters and other disruptions affecting the functioning of the Union transport system, when planning infrastructure. To that aim, the European Transport Corridors should also include important diversionary lines and double-track railway infrastructure in cross-border capacity barriers, which can be used in case of congestion or other problems on the principal routes. In addition, due to their multimodal nature, one mode can substitute the other in case of emergencies.
Amendment 469 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) Taking stock of the experience with regard to the crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic25 and in order to avoid traffic disruptions and contingencies in future, Member States should take into account the security and resilience of the transport infrastructure to climate change, natural hazards, human-made disasters and other disruptions affecting the functioning of the Union transport system, when planning infrastructure. To that aim, other criteria beyond traffic volumes should be considered, and the European Transport Corridors should also include important diversionary lines which can be used in case of congestion or other problems on the principal routes. In addition, due to their multimodal nature, one mode can substitute the other in case of emergencies.
Amendment 470 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) Taking stock of the experience with regard to the crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic25 and in order to avoid traffic disruptions and contingencies in future, Member States should take into account the security and resilience of the transport infrastructure to climate change, natural hazards, human-made disasters and other disruptions affecting the functioning of the Union transport system, when planning infrastructure. To that aim, other criteria beyond traffic volumes should be considered and the European Transport Corridors should also include important diversionary lines which can be used in case of congestion or other problems on the principal routes. In addition, due to their multimodal nature, one mode can substitute the other in case of emergencies.
Amendment 471 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) Taking stock of the experience with regard to the crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic25 and in order to avoid traffic disruptions and contingencies in future, Member States should take into account the security and resilience of the transport infrastructure to climate change, natural hazards, human-made disasters and other disruptions affecting the functioning of the Union transport system, when planning infrastructure. To that aim, other criteria beyond traffic volumes should be considered and the European Transport Corridors should also include important diversionary lines which can be used in case of congestion or other
Amendment 472 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) Taking stock of the experience with regard to the crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic25 and in order to avoid traffic disruptions and contingencies in future, Member States should take into account the security and resilience of the transport infrastructure to climate change, natural hazards, human-made disasters and
Amendment 473 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) Taking stock of the experience with regard to the crisis management during the
Amendment 474 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 a (new) (62a) In light of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine, and the subsequent world’s energy system disruption, Member States should take into account EU energy security and independence, and other possible disruptions affecting the functioning of the Union and of its transport system, when planning infrastructure. To that aim, Member States should promote and preserve the EU strategic autonomy in the energy sector by implementing policies that support the power sources produced and technologies developed in the EU, all activities creating jobs in the internal market.
Amendment 475 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 64 (64) While maintenance is and will remain the main responsibility of the Member States, it is important that the trans-European transport network – once built – is properly maintained to ensure a high quality of services. A life cycle approach should be followed when planning and procuring infrastructure projects, including calculations on overall emissions and energy savings, and the Member States shall remain obligated to ensure the maintenance of the TEN-T network in their country, with as limited impact on the traffic flow as possible, including for cross-border sections where Member States shall coordinate with each other for maintenance needs.
Amendment 476 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 64 (64) While maintenance is and will remain the main responsibility of the Member States, it is important that the trans-European transport network – once built – is properly maintained to ensure a high quality of services. A life cycle approach should be followed when planning and procuring infrastructure projects. Maintenance works that result in a limitation or non-availability of rail infrastructure should be managed according to the rules stated in Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/2075.
Amendment 477 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 64 (64) While maintenance is and will remain the main responsibility of the Member States, it is important that the trans-European transport network – once built – is properly maintained to ensure a high quality of services. A life cycle approach should be followed when planning and procuring infrastructure projects. Maintenance works should be conducted in compliance with Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/2075.
Amendment 478 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 64 (64) While maintenance is and will remain the main responsibility of the Member States, it is important that the trans-European transport network – once built – is properly maintained to ensure a high quality of services. A life cycle approach should be followed when planning and procuring infrastructure projects. Maintenance works should be conducted in compliance with Commission Delegated Decision (EU)2017/2075.
Amendment 479 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 65 (65) In order to implement parts of the trans-European transport network of highest strategic importance within the given timescale, a corridor approach should be used as an instrument to coordinate different projects on a transnational basis and to synchronise the development of the corridor, thereby maximising network benefits. The goal of the transport corridors is to increase overall efficiency of the whole network, beyond simple gains in the main corridor axis. Therefore, investment distribution between the corridors and the rest of the network need to be balanced, with at least 15% of the funding under the Connecting Europe Facility being devoted to projects outside the main corridors.
Amendment 480 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 65 a (new) (65a) Taking into account the considerable costs for the completion of the TEN-T, other sources of co-funding must be available, including among others Recovery and Resilience Facility, Cohesion Fund, European Regional Development.
Amendment 481 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 65 b (new) (65b) Whereas the Smart and Sustainable Mobility Strategy sets ambitious targets in terms of high speed network [doubling high-speed rail traffic volume by 2030 and tripling it by 2050], the TEN-T Regulation should focus among others on ensuring the rail high- speed connectivity between capitals and major cities of Europe.
Amendment 482 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 66 (66) European Transport Corridors should help to develop the infrastructure of the trans-European transport network in such a way as to address bottlenecks, enhance cross-border connections and improve efficiency and sustainability.
Amendment 483 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 66 (66) European Transport Corridors should help to develop the infrastructure of the trans-European transport network in such a way as to address bottlenecks, enhance cross-border connections and improve efficiency and sustainability. They should contribute to cohesion through improved territorial cooperation. They should also address wider transport policy objectives and facilitate interoperability, modal integration and multimodal operations. The corridor approach should be transparent and clear and the management of such corridors should not create additional administrative burdens or costs. The European Transport Coordinators should also encourage the establishment of integrated management structures, including joint ventures, aimed at speeding the implementation of cross- border infrastructure projects.
Amendment 484 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 66 (66) European Transport Corridors should help to develop the infrastructure of the trans-European transport network in such a way as to address bottlenecks, enhance cross-border connections, in particular for rail, and improve efficiency and sustainability. They should contribute to cohesion through improved territorial cooperation. They should also address wider transport policy objectives and facilitate interoperability, modal integration and multimodal operations. The corridor approach should be transparent and clear and the management of such corridors should not create additional administrative burdens or costs.
Amendment 485 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 66 a (new) (66a) One of the main objectives of the TEN-T regulation should be to fill gaps, remove bottlenecks and technical barriers, and strengthen social, economic and territorial cohesion in the EU. The implementation of the TEN-T network creates the infrastructure conditions to make transport more sustainable and achieve climate objectives. Ten-T are the main networks on which goods and passengers are transported in the EU. The European Transport Corridors should be the network of the highest strategic importance for the development of sustainable and multimodal freight and passenger flows in Europe.
Amendment 486 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 66 b (new) (66b) There are still many gaps in between the corridors, also especially for example in the Rhine-Danube corridor. Filling the gap between the metropolitan areas of Nuremberg / Germany and Prague / Czech Republic via Amberg- Schwandorf in Germany would be the most efficient solution. This would bring enormous benefits, especially in the rail passenger and freight sector. The additional electrification via Schwandorf – Amberg could in particular alleviate the existing accessibility deficits in the central and northern Upper Palatinate.
Amendment 487 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 (67) In agreement with the Member
Amendment 488 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 a (new) (67a) EU border regions cover 40% of the EU's territory and account for 30% of the EU's population. By connecting border regions more effectively the EU will become more integrated in a tangible way and offer citizens the possibility of enjoying sustainable cross-border mobility services. European Transport Coordinators should analyse mobility needs in EU cross-border regions and in coordination with the relevant regional and local authorities, and should establish "cross-border mobility plans". These plans should include targeted measures to improve the coordination and frequency of rail and public transport services between these regions, address missing links and bottlenecks, enhance the performance of services and the capacity of the infrastructures and improve the affordability of the cross-border services.
Amendment 489 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 a (new) (67a) For the purpose of this structured dialogue and in the absence of any viable logistical and modal transport alternatives, the Commission should discourage Member States from unilaterally creating cross-border barriers of any kind along the network, in particular at central hubs, in order to avoid obstructing border transit.
Amendment 490 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 a (new) (67a) In the context of this structured dialogue, and in the absence of viable logistical and modal alternatives, the Commission should take measures to deter Member States from engaging in unilateral cross border restrictions along the Corridors, to avoid hindering cross- border transit of persons, services or goods.
Amendment 491 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 69 (69) The work plans of the European Coordinators should be used to promote cooperation between all relevant stakeholders, to strengthen complementarity with actions by Member States
Amendment 492 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 69 (69) The work plans of the European Coordinators should be used to promote cooperation between all relevant stakeholders, including regional and local stakeholders, to strengthen complementarity with actions by Member States and infrastructure managers, including port authorities, mainly but not only within the dedicated forums for each corridor and horizontal priorities, and in particular to set the milestones and priorities for investments. Based on the work plans, the Commission should adopt implementing acts setting out the priorities for infrastructure planning and for funding.
Amendment 493 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 69 (69) The work plans of the European Coordinators should be used to promote cooperation between all relevant stakeholders, to strengthen complementarity with actions by Member States and infrastructure managers and in particular to set the milestones and priorities for investments. Based on the work plans, the Commission should adopt implementing acts setting out the priorities for infrastructure planning and for funding
Amendment 494 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 69 a (new) (69a) The Connecting Europe Facility should act in an even more effective manner as financial incentive to bridge the gap between different national approaches, contributing to align priority levels and timelines of a certain cross- border project or segment, while ensuring at the same time a fair distribution of funding and avoiding the creation of perverse incentives to not progress promptly.
Amendment 495 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 70 (70) The
Amendment 496 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 70 a (new) (70a) Rail passenger services should become a more attractive option for longer-distance journeys and rail high speed services have proven in many European countries their attractiveness. While being easier to use and 15 times more energy efficient, high-speed rail services are superior in terms of duration, convenience and comfort of traveling, up to distances of 1200 km versus other modes of transport. The European distances are particularly suitable to this mode of transport and most EU Capitals, major cities and metropolitan areas could be interconnected thanks to high speed. However, the current European network is fragmented and mainly made up of “national high-speed islands” and there is an urgent need to develop a EU High- Speed Network with a larger number of connections between all EU Capitals, major cities and metropolitan areas. This is vital to reach the objective of the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy which aims to double High Speed rail traffic by 2030 and triple by 2050. The advantages of high-speed rail versus other transport modes are as follows: 1. transport capacity : high-capacity transport capable of covering long distances, 2. energy consumption : extremely low energy consumption per passenger, 3. emissions : extremely low emission footprint in case of electric traction, 4. Permanent noise pollution : significantly better parameters than road and aviation transport, 5. infrastructure spatial requirements :significantly lower space demand (per transported volume) than road transport,6. travel comfort : being able to provide a very high standard, 7. travel time: up to 1200 km, High Speed Rail can successfully compete with air transport,8. Safety: high-speed rail is one of the safest modes to travel.
Amendment 497 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 (71) Taking into account the Union Action Plan on Military Mobility of March 201827 the Commission should assess the need to adapt the trans-European transport network to reflect the military use of the infrastructure. Based on the gap analysis between the trans-European transport network and the military requirements28 additional roads
Amendment 498 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 (71) Taking into account the Union Action Plan on Military Mobility of March 201827 the Commission should assess the need to adapt the trans-European transport network to reflect the military use of the infrastructure. Based on the gap analysis between the trans-European transport network and the military requirements28 additional roads
Amendment 499 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 (71) Taking into account the Union Action Plan on Military Mobility of March
Amendment 500 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 (71) Taking into account the Union Action Plan on Military Mobility of March 201827 the Commission should assess the need to adapt the trans-European transport network to reflect the military use of the infrastructure. Based on the gap analysis between the trans-European transport network and the military requirements28
Amendment 501 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 a (new) (71a) The extensive infrastructure needed for a seamless Union cross-border transport, and rail in particular, will not be achieved properly if requirements are not matched with the same ambition in terms of investments, also beyond the multiannual financing framework of 2021-2027. Connecting Europe Facility III needs to represent a magnitude leap in co-funding maintained in subsequent generations of the program in order to adequately address these needs in due time according to the deadlines within this Regulation.
Amendment 502 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 a (new) (71a) High-capacity or European Modular Concept vehicles should be allowed to operate on the entire TEN-T network, including between like-minded Member States. The use of such vehicle combinations can reduce the number of trucks on the road, overall fuel consumption and, thereby, CO2 emissions by up to 35%. The use of EMC vehicles promotes intermodality between road, rail, and maritime transport.
Amendment 503 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 72 (72) In order to maximise consistency between the guidelines and the programming of the relevant financial instruments available at Union level, trans- European transport network funding should comply with this Regulation and be based, in particular, on Regulation (EU) No 2021/1153 of the European Parliament and of the Council29 . In addition, network funding should also build on funding and financing instruments provided under other Union law, including InvestEU, the Recovery and Resilience Facility,
Amendment 504 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 72 (72) In order to maximise consistency between the guidelines and the programming of the relevant financial instruments available at Union level, trans- European transport network funding should comply with this Regulation and be based, in particular, on Regulation (EU) No 2021/1153 of the European Parliament and of the Council29 . In addition, network
Amendment 505 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 72 a (new) (72a) The current budget of the Connecting Europe Facility 2021-2027 (CEF II) has proven insufficient given the rising needs of the transport sector and the new geopolitical context as well as the enhanced TEN-T infrastructure requirements. Furthermore, Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine has highlighted the importance to adapt parts of the TEN-T infrastructure, in particular critical infrastructure, to a dual use for civil and defence purposes. In consequence, an increase in the portion of the CEF for Transport dedicated to military mobility is needed with the aim of improving, among others, a seamless cross-border mobility of humanitarian transport. Taking into consideration all this context, the Commission and Member States should explore new funding opportunities and plan an ambitious successor programme to CEF II for the MFF post-2027, with reinforced funding.
Amendment 506 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 72 a (new) (72a) The share of the EU budget currently dedicated to transport infrastructures, including the Connecting European Facility, is insufficient to match the needs in terms of co-financing to meet the ambitious standards and deadlines of the Regulation. This miss- matching paired with the current level of inflation demands a forward-thinking approach. The Commission should, therefore, explore innovative funding options.
Amendment 507 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 72 a (new) (72a) The current budget of the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF II) is insufficient to co-fund the increasingly ambitious standards and deadlines of the TEN-T network. Member States and the Commission should explore new funding opportunities and ensure a balanced funding approach between transport modes and nodes.
Amendment 508 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 72 a (new) (72a) Agglomerations play a crucial role in the implementation of the European network, but this also means a major financial challenge.;
Amendment 509 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 73 a (new) (73a) In determining their expenditure and investment, for instance concerning the revenues generated from the auctioning of allowances in the Emissions Trading System (ETS), Member States should base their decisions on the energy efficiency first principle, namely prioritising transport infrastructure developments for modes with a clear added value in terms of environmental and social effects.
Amendment 510 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 74 (74) In order to update the maps and the list of ports, airports, terminals and urban nodes included in Annexes I and II to take into account possible changes resulting from the actual usage of certain elements of transport infrastructure analysed against pre-established quantitative thresholds, the power to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in respect of amendments to Annexes I and II. It is of particular importance that the Commission carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at expert level, and that those consultations be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down in the Interinstitutional Agreement of 13 April 2016 on Better Law-Making30 . In particular, to ensure equal participation in the preparation of delegated acts, the
Amendment 511 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 74 a (new) (74a) The inclusion of transport nodes (ports, airports, terminals and urban nodes) in Annexes I and II entails the application of other EU legal acts. In order to provide legal certainty and to enable long-term strategic planning, it is essential to keep the network as stable as possible and avoid exclusions. Consequently, where the established quantitative thresholds within the "planning methodology for the TEN-T" are no longer met, the Commission, shall initiate a monitoring procedure before any exclusion and shall take into account qualitative indicators such as the strategic location of the nodes and their contribution to the EU strategic autonomy, and any cyclical factors which may explain the decline in infrastructure traffic.
Amendment 512 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 74 a (new) (74a) The inclusion of ports, airports, terminals and urban nodes in Annexes I and II sets the application of other EU legislations. The network should, therefore, remain as stable as possible and avoid exclusions to ensure a sufficient level of legal certainty. Therefore, where the established quantitative thresholds are no longer met, the Commission, shall take into account qualitative indicators and any cyclical factors which may explain the decline in infrastructure traffic before excluding the infrastructure from the network;
Amendment 513 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 74 a (new) (74a) The inclusion of transport nodes, such as maritime ports, in the TEN-T network determines in many cases the scope and application of other European legislation. In order to provide legal certainty and to enable long-term strategic planning, it is essential to keep the network as stable as possible. In cases where quantitative thresholds are no longer met, the node’s development plan or prognosis should be considered prior to removal from the network, as well as its geopolitical importance or role in the supply of energy.
Amendment 514 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 74 a (new) (74a) The inclusion of transport nodes, such as maritime ports, in the TEN-T network determines in many cases the scope and application of other European legislation. In order to provide legal certainty and to enable long-term strategic planning, it is essential to keep the network as stable as possible. In cases where quantative thresholds are no longer met, the node’s development plan or prognosis should be considered prior to removal from the network, as well as its geopolitical importance or role in the supply of energy.
Amendment 515 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 74 a (new) (74a) Maritime ports play a key role in transport connectivity, logistics, imports and export and cohesion. However, ports are also important for emergency supply chains, energy security, security of supply as well as renewable energy production and supply. Furthermore, strategic geopolitical aspects and military mobility are also increasingly relevant. Therefore, other criteria beyond quantitative passenger traffic and cargo volumes should be considered in the TEN-T methodology, especially prior to removing a port from the TEN-T network.
Amendment 516 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards implementing acts
Amendment 517 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards implementing acts which specify reference water levels and minimum requirements per
Amendment 518 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 77 (77) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission as regards implementing acts which specify reference water levels and minimum requirements per
Amendment 519 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 a (new) (81a) Taking into account the considerable costs for the completion of the TEN-T, other sources of co-funding must be available, including Recovery and Resilience Facility, Cohesion Fund, European Regional Development Fund, Horizon Europe and European Structural, Investment Funds as well as Emissions Trading System(ETS). National Funds are key in ensuring the timely completion of TEN-T. Each Funding Programme shall clearly prioritize its financing objectives.
Amendment 520 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 a (new) Amendment 521 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 a (new) (81a) Rail is energy-efficient which carries 4 times more passengers per unit of energy than the cars and even 8 times more than the planes32b, High-Speed Rail will help in facing the future energy challenges. __________________ 32b The International Association of Railways (UIC)
Amendment 522 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 b (new) (81b) The energy efficiency first principle must guide Member States in determining the use of revenues generated from the auctioning of allowances in the new ETS for road transport. This energy- efficiency first principle should be applied in prioritising transport infrastructure development and ETS revenues to be used for infrastructure investments with a clear benefit on environmental and social effects.
Amendment 523 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 b (new) (81b) Rail is safe which causes 28 times less passenger fatalities than the cars in the EU32c, High-Speed Rail can contribute to the vision of the EU to reach zero road fatalities by 2050. __________________ 32c The European Union Agency for Railways (ERA, 2019)
Amendment 524 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 c (new) (81c) Rail passenger services should become a more attractive option for longer-distance journeys and rail high speed services have proven in many European countries their attractiveness. While being easier to use and 15 times more energy efficient, high-speed rail services are superior in terms of duration, convenience and comfort of traveling, up to distances of 1200 km versus other modes of transport. The European distances are particularly suitable to this mode of transport and most EU Capitals, major cities and metropolitan areas could be interconnected thanks to high speed. However, the current European network is fragmented and mainly made up of “national high-speed islands” and there is an urgent need to develop a EU High- Speed Network with a larger number of connections between all EU Capitals, major cities and metropolitan areas. This is vital to reach the objective of the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy which aims to double High Speed rail traffic by 2030 and triple by 2050. The advantages of high-speed rail versus other transport modes are as follows: 1. transport capacity : high-capacity transport capable of covering long distances, 2. energy consumption : extremely low energy consumption per passenger, 3. emissions : extremely low emission footprint in case of electric traction, 4. Permanent noise pollution : significantly better parameters than road and aviation transport, 5. infrastructure spatial requirements : significantly lower space demand (per transported volume) than road transport, 6. travel comfort : being able to provide a very high standard, 7. travel time : up to 1200 km, High Speed Rail can successfully compete with air transport, 8. Safety: high-speed rail is one of the safest modes to travel.
Amendment 525 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 c (new) (81c) The Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy sets the milestone of doubling high-speed rail traffic by 2030, and of tripling high-speed rail traffic by 2050.
Amendment 526 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 d (new) (81d) The High-Speed Rail passenger volumes nearly doubled between 2001 and 201832e proving that there is a demand for High-Speed Rail whenever it is provided. __________________ 32e Statistical pocketbook 2021 (europa.eu)
Amendment 527 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 e (new) Amendment 528 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 g (new) (81g) High-Speed Rail is a public transport mode providing access to opportunities especially for women and minorities profile as a social equaliser.
Amendment 529 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 i (new) (81i) High-Speed Rail has a positive economic impact in terms of, inter alia, accessibility, travel timesaving, employment opportunities and tourism boosting32i. __________________ 32i Pagliara, Francesca & Hayashi, Yoshitsugu & Ram, Kallidaikurichi. (2022). High-Speed Rail, Equity and Inclusion. Sustainability. 14. 6710. 10.3390/su14116710.
Amendment 530 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 h (new) (81h) The EU is about creating peace in Europe, and a joint tangible project that aims to connect the people of Europe contributes to this goal.
Amendment 531 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 j (new) (81j) In order to achieve the high-speed rail traffic targets of the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, it is necessary to prioritize the development of a seamless EU High Speed Rail Network for rail passengers (HSR) within the TEN-T policy. In particular, missing links in the current high-speed rail network need to be completed as links with a maximum speed ≥ 250 km/h, concentrating in a first phase on linking all EU capitals by high- speed rail soonest possible by 2040.
Amendment 532 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 81 k (new) (81k) The construction of such high- speed rail missing links between Member States should be a priority for Member States’ investments. With a view to ensuring their coherent development, the HSR should be fully integrated into the TEN-T core network and extended core network as well as into the alignment of the European Transport Corridors.
Amendment 533 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. This Regulation identifies projects of common interest and specifies the requirements to be complied with for the development and implementation of the infrastructure of the trans-European transport network.
Amendment 534 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 1 – paragraph 3 b (new) 3b. This Regulation provides for measures for the implementation of the trans-European transport network. The implementation of projects of common interest depends on their degree of maturity, the compliance with Union and national legal procedures, and the availability of financial resources, without prejudging the financial commitment of a Member State or of the Union.
Amendment 535 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 2. The infrastructure of the trans- European transport network consists of the infrastructure for railway transport, inland waterway transport, maritime transport, road transport,
Amendment 536 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 2 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Infrastructure which has been excluded from the scope of Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council (by Art. 1 of that Directive) and from the scope of Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council (by Art. 2 of that Directive) is not part of the trans-European transport network. Member States may ask for the explicit inclusion of such infrastructure into the trans-European transport network.
Amendment 537 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) ‘upgrade’ means activities that have to be taken in order for the infrastructure to meet the customers’ needs;
Amendment 538 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) 'neighbouring country' means a country falling within the scope of the European Neighbourhood Policy, the Enlargement Policy, and the European Economic Area, the European Free Trade Association or the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, in the geographical, cultural and historical area of outermost regions;
Amendment 539 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) 'cross-border section' means the section which ensures the continuity of a project of common interest on both sides of the border, between the closest urban nodes to the border of two Member States or between a Member State and a neighbouring country, or within multimodal nodes enabling cross-border transport;
Amendment 540 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) 'cross-border section' means the section which ensures the continuity of a
Amendment 541 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) 'cross-border section' means the section which ensures the continuity of a project of common interest on both sides of the border, between the closest urban nodes to the border of two Member States or between a Member State and a neighbouring country, or refers to infrastructure in maritime ports, which enables cross-border maritime transport flows;
Amendment 542 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) 'cross-border section' means the section which ensures the continuity of a project of common interest on both sides of the border, between the closest urban nodes to the border of two Member States or between a Member State and a neighbouring country or refers to infrastructure in maritime ports, which enables cross-border maritime transport flows;
Amendment 543 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) 'cross-border section' means the section which ensures the continuity of a project of common interest on both sides of the border, between the closest urban nodes to the border of two Member States or between a Member State and a neighbouring country or refers to infrastructure in maritime ports, which enables cross-border maritime transport flows;
Amendment 544 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) 'cross-border section' means the section which ensures the continuity of a project of common interest on both sides of the territorial or maritime border, between the closest urban nodes to the border of two Member States or between a Member State and a neighbouring country;
Amendment 545 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) 'bottleneck' means a physical, technical, functional, operational or administrative barrier which leads to a system break
Amendment 546 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'urban node' means a
Amendment 547 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'urban node' means a
Amendment 548 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'urban node' means a
Amendment 549 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'urban node' means a
Amendment 550 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'urban node' means a
Amendment 551 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'urban node' means a
Amendment 552 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'urban node' means a
Amendment 553 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'urban node' means a
Amendment 554 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'urban node' means an urban area where elements of the transport
Amendment 555 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'urban node' means an urban area where elements of the transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network, such as ports including passenger terminals, airports, railway stations, bus terminals, logistic platforms and facilities train turnaround terminals and freight terminals, located in and around the urban area, are connected with other elements of that infrastructure and with the infrastructure for regional and local traffic;
Amendment 556 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) 'urban node' means an urban area where elements of the transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network, such as ports including passenger terminals, airports, railway stations, bus terminals, and infrastructure for active modes, logistic platforms and facilities and freight terminals, located in and around the urban area, are connected with other elements of that infrastructure and with the infrastructure for regional and local traffic;
Amendment 557 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) ‘capacity barrier’ means an area where a saturated single-track rail leads to long delays and travel times affecting the competitiveness and continuity of long-distance or cross-border railway infrastructure, which can be surmounted by creating new infrastructure or substantially upgrading existing infrastructure with double-track line, that could bring significant improvements and create sufficient capacity to solve the bottleneck constraints.
Amendment 558 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) 'isolated network' means the rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge different from that of the European standard nominal track gauge (1435 mm)
Amendment 559 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) 'isolated network' means the rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge different from that of the European standard nominal track gauge (1435 mm)
Amendment 560 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) 'isolated network' means the rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge different from that of the European standard nominal track gauge (1435 mm)
Amendment 561 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) 'isolated network' means the rail network of a Member State, or a part thereof, with a track gauge different from that of the European standard nominal track gauge (1435 mm), for which certain major infrastructure investments cannot be justified in economic cost-benefit terms by virtue of the specificities of that network arising from its geographic detachment or peripheral location, and which doesn't interfere with the interoperability and implementation of the corridor;
Amendment 562 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) "high speed rail" means lines equipped for speeds equal to or greater than 250 km/h.
Amendment 563 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point k (k) 'interoperability' means the ability, including all the regulatory, technical and operational conditions, of the European infrastructure, including digital infrastructure in a transport mode or
Amendment 564 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point k (k) 'interoperability' means the ability, including all the regulatory, technical and operational conditions, of the infrastructure, including digital infrastructure in a transport mode or segment, as well as between different modes, to allow safe and uninterrupted traffic and information flows which achieve the required levels of performance for that infrastructure mode or segment;
Amendment 565 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point l (l) ‘multimodal passenger hub’ means a connection point between at least two transport modes for passengers, where travel information, access to public transport and transfers between modes, including Park and Ride stations and active modes, are ensured and which act as an interface between and within urban nodes and longer-
Amendment 566 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point l (l) ‘multimodal passenger hub’ means a connection point between at least two transport modes for passengers, where travel information, access to public transport and transfers between modes, including Park and Ride stations and active modes, are ensured and which act as an interface within and between urban nodes and longer-
Amendment 567 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m (m) 'multimodal freight
Amendment 568 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m (m) 'multimodal freight
Amendment 569 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m (m) 'multimodal freight
Amendment 570 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m (m) 'multimodal freight terminal' means a structure equipped for transhipment between at least two transport modes or between two different rail systems, including transport infrastructure components, and for temporary storage of freight, such as terminals in inland or maritime ports, along inland waterways, in airports as well as rail road terminals, including multimodal logistics platforms as referred to in Regulation (EU) 2021/1153;
Amendment 571 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m a (new) (ma) ‘port rail access routes’ means those parts of the public rail network directly connected to a rail handover point;
Amendment 572 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m a (new) (ma) ‘port rail access routes’ means those parts of the public rail network directly connected to a rail handover point;
Amendment 573 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m b (new) (mb) ‘rail handover point’ means the designated point(s) where trains are being transferred between the public rail network and the port rail network, which is typically, but not exclusively, a marshalling yard or a multimodal terminal and can be located inside or outside the port area. The rail handover points are defined jointly by the port managing body and the national rail infrastructure manager;
Amendment 574 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m b (new) (mb) ‘rail handover point’ means the designated point(s)where trains are being transferred between the public rail network and the port rail network, which is typically, but not exclusively, a marshalling yard or a multimodal terminal and can be located inside or outside the port area. The rail handover points are defined jointly by the port managing body and the national rail infrastructure manager;
Amendment 575 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m c (new) (mc) ‘port rail network’ means the specific rail infrastructure inside the port area, or outside the port area and under the management of the port managing body, which is used for the purpose of rail freight operations;
Amendment 576 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point m c (new) (mc) ‘port rail network’ means the specific rail infrastructure inside the port area, or outside the port area and under the management of the port managing body, which is used for the purpose of rail freight operations;
Amendment 577 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point n a (new) (na) ‘hyperloop’ is a mode of land transportation capable of high speed and driverless operations, in which a vehicle is guided through a low-pressure tube or system of tubes, for passengers and/or cargo.
Amendment 578 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point p (p) ‘active modes’ means the transport of people or goods, through non-motorised means, based on human physical activity or by a combination of an electric motor and human power;
Amendment 579 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point p (p) ‘active modes’ means the transport of people or goods, through non-motorised means, based on human physical activity, including modes with electric auxiliary propulsion as referred to in Article 2(2) (h) of Regulation (EU) No168/2013;
Amendment 580 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point p a (new) (pa) ‘electric micromobility’ means the transport of people or goods, through the use of a small, lightweight electric vehicle operating at a speed typically below 25 kilometres an hour, and driven by the individual user, such as e-bikes and electric scooters;
Amendment 581 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point q (q) ’ICT systems for transport' means information and communications technology systems and applications using information, communication, navigation or positioning/localisation technologies, including space based technologies, enabling to process, store and exchange the data and information needed to manage infrastructure, mobility and traffic on the trans-European transport network effectively, to report relevant information to authorities and to provide value-added services to citizens, shippers and operators, including systems for resilient, safe, secure, environmentally sound and capacity-efficient use of the network. They include systems, technologies and services referred to in points (r) to (x) and may also include on-board devices with corresponding infrastructure components;
Amendment 582 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point v (v) ‘Air Traffic Management
Amendment 583 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point v a (new) (va) ‘Rail Traffic Management (RTM)' means the aggregation of the on-board, ground-based and space-based services required to ensure the safe and efficient movement of a train during all phases of operations;
Amendment 584 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point v b (new) (vb) 'Rail Network Manager' means the entity entrusted with the tasks necessary to contribute to the management of the rail traffic on EU territory;
Amendment 585 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point v c (new) (vc) 'Inland Waterway Management (IWM)' means the aggregation of the on- board, ground-based and space-based services required to ensure the safe and efficient movement of vessels during all phases of operations;
Amendment 586 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point v d (new) (vd) 'Inland Waterway Network Manager' means the entity entrusted with the tasks necessary to contribute to the management of the inland waterway traffic on EU territory;
Amendment 587 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point w (w) 'European Rail Traffic Management System' (ERTMS) means the system defined in the Annex, point 2.2, to the Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/91938 or ERTMS with resilient technologies, adapted to the needs of the infrastructure and its management, including satellite- and inertial-based ERTMS ; __________________ 38 Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/919
Amendment 588 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point w (w) 'European Rail Traffic Management System' (ERTMS) means the system defined in the Annex, point 2.2, to the Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/91938 ; In addition, whenever ERTMS is mentioned in the context of implementation deadlines, then ERTMS refers to the two existing ERTMS parts ETCS and GSM-R/GPRS/FRMCS. __________________ 38 Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/919
Amendment 589 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point w (w) 'European Rail Traffic Management System' (ERTMS) means the system defined in the Annex, point 2.2, to the Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/91938 ; In addition, whenever ERTMS is mentioned in the context of implementation deadlines, then ERTMS refers to the two existing ERTMS parts ETCS and GSM-R/GPRS/FRMCS. __________________ 38 Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/919
Amendment 590 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point w (w) 'European Rail Traffic Management
Amendment 591 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point w (w) 'European Rail Traffic Management System' (ERTMS) means the system defined in the Annex, point 2.2, to the Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/91938
Amendment 592 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point w (w) 'European Rail Traffic Management System' (ERTMS) means the system defined in the Annex, point 2.2, to the Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/91938 ; Whenever ERTMS is mentioned in the context of implementation deadlines, then ERTMS refers to the two existing ERTMS parts ETCS and GSM-R/FRMCS. __________________ 38 Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/919
Amendment 593 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point w (w) 'European Rail Traffic Management System' (ERTMS) means the system defined in the Annex, point 2.2, to the Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/91938
Amendment 594 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point x (x) 'radio-based ERTMS’ means
Amendment 595 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point x (x) 'radio-based ERTMS’ means
Amendment 596 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point x (x) 'radio-based ERTMS’ means
Amendment 597 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point x (x) 'radio-based ERTMS’ means
Amendment 598 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point x (x) 'radio-based ERTMS’ means
Amendment 599 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point x (x) 'radio-based ERTMS’ means ERTMS of level 2 or level 3 that uses ground-based or space-based radio to pass movement authorities to the train pursuant to Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/91939 ; __________________ 39 Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/919
Amendment 600 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point x a (new) (xa) Rail passenger transport is the type of rail transport whose principal purpose of the service is to carry passengers between stations, and if it is international, between stations located in different Member States and/or third countries; the train may be joined and/or split, and the different sections may have different origins and destinations. For rail passenger transport to be international, all or part of the coaches have to cross at least one border;.
Amendment 601 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point x b (new) (xb) Rail freight transport is the type of rail transport whose principal purpose of the service is to transport cargo. International rail freight transport crosses at least one border of a Member State; this train may be joined and/or split and the different sections may have different origins and destinations, provided that the whole train or part of the train crosses at least one border;
Amendment 602 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point y a (new) Amendment 603 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z (z) ‘maritime port’ means an area of land and water made up of such infrastructure and equipment so as to permit, principally, the reception of
Amendment 604 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z (z) ‘maritime port’ means an area of
Amendment 605 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z (z) ‘maritime port’ means an area of land and water made up of such infrastructure and equipment so as to permit, principally, the reception of
Amendment 606 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z (z) ‘maritime port’ means an area of land and water made up of such infrastructure and equipment so as to permit, principally, the reception of waterborne vessels, their loading and unloading, the storage of goods, the receipt and delivery of those goods and the embarkation and disembarkation of passengers, crew and other persons and any other infrastructure necessary for transport operators within the port area, and which serves as a gateway for trade, industrial clusters and energy hubs;
Amendment 607 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z (z) ‘maritime port’ means an area of land and water made up of such infrastructure and equipment so as to permit, principally, the reception of waterborne vessels, their loading and unloading, the storage of goods, the receipt and delivery of those goods and the embarkation and disembarkation of passengers, crew and other persons and any other infrastructure necessary for transport operators within the port area and which serves as a gateway for trade, industrial clusters and energy hubs;
Amendment 608 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z a (new) (za) ‘managing body of the port’ means any public or private body which, under national law or instruments, has the objective of carrying out, or is empowered to carry out, at a local level, whether in conjunction with other activities or not, the administration and management, building, management and maintenance of the port infrastructure and one or more of the following tasks in the port concerned: the coordination of port traffic, the management of port traffic, the coordination of the activities of the operators present in the port concerned, and the control of the activities of the operators present in the port concerned;
Amendment 609 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z b (new) (zb) ‘port infrastructure’ means infrastructure and facilities for the provision of transport related port services, for example berths used for the mooring of ships, quay walls, jetties and floating pontoon ramps in tidal areas, internal basins, backfills and land reclamation, alternative fuel infrastructure and infrastructure for the collection of ship-generated waste and cargo residues;
Amendment 610 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z c (new) (zc) ‘port superstructure’ means surface arrangements (such as for storage), fixed equipment (such as warehouses and terminal buildings) as well as mobile equipment (such as cranes) located in a port for the provision of transport related port services;
Amendment 611 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a a (aa) ‘short-sea shipping’ means the movement of cargo and passengers by sea between ports situated in geographical waters of one or several Member States or between a port situated in waters of Member States and a port situated in waters of a neighbouring third country having a coastline on the
Amendment 612 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a a (aa) ‘short-sea shipping’ means the movement of cargo and passengers by sea between ports situated in geographical waters of Member States or between a port situated in waters of Member States and a port situated in waters of a neighbouring third country having a coastline on the
Amendment 613 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a a (aa) ‘short-sea shipping’ means the movement of cargo and passengers by sea between ports situated in geographical waters of Member States or between a port situated in waters of Member States and a port situated in waters of a neighbouring third country having a coastline on the enclosed seas bordering waters of the Union, or in direct proximity to the EU's outermost regions;
Amendment 614 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a a (aa) ‘short-sea shipping’ means the movement of cargo and passengers by sea between ports situated in geographical waters of Member States or between a port situated in waters of Member States and a
Amendment 615 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a j (aj) ‘maintenance’ means
Amendment 616 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a j (aj) ‘maintenance’ means activities and works that have to be undertaken routinely, periodically or in emergency situations
Amendment 617 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a k (ak) 'soci
Amendment 618 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a k (ak) 'socio-economic cost-benefit analysis' means a quantified ex-ante evaluation, based on a recognised methodology, of the value of a project, taking into account all the relevant social, economic, climate-related
Amendment 619 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point a k (ak) 'socio-economic cost-benefit analysis' means a quantified ex-ante evaluation, based on a recognised methodology, of the value of a project, taking into account all the relevant social,
Amendment 620 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point an a (new) (an a) ‘project authorising decision’ means the decision or a set of decisions, which may be of an administrative nature, taken simultaneously or successively by an authority or by authorities of a Member State, not including administrative and judicial appeal authorities, under a national legal system and administrative law that determine whether or not a project promoter is entitled to implement the project on the geographical area concerned on the trans-European transport network, without prejudice to any decision taken in the context of an administrative or judicial appeal procedure in accordance with Directive (EU) 2021/1187 of the European Parliament and the Council (the "Smart TEN-T Directive").
Amendment 621 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point an a (new) (an a) ´significant delay´ means projects, operational and technical standards on the core extensive and comprehensive network, which are delayed for, more than 3 years in relation to the implementing deadlines laid down in the Regulation, and in implementing acts provided for therein.
Amendment 622 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point an a (new) (an a) ‘EuroVelo’ means the European network of long-distance cycle routes across Europe that aim to increase European cycle connectivity, standardisation and safety, currently comprised by 17 EuroVelo routes.
Amendment 623 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point an a (new) (an a) ‘light rail’ means a metro/light rail in a cross-border bottleneck section between two urban nodes;
Amendment 624 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point an b (new) (an b) ‘rail connectivity index’ means an index which indicates the level of integration achieved through the use of services on the rail network and showing the potential of rail to compete with other modes of transport, as established in the European Year of Rail Decision (EU) 2020/2228;
Amendment 625 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 1 1. The overall objective of the development of the trans-European network is to establish one multimodal Union wide network of high quality standards
Amendment 626 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The trans-European transport network shall strengthen the social, economic and territorial cohesion of the Union and contribute to the creation of a single European transport area which is sustainable, efficient and resilient and which increases the benefits for its users and supports inclusive sustainable growth. It shall demonstrate European added value by contributing to the objectives laid down in the following four categories:
Amendment 627 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) promotion of zero-emission mobility in line with the relevant Union
Amendment 628 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) enabling greater use of
Amendment 629 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) enabling greater use of more sustainable modes of transport, including by further developing
Amendment 630 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) enabling greater use of more sustainable modes of transport, in
Amendment 631 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) enabling greater use of, and a modal shift towards, more sustainable modes of transport,
Amendment 632 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) enabling greater use of more sustainable modes of transport, including by but not limited to further developing a long-distance rail passenger network at high speed and a fully interoperable rail freight network, a reliable inland waterway, lakes, and short-sea shipping for passengers and freight network across the Union;
Amendment 633 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) enabling greater use of more sustainable modes of transport,
Amendment 634 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) enabling greater use of more sustainable modes of transport, including by further developing a long-distance rail passenger network at high speed and a fully interoperable rail freight network, a reliable inland waterway and short-sea shipping network for passengers and freight across the Union;
Amendment 635 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) enabling greater use of more sustainable modes of transport, including by further developing a long-distance rail passenger network at high speed and a fully interoperable rail freight network, a reliable inland waterway and short-sea shipping for passengers and freight network across the Union;
Amendment 636 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) enabling greater use of more
Amendment 637 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) enabling greater use of more sustainable modes of transport, including by but not limited to further developing a long-distance rail passenger network at high speed and a fully interoperable rail freight network, a reliable inland waterway and short-sea shipping network across the Union;
Amendment 638 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) enabling greater use of more sustainable modes of transport, including by further developing a long-distance rail
Amendment 639 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii a (new) (iia) an optimal integration and financing of the regional and urban railway services;
Amendment 640 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii (iii) increased environmental protection, on the basis of the “do no significant harm” principle;
Amendment 641 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii a (new) (iiia) good working and rest conditions and the safety of the employees;
Amendment 642 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iii a (new) (iiia) contribution to air quality standards and reduction of noise pollution, in full consistency with the EU zero pollution action plan;
Amendment 643 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iv (iv) reduction of negative external
Amendment 644 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point iv (iv) reduction of external costs including those related to environment, climate, health, congestion and accidents;
Amendment 645 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point v (v) greater energy security and efficiency, and the promotion of renewable energy sources;
Amendment 646 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point v a (new) (va) contribution to the deployment of decarbonisation technologies and optimization of synergies with the TEN-E Regulation.
Amendment 647 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point v a (new) (va) promotion of active modes of mobility considering the environment and health benefits of this type of mobility;
Amendment 648 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point v a (new) (va) increasing the overall rail connectivity index;
Amendment 649 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) accessibility and connectivity of all regions of the Union,
Amendment 650 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) accessibility and connectivity of all regions of the Union, including outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions, rural cross-border areas, as well as sparsely populated areas;
Amendment 651 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) accessibility and connectivity of all regions of the Union, including outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas, paying a special attention to fostering connectivity within these regions;
Amendment 652 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) accessibility and connectivity of all regions of the Union, including outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas paying a special attention to fostering connectivity within these regions;
Amendment 653 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i a (new) (ia) European digital systems for management of all transport modes networks;
Amendment 654 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iv a (new) (iva) increase of the modal share of public transport and of active modes;
Amendment 655 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iv a (new) (iva) increasing the overall rail connectivity index;
Amendment 656 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iv a (new) (iva) accessibility of the cities where the European institutions have their headquarters and the optimal interconnection between them;
Amendment 657 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point iv b (new) (ivb) improving interconnections between existing infrastructure through additional arrangements to optimise the operation of the European corridors;
Amendment 658 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (i) the removal of infrastructure bottlenecks and the bridging of missing links, both within the transport infrastructures and at connecting points between these, within Member States' territories
Amendment 659 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point i (i) the removal of infrastructure bottlenecks and the bridging of missing links, both within the transport infrastructures and at connecting points and nodes between these, within Member States' territories and particularly between them;
Amendment 660 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii a (new) (iia) eliminating bottle-necks in the construction of cross-border links;
Amendment 661 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii a (new) (iia) optimisation of the capacity of the rail network;
Amendment 662 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point ii a (new) (iia) ensuring the workers and staff skills necessary for construction, maintenance and operation of infrastructure;
Amendment 663 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iii (iii) the interoperability of European, national, regional and local transport networks through common European technical and operational rules and standards, technical equipment requirements, staff certification including single language. ;
Amendment 664 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point iv (iv) optimal integration and interconnection of all transport modes, including public transport, active mobility and electric micromobility in urban nodes;
Amendment 665 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point v (v) the promotion of economically efficient, high-quality zero-emission transport contributing to
Amendment 666 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point vi (vi) more efficient use of
Amendment 667 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point vi a (new) (via) a binding infrastructure maintenance schedule;
Amendment 668 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point vii (vii) cost-efficient application of innovative technological and operational concept
Amendment 669 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point vii a (new) (viia) the adaptation of regulatory standards to territorial realities of outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions or in sparsely populated areas, or for isolated or partially isolated networks;
Amendment 670 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point vii a (new) (viia) The adaptation of regulatory standards to territorial realities;
Amendment 671 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point vii a (new) (viia) the adaptation of regulatory standards to territorial realities;
Amendment 672 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point vii a (new) (viia) continuous and efficient maintenance programs;
Amendment 673 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point vii a (new) (viia) greater coordination on infrastructure works between Member States.
Amendment 674 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point i (i) ensuring the adapted accessibility for and meeting the mobility and transport needs of
Amendment 675 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point i (i) ensuring the accessibility for and meeting the mobility and transport needs of users, taking into account in particular the needs of people in situations of vulnerability, including persons with disabilities or reduced mobility and people living in remote regions, including the outermost regions and islands, and in rural and sparsely populated areas;
Amendment 676 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point i (i) ensuring the accessibility for and meeting the mobility and transport needs of users, taking into account in particular the needs of people in situations of vulnerability, including persons with disabilities or reduced mobility and people living in remote regions, including the
Amendment 677 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point i a (new) (ia) ensuring common European digital systems for passengers information and ticketing and freight transport coordination;
Amendment 678 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point v (v) ensuring the resilience of infrastructure, in particular on cross-border sections, including maritime cross-border nodes;
Amendment 679 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point v (v) ensuring the resilience of infrastructure, in particular on cross-border sections, including maritime cross-border nodes;
Amendment 680 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point v (v) ensuring the resilience of infrastructure, in particular on cross-border sections, including maritime cross-border nodes;
Amendment 681 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point v (v) ensuring the resilience of infrastructure, in particular on cross-border sections and critical infrastructure;
Amendment 682 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point v a (new) (va) ensuring, when relevant, the adaptation of parts of the TEN-T for the dual use of the infrastructure to address both civilian and defence needs, paying particular attention to strategic infrastructure of the Union.
Amendment 683 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point v a (new) (va) ensuring the adaptation of infrastructure for dual-use on key routes of geostrategic importance;
Amendment 684 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point vi (vi) offering alternative transport solutions and capacity, including on other modes, in case of network disturbances.
Amendment 685 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point vi a (new) (via) supporting active modes of mobility by enhancing accessibility and quality of related infrastructure, by enhancing safety for active users of infrastructure and by ensuring consideration of the health and environmental benefits of active modes of mobility in policy decisions;
Amendment 686 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point vi a (new) (via) ensuring provision of data necessary for digital management of networks.
Amendment 687 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point vi a (new) (via) ensuring adequate maintenance that ensures the quality of the transport infrastructure, and maximises the life cycle value for public money invested in infrastructure;
Amendment 688 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Resource-efficient network, resilience and environmental protection
Amendment 689 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Resource-efficient network, resilience and environmental protection
Amendment 690 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – title Resource-efficient, resilient network and environmental protection
Amendment 691 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) the development and application of common European rules for implementation of common projects especially in cross border sections;
Amendment 692 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) analysis of the social, economic and environmental impact of the infrastructure throughout its life cycle, including the construction phase;
Amendment 693 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the optimisation of European infrastructure integration and interconnection;
Amendment 694 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the deployment of alternative fuels recharging and refuelling infrastructure
Amendment 695 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the deployment of alternative fuels recharging and refuelling infrastructure, including for zero-emission bus and coach fleets at urban nodes and with the location thereof decided in cooperation with relevant local transport authorities;
Amendment 696 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) the development of new infrastructure for the deployment of green vectors following the new scientific findings on the decarbonisation potential of alternative fuels, taking into account their life cycle analysis.
Amendment 697 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) the optimisation of infrastructure use, in particular through efficient capacity and traffic management and the shift towards more sustainable mobility patterns, including the development of sustainable, attractive and efficient multimodal transport services;
Amendment 698 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) the taking into account of possible
Amendment 699 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) the taking into account of possible synergies with other networks, in particular the trans-European energy
Amendment 700 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) the taking into account of possible
Amendment 701 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) the taking into account of possible synergies with other networks, in particular the trans-European energy or telecommunication networks, the EuroVelo network, and local and regional public transport networks;
Amendment 702 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) the taking into account of possible synergies with other networks, in particular the trans-European energy or telecommunication networks, or EuroVelo, the European cycle route network;
Amendment 703 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) the development of green, sustainable and climate resilient infrastructure, including in particular infrastructure dedicated to active modes, designed to minimise the negative impact on the health of citizens living around the network, the environment and degradation of ecosystems;
Amendment 704 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) the development of green, sustainable and climate resilient infrastructure designed to minimise the negative impact on the health of citizens living around the network, the
Amendment 705 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) the adequate consideration of the resilience of the transport network and its strategic infrastructure with regard to a changing climate as well as natural hazards and human-made disasters, as well as intentional disruptions with a view to addressing those challenges; Particular consideration should be given to critical infrastructure, in order to ensure supply in times of disruptions;
Amendment 706 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) the adequate consideration of the resilience of the transport network and its strategic infrastructure with regard to a changing climate as well as natural hazards and human-made disasters, as well as intentional disruptions with a view to addressing those challenges. Particular consideration should be given to critical infrastructure, in order to ensure supply in times of disruptions;
Amendment 707 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) the adequate consideration of the resilience of the transport network and its infrastructure, particularly strategic infrastructure, with regard to a changing climate as well as natural hazards, geopolitical changes and human-made disasters, as well as intentional disruptions with a view to addressing those challenges;
Amendment 708 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) the adequate consideration of the resilience of the transport network and its infrastructure with regard to a changing climate as well as natural hazards and human-made disasters, as well as intentional disruptions, including by natural persons or undertakings from third countries, with a view to addressing those challenges;
Amendment 709 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) the adequate consideration of the resilience of the transport network and its infrastructure with regard to a changing climate as well as natural hazards and human-made disasters, as well as intentional disruptions with a view to addressing those challenges. Particular consideration should be given to critical infrastructure, in order to ensure supply in times of disruptions;
Amendment 710 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) the resilience of infrastructure, especially at cross-border sections, including European Transport Corridors, assuring to respond and recover rapidly from traffic disruptions.
Amendment 711 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) the resilience of infrastructure, especially at cross-border sections, including maritime cross-border nodes, assuring to respond and recover rapidly from traffic disruptions.
Amendment 712 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) the resilience of infrastructure, especially at cross-border sections including maritime cross-border nodes, assuring to respond and recover rapidly from traffic disruptions.
Amendment 713 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (ia) ensuring that maintenance works that result in a limitation or non- availability of rail infrastructure are managed according to the rules stated in Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/2075.
Amendment 714 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. The environmental assessment of plans and projects shall be carried out in accordance with Council Directive 92/43/EEC49 , Directives 2000/60/EC50 , 2001/42/EC51 , 2002/49/EC52 , 2009/147/EC53 and 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council54 .
Amendment 715 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. The environmental assessment of plans and projects shall be carried out in accordance with Council Directive 92/43/EEC49 , Directives 2000/60/EC50 , 2001/42/EC51,
Amendment 716 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. The environmental assessment of plans and projects shall be carried out in accordance with Council Directive 92/43/EEC49 , Directives 2000/60/EC50 , 2001/42/EC51 , 2002/49/EC52 , 2003/4/EC1a, 2009/147/EC53 and 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council54 . For the projects of common interest for which the environmental assessment has not yet been carried out at the date of entry into force of this Regulation, it should also include
Amendment 717 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. The environmental assessment of plans and projects shall be carried out in accordance with Council Directive 92/43/EEC49 , Directives 2000/60/EC50 , 2001/42/EC51 , 2002/49/EC52 , 2009/147/EC53 and 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council54 . For the projects of common interest for which the environmental assessment has not yet been carried out at the date of entry
Amendment 718 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The comprehensive network shall consist of all existing and planned transport infrastructures of the trans-European transport network as well as measures promoting the efficient and socially and environmentally sustainable use of such infrastructure, outlined in Article 5, paragraph 1.
Amendment 719 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 The European Transport Corridors shall consist of the parts of the trans-European transport network which are of the highest strategic importance for the development of sustainable and multimodal freight and passenger transport flows in Europe, with rail as its backbone, and for the development of interoperable high quality infrastructure and operational performance.
Amendment 720 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 The European Transport Corridors shall consist of the parts of the trans-European transport network which are of the highest strategic importance for the development of sustainable and multimodal freight and passenger transport flows in Europe and for the development of interoperable high quality infrastructure and operational performance. The Commission and the Member States shall ensure that all the outermost regions and island regions at NUTS 2 level are included in their corresponding corridors.
Amendment 721 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 7 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 722 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) contribute to the objectives falling within Article 4 (a), as well as contribute to the objectives falling within at least
Amendment 723 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) contribute to the objectives falling within at least t
Amendment 724 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) contribute to the objectives falling within at least two of the four categories set out in Article 4 or in case of an outermost region if fall under Article 4(b);
Amendment 725 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 726 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) be
Amendment 727 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) be economically viable on the basis of a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis, as well as different geographical conditions need to be fully recognised;
Amendment 728 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) be economically viable on the basis of a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis in line with ESG criteria;
Amendment 729 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c (c)
Amendment 730 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) demonstrate European added value that can be measured and replicated.
Amendment 731 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new) (ca) be implemented through common European rules and procedures;
Amendment 732 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission shall establish, through an implementing act and no later than six months after the entry into force of this regulation, a common methodology for a social and environmental cost- benefit analysis of projects, in terms of expected traffic forecasts (in passenger- kilometre during a reference period), catchment area and life-cycle net emissions and energy savings calculation, among other aspects, in order to determine their respective European added value, including the 2030 and 2050 horizons. This shall allow proper comparison between different project proposals and determine their prioritisation in order to maximise the aggregated European added value for a certain level of investment.
Amendment 733 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States will take all necessary actions in order that projects shall continue to benefit from the upgrading of the existing infrastructure so as to ensure sufficient capacity and sustainable utilization to meet customers’ needs. Any decision of a Member State aiming at discontinuing investment or at downsizing an existing infrastructure, shall be based on a thorough and extensive socio-economic cost-benefit analysis, justifying that there is no more market demand for that infrastructure.
Amendment 734 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States will take all necessary actions so that projects continue to benefit from the upgrading of the existing infrastructure so as to ensure sufficient capacity and sustainable utilization to meet customers’ needs. Any decision of a Member State aiming at discontinuing investment or at downsizing an existing infrastructure, shall be based on a thorough and extensive socio- economic cost-benefit analysis, justifying that there is no more market demand for that infrastructure.
Amendment 735 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States with outermost regions and/or island regions at NUTS 2 level shall ensure that projects of common interest are carried out in those regions, failing which the Commission may block its financial participation in other projects of common interest carried out in the Member States concerned.
Amendment 736 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission may re
Amendment 737 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission may re
Amendment 738 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission may
Amendment 739 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission may require Member States by means of an implementing act to establish a single entity for the construction and management of cross-border infrastructure projects of common interest with a view to simplifying administrative procedures and ensuring the consistent implementation of existing rules among the countries involved, establishing criteria for harmonisation, effectiveness and replicability. The relevant European Coordinator shall have the status of observer in the management or supervisory board or in both of that single entity.
Amendment 740 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission may require Member States by means of an implementing act to establish a single entity for the construction and management of cross-border infrastructure projects of common interest. The relevant European Coordinator shall have
Amendment 741 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Member States are required to justify to the Commission decisions aimed at discontinuing or downsizing investment in a project of common interest. Such a justification shall be accompanied with a thorough social and environmental cost- benefit analysis and the Commission has 3 months after the justification has been received to issue a recommendation to the Member State not to discontinue investment.
Amendment 742 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The Union may cooperate with neighbouring countries in order to connect the trans-European transport network with their infrastructure networks with a view to enhancing
Amendment 743 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) ensure the connection between the trans-European transport network and the transport networks of the third countries at border crossing points, including maritime cross-border nodes, in order to guarantee seamless traffic flows, border checks, border surveillance and other border control procedures;
Amendment 744 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) ensure the connection between the trans-European transport network and the transport networks of the third countries at border crossing points, including maritime cross-border nodes in order to guarantee seamless traffic flows, border checks, border surveillance and other border control procedures;
Amendment 745 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) facilitate railway transport with third countries;
Amendment 746 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) promote the interoperability between the trans-European transport network and networks of third countries, involving also the use of technological resources and telecommunications;
Amendment 747 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) facilitate rail transport with third countries;
Amendment 748 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) facilitate maritime transport and promote short-sea shipping routes with third countries, including third countries in direct proximity to the EU’s outermost regions;
Amendment 749 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) facilitate maritime transport and promote short-sea shipping routes with third countries including third countries in direct proximity to the EU´s outermost regions;
Amendment 750 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) facilitate inland waterway transport with third countries, including third countries in direct proximity to the EU's outermost regions;
Amendment 751 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) facilitate
Amendment 752 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point g Amendment 753 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h – point i (new) (i) facilitate railway transport with third countries, e.g. Western Balkans, Eastern Partnership (EaP) and EU accession countries;
Amendment 754 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (ha) Facilitate railway transport with third countries, such as Western Balkans, Eastern Partnership, Candidate countries, EEA countries, Switzerland and other third countries.
Amendment 755 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (ha) Facilitate railway transport with third countries, such as Western Balkans, Eastern Partnership, Accession countries, EEA countries, Switzerland and countries in Asia.
Amendment 756 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (ha) promote the decarbonisation of transport, in particular through the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure in third countries in view of establishing a continuous network linked with the trans-European transport network.
Amendment 757 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission and the Member States concerned shall ensure that outermost regions and island regions at NUTS 2 level are duly included in the dimensions of cooperation with third countries that are relevant to these regions.
Amendment 758 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) be as specified in the maps in Annex I and in the lists in Annex II, which should exclusively represent the final goals of the network, i.e. nodes and itineraries, with their implementation deadlines (2030, 2040 or 2050). The TENtec system should reflect the evolution of the network in accordance with Article 55;
Amendment 759 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) be as specified in the maps in Annex I, including the map of the EU High-Speed Rail Network, and in the lists in Annex II;
Amendment 760 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) constitute the essential basis for the
Amendment 761 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) (e) take into account the physical limitations and topographical particularities of Member States' transport infrastructures, as identified in the technical specifications for interoperability (TSIs).
Amendment 762 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) take into account the physical limitations and topographical particularities of Member States' transport infrastructures, as identified in the technical specifications for interoperability (TSIs).
Amendment 763 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. The core network should be expanded to sufficiently cover strategically important maritime ports within the European Union, particularly taking into account the recent geopolitical events. The scope of the expansion of the core network should be determined taking into account the role of maritime ports in the security of supply, and the building and maintenance of renewable energy facilities.
Amendment 764 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall take the appropriate measures for the European Transport Corridors to be developed in order to comply with the provisions of this Regulation, by 31 December 2030 for their infrastructure which is part of the core network, unless specified otherwise, and by 31 December 2040 for their infrastructure which is part of the extended core network, unless specified otherwise. In addition, Member States are urged, as a matter of the utmost urgency, to propose pragmatic and financially sustainable solutions that can be implemented in the short to medium term, in a bid to end the isolation of certain areas by speeding up the modernisation of infrastructure networks, thereby attracting fresh investment and new businesses, while at the same time halting depopulation and the weakening of the economic fabric.
Amendment 765 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 Amendment 766 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 60 of this Regulation to amend the alignment of the European Transport Corridors in Annex III to this Regulation, in order to take into account, in particular, the development of major trade flows and traffic or substantial changes to the
Amendment 767 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 11 – paragraph 3 3. The Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 60 of this Regulation to amend the alignment of the European Transport Corridors in Annex III to this Regulation, in order to take into account, in particular, the development of major trade flows and traffic or substantial changes to the network. At the request of the regions concerned, the Commission shall also be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 60 of this Regulation to amend the maps of the comprehensive network, the extended network and the core network, the list of nodes and the alignment of the European transport corridors set out in Annexes I, II and III to this Regulation, in order to integrate all transport infrastructure in the outermost regions and islands at NUTS 2 level that would not have been integrated.
Amendment 768 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) increasing
Amendment 769 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) increasing the modal share of freight and passenger transport activity of more sustainable modes of transport, particularly rail, in view of a reduction of GHG emissions from transport;
Amendment 770 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) increasing the overall modal share of freight and passenger transport activity of more sustainable modes of transport in view of a reduction of GHG emissions from transport;
Amendment 771 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) ensuring enhanced accessibility and connectivity for all regions of the Union while taking into consideration territorial and social cohesion as well as the specific case of the outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas; to this end, consideration should also be given to the progressive inclusion of the outermost regions in the core network as a means of ensuring effective territorial and social cohesion;
Amendment 772 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) ensuring enhanced accessibility and connectivity for all regions of the Union while taking into consideration territorial and social cohesion
Amendment 773 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) ensuring optimal integration of the transport modes and interoperability between transport modes, prioritising integration and interoperability with the most sustainable modes;
Amendment 774 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) bridging missing links and removing bottlenecks for rail, particularly in cross-
Amendment 775 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) bridging missing links and removing bottlenecks, particularly in cross- border sections, including maritime cross- border nodes ;
Amendment 776 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) bridging missing links and removing bottlenecks, particularly in cross- border sections, including maritime cross- border nodes;
Amendment 777 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) bridging missing links and removing bottlenecks, particularly in cross- border sections, including maritime cross- border nodes;
Amendment 778 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) bridging missing links and removing bottlenecks, including capacity barriers, particularly in cross-
Amendment 779 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) bridging missing links and removing bottlenecks, particularly in cross- border sections and projects;
Amendment 780 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) deploying the necessary infrastructure which ensures a seamless circulation of low-carbon and zero- emission vehicles;
Amendment 781 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) promoting the efficient
Amendment 782 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) promoting the efficient and sustainable use of the infrastructure and, where necessary, increasing capacity
Amendment 783 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) promoting the efficient and sustainable use of the infrastructure and, where necessary, increasing capacity; ensuring that following the integration of ETCs and RFCs, sufficient capacity for rail passenger and freight is reserved on the corridors.
Amendment 784 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) ensuring that sufficient capacity for rail passenger and freight is reserved on the corridors, with a fair share for each, following the integration of Rail Freight Corridors into the European Transport Corridors;
Amendment 785 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) keeping existing infrastructure operational and
Amendment 786 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) keeping existing infrastructure operational and improving or maintaining its quality in terms of safety, security, efficiency of the transport system and transport operations, resilience of strategic infrastructure as well as climate and disaster resilience, environmental performance, and the continuity of traffic flows;
Amendment 787 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) keeping existing infrastructure operational and improving or maintaining its quality in terms of safety, security, efficiency of the transport system and transport operations, resilience of critical infrastructure, as well as climate and disaster resilience, environmental performance, and the continuity of traffic flows;
Amendment 788 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) keeping existing infrastructure operational and improving or maintaining its quality in terms of safety, security, efficiency of the transport system
Amendment 789 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) improving the quality of services and social conditions for transport workers, with special attention to the gender dimension, accessibility for all users, including persons with disabilities or reduced mobility and other people in situations of vulnerability, preventing and mitigating mobility poverty;
Amendment 790 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (ia) ensuring synergies between the trans-European transport network and energy networks, in order to connect local production of clean energy with mobility applications as well as the deployment of other technologies contributing to the decarbonisation of the economy;
Amendment 791 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (ia) ensuring synergies between the trans-European transport network and energy networks, in order to connect local production of clean energy with mobility applications as well as the deployment of other technologies contributing to the decarbonisation of the economy;
Amendment 792 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (ia) adapting, where necessary, the infrastructure to a dual use in order to address both civilian and defence needs, paying particular attention to strategic infrastructure of the Union.
Amendment 793 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (ia) Constructing new infrastructure, notably to increase capacity for more sustainable modes of transport in accordance with this Article, paragraph 1 (a).
Amendment 794 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (ia) Constructing new infrastructure, notably to increase capacity for more sustainable modes of transport.
Amendment 795 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point i b (new) (ib) removing barriers for active modes when infrastructure is being built or upgraded.
Amendment 796 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point i b (new) (ib) the deployment of other technologies contributing to the decarbonisation of the economy, such as carbon dioxide transport through pipelines or other modes of transport;
Amendment 797 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. deploying the necessary infrastructure which ensures a seamless integration of active modes of mobility in the transport network;
Amendment 798 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) contributing to transport emission reduction and increased energy security by promoting the use of zero-emission vehicles and vessels and renewable
Amendment 799 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) contributing to transport emission reduction and increased energy security by promoting the use of zero-emission vehicles and vessels and renewable, alternative and low-carbon fuels, through the deployment of corresponding alternative fuels infrastructure;
Amendment 800 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) mitigating exposure of urban and rural areas to negative effects of transiting rail and
Amendment 801 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) optimising the use of infrastructure, in particular through efficient capacity management, traffic management
Amendment 802 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) significant reduction of border waiting times for road freight transport through the introduction of an EU-wide standard of an average 1-minute for processing and controls of heavy-duty vehicles at EU borders;
Amendment 803 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) accelerating the construction of "projected new construction lines" in cross-border sections with the potential of increasing rail freight traffic.
Amendment 804 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) ensuring the resilience of the network, in particular with regards to strategic infrastructure and military infrastructure.
Amendment 805 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) increasing the resilience of the network, with a focus on strategic infrastructure and dual-use infrastructure.
Amendment 806 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Contributing to positive health and environmental effects by promoting the use of active modes of mobility through the deployment of corresponding infrastructure for cycling and walking.
Amendment 807 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) By ... [date six months after the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall complete a study on connecting all Union Capitals, chosen major cities and metropolitan areas with a railway high speed line network. The study shall be developed in cooperation with the Member States which will consult with stakeholders, and especially railway infrastructure managers. The study shall identify the financial instruments to finance the construction of the network. The conclusions of the study shall become the basis for the Member States to develop a European high speed network.
Amendment 808 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) The Commission shall complete a study on connecting all Union Capitals, chosen major cities and metropolitan areas with a railway high speed line network. The study shall be developed in cooperation with the Member States which will consult with stakeholders, and especially railway infrastructure managers. The study shall identify the financial instruments to finance the construction of the network. The conclusions of the study shall become the basis for the Member States to develop a European high-speed network.
Amendment 809 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the development of a high performance rail passenger network, fully
Amendment 810 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the development of a high performance rail passenger network, fully interoperable and at high speed, connecting urban nodes across the Union
Amendment 811 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the development of a high performance rail passenger network, fully interoperable and at high speed, connecting urban nodes across the Union and especially at a high speed all capitals and major cities, with the exception of networks that are isolated from the rest of the Union rail system;
Amendment 812 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the development of a seamless, sustainable and environmentally friendly inland waterways
Amendment 813 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the development of a seamless inland waterways, aviation and maritime infrastructure system and connections for passengers and freight;
Amendment 814 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the development of a seamless inland waterways, aviation and maritime infrastructure system for passengers and freight;
Amendment 815 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the development of a seamless inland waterways, aviation and maritime infrastructure system for passengers and freight;
Amendment 816 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the development of a seamless inland waterways, aviation and maritime infrastructure system for passengers and freight;
Amendment 817 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d (d)
Amendment 818 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the development of a safe and secure road network, with sufficient alternative fuel infrastructures and safe and secure truck parking areas;
Amendment 819 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) the development of improved
Amendment 820 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) the development of improved multimodal and interoperable transport solutions. including the integration of active modes of mobility in urban nodes;
Amendment 821 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) the intermodal integration of the entire logistic chain, interconnecting efficiently in the transport and urban nodes and facilitating a shift to zero-emission logistic chains, including full decarbonisation of last-mile transport; ;
Amendment 822 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) the deployment of the necessary infrastructure which ensures a seamless circulation of
Amendment 823 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) the deployment of the necessary infrastructure which ensures a seamless circulation of carbon neutral, low and zero-emission vehicles.
Amendment 824 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) better connecting the outermost regions and islands.
Amendment 825 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 a (new) Article 13a High speed connections 1. By ... [date six months after the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall complete a study on connecting all Union Capitals, chosen major cities and metropolitan areas with a railway high speed line network. The study shall be developed in cooperation with the Member States which will consult with stakeholders, and especially railway infrastructure managers. The study shall identify the financial instruments to finance the construction of the network. The conclusions of the study shall become the basis for the Member States to develop a European high speed network. 2. In light of this study and in close cooperation with the relevant stakeholders the Commission shall present a legislative proposal on connecting all Union capitals, chosen major cities and metropolitan areas with a railway high speed line network.
Amendment 826 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 a (new) Article 13a Connecting all Union Capitals By ... [date six months after the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall complete a study on connecting all Union Capitals, chosen major cities and metropolitan areas with a railway high speed line network. The study shall be developed in cooperation with the Member States which will consult with stakeholders, and especially railway infrastructure managers. The study shall identify the financial instruments to finance the construction of the network. The conclusions of the study shall become the basis for the Member States to develop a European high speed network.
source: 738.648
2022/11/17
TRAN
383 amendments...
Amendment 1000 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that, by 31 December 2030, the quality of services provided by infrastructure managers
Amendment 1001 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that, by 31 December 2030, the quality of services provided by infrastructure managers to railway undertakings and terminal operators , technical and operational requirements for infrastructure use and procedures related to border controls
Amendment 1002 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that, by 31 December 2030, the quality of services provided by infrastructure managers to railway undertakings and terminal operators, technical and operational requirements for infrastructure use and procedures related to border controls do not prevent the operational performance of rail freight services along the rail freight lines of the European Transport Corridors from meeting the following target values:
Amendment 1003 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) for each internal Union cross- border section, the dwelling time of all freight trains crossing the border
Amendment 1004 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) for each internal Union cross- border section, the dwelling time of all freight trains crossing the border
Amendment 1005 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) for each internal Union cross- border section, the dwelling time of all freight trains crossing the border does not exceed 15 minutes on average. Dwelling time of a train on a cross-border section means the total additional transit time that can be attributed to the existence of the border crossing, irrespective of the underlying causes, such as police border controls and procedures or considerations
Amendment 1006 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) at least
Amendment 1007 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) in compliance with the requirements of passenger transport, at least 90% of the freight trains crossing at least one border of a European Transport Corridor arrive at their destination, or at the external Union border if their destination is outside the Union, at their scheduled time or with a delay of less
Amendment 1008 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) at least 90% of the passenger trains crossing at least one border of a European Transport Corridor arrive at their destination, or at the external Union border if their destination is outside the Union, at their scheduled time or with a delay of less than 30 minutes.
Amendment 1009 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall modify, as appropriate, contractual agreements referred to in Article 30 of Directive 2012/34/EU and take appropriate measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No
Amendment 1010 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The European Commission, in close cooperation with all the rail stakeholders, shall ensure that a digital capacity management system, which enables passenger and freight operators to book a cross-border train path, will be developed by 31 December 2025. Member States shall fully deploy the system on the rail lines of the European Transport Corridors core and extended core networks by 31 December 2027.
Amendment 1011 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The European Commission, in close cooperation with all the rail stakeholders, shall ensure that a digital capacity management system, which enables passenger and freight operators to book a cross-border train path, will be developed by 31 December 2025. Member States shall fully deploy the system on the European Transport Corridors, core and extended core networks by 31 December 2027.
Amendment 1012 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The European Commission, in close cooperation with all the rail stakeholders, shall ensure that a digital capacity management system, which enables passenger and freight operators to book a cross-border train path, will be developed by31.12.2025. Member States shall fully deploy the system on the European Transport Corridors, core and extended core networks by 31.12.2027.
Amendment 1013 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The European Commission, in close cooperation with all the rail stakeholders, shall ensure that a digital capacity management system, which enables passenger and freight operators to book a cross-border train path, will be developed by 31.12.2025. Member States shall fully deploy the system on the European Transport Corridors core and extended core networks by 31.12.2027.
Amendment 1014 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The European Commission, in close cooperation with all the rail stakeholders, shall ensure that a digital capacity management system, which enables passenger and freight operators to book a cross-border train path, will be developed by31.12.2025. Member States shall fully deploy the system on the European Transport Corridors, core and extended core networks by 31.12.2027.
Amendment 1015 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) mitigating the impact of noise and vibration caused by rail transport, in particular through measures for rolling stock, such as whisper brakes, and for infrastructure, including noise protection barriers;
Amendment 1016 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) mitigating the impact of noise and vibration caused by rail transport, in particular through measures for rolling stock and for infrastructure, including noise protection barriers provided that there is a cost-benefit analysis; noise should be treated at a system level ;
Amendment 1017 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) mitigating the impact of noise and vibration caused by rail transport, in particular through measures for rolling stock and for infrastructure, including noise protection barriers provided that there is a cost-benefit analysis;
Amendment 1018 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) developing the EU High-Speed Rail Network for rail passengers referred to in Annex 1, in particular its high-speed rail missing links, in line with the provisions for the completion of the core network and of the extended core network set out in Article 6(1),
Amendment 1019 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) upgrading bottleneck sections to double-track, improving the corridor's capacity and resilience;
Amendment 1020 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) improving the safety of level crossings, and where feasible converting to railway overpasses or tunnels;
Amendment 1021 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) improving the safety of level crossings, through the use of innovative technologies for example;
Amendment 1022 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) Prioritise upgrading to double- track rail in bottlenecks and capacity barriers, where the competitiveness of railway, compared to less environmentally friendly transport modes, is hindered by insufficient infrastructure capacity;
Amendment 1023 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) upgrading relevant parts of the port rail networks to enable seamless rail freight operations;
Amendment 1024 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) upgrading relevant parts of the port rail networks to enable seamless rail freight operations;
Amendment 1025 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) where appropriate, connecting railway transport infrastructure with inland waterway and port infrastructure;
Amendment 1026 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) connecting airports of the core network with the long-distance rail network, including the high-speed rail network, by 31 December 2030;
Amendment 1027 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new) (cb) connecting airports of the comprehensive network with the long- distance rail net-work, including the high- speed rail net-work, by 31 December 2050;
Amendment 1028 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) As a long term perspective, subject to socio-economic costs and benefits analysis, developing of infrastructure for train length above 740 m and up to 1500 m and 25.0 t axle load when constructing and modernising railway lines relevant for freight traffic
Amendment 1029 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) As a long term perspective, subject to socio-economic costs and benefits analysis, developing of infrastructure for train length above 740 m and up to 1500 m and 25.0 t axle load when constructing and modernising railway lines relevant for freight traffic
Amendment 1030 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) developing and deploying innovative technologies for railways, building in particular on the work of the Shift2Rail and Europe’s Rail Joint Undertakings, notably automatic train operation, advanced traffic management, and digital connectivity for passengers and freight based on ERTMS and digital automatic couplings as well as 5G connectivity; the development of Digital Capacity Management in both hardware and software applications should be supported.
Amendment 1031 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) developing and deploying innovative technologies for railways, building in particular on the work of the Shift2Rail and Europe’s Rail Joint Undertakings, notably automatic train operation, advanced traffic management, and digital connectivity for passengers based on ERTMS and digital automatic couplings as well as 5G connectivity; the development of Digital Capacity Management in both hardware and software applications should be supported.
Amendment 1032 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) developing and deploying innovative technologies for railways, building in particular on the work of the Shift2Rail and Europe’s Rail Joint Undertakings, notably automatic train operation, including automated shunting and automated brake status testing, advanced traffic management, and digital connectivity for passengers based on ERTMS and digital automatic couplings as well as 5G connectivity;
Amendment 1033 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) developing and deploying innovative technologies for railways, building in particular on the work of the Shift2Rail and Europe’s Rail Joint Undertakings, notably automatic train operation, advanced traffic management, and digital connectivity for passengers based on ERTMS and digital automatic couplings as well as 5G connectivity and satellite monitoring;
Amendment 1034 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) Developing and gradually introducing innovative ERTMS- related technologies contributing to efficiency, safety or sustainability into the core, extended core and comprehensive networks.
Amendment 1035 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point e b (new) (eb) supporting the development of Digital Capacity Management in both hardware and software applications;
Amendment 1036 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) when building or upgrading railway infrastructure, consider the added value of developing or upgrading simultaneously parallel infrastructure for active mobility and electric micromobility, and ensure the continuity and accessibility of pedestrian and cycling paths, in order to promote the active modes of transport;
Amendment 1037 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) where appropriate, upgrading to double-track rail to enhance capacity of saturated single-track rail, particularly at cross-border bottlenecks;
Amendment 1038 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g Amendment 1039 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) developing innovative alternative fuels technologies for railways, such as hydrogen and other alternative fuels for sections that are exempted from the electrification requirement, with the adoption of specific solutions in each case.
Amendment 1040 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) developing innovative alternative fuels technologies for railways, such as hydrogen and battery electric applications for sections that are exempted
Amendment 1041 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) developing innovative alternative fuels technologies for railways, such as hydrogen and battery powered trains for sections that are exempted from the electrification requirement.
Amendment 1042 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) developing innovative alternative fuels technologies for railways, such as hydrogen for sections that are exempted from the electrification requirement where the economic viability of such projects has been established on basis of a cost-benefit analysis.
Amendment 1043 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) developing innovative alternative fuels technologies for railways, such as hydrogen, with the condition of an economically viable business case for sections that are exempted from the electrification requirement.
Amendment 1044 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) integrating cycling infrastructure alongside rail lines and within civil engineering structures such as bridges or tunnels.
Amendment 1045 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) gradual introduction of innovative technologies including FRMCS infrastructure at least on the Core and Extended Core Networks.
Amendment 1046 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) gradual introduction of innovative technologies including FRMCS infrastructure at least on the Core and Extended Core Networks.
Amendment 1047 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) gradual introduction of innovative technologies including FRMCS infrastructure at least on the Core and Extended Core Networks.
Amendment 1048 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) developing FRMCS technology in order to deploy an ERTMS based on resilient technologies adapted to the needs of the infrastructure and its management, including satellite- and inertial-based ERTMS.
Amendment 1049 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new) Gradual introduction of innovative technologies including FRMCS infrastructure at least on the Core and Extended Core Networks.
Amendment 1050 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 a (new) By [6 months after the entry into force of this Regulation], the Commission shall establish a list of the high-speed rail missing links in the EU High-Speed Rail Network referred to in Annex 1. That list shall identify the parts of these missing links covered by the core network and by the extended core network. It shall also indicate an investment priority rank for each missing link, taking into account inter alia the population served and construction cost. The rail lines corresponding to these missing links shall be part of the alignment of the European Transport Corridors. Where necessary, the Commission shall amend Annex III, pursuant to Article 11(3).
Amendment 1051 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) lakes, lagoons and sounds;
Amendment 1052 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) mooring and rest
Amendment 1053 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) inland ports, including basic port infrastructure in the form of internal basins, quay walls, berths, jetties, docks, dykes, backfills, platforms, land reclamation and the infrastructure necessary for transport operations within the port area and outside the port area;
Amendment 1054 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) inland ports, including basic port infrastructure in the form of internal basins, quay walls, berths, jetties, docks, dykes, backfills, platforms, land reclamation and the infrastructure necessary for transport operations within the port area and outside the port area;
Amendment 1055 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) associated equipment referred to in paragraph 2;
Amendment 1056 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 1 – point l a (new) (la) infrastructure necessary for facilitating the energy transition, including facilities for the building, conversion and retrofitting of ships.
Amendment 1057 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. Equipment associated with inland
Amendment 1058 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. Equipment associated with inland waterways may include equipment for the loading and unloading of cargos and storage of goods in inland ports. Associated equipment may include, in particular, propulsion and operating systems which reduce pollution, such as water and air pollution, energy consumption and carbon intensity. It may also include waste reception facilities, shore-side electricity power supply and other alternative fuels infrastructure for supply and generation and used oil collection facilities, as well as equipment for ice-breaking, hydrological services and maintenance or remedial dredging of the fairway, port and port approaches to ensure year-round navigability.
Amendment 1059 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 2 2. Equipment associated with inland waterways may include equipment for the loading and unloading of cargos and storage of goods in inland ports. Associated equipment may include, in particular, propulsion and operating systems which reduce pollution, such as water and air pollution, energy consumption and carbon intensity. It may also include waste reception facilities, shore-side electricity power supply and other alternative fuels infrastructure for supply and generation and used oil collection facilities, as well as equipment for ice-breaking, hydrological services and dredging of the fairway, port and port approaches to ensure year-round navigability. It also include equipment and facilities, in so far they are not covered by in corresponding TEN-E Regulation, necessary to ensure the safe and efficient transport of carbon dioxide towards its permanent storage site via rail.
Amendment 1060 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3.
Amendment 1061 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) it has an annual freight transhipment volume exceeding 500,000 tonnes. The total annual freight transhipment volume shall be based on the latest available three-year average, based on the statistics published by Eurostat, or it has an annual volume of passenger traffic volume exceeding 500.000 persons. The reference amount for this total volume is the latest available three-year average;
Amendment 1062 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (ba) it is of strategic importance to the resilience of the Union, including in the areas of the energy transition, energy security, geopolitical position and military mobility.
Amendment 1063 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. (b)The criterion of annual freight transhipment volume can be deviated from, provided that the inland port serves specific demands, such as the fuel supply of industrial plants or other traffic carriers or the loading of high capacity freight cars and deadweight cargo.
Amendment 1064 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 20 a (new) Article 20a High Speed connections Improving strategic transport links by developing high-speed rail connections for a speed of 250km/h or above, connecting all EU capitals and major cities, as specified in the corresponding map in Annex 3[Annex 3 - part 1a (new)]
Amendment 1065 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) will be connected with the
Amendment 1066 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) are equipped with facilities to improve the environmental performance of vessels in ports, including reception facilities, degassing facilities, noise reduction measures, measures to reduce air and water pollution, based on a cost- benefit analysis taking into account the needs of the respective European Transport Corridor to improve the environmental performance of vessels in ports.
Amendment 1067 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) are equipped with facilities to improve the environmental performance of vessels in ports, which may includ
Amendment 1068 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) are equipped with facilities to improve the environmental performance of vessels in ports, including reception facilities, degassing facilities, noise reduction measures, measures to reduce air and water pollution, such as electrification at berth.
Amendment 1069 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that the inland ports of the core network meet the requirements set out in Article 21(1), points (a)
Amendment 1070 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that the inland waterway network, including connections referred to in Article 20(1), point (e), is maintained to enable efficient, reliable and safe navigation for users by ensuring minimum waterway requirements
Amendment 1071 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that the inland waterway network, including connections referred to in Article 20(1), point (e), is maintained to
Amendment 1072 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that the inland waterway network, including connections referred to in Article 20(1), point (e), is maintained to enable efficient, reliable and safe navigation for users by ensuring minimum waterway requirements and levels of service
Amendment 1073 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Member States shall in particular ensure that projects are compatible with environmental standards and the ‘Do No Significant Harm’ principle, and that:
Amendment 1074 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Member States shall in particular, by 31 December 2030, ensure that:
Amendment 1075 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Member States shall by 31 December 2030 in particular ensure that:
Amendment 1076 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a – paragraph 1 Rivers, canals, lakes, inland ports and their access routes provide a navigable channel depth of at least 2.5 m and a minimum height under non-openable bridges of at least 5.25 m at defined reference water levels, which are exceeded at a defined number of days per year on a statistical average. This requirement shall not apply if it is not compatible with environmental standards and the ‘Do No Significant Harm’ principle.
Amendment 1077 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a – paragraph 1 Rivers, canals, lakes, lagoons, inland ports and their access routes provide a navigable channel depth of at least 2.5 m and a minimum height under non-openable bridges of at least 5.25 m at defined reference water levels, which are exceeded at a defined number of days per year on a statistical average.
Amendment 1078 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a – paragraph 2 The reference water levels shall be established on the basis of the number of days per year on which the actual water level exceeded the specified reference water level.
Amendment 1079 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a – paragraph 2 The reference water levels shall be established on the basis of the number of days per year on which the actual water level exceeded the specified reference water level.
Amendment 1080 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a – paragraph 2 The reference water levels shall be established on the basis of the number of days per year on which the actual water level exceeded the specified reference water level. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the reference water levels
Amendment 1081 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a – paragraph 2 The reference water levels shall be established on the basis of the number of days per year on which the actual water level exceeded the specified reference water level. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the reference water levels referred to in the previous subparagraph per
Amendment 1082 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a – paragraph 2 The reference water levels shall be established on the basis of the number of days per year on which the actual water level exceeded the specified reference water level. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the reference water levels referred to in the previous subparagraph per river basin. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 59(3), also with the use of predictive and satellite systems.
Amendment 1083 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a – paragraph 2 a (new) When specifying the reference water levels as well as the number of days per year referred to in paragraph 3 (b), the requirements which are set out in international conventions and in agreements concluded between Member States shall be referred to. Rivers, canals and lakes meeting the minimum specifications of paragraph3(a) are assigned to a European Transport Corridor.
Amendment 1084 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a – paragraph 3 When specifying the reference water levels the Commission shall
Amendment 1085 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a – paragraph 3 When specifying the reference water levels the Commission shall
Amendment 1086 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a – paragraph 3 When specifying the reference water levels the Commission shall take into account the requirements which are set out in international conventions and in agreements concluded between Member States, including in the regulations adopted by the river navigation commissions set up by such conventions and agreements.
Amendment 1087 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a – paragraph 3 a (new) Member States shall ensure that any inland waterway infrastructure, for which the environmental assessment has not yet been carried out at the date of entry into force of this Regulation, does not constitute a barrier to longitudinal and lateral connectivity of free-flowing rivers, so as to support the objective of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 to restore at least 25 000 km of rivers into free-flowing rivers.
Amendment 1088 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new) (aa) rivers and canals meeting the minimum waterway requirements of paragraph 3(a) are assigned to a European Transport Corridor
Amendment 1089 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new) (aa) Member States shall ensure by 31.12.2030 a land-side power supply with electricity for every moored ship. The use of electricity for auxiliary engines shall be compulsory by 31.12.2030.
Amendment 1090 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new) (da) Member States shall ensure that any inland waterway infrastructure, for which the environmental assessment has not yet been carried out at the date of entry into force of this Regulation, does not constitute a barrier to longitudinal and lateral connectivity of free-flowing rivers, so as to support the objective of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 to restore at least 25 000 km of rivers into free-flowing rivers.
Amendment 1091 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions from the minimum requirements referred to in paragraph (3), point (a), may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit
Amendment 1092 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall adopt implementing acts per European Transport Corridor setting out requirements complementing the minimum requirements established in accordance with paragraph (3), point (a), second subparagraph,
Amendment 1093 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part The Commission shall adopt implementing acts setting out requirements in cooperation with, where applicable, the respective river navigation commissions, complementing the minimum requirements established in accordance with paragraph (3), point (a), second subparagraph, per
Amendment 1094 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point e (e) deployment of alternative energy infrastructure to ensure corridor-wide access to sufficient alternative fuels, in particular sufficient access to onshore power enabling full electrification at berth by 2030;
Amendment 1095 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point h (h) introduction and promotion of new
Amendment 1096 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point h (h) introduction and promotion of new technologies and innovation for zero- carbon energy fuels and propulsion systems, as well as technologies that has a lower environmental impact on river, canal and lake ecosystems both when it comes to operation and infrastructure needs.
Amendment 1097 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – point h a (new) (ha) facilities to improve the environmental performance of vessels in ports, inter alia noise reduction measures and measures to reduce air and water pollution;
Amendment 1098 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall ensure a coherent approach on the application of the good navigation status in the Union and may adopt guidelines thereto. When establishing minimum requirements for paragraphs (e) and (f), the Commission shall ensure that the interoperability between
Amendment 1099 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall ensure a coherent approach on the application of the good navigation status in the Union and may adopt guidelines thereto. When establishing minimum requirements for paragraphs (e) and (f), the Commission shall ensure that the interoperability between
Amendment 1100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 22 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission shall ensure a coherent approach on the application of the good navigation status in the Union and may adopt guidelines thereto. When establishing minimum requirements for paragraphs (e) and (f), the Commission shall ensure that the interoperability between river basins is not unduly compromised, whilst also ensuring the ‘Do No Significant Harm’ principle is respected.
Amendment 1101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) where
Amendment 1102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) developing and deploying means to monitor fairway conditions;
Amendment 1103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point c (c)
Amendment 1104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the promotion of sustainable,
Amendment 1105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) modernisation and expansion of the capacity of the infrastructure, including mooring and rest places and their services, necessary for transport and mobility operations within as well as outside the port area and along the waterway;
Amendment 1106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) modernisation and expansion of the capacity of the infrastructure (including sufficient mooring and rest places) necessary for transport operations within as well as outside the port area;
Amendment 1107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) promoting and developing measures to improve the environmental and climate performance of inland waterway transport
Amendment 1108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) promoting and developing measures to improve the environmental performance of inland waterway transport and transport infrastructure, including zero
Amendment 1109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) promoting and developing measures to improve the environmental performance of inland waterway transport
Amendment 1110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) providing active modes infrastructure alongside waterways.
Amendment 1111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 a (new) The Commission shall provide in a maximum two years from the date of entry in force of this Regulation the legislative framework for developing the digital European Inland Waterway Management and for establishing the Inland Waterway Network Manager.
Amendment 1112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 1 1. The European Maritime Space connects and integrates the maritime components described in paragraph 2 with the landside network through the creation or upgrading of short-sea shipping routes between two or more maritime ports on the Union territory or between one or more port(s) on the Union territory and a port on the territory of a neighbouring third country having a coastline on the enclosed seas bordering waters of the Union or in the geographical area of outermost regions, and through the development of maritime ports on the Union territory and their hinterland connections to provide an efficient, viable and sustainable integration with other modes of transport.
Amendment 1113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) wider benefit actions that are not directly linked to specific ports and that benefit the European Maritime Space and the maritime industry widely, such as support to activities ensuring year-round navigability (icebreaking), ICT systems for transport and hydrographic surveys.
Amendment 1114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) wider benefit actions that are not linked to specific ports and that benefit the European Maritime Space and the maritime industry widely, such as support to activities ensuring year-round navigability (icebreaking), facilitating the transition towards sustainable maritime transport, fostering the role of ports in the facilitation of offshore wind farms and renewable energy production, ICT systems for transport and hydrographic surveys.
Amendment 1115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) the promotion of sustainable and resilient short-sea shipping links, in particular those that concentrate flows of freight in order to reduce negative external costs such as emissions, and congestion from road transport within the Union and those that improve access to outermost and other remote, insular and peripheral regions through the establishment or upgrading of sustainable, regular and frequent maritime services.
Amendment 1116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point d a (new) (da) it is a critical node for the supply of energy in the EU and is instrumental to reach the ambitions of REPowerEU; it is facilitating the operations and maintenance of installations generating more than 1000 MW renewable energy or enabling a substantial share (at least 10%) of the national renewable energy production;
Amendment 1117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point j (j) associated equipment, which may include, in particular, equipment for traffic and cargo management, for the reduction of negative effects on the environment, for improving energy efficiency, for the reduction of noise, and for the use of alternative fuels, as well as equipment to ensure year-round navigability, including ice-breaking, hydrological surveys, and for
Amendment 1118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point k a (new) (ka) pipelines inside the port area used for the transport of energy sources and other liquid or gaseous products;
Amendment 1119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point k a (new) (ka) pipelines inside the port area used for the transport of energy sources and other liquid or gaseous products;
Amendment 1120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point k a (new) (ka) infrastructure necessary for facilitating the energy transition, including facilities for the building, conversion and retrofitting of ships
Amendment 1121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point k a (new) (ka) infrastructure facilitating port activities related to offshore wind farms and renewable energy.
Amendment 1122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Infrastructure facilitating port activities related to offshore wind farms and renewable energy
Amendment 1123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4.
Amendment 1124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4.
Amendment 1125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new) (ba) its total annual cargo volume -for bulk and/or for non-bulk cargo handling - exceeds annually 400.000 tonnes and its contribution to the diversification of EU energy supplies and to the acceleration of the roll out of renewable energies is one of the main activities of the port.
Amendment 1126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new) (ba) its total annual cargo volume – for bulk and /or for non-bulk cargo handling – exceeds annually 500.000 tonnes and its contribution to the diversification of EU energy supplies and to the acceleration of the roll-out of renewable energies is a main activity of the port.
Amendment 1127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point c a (new) (ca) it provides the sole point of access, in terms of maritime ports, inland waterway ports or railway, to a NUTS 3 region, and is located outside a radius of 200 km from the nearest other port in the comprehensive network;
Amendment 1128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point c b (new) (cb) it can significantly support EU climate ambitions by facilitating significant amount of off-shore renewable energy and is located in an Urban Node of a NUTS 2 Region where the NUTS 2 Region does not already have a port on the TEN-T network, and is located outside a radius of 100 km from the nearest other port in the comprehensive network;
Amendment 1129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point d (d) it is located in an outermost region or a peripheral area, outside a radius of 200 km from the nearest other port in the co
Amendment 1130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new) (da) it is a critical node for the supply and transport of energy into and in the EU and is instrumental to reach the ambitions of REPowerEU; it is facilitating the connectivity, operations and maintenance of installations generating more than 1000 MW renewable energy or enabling a substantial share (at least 10%) of the national renewable energy production, as well as providing the necessary transport infrastructure within the port;
Amendment 1131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new) (da) it is a critical node for the supply and transport of energy into and in the EU and is instrumental to reach the ambitions of REPowerEU; it is facilitating the connectivity, operations and maintenance of installations generating more than 1000 MW renewable energy or enabling a substantial share (at least 10%) of the national renewable energy production, as well as providing the necessary transport infrastructure within the port;
Amendment 1132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new) (da) it is a critical node for the supply and transport of energy into and in the EU and is instrumental to reach the ambitions of REPowerEU; it is facilitating the connectivity, operations and maintenance of installations generating more than 1000MW renewable energy or enabling a substantial share (at least 10%) of the national renewable energy production, as well as providing the necessary transport infrastructure within the port;
Amendment 1133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new) (da) it is a critical node for the supply of energy in the EU and is instrumental to reach the ambitions of REPowerEU; it is facilitating the operations and maintenance of installations generating more than 1000 MW alternative and/or renewable energy or enabling a substantial share (at least 10%) of the national alternative and/or renewable energy production;
Amendment 1134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new) (da) it is a critical node for the supply of energy in the EU and is instrumental to reach the ambitions of REPowerEU; it is facilitating the operations and maintenance of installations generating more than [1000] MW renewable energy or enabling [at least 10%] of the national renewable energy production;
Amendment 1135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point d a (new) (da) it is of strategic importance to the resilience of the Union, including in the areas of the energy transition, energy security, geopolitical position and military mobility.
Amendment 1136 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point d b (new) (db) it is of geopolitical strategic importance and part of national strategic plans in terms of emergency supply chains, military mobility or energy security.
Amendment 1137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point d b (new) (db) it is of geopolitical strategic importance and part of national strategic plans in terms of emergency supply chains, military mobility or energy security.
Amendment 1138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point d b (new) (db) it is of geopolitical strategic importance and part of national strategic plans in terms of emergency supply chains, military mobility or energy security.
Amendment 1139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 – point d b (new) (db) it is of geopolitical strategic importance and part of national strategic plans in terms of emergency supply chains, military mobility or energy security.
Amendment 1140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. (e) It is a critical node for the supply of energy in the EU and is instrumental to reach the ambitions of REPowerEU and the Green Deal; it is facilitating the operations and maintenance of installations generating more than 1000 MW renewable energy or enabling at least 10% of the national renewable energy production
Amendment 1141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. It is considered by its Member State as a critical node for the supply of renewable energy in the EU and is considered to be instrumental to reach the ambitions of REPowerEU.
Amendment 1142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. It is of geopolitical strategic importance and part of national strategic plans in terms of emergency supply chains or energy security.
Amendment 1143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions from the minimum requirements referred to in paragraph 4, may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis and include the assessment of specific geopolitical and geographical aspects.
Amendment 1144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Without prejudice to the previous conditions, Member States may exceptionally propose or oppose the inclusion of a port in the comprehensive network in order to respect the relevant requirements established in the port legal framework or system of the Member State concerned.
Amendment 1145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Each Outermost Region shall have at least one maritime port in the core network, if requested by the Member State after consulting the European Commission;
Amendment 1146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. The total annual wind energy volume, derived from both onshore and offshore wind, imported through the maritime port exceeds 0.1% of the total annual wind energy deployed by the Union. The reference amount for this volume is the latest available five-year average, based on the statistics published by Eurostat.
Amendment 1147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 4 c (new) 4c. It can support the ambitions of REPowerEU by facilitating offshore renewable energy and is located in an Urban Node of a NUTS 2 Region where that NUTS2 Region does not have a port on the TEN-T network.
Amendment 1148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) alternative fuels infrastructure is deployed by the managing bodies of the port in maritime ports of the comprehensive network in full compliance with the requirements of Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure];
Amendment 1149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) maritime ports of the comprehensive network are equipped by the managing bodies of the port with the necessary infrastructure to improve the environmental performance of ships in ports, among others reception facilities for the delivery of waste from ships in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/883 of the European Parliament and of the Council61 ;
Amendment 1150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) maritime ports of the comprehensive network are equipped with the necessary infrastructure to improve the environmental performance of ships in ports, particularly allowing full electrification at berth, and among others reception facilities for the delivery of waste from ships in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/883 of the European Parliament and of the Council61 ; __________________ 61 Directive (EU) 2019/883 of the
Amendment 1151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) maritime ports of the comprehensive network are equipped with the necessary infrastructure to improve the environmental performance of ships in ports, among others reception facilities for the delivery of waste from ships in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/883 of the European Parliament and of the Council61 and for disinfection; __________________ 61 Directive (EU) 2019/883 of the
Amendment 1152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) Maritime ports of the comprehensive network continue to benefit from the maintenance and upgrading of the existing infrastructure so as to ensure sufficient capacity and sustainable utilisation to meet customers’ needs.
Amendment 1153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) maritime ports of the comprehensive network will be connected with the rail
Amendment 1154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) maritime ports of the comprehensive network with the total annual cargo flow of more than 3 million tons, will be connected with the rail and road infrastructure and, where possible, inland waterways, except where specific geographic or significant
Amendment 1155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) maritime ports of the comprehensive network will be effectively connected with the rail and road infrastructure and, where possible, inland waterways and airports, except where specific geographic or significant physical constraints prevent such connection;
Amendment 1156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) the managing bodies of the port connect the maritime ports of the comprehensive network
Amendment 1157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point b Amendment 1158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) any maritime port of the comprehensive network that serves freight traffic offers at least one multimodal freight
Amendment 1159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) any maritime port of the comprehensive network that serves freight traffic offers at least one multimodal freight terminal inside the port area or directly connected to the port area, which is open to all operators and users in a non- discriminatory way and which applies transparent and non-discriminatory charges;
Amendment 1160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) any maritime port of the comprehensive network that serves freight traffic offers at least one multimodal freight terminal inside the port area or directly connected to the port area which is open to all operators and users in a non- discriminatory way and which applies transparent and non-discriminatory charges;
Amendment 1161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) any maritime port of the comprehensive network that serves freight traffic offers at least one multimodal freight terminal which is open to all operators and users in a non-discriminatory way and which applies transparent and non-discriminatory charges displayed through a one-stop shop that is also accessible online;
Amendment 1162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) maritime ports of the comprehensive network connected to
Amendment 1163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions from the minimum requirements referred to in paragraph (2), may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis, the assessment of specific geographic or significant physical constraints and
Amendment 1164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 3 3. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions from the minimum requirements referred to in paragraph (2), may be granted by the
Amendment 1165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 3 3. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions from the minimum requirements referred to in paragraph (2), may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis, the assessment of specific geographic or significant physical constraints, such as maritime ports being located on an island, and/or of potential negative impacts on environment and biodiversity.
Amendment 1166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 26 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. By 31 December 2030 the modal share of rail within the intermodal transhipment in maritime port terminals whose freight traffic is more than 1% of EU total maritime freight traffic shall be increased by at least 50%, to the detriment of road freight transport. By 31 December 2050, the modal share of rail, compared to the required modal share of rail in 2030, shall be at least doubled, unless the modal share of rail has reached 80% or more.
Amendment 1167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) upgrading maritime access, when relevant according to a social and environmental cost-benefit analysis including analysis of the potential for modal shift away from road transport, such as breakwaters, sea channels, fairways, locks,
Amendment 1168 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) construction, maintenance or upgrading basic
Amendment 1169 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) construction, maintenance or upgrading basic port infrastructure, such as internal basins, alternative fuels infrastructure, quay walls, berths, jetties, docks, dykes, backfills and land reclamation;
Amendment 1170 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) construction or upgrading basic port infrastructure,
Amendment 1171 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) construction or upgrading basic port infrastructure, such as internal basins, quay walls, berths, jetties, docks, dykes, backfills and land reclamation, adoption of measures to prevent erosion and bioremediation initiatives;
Amendment 1172 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) modernisation and expansion of the capacity of the infrastructure necessary for the transport operations within as well as outside the port area;
Amendment 1173 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) modernisation and expansion of the capacity of the infrastructure necessary for transport operations within as well as outside the port area;
Amendment 1174 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) introduction and promotion of new and not-market ready technologies and innovation for zero and low carbon energy fuels and propulsion systems, with prioritisation for the most environmentally friendly and least carbon intensive energy fuels and propulsion systems, including wind propulsion;
Amendment 1175 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) noise reduction and energy efficiency measures, also through the promotion of emission-reducing navigation techniques, such as slow- steaming;
Amendment 1176 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) promoting zero and low emission vessels serving and operating short-sea shipping links, and developing measures to improve the environmental performance of maritime transport for port call
Amendment 1177 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) promoting zero and low emission vessels serving and operating short-sea
Amendment 1178 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) promoting zero and low emission vessels serving and operating short-sea shipping links, and developing measures to improve the environmental performance of maritime transport for port call
Amendment 1179 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) promoting zero and low emission vessels serving and operating short-sea shipping links, with prioritisation for the most environmentally friendly and least carbon intensive vessels, incorporating where possible wind assistance, and developing measures to
Amendment 1180 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) promoting ferry transport as a sustainable mode of passenger transport, including in urban nodes, where applicable;
Amendment 1181 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) promoting ferry transport as a sustainable mode of passenger transport, including in urban nodes, where applicable;
Amendment 1182 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) promoting ferry transport as a sustainable mode of passenger transport, including in urban nodes, where applicable;
Amendment 1183 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) promoting ferry transport as a sustainable mode of transport, including in urban nodes, where applicable;
Amendment 1184 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) promoting passenger transport by ferry, where possible also in urban nodes;
Amendment 1185 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (ga) deploying or developing onshore power supply to ensure full electrification at berth;
Amendment 1186 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point g b (new) (gb) improving infrastructure with the aim of increasing the share and the amount of freight that transfers from maritime transport to rail transport.
Amendment 1850 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 1 1. Goals and objectives: A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) shall have as central goal improving accessibility of the functional urban area and providing high- quality, safe, affordable and sustainable low-emission mobility to, through and within the functional urban area, for all users. It shall notably support zero- emission mobility and the implementation of an urban transport system which contributes to a better overall performance of the trans-European transport network, in particular through the development of infrastructure for the seamless circulation of zero-emission vehicles as well as of multimodal passenger hubs to facilitate first and last mile connections and of multimodal freight terminals serving urban nodes. It shall in addition contribute to a modal shift towards more sustainable transport modes, including public transport, active modes and electric micromobility, and contribute to the decrease of automotive vehicle use, except for public transport, within and to the urban area.
Amendment 1851 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 1 1. Goals and objectives: A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) shall have as central goal improving accessibility of the
Amendment 1852 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 1 Amendment 1853 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 1 1. Goals and objectives: A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) shall have as central goal improving accessibility of the functional urban area (urban, peri-urban, and rural zones) and providing high- quality, inclusive safe and sustainable low- emission mobility to, through and within the functional urban area. It shall notably support low and zero-emission mobility and the implementation of an urban transport system which contributes to a better overall performance of the trans- European transport network, in particular through the development of infrastructure for the seamless circulation of low and zero-emission vehicles
Amendment 1854 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 2 2. Long-term vision and short-term implementation plan: A SUMP shall include a – or be linked to an existing – long term strategy, including in financial terms, for the future development of transport infrastructure and multi-modal services. It shall also include a delivery plan for the short-term implementation of the strategy. It shall be embedded into an integrated approach for sustainable development of the urban area and linked to relevant land-use and spatial planning.
Amendment 1855 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 2 2. Long-term vision and short-term implementation plan: A SUMP shall include a – or be linked to an existing – long term strategy for the future development of transport infrastructure and multi-modal services. It shall also include a delivery plan for the short-term implementation of the strategy. It shall be embedded into an integrated approach for sustainable and accessible development of the urban area and linked to relevant land- use and spatial planning.
Amendment 1856 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 3 3. Integration of the different modes of transport: A SUMP shall promote multimodal transport through the integration of the different modes and measures aimed at facilitating seamless and sustainable mobility. It shall include actions to increase the modal share of the more
Amendment 1857 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 3 3. Integration of the different modes of transport: A SUMP shall promote multimodal transport through the integration of the different modes and measures aimed at facilitating seamless and sustainable mobility, with prioritisation measures within the traffic flow, as well as street infrastructure and crossings design, to the benefit of active modes such as cycling, electric micromobility and public transport. It shall include actions to increase the modal share of the more sustainable forms of transport such as public transport, active mobility, and, as appropriate, inland waterway and maritime transport, and decrease the modal share and absolute use of less sustainable transport modes such as automotive vehicle use apart from public transport. It shall also include actions to
Amendment 1858 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 3 3. Integration of the different modes of transport: A SUMP shall promote multimodal accessible transport through the integration of the different modes and measures aimed at facilitating seamless and sustainable mobility. It shall include actions to increase the modal share of the more sustainable forms of transport such as public transport, active mobility, and, as appropriate, inland waterway and maritime transport. It shall also include actions to promote zero-emission mobility, in particular with regard to the
Amendment 1859 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 3 3. Integration of the different modes of transport: A SUMP shall promote multimodal accessible transport through the integration of the different modes and measures aimed at facilitating seamless and sustainable mobility. It shall include actions to increase the modal share of the more sustainable forms of transport such as public transport, active mobility, and, as appropriate, inland waterway and maritime transport. It shall also include actions to promote zero-emission mobility, in particular with regard to the greening of the urban fleet, to reduce congestion
Amendment 1860 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 4 4. Effective functioning of TEN-T: A SUMP should duly take into account the impact of various urban measures on the traffic flows, both passenger and freight, on the trans-European transport network with the aim to ensure seamless transit, bypass, or interconnection through and around the urban nodes, including of zero- emission vehicles and of active modes and electric micromobility. It shall in particular include actions to alleviate congestion, improve road safety and remove bottlenecks affecting the traffic flows on the TEN-T.
Amendment 1861 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 4 4. Effective functioning of TEN-T: A SUMP should duly take into account the impact of various urban measures on the traffic flows, both passenger and freight, on the trans-European transport network with the aim to ensure seamless transit, bypass, or interconnection through and around the urban nodes, including of carbon-neutral, low and zero-
Amendment 1862 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 4 4. Effective functioning of TEN-T: A SUMP should duly take into account the impact of various urban measures on the traffic flows, both passenger and freight, on the trans-European transport network with the aim to ensure seamless transit, bypass, or interconnection through and around the urban nodes, including of zero- emission vehicles. It shall in particular include actions to alleviate congestion, improve road safety and remove bottlenecks affecting the traffic flows on the TEN-T. In return TEN-T measures should take into account effects on regional and local traffic flows, both for passengers and freight.
Amendment 1863 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 4 a (new) 4 a. Safety and accessibility: A SUMP shall include a strategy to ensure that all trips in the urban area are safely reachable both by walking and cycling, and infrastructure to ensure this should be fully accessible for people using mobility aids. Wherever separation of active modes from motorised traffic is not feasible or justified, traffic speeds not exceeding 30 km/h shall be ensured. More space shall be devoted to pedestrians in the streets, particularly in urban centres and dense areas, with limitations to the motorised vehicles, except public transport, where appropriate, in order to reduce congestion and ensure safety and space for all ages and mobility needs. Pedestrian and cycling paths shall be separated into separate carriageways wherever feasible. The strategy shall include measures to ensure proper lighting of pedestrian and cycling paths, as well as plans to handle interruptions and hinders such as by construction or damages to the infrastructure, snow or icy conditions, to ensure full continued accessibility, also for people using mobility aids.
Amendment 1864 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 5 5. Participatory approach: The development and implementation of a SUMP shall be based on an integrated approach with a high level of cooperation, coordination and consultation between the different levels of government and relevant authorities
Amendment 1865 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 5 5. Participatory approach: The development and implementation of a SUMP shall be based on an integrated approach with a high level of cooperation, coordination and consultation between the different levels of government and relevant authorities
Amendment 1866 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 5 5. Participatory approach: The development and implementation of a SUMP shall be based on an integrated approach with a high level of cooperation, coordination and consultation between the different levels of government and relevant
Amendment 1867 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 5 5. Participatory approach: The development and implementation of a SUMP shall be based on an integrated approach with a high level of cooperation, coordination and consultation between the different levels of government and relevant authorities. Citizens, accessibility experts, as well as representatives of civil society and economic actors shall also be involved.
Amendment 1868 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 6 6. Monitoring and performance
Amendment 1869 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 6 6. Monitoring and performance indicators: A SUMP shall include objectives, targets and indicators underpinning the current and future performance of the urban transport system, at minimum, on greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and
Amendment 1870 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 6 6. Monitoring and performance indicators: A SUMP shall include objectives, targets and indicators underpinning the current and future performance of the urban transport system, at minimum, on greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access to mobility services, as well as data on air and noise pollution in
Amendment 1871 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 6 6. Monitoring and performance indicators: A SUMP shall include objectives, targets and indicators underpinning the current and future performance of the urban transport system, at minimum, on greenhouse gas emissions, improved management of traffic flows, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access to mobility services and infrastructure to all users, as well as data on air and noise pollution in cities. The implementation of a SUMP shall be monitored using performance indicators. Member States and the relevant authorities shall implement mechanisms to ensure that a SUMP is in line with the provisions of this Annex and of high quality.
Amendment 1872 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex VI – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point j Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 Annex – part III – point 1 (j) the thirty-fifth row with the title ‘Core network corridor “Scandinavian – Mediterranean”’ and the thirty-sixth row containing its alignment is deleted
Amendment 827 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part (a) railway lines, both high speed and conventional, including:
Amendment 828 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part (a) railway lines, both high speed and conventional, including:
Amendment 829 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part (a) railway lines, both high speed and conventional including:
Amendment 830 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – point vi a (new) (via) railway ferry lines;
Amendment 831 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – point vi a (new) (via) railway ferry lines;
Amendment 832 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – point vii a (new) (viia) bicycle parking in the vicinity of stations;
Amendment 833 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the rail access routes
Amendment 834 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the rail access routes
Amendment 835 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) the rail access routes and last mile rail connections to multimodal freight terminals connected by rail, including in inland and maritime ports and airports
Amendment 836 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) the port rail networks until the rail handover point(s), where the trains are transferred to the public rail network;
Amendment 837 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) the port rail networks until the rail handover point(s), where the trains are transferred to the public rail network;
Amendment 838 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (ha) in bottleneck sections between two cross-border urban nodes railway transport infrastructure shall also include metro/light rail.
Amendment 839 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 2 2. The technical equipment associated with railway lines may include electrification systems, equipment for the boarding and alighting of passengers and the loading and unloading of cargo in stations and terminals, as well as innovative technologies in their deployment phase. It also include equipment and facilities, in so far they are not covered by in corresponding TEN-E Regulation, necessary to ensure the safe and efficient transport of carbon dioxide towards its permanent storage site via rail.
Amendment 840 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the comprehensive network,
Amendment 841 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d)
Amendment 842 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d) and where relevant connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (da), by 31 December 2050:
Amendment 843 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) is
Amendment 844 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) provides for a nominal track gauge for new railway lines of 1435 mm, except where the new railway line is an extension on a network the track gauge of which is different and detached from the main rail lines in the Union;
Amendment 845 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) provides for a nominal track gauge for new railway lines of 1435 mm, except where the new railway line is an extension on a network the track gauge of which is different and detached from the main rail lines in the Union;
Amendment 846 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) provides for a nominal track gauge for new railway lines of 1435 mm, except where the new line is an extension on a network the track gauge of which is different and detached from the main rail lines in the Union or does not interfere with the interoperability and implementation of the corridor;
Amendment 847 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) enables
Amendment 848 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) enables
Amendment 849 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 850 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point d Amendment 851 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point d – point i (i) on double track lines,
Amendment 852 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point d – point i (i) on double track lines, at least 50% of the train paths for freight trains
Amendment 853 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point d – point i (i) on double track lines, at least 50% of the available train paths for freight trains, and not
Amendment 854 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point d – point i (i) on double track lines, at least 50% of the available train paths for freight trains, and not less than two train paths per hour and direction on average, can be allocated to freight trains with a length of at least 740 m;
Amendment 855 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point d – point ii Amendment 856 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point d – point ii Amendment 857 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point d – point ii (ii) on single track lines, at least
Amendment 858 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point d – point ii (ii) on single track lines, at least one train path per
Amendment 859 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e Amendment 860 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e (e)
Amendment 861 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e (e)
Amendment 862 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e (e)
Amendment 863 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) provides a standard of at least P400 on a list of predefined international rail freight routes of the TEN-T network suitable to upgrade, established by the Member States upon consultation with the European Commission, the rail freight corridors and all rail operators in accordance with item 1.1.1.1.3.5 of Table 1 in the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU)
Amendment 864 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e (e) provides a standard of at least P400 on a list of predefined international rail freight routes of the TEN-T network suitable to upgrade, established by the Member States upon consultation with the European Commission, the rail freight corridors and all rail operators in accordance with item 1.1.1.1.3.5 of Table 1 in the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/77757 , without any additional requirement for special permission to operate services
Amendment 865 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (ea) does not constitute a barrier to active modes; at least twice as many safe and comfortable crossings across the line tracks shall be provided for cycling as for motorised vehicles;
Amendment 866 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e b (new) (eb) enables passenger trips to be combined with active modes, including by providing secure bicycle parking in adequate numbers at the stations and cycle connections with nearby settlements at least in the area of 4 km around the station;
Amendment 867 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e c (new) (ec) enables effective realisation of the passenger rights established in Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2021/782. All the railway station’s platforms must be accessible with ramps or lifts allowing transport of bicycles.
Amendment 868 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The requirements set out in paragraph 2 points (c), (d) and (e) shall apply only on those lines of the comprehensive network which: (i) connect urban nodes with the core or extended core freight network and or a multimodal freight terminal or a maritime or an inland port with its closest crossing point, or (ii) are capable to operate more than twenty freight trains per day on average in both directions based on the data for the previous year and prospected investments on the same line.
Amendment 869 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), by 31 December 2040 is fully electrified as regards line tracks and, to the extent necessary for electric train operations, as regards sidings.
Amendment 870 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point a (a)
Amendment 871 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) isolated networks are exempted from the requirements under paragraph 2, points (a)
Amendment 872 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) at the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, other exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements referred to in paragraph 2. This does not apply to the full electrification requirements under paragraph 2, point (a). Any request for exemption shall be based on a soci
Amendment 873 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) at the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, other exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements referred to in paragraph 2. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis
Amendment 874 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) at the request of a Member State, or a regional authority, in duly justified cases, other exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements referred to in paragraph 2. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio- economic cost-benefit analysis and an assessment of the impact on interoperability. An exemption shall comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council58 , be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable. __________________ 58 Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the
Amendment 875 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) at the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, other exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements referred to in paragraph 2. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis that takes national transport infrastructure planning and especially a European corridor perspective into consideration, as well as and an assessment of the impact on interoperability. An exemption shall comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council58 , be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable. __________________ 58 Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the
Amendment 876 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) at the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, other exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements referred to in paragraph 2. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis that takes national transport infrastructure planning and especially a European corridor perspective into consideration, as well as and an assessment of the impact on interoperability. An exemption shall comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council58 , be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable. __________________ 58 Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the
Amendment 877 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Without prejudice to paragraph 3, upon request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions shall be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of requirements referred to in this Article on the ground of specific geographical or significant physical constraints, negative result of socio-economic cost-benefit analysis or potential negative impacts on environment or biodiversity. Any such request shall be substantiated with sufficient justification. The request for exemptions shall be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) in case of cross-border sections. A Member State may request the granting of several exemptions in a single request.
Amendment 878 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the core network and extended core network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), by 31 December 2030 is fully electrified as regards line tracks and, to the extent necessary for electric train operations, as regards sidings.
Amendment 879 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the extended core network,
Amendment 880 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the extended core network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1),point (d) and where relevant connections referred to in Article14(1), point (da), by 31 December 2040:
Amendment 881 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the extended core network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d) and where relevant connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (da), by 31 December 2040:
Amendment 882 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) meets the requirements set out in Article 15(2), points (a) to (
Amendment 883 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) meets the requirements set out in Article 15(2), points (a) to (e), and of a prevailing minimum operational line speed
Amendment 884 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point a a (new) Amendment 885 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point a b (new) Amendment 886 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point a c (new) Amendment 887 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) meets the requirements set out in Article 15(2), point
Amendment 888 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 1 allows for a prevailing minimum line speed of 1
Amendment 889 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 1 allows for a prevailing minimum operational line speed of 160 km/h for passenger trains on the passenger lines of the extended core network
Amendment 890 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 1 allows for a prevailing minimum line speed of 160 km/h for passenger trains on the passenger lines of the extended core network, given market need and provided that the increase in speed does not lead to an overall reduction of rail capacity;
Amendment 891 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 1 allows for a prevailing minimum line speed of 160 km/h for passenger trains on the passenger lines of the extended core network; provided that there is a market need and that the increase does not reduce the overall rail capacity.
Amendment 892 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 1 (c) allows for a prevailing minimum line speed of 160 km/h for passenger trains on the passenger lines
Amendment 893 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 1 allows for a prevailing minimum line speed of 160 km/h for passenger trains, where the topography allows, on the passenger lines of the extended core
Amendment 894 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 1 allows for a prevailing minimum operational line speed of 160 km/h for passenger trains on the passenger lines of the extended core network;
Amendment 895 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 2 If the topography does not allow for above speed parameters, the requirements may not be applied without exemption procedure. When constructing or upgrading a passenger line of the extended core network or sections thereof, Member States shall perform a study to analyse the feasibility and economic relevance of higher speeds, and build or upgrade the line to such higher speed where its feasibility and economic relevance are demonstrated.
Amendment 896 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 2 When constructing or upgrading a passenger line of the extended core network or sections thereof, Member States shall perform a study to analyse the feasibility and economic relevance of higher speeds, including its impact on existing and planned freight traffic capacity, and build or upgrade the line to such higher speed where its feasibility and economic relevance are demonstrated and does not impact negatively on rail freight traffic.
Amendment 897 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the core network,
Amendment 898 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) meets the requirements set out in Article 15(2), points (a) to (d), and of a prevailing minimum operational line speed of 100 km/h for freight trains on the freight lines of the core network; Rail networks used for freight and passenger traffic shall receive a derogation from Article 15(2), point d, for a limited time period from 2030 to 2040. They shall be required to comply with the following conditions: (i) on double track lines, at least 50% of the train paths for freight trains per day, and not less than two train paths on average per hour and direction over a period of one day , can be allocated to freight trains with a length of at least 740 m; (ii) on single track lines, at least one train path per two hours and direction can be allocated to freight trains with a length of at least 740 m;
Amendment 899 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the core network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d) and where relevant connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (da), by 31 December 2030:
Amendment 900 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) meets the requirements set out in Article 1
Amendment 901 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point a (a) meets the requirements set out in Article 15(2), points (a) to (d), and of a prevailing minimum operational line speed of 100 km/h, where the topography allows, for freight trains on the freight lines of the core network;
Amendment 902 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 (new) If the topography does not allow for above speed parameters, the requirements may not be applied without exemption procedure.
Amendment 903 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new) (ba) meets the requirements that allow to eliminate all capacity barriers in cross- border sections on the core network;
Amendment 904 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases where a Member States is affected by specific geographic or significant physical constraints which prevent requirements on prevailing minimum operational line speed pursuant to points (a) and (ba) of this paragraph being complied with on its rail lines on the core network, the Commission may adopt implementing acts granting exemptions to those requirements.
Amendment 905 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the core network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), by 31 December 20
Amendment 906 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the core network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), by 31 December 20
Amendment 907 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the core network,
Amendment 908 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – introductory part 4. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the core network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d) and where relevant connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (da), by 31 December 2040:
Amendment 909 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new) (ba) are equipped with technical devices (train control points) at a maximum distance of 100 km, which automatically check the technical condition (axle load, loading gauge, running gear condition, "hot axle boxes") of passing trains.
Amendment 910 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new) (ba) is upgraded to double-track or equipped with passing loops to an extent that ensures uninterrupted flow of traffic in both directions.
Amendment 911 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 4 – point b b (new) (bb) are equipped with safe routes, modern accommodation, modern break areas (cooling, heating, hygiene) and sanitary facilities for all employees.;
Amendment 912 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 – point a Amendment 913 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 – point a (a)
Amendment 914 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 – point a (a)
Amendment 915 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 – point b (b) at the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, other exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements referred to in paragraphs 2 to 4. This does not apply to the full electrification requirements under article 15, paragraph 2, point (a). Any exemption shall be based on a soci
Amendment 916 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 – point b (b) at the request of a Member State or a regional authority, in duly justified cases, other exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements referred to in paragraphs 2 to 4. Any exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost- benefit analysis and an assessment of the impact on
Amendment 917 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 – point b (b) at the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, other exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements referred to in paragraphs 2 to 4. Any exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis and an assessment of the impact on interoperability and the circulation of freight trains. An exemption shall comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/797, be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable.
Amendment 918 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 a (new) Amendment 919 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Without prejudice to paragraph 4, upon at the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions shall be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of requirements referred to in this article on the ground of specific geographical or significant physical constraints, negative result of socio-economic cost-benefit analysis or potential negative impacts on environment or biodiversity. Any such request shall be substantiated with sufficient justification. The request for exemptions shall be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) in case of cross-border sections. A Member State may request the granting of several exemptions in a single request.
Amendment 920 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. To comply with enhanced and new infrastructure requirements, notably with Article 15, paragraph 2 (e), Article 16, paragraph 2 (c), 4 (a) and 4(b), EU funding shall be sufficient to ensure their timely implementation.
Amendment 921 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. To comply with enhanced and new infrastructure requirements, notably with Article 15, paragraph 2 (e), Article 16, paragraph 2 (c), 4 (a) and 4(b), public funding must be sufficient to ensure their timely implementation.
Amendment 922 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 a (new) Amendment 923 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 a (new) Amendment 924 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 a (new) Amendment 925 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 a (new) Amendment 926 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 a (new) Article 16a Member States may identify in the migration plan the railway lines which will not migrate to the European standard nominal track gauge of 1 435 mm. The migration plan shall include a socio- economic cost-benefit analysis justifying the decision not to migrate the railway lines to the European standard nominal track gauge of 1 435 mm and an assessment of the impact on interoperability. When setting the track width requirements and evaluating the effects, the geographic location of the member country and its effect on the interoperability of the member country's rail network with the European standard gauge should be taken into account.
Amendment 927 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 b (new) Article 16b If a Member State with a different railway gauge compared to the European one, intends to build new railways or prepare existing ones which are in the TEN-T core network, the European Commission shall prepare a plan together with that Member State and allocate financial assistance for those Member States from the Connecting Europe Facility.
Amendment 928 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that
Amendment 929 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that on the railway infrastructure of the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), by 31 December 20
Amendment 930 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that on the railway infrastructure of the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d) and where relevant connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (da), by 31 December 2040:
Amendment 931 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a)
Amendment 932 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped trackside and on board of all trains on all TEN-T networks, while all means of useful cooperation between Member States, Infrastructure Managers and Transport Operators are adopted to ensure the deployment of a synchronised and harmonised ERTMS deployment;
Amendment 933 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped trackside and on board of all trains on all TEN-T networks, while all means of useful cooperation between Member States, Infrastructure Managers and Transport Operators are adopted to ensure the a synchronised and harmonised ERTMS deployment;
Amendment 934 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped, especially in those areas which still do not have this essential service, despite forming part of the extended core network;
Amendment 935 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped, whilst a synchronised and harmonised ERTMS deployment of tracksides and onboards is ensured.;
Amendment 936 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped, whilst a synchronised and harmonised ERTMS deployment of tracksides and onboards is ensured;
Amendment 937 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped whilst a synchronised and harmonised ERTMS deployment of tracksides and onboards is ensured;
Amendment 938 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped whilst a synchronised and harmonised ERTMS deployment of tracksides and onboards is ensured;
Amendment 939 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped
Amendment 940 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped
Amendment 941 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped and interoperable at cross-border connections;
Amendment 942 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b (b)
Amendment 943 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) class B systems are decommissioned unless technically required by the infrastructure managers in exceptional and justified cases while guaranteeing interoperability through ERTMS deployment in line with the timeline.
Amendment 944 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) class B systems are decommissioned, unless technically required by the infrastructure managers in exceptional and justified cases while guaranteeing interoperability through ERTMS deployment in line with the timeline.
Amendment 945 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) class B systems are decommissioned unless technically required by the infrastructure managers in exceptional and justified cases while guaranteeing interoperability through ERTMS deployment in line with the timeline.
Amendment 946 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) class B systems are decommissioned
Amendment 947 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) class B systems are decommissioned unless they are designed to operate a public transport system requiring greater efficiency and traffic volume management capacity than that allowed by ERTMS capacity in an urban node.
Amendment 948 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) class B systems are decommissioned
Amendment 949 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) class B systems are decommissioned, unless designed to perform in a mass transit system in urban nodes.
Amendment 950 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that by 31 December 2030: – the railway infrastructure of the core network
Amendment 951 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the core network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d) and where relevant connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (da), by 31 December 2030 meets the requirements of paragraph 1, point (a).
Amendment 952 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 Amendment 953 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the core network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d) and where relevant connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (da), by 31 December 2040 meets the requirement of paragraph 1, point (b).
Amendment 954 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d) and where relevant connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (da), is equipped with radio-based ERTMS by 31 December 2050.
Amendment 955 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), is equipped with
Amendment 956 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall ensure that on the railway infrastructure of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network
Amendment 957 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall ensure that on the railway infrastructure of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), as of 31 December 2025, in case of construction of a new line or upgrade of the signalling system,
Amendment 958 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall ensure that on the railway infrastructure of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d) and where relevant connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (da), as of 31 December 2025, in case of construction of a new line or upgrade of the signalling system, radio-based ERTMS is being deployed.
Amendment 959 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall ensure that on the railway infrastructure of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), as of 31 December 2025, in case of construction of a new line or upgrade the train protection part of a CCS subsystem being in service, when the upgrading changes the functions or the performance of the subsystem of the signalling system, radio-based ERTMS is being deployed.
Amendment 960 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall ensure that on the railway infrastructure of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), as of 31 December 2025, in case of construction of a new line or upgrade of the
Amendment 961 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall ensure that on the railway infrastructure of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), as of 31 December 2025, in case of construction of a new line or upgrade of the
Amendment 962 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 5. Member States shall ensure that on the railway infrastructure of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), as of 31 December 2025, in case of construction of a new line or upgrade
Amendment 963 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. Member States shall ensure that radio-based ERTMS is deployed by 31 December 2050 on connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network, where such equipment is deemed necessary by the Member State concerned in coordination with the relevant stakeholders, in particular the infrastructure manager. In case of construction of a new line, such deployment shall be ensured as of 31 December 2030.
Amendment 964 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. The trackside and on board deployment of ERTMS should be facilitated by adequate funding, including EU financing.
Amendment 965 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. The requirements set out in paragraphs 1 to 5 do not apply to isolated networks.
Amendment 966 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. The requirements set out in paragraphs 1 to 5 do not apply to isolated networks.
Amendment 967 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 968 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 6.
Amendment 969 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 6. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions
Amendment 970 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 6. At the request of a Member State, only in duly justified cases, exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of requirements referred to in paragraphs 1 to 5. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio
Amendment 971 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 6. At the request of a Member State, only in duly justified cases, exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of requirements referred to in paragraphs 1 to 5. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis and an assessment of the impact on interoperability, on track capacity as well as the railway sector’s implementation capacity and the Railway Supply Industry Readiness Level. An exemption shall comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council59 , be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable. The exemptions granted by the Commission shall take duly consider the deployment progress along the whole Network and shall not endanger the deployment with the deadlines set. The exemptions shall duly consider the necessary operational maintenance. The exemptions shall also reflect the availability of national and European fundings. __________________ 59 Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the
Amendment 972 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 6. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of requirements referred to in paragraphs 1 to 5. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis and an assessment of the impact on interoperability, on track capacity as well as the railway sector’s implementation capacity and the Railway Supply Industry Readiness Level. An exemption shall comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council59 , be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable. The exemptions granted by the Commission shall take duly consider the deployment progress along the whole Network and shall not endanger the deployment with the deadlines set. The exemptions shall duly consider the necessary operational maintenance. The exemptions shall also reflect the availability of national and European fundings. __________________ 59 Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the
Amendment 973 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 6. At the request of a Member State, only in duly justified cases, exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of requirements referred to in paragraphs 1 to 5. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis and an assessment of the impact on interoperability on track capacity as well as the railway sector’s implementation capacity and the Railway Supply Industry Readiness Level. An exemption shall comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council59 , be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable. The exemptions granted by the Commission shall take duly consider the deployment progress along the whole Network and shall not endanger the deployment with the deadlines set. The exemptions shall duly consider the necessary operational maintenance. __________________ 59 Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the
Amendment 974 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 6. At the request of a Member State, only in duly justified cases, exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of requirements referred to in paragraphs 1 to 5. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio
Amendment 975 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 6. At the request of a Member State, only in duly justified cases, partial exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of requirements referred to in paragraphs 1 to 5. Any request for exemption shall be based on a soci
Amendment 976 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 6. At the request of a Member State or a regional authority, in duly justified cases, exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of requirements referred to in paragraphs 1 to 5. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio- economic cost-benefit analysis and an assessment of the impact on interoperability. An exemption shall comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council59 , be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable. __________________ 59 Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the
Amendment 977 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 6. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of requirements referred to in paragraphs 1 to 5, especially tracks from the last point to the freight terminal in inland and maritime ports of the TEN-T network. Any request for exemption shall be
Amendment 978 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Member States shall ensure that the concerned actors are duly informed about ERTMS deployment at least 3 years before the ETCS trackside deployment and 5 years before the decommissioning of class B systems. A shorter period is allowed if this is agreed between the IMs and the concerned actors and duly notified to the Member State through the ERTMS National Implementation Plan aiming at ensuring the synchronised and harmonised trackside/on-board ERTMS national deployment
Amendment 979 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Member States shall ensure that the concerned actors are duly informed about ERTMS deployment at least 3 years before the ETCS trackside deployment and 5 years before the decommissioning of class B systems. A shorter period is allowed if this is agreed between the IMs and the concerned actors and duly notified to the Member State through the ERTMS National Implementation Plan aiming at ensuring the synchronised and harmonised trackside/on-board ERTMS national deployment
Amendment 980 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Member States shall ensure that the concerned actors are duly informed about ERTMS deployment at least x (3) years before the ETCS trackside deployment and y (5) years before the decommissioning of class B systems. A shorter period is allowed if this is agreed between the IMs and the concerned actors and duly notified to the Member State through the ERTMS National Implementation Plan aiming at ensuring the synchronised and harmonised trackside/on-board ERTMS national deployment
Amendment 981 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Member States should timely inform the concerned parts about ERTMS deployment before the ETCS trackside deployment and before the decommissioning of class B systems. A shorter period is allowed if this is agreed between the IMs and the concerned actors and duly notified to the Member State through the ERTMS National Implementation Plan aiming at ensuring the synchronised and harmonised trackside/on-board ERTMS national deployment.
Amendment 982 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. The Commission shall provide in maximum two years from the date of entry in force of this Regulation the legislative framework for developing the digital European Rail Traffic Management and for establishing the Rail Network Manager.
Amendment 983 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. The European Commission shall ensure regulatory alignment of this Regulation and the Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSI CCS and TSI INF) implying the alignment of provisions as well as the effective implementation.
Amendment 984 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. As part of the ETCS, the Digital Automatic Coupling should be provided with sufficient EU funds;
Amendment 985 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Isolated networks are exempted from the requirements under paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5;
Amendment 986 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of requirements referred to in paragraphs 1 to 5. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost-benefit analysis and an assessment of the impact on interoperability. An exemption shall comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council59 , be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable.
Amendment 987 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. The European Commission shall ensure regulatory alignment of this Regulation and the Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSI CCS and TSI INF) implying the alignment of provisions as well as the effective implementation.
Amendment 988 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. The European Commission shall ensure regulatory alignment of this Regulation and the Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSI CCS and TSI INF) implying the alignment of provisions as well as the effective implementation.
Amendment 989 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. The European Commission shall ensure regulatory alignment of this Regulation and the Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSI CCS and TSI INF) implying the alignment of provisions as well as the effective implementation.
Amendment 990 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 c (new) 6c. The European Commission shall ensure regulatory alignment of this Regulation and the Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSI CCS and TSI INF)implying the alignment of provisions as well as the effective implementation.
Amendment 991 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. The level of public funding of ERTMS implementation trackside and on board of trains shall be increased to 100% thereby reflecting the significance of an ERTMS implementation according to the deadlines set in this Regulation to increase rail capacity.
Amendment 992 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. ERTMS should be 100% publicly funded trackside and on board.
Amendment 993 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 b (new) 6b. ERTMS should be 100% publicly funded trackside and on board.
Amendment 994 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 6 d (new) 6d. The European Commission shall adopt by 31.12.2023 a proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European ERTMS Deployment Agency to be the entity in charge of deploying ERTMS on the rail network as specified by art 17.1. The Agency, in cooperation with Member States and ERA, will be responsible of deployment activities for the evolution and future generations of the systems, and contribution to the definition of service evolutions.
Amendment 995 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 Amendment 996 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 Amendment 997 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that, by 31 December 2030, the quality of services
Amendment 998 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that, by 31 December 2030, the quality of services
Amendment 999 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that, by 31 December 2030, the quality of services provided by infrastructure managers
source: 738.577
2022/11/21
TRAN
444 amendments...
Amendment 1187 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a – point iv a (new) (iva) green bridges or overpasses for fauna;
Amendment 1188 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a – point x a (new) (xa) pedestrian and cycle tracks, bridges, tunnels and other active modes infrastructure;
Amendment 1189 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a – point x a (new) (xa) infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists
Amendment 1190 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a – point x b (new) (xb) noise mitigation technologies;
Amendment 1191 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) access routes and last mile connection to multimodal passenger hubs, including infrastructure for active modes;
Amendment 1192 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 3 3. Equipment associated with roads may include, in particular, equipment for traffic management, information and route guidance, for the levying of tolls or user charges, for safety, for reducing negative environmental effects,
Amendment 1193 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the roads are
Amendment 1194 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the roads are
Amendment 1195 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (ha) facilities for safe and secure parking incorporate recharging facilities with enough capacity and power output, including fast charging terminals, to allow electric recharging during resting times;
Amendment 1196 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (ha) Where applicable, parts of TEN-T roads designated for automated driving will need to be designed, built, or upgraded and maintained to meet minimum performance standards ensuring the safe use of automated vehicles, including: - Visibility and state of the traffic signs, signals, and road markings, including: Minimal width of markings, use of contrast markings, proper removal of old markings, common minimal dimensions of warning, prohibitory and mandatory road signs, minimum class of retroreflective materials. - Surface quality and grip requirements. - A fail safe infrastructure design in line with the Safe System approach.
Amendment 1197 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point a Amendment 1198 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point a – introductory part (a) the road is specially
Amendment 1199 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) provides, except at special points or temporarily, separate carriageways for the two directions of traffic, separated from each other by a dividing strip not intended for traffic or
Amendment 1200 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) rest areas are available at a maximum distance of 60 km from each other, providing sufficient parking space, safety and security equipment, and appropriate facilities, including sanitary facilities, that meet the needs of a diverse workforce; Access to parking space and these facilities is free to users as costs are borne by general infrastructure fees or tolls.
Amendment 1201 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) rest areas are available at a maximum distance of 60 km from each other, providing sufficient parking space, safety and security equipment, and appropriate facilities, including sanitary facilities, that meet the needs of a diverse workforce, with particular attention to the gender dimension;
Amendment 1202 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point c Amendment 1203 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) when appropriate according to needs, and projected induced demand, of active mobility and electric micromobility infrastructure, as roads are designed, built or upgraded, this shall include connected and parallel active mobility and electric micromobility infrastructure, taking into account especially the EuroVelo network;
Amendment 1204 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) the road has a parallel cycle track or an alternative route for active modes.
Amendment 1205 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new) (db) the road does not constitute a barrier to active modes; at least twice as many safe and comfortable crossings across the road shall be provided for cycling as for motorised vehicles; in and next to built-up areas the distance between crossings for active modes should not exceed 400 m.
Amendment 1206 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new) (db) speed limitations are lowered, where appropriate, and if the Member State wishes according to dynamic speed management, to ensure higher safety on roads, under certain atmospheric conditions and/or for energy saving purposes;
Amendment 1207 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States shall ensure that by 31 December 2027, safe and secure parking areas are available on 15% of the length of the TEN-T comprehensive network and at a maximum distance of 100 km from each other, providing a sufficient parking space for commercial vehicles and complying with the requirements set out in Article 8(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2020/1054. Member States shall ensure that by 31 December 2030, safe and secure parking areas are available on 30% of the length of the TEN-T comprehensive network and at a maximum distance of 100 km from each other, providing a sufficient parking space for commercial vehicles and complying with the requirements set out in Article 8(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2020/1054. Member States shall ensure that by 31 December 2035, safe and secure parking areas are available on 50% of the length of the TEN-T comprehensive network and at a maximum distance of 100 km from each other, providing a sufficient parking space for commercial vehicles and complying with the requirements set out in Article 8(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2020/1054. Member States shall ensure that by 31 December 2040, safe and secure parking areas are sufficiently available on the entire length of the TEN-T comprehensive network and at a maximum distance of 100 km from each other, providing a sufficient parking space for commercial vehicles and complying with the requirements set out in Article 8(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2020/1054. Member States shall ensure that alternative fuels infrastructure is available at each safe and secure parking area, in full compliance with the requirements of Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure].
Amendment 1208 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 1209 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure, by 31 December 2030, the deployment or use of the means to detect safety-related events or conditions, and collection of the relevant road traffic data, for the purpose of providing road safety-related minimum
Amendment 1210 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. Member States shall ensure, by 31 December 2030, the readability and detectability of road signs and road markings to achieve optimal effectiveness of the advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) mandated in the General Safety Regulation for motor vehicles (EU 2019/2144), and in line with Article 6c of the Road Infrastructure Safety Management Directive (EU2019/1936). The road signs and markings should meet EU-wide agreed minimum performance requirements on the visibility and state of the traffic signs, signals, and road markings, including: - Minimal width of markings. - Use of contrast markings. - Proper removal of old markings. - Common minimal dimensions of warning, prohibitory and mandatory road signs. - Minimum class of retroreflective materials.
Amendment 1211 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 4 4. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions from the requirement set out in paragraph 2, point (a), may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts, in particular where the traffic density does not exceed 10,000 vehicles per day in both directions, or when there are specific geographic or significant physical constraints, as long as an appropriate level of safety is ensured. Any request for exemption shall be based on a soci
Amendment 1212 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 1213 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 4 b (new) 4b. Member States shall ensure that high-capacity vehicles as defined by Article 4(4) (b) of Directive 96/53/EC are allowed to operate on the road infrastructure, including tunnels and bridges, of the core network and extended core network.
Amendment 1214 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 1215 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that the road infrastructure of the core network and extended core network meets the requirements set out in Article 29(2), points (a),
Amendment 1216 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that the road infrastructure of the core network and extended core network meets the
Amendment 1217 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that the road infrastructure of the core network and extended core network meets the requirements set out in Article 29(2), points (a)
Amendment 1218 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that the road infrastructure of
Amendment 1219 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States shall ensure that by 31 December 2027, safe and secure parking areas are available on 30% of the length of the TEN-T core and extended core networks and at a maximum distance of 100 km from each other, providing a sufficient parking space for commercial vehicles and complying with the requirements set out in Article 8(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2020/1054. Member States shall ensure that by 31 December 2030, safe and secure parking areas are available on 60% of the length of the TEN-T core and extended core networks and at a maximum distance of 100 km from each other, providing a sufficient parking space for commercial vehicles and complying with the requirements set out in Article 8(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2020/1054. Member States shall ensure that by 31 December 2035, safe and secure parking areas are sufficiently available on the entire length of the TEN-T core and extended core networks and at a maximum distance of 100 km from each other, providing a sufficient parking space for commercial vehicles and complying with the requirements set out in Article 8(1), point (a), of Regulation (EU) 2020/1054. Member States shall ensure that alternative fuels infrastructure is available at each safe and secure parking area, in full compliance with the requirements of Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure].
Amendment 1220 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 2 a (new) Amendment 1221 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that the road infrastructure of the core network
Amendment 1222 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that the road infrastructure of the core network and extended core network meets the requirements set out in Article 29(2), points (b) and (c), by 31 December 2030.
Amendment 1223 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure that the road infrastructure of the core network and extended core network meets the requirements set out in Article 29(2), point (b) and (c), by 31 December 2030.
Amendment 1224 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States shall ensure that the road infrastructure of the core network and extended network meet the requirements set out in Article29(3b) by 31 December 2028.
Amendment 1225 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 5 5. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions from the requirement set out in Article 29 (2), point (a), may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts, in particular where the traffic density does not exceed 10,000 vehicles per day in both directions, or when there are specific geographic or significant physical constraints, as long as
Amendment 1226 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 5 5. At the request of a Member State,
Amendment 1227 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – introductory part In the promotion of projects of common interest related to road infrastructure, for which capacity expansions shall not be eligible, and in addition to the general priorities set out in Articles 12 and 13, attention shall be given to the following:
Amendment 1228 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) improvement and promotion of
Amendment 1229 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) mitigation of congestion on existing roads, in particular through intelligent traffic management, including dynamic congestion charges or tolls varied based on the time of day, week or season, and potentially the introduction of slots for freight vehicles, or distance-based carbon taxation;
Amendment 1230 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) overall reduction of the amount and share of road transport for both freight and passenger transport, in order to facilitate a modal shift to more sustainable transport modes;
Amendment 1231 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b b (new) (bb) facilitating increased usage of public transport by, for example, creating separate lanes for public transport in order to increase its effectiveness and attractiveness;
Amendment 1232 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) introduction of innovative, including digital technologies to improve the control of compliance with the Union road transport legal framework, including smart and automated enforcement tools and 5G communication infrastructure;
Amendment 1233 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) introduction of innovative technologies to improve the control of compliance with the Union road transport legal framework, including smart and
Amendment 1234 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) when building or upgrading road infrastructure,
Amendment 1235 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) In Member States with scheduled restrictions preventing the circulation of heavy goods vehicles, transport on the TEN-T networks must remain fully unimpeded order to maintain the flow of goods.
Amendment 1236 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) integrating cycling infrastructure within civil engineering structures such as bridges and tunnels.
Amendment 1237 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 a (new) when building or upgrading road infrastructure, ensure the continuity and accessibility of pedestrian and cycling paths in order to promote active modes of transport;
Amendment 1238 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the connections of the airports to the other modes in the trans-European transport network, and particularly rail;
Amendment 1239 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point b – paragraph 1 for passenger airports, the total annual passenger traffic is at least 0.1% of the total annual passenger volume of all airports of the Union, unless the airport in question is situated outside a radius of
Amendment 1240 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point b – paragraph 1 for passenger airports, the total annual passenger traffic is at least 0.1% of the total annual passenger volume of all airports of the Union, unless the airport in question is situated outside a radius of 100 km from the nearest airport in the comprehensive network or outside a radius
Amendment 1241 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 2 – point b – paragraph 2 The total annual passenger volume and the total annual cargo volume are based on either the latest available three-year average, based on the statistics published by Eurostat or an estimate of infrastructure capacity about to become available.
Amendment 1242 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 32 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Each Outermost Region shall have at least one airport in the core network, if requested by the Member State after consulting the European Commission;
Amendment 1243 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the airports of the core network are connected with the long-distance rail network, including the high-speed rail network, and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network by 31 December 20
Amendment 1244 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the airports of the core network are connected with
Amendment 1245 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the airports of the core network are connected by railway, metro, light rail, trams, hydrogen or electric shuttle busses or vertiports with the long-distance rail network, including the high-speed rail network, and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network by 31 December 20
Amendment 1246 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the airports of the core network are connected with the long-distance rail network
Amendment 1247 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the airports of the core network are connected with the long-distance rail network, including the high-speed rail network, and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network by 31 December 2030
Amendment 1248 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the airports of the core network are connected
Amendment 1249 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the airports of the core network
Amendment 1250 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the airports of the core network are connected with the
Amendment 1251 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the airports of the core network with a total annual passenger traffic volume of more than four million passengers are connected with the long- distance rail network, including the high- speed rail network, and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network by 31 December 2030, except where specific geographic or significant physical constraints prevent such connections;
Amendment 1252 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the airports of the core network with a total annual passenger traffic volume of more than four million passengers are connected with the long- distance rail network, including the high- speed rail network, and road transport infrastructure of the trans-European transport network by 31 December 2030, except where specific geographic or significant physical constraints prevent such connections;
Amendment 1253 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the airports of the core network are connected with the long-distance rail network, including the high-speed rail network or any other suitable form of sustainable public transport, and road transport infrastructure of the trans- European transport network by 31 December 2030, except where specific geographic or significant physical constraints prevent such connections;
Amendment 1254 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b Amendment 1255 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the airports of the comprehensive network with a total annual passenger traffic volume of more than four million passengers are connected
Amendment 1256 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the airports of the comprehensive network with a total annual passenger traffic volume of more than four million passengers are connected with the
Amendment 1257 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the airports of the comprehensive network with a total annual passenger traffic volume of more than four million passengers are connected
Amendment 1258 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the airports of the comprehensive network with a total annual passenger traffic volume of more than four million passengers are connected with the long- distance railway network
Amendment 1259 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the airports of the comprehensive network with a total annual passenger traffic volume of more than four million passengers are connected with the long- distance railway network, including with the high-speed rail network, and road transport infrastructure of the trans- European transport network by 31 December 2050
Amendment 1260 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the airports of the comprehensive network with a total annual passenger traffic volume of more than four million passengers are connected with the
Amendment 1261 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the airports of the comprehensive network with a total annual passenger traffic volume of more than four million passengers are connected with the long- distance railway network or any other suitable form of sustainable public transport, including with the high-speed rail network, and road transport infrastructure of the trans-
Amendment 1262 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point g Amendment 1263 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point g Amendment 1264 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point g Amendment 1265 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) air transport infrastructure
Amendment 1266 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) air transport infrastructure managing bodies and suppliers of ground handling services provide
Amendment 1267 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) where the average annual air temperature is above 8 C, air transport infrastructure provides for pre-conditioned air supply to stationary aircraft.
Amendment 1268 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) where the average annual air temperature is above 8 C, air transport infrastructure provides for pre-conditioned air supply to stationary aircraft.
Amendment 1269 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 2 2. At the request of a Member State, the Commission may, in duly justified cases, grant exemptions by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements set out in paragraph 1, points (a), (b), (c) and (g), provided those are not detrimental to the modal shift to rail objective (and related targets under the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy). Any request for exemption shall be based on a soci
Amendment 1270 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 33 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. Member States shall ensure prioritisation for infrastructure projects on their territory related to airports: (a) as regards paragraph 1 point (a) and (b), for railway connections that become a link in the overall railway network, and where the airport is not an isolated destination; (b) for improving multimodal interconnections between airports and sustainable infrastructure of other transport modes, in particular rail but including also public transport; (c) for improving sustainability and mitigating climate, environmental and noise impacts, in particular by introducing new technologies and innovation, alternative fuels, zero- and low emission aircraft and zero and low carbon infrastructure;
Amendment 1271 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph -1 (new) -1 There shall be no projects of common interest related to air transport infrastructure.
Amendment 1272 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 Amendment 1273 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) improving sustainability and mitigating climate, environmental and noise impacts, in particular by introducing new technologies and innovation, alternative fuels, zero- and low emission aircraft and zero and low carbon infrastructure in accordance with Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] and Regulation (EU) […] [on ensuring a level playing field for sustainable air transport].
Amendment 1274 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter III – Section 6 – title Amendment 1275 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter III – Section 6 – title Amendment 1276 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – title Identification of the multimodal freight
Amendment 1277 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – title Identification of the multimodal freight
Amendment 1278 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The multimodal freight
Amendment 1279 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. The multimodal freight terminals hubs of the trans-European transport network are - among others - composed of terminals that are:
Amendment 1280 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) located in the maritime ports of the
Amendment 1281 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) located in the inland ports of the trans-European transport network, as listed in Annex II, or its vicinity provided they are connected by rail;
Amendment 1282 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure that there is sufficient multimodal freight
Amendment 1283 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Within two years after the entry into force of this Regulation, Member States shall conduct a market and prospective analysis on multimodal freight
Amendment 1284 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a (a) examine the current and the future traffic flows of freight, including traffic flows of freight transported by road, rail and water;
Amendment 1285 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) identify the existing multimodal freight
Amendment 1286 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) analyse how to ensure adequate distribution of multimodal freight
Amendment 1287 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall consult all relevant public and private actors, including but not limited to port authorities, shippers, transport and logistics operators which operate on their territory, and local or regional administrative authorities. They shall take into account the results of the consultation in their analysis.
Amendment 1288 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall consult local and regional authorities of urban nodes, port managing bodies, shippers, transport and logistics operators which operate on their territory. They shall take into account the results of the consultation in their analysis.
Amendment 1289 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall consult local and regional authorities of urban nodes, shippers, transport and logistics operators which operate on their territory. They shall take into account the results of the consultation in their analysis.
Amendment 1290 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall consult shippers, transport and logistics operators which operate on their territory, including rail infrastructure managers and port authorities. They shall take into account the results of the consultation in their analysis.
Amendment 1291 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall consult shippers, transport and logistics operators which operate on their territory as well as relevant authorities. They shall take into account the results of the consultation in their analysis.
Amendment 1292 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall consult shippers, port managing bodies, transport and logistics operators which operate on their territory. They shall take into account the results of the consultation in their analysis.
Amendment 1293 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall consult shippers, port managing bodies, transport and logistics operators which operate on their territory. They shall take into account the results of the consultation in their analysis.
Amendment 1294 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall consult shippers, port authorities, transport and logistics operators which operate on their territory. They shall take into account the results of the consultation in their analysis.
Amendment 1295 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Member States shall consult shippers, port authorities, transport and logistics operators which operate on their territory. They shall take into account the results of the consultation in their analysis.
Amendment 1296 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 4 4. On the basis of the analysis under paragraph 3, Member States shall elaborate an action plan for the development of a multimodal freight
Amendment 1297 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 5 – introductory part 5. A rail road
Amendment 1298 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 5 – point b (b) it is the main rail road
Amendment 1299 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – introductory part Multimodal freight
Amendment 1300 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 36 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) equipment such as cranes, conveyors or other transhipment devices to move freight between different transport modes or different systems and for the positioning and storage of freight;
Amendment 1301 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure in a fair and non-discriminatory manner that multimodal freight
Amendment 1302 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) are connected to the rail network, and any other modes of transport which are available in the area
Amendment 1303 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) after assessment and identification of the specific suitability for new technical features, identified and available Terminals are equipped with at least one recharging station as defined in Article 2, point (43), of Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] dedicated to serve heavy- duty vehicles, by 31 December 2030;
Amendment 1304 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) after assessment and identification of the specific suitability for new technical features, identified and available terminals are equipped with at least one recharging station as defined in Article 2, point (43), of Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] dedicated to serve heavy- duty vehicles, by 31 December 2030;
Amendment 1305 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) are equipped with at least one refuelling station as defined in Article 2, point (52), of Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] dedicated to serve heavy- duty vehicles, by 31 December 2030;
Amendment 1306 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i Amendment 1307 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii (ii) the provision of information flows within a terminal and between the transport modes along the logistic chain and the terminal operator.
Amendment 1308 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure in a fair and non-discriminatory manner that multimodal freight
Amendment 1309 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 2 2. Member States shall ensure in a fair and non-discriminatory manner that multimodal freight
Amendment 1310 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure in a fair and non-discriminatory manner that multimodal freight terminals referred to in Article 35(1) and which are connected to the rail network, by 31 December 2040, are able to accommodate 740 m long trains without manipulation or, if this is not economically viable or not feasible due to spatial restrictions, that adequate measures are taken to improve the operational efficiency of accommodating 740 m long trains, such as extension and electrification of departure and arrival sidings, adjustments to signalling systems and improvements to the track configuration.
Amendment 1311 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 4 4. Member States shall ensure in a fair and non-discriminatory manner that all multimodal freight terminals referred to in Article 35(1) and which are connected to the rail network, by 31 December 2050 are able to handle any 740 m long train without manipulation, unless the terminal is located in a spatially restricted area.
Amendment 1312 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. Member States shall ensure that multimodal hub design, planning, building and upgrading is carried out according to the highest standards of environmental protection, with the most sustainable and resilient materials available, and with the lowest feasible greenhouse gas emission output according to a lifecycle analysis.
Amendment 1313 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 5 5. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions from the obligations under paragraphs 1 to 4 may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts where investment in infrastructure cannot be justified in socio- economic cost-benefit terms, in particular when the terminal is located in a spatially restricted area, among other things at an urban node.
Amendment 1314 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 5 5. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions from the obligations under paragraphs 1 to 4 may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts where investment in infrastructure cannot be justified in socio- economic cost-benefit terms, in particular when the terminal is located in a spatially
Amendment 1315 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 5 5. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions from the obligations under paragraphs 1 to 4 may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts where investment in infrastructure cannot be justified in socio- economic cost-benefit terms, in particular when the terminal is located in a spatially restricted area, among other relevant factors.
Amendment 1316 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 37 – paragraph 5 5. At the request of a Member State, in duly justified cases, exemptions from the obligations under paragraphs 1 to 4 may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts where investment in infrastructure cannot be justified in socio-
Amendment 1317 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) facilitating interconnections between rail and different transport modes;
Amendment 1318 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) developing a smooth flow of information enabling transport services across the trans-European transport system, making use of satellite technologies also;
Amendment 1319 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) facilitating the interoperability for voluntary data sharing, access to data and data re-use within and between the transport modes;
Amendment 1320 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 38 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (ea) promoting multimodal transport infrastructure that facilitates an effective modal shift towards sustainable transport modes.
Amendment 1321 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) access points to the trans-European transport network, notably multimodal railway stations, multimodal freight
Amendment 1322 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) first and last mile connections between and to these access points, with a particular focus on zero emissions and as such including active mobility, light rail and other public transport infrastructure.
Amendment 1323 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) first and last mile connections between and to these access points, particularly including local and regional collective passenger modes.
Amendment 1324 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 2. The potential urban nodes of the trans-
Amendment 1325 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 39 – paragraph 2 2. The potential urban nodes of the trans-
Amendment 1326 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) availability of alternative fuels recharging and refuelling infrastructure, including in logistics platforms
Amendment 1327 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – introductory part (b) by 31 December 202
Amendment 1328 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) adoption of a sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP) in
Amendment 1329 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) adoption and publication of a sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP), in line with Annex V that and includes notably measures to integrate the different modes of transport, to promote efficient zero-emission mobility including sustainable and zero-emission urban logistics with the definition, among others, of minimum targets for charging infrastructure development involving electricity transmission and distribution system operators, to reduce air and noise pollution and that takes long
Amendment 1330 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) adoption of a sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP) in line with Annex V that includes notably measures to integrate the different modes of transport
Amendment 1331 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) adoption of a sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP) in line with Annex V that includes notably measures to integrate the different modes of transport, including active modes, to promote efficient zero-emission mobility including sustainable and zero-emission urban logistics and public transport, to promote affordability and accessibility to all users and address mobility poverty, to reduce air and noise pollution and that takes long- distance trans-European transport flows into consideration;
Amendment 1332 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) adoption of a sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP) in line with Annex V that includes notably measures to integrate the different modes of transport, to promote efficient zero-emission mobility
Amendment 1333 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) adoption of a sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP) in line with Annex V that includes notably measures to integrate the different modes of transport, to promote efficient zero-emission mobility including public transport and sustainable and zero-emission urban logistics, to reduce air and noise pollution and that takes long-distance trans-European transport flows into consideration;
Amendment 1334 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) collection and submission to the Commission of urban mobility data per urban node covering at minimum greenhouse gas emissions in total and for the different transport modes, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access
Amendment 1335 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) collection and submission to the Commission of urban mobility data per urban node covering at minimum greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access
Amendment 1336 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii a (new) (iia) adequate safeguards are established for the sharing of data held by commercial entities with other entities including public sector bodies in urban nodes, under obligations arising from Union or national law, respecting legitimate interests of commercial entities. Data sharing arrangements will include stating the legal basis for data collection, the scope of data sharing obligations, and the intended use of data, as well as prohibiting further data sharing with third parties beyond the intended use of the data and without the commercial entity's explicit consent. Trade secrets will only be disclosed to the extent necessary to fulfil the purpose of the data sharing obligation.
Amendment 1337 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii a (new) (iia) the adoption of concrete measures, such as the deployment of ICT tools and ITS systems and the collection of other relevant data, to allow optimised itineraries for vehicles with a view to improving the management of traffic flows, reducing congestion and air pollution and improving road safety.
Amendment 1338 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii a (new) (iia) if no SUMP has been adopted by December 2025, the concerned urban nodes shall not be eligible for funding to implement the Trans-European Transport network, especially through the Connecting Europe Facility.
Amendment 1339 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii b (new) (iib) The adoption of SUMPs by urban nodes shall consider measures such as the wider deployment of information and communications technology (ICT) tools and intelligent transport systems (ITS) to allow optimised itineraries for commercial vehicles, priority at traffic lights and real- time information on alternative fuels infrastructure availability.
Amendment 1340 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i (i) for passenger transport: sustainable, seamless, safe, accessible and
Amendment 1341 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i (i) for passenger transport: sustainable, seamless and safe interconnection between rail, road, air, the active modes of transport, including where possible EuroVelo infrastructure, and, as appropriate, inland waterway and maritime infrastructure;
Amendment 1342 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i (i) for passenger transport: sustainable, seamless and safe interconnection between local public transport, rail, road, air, the active modes of transport and, as appropriate, inland waterway and
Amendment 1343 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii Amendment 1344 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii (ii) for passenger transport: ability for passengers to access information, book, pay their journeys and retrieve their tickets through multimodal digital mobility services, facilitating single ticketing where possible if different operators are involved;
Amendment 1345 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii (iii) for freight transport: sustainable, seamless and safe interconnection between rail, road, and, as appropriate, inland waterway, air and maritime infrastructure as well as appropriate connections with logistics platforms
Amendment 1346 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iv (iv) the development of multimodal passenger hubs allowing the exchange at least between rail, public transport and active modes, to facilitate first and last mile connections which are equipped with at least one recharging station as defined in Article 2, point (43), of Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] dedicated to serve heavy- duty vehicles, with dedicated safe and accessible bicycle parking spaces and sufficient infrastructure, including charging infrastructure, for active mobility and electric micromobility modes to contribute or comprise the first and last mile connections;
Amendment 1347 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iv a (new) (iva) mitigation of the exposure of urban areas to negative effects of transiting road transport, which may include bypasses, lowering of speed limits, decreased access to urban areas for automotive vehicles, and other actions to decrease the amount of automotive vehicles within urban nodes. Such measures should be targeted to the worst affected areas;
Amendment 1348 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iv b (new) (ivb) 100% of trip origins and destinations within the urban node to be safely reachable by walking and cycling;
Amendment 1349 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d Amendment 1350 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) by 31 December 20
Amendment 1351 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) by 31 December 2040: the development of at least one multimodal freight terminal allowing for sufficient transhipment capacity within or in the vicinity of the urban node taking into account urban logistics and last mile and access routes connections. One multimodal freight terminal may serve several urban nodes if capacity allows and be located in the urban node itself or in its vicinity.
Amendment 1352 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) by 31 December 2040: the development of at least one multimodal freight terminal allowing for sufficient transhipment capacity within or in the vicinity of the urban node. However, if a terminal has sufficient capacity then it shall be possible for it to serve more than one urban node.
Amendment 1353 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) by 31 December 2040: the development, where economically viable, of at least one multimodal freight terminal allowing for sufficient transhipment capacity within or in the vicinity of the urban node. One multimodal freight terminal may serve more than one urban node.
Amendment 1354 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) by 31 December 2040: the development, where economically viable, of at least one multimodal freight terminal allowing for sufficient transhipment capacity within or in the vicinity of the urban node, subject to the derogation referred to in Article 37(5).
Amendment 1355 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) by 31 December 2040: the development of at least one multimodal freight
Amendment 1356 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) by 31 December 2040: the development of at least one multimodal freight terminal allowing for sufficient
Amendment 1357 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) by 31 December 2040: the development of at least one multimodal freight terminal allowing for sufficient transhipment capacity to ensure urban logistics and the last mile within or in the vicinity of the urban node.
Amendment 1358 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 a (new) From 1 January 2026, EU funding for projects of common interest related to urban nodes should be made conditional to the adoption of SUMPs in accordance with the requirements set out in Annex V.
Amendment 1359 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 a (new) sufficient EU funds to improve and strengthen the role of urban nodes as indispensable hub within the TEN- Network
Amendment 1360 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 2 The Commission shall in close cooperation with Member States and their regional and local authorities adopt, no later than one year after the entry into force of this Regulation an implementing act establishing a methodology for the data to be collected by the Member States referred to under point (ii) of paragraph (b). When doing so, the availability and accessibility of data at local level as well as existing local and regional urban mobility plans shall be taken into consideration. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 59(3).
Amendment 1361 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 2 a (new) The Commission shall present, before 2030, a thorough analysis of the minimal requirements for modal shares to ensure climate neutral transport within, to and from urban nodes. The Commission may, as a result of such an analysis, adopt an implementing act within a year of the publishing of this analysis to include more ambitious requirements than laid down in paragraph (d) point (ii) to (iv) for 2035.
Amendment 1362 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 2 b (new) The Commission shall consequently adopt, before 2035, an implementing act establishing additional minimum requirements for 1 January 2050 in terms of modal shares of light- and heavy-duty vehicles (except vehicles used for public transport), public transport and active mobility within, to and from the urban nodes, corresponding to the minimum requirements possible for achieving climate neutral transportation within, to and from urban nodes by 2050.
Amendment 1363 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) seamless interconnection between the infrastructure of the trans-European transport network, in particular rail, and the infrastructure for regional and local transport;
Amendment 1364 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) promotion of efficient
Amendment 1365 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) upgrading or increasing the capacity of public transport infrastructure, including light rail or metro, which may connect to another urban node should the urban nodes share a commuting zone;
Amendment 1366 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) deploying bicycle and electric micromobility sharing systems, paying particular attention to the adequate access and availability in vulnerable areas;
Amendment 1367 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) increase of accessibility and connectivity between urban and rural areas and unhindered access to smart, sustainable and affordable transport;
Amendment 1368 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 41 a (new) Article 41 a Safety standards for cycling and active modes infrastructures By 31 December 2025 at the latest, the Commission shall present implementing acts with harmonised safety standards for cycling transport infrastructure, and for pedestrian transport infrastructure.
Amendment 1369 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter III – Section 7 a (new) SECTION 8: CYCLING AND ACTIVE MODES INFRASTRUCTURE Article 41a - Infrastructure components Cycling transport infrastructure shall comprise the infrastructure that is part of the EuroVelo network as set out in Annex [x] of this Regulation: (a) cycle tracks or lanes alongside public roads; (b) public roads with low volumes and speeds of motorised traffic; (c) non-public roads with unrestricted access for cycling; (d) dedicated cycling tracks and greenways; (e) cycling bridges and tunnels. Article 41b - Infrastructure requirements Member States shall ensure that: (a) the cycling infrastructure is safe, direct, coherent, attractive, and comfortable; (b) a system is in place for the surveillance, regular inspection, and maintenance of cycling infrastructure; (c) a dedicated budget exists for maintenance and improvements to the cycling infrastructure. Article 41c - Additional priorities for cycling infrastructure In the promotion of projects of common interest related to active modes infrastructures, and in addition to the general priorities set out in Articles 12 and 13, attention shall be given to the following: (a) improving and further building dedicated cycling and pedestrian infrastructure around urban nodes; (b) providing for dedicated cycle tracks in sections where cyclists currently share the carriageway with high speed, and/or high volumes of, motorised traffic (c) providing for separated cycling and pedestrian paths where cyclists and pedestrians currently share the carriageway; (d) improving sections of the cycle and pedestrian infrastructure that do not have adequate surface quality; (e) interconnection of rail infrastructure and active modes infrastructure.
Amendment 1370 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 1. ICT systems for transport shall be such as to enable capacity and traffic management and the exchange of information, where economically and technically feasible, within and between transport modes for multimodal transport operations and value-added transport- related services, improvements in resilience, safety, security, congestion and operational and environmental performance, and simplified administrative procedures.
Amendment 1371 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 1. ICT systems for transport shall be such as to enable capacity and traffic management and the exchange of information, where economically and technically feasible, within and between transport modes for multimodal transport operations and value-added transport- related services, improvements in resilience, safety, security, congestion and operational and environmental performance, and simplified administrative procedures. ICT systems for transport shall also facilitate seamless connection between infrastructure and
Amendment 1372 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 1 1. ICT systems for transport shall be such as to enable capacity and traffic management and the exchange of information within and between transport modes for multimodal transport operations and value-added transport-related services, improvements in resilience, safety, security, congestion, emissions and operational and environmental performance, and simplified administrative procedures. ICT systems for transport shall also facilitate seamless connection between infrastructure and mobile assets.
Amendment 1373 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 42 – paragraph 3 – point f (f) for multimodal transport: eFTI, the EU Mobility Data Space and frameworks facilitating voluntary business to business data exchange for supply chain transparency and optimisation.
Amendment 1374 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall promote projects of common interest which both provide efficient freight transport services that use the infrastructure of the trans- European transport network and contribute to reducing
Amendment 1375 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall promote projects of common interest which both provide efficient freight transport services that use the infrastructure of the trans- European transport network and contribute to reducing carbon dioxide emissions and other negative environmental impacts, such as air and noise pollution, and which aim to:
Amendment 1376 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) promote the deployment of innovative transport services, including short-sea shipping links, network technologies such as hyperloop, ICT systems for transport and the development of the ancillary infrastructure necessary to achieve mainly environmental and safety- related goals of those services, as well as the establishment of relevant governance structures;
Amendment 1377 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 43 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) improve links to the most vulnerable and isolated parts of the Union, in particular the outermost regions, and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas promoting regular and frequent services.
Amendment 1378 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) support and promote the decarbonisation of transport
Amendment 1379 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) support and promote the decarbonisation of transport through transition to zero- and low-emission vehicles, vessels and aircraft and other innovative and sustainable transport and network technologies
Amendment 1380 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) support and promote the decarbonisation of transport through transition to zero- and low-emission vehicles, vessels and aircraft and other innovative and sustainable transport and network technologies
Amendment 1381 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) support and promote the decarbonisation of transport through transition to zero- and low-emission vehicles, vessels, rolling stock and aircraft and other innovative and sustainable transport and network technologies such as hyperloop;
Amendment 1382 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) support and promote the decarbonisation of transport through transition to zero- and low-emission vehicles, vessels, rolling stock and aircraft and other innovative and sustainable transport and network technologies such as hyperloop;
Amendment 1383 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) ensure suitable conditions for emerging technologies such as automated train services, autonomous vehicles and passenger and freight drones and promote their wider use so as to maintain the EU’s leading position in the field and encourage private and public infrastructural investment in new mobility options, such as urban last mile drones, elevated cycle paths, maglev trains and the Hyperloop, while preserving and promoting the principle of technological neutrality;
Amendment 1384 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) encourage research and development of green and innovative mobility alternatives, such as "Mobility as a Service" solutions in territories where exceptions of TEN-T technical requirements have been granted.
Amendment 1385 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) encourage research and development of green and innovative alternatives in territories exempted from TEN-T technical measures, such as islands and outermost regions;
Amendment 1386 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) encourage research and development of green and innovative alternatives in territories exempted from TEN-t technical measures, such as islands and outermost regions;
Amendment 1387 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) make possible the decarbonisation of all transport modes by stimulating energy efficiency, introduce zero
Amendment 1388 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) make possible the decarbonisation of all transport modes by stimulating energy efficiency, introduce zero and low emission solutions, including hydrogen and electricity supply systems, as well as other new solutions such as sustainable fuels, and provide corresponding infrastructure. Such infrastructure may include grid access, pipelines and other facilities necessary for the energy supply, may take account of the
Amendment 1389 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) make possible the decarbonisation of all transport modes by stimulating energy efficiency, introduce zero and low emission solutions, including hydrogen and electricity supply systems, as well as other new solutions such as sustainable fuels, and provide corresponding infrastructure. Such infrastructure may include grid access and other facilities necessary for the energy supply, may take account of the infrastructure-vehicle interface and may encompass ICT systems for transport. Transport infrastructure may serve as energy hub to serve different transport modes, in order to connect local production of clean energy with zero and low emission mobility applications. Transport infrastructure may also contribute to the deployment of other technologies accelerating the decarbonisation of the economy.;
Amendment 1390 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) make possible the decarbonisation of all transport modes by stimulating energy efficiency, introduce zero and low emission solutions, including hydrogen and electricity supply systems, as well as other new solutions such as sustainable fuels, and provide corresponding infrastructure. Such infrastructure may include grid access and other facilities necessary for the energy supply, may take account of the infrastructure-vehicle interface and may encompass ICT systems for transport. Transport infrastructure may serve as energy hub to serve different transport modes; in order to connect local production of clean energy with zero emission mobility applications. Transport infrastructure may also contribute to the deployment of other technologies accelerating the decarbonisation of the economy.
Amendment 1391 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) make possible the decarbonisation of all transport modes by stimulating energy efficiency, introduce zero and low emission solutions, including hydrogen and electricity supply systems, as well as other new solutions such as sustainable fuels, and provide corresponding infrastructure. Such infrastructure may include grid access, wireless or inductive units without any connector and other facilities necessary for the energy supply, may take account of the infrastructure-vehicle interface and may encompass ICT systems for transport. Transport infrastructure may serve as energy hub to serve different transport modes;
Amendment 1392 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) make possible the decarbonisation of all transport modes by stimulating energy efficiency, introduce zero and low emission solutions, including hydrogen, biofuels and electricity supply systems, as well as other new solutions such as sustainable fuels, and provide corresponding infrastructure. Such infrastructure may include grid access and other facilities necessary for the energy supply, may take account of the infrastructure-vehicle interface and may encompass ICT systems for transport.
Amendment 1393 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) support the take-up and deployment of new digital technologies, in particular promote connectivity infrastructure with uninterrupted coverage across the European Transport Corridors to ensure the highest level and performance of digital infrastructure and reach higher levels of automation particularly in the rail sector;
Amendment 1394 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) improve the operation, management, accessibility, interoperability, multimodality and efficiency of the network, including through the development of multimodal digital
Amendment 1395 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) improve the operation, management, accessibility, interoperability, multimodality and efficiency of the network, including through the development of multimodal digital mobility services and the development of infrastructure that allows for seamless multimodality, such as high-speed rail and a night train network, and city train/tram connection at airports;
Amendment 1396 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) improve the operation, management, accessibility, interoperability, multimodality and efficiency of the network, including through the development of multimodal digital mobility services and the development of infrastructure that allows for seamless multimodality, such as high-speed rail and
Amendment 1397 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) improve the operation, management, accessibility, interoperability, multimodality and efficiency of the network, including through the development of multimodal digital mobility services and the development of infrastructure that allows for seamless multimodality, such as high-speed rail
Amendment 1398 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) promote efficient ways to provide accessible and comprehensible information to all users and providers of transport services regarding interconnections, interoperability and multimodality and regarding the environmental impacts of their transport choices;
Amendment 1399 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) promote efficient ways to provide accessible and comprehensive information to all users and providers of transport services regarding the environmental impacts of their transport choices, particularly regarding the greenhouse gas emissions per mode;
Amendment 1400 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point h (h) promote measures to internalise and reduce external costs, such as congestion, damage to health and pollution of any kind including air, noise and greenhouse gas emissions;
Amendment 1401 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point k (k) further advance the development
Amendment 1402 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point k a (new) (ka) Encourage research and development of green and innovative alternatives in territories exempt from TEN-T technical measures, such as islands and outermost regions;
Amendment 1403 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 a (new) Member States should, when relevant, coordinate the implementation of the innovative technological developments and deployments included in paragraph (1) with neighbouring countries, particularly in cross-border sections.
Amendment 1404 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – title Amendment 1405 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that transport infrastructure provides for safe and secure passenger and freight movements, with a particular focus on the rights of transport workers and the protection of vulnerable infrastructure users, as well as the full accessibility of persons with disabilities or reduced mobility.
Amendment 1406 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that transport infrastructure provides for safe and secure passenger and freight movements, including by guaranteeing an adequate level of maintenance over the life-time of the transport infrastructure.
Amendment 1407 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. When planning infrastructure, Member States shall improve the security and the resilience of the transport infrastructure to climate change, natural hazards, human-made disasters, as well as intentional disruptions, including by natural persons or undertakings from third countries, affecting the functioning of the Union transport system. When implementing projects o
Amendment 1408 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. When planning infrastructure, Member States shall improve the security and the resilience of the transport infrastructure to climate change, natural hazards, human-made disasters, as well as intentional disruptions, including by natural persons or undertakings from third countries, affecting the functioning of the Union transport system. When implementing projects of common interest, Member States shall take into consideration:
Amendment 1409 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) cyber-security and resilience of infrastructure, with particular attention to the participation or contribution by natural persons or undertaking from third countries in strategic as well as cross- border infrastructure.
Amendment 1410 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 2 2. Projects of common interest for which an environmental impact assessment must be carried out in compliance with Directive 2011/92/UE
Amendment 1411 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. By 2025, Members States shall carry out an assessment to identify, on their core and comprehensive network, all existing transport critical infrastructures, including in respect of all modes, and assess their resilience to climate change, through a climate and environmental vulnerability test and risk assessment. By 2030, Member States shall adopt all the adaptation measures required to update those infrastructures.
Amendment 1412 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall notify the Commission of any project o
Amendment 1413 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall notify the Commission of any project of common interest in their territory with the participation of or contribution of any kind by a natural person of a third country or an undertaking of a third country with a view to allow assessment of its impact on security or public order in the Union and ensure fair competition in public procurement. This obligation shall not apply to foreign direct investments notified to the Commission and other Member States pursuant to Article 6(1) of Regulation (EU) 2019/452.
Amendment 1414 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall ensure that the information notified pursuant to paragraph 1 is made available at least twelve months
Amendment 1415 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) the approximate value of the participation of or contribution by a natural person of a third country or an undertaking of a third country in the project o
Amendment 1416 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 In addition, Member States shall
Amendment 1417 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 No later than thirty calendar days following the receipt of information pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission may request additional information from the Member State where the project o
Amendment 1418 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The Member State where the project o
Amendment 1419 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 The Member State where the project of common interest is planned shall ensure that the additional information requested by the Commission is made available to the Commission
Amendment 1420 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 The Member State where the project o
Amendment 1421 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 3 The Member State where the project of common interest is planned may request the natural person of a third country or an undertaking of a third country to provide the information referred to in paragraph 2 and 3. The natural person of a third country or an undertaking of a third country concerned shall provide the information requested
Amendment 1422 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where the Commission considers that the participation of or contribution of any kind by a natural person of a third country or an undertaking of a third country is likely to affect critical infrastructure on the trans- European transport network on grounds of security or public order, or has relevant information in relation to that participation or contribution, or the project o
Amendment 1423 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 Where the Commission considers that the participation of or contribution of any kind by a natural person of a third country or an undertaking of a third country is likely to affect critical infrastructure on the trans- European transport network on grounds of security or public order, or has relevant information in relation to that participation or contribution, or the project o
Amendment 1424 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part In determining whether the participation of a natural person of a third country or an undertaking of a third country is likely to affect critical infrastructure on grounds of security or public order, the Commission
Amendment 1425 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part In determining whether a foreign participation or contribution is likely to affect security or public order, the Commission
Amendment 1426 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission
Amendment 1427 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 6 6. The Commission
Amendment 1428 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Other Member States concerned by the project of common interest may also provide their remarks in the form of an opinion, no later than one month following the receipt of information.
Amendment 1429 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 7 7. The Member State in which the project o
Amendment 1430 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 7 7. The Member State in which the project of common interest is planned to be implemented by, or with the participation of or contribution of any kind by a natural person of a third country or an undertaking of a third country shall take utmost account of the Commission's opinion and provide an explanation to the Commission if its opinion is not followed, and duly responding to the concerns raised in opinions by any other Member State concerned pursuant to paragraph 6a, no later than three months following the issuance of the opinion
Amendment 1431 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 12 12. Any processing of personal data pursuant to this Article shall be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/67973 and Regulation (EU) 2018/172574 and only in so far as it is necessary for the screening of the participation in, or contribution to, the relevant project o
Amendment 1432 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the infrastructure of the trans- European transport network is maintained in a way that it provides the same level of service and safety during its lifetime; and that maintenance works that result in a limitation or non-availability of rail infrastructure are managed according to the rules stated in Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/2075.
Amendment 1433 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the infrastructure of the trans- European transport network is maintained in a way that it provides the same level of service and safety during its lifetime
Amendment 1434 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the infrastructure of the trans- European transport network is maintained in a way that it provides the same level of service and safety during its lifetime and that maintenance works are conducted in compliance with Commission Delegated Decision (EU)2017/2075;
Amendment 1435 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the infrastructure of the trans- European transport network is maintained in a way that it provides the same level of service and safety during its lifetime, ensuring a forward-looking approach to maintenance work, which must be carried out to the very latest standards of user safety throughout the network;
Amendment 1436 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) the infrastructure of the trans- European transport network is maintained in a way that it provides
Amendment 1437 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) maintenance needs and costs over the life-time of the infrastructure are taken into account
Amendment 1438 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) maintenance works that result in a limitation or non-availability of rail infrastructure are managed according to the rules stated in Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/2075;
Amendment 1439 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) compliance of Member States with the propositions (a) to (d) of this article shall be a precondition for receiving funds from the Connecting Europe Facility on their territory, excluding cross-border projects.
Amendment 1440 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (da) Compliance of Member States with the propositions (a) to (d) of this article shall be the precondition for receiving funds from the emissions Trading System (ETS) for projects on their territory.
Amendment 1441 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 a (new) The Commission, in coordination with the European Coordinators, shall establish a core network monitoring plan on maintenance at European level. This monitoring plan should, among others, evaluate the compliance of Member States with the requirements set in paragraph (1), study the state of play of the maintenance of the network and identify gaps in the quality requirements of infrastructure, especially in critical infrastructure. The Commission shall provide Member States with recommendations on targeted measures to improve the maintenance of the network. The Commission shall also present progress reports every two years.
Amendment 1442 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 a (new) Compliance with paragraph 1, points (b) and (c) is a precondition for receiving funding from the CEF.
Amendment 1443 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 Amendment 1444 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 Transport infrastructure, including services connected to it, shall allow seamless mobility and accessibility for all users, in particular
Amendment 1445 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 Transport infrastructure, including services connected to it, shall allow seamless mobility and accessibility for all users, in particular people in situations of vulnerability including persons with disabilities or reduced mobility as well as persons living in outermost regions and other remote, rural, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas.
Amendment 1446 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 a (new) Amendment 1447 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 b (new) The design, construction, maintenance, and upgrade of transport infrastructure, including services connected to it, shall comply with Annex I and Annex III of Directive (EU) 2019/882, and accessibility requirements laid down in other relevant Union law.
Amendment 1448 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 c (new) Without prejudice to the Connecting Europe Facility, InvestEU, the Recovery and Resilience Facility, Cohesion Policy, European Regional Development Fund, Horizon Europe and other financing instruments established under Union law or by the European Investment Bank, as well as relevant provisions of this Regulation, Member States shall ensure that public investments for the development, maintenance and upgrading of TEN-T infrastructure, including connected services, are not used to create further access barriers for passengers or otherwise contradict the requirements set out in paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of this Article.
Amendment 1449 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 1 1. European Transport Corridors are an instrument to facilitate the coordinated implementation of the parts of the core and extended core of the trans-
Amendment 1450 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) modal integration with a particular view to strengthen the most environmentally friendly transport modes, notably zero emission local public transport, rail, inland waterways and short-
Amendment 1451 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) modal integration with a particular view to strengthen the most environmentally friendly transport modes, notably rail, inland waterways and short- sea shipping and hyperloop;
Amendment 1452 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) interoperability and continuity of the network;
Amendment 1453 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point b (b)
Amendment 1454 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point b a (new) (ba) supporting improvement of the accessibility of the network for all passengers;
Amendment 1455 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) a coordinated development of infrastructure, in particular in cross-border sections, notably in view of developing a fully interoperable rail freight system
Amendment 1456 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) a coordinated development of infrastructure, in particular in cross-border sections, notably in view of developing a fully interoperable rail freight system as well as a long-distance rail passenger network at high speed across the Union, in combination with night trains;
Amendment 1457 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) a coordinated development of infrastructure, in particular in cross-border sections, notably in view of developing a fully interoperable rail freight system as well as an accessible for all users long- distance rail passenger network at high speed across the Union;
Amendment 1458 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) a coordinated development of infrastructure, in particular in cross-border sections, notably in view of developing a fully interoperable rail freight system as
Amendment 1459 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point d (d) supporting the coordinated and integrated development and deployment of innovative solutions for the digitalisation and interoperability of transport.
Amendment 1460 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) supporting improvement of the accessibility of the corridors for all passengers.
Amendment 1461 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (da) promoting the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure.
Amendment 1462 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 4 4. The European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) and the European Maritime Space are the horizontal priorities for the implementation of the trans-European transport network. They shall ensure the timely deployment of ERTMS on the entire network and the integration of maritime links into the trans- European transport network. In addition, the Commission shall undertake to ensure the implementation of ERTMS policies in a bid to remedy its uneven development to date in the various Member States, not least because of the high costs and the lack of specific provisions ensuring an even financial burden on infrastructure managers and rail companies.
Amendment 1463 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 4 4. The European Rail Traffic
Amendment 1464 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 1 1. In order to facilitate the coordinated implementation of the European Transport Corridors, of ERTMS
Amendment 1465 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. When selecting candidates for a vacant position, the Commission shall pay particular attention to gender balance in the composition of the ensemble of the European Coordinators for the nine corridors and the two horizontal priorities.
Amendment 1466 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point b (b) draw up a work plan together with the Member States and regional and local authorities concerned and monitor its implementation in accordance with Article 53;
Amendment 1467 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point d (d) report to the Member States, to regional and local authorities and to the Commission and, as appropriate, to all other entities directly involved in the development of the European Transport Corridor or horizontal priority on any difficulties encountered and, in particular when the development of a corridor or horizontal priority is being impeded, with a view to helping to find appropriate solutions;
Amendment 1468 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point d (d) report, in due time, to the Member States, to the Commission, to the Parliament and, as appropriate, to all other entities directly involved in the development of the European Transport Corridor or horizontal priority on any difficulties encountered and, in particular when the development of a corridor or horizontal priority is being impeded, with a view to helping to find appropriate solutions;
Amendment 1469 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point e (e) draw up an annual status report on the progress achieved in implementing the European Transport Corridors and horizontal priorities. This annual status report shall be presented to the Parliament and shall focus on the progress made on key priorities and investments, describe the nature of problems encountered in their implementation and propose solutions.
Amendment 1470 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point e (e) draw up an annual status report on the progress achieved in implementing the European Transport Corridors and horizontal priorities. This annual status report shall focus on the progress made on key priorities and investments, describe the nature of problems encountered in their implementation and propose solutions that shall be binding in nature.
Amendment 1471 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point e – indent 1 (new) - conduct a feasibility study starting at the latest with entry into force of this regulation that in parallel to the roll out of ERTMS/ETCS transparently outlines the implementation paths to the deadlines set for 2030, 2040 and 2050. This study shall not only look into feasibility in terms of technology, but also in terms of resources and financial support/subsidies in order to prevent a negative business case for affected partners, especially Railway Undertakings.
Amendment 1472 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point e a (new) (ea) The ERTMS Coordinator shall conduct a feasibility study starting at the latest with entry into force of this regulation that in parallel to the roll out of ERTMS/ETCS transparently outlines the implementation paths to the deadlines set for 2030, 2040 and 2050. This study shall not only look into feasibility in terms of technology, but also in terms of resources and financial support/subsidies, and the Rail Supply Industry Readiness Level, in order to prevent a negative business case for affected actors, especially Railway Undertakings.
Amendment 1473 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point e a (new) (ea) The ERTMS Coordinator shall conduct a feasibility study starting at the latest with entry into force of this regulation that in parallel to the roll out of ERTMS/ETCS transparently outlines the implementation paths to the deadlines set for 2030, 2040 and 2050. This study shall not only look into feasibility in terms of technology, but also in terms of resources and financial support/subsidies, and the Rail Supply Industry Readiness Level, in order to prevent a negative business case for affected actors, especially Railway Undertakings.
Amendment 1474 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point e a (new) (ea) The ERTMS Coordinator shall conduct a feasibility study starting at the latest with entry into force of this regulation that in parallel to the roll out of ERTMS/ETCS transparently outlines the implementation paths to the deadlines set for 2030, 2040 and 2050. This study shall not only look into feasibility in terms of technology, but also in terms of resources and financial support/subsidies, and the Rail Supply Industry Readiness Level, in order to prevent a negative business case for affected actors, especially Railway Undertakings.
Amendment 1475 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point e a (new) (ea) The ERTMS Coordinator shall conduct a feasibility study starting at the latest with entry into force of this regulation that in parallel to the roll out of ERTMS/ETCS transparently outlines the implementation paths to the deadlines set for 2030, 2040 and 2050. This study shall not only look into feasibility in terms of technology, but also in terms of resources and financial support/subsidies, and the Rail Supply Industry Readiness Level, in order to prevent a negative business case for affected actors, especially Railway Undertakings.
Amendment 1476 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point e a (new) (ea) The ERTMS Coordinator shall conduct a feasibility study starting at the latest with entry into force of this regulation that in parallel to the roll out of ERTMS/ETCS transparently outlines the implementation paths to the deadlines set for 2030, 2040 and 2050. This study shall not only look into feasibility in terms of technology, but also in terms of resources and financial support/subsidies, and the Rail Supply Industry Readiness Level, in order to prevent a negative business case for affected actors, especially Railway Undertakings.
Amendment 1477 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point e a (new) (ea) conduct a feasibility study starting at the latest with entry into force of this regulation that in parallel to the roll out of ERTMS/ETCS transparently outlines the implementation paths to the deadlines set for 2030, 2040 and 2050.This study shall not only look into feasibility in terms of technology, but also in terms of resources and financial support/subsidies in order to prevent a negative business case for affected partners, especially Railway Undertakings.
Amendment 1478 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point e a (new) (ea) carry out and periodically update a transport market study relating to the observed and expected changes in the traffic on the freight corridor, covering the different types of traffic, both regarding the transport of freight and the transport of passengers;
Amendment 1479 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 5 – point e a (new) (ea) facilitate the establishment of a "joint authority" which may be established by mutual agreement between two or more Member States to facilitate the permit-granting procedures related to cross-border projects as set in the Smart TEN-T Directive.
Amendment 1480 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 6 – point a (a) cooperate closely with the rail freight governance to identify and prioritise investment needs for rail freight on the rail freight lines of the European Transport Corridors with the aim to develop a single integrated governance structure for the ETCs; ;
Amendment 1481 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 6 – point a (a) cooperate closely with the rail freight governance to identify and prioritise investment needs for rail freight on the rail freight lines of the European Transport Corridors with the aim to develop a single integrated governance structure for the ETCs;
Amendment 1482 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 6 – point b a (new) (ba) identify and prioritise the investment needs for rivers, canals and lakes referred to in Article 22.3 (a)
Amendment 1483 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 – point -a (new) (-a) identify capacity constraints and bottlenecks, as well as missing links, including regional infrastructures previously existing in disuse due to lack of maintenance or service, as well as the related potential upgrades thereof;
Amendment 1484 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 – point a (a)
Amendment 1485 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 – point a (a) identify and prioritise investment needs for the rail passenger lines of the European Transport Corridors, including for improving accessibility for all passengers;;
Amendment 1486 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 – point a (a) identify and prioritise investment needs for the rail passenger and fright lines of the European Transport Corridors;
Amendment 1487 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 – point a a (new) (aa) identify and prioritise investment needs for the inland waterways of the European Transport Corridors;
Amendment 1488 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 – point a b (new) (ab) identify and prioritise investment needs for the road sections of the European Transport Corridors;
Amendment 1489 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 – point b (b) monitor administrative, operational and interoperability aspects of passenger traffic on the rail passenger lines of the European Transport Corridors, including monitoring the accessibility and performance of rail passenger services, identifying shortcoming and constraints with a particular focus on the cross- border dimension.
Amendment 1490 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 – point b (b) monitor administrative, operational and interoperability aspects of passenger traffic on the rail passenger lines of the European Transport Corridors, including monitoring the performance and accessibility of rail passenger services.
Amendment 1491 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 – point b (b) monitor administrative, operational and interoperability aspects of passenger traffic on the rail passenger lines of the European Transport Corridors, including monitoring the accessibility and performance of rail passenger services.
Amendment 1492 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 – point b a (new) (ba) analyse the cross-border mobility needs in EU cross-border regions and encourage Member States, in cooperation with the relevant regional and local authorities, to jointly establish "cross- border mobility plans" with targeted measures in order to, among others, increase the network connectivity index, foster the coordination and frequency of rail and public transport services between regions, address missing links and bottlenecks, enhance the performance of passenger rail services and infrastructure and improve the affordability of the cross- border services.
Amendment 1493 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 – point b a (new) (ba) monitor the implementation of the National Policy Frameworks for alternative fuels infrastructure and cooperate with the national coordinators for alternative fuels infrastructure as defined in Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure].
Amendment 1494 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 7 a (new) 7a. cooperate with the regional authorities to identify and prioritise investment needs for the regional rail services on the rail lines of the European Transport Corridors;
Amendment 1495 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 8 8. Pursuant Article 14(4) of Regulation (EU) No 2021/1153, the Commission shall request the opinion of the European Coordinator when examining applications for Union funding under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and European Structural and Investment Funds (ESIF) for European Transport Corridors or horizontal priorities in the remit of the European Coordinator’s mandate, in order to ensure the consistency and advancement of each corridor or horizontal priority. The European Coordinator shall verify whether projects proposed by the Member States for CEF co-funding and for ESIF transport infrastructure projects are consistent with the priorities of the work plan.
Amendment 1496 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 8 8. Pursuant Article 14(4) of Regulation (EU) No 2021/1153, the Commission shall request the opinion of the European Coordinator when examining applications for Union funding under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) for European Transport Corridors or horizontal priorities in the remit of the European Coordinator’s mandate, in order to ensure the consistency and advancement of each corridor or horizontal priority and taking into account the need for convergence of the respective Rail connectivity indexes for each corridor. The European Coordinator shall verify whether projects proposed by the Member States for CEF co-funding are consistent with the priorities of the work plan.
Amendment 1497 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 51 – paragraph 9 9. If the European Coordinator is unable to carry out his or her mandate satisfactorily and in accordance with the requirements laid down in this Article, the Commission, upon consultation with the Parliament, may at any time terminate that mandate and designate a new European Coordinator in accordance with the procedure set out in paragraph 1.
Amendment 1498 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The “Corridor Forum” shall be formally established and chaired by the European Coordinator. The Member States concerned shall agree on the membership of the Corridor Forum for their part of the European Transport Corridor and ensure representation of the rail freight governance, as well as of concerned maritime ports, and representation of relevant local and regional authorities. Participation shall be mandatory for all relevant experts.
Amendment 1499 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The
Amendment 1500 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The “Corridor Forum” shall be formally established and chaired by the European Coordinator. The organization of the "Corridor Forum" shall reflect its new role and tasks. The Member States concerned shall agree on the membership of the Corridor Forum for their part of the European Transport Corridor and ensure representation of the rail freight governance.
Amendment 1501 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The “Corridor Forum” shall be formally established and chaired by the European Coordinator. The Member States concerned shall agree on the membership of the Corridor Forum for their part of the
Amendment 1502 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The
Amendment 1503 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The “Corridor Forum” shall be
Amendment 1504 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 2 2. The “Corridor Forum” shall be formally established and chaired by the European Coordinator. The Member States concerned shall agree on the membership of the Corridor Forum for their part of the European Transport Corridor and ensure representation of the rail freight governance as well as regional authorities and urban TEN-t nodes.
Amendment 1505 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part With the agreement of the Member States concerned, the European Coordinator may set up and chair corridor working groups, that may include representatives of specialised stakeholders, such as consumer organisations, environmental NGOs or unions, and which focus on:
Amendment 1506 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new) (aa) supporting the timely implementation of the priority projects;
Amendment 1507 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a b (new) (ab) ensuring consistency between the national and European plans;
Amendment 1508 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) the coordinated development and implementation of infrastructure projects in cross-border sections, including maritime cross-border nodes;
Amendment 1509 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) the coordinated development and implementation of infrastructure projects in cross-border sections including maritime cross-border nodes;
Amendment 1510 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) the coordinated development and implementation of infrastructure projects in cross-border sections including maritime cross-border nodes;
Amendment 1511 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) improving accessibility of the TEN-T network for all users, including persons with disabilities.
Amendment 1512 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point e (e) urban nodes with local public transport and active modes;
Amendment 1513 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new) (fa) improving accessibility of the TEN-T network for all users, including persons with disabilities or with reduced mobility;
Amendment 1514 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point f b (new) (fb) modal shift and overall contribution to emissions reduction and environmental protection;
Amendment 1515 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 When relevant, the European Coordinator shall cooperate and coordinate with the rail freight governance on the activities of the working groups to avoid any duplication of work. Representatives of the rail freight governance shall be invited to relevant forums of the European Transport Corridors. Similarly, European Transport Coordinators shall be invited to attend relevant Executive Board meetings of the rail freight governance.
Amendment 1516 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 When relevant, the European Coordinator shall cooperate and coordinate with the rail freight governance on the activities of the working groups to avoid any duplication of
Amendment 1517 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 When relevant, the European Coordinator shall cooperate and coordinate with the rail freight governance on the activities of the working groups to avoid any duplication of work. Representatives of the rail freight governance shall be invited to relevant forum of ETCs. Similarly, ETC Coordinators shall be invited to attend relevant Executive meetings of the rail freight governance.
Amendment 1518 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 When relevant, the European Coordinator shall cooperate and coordinate with the rail freight governance on the activities of the working groups to avoid any duplication of work. Representatives of the rail freight governance shall be invited to relevant forum of ETCs.
Amendment 1519 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 When relevant, the European Coordinator shall cooperate and coordinate with the rail freight governance on the activities of the working groups to avoid any duplication of work and with the aim to develop a single integrated governance structure for the ETCs.
Amendment 1520 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 When relevant, the European Coordinator shall cooperate and coordinate with the rail freight governance on the activities of the working groups to avoid any duplication of work and with the aim to develop a single integrated governance structure for the ETCs.
Amendment 1521 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 3 – point a (new) (a) the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure;
Amendment 1522 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 4 4. The consultative Forum for the horizontal priorities shall be established and chaired by the European Coordinator. The Member States concerned and where appropriate representatives of the relevant
Amendment 1523 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 4 4. The consultative Forum for the horizontal priorities shall be established and chaired by the European Coordinator. The Member States concerned and where appropriate representatives of the relevant sectors, as well as where relevant local and regional authorities, shall be able to participate. Member States shall designate a national coordinator for ERTMS to attend the consultative Forum for ERTMS. The European Coordinator may also set up ad-
Amendment 1524 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 4 4. The consultative Forum for the horizontal priorities shall be established and chaired by the European Coordinator. The Member States and regional and local authorities concerned, and, where appropriate, representatives of the relevant
Amendment 1525 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 5 5. The Member States and the regional and local authorities concerned shall cooperate with the European Coordinator, participate in the Corridor Forum and the consultative forum for the horizontal priorities and give the European Coordinator the information required in order to perform the tasks laid down in this Article, including information on the development of corridors in the relevant national infrastructure plans.
Amendment 1526 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5a. The ERTMS Coordinator shall conduct, no later than six months after the entry into force of this regulation, a feasibility study that in parallel to the roll out of ERTMS transparently outlines the implementation paths to the deadlines set for 2030, 2040 and 2050, assessing the resources and financial support needs from public funding.
Amendment 1527 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator
Amendment 1528 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator
Amendment 1529 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator
Amendment 1530 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator
Amendment 1531 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator
Amendment 1532 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator
Amendment 1533 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator may consult regional and local authorities, infrastructure managers, including port managing bodies, transport operators, in particular those which are members of the rail freight governance, the supply industry, transport users, accessibility experts, and representatives of civil society in relation to the work plan and its implementation. In addition, the European Coordinator responsible for ERTMS shall closely cooperate with the European Union Agency for Railways and Europe's Rail Joint Undertaking and the European Coordinator for the European Maritime Space with the European Maritime Safety Agency.
Amendment 1534 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator may
Amendment 1535 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. Member States shall enable the creation of national TEN-T coordination offices in those specific sections integrated into several European transport corridors for the purpose of supervising the execution of the infrastructures covered by this Regulation and maintaining a direct dialogue with the European coordinators and with the national competent authorities. These national TEN-T coordination offices will preferably be set up in those nodes linked to neighbouring and third countries, in accordance with paragraph (3),letter (f) of article 52 of this Regulation.
Amendment 1536 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. To set up a future strong and centralised EU Level ERTMS governance including governing funding, National Implementation Plans (NIP) planning, resourcing, market uptake, migration and transition, the European Coordinator for ERTMS, including national IMs and RUs representatives, should facilitate and promote such governance ensuring the timely and harmonised deployment.
Amendment 1537 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. To set up a future strong and centralised EU Level ERTMS governance including governing funding, National Implementation Plans (NIP) planning, resourcing, market uptake, migration and transition, the European Coordinator for ERTMS, including national IMs and RUs representatives, should facilitate and promote such governance ensuring the timely and harmonised deployment.
Amendment 1538 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. To set up a future strong and centralised EU Level ERTMS governance including governing funding, National Implementation Plans (NIP) planning, resourcing, market uptake, migration and transition, the European Coordinator for ERTMS, including national IMs and RUs representatives, should facilitate and promote such governance ensuring the timely and harmonised deployment.
Amendment 1539 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. To set up a future strong and centralised EU Level ERTMS governance including governing funding, National Implementation Plans (NIP) planning, resourcing, market uptake, migration and transition, the European Coordinator for ERTMS, including national IMs and RUs representatives, should facilitate and promote such governance ensuring the timely and harmonised deployment.
Amendment 1540 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 a (new) 6a. To set up a future strong and centralised EU Level ERTMS governance including governing funding, National Implementation Plans (NIP) planning, resourcing, market uptake, migration and transition, the European Coordinator for ERTMS, including national IMs and RUs representatives, should facilitate and promote such governance ensuring the timely and harmonised deployment.
Amendment 1541 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. The European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) shall ensure coherence and consistency in ERTMS deployment and funding.
Amendment 1542 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. The European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) shall ensure coherence and consistency in ERTMS deployment and funding.
Amendment 1543 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. The European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA) shall ensure coherence and consistency in ERTMS deployment and funding.
Amendment 1544 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 b (new) 6 b. The European Coordinator shall consult relevant authorities and transport stakeholders in the area of influence of the European Transport Corridors
Amendment 1545 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 1. Each European Coordinator of the European Transport Corridors and the two horizontal priorities shall draw up, at the latest
Amendment 1546 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 1 1. Each European Coordinator of the European Transport Corridors and the two horizontal priorities shall draw up, in the consultation with Member States, at the latest two years after the entry into force of this Regulation and thereafter every four years, a work plan that provides a detailed analysis of the state of implementation of the corridor or horizontal priority under his/her competence and its compliance with the requirements of this Regulation as well as the priorities for its future development.
Amendment 1547 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The work plan shall be prepared in close cooperation with the Member States concerned and in consultation of the Corridor Forum and rail freight governance, or consultative forum of the horizontal priorities, and the responsible national coordinators for alternative fuels infrastructure as defined in Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure]. The work plan of the European Transport Corridors shall be approved by the Member States concerned. The Commission shall submit the work plan to the European Parliament and the Council for information.
Amendment 1548 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The work plan shall be prepared in close cooperation with the Member States and regional and local authorities concerned and in consultation of the Corridor Forum and rail freight governance, or consultative forum of the horizontal priorities. The work plan of the European Transport Corridors shall be approved by the Member States concerned. The Commission shall submit the work plan to the European Parliament and the Council for information.
Amendment 1549 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 The work plan shall be prepared in close cooperation with the Member States and regions concerned and in consultation of the Corridor Forum and rail freight governance, or consultative forum of the horizontal priorities. The work plan of the European Transport Corridors shall be approved by the Member States concerned. The Commission shall submit the work plan to the European Parliament and the Council for information.
Amendment 1550 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) an analysis of the state of compliance of the corridor with the transport infrastructure requirements of this Regulation and its related progress achieved, including the progress compared to previous cost and time estimations and deadlines set;
Amendment 1551 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) an identification of the missing links and bottlenecks hampering the development of the corridor, with particular attention to the cross-border dimension;
Amendment 1552 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) an identification of the missing links and bottlenecks hampering the development of the corridor with particular attention to cross-border sections;
Amendment 1553 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) (ca) an analysis of the state of play of cross-border sections with a view of identifying challenges and proposing concrete measures to comply with the dates set out in this Regulation and the coherence of the financial programming of the Member States concerned to achieve this aim.
Amendment 1554 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point c a (new) (ca) identification of the barriers to seamless and accessible mobility for all users of the TEN-T network;
Amendment 1555 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point d (d) an analysis of the investments required, prioritised on the basis of the social and environmental cost-benefit analysis of projects and particularly its life-cycle emissions benefits, including the different financing and funding sources committed and/or envisaged for the implementation of the projects needed for the development and completion of the corridor;
Amendment 1556 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) a description of possible solutions to address the investment needs and bottlenecks, in particular for the passenger and freight lines of the corridor, in order to minimise or prevent further delays;
Amendment 1557 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) a description of possible solutions to address the investment needs and bottlenecks, in particular for the passenger and freight lines and nodes of the corridor;
Amendment 1558 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) a description of possible solutions to address the investment needs and bottlenecks, in particular for the passenger and freight lines and nodes of the corridor;
Amendment 1559 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) a description of possible solutions to address the investment needs and bottlenecks, in particular for the passenger
Amendment 1560 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point e (e) a description of possible solutions to address the investment needs and bottlenecks, in particular for the passenger and freight lines and nodes of the corridor;
Amendment 1561 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point f (f) a plan with intermediate targets for the removal of physical, technical, digital, operational and administrative barriers between and within transport modes paying particular attention to the improvement of accessibility for all users, and for the enhancement of efficient multimodal transport with particular attention to cross-border sections and national missing links.
Amendment 1562 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point f (f) a plan with intermediate targets for the removal of physical, technical, digital, operational and administrative barriers, including barriers to seamless and accessible mobility for all users, between and within transport modes and for the enhancement of efficient multimodal transport with particular attention to cross- border sections and national missing links.
Amendment 1563 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point f (f) a plan with intermediate targets for the removal of physical, technical, digital, operational and administrative barriers between and within transport modes and for the enhancement of efficient multimodal transport with particular attention to rail and its cross-border sections and national missing links.
Amendment 1564 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point i (i) an identification of priorities including the financing sources for the development of the corridor;
Amendment 1565 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point k a (new) (ka) an overview of the development on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure based on the information provided by the national coordinators for alternative fuels infrastructure as defined in Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure];
Amendment 1566 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 4 – point a (a) the priority setting in national planning, on the basis of the social and environmental cost-benefit analysis of projects and particularly its life-cycle emissions dimension through the identification of implementation problems and bottlenecks, including operational issues, on each corridor or for each horizontal priority;
Amendment 1567 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 4 – point b a (new) (ba) monitoring project progress trends, and signalling early to the Commission potential significant delays;
Amendment 1569 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 Amendment 1570 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 1. Based on the first work plan of the European Coordinators, after its presentation to the Parliament, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act for each work plan of the European Transport Corridors and the two horizontal priorities. This implementing act shall set out the priorities for infrastructure and investment planning and for funding.
Amendment 1571 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission should take measures to deter Member States from engaging in unilateral cross border restrictions along the Corridors. If any unilateral cross-border restriction were enacted by a Member State, the Commission should intervene to avoid any mobility disruption of goods and/or people.
Amendment 1572 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 2 b (new) 2 b. A Member State may decide to enact a restriction to the traffic along a corridor only upon agreement of all Member States which are part of that corridor and which neighbour the Member States in the territory of which the section of the corridor where the restriction is to be applied falls.
Amendment 1573 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4a. The European Commission shall adopt a delegated act for a uniform, automated standard for data exchange in the area of working time and knowledge of the employees in railways. This delegated act shall ensure an easy cross border control of the working hours and the necessary knowledge (infrastructure, vehicles) of the employees.
Amendment 1574 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall undertake to inform the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress made in implementing projects of common interest and the investments made for that purpose. This information shall include the yearly transmission of data through the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans-European transport network (TENtec). It shall include technical and financial data concerning projects of common interest on the trans- European transport network as well as data on the completion of the trans-
Amendment 1575 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall inform the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress made in implementing projects of common interest and the investments made for that purpose. This information shall include the yearly transmission of data th
Amendment 1576 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall inform the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress made in implementing projects of common interest and the investments made for that purpose. This information shall include the yearly transmission of data th
Amendment 1577 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall inform the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress made in implementing projects of common interest and the investments made for that purpose, including specific information on cross-border sections where applicable. This information shall include the yearly transmission of data through the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans-European transport network (TENtec). It shall include technical and financial data concerning projects of common interest on the trans- European transport network as well as data on the completion of the trans-
Amendment 1578 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall inform the European Coordinator and the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress made in implementing projects of common
Amendment 1579 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3a. The Commission shall develop the rail connectivity index with the aim of categorising the level of integration achieved through the use of services on the rail network and showing their potential. It shall identify the consistency, the quality, the diversity of the offer of rail services and allow comparisons between different parts of the network and corridors. The Commission shall ensure that the rail connectivity index, both overall and for the different corridors, is regularly updated according to the implementation of projects on the TEN-T. The index shall be used as an indicator to channel Union funds where rail connectivity is lacking.
Amendment 1580 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Subject to the second paragraph of Article 172 TFEU, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 60 to amend Annexes I and II,
Amendment 1581 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) exclude maritime ports and airports from the comprehensive network, if it is demonstrated that the average of their traffic volume over the last six years is below 85% of the relevant threshold and after initiating a monitoring procedure taking into account qualitative indicators such as their strategic location and contribution of the EU strategic autonomy and any cyclical factors explaining the decline in traffic flow;
Amendment 1582 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) exclude maritime ports and airports from the comprehensive network, if it is demonstrated that the average of their traffic volume over the last six years is below 85% of the relevant threshold. In order to guarantee a high degree of network stability, the port’s or airport’s development plan, traffic prognosis or geopolitical importance or role for the energy supply should be considered prior to the exclusion from the network, in addition to current traffic volumes;
Amendment 1583 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) exclude maritime ports and airports from the comprehensive network, if it is demonstrated that the average of their traffic volume over the last six years is below 85% of the relevant threshold. In order to guarantee a high degree of network stability, the port’s or airport’s development plan, traffic prognosis or geopolitical importance or role for the energy supply should be considered prior to the exclusion from the network, in addition to current traffic volumes;
Amendment 1584 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) exclude maritime ports and airports from the comprehensive network, if it is demonstrated that the average of their traffic volume over the last six years is below 85% of the relevant threshold; In order to guarantee a high degree of network stability, the port’s or airport’s development plan, traffic prognosis or geopolitical importance or role for the energy supply should be considered prior to the exclusion from the network, in addition to current traffic volumes;
Amendment 1585 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) exclude maritime ports and airports from the comprehensive network, if it is demonstrated that the average of their traffic volume over the last six years is below 85% of the relevant threshold. To ensure a high degree of network stability, the port’s or airport’s development plan, traffic prognosis or geopolitical and strategic importance or role for the energy supply, production and security should be considered prior to the exclusion from the network, in addition to current traffic volumes;
Amendment 1586 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) exclude
Amendment 1587 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) include maritime ports in the core network at the request of a Member State when maritime ports comply with Article 25 paragraphs (1) and (2) and have a geopolitical strategic importance and European added value in terms of emergency supply chains, geopolitical importance, military mobility and energy security.
Amendment 1588 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) include maritime ports in the comprehensive network at the request of a Member State when maritime ports have a geopolitical strategic importance and European added value in terms of emergency supply chains, geopolitical importance, military mobility and energy security.
Amendment 1589 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b a (new) (ba) exclude maritime ports from the comprehensive network, if it is demonstrated that the average of their traffic volume over the last eight years is below 75% of the relevant threshold;
Amendment 1590 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) include urban nodes in the trans- European transport network, if it is demonstrated that the number of inhabitants
Amendment 1591 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) include urban nodes in the trans- European transport network, if it is demonstrated that the number of inhabitants
Amendment 1592 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) include urban nodes in the trans- European transport network, if it is demonstrated that the number of inhabitants exceeds 100,000, or if the urban node is identified as a cluster for raw material extraction or industrial production being of great strategic importance for the Union;
Amendment 1593 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c (c) include urban nodes in the trans- European transport network, if it is demonstrated that the number of inhabitants exceeds 100,000 and in close cooperation with Member States and their regional and local authorities;
Amendment 1594 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) include an opt-in mechanism for urban nodes alongside the TEN-T corridors, to be included in the lists in Annex II, at the request of a Member State with the previous agreement of the urban node concerned and its relevant authorities.
Amendment 1595 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) Regularly assesses the classification of the urban nodes in the network in close coordination with regional and local authorities;
Amendment 1596 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new) (ca) Regularly assesses the classification of the urban nodes in the network in close coordination with regional and local authorities;
Amendment 1597 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The adaptations referred to in points (a) to (c) of the first subparagraph shall be based on the latest available statistics published by Eurostat or, if those statistics are not available, by the national statistics offices of the Member States. The adaptations referred to in point (d) of the first subparagraph shall be based on the action plan referred to in Article 35(4). The adaptations referred to in point (e) of the first subparagraph shall be based on the information provided by the Member States concerned in accordance with Article 55(1).
Amendment 1598 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The adaptations referred to in points (a) to (c) of the first subparagraph shall be based on the latest available statistics published
Amendment 1599 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point 1 (new) (1) Notwithstanding to the maps set out in Annex I and without prejudice to the provisions in Article 46, Member States may identify additional railway lines, further referred to as diversionary rail routes, with the purpose of increasing the resilience of the network in case of major disruptions or unforeseen capacity constraints to become part of the European Transport Corridors according to Article 50;
Amendment 1600 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point 2 (new) (2) The identification of a diversionary rail route shall be based on experience with major disruptions in the past, on the impact of these disruptions on the reliability of logistics chains and on traffic forecasts for the European Transport Corridor to which it will contribute;
Amendment 1601 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point 3 (new) (3) The concerned Member State(s) may notify the need for a diversionary rail route to be included in European Transport Corridor to the responsible European Coordinator according to Article 51 (1).
Amendment 1602 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 National procedures regarding the involvement and consultation of regional and local authorities and civil society concerned by a project of common interest, and particularly relevant environmental NGOs, shall be complied with, where appropriate, in the planning and construction phase of a project. The Commission shall promote the exchange of good practice in this regard, notably as regards the
Amendment 1603 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall ensure that national transport and investment plans are coherent with Union transport policy, with the priorities and deadlines set out in this Regulation and with the priorities set out in
Amendment 1604 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 2 2. National investment plans shall include all projects of common interest and related investments needed for the timely completion of the network, with a particular focus on the elimination of capacity constraints and bottlenecks for rail, as well as the completion of its cross- border links.
Amendment 1605 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2a. The Commission shall be a consultative body in the regular process of Member States producing their national plans and shall, as such, respect the regular time frames set up by the Member State for the consultative work.
Amendment 1606 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall notify to the Commission the draft national plans and programmes, or any modification of those, with a view to developing the trans- European transport network
Amendment 1607 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall notify to the Commission the draft national plans and programmes, or any modification of those, with a view to developing the trans-
Amendment 1608 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 2 2. The power to adopt delegated acts referred to in Article
Amendment 1609 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 3 3. The delegation of powers referred to in Article
Amendment 1610 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 60 – paragraph 5 5. A delegated act adopted pursuant to Article
Amendment 1611 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 By 31 December 20
Amendment 1612 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 The assessment shall take into account the national plans and the annual status report and the work plans drawn up by the European Coordinators pursuant to Article 51(5), point (e) and Article 53(1) respectively.
Amendment 1613 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point b (b) progress in the implementation of this Regulation, including any significant delays in concrete projects or sections of the network;
Amendment 1614 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2 a (new) The evaluation shall also include the progress in modal shift towards rail and the degree of compliance with the goals set for 2030, as well as the measures needed to ensure compliance with subsequent targets, such as the ones for 2050.
Amendment 1615 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 1 1. In the event of significant delay in starting or completing work on the core network, extended core network and on the comprehensive network compared to the initial timeline set in implementing acts in accordance with Article 54 or defined in national transport and investment plans or other relevant project documentation, the
Amendment 1616 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Commission
Amendment 1617 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Commission may, after considering the reasons provided by the Member State or Member States concerned pursuant to the first subparagraph, adopt a decision addressed to the Member State or Member States concerned, finding that the significant delay in starting or completing the work on the core network, extended core network or on the comprehensive network is attributable to the Member State or Member States without an objective justification. The Commission shall give the Member State or Member States concerned 6 months to eliminate the significant delay with the possibility to grant an extension.
Amendment 1618 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 1619 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 1 The provisions relating to railways, and in particular any requirement to connect airports and ports to railways as well as the provisions related to safe and secure parking and multimodal freight terminals shall not apply to Cyprus, Malta and the outermost and island regions for as long as no railway system is established within their territory.
Amendment 1620 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 63 – paragraph 1 The provisions relating to railways, and in particular any requirement to connect airports and ports to railways as well as the
Amendment 1621 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 64 – paragraph 1 Annex PART III to Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 is amended in accordance with Annex VI to this Regulation. .
Amendment 1622 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new) Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 Article 1 – paragraph 2 a (new) (1a) in Article 1, the following paragraph is added as third paragraph: ‘3. This Regulation shall not apply to Member States with no cross-border rail links with another Member State.’
Amendment 1623 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point 7 Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 Article 9 – paragraph 3 Amendment 1624 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 Article 11 – paragraph 2 2. The management board shall consult the advisory groups referred to in Articles 8(7) and 8(8) on infrastructure development and investment needs. The consultation shall be based on an adequate, up-to-date documentation of the infrastructure planning at corridor and national level. New or updated investments proposals by the advisory groups shall be supported by proper technical and whenever necessary (major infrastructure investments e.g. new lines) market analyses. The executive board shall ensure adequate coordination between these consultation activities and the coordination mechanisms at national level as defined in Article 7e of Directive 2012/34/EU.
Amendment 1625 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. The cooperation and the consultation between all parties (EBs, MBs, Coordinator, advisory groups) shall address in particular:
Amendment 1626 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 Article 11 – paragraph 3 – introductory part 3. The cooperation and the consultation between all parties (EBs, MBs, Coordinator, advisory groups) shall address in particular:
Amendment 1627 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) need for targeted investments to upgrade infrastructure according to the TEN-T requirements and to remove local bottlenecks, such as connecting loops, improvements to nodes and last-mile infrastructure or technical equipment enhancing operational performance.
Amendment 1628 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) need for targeted investments to upgrade infrastructure according to the TEN-T requirements and to remove local bottlenecks, such as connecting loops, improvements to nodes and last-mile infrastructure or technical equipment enhancing operational performance.
Amendment 1629 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point 8 Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 Article 11 – paragraph 3 – point c (c) need for targeted investments to upgrade infrastructure according to the TEN-T requirements to remove local bottlenecks, such as connecting loops, improvements to nodes and last-mile infrastructure or technical equipment enhancing operational performance.
Amendment 1630 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 65 – paragraph 1 – point 10 Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 Article 22 Every
source: 738.715
2022/12/01
TRAN
13 amendments...
Amendment 1850 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 18/23 and part 19/23 Add the following to the core network: - Bolzano and Rovereto rail freight bypasses (conventional).
Amendment 1851 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 18/23 and part 19/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - La Spezia - Parma rail freight line, rail passengers’ line (conventional) - Civitavecchia - Pescara/Ortona rail freight line, rail passengers’ line (conventional)
Amendment 1852 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 18/23 and part 19/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Caltanissetta - Marsala/Agrigento/Licata/Gela/Pozzallo rail freight line, rail passengers’ line (conventional)
Amendment 1853 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 19/23 Add the following to the core network: - Roma - Teramo motorway. - Genova – Pisa – Firenze passengers rail line (high speed)
Amendment 1854 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 19/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Bari - Brindisi - Lecce passengers rail line (conventional) - Bologna - Foggia passengers rail line (high speed) - Pisa – Roma passengers rail line (conventional) - Rosignano Marittimo - Civitavecchia motorway.
Amendment 1855 #
Node name: Pisa Airport: Co
Amendment 1856 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IT Node name: Catania Airport: Co
Amendment 1857 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IT Node name: Licata Port: Comprehensive
Amendment 1858 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IT Node name: Ortona Port: Comprehensive
Amendment 1859 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IT Node name: Pescara Port: Comprehensive
Amendment 1860 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IT Node name:Lecce Urban node: X
Amendment 1861 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 6/14 - part 7/14 Add the followingto the Scandinavian- Mediterranean Corridor: - Villa San Giovanni - Messina motorway, passengers’s rail line, freight rail line (bridge - fixed link).
Amendment 1862 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 4 - - part 5/12 Add the followingto the Scandinavian- Mediterranean Corridor: - Chiasso - Como sanGiovanni passengers rail line (conventional) - Chiasso - Bivio Rosales fright rail line (conventional)
source: 739.613
2023/01/25
TRAN
219 amendments...
Amendment 1631 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 2/23 Add the following to the core network: - Buzau - Galati Add Galati as Rail-Road Terminal (RRT)
Amendment 1632 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 2/23 Add to the inland waterways - Hals - Aalborg - Thyboron
Amendment 1633 #
Add the following to the core network: - Craiova - Caracal - Alexandria - Bucuresti
Amendment 1634 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 3/23 Add the following to comprehensive network: - Craiova - Pitesti Add Galati as Rail-Road Terminal (RRT)
Amendment 1635 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 - Part 3/23 - map 1a (new) EU High-Speed Rail Network (HSR) - Existing and Missing Links
Amendment 1636 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 4/23 Add the following to the core network: - Kouvola-Imatra rail freight line
Amendment 1637 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 4/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Trelleborg (SE) - Rostock (DE)
Amendment 1638 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 5/23 Add the following to the core network: - Turku-Salo-Espoo-Helsinki rail passenger connection (both conventional and ≥ 200 km/h / new construction)
Amendment 1639 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 5/23 Add the following to the core network: - Tampere-Helsinki high-speed railway passenger line
Amendment 1640 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 6/23 Add the following to the core network: - Limerick – Galway – Sligo - Letterkenny rail freight line (Conventional/New Construction)
Amendment 1641 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 7/23 Add the following to the core network: - Limerick Junction – Limerick -Galway- Sligo-Letterkenny rail passenger line (Conventional/New Construction railway) - Cork – Limerick – Galway – Sligo- Letterkenny Motorway
Amendment 1642 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 9/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Colmar - Freiburg rail passengers line
Amendment 1643 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 9/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Haguenau - Roeschwoog - Rastatt rail passengers line
Amendment 1644 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 11/23 Add the following to North Sea-Baltic Corridor: - Zwolle (NL) - Coevorden (NL) - Bentheim (DE)
Amendment 1645 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 11/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Zwolle (NL) - Münster (DE) rail passenger line
Amendment 1646 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 11/23 Amendment 1647 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 11/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Amsterdam (NL) - Groningen (NL) - Bremen (DE) rail passenger line
Amendment 1648 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 11/23 Add the following to the Extended Core network: - Include the railway connection ‘Lelylijn’ from Amsterdam to Groningen (NL)
Amendment 1649 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 12/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Colmar-Freiburg rail passenger line (conventional/new construction)
Amendment 1650 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 12/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Rastatt-Hagenau rail passenger line (conventional/new construction)
Amendment 1651 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 12/23 Amendment 1652 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 12/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Berlin – Küstrin-Kietz – Kostrzyn rail freight line (conventional/ new construction)
Amendment 1653 #
Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Berlin (DE) - Kostryzn (PL)
Amendment 1654 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 12/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Cologne (DE) - Siegen (DE)
Amendment 1655 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 12/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Karlsruhe (DE) Wörth - Lauterbourg (FR)- Strasbourg (FR)
Amendment 1656 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 12/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Bad Oldesloe (DE) - Neumünster (DE)
Amendment 1657 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 12/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Lüneburg (DE) - Lübeck (DE)
Amendment 1658 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 12/23 Add the following to the core network: - Nürnberg - Amberg - Furth im Wald rail freight line (conventional/new construction
Amendment 1659 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 12/23 Add the following to the core network: - Lübeck – Travemünde Skandinavienkai rail freight line (conventional/new construction)
Amendment 1660 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 12/23 Add the following to the core network: - Neumünster – Bad Oldesloe rail freight line (conventional/new construction)
Amendment 1661 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 12/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Wittenberge - Magdeburg rail passengers line (conventional)
Amendment 1662 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 12/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Kassel - Sangerhausen - Halle (Saale) rail passengers line (conventional/ new construction
Amendment 1663 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Kassel - Sangerhausen - Halle (Saale) rail passengers line (conventional/ new construction
Amendment 1664 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Include the following sections as high- speed (≥ 250 km/h) rail freight and rail passengers lines: - Verona (IT) – Innsbruck (AT) – Munich (DE) (core network)
Amendment 1665 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Berlin -Kostrzyn(conventional / new construction)
Amendment 1666 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Berlin – Küstrin-Kietz – Kostrzyn rail passenger line (conventional/new construction)
Amendment 1667 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Amsterdam (NL) - Groningen (NL) - Bremen (DE) rail passenger line
Amendment 1668 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Add the following to the core network: - Amsterdam - Groningen rail passengers line (> 200 km/h / new construction)
Amendment 1669 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Add the following to the core network: - Groningen - Bremen rail passengers line (> 200 km/h / new construction)
Amendment 1670 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Colmar-Freiburg rail passengers line (conventional / new construction)
Amendment 1671 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Add the following to the core network: - Magdeburg – Halle (Saale) - Leipzig rail passengers line (conventional/new construction)
Amendment 1672 #
Add the following to the extended core network: - Wittenberge - Magdeburg rail passengers line (conventional)
Amendment 1673 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Colmar-Freiburg rail passengers line (conventional/ new construction)
Amendment 1674 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Colmar-Freiburg rail passenger line (conventional/new construction)
Amendment 1675 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Hagenau/Roeschwoog - Rastatt/Karlsruhe rail passengers line (conventional / new construction)
Amendment 1676 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Rastatt-Hagenau rail passenger line (conventional/new construction)
Amendment 1677 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 13/23 Add the following to the core network: - Nürnberg - Amberg - Furth im Wald rail passenger line (conventional/new construction)
Amendment 1678 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 Add the following to the core network: - El Ferrol - A Coruña (rail freight / ≥ 200 km/h.) - El Ferrol - Lugo - Monforte (rail freight / ≥ 200 km/h.)
Amendment 1679 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 Add the following to the core network: - Ferrol - A Coruña (freight)
Amendment 1680 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 Add the following to the core network: - Zaragoza-Tardienta (freight rail)
Amendment 1681 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 Add the following to the core network: - Zaragoza-Tardienta (freight)
Amendment 1682 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 Add the following to the core network: - Zaragoza-Lleida-Tarragona (freight/conventional)
Amendment 1683 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 Add the following to the core network: - Zaragoza-Lleida-Tarragona (freight/conventional)
Amendment 1684 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 Add the following to the core network: - Vigo - Porto (passenger and freight
Amendment 1685 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 and part 17/23 Add the following to the core network: - Santiago - Vigo - Ourense (freight)
Amendment 1686 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 Add the following to the core network: - Santiago – Vigo – Orense (rail freight / ≥ 200 km/h / New Constr.)
Amendment 1687 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 Add the following to the core network: - Santiago - Ourense (passenger)
Amendment 1688 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 17/23 Add the following to the core network: - Orense- Santiago (passenger rail/ ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1689 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 and part 17/23 Add the following to the core network: - Santiago – Vigo (rail freight / ≥ 200 km/h) - Port of Bahía de Cádiz
Amendment 1690 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 and part 17/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Astorga – Zamora – Salamanca – Plasencia (passenger and freight rail / Conventional/New Constr.)
Amendment 1691 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 and part 17/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Plasencia - Salamanca - Astorga (freight and passenger)
Amendment 1692 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 and part 17/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Granada – Motril (passenger and freight rail / Conventional / New Constr.)
Amendment 1693 #
Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Granada - Port of Motril (freight and passenger/new construction
Amendment 1694 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 and part 17/23 Add high speed for rail freight and passenger to the following to the core network: Pamplona (ES)-Ezkio/Itxaso (ES)
Amendment 1695 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 and part 17/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Pau - Huesca (freight and passenger)
Amendment 1696 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 and part 17/23 Add high speed for rail freight and passenger to the following to the core network: Bilbao (ES)-Santander (ES)
Amendment 1697 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 and part 17/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Santander - Bilbao (freight and passengers/≥ 200 km/h/new construction)
Amendment 1698 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 16/23 and part 17/23 Amendment 1699 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 17/23 Add the following to the core network: Porto - Vila Real - Bragança - Zamora (passenger and cargo rail/ ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1700 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 17/23 Add the following to the core network: - Lagos - Vila Real de Santo António (passenger rail/ ≥ 200 km/h
Amendment 1701 #
Add the following to the core network: - Medina del Campo – Salamanca – Fuentes de Oñoro (passenger rail / ≥ 200 km/h) - Madrid – Adanero – Tordesillas – Benavente – Ponferrada – Lugo – A Coruña (Road) - Astorga – León – Carrión de los Condes – Burgos (Road) - Port of Bahía de Cádiz - Vigo - Porto (passenger rail/ ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1702 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 17/23 Add the following to the core network: - Vigo - Porto (passenger rail/ ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1703 #
Add the following to the extended core network: - Sevilla – Huelva – Faro (passenger rail / ≥ 200 km/h / New Constr.) - Córdoba - Jaén – Granada (Conventional) - Madrid – Alcázar de San Juan – Jaén (Conventional) - Bilbao – Santander (passenger and freight rail / ≥ 200 km/h / New Constr.)
Amendment 1704 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 17/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Astorga – Zamora – Salamanca – Plasencia (rail freight / Conventional) - Aguilar de Campoo – Venta de Baños (Road) - Plasencia – Navalmoral de la Mata (Road) - Almería – Guadix (Road) - Cuenca – Tarancón – Ocaña (Road) - Soria – Aranda de Duero – Valladolid (Road)
Amendment 1705 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 17/23 Add the following to the core network: - Utrera- Granada- Almería (passenger and freight rail/ ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1706 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 18/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Zagreb (HR) - Maribor (SI) - Graz (AT) railfreight / passenger (conventional/new construction
Amendment 1707 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 - Part 18/23 and Part 19/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Zagreb (HR) - Maribor (SI) - Graz (AT) rail freight/passenger line (conventional/new construction)
Amendment 1708 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 18/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Pula - Buzet (HR) - Divača (SI) - Trieste (IT) rail freight/passenger line Lupoglav – Buzet - state border (SI) - Prešnica (SI)
Amendment 1709 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 18/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Čakovec - Varaždin - Lepoglava - Zabok Zagreb rail freight/passenger line
Amendment 1710 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 18/23 Add the following to the core network: - Bussoleno - Avigliana ( ≥ 200 km/h) - Orbassano - Torino S.Paolo ( ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1711 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 18/23 Add the following to the core network: - Bologna – Ancona ( ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1712 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 18/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Ancona – Foggia ( ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1713 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 18/23 and part 19/23 Include the following sections as high- speed (≥ 200 km/h) rail freight and rail passengers lines: Bologna – Foggia (comprehensive network) Salerno – Battipaglia (comprehensive network)
Amendment 1714 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 18/23 Add the following to the core network: - Battipaglia - Praia a mare rail freight line
Amendment 1715 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 18/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Bari-Lecce
Amendment 1716 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 19/23 Add the following to the core network: - Bussoleno - Avigliana ( ≥ 200 km/h) - Orbassano - Torino S.Paolo ( ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1717 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 19/23 Add the following to the core network: - Chiasso - Como San Giovanni
Amendment 1718 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 19/23 Add the following to the core network: - Bologna – Ancona ( ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1719 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 19/23 Add the following to the extended core network: - Ancona – Foggia ( ≥ 200 km/h)
Amendment 1720 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 19/23 Add the following to the core network: - La Spezia - Genova - Genova - Ventimiglia
Amendment 1721 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 19/23 Include the following sections as high- speed (≥ 250 km/h) rail passengers lines: - Milano – Trevigilio (core network) - Treviglio – Verona (core network)
Amendment 1722 #
Add the following to the extended core network: Postojna (SI) - Rijeka - Žuta Lokva road (HR) Add the following to the core network: Zagreb (HR) - Maribor (SI) - Graz (AT) road
Amendment 1723 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 19/23 Add the following to the comprehensive network: Rijeka - Divača (SI) - Trieste (IT) road connection Kanfanar – Umag – State border - (SI) road connection
Amendment 1724 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 19/23 Add the following to the core network: - Battipaglia - Praia a Mare rail passenger line
Amendment 1725 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 20/23 Add the following to the core network: - Buzau - Galati
Amendment 1726 #
Add the following to the core and/or the comprehensive network: - Ruse - Razgrad - Shumen - Provadia - Devnya - Varna (inland waterways
Amendment 1727 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 21/23 Add the following to the core network: - Craiova-Caracal-Alexandria-Bucuresti
Amendment 1728 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 1 – part 21/23 Add the following to comprehensive network - Craiova - Pitesti
Amendment 1729 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section DK Node name: Aalborg Inland port: Core
Amendment 1730 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section DE Amendment 1731 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section DE Node name: Kiel Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1732 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section DE Amendment 1733 #
Amendment 1734 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IE Node name: Galway Maritime port: Core
Amendment 1735 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IE Node name: Killybegs Maritime port: Core
Amendment 1736 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IE Node name: Sligo Maritime port: Core
Amendment 1737 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IE Node name: Carraig Fhiáin/Carrickfin Airport: co
Amendment 1738 #
Node name: An Cnoc/Knock Airport: co
Amendment 1739 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IE Node name: Luimeneach/Limerick Airport: co
Amendment 1740 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Algeciras
Amendment 1741 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Cádiz Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1742 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Cádiz Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1743 #
Node name: Castellón Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1744 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Castellón Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1745 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Ferrol Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1746 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Ferrol Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1747 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Gandía Maritime port: Comprehensive
Amendment 1748 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Gandía Maritime port: Comprehensive
Amendment 1749 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Pontevedra (Puerto de Marín- Ría) Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1750 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Santander Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1751 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Santander Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1752 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Vigo Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1753 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Vigo Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1754 #
Node name: Vilagarcía de Arousa Maritime port: Comprehensive
Amendment 1755 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section ES Node name: Vilagarcía de Arousa Maritime port: Comprehensive
Amendment 1756 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section FR Node name: Ajaccio (Corsica) Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1757 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section FR Node name: Bastia (Corsica) Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1758 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section HR Node name: Ploče Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1759 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section HR Node name: Ploče
Amendment 1760 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IT Node name: Battipaglia Urban node: X
Amendment 1761 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IT Node name: Brindisi Urban node: X Airport: Co
Amendment 1762 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IT Node name: Foggia Urban node: X Airport: Co
Amendment 1763 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IT Node name: Lecce Rail road terminals: Core
Amendment 1764 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IT Node name: Modena Rail Road Terminals: Marzaglia Multimodal Terminal
Amendment 1765 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section IT Node name: Marzaglia Multimodal Terminal (Modena) Urban node: Core
Amendment 1766 #
Node name: Salerno Airport: Comprehensive
Amendment 1767 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section AT Node Name: Klagenfurt Rail road terminals: co
Amendment 1768 #
Node Name: Bydgoszcz Rail road terminals: co
Amendment 1769 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section PT Node Name: Caniçal (Madeira) Maritime Port: Core
Amendment 1770 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section PT Node Name: Madeira Maritime Port: Core
Amendment 1771 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section RO Node name: Brasov Airport: Comprehensive
Amendment 1772 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section RO Node name: Galati Rail road terminals: Core
Amendment 1773 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section FI (new) Node name: Kaskinen Maritime port: Comprehensive
Amendment 1774 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section FI Node name: Kokkola Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1775 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section FI Node name: Oulu / Uleåborg Maritime port: Co
Amendment 1776 #
Node name: Pietarsaari Maritime port: Comprehensive
Amendment 1777 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section SE Node name: Borlänge Urban node: X
Amendment 1778 #
Node name: Luleå Urban node: X
Amendment 1779 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 2 - table - section SE Node name: Östersund Urban node: X
Amendment 1780 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 1/14 Add the following to the map of European Transport corridors: - Prolong the Baltic-Adriatic Corridor from Świnoujście (PL) to Ystad (SE) and connect it to the Scandinavian- Mediterranean Corridor in Malmö (SE).
Amendment 1781 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 1/14 Add the following to the map of European Transport corridors: - Prolong the North Sea-Baltic Corridor from Ventspils (LV) across the Baltic Sea to Stockholm (SE) and connect it to the Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor in Stockholm (SE).
Amendment 1782 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - 1/14 Add the following to the map of European Transport corridors: - include the maritime link Marseille - Ajaccio in the Mediterranean corridor - include the maritime link Cagliari - Ajaccio in the Mediterranean corridor
Amendment 1783 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - 1/14 Add the following to the map of European Transport corridors: - include the maritime link Genoa - Bastia in the Rhine - Alpine corridor.
Amendment 1784 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - 1/14 Add the following to the map of European Transport corridors: - include the maritime link La Spezia - Bastia in the Scandinavian - Mediterranean corridor - include the maritime link Livorno - Bastia in the Scandinavian - Mediterranean corridor
Amendment 1785 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 1/14 Amendment 1786 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - Part 1/14 Add the following to the corridor Western Balkans : - Sofia - Skopje - Durres (entire section)
Amendment 1787 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - Part 1/14 – map 1a (new) High-speed rail network for a speed of 250km/h or above in the European Transport Corridors - rail passengers connections
Amendment 1788 #
EU High-Speed Rail Network (HSR) Missing Links - With and Without Expected Year of Completion
Amendment 1789 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 2/14 Add the following to the Atlantic Corridor: - Madrid – Adanero – Tordesillas – Benavente – Ponferrada – Lugo – A Coruña (Road) - Astorga – León – Carrión de los Condes – Burgos (Road) - A Coruña – Gijón – Santander - Bilbao (Road) - Santiago – Vigo (Rail freight) - Bilbao – Santander (Rail passengers) - Port of Bahía de Cádiz - Sevilla – Huelva – Faro (Rail passengers)
Amendment 1790 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 2/14 Add the following to the corridor Atlantic Corridor: - Santander - Bilbao
Amendment 1791 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 3/14 Add the following to the corridor North Sea – Alpine: - Cork-Limerick-Galway-Sligo- Letterkenny motorway - Limerick – Galway – Sligo - Letterkenny rail freight line - Port of Sligo - Port of Galway - Port of Killybegs
Amendment 1792 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 4/14 Add the following to the corridor North Sea – Alpine: - Limerick Junction – Limerick -Galway- -Sligo-Letterkenny rail passengers line - Ireland West Airport Knock - Shannon Airport - Donegal Airport
Amendment 1793 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 3/14 and part 4/14 Add the following to the Rhine - Alpine corridor: - the port of Bastia (Corsica) The above port shall be included in the core network as specified in Annex 1.
Amendment 1794 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 5/14 Amendment 1795 #
Add the following to the corridor North Sea - Baltic Corridor : - Zwolle (NL) - Münster (DE) rail passenger line
Amendment 1796 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 5/14 Add the following to North Sea-Baltic Corridor: - Zwolle (NL) - Coevorden (NL) - Bentheim (DE)
Amendment 1797 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 6/14 and part 7/14 Amendment 1798 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 7/14 Add the following to the Scandinavian - Mediterranean corridor: - Stockholm-Oslo railway (rail passengers line)
Amendment 1799 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 7/14 Add the following to the Scandinavian- Mediterranean corridor: - Bari - Brindisi - Lecce rail passenger line
Amendment 1800 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 7/14 Add the following to the corridor Baltic Sea – Adriatic Sea: - Bari-Lecce
Amendment 1801 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 7/14 and part 8/14 Add the following to the corridor Baltic Sea - Adriatic Sea: - Rijeka - Zagreb motorway - port of Rijeka (“core”) -Rijeka - Zagreb rail freight/passenger line
Amendment 1802 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 9/14 Add the following to the corridor Rhine - Danube: - Ruse - Razgrad - Shumen - Provadia - Devnya - Varna (inland waterways The above lines shall be included in the core and/or the comprehensive network as specified in Annex
Amendment 1803 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 9/14 Remove the following from the Rhine - Danube corridor: - Elbe river (inland waterway)
Amendment 1804 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 9/14 Remove the following from the Rhine - Danube corridor: - Sava river (inland waterway)
Amendment 1805 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 9/14 Add the following to the corridor Rhine- Danube Corridor: - Nuremberg - Sulzbach - Rosenberg - Amberg - Schwandorf rail freight and rail passengers line The above rail line shall be included in the core network as specified in Annex 1
Amendment 1806 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 9/14 Add the following to the corridor Rhine- Danube - Craiova - Alexandria Bucuresti
Amendment 1807 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 9/14 Delete the following from the corridor Rhine-Danube: - Craiova -Pitesti
Amendment 1808 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 9/14 Add the following to the corridor Rhine- Danube - Buzau - Galati
Amendment 1809 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 10/14 and part 11/14 Add the following to the corridor Mediterranean Corridor: - Maintain the route of the Mediterranean Corridor, including across Hungary
Amendment 1810 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 10/14 Add the following to the Mediterranean Corridor: - Maintain the route of the Mediterranean Corridor, including across Hungary
Amendment 1811 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 10/14 Amendment 1812 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 10/14 and part 11/14 Add the following to the Mediterranean corridor: - the port of Ajaccio (Corsica) - the port of Cagliari (Sardinia) The above port shall be included in the core network as specified in Annex 1.
Amendment 1813 #
Add the following to the Mediterranean Corridor: - Córdoba - Jaén – Granada (Rail passengers) - Madrid – Alcázar de San Juan – Jaén (Rail passengers)
Amendment 1814 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 12/14 Add the following to the corridor Western Balkans : - Port of Ploče The above port shall be included in the core network as specified in Annex 1.
Amendment 1815 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 - part 12/14 and part 13/14 Add the following to the corridor Western Balkans : - Sofia - Skopje - Durres (road, rail freight and rail passengers, for the entire section ) - Port of Durres
Amendment 1816 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 13/14 Add the following to the corridor Baltic- Black-Aegean Seas: - Craiova - Alexandria - Bucuresti
Amendment 1817 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 3 – part 13/14 Delete the following from the corridor Baltic- Black-Aegean Seas: - Craiova - Pitesti
Amendment 1818 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 4 - part 1/12 and part 8/12 Amendment 1819 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 4 – part 2/12 Amendment 1820 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 4 - part 6/12 Add the following to the extended core network: - Skopje - Durres (rail freight)
Amendment 1821 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 4 - part 7/12 Add the following to the extended core network: - Skopje - Durres (rail passengers)
Amendment 1822 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 4 – part 8/12 Add the following to the core network: - Ungheni - Balti - Balti - Ocnita - Mohyliv / Podylski- Zhmerynka
Amendment 1823 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 4 – part 8/12 Delete the following from the comprehensive network: - Balti - Soroca (MD/UA border) - Soroca (MD/UA border) - Hardkivka
Amendment 1824 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 4 – part 8/12 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Chisinau-Cainari - Basarabeasca - Berezyne -Bilhorod - Odesa - Basarabeasca - Etulia - Reni - Giurgiulesti
Amendment 1825 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 4 – part 8/12 Add the following to the core network: - Palanca - Odesa
Amendment 1826 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex 4 – part 8/12 Add the following to the comprehensive network: - Anenii Noi - Odesa - Riscani - Soroca - Soroca - Vinnytsia - Zhitomir
Amendment 1827 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 1 1. Goals and objectives: A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) shall have as central goal improving accessibility of the functional urban area and providing high- quality, safe, affordable and sustainable low-emission mobility to, through and within the functional urban area, for all users. It shall notably support zero- emission mobility and the implementation of an urban transport system which contributes to a better overall performance of the trans-European transport network, in particular through the development of infrastructure for the seamless circulation of zero-emission vehicles as well as of multimodal passenger hubs to facilitate first and last mile connections and of multimodal freight terminals serving urban nodes. It shall in addition contribute to a modal shift towards more sustainable transport modes, including public transport, active modes and electric micromobility, and contribute to the decrease of automotive vehicle use, except for public transport, within and to the urban area.
Amendment 1828 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 1 1. Goals and objectives: A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) shall have as central goal improving accessibility of the
Amendment 1829 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 1 Amendment 1830 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 1 1. Goals and objectives: A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) shall have as central goal improving accessibility of the functional urban area (urban, peri-urban, and rural zones) and providing high- quality, inclusive safe and sustainable low- emission mobility to, through and within the functional urban area. It shall notably support low and zero-emission mobility and the implementation of an urban transport system which contributes to a better overall performance of the trans- European transport network, in particular through the development of infrastructure for the seamless circulation of low and zero-emission vehicles
Amendment 1831 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 2 2. Long-term vision and short-term implementation plan: A SUMP shall include a – or be linked to an existing – long term strategy, including in financial terms, for the future development of transport infrastructure and multi-modal services. It shall also include a delivery plan for the short-term implementation of the strategy. It shall be embedded into an integrated approach for sustainable development of the urban area and linked to relevant land-use and spatial planning.
Amendment 1832 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 2 2. Long-term vision and short-term implementation plan: A SUMP shall include a – or be linked to an existing – long term strategy for the future development of transport infrastructure and multi-modal services. It shall also include a delivery plan for the short-term implementation of the strategy. It shall be embedded into an integrated approach for sustainable and accessible development of the urban area and linked to relevant land- use and spatial planning.
Amendment 1833 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 3 3. Integration of the different modes of transport: A SUMP shall promote multimodal transport through the integration of the different modes and measures aimed at facilitating seamless and sustainable mobility. It shall include actions to increase the modal share of the more
Amendment 1834 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 3 3. Integration of the different modes of transport: A SUMP shall promote multimodal transport through the integration of the different modes and measures aimed at facilitating seamless and sustainable mobility, with prioritisation measures within the traffic flow, as well as street infrastructure and crossings design, to the benefit of active modes such as cycling, electric micromobility and public transport. It shall include actions to increase the modal share of the more sustainable forms of transport such as public transport, active mobility, and, as appropriate, inland waterway and maritime transport, and decrease the modal share and absolute use of less sustainable transport modes such as automotive vehicle use apart from public transport. It shall also include actions to
Amendment 1835 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 3 3. Integration of the different modes of transport: A SUMP shall promote multimodal accessible transport through the integration of the different modes and measures aimed at facilitating seamless and sustainable mobility. It shall include actions to increase the modal share of the more sustainable forms of transport such as public transport, active mobility, and, as appropriate, inland waterway and maritime transport. It shall also include actions to promote zero-emission mobility, in particular with regard to the
Amendment 1836 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 3 3. Integration of the different modes of transport: A SUMP shall promote multimodal accessible transport through the integration of the different modes and measures aimed at facilitating seamless and sustainable mobility. It shall include actions to increase the modal share of the more sustainable forms of transport such as public transport, active mobility, and, as appropriate, inland waterway and maritime transport. It shall also include actions to promote zero-emission mobility, in particular with regard to the greening of the urban fleet, to reduce congestion
Amendment 1837 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 4 4. Effective functioning of TEN-T: A SUMP should duly take into account the impact of various urban measures on the traffic flows, both passenger and freight, on the trans-European transport network with the aim to ensure seamless transit, bypass, or interconnection through and around the urban nodes, including of zero- emission vehicles and of active modes and electric micromobility. It shall in particular include actions to alleviate congestion, improve road safety and remove bottlenecks affecting the traffic flows on the TEN-T.
Amendment 1838 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 4 4. Effective functioning of TEN-T: A SUMP should duly take into account the impact of various urban measures on the traffic flows, both passenger and freight, on the trans-European transport network with the aim to ensure seamless transit, bypass, or interconnection through and around the urban nodes, including of carbon-neutral, low and zero-
Amendment 1839 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 4 4. Effective functioning of TEN-T: A SUMP should duly take into account the impact of various urban measures on the traffic flows, both passenger and freight, on the trans-European transport network with the aim to ensure seamless transit, bypass, or interconnection through and around the urban nodes, including of zero- emission vehicles. It shall in particular include actions to alleviate congestion, improve road safety and remove bottlenecks affecting the traffic flows on the TEN-T. In return TEN-T measures should take into account effects on regional and local traffic flows, both for passengers and freight.
Amendment 1840 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 4 a (new) 4 a. Safety and accessibility: A SUMP shall include a strategy to ensure that all trips in the urban area are safely reachable both by walking and cycling, and infrastructure to ensure this should be fully accessible for people using mobility aids. Wherever separation of active modes from motorised traffic is not feasible or justified, traffic speeds not exceeding 30 km/h shall be ensured. More space shall be devoted to pedestrians in the streets, particularly in urban centres and dense areas, with limitations to the motorised vehicles, except public transport, where appropriate, in order to reduce congestion and ensure safety and space for all ages and mobility needs. Pedestrian and cycling paths shall be separated into separate carriageways wherever feasible. The strategy shall include measures to ensure proper lighting of pedestrian and cycling paths, as well as plans to handle interruptions and hinders such as by construction or damages to the infrastructure, snow or icy conditions, to ensure full continued accessibility, also for people using mobility aids.
Amendment 1841 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 5 5. Participatory approach: The development and implementation of a SUMP shall be based on an integrated approach with a high level of cooperation, coordination and consultation between the different levels of government and relevant authorities
Amendment 1842 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 5 5. Participatory approach: The development and implementation of a SUMP shall be based on an integrated approach with a high level of cooperation, coordination and consultation between the different levels of government and relevant authorities
Amendment 1843 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 5 5. Participatory approach: The development and implementation of a SUMP shall be based on an integrated approach with a high level of cooperation, coordination and consultation between the different levels of government and relevant
Amendment 1844 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 5 5. Participatory approach: The development and implementation of a SUMP shall be based on an integrated approach with a high level of cooperation, coordination and consultation between the different levels of government and relevant authorities. Citizens, accessibility experts, as well as representatives of civil society and economic actors shall also be involved.
Amendment 1845 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 6 6. Monitoring and performance
Amendment 1846 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 6 6. Monitoring and performance indicators: A SUMP shall include objectives, targets and indicators underpinning the current and future performance of the urban transport system, at minimum, on greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and
Amendment 1847 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 6 6. Monitoring and performance indicators: A SUMP shall include objectives, targets and indicators underpinning the current and future performance of the urban transport system, at minimum, on greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access to mobility services, as well as data on air and noise pollution in
Amendment 1848 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 6 6. Monitoring and performance indicators: A SUMP shall include objectives, targets and indicators underpinning the current and future performance of the urban transport system, at minimum, on greenhouse gas emissions, improved management of traffic flows, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access to mobility services and infrastructure to all users, as well as data on air and noise pollution in cities. The implementation of a SUMP shall be monitored using performance indicators. Member States and the relevant authorities shall implement mechanisms to ensure that a SUMP is in line with the provisions of this Annex and of high quality.
Amendment 1849 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex VI – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point j Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 Annex – part III – point 1 (j) the thirty-fifth row with the title ‘Core network corridor “Scandinavian – Mediterranean”’ and the thirty-sixth row containing its alignment is deleted
source: 738.577
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
2024-06-29Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
| events/10 |
|
| events/11 |
|
| procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed |
2024-06-28Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
| events/10 |
|
| procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
2024-06-27Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
| events/10 |
|
| procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
2024-06-26Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
| events/10 |
|
| procedure/Other legal basis |
Old
Rules of Procedure EP 159New
Rules of Procedure EP 165 |
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
2024-06-25Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
| events/10 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
2024-06-24Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
| events/10 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
2024-06-23Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
| events/10 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
2024-06-22Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
| events/10 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
2024-06-21Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
| events/10 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
2024-06-20Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
| events/10 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
2024-06-19Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
| events/10 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
2024-06-18Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
| events/10 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Council's 1st reading positionNew
Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal |
2024-06-17Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
2024-06-16Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
2024-06-15Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
2024-06-14Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/9 |
|
2024-06-13Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
2024-06-08Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/8/summary |
|
2024-06-07Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/8/summary |
|
2024-06-06Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/8/summary |
|
2024-06-05Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/8/summary |
|
2024-06-04Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/8/summary |
|
2024-06-03Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/8/summary |
|
2024-06-02Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/8/summary |
|
2024-06-01Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/8/summary |
|
2024-05-31Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/8/summary |
|
2024-04-27Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/8 |
|
| forecasts |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
2024-04-26Show (4) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/18 |
|
| events/8 |
|
| forecasts |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
2024-04-25Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2024-04-24Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2024-04-23Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2024-04-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2024-04-21Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2024-04-20Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts/0 |
|
| forecasts/0 |
|
2024-03-06Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/17 |
|
| events/7/docs |
|
2024-02-16Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/7 |
|
2024-02-13Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/16 |
|
2024-02-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| forecasts |
|
2023-11-15Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/16/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
| docs/17/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
| docs/18/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
2023-05-09Show (13) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| docs/16 |
|
| docs/16/date |
Old
2023-03-21T00:00:00New
2023-03-20T00:00:00 |
| docs/17 |
|
| docs/17 |
|
| docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
| docs/18 |
|
| docs/18 |
|
| docs/18/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
| docs/19 |
|
| docs/20 |
|
| events/0 |
|
| events/4 |
|
2023-05-08Show (13) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| docs/16 |
|
| docs/17 |
|
| docs/17 |
|
| docs/18 |
|
| docs/18 |
|
| docs/18/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
| docs/19 |
|
| docs/19/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
| docs/20 |
|
| docs/20/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
| events/0 |
|
| events/4 |
|
2023-05-07Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/16 |
|
| events/4/summary |
|
2023-04-27Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-21T00:00:00New
2023-03-20T00:00:00 |
| docs/18/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
| docs/19/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
2023-04-26Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
| docs/18/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
| docs/19/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
2023-04-22Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-21T00:00:00New
2023-03-20T00:00:00 |
| docs/18/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
| docs/19/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
2023-04-21Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
| docs/18/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
| docs/19/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
2023-04-19Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/6 |
|
2023-04-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| events/5 |
|
2023-04-16Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/16/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0147_EN.html
|
| events/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0147_EN.html
|
2023-04-14Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/16 |
|
| events/4 |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
2023-04-13Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/16/date |
Old
2023-03-21T00:00:00New
2023-03-20T00:00:00 |
| docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
| docs/18/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
| events/2 |
|
| events/3 |
|
| procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
2023-04-12Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/16/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
| docs/17/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
| docs/18/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
2023-04-05Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/16/date |
Old
2023-03-21T00:00:00New
2023-03-20T00:00:00 |
| docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
| docs/18/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
2023-04-04Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/16/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
| docs/17/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
| docs/18/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
2023-03-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/16 |
|
2023-03-17Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/8 |
|
2023-03-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/5 |
|
2023-03-07Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/16 |
|
| docs/17 |
|
2023-03-04Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
2023-03-03Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
| procedure/Legislative priorities/0 |
|
2023-01-26Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/12 |
|
| docs/15 |
|
| docs/15/date |
Old
2022-11-22T00:00:00New
2023-01-25T00:00:00 |
2022-12-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
2022-12-21Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
2022-12-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/15/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-736359_EN.html
|
2022-12-06Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/14 |
|
| docs/15 |
|
| docs/15/date |
Old
2022-12-01T00:00:00New
2022-12-05T00:00:00 |
2022-12-05Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/9/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-738648_EN.html
|
| docs/10/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-738702_EN.html
|
| docs/11/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-738716_EN.html
|
| docs/13/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-738715_EN.html
|
| docs/14 |
|
| docs/15 |
|
2022-11-23Show (6) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/11 |
|
| docs/12 |
|
| docs/12 |
|
| docs/12/date |
Old
2022-11-17T00:00:00New
2022-11-22T00:00:00 |
| docs/13 |
|
| docs/13/date |
Old
2022-11-17T00:00:00New
2022-11-22T00:00:00 |
2022-11-19Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/11 |
|
| docs/12 |
|
| docs/13 |
|
2022-11-18Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/9 |
|
| docs/10 |
|
2022-10-17Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/8 |
|
2022-09-16Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/7/summary |
|
2022-09-08Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/parlements_nationaux/com/2021/0812/FR_SENATE_AVIS-COM(2021)0812_EN.pdf
|
2022-08-28Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/3/rapporteur |
|
| docs/7 |
|
2022-07-28Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| links |
|
2022-07-20Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
2022-07-19Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
2022-07-18Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-730131_EN.html
|
2022-07-14Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| docs/6 |
|
| events/0 |
|
2022-07-13Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
2022-07-12Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
2022-07-11Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
| procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
2022-06-23Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
2022-06-22Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| events/0 |
|
2022-06-19Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:6389)(documentyear:2021)(documentlanguage:EN)
|
2022-06-08Show (5) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| docs/5 |
|
| docs/5/date |
Old
2022-05-30T00:00:00New
2022-06-08T00:00:00 |
| docs/6 |
|
| events/0 |
|
2022-06-03Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/5 |
|
| docs/6 |
|
2022-05-23Show (2) Changes | Timetravel
| docs/0 |
|
| docs/0 |
|
2022-05-11Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/rapporteur |
|
2022-03-24Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
2022-03-15Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| events |
|
| procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
| procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
2022-03-09Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
2022-03-02Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
2022-02-19Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
2022-02-16Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/4/rapporteur |
|
2022-02-10Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/0/shadows |
|
2022-02-05Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/2/opinion |
False
|
2022-01-27Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| procedure/title |
Old
Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport networkNew
Trans-European transport network |
2022-01-22Show (1) Changes | Timetravel
| commission |
|
2022-01-21Show (3) Changes | Timetravel
| committees/1/opinion |
False
|
| committees/3/opinion |
False
|
| docs/0/docs/0 |
|
2021-12-28Show (1) Changes
| docs/0/summary |
|