Next event: Indicative plenary sitting date 2024/04/22 more...
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations 2024/02/14
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement 2024/02/09
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations 2024/02/09
- Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations confirmed by plenary (Rule 71) 2023/04/19
- Committee decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations announced in plenary (Rule 71) 2023/04/17
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading 2023/04/14
- Vote in committee, 1st reading 2023/04/13
- Committee decision to open interinstitutional negotiations with report adopted in committee 2023/04/13
- Contribution 2023/03/21
- Contribution 2023/03/01
- Contribution 2023/03/01
- Amendments tabled in committee 2023/01/25
- Committee opinion 2022/12/05
- Amendments tabled in committee 2022/12/01
- Amendments tabled in committee 2022/11/22
- Amendments tabled in committee 2022/11/17
- Amendments tabled in committee 2022/11/16
- Amendments tabled in committee 2022/11/16
- Committee of the Regions: opinion 2022/10/11
- Committee draft report 2022/10/10
- PANZA Alessandro (ID) appointed as rapporteur in REGI 2022/08/26
- Supplementary legislative basic document 2022/07/27
Progress: Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading
Role | Committee | Rapporteur | Shadows |
---|---|---|---|
Lead | TRAN | THALER Barbara ( EPP), RIQUET Dominique ( Renew) | GARCÍA MUÑOZ Isabel ( S&D), DALUNDE Jakop G. ( Verts/ALE), CAMPOMENOSI Marco ( ID), ZĪLE Roberts ( ECR), KOUNTOURA Elena ( GUE/NGL) |
Committee Opinion | BUDG | ||
Committee Opinion | ENVI | ||
Committee Opinion | ITRE | ||
Committee Opinion | IMCO | DE MEO Salvatore ( EPP) | Carlo FIDANZA ( ECR), Kateřina KONEČNÁ ( GUE/NGL), Christel SCHALDEMOSE ( S&D), Claudia GAMON ( RE) |
Committee Opinion | REGI | PANZA Alessandro ( ID) | Bronis ROPĖ ( Verts/ALE), Susana SOLÍS PÉREZ ( RE), Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA ( PPE), Vera TAX ( S&D) |
Lead committee dossier:
Events
The Committee on Transport and Tourism adopted the report by Barbara THALER (EPP, AT) and Dominique RIQUET (Renew Europe, FR) on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 and Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulation (EU) 1315/2013.
The committee responsible recommended that the European Parliament's position adopted at first reading under the ordinary legislative procedure should amend the proposal as follows:
Objectives of the trans-European transport network
According to Members, the trans-European transport network should strengthen the social, economic and territorial cohesion of the Union and contribute to the creation of a single European transport area which is sustainable, efficient and resilient and which increases the benefits for its users and supports inclusive growth. It should demonstrate European added value by contributing to:
(a) sustainability through: (i) the contribution to the deployment of decarbonisation technologies, including through alternative fuels infrastructure, and optimisation of synergies; (ii) promotion of active modes infrastructure;
(b) efficiency through: (i) the interoperability of European, national, regional and local transport networks through common European technical and operational rules and standards, technical equipment requirements, staff certification, including such as the use of a single Union-wide language for cross-border rail transport; (ii) optimisation of the capacity of the rail network; (iii) continuous and efficient maintenance programmes ; (iv) greater coordination on infrastructure works between Member State for cross-border projects; (v) eliminating bottle-necks sections, in particular for cross-border links.
Resource-efficient, resilient network and environmental protection
The trans-European transport network should be planned, developed and operated in a resource-efficient way, complying with the applicable Union and national environmental requirements, through: (i) the development and application of common European rules for implementation of common projects especially in cross border sections; (ii) the optimisation of infrastructure integration and interconnection in order to foster multimodality ; (iii) the taking into account of possible synergies with other networks, including active modes, in particular the transEuropean energy or telecommunication networks including the whole electric grid in order to ensure consistency between the recharge infrastructure planning and the respective grid planning; (iv) synergies with the EuroVelo network or network identified in EU Military Requirements for Military Mobility.
Sustainable transport
The report advocated for unified technical and operational standards for each transport mode and stressed that intermodal transport should be primarily done by rail, inland waterways or short-sea shipping, while any initial and/or final legs can be carried out by road. This should translate into fully electrified railways in the core TEN-T network, running with at least of 160 km/h passenger and 100 km/h cargo trains , which could cross internal EU borders in less than 15 minutes by the end of 2030.
Cooperation with third countries
The report noted that the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MMF) 2028-2035, a budget envelope dedicated to “external transport” should be created in the CEF III, in order to increase cooperation with third countries in terms of cross-border projects and infrastructure deployment. That new financial envelope shall be at least 30 % of the amount of the current CEF programme and should be provided under Heading 5 (Security and Defence) and Heading 6 (Neighbourhood and the world) of the MFF.
General priorities for the European Transport Corridors
In the development of the European Transport Corridors, general priority should be given to measures that are necessary for: (i) the deployment of ICT systems on all modes on the network in order to ensure an efficient use of the infrastructure; (ii) the improvement of connections between the trans-European transport network and the infrastructure networks of neighbouring countries, as well as the improvement of trans European transport infrastructure on the territory of neighbouring countries.
Urban nodes requirements
Given the import role played by urban nodes, Members set out provisions to ensure that capacity bottlenecks and insufficient connectivity within urban nodes do not hamper multimodality along the TEN-T, while fully taking into account the divers challenges of each urban node and the principle of subsidiarity.
Lastly, Member States are called on to adopt sustainable urban mobility plans by the end of 2025 to integrate different transport modes, including cycling or active mobility, reduce congestion and improve road safety. This plan should become one of the conditions to get EU funding.
The Commission presented this amended proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 and Regulation (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulation (EU) 1315/2013.
As a reminder, Regulation (EU) 1315/2013 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network (TEN-T) sets out a European-wide multimodal network of railways, inland waterways and short-sea shipping routes which are linked to urban nodes, maritime and inland ports, airports and terminals across the European Union. The network provides a solid foundation towards building the arteries that are needed for smooth passenger and freight transport flows in and across Europe.
To help tackle the increasing challenges of climate change and the need for greater resilience of the Union’s transport infrastructure following the crippling effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Commission adopted on 14 December 2021 a legislative proposal which revises the TEN-T Regulation of 2013. However, since the adoption of the revised guidelines, the resilience of the European transport network has been put to the test yet again by the devastating impact of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. This has redefined the geopolitical landscape, bringing to the surface our vulnerability to unforeseen disruptive events beyond the Union’s borders. Its major impacts on global markets, such as global food security, has highlighted the fact that the Union’s internal market and its transport network cannot be viewed in isolation when it comes to shaping Union policy. Better connections with the EU neighbouring partner countries are more than ever needed.
CONTENT: the present amended proposal aims to introduce the following changes to the legislative proposal of 14 December 2021:
- as an immediate response to the requested action communicated in the ‘Solidarity Lanes’ Communication, an extension of four European Transport Corridors to Ukraine and Moldova is proposed, based on the indicative maps of the core network in these two countries. This regards notably an extension of the North-Sea Baltic Corridor via Lviv and Kyiv to Mariupol, the extension of the Baltic-Black-Aegean Sea Corridor to Odesa via Lviv and via Chişinău as well as an extension of the Baltic Sea-Adriatic Sea and the Rhine-Danube Corridors to Lviv;
- in view of the current geopolitical context, an orientation towards and expansion of the trans-European transport network in Russia and Belarus is no longer valid or desirable. It is therefore proposed to remove the indicative maps of the trans European transport network in Russia and Belarus from Annex IV. However, in case of a democratic transition in Belarus building and upgrading the country’s cross border connections with the EU in line with the comprehensive economic plan for a democratic Belarus would be a high priority, including through re-inclusion of the country back in the Regulation;
- improved cross-border connections to Russia and Belarus are no longer of high priority on the territory of EU Member States. Connections currently exist from Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland to these two third countries. To reflect the lesser priority in building and upgrading those ‘last-mile’ connections, it is proposed to downgrade the last miles of all cross-border connections currently on the core network to the comprehensive network for which only a later deadline of implementation of 2050 is provided for;
- lastly, several Member States have a railway network with a different nominal track gauge than the European standard nominal track gauge of 1 435 mm. The countries concerned are Ireland (1 600 mm gauge), Finland (1 524 mm gauge), Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania (1 520 mm gauge) and Portugal and Spain (1 668 mm gauge). Such differences in railway track gauge considerably restrict rail interoperability across the European Union as has been demonstrated by the current crisis in Ukraine and its problems in exporting grains by rail due to its different track gauge. It is therefore proposed, for all Member States with a land rail connection with other Member States, to include a requirement to develop all new TEN-T railway lines with a European standard nominal track gauge of 1 435 mm and also to develop a migration plan towards this European standard nominal track gauge for all existing lines of the European Transport Corridors.
PURPOSE: to revise the trans-European transport network guidelines to align them with the European Green Deal objectives and the climate targets of the EU Climate Law.
PROPOSED ACT: Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ROLE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT: the European Parliament decides in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure and on an equal footing with the Council.
BACKGROUND: the TEN-T is an EU-wide network of rail, inland waterways, short-sea shipping routes, and roads. It connects 424 major cities with ports, airports and railway terminals. Transport emissions represent around 25% of the EU’s total greenhouse gas emissions, and these emissions have increased over recent years. The European Green Deal therefore calls for a 90% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from transport in order for the Union to become a climate-neutral economy by 2050, while working towards the zero-pollution ambition.
The proposed TEN-T revision seeks to build a reliable, seamless and high quality trans-European transport network which ensures sustainable connectivity throughout the European Union without physical gaps, bottlenecks or missing links by 2050. This network will contribute to the good functioning of the internal market, to the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the EU territory and to the European Green Deal objectives. It should be gradually developed in steps, with intermediate deadlines in 2030 and 2040.
CONTENT: the proposed regulation establishes revised guidelines for the development of a trans-European transport network consisting of the comprehensive network and of the core and extended core network, the two latter being established on the basis of the comprehensive network. It identifies: (a) European Transport Corridors of highest strategic importance on the basis of priority sections of the trans-European transport network; (b) projects of common interest and specifies the requirements to be complied with for the development and implementation of the infrastructure of the trans-European transport network.
The main changes made by the proposal compared to the 2013 Regulation concern the following:
- high infrastructure standards for all modes applied throughout the entire network;
- a new intermediary deadline of 2040 to advance the completion of major parts of the network ahead of the 2050 deadline that applies to the wider, comprehensive network;
- stronger synergies between infrastructure planning and the operation of transport services. Examples include higher speeds for train services across the TEN-T network ( 160 kilometres per hour for passenger services and 100 kilometres per hour for freight ), maximum waiting times at borders of 15 minutes for rail freight. Another example is guaranteed good navigation status per river basin on the inland waterways on the TEN-T network;
- requirements for the deployment, across the TEN-T network, of the charging and refuelling infrastructure needed for alternative transport fuels. This would mean sufficient charging capacity for cars, vans and trucks at 60 kilometres distance in each direction by 2025 on the core network and by 2030 for the extended core and comprehensive networks;
- providing safe and secure parking areas for commercial drivers, equipped with alternative fuels infrastructure;
- use of innovative technologies like 5G to further advance the digitalisation of transport infrastructure, further increasing efficiency, and improving the safety, security and resilience of the network;
- increased resilience of the TEN-T network to natural and human-made disasters and efficient and fast deployment of emergency and rescue services, including for persons with disabilities or reduced mobility;
- the requirement for 424 major cities on the TEN-T network to have sustainable urban mobility plans by 2025, to align their mobility developments on the TEN-T network;
- more transhipment hubs and multimodal passenger terminals in cities to facilitate multimodality, in particular for the last mile of a passenger or freight journey;
- connect large airports to rail , where possible high-speed rail;
- making it possible network-wide for lorries to be transported by trains.
Annexes
The proposal revises the annexes to contain detailed maps of the core, extended core and the comprehensive network, lists of transport and urban nodes in the scope of this Regulation as well as the definition of alignment and maps of the European Transport Corridors. It furthermore contains indicative maps for the neighbouring countries .
Budgetary implications
The administrative costs relative to the baseline have been estimated as being moderate. Expressed as present value over 2021-2050, administrative costs for the public authorities have been estimated at EUR 25.4 million (i.e. EUR 15.8 million for the European Commission and EUR 9.6 million for Member States public authorities).
In addition, the largest part of investments is estimated to originate from public funding (national public funds, EU funds) and would amount to EUR 244.2 billion relative to the baseline, expressed as present value over 2021-2050.
Documents
- Approval in committee of the text agreed at 1st reading interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.003
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2024)000889
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.003
- Committee report tabled for plenary, 1st reading: A9-0147/2023
- Contribution: COM(2022)0384
- Contribution: COM(2022)0384
- Contribution: COM(2021)0812
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.577
- Committee opinion: PE736.359
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE739.613
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.715
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.716
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.648
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.702
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR1228/2022
- Committee draft report: PE736.593
- Supplementary legislative basic document: COM(2022)0384
- Committee opinion: PE730.131
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES6389/2021
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2021)0435
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2021)0472
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2021)0473
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SWD(2021)0471
- Legislative proposal published: COM(2021)0812
- Legislative proposal published: EUR-Lex
- Document attached to the procedure: SEC(2021)0435
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0472
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0473
- Document attached to the procedure: EUR-Lex SWD(2021)0471
- Economic and Social Committee: opinion, report: CES6389/2021
- Committee opinion: PE730.131
- Supplementary legislative basic document: COM(2022)0384
- Committee draft report: PE736.593
- Committee of the Regions: opinion: CDR1228/2022
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.648
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.702
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.716
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.715
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE739.613
- Committee opinion: PE736.359
- Amendments tabled in committee: PE738.577
- Coreper letter confirming interinstitutional agreement: GEDA/A/(2024)000889
- Text agreed during interinstitutional negotiations: PE759.003
- Contribution: COM(2022)0384
- Contribution: COM(2022)0384
- Contribution: COM(2021)0812
Activities
- Dominique RIQUET
Plenary Speeches (0)
- Barbara THALER
Plenary Speeches (0)
Amendments | Dossier |
215 |
2021/0420(COD)
2022/05/06
IMCO
91 amendments...
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (i a) improving active modes infrastructure and removing existing barriers for active modes.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (e a) does not constitute a barrier to active modes; at least twice as many safe, accessible and comfortable crossings across the line tracks shall be provided for active modes as for motorised vehicles.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. Member States shall ensure that the railway infrastructure of the extended core network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), by 31 December 204
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 2 When constructing or upgrading a passenger line of the extended core network or sections thereof, Member States shall perform a study to analyse the feasibility and economic relevance of higher speeds, and build or upgrade the line to such higher speed where its feasibility and economic relevance are demonstrated. The study shall also take into account the potential impact on passengers during the constructing or upgrading phase.
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 2 When constructing or upgrading a passenger line of the extended core network or sections thereof, Member States shall
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 – point b a (new) (b a) Until 31 December 2040, in Member States where no separate lines for rail passenger and rail freight transport are available, as a derogation from Article 15(2), point (d), Member States are considered to enable, without special permission, the operation of freight trains with a train length of at least 740 m (including the locomotive(s)) if at least the following conditions are complied with: (i) on double track lines, at least 50% of the train paths for freight trains per day, and not less than two train paths on average per hour and direction, can be allocated to freight trains with a length of at least 740 m; (ii) on single track lines, at least one train path per two hours and direction can be allocated to freight trains with a length of at least 740 m.
Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – introductory part 1. Member States shall ensure that on the railway infrastructure of the extended core network and the comprehensive network, including connections referred to in Article 14(1), point (d), by 31 December 204
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped, while ensuring a synchronised and harmonised ERTMS deployment trackside and on board of trains;
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 18 Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – introductory part In the promotion of projects of common interest related to railway infrastructure, and where relevant, in addition to the general priorities set out in Articles 12 and 13, attention shall be given to the following:
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) when building or upgrading railway infrastructure, ensure the continuity and accessibility of pedestrian a
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) providing accessible active modes infrastructure alongside rail lines and within civil engineering structures such as bridges or tunnels.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Member States shall ensure that rivers and canals do not constitute barriers to active modes; at least twice as many safe, accessible and comfortable crossings across the inland waterway shall be provided for active modes as for motorised vehicles.
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) providing accessible active modes infrastructure alongside inland waterways and within civil engineering structures such as bridges.
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point k a (new) (k a) dual use infrastructure utilised for activities such as military mobility.
Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 25 – paragraph 2 – point a (a) maritime ports of the comprehensive network will be connected with the rail
Amendment 116 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) introduction and promotion of new technologies and innovation for zero and low carbon energy fuels and propulsion systems, including LNG;
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) improve the resilience of the logistic chains
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a – point x a (new) (x a) infrastructure for active modes such pedestrian and cycle tracks, bridges or tunnels, including alternative routes for active modes.
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point f Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (h a) active modes infrastructure is integrated in or provided as an alternative to the road network.
Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) rest areas are available at a maximum distance of 60 km from each other, providing sufficient parking space, relevant safety and security equipment, and appropriate facilities, including sanitary facilities, that meet the needs of a diverse workforce;
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) safe and secure parking areas are available at
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) active modes infrastructure is integrated in or provided as an alternative to the road;
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point d b (new) (d b) the road does not constitute a barrier to active modes; at least twice as many safe, accessible and comfortable crossings across the road shall be provided for active modes as for motorised vehicles; in and next to built-up areas the distance between crossings for active modes shall not exceed 400 m.
Amendment 125 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 30 – paragraph 5 a (new) 5 a. The Commission shall, by 31 December 2025, review and identify the needs for specific road infrastructure adjustments on the core network in order to facilitate the use of European Modular System vehicles.
Amendment 126 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) mitigation of congestion on existing roads, in particular through improving active modes infrastructure such as cycle highways, intelligent traffic management, including dynamic congestion charges or tolls varied based on the time of day, week or season;
Amendment 127 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) when building or upgrading road infrastructure, ensure the continuity and accessibility of pedestrian and cycling
Amendment 128 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) when building or upgrading road infrastructure, ensure the
Amendment 129 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) providing accessible active modes infrastructure within civil engineering structures such as bridges or tunnels.
Amendment 130 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 35 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Within t
Amendment 131 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) adoption and publication of a sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP) in line with Annex V that includes notably measures to integrate the different modes of transport, to promote efficient zero- emission mobility including sustainable and zero-emission urban logistics, to reduce air and noise pollution and that takes long-distance trans-European transport flows into consideration;
Amendment 132 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) collection
Amendment 133 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii a (new) (ii a) all destinations within the urban node to be safely reachable by active modes of transport;
Amendment 134 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) by 31 December 2040: the development of at least one multimodal freight terminal allowing for sufficient transhipment capacity within or in the
Amendment 135 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) compliance with the adopted sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs).
Amendment 136 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter IV – title Amendment 137 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) improve the safety and sustainability of the movement of persons, services and of the transport of goods;
Amendment 138 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) introduce dual use technology, security technology and compatible identification standards on the networks;
Amendment 139 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 2 2. Projects of common interest for which an environmental impact assessment must be carried out in compliance with Directive 2011/92/UE
Amendment 140 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Member States shall guarantee the continued functioning of supply chains and essential travel along the TEN-T and avoid possible shortages, where necessary through the activation of “Green Lanes” in strict cooperation with the European Coordinators.
Amendment 141 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall make best effort to ensure that the information notified pursuant to paragraph 1 is made available at least twelve months before the final decision on the implementation of the project of common interest. The information shall in particular include:
Amendment 142 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 No later than thirty calendar days, unless agreed otherwise between Member State and the Commission, following the receipt of information pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission may request additional information from the Member State where the project of common interest is planned. Any request for additional information shall be duly justified, limited to information necessary to carry out the assessment pursuant to paragraph 5, proportionate to the purpose of the request and not unduly burdensome for the Member State where the project of common interest is planned.
Amendment 143 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) any maintenance work that results in a limitation or non-availability of rail infrastructure is managed in accordance with Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/20751a. __________________ 1a Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/2075 of 4 September 2017 replacing Annex VII to Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a single European railway area (OJ L 295, 14.11.2017, p. 69–73)
Amendment 144 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 1. Transport infrastructure shall allow seamless mobility and accessibility for all users, in particular
Amendment 145 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 Transport infrastructure shall allow seamless mobility and accessibility for all users, in particular people in situations of vulnerability including persons with disabilities or reduced mobility, older persons as well as persons living in outermost regions and other remote, rural, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas.
Amendment 146 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 a (new) Member States shall carry out ex-ante assessments of the accessibility of infrastructure and of the services connected to it.
Amendment 147 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 b (new) The design, construction, maintenance, and upgrade of transport infrastructure shall comply with Annex I and Annex III of Directive (EU) 2019/882, and accessibility requirements laid down in other relevant Union law.
Amendment 148 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 c (new) Without prejudice to the Connecting Europe Facility, InvestEU, the Recovery and Resilience Facility, Cohesion Policy, European Regional Development Fund, Horizon Europe and other financing instruments established under Union law or by the European Investment Bank, as well as relevant provisions of this Regulation, Member States shall ensure that public investments for the development, maintenance and upgrading of TEN-T infrastructure are not used to create further access barriers for passengers or otherwise contradict the requirements set out in paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of this Article. Member States shall further allocate targeted funds for the purpose of improving accessibility of existing TEN-T infrastructure for all passengers.
Amendment 149 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) focus on improving accessibility in European transport corridors for all users
Amendment 150 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator may consult regional and local authorities, infrastructure managers, transport operators, in particular those which are members of the rail freight governance, the supply industry, transport users, accessibility experts and representatives of civil society in relation to the work plan and its implementation. In addition, the European Coordinator responsible for ERTMS shall closely cooperate with the European Union Agency for Railways and Europe's Rail Joint Undertaking and the European Coordinator for the European Maritime Space with the European Maritime Safety Agency.
Amendment 151 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new) (f a) an analysis of the future-proofness of the infrastructure for allowing seamless and accessible mobility to all users, in view of demographic changes, including but not limited to ageing demographics and increasing number of persons with reduced mobility, urbanisation, and migration and travel patterns in the Union, and, where appropriate, proposed measures to future- proof accessibility and interoperability of the network and connected service;
Amendment 152 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 4 a (new) 4 a. In case of disputes between Member States, among which unilateral actions resulting into blocking or restricting the free movements of goods and/or services, the responsible European Coordinator should work with the Member States as a mediator in order to promote the activation and management of alternative rail or road routes.
Amendment 153 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 1 1. Based on the first work plan of the European Coordinators, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act for each work plan of the cross-border European Transport Corridors and the two horizontal priorities. This implementing act shall set out the priorities for infrastructure and investment planning and for funding.
Amendment 154 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 54 – paragraph 4 4. Until full implementation of the measures provided for in the implementing act, the Member States concerned shall communicate to the Commission a
Amendment 155 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall inform the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress made in implementing projects of common interest and the investments made for that purpose. This information shall include the yearly transmission of data through the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans-European transport network (TENtec). It shall include technical and financial data concerning projects of common interest on the trans-European transport network, data related to accessibility of the TEN-T infrastructure and passenger services as well as data on the completion and maintenance of the trans-
Amendment 156 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall inform the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress
Amendment 157 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 3 Amendment 158 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 3 3. Member States shall ensure the quality, completeness, accessibility and consistency of
Amendment 159 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 National procedures regarding the involvement and consultation of regional and local authorities
Amendment 160 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 Amendment 161 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 3 Amendment 162 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – title Delay in completion of the core network, the extended core network and the comprehensive network or lack of its maintenance
Amendment 163 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 1 1. In the event of significant delay in starting or completing work on the core network, extended core network and on the comprehensive network compared to the initial timeline set in implementing acts in accordance with Article 54 or defined in national transport and investment plans or other relevant project documentation or if there is evidence of non-compliance with the maintenance provisions in Article 48, the Commission may ask the Member State or Member States concerned to provide the reasons for the delay or lack of maintenance. Such reasons shall be provided by the Member State or Member States within three months of the request.
Amendment 164 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 2 2. In case the delayed or non- maintained section concerns a European Transport Corridor, the European Coordinator shall be involved in view of resolving the problem.
Amendment 165 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 The Commission may, after considering the reasons provided by the Member State or Member States concerned pursuant to the first subparagraph, adopt a decision addressed to the Member State or Member States concerned, finding that the significant delay in starting or completing the work on the core network, extended
Amendment 166 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 Amendment 167 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 62 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2 In case the delayed or non-maintained section concerns a project supported with Union funds under direct management, a reduction of the amount of the grant and/or an amendment or termination of the grant agreement may be initiated in accordance with the
Amendment 168 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex II – Table RAIL ROAD
Amendment 169 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex V – point 1 1. Goals and objectives: A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) shall have as central goal improving accessibility of the functional urban area and providing high- quality, safe and sustainable low-emission mobility to, through and within the functional urban area. It shall notably support zero-emission mobility and the implementation of an urban transport system which contributes to a better overall performance of the trans-European transport network, in particular through the development of infrastructure for the seamless circulation of zero-emission vehicles as well as of multimodal passenger hubs to facilitate first and last mile connections and of multimodal freight terminals serving urban nodes. A SUMP shall also take into consideration commuter journeys to and from the urban area.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The planning, development and operation of the trans-European transport network should enable sustainable forms of transport, provide for improved multimodal and interoperable transport solutions and for an enhanced intermodal integration of the entire logistic chain, thereby contributing to a smooth functioning of the internal market by creating the arteries that are necessary for smooth passenger and freight transport flows across the Union. In addition, the network should aim at strengthening economic, social and territorial cohesion by ensuring accessibility and connectivity for all regions of the Union, including a better connectivity of the outermost regions and other remote, rural, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas. The development of the trans-European transport network should also enable seamless, safe and sustainable mobility of goods and persons in all their diversity, and should contribute to further passenger rights and price transparency as well as economic growth and competitiveness in a global perspective, by establishing interconnections and interoperability between national transport networks in a resource-efficient and sustainable way to the benefit of the passenger.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 9 a (new) (9 a) Active modes infrastructure should be improved and existing barriers for active modes removed throughout the TEN-T network. Active modes, such as walking and cycling, contribute to the European Union’s climate goals, improve public health, provide economic benefits and alleviate congestion on the road and rail network.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes, the development, maintenance and upgrading of the trans-
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10 a) As signatories to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), the European Union and all Member States are legally obliged to ensure that persons with disabilities have access, on an equal basis with others, to transport and the built environment (Article 9). Acknowledging that millions of persons with disabilities experience barriers to use transport, the European Commission has included the revision of the TEN-T Guidelines in its list of actions under aim 2. “Accessibility – an enabler of rights, autonomy and equality” of the Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030. Finally, with its Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, the EU has committed to “making mobility fair and just for all” (Flagship 9), including by improving accessibility for passengers with disabilities. It notes that transport proposals under the Strategy must be compliant with the Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 13 Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 a (new) (24 a) The cross-border use of the “European Modular System” is essential to improve the efficiency and environmental impact of the road freight transport and ensure that Union’s sustainability and emission objectives are reached
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) The trans-European transport network should ensure efficient multimodality in order to allow better and more sustainable modal choices to be made for passengers and freight and in order to enable large volumes to be consolidated for transfers over long distances. Multimodal terminals should play a key role to meet this objective. The design and construction of transport infrastructure should comply with the relevant requirements laid down in national law and Union law.
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) As an effective single framework
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 60 (60) Publicly accessible recharging infrastructure along the trans-European transport network as defined in Regulation (EU) […] [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure] should be complemented with requirements on the deployment of recharging infrastructure in multimodal terminals and for multimodal passenger hubs, to provide charging opportunities for long haul trucks when they are being loaded or unloaded or when the driver is taking a rest or for busses in multimodal passenger hubs. In order to ensure free circulation, where the terminals
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) Taking stock of the experience with regard to the crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic25 and in order to avoid traffic disruptions and contingencies in future, Member States should take into account the security and resilience of the transport infrastructure to climate change, natural hazards, human-made disasters and other disruptions affecting the functioning of the Union transport system, when planning infrastructure. To that aim, a permanent and automatic mechanism for activating “Green Lanes” should be established along internal borders of the Trans-European Transport Network. Moreover, the European Transport Corridors should also include important diversionary lines which can be used in case of congestion or other problems on the principal routes. In addition, due to their multimodal nature, one mode can substitute the other in case of emergencies. __________________ 25 Communication on the implementation
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 a (new) (67 a) In the context of the structured dialogue with regional and local authorities and all stakeholders involved, European Coordinators should be able to take measures to discourage any form of unilateral cross-border blockades along the network, and to strengthen TEN-T sanctioning and governance instruments, as to avoid blocking border transit at the core nodes and to ensure the activation and management of alternative rail or road routes.
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 70 (70) The technical basis of the maps specifying the trans-European transport network is provided by the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans-European transport network (TENtec). Member States should also provide data on accessibility and maintenance to improve public scrutiny.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z (z) ‘maritime port’ means an area of land and water made up of such infrastructure and equipment so as to permit, principally, the reception of waterborne vessels, their loading and unloading, the storage of goods, the receipt and delivery or further transmission of those goods and the embarkation and disembarkation of
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point an a (new) (an a) ‘European Modular System’ means a combination of existing loading units (modules) in vehicle combinations or road trains which can exceed the length of 18,75 m and gross combined weight of 40,000 kg.
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point i (i) promotion of zero-emission mobility, including active modes, in line with the relevant Union CO2 reduction targets;
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point vi a (new) (vi a) ensuring seamless travel experience for consumers, including extensive protection of passenger rights and price transparency as well as free competition allowing for a wide choice of services
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) the taking into account of possible synergies with other networks, in particular the trans-European energy or telecommunication networks, or EuroVelo, the European cycle route network;
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 3 3. The environmental assessment of plans and projects shall be carried out in accordance with Council Directive 92/43/EEC49 , Directives 2000/60/EC50 , 2001/42/EC51 , 2002/49/EC52 , 2009/147/EC53 and 2011/92/EU of the
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission may require Member States by means of an implementing act to establish a single entity for the construction and management of cross-border infrastructure projects of common interest. The relevant European Coordinator shall have the status of observer in the management or supervisory board or in both of that single entity. If a single unit for construction and management is established of cross- border infrastructure, they should be mandated to promote and monitor accessibility through TEN-T projects.
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission may re
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 9 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new) (h a) improve active modes infrastructure and remove existing barriers for active modes.
source: 731.753
2022/07/12
IMCO
124 amendments...
Amendment 1 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 (4) The realisation of the trans- European transport network creates the enabling conditions in terms of infrastructure basis allowing to make all transport modes more sustainable, accessible, affordable and inclusive, to make sustainable alternatives widely available in a multimodal transport system and to put in place the right incentives to drive the transition, notably by ensuring a fair transition, in line with the objectives presented in the Council Recommendation (EU) […] of […] on ensuring a fair transition towards climate neutrality.
Amendment 10 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 18 (18) The trans-European transport network should be gradually developed in three steps with the overall aim to realise a multimodal and interoperable European wide network of high quality standards, while ensuring the smooth functioning of the internal market and respecting the overall Union climate neutrality and environmental objectives: the completion of a core network by 2030, of an extended core network by 2040 and of the comprehensive network by 2050.
Amendment 100 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 a (new) Particular attention shall be paid by the Member States to the protection of workers during the building phase of infrastructures.
Amendment 101 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 46 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Member States shall ensure the continued functioning of supply chains and essential travel along the TEN-T and avoid possible shortages, where necessary through the activation of "Green Lanes" in strict cooperation with the European Coordinators.
Amendment 102 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 47 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Member States shall ensure that the information notified pursuant to paragraph 1 is made available at least
Amendment 103 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 48 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) any maintenance work that results in a limitation or non availability of rail infrastructure is managed in accordance with Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/20751a. _________________ 1a Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2017/2075 of 4 September 2017 replacing Annex VII to Directive 2012/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a single European railway area (OJ L 295, 14.11.2017, p. 69-73).
Amendment 104 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 1. Transport infrastructure shall allow seamless mobility and accessibility for all users, in particular people in situations of vulnerability including persons with disabilities or reduced mobility as well as persons living in outermost regions and other remote, rural, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas.
Amendment 105 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 b (new) Amendment 106 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 49 – paragraph 1 a (new) 1a. Member States shall carry out ex ante assessments of the accessibility of infrastructure and of the services connected to it.
Amendment 107 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) focus on improving accessibility in European transport corridors for all users;
Amendment 108 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 50 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) focus on improving accessibility in European transport corridors for all users;
Amendment 109 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 4 4. The consultative Forum for the horizontal priorities shall be established and chaired by the European Coordinator. The Member States concerned
Amendment 11 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 21 (21) The comprehensive network should be sufficiently equipped with alternative fuels infrastructures that are accessible to users in order to ensure that it effectively supports the transition to zero-emission mobility, in line with the milestones set in the Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy
Amendment 110 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 4 4. The consultative Forum for the horizontal priorities shall be established and chaired by the European Coordinator. The Member States concerned
Amendment 111 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator may consult regional and local authorities, infrastructure managers, transport operators, in particular those which are members of the rail freight governance, the supply industry, transport users, accessibility experts and representatives of civil society in relation to the work plan and its implementation. In addition, the European Coordinator responsible for ERTMS shall closely cooperate with the European Union Agency for Railways and Europe's Rail Joint Undertaking and the European Coordinator for the European Maritime Space with the European Maritime Safety Agency.
Amendment 112 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 52 – paragraph 6 6. The European Coordinator may consult regional and local authorities, infrastructure managers, transport
Amendment 113 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 3 – point f a (new) (f a) an analysis of the future proofness of the infrastructure for allowing seamless and accessible mobility to all users, and, where appropriate, proposed measures to future proof accessibility and interoperability of the network and connected service;
Amendment 114 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 53 – paragraph 4 a (new) Amendment 115 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 55 – paragraph 1 1. Member States shall inform the Commission on a regular, comprehensive and transparent basis about the progress made in implementing projects of common interest and the investments made for that purpose. This information shall include the yearly transmission of data through the interactive geographical and technical information system for the trans-European transport network (TENtec). It shall include technical and financial data concerning projects of common interest on the trans-European transport network, data related to accessibility of the TEN-T infrastructure and passenger services, where applicable, as well as data on the completion and maintenance of the trans- European transport network.
Amendment 116 #
3. Member States shall ensure the quality, completeness, accessibility and consistency of the data in the TENtec information system. The national systems and data sources shall allow for an automated data exchange with TENtec.
Amendment 117 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part Subject to the second paragraph of Article 172 TFEU, the Commission shall be empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 60 to amend Annexes I and II, notably to take account of possible changes resulting from the quantitative thresholds laid down in Articles 20, 24 and 32 or changes in terms of security. When adapting those Annexes, the Commission shall:
Amendment 118 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 56 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) include new infrastructure and urban nodes in the trans-European transport network if they are considered of high importance to ensure military mobility and food security within the Union;
Amendment 119 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 57 – paragraph 1 National procedures regarding the involvement and consultation of regional and local authorities
Amendment 12 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 (24) The core network with a deadline of 2030 and the extended core network with a deadline of 2040 should constitute the foundation of the sustainable multimodal transport network, representing the strategically most important nodes and links of the trans-European transport network, according to traffic needs. They should stimulate the development of the entire comprehensive network and enable Union action to concentrate on those components of the trans-European transport network with the highest European added value, in particular cross- border sections, missing links, multimodal connecting points, freight terminals and major bottlenecks.
Amendment 120 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 58 – paragraph 3 Amendment 121 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 61 – paragraph 3 a (new) 3 a. When conducting the review process, the Commission shall also evaluate, in consultation with the Member States, the creation of a new southern European Transport Corridor connecting the east and west sides of the Mediterranean sea.
Amendment 122 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 1 1. Goals and objectives: A Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP) shall have as central goal improving accessibility of the functional urban area and providing high- quality, safe and sustainable low-emission mobility to, through and within the functional urban area for passengers and freight. It shall notably support zero- emission mobility and the implementation of an urban transport system which contributes to a better overall performance of the trans-European transport network, in particular through the development of infrastructure for the seamless circulation of zero-emission vehicles as well as of multimodal passenger hubs to facilitate first and last mile connections and of multimodal freight terminals serving urban nodes. A SUMP shall also take into consideration commuter journeys to and from the urban area.
Amendment 123 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 3 3. Integration of the different modes of transport: A SUMP shall promote multimodal transport through the integration of the different modes and measures aimed at facilitating seamless and sustainable mobility. It shall include actions to increase the modal share of the more sustainable forms of transport such as public transport, active mobility, and, as appropriate, air-transport, inland waterway and maritime transport. It shall also include actions to promote zero-emission mobility, in particular with regard to the greening of the urban fleet, to reduce congestion and to improve road safety in particular of
Amendment 124 #
Proposal for a regulation Annex I – point 6 6. Monitoring and performance indicators: A SUMP shall include objectives, targets and indicators underpinning the current and future performance of the urban transport system, at minimum, on greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access to mobility services, as well as data on air and noise pollution in cities. The implementation of a SUMP shall be monitored using performance indicators. Member States and the relevant authorities shall implement mechanisms to ensure that a SUMP is in line with the provisions of this Annex and of high quality. The SUMP instruments shall also include strategic indicators assessing the economic relevance of multimodal terminals and combined transport solutions to the interests of transport operators, hauliers, businesses and SMEs with the aim of creating favourable conditions for sustainable investments and strategic planning across urban and peripheral areas of high economic importance for the local communities.
Amendment 13 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 24 a (new) Amendment 14 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 (26) Exemptions from the infrastructure requirements applicable to the core, extended core and comprehensive network should be possible only in duly justified cases and subject to certain conditions. This should include cases where investment cannot be justified, or where there are specific geographic or significant physical constraints, for example in outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions or in sparsely populated areas, or for isolated or partially isolated networks. In the case of sparsely populated areas, exemptions should only be applicable to infrastructures that are situated in areas of origin or destination, and not to infrastructures that are crucial transit points.
Amendment 15 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 26 a (new) (26 a) Such exemptions should in no way hamper the rights of accessibility of all transport users to the networks in peripheral areas, and should not undermine services which are vital for business, including SMEs, in urban and industrial areas of hig economic importance.
Amendment 16 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 32 (32) In order to establish the trans- European transport network in a coordinated and timely manner, thereby making it possible to maximise network effects, Member States concerned should ensure that appropriate measures are taken to finalise the projects of common interest of the core, the extended core and the comprehensive network by the given deadlines 2030, 2040 and 2050 respectively. To this end, Member States should ensure that there is coherence of the national transport and investment plans with the priorities set out in this Regulation and in the work plans of the European Coordinators. Member States should also make sure that the goals of the national recovery and resilience plans, as well as other national investment plans, complement with the objectives of the trans-European transport network.
Amendment 17 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 34 (34) Projects of common interest to develop the trans-European transport network in line with the requirements set out in this Regulation have European added value, as they contribute to a high- quality, interoperable and multimodal European network strenghtening the functioning of the internal market, increasing the sustainability, accessibility, cohesion
Amendment 18 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 35 (35) Member States and other project promoters should ensure that assessments of projects of common interest are carried out efficiently, avoiding unnecessary delays.
Amendment 19 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 36 (36) Projects of common interest for which Union funding is sought should be the subject of a socio-economic cost- benefit analysis based on a recognised methodology, taking into account the relevant social, economic, climate-related and environmental benefits and costs as well as the life-cycle approach and the degree of accessibility for all transport users from the early stages of the projects. The analysis of climate-related and environmental costs and benefits should be based on the environmental impact assessment carried out pursuant to Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council21 . _________________ 21 Directive 2011/92/EU of the European
Amendment 2 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 5 (5) The planning, development and operation of the trans-European transport network should enable sustainable forms of transport, provide for improved multimodal and interoperable transport solutions and for an enhanced intermodal integration of the entire production chain and the entire logistic chain, thereby contributing to a smooth functioning of the internal market by creating the arteries that are necessary for smooth passenger and freight transport flows across the Union. In addition, the network should aim at strengthening economic, social and
Amendment 20 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 38 (38) Cooperation with third countries, including neighbouring countries, is necessary in order to ensure connection and interoperability between the infrastructure networks of the Union and those countries, in addition to continuous and high-standard accessibility along the networks in such countries. In view of this, where appropriate, the Union should promote projects of common interest with those countries, assessing and ensuring that the objectives and requirements of the trans-
Amendment 21 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 (39) To achieve transformation of the transport sector into a truly multimodal system of sustainable and smart mobility services, the Union should build a high quality transport network with rail services meeting minimum line speed. Competitive passenger rail has a high potential for the decarbonisation of transport. T
Amendment 22 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 39 a (new) (39 a) In order to achieve such objectives, accessibility of rail services should be increased for passengers, including for persons with disabilities or reduced mobility. Passengers should have a seamless user experience when searching, selecting and buying their railway services. Therefore, sector-based solutions that aim to create a common European platform for the emission of tickets in a multimodal way should be supported. That platform should provide passengers with clear and complete information on their travels, as well as a single ticket for their cross-border trips valid across all Member States.
Amendment 23 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 40 (40)
Amendment 24 #
(42) ERTMS should be deployed in a continuous and synchronised manner not only on the core network, extended core network and comprehensive network, including in the urban nodes, but also on access routes to multimodal terminals. This will enable operations with ERTMS only and boost the business case of railway undertakings.
Amendment 25 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 44 a (new) (44 a) Given the importance of the deployment of ERTMS to ensure equal and increased access to the traffic routes to all rail freight transport businessess, it is vital that Member States and Union Institutions devote great financial efforts to ensure an accelerated deployment of ERTMS radio based system across the whole rail transport network, along with the retrofit of all types of rolling stock.
Amendment 26 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 (49) The trans-European transport network should ensure efficient multimodality in order to allow better and more sustainable modal choices to be made for passengers and freight and in order to enable large volumes to be consolidated for transfers over long distances. Multimodal terminals should play a key role to meet this objective. Moreover, their economic relevance to the operations of businesses, including SMEs, and hauliers in connection with the related road and rail stretches, other than urban nodes and areas of high economic importance in central and industrial peripheral areas, should be properly assessed in order to foster greater public and private investments in multimodal terminals and combined transport operations. The design and construction of transport infrastructure should comply with the relevant requirements laid down in national law and Union law.
Amendment 27 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 49 a (new) (49 a) When defining the investment strategy on multimodal terminals and combined operations, the authorities and the stakeholders involved should also take due account of the costs of the operations in the terminal which are borne by the carriers and by the terminal owners, with the aim of assessing the requirements of such terminals in terms of innovation, technological upgrades and capacity potential, as well as the related expected impact of innovation investments and public financing on the operations of the transport operators involved.
Amendment 28 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 50 (50) Urban nodes play an important role on the trans-European transport network as starting point or final destination ("last mile") for passengers and freight moving on the trans-European transport network and are points of transfer within or between different transport modes. It should be ensured that capacity bottlenecks, in particular for alternative fuels and recharging infrastructures, and an insufficient network connectivity within urban nodes do no longer hamper multimodality and combined transport solutions along the whole trans-European transport network.
Amendment 29 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 (51) As an effective single framework for tackling urban mobility challenges, urban nodes should develop a Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan (SUMP), which is a long-term, all-encompassing integrated freight and passenger mobility plan for the
Amendment 3 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 8 a (new) (8 a) The planning of new infrastructure, as well as the maintenance and upgrading works of older infrastructures of the trans-European transport network, should take into consideration active mode infrastructures, including walking and cycling infrastructures, in order to avoid disproportionate disruptions and disconnections to short distance paths, to alleviate congestion on the road and rail network and to remove existing barriers. Active mode infrastructures also contribute to the Union's climate goals, improve public health and provide economic benefits.
Amendment 30 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 51 a (new) (51 a) The SUMP instruments should also include strategic indicators assessing the economic relevance of multimodal terminals and combined transport solutions to the interests of transport operators, hauliers, businesses and SMEs with the aim of fostering sustainable investments and strategic planning across urban and peripheral areas of high economic importance for the local communities.
Amendment 31 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 52 (52) Member States should establish a national SUMP support programme aimed at promoting the uptake of SUMPs and improving coordination among regions, cities and towns, as well as among business organisations, SMEs networks and transport companies. It should support regions and urban areas to develop high-quality SUMPs and reinforce monitoring and evaluation of the SUMP implementation through legislative measures, guidance, capacity building, assistance and possibly financial support.
Amendment 32 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 54 (54) Multimodal digital mobility services help to enhance the integration of the different transport modes by combining several transport offers into one. Their further development should contribute to nudge behaviours towards the most sustainable modes and connectivity solutions, public transport and active modes such as walking and cycling.
Amendment 33 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 55 (55) Information and Communication Technology (ICT) systems for transport are necessary in order to provide the basis for optimising traffic and transport operations and traffic safety and improving related services, including the access to networks for citizens and businesses. Information flows in the transport and mobility network should be facilitated, including through the deployment of the Union Mobility Data Space. Information to passengers, including information on ticketing, multimodal connections and reservation systems, should be available.
Amendment 34 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 57 (57) Adequate planning of the trans- European transport network is required. This also entails the implementation of specific requirements throughout the network in terms of infrastructure, ICT systems, equipment and services, including the requirements for the alternative fuel infrastructure rollout as defined in Regulation (EU) […] of the European Parliament and of the Council [on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure]23 . It is therefore necessary to ensure adequate and concerted deployment of such requirements across Europe for each transport mode and for
Amendment 35 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 58 (58) The trans-European transport network should provide the basis for the large-scale deployment of new technologies and innovation, such as 5G
Amendment 36 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 62 (62) Taking stock of the experience with regard to the crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic25 and in order to avoid traffic disruptions and contingencies in future, Member States should take into account the security and resilience of the transport infrastructure to climate change, natural hazards, human-made disasters and other disruptions affecting the functioning and the accessibility of the Union transport system, when planning infrastructure. To that aim, a permanent and automatic mechanism for activating "Green Lanes" should be established along internal borders of the Trans- European Transport Network. Moreover, the European Transport Corridors should also include important diversionary lines which can be used in case of congestion or other problems on the principal routes. In addition, due to their multimodal nature, one mode can substitute the other in case of emergencies.
Amendment 37 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 63 (63) The participation of investment organisations, banks, businesses and undertakings, including those, which are owned or controlled by a natural person of a third country or an undertaking of a third country, including those, which are established in a third country, can accelerate the realisation of the trans- European transport network. However, under specific circumstances, the participation of or contribution by undertakings owned or controlled by a natural person of a third country or an undertaking of a third country to projects of common interest might compromise security and public order in the EU. Without prejudice and in addition to the cooperation mechanism pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/45226 , greater
Amendment 38 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 64 (64) While maintenance is and will remain the main responsibility of the Member States,
Amendment 39 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 a (new) (67 a) European Coordinators play a crucial role in ensuring that the infrastructure development of the trans- European transport network is carried out in an effective and efficient way by establishing a structured dialogue with regional and local authorities and all stakeholders involved.
Amendment 4 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 (10) In order to achieve a high-quality and efficient transport infrastructure across all modes, the development, maintenance and upgrading of the trans-
Amendment 40 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 67 b (new) (67 b) In the context of this structured dialogue, and in the absence of viable logistical and modal alternatives, the European Commission should take measures to deter Member States from engaging in unilateral cross border restrictions along the network and in particular at the central nodes, to avoid hindering cross-border transit of persons, services or goods.
Amendment 41 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 (71) Taking into account the Union Action Plan on Military Mobility of March 201827 the Commission should assess the need to adapt the trans-European transport network to
Amendment 42 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 a (new) Amendment 43 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 b (new) (71 b) The lack of a southern European Transport Corridor connecting the east and west sides of the Mediterranean sea could undermine the objectives of this Regulation and should therefore be addressed in the context of the review provided for by this Regulation.
Amendment 44 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 71 c (new) (71 c) The extended and enhanced infrastructure requirements for transport set out in this Regulation require proportionate and sufficient investments and therefore for transport businesses to make proper investment plans by 2050. The short timeframe of the current multiannual financial framework (2021- 2027), including the foreseen end of the Connecting Europe Facility in 2027, will hamper the planning of investments, especially for the rail sector. Therefore, further generations of Connecting Europe Facility programmes should be envisaged to address those needs.
Amendment 45 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 72 (72) In order to maximise consistency between the guidelines and the programming of the relevant financial instruments available at Union level, trans- European transport network funding should comply with this Regulation and be based, in particular, on Regulation (EU) No 2021/1153 of the European Parliament and of the Council29
Amendment 46 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 73 (73) The achievement of the objectives of the trans-European transport network, in particular with regard to the decarbonisation and digitalisation of the transport system in the Union, requires a robust regulatory framework. Ambitious reforms should be implemented by Member States to address the challenges of sustainable transport as identified in the European Semester. The Recovery and Resilience Facility supports both reforms and investments to make transport more sustainable, reduce emissions, improve safety and efficiency. Relevant measures to that effect are included in approved Recovery and Resilience Plans. In light of this, the Commission should ensure adequate alignments between the trans- European transport network and national investment projects, in order to guarantee complete integration and alignment of investments carried out under EU funds and national funds, such as national recovery and resilience plans.
Amendment 47 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point o (o) ‘sustainable urban mobility plan’ (SUMP) means a document for strategic mobility planning, aiming at improving accessibility to and mobility within the functional urban area (including commuting zones) and peripheral industrial centres) for people, businesses and goods;
Amendment 48 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point p a (new) (p a) 'costs of the operations in the terminal' means the costs borne by the transport operators at the terminal incurred to carry out such operations;
Amendment 49 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point z (z) ‘maritime port’ means an area of land and water made up of such infrastructure and equipment so as to permit, principally, the reception of waterborne vessels, their loading and unloading, the storage of goods, the receipt and delivery or further transmission of those goods and the embarkation and disembarkation of passengers, crew and other persons and any other infrastructure necessary for transport operators within the port area;
Amendment 5 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 a (new) (10 a) Member States should develop strategies, in consultation with local authorities and businesses, on the infrastructural, logistical and transportation needs of smaller production centres, in order to ensure coherence and synergies betwee the trans- European transport network infrastructures and internal areas with smaller centres of production that are not covered by the trans-European transport network.
Amendment 50 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – introductory part 2. The trans-European transport network shall strengthen the social, economic and territorial cohesion of the Union and contribute to the strengthening of the internal market through the creation of a single European transport area which is sustainable, efficient digitalised and resilient and which increases the benefits for all its users, including accessibility, and supports inclusive growth. It shall demonstrate European added value by contributing to the objectives laid down in the following four categories:
Amendment 51 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point a – point ii (ii) enabling greater use of more sustainable modes of transport, including by but not limited to further developing a long-distance rail passenger network at high speed and a fully interoperable rail freight network, a reliable inland waterway and short-sea shipping network across the Union;
Amendment 52 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i (i) improving the accessibility and connectivity of all regions of the Union, including outermost regions and other remote, insular, peripheral and mountainous regions as well as sparsely populated areas;
Amendment 53 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point b – point i a (new) (i a) increased access to the transport infrastructure for SMEs;
Amendment 54 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point c – point vii a (new) (vii a) increased connections and sustainable, high quality transport solutions for businesses and SMEs in isolated and peripheral centres of production.
Amendment 55 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – introductory part (d) increasing the benefits for all its users through:
Amendment 56 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point ii a (new) (ii a) ensuring seamless travel experience for users, including extensive protection of passenger rights and price transparency;
Amendment 57 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point ii b (new) (ii b) creating opportunities and greater economic benefits to businesses and SMEs, including improving their access to high-quality, intermodal, fast and sustainable freight transport to enable connections between peripheral and isolated centres of production with densely populated areas of high commercial value;
Amendment 58 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 – point d – point v a (new) Amendment 59 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 4 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Free access without any discrimination as well as fair competition shall be ensured by Member States and all public and private entities involved in the development of the trans-European transport network. This shall be done in accordance with Union transparency policy decisions.
Amendment 6 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 b (new) (10 b) In the development of the trans- European transport network, special attention should be given to ensure that access to the market is guaranteed to SMEs.
Amendment 60 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the optimisation of infrastructure integration and interconnection between urban nodes, bigger cities and peripheral areas;
Amendment 61 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) the deployment of alternative fuels recharging and refuelling infrastructure easily accessible to users;
Amendment 62 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) the taking into account of possible synergies with other networks, including active modes networks, and in particular the trans-European energy or telecommunication networks;
Amendment 63 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 6 – paragraph 2 2. The comprehensive network shall consist of all existing and planned transport infrastructures of the trans-European transport network as well as measures promoting the efficient and socially and environmentally sustainable use of such infrastructure provided for in Article 5(1).
Amendment 64 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 8 – paragraph 5 5. The Commission may require Member States by means of an implementing act to establish a single entity for the construction and management of cross-border infrastructure projects of common interest
Amendment 65 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c (c) ensuring optimal integration of the transport modes and interoperability between transport modes
Amendment 66 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new) (c a) fostering accessibility to the network for all kind of transport users, including persons with disabilities or reduced mobility and other people in situations of vulnerability;
Amendment 67 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c b (new) (c b) ensuring easy and digitalised access to freight transport and shipping services, other than facilitated use of intermodal terminal and facilities to hauliers and all businesses and SMEs in order to promote the use by shippers of sustainable multimodal freight services;
Amendment 68 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new) (i a) seeking synergies across all modes of transport, including active modes, and removing barriers to active mobility when infrastructure is being upgraded;
Amendment 69 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 13 – paragraph 1 – point b (b) the development of a high performance rail passenger network, fully interoperable and at high speed, connecting urban nodes as well as capital and major cities across the Union;
Amendment 7 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 10 c (new) Amendment 70 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 14 – paragraph 1 – point a – introductory part (a) railway lines, both high speed and conventional, including:
Amendment 71 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 2 – point e a (new) (e a) allows for a sufficient number of safe crossing points for active modes to avoid disproportionate disruption to active mobility, without hampering the quality of the service, especially for high-speed trains;
Amendment 72 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 15 – paragraph 3 – point b (b) at the request of a Member State, only in duly justified cases, other exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements referred to in paragraph 2. Any request for exemption shall be based on a socio- economic cost-benefit analysis that takes into account the need to preserve services which are vital for businessess and SMEs in urban and industrial areas of high economic importance and an assessment of the impact on interoperability and accessibility. An exemption shall comply with the requirements of Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the European Parliament and of the Council58 , be coordinated and agreed with the neighbouring Member State(s) where applicable. _________________ 58 Directive (EU) 2016/797 of the
Amendment 73 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 2 – point c – paragraph 2 When constructing or upgrading a passenger line of the extended core network or sections thereof, Member States shall, where applicable, perform a study to analyse the feasibility and economic relevance of higher speeds, and build or upgrade the line to such higher speed where its feasibility and economic relevance are demonstrated. The study shall also take into account the potential impact on passengers during the constructing or upgrading phase.
Amendment 74 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 16 – paragraph 5 – point b (b) at the request of a Member State, only in duly justified cases, other exemptions may be granted by the Commission by means of implementing acts in respect of the requirements referred to in paragraphs 2 to 4. Any exemption shall be based on a socio-economic cost- benefit analysis that takes into account the need to preserve services which are vital for businessess and SMEs in urban and industrial areas of high economic importance and an assessment of the impact on
Amendment 75 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 17 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) ERTMS is equipped, while ensuring a synchronised and harmonised ERTMS deployment trackside and on board of trains;
Amendment 76 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point a (a) where relevant, mitigating the impact of noise and vibration caused by rail transport, in particular through measures for rolling stock and for infrastructure, including noise protection barriers;
Amendment 77 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point f (f) when building or upgrading railway infrastructure, ensure the continuity and accessibility of pedestrian a
Amendment 78 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g (g) where relevant, developing innovative alternative fuels technologies for railways, such as hydrogen for sections that are exempted from the electrification requirement.
Amendment 79 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 19 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new) (g a) possible synergies with other modes of transport, including active modes, for the integration of other infrastructures alongside rail lines or within bridges and tunnels.
Amendment 8 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 16 (16) The interests of regional and local authorities, as well as those of the public concerned by a project of common interest, as well as those of businesses and SMEs, should be appropriately taken into account in the planning and construction phase of projects.
Amendment 80 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 21 – paragraph 2 a (new) 2 a. Member States shall, where possible and where proportionate, allow for a sufficient number of safe crossing points for active modes to avoid disproportionate disruption to active mobility.
Amendment 81 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 23 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new) (e a) possible synergies with other modes of transport, including active modes, for the integration of other infrastructures alongside inland waterways or within bridges.
Amendment 82 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 24 – paragraph 3 – point k a (new) (k a) dual use infrastructure utilised for civilian and military purposes.
Amendment 83 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 27 – paragraph 1 – point e (e) improve the resilience of the logistic chains and international maritime trade and security of the energy supply, including in relation to climate adaptation;
Amendment 84 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 28 – paragraph 1 – point a – point x a (new) (x a) infrastructure for active modes such as pedestrian and cycle tracks, bridges or tunnels, including alternative routes for active modes.
Amendment 85 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point b (b) rest areas are available at a maximum distance of 60 km from each other, providing sufficient parking space, relevant safety and security equipment, and appropriate facilities, including sanitary facilities, that meet the needs of a diverse workforce;
Amendment 86 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point c (c) safe and secure parking areas are available at a maximum distance of 100 km from each other,
Amendment 87 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 29 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new) (d a) allows for a sufficient number of safe crossing points for active modes to avoid disproportionate disruption to active mobility;
Amendment 88 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) when building or upgrading road infrastructure, ensure the road infrastructure is not obstructing the continuity and accessibility of pedestrian and cycling
Amendment 89 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) possible synergies with other modes of transport, including active modes, for the integration of other infrastructures alongside roads or within bridges and tunnels.
Amendment 9 #
Proposal for a regulation Recital 17 (17) The definition of the trans- European transport network should be based on a common and transparent methodology and should represent the highest level of infrastructure planning within the Union. It should be multimodal, that is to say it should include all transport modes and their connections as well as relevant traffic and travel information management systems
Amendment 90 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 31 – paragraph 1 a (new) The Commission shall, by 31 December 2025, conduct a feasibility study on the potential use of European Modular System vehicles on the road infrastructure for the TEN-T core network.
Amendment 91 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 34 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) improving multimodal interconnections between airports and infrastructure of other transport modes, and between airports and urban nodes where appropriate
Amendment 92 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i (i) adoption and publication of a sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP) in line with Annex V that includes notably measures to integrate the different modes of transport, to promote efficient zero- emission mobility including sustainable and zero-emission urban logistics, to reduce air and noise pollution and that takes long-distance trans-European transport flows into consideration;
Amendment 93 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii (ii) collection and submission to the Commission and publication in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council1a of urban mobility data per urban node covering at minimum greenhouse gas emissions, congestion, accidents and injuries, modal share and access to mobility service, as well as data on air and noise pollution. Thereafter these data shall be submitted
Amendment 94 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) by 31 December 2040: the development of at least one multimodal freight terminal allowing for sufficient transhipment capacity within or in the vicinity of the urban node. One terminal may serve more than one urban node, if capacity allows.
Amendment 95 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 40 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new) (d a) compliance with the adopted sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs).
Amendment 96 #
Proposal for a regulation Chapter IV – title IV PROVISIONS FOR SMART, ACCESSIBLE AND RESILIENT TRANSPORT
Amendment 97 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point d (d) improve the safety and sustainability of the movement of persons, services and of the transport of goods;
Amendment 98 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 44 – paragraph 1 – point i (i) introduce dual use technology, security technology and compatible identification standards on the networks;
Amendment 99 #
Proposal for a regulation Article 45 – paragraph 1 Member States shall ensure that transport infrastructure provides for safe and secure passenger and freight movements throughout the infrastructure life cycle.
source: 734.383
|
History
(these mark the time of scraping, not the official date of the change)
docs/18 |
|
events/8 |
|
forecasts |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st readingNew
Awaiting Council's 1st reading position |
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
forecasts/0 |
|
docs/17 |
|
events/7/docs |
|
events/7 |
|
docs/16 |
|
forecasts |
|
docs/16/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
docs/17/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
docs/18/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
docs/0 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/16/date |
Old
2023-03-21T00:00:00New
2023-03-20T00:00:00 |
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
docs/18 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/18/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
docs/19 |
|
docs/20 |
|
events/0 |
|
events/4 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/18 |
|
docs/18/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
docs/19 |
|
docs/19/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
docs/20 |
|
docs/20/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
events/0 |
|
events/4 |
|
docs/16 |
|
events/4/summary |
|
docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-21T00:00:00New
2023-03-20T00:00:00 |
docs/18/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
docs/19/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
docs/18/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
docs/19/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-21T00:00:00New
2023-03-20T00:00:00 |
docs/18/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
docs/19/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
docs/18/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
docs/19/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
events/6 |
|
events/5 |
|
docs/16/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0147_EN.html
|
events/4/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0147_EN.html
|
docs/16 |
|
events/4 |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Awaiting committee decisionNew
Awaiting Parliament's position in 1st reading |
docs/16/date |
Old
2023-03-21T00:00:00New
2023-03-20T00:00:00 |
docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
docs/18/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
events/2 |
|
events/3 |
|
procedure/Other legal basis |
Rules of Procedure EP 159
|
docs/16/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
docs/17/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
docs/18/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
docs/16/date |
Old
2023-03-21T00:00:00New
2023-03-20T00:00:00 |
docs/17/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
docs/18/date |
Old
2023-03-01T00:00:00New
2023-02-28T00:00:00 |
docs/16/date |
Old
2023-03-20T00:00:00New
2023-03-21T00:00:00 |
docs/17/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
docs/18/date |
Old
2023-02-28T00:00:00New
2023-03-01T00:00:00 |
docs/16 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/16 |
|
docs/17 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities/0 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15/date |
Old
2022-11-22T00:00:00New
2023-01-25T00:00:00 |
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/15/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/REGI-AD-736359_EN.html
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/15/date |
Old
2022-12-01T00:00:00New
2022-12-05T00:00:00 |
docs/9/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-738648_EN.html
|
docs/10/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-738702_EN.html
|
docs/11/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-738716_EN.html
|
docs/13/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TRAN-AM-738715_EN.html
|
docs/14 |
|
docs/15 |
|
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/12/date |
Old
2022-11-17T00:00:00New
2022-11-22T00:00:00 |
docs/13 |
|
docs/13/date |
Old
2022-11-17T00:00:00New
2022-11-22T00:00:00 |
docs/11 |
|
docs/12 |
|
docs/13 |
|
docs/9 |
|
docs/10 |
|
docs/8 |
|
docs/7/summary |
|
docs/5/docs/0/url |
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/parlements_nationaux/com/2021/0812/FR_SENATE_AVIS-COM(2021)0812_EN.pdf
|
committees/3/rapporteur |
|
docs/7 |
|
links |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/6/docs/0/url |
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/IMCO-AD-730131_EN.html
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/6 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
procedure/Legislative priorities |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/4/docs/0/url |
https://dmsearch.eesc.europa.eu/search/public?k=(documenttype:AC)(documentnumber:6389)(documentyear:2021)(documentlanguage:EN)
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/5/date |
Old
2022-05-30T00:00:00New
2022-06-08T00:00:00 |
docs/6 |
|
events/0 |
|
docs/5 |
|
docs/6 |
|
docs/0 |
|
docs/0 |
|
committees/0/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows/2 |
|
events |
|
procedure/dossier_of_the_committee |
|
procedure/stage_reached |
Old
Preparatory phase in ParliamentNew
Awaiting committee decision |
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/0/shadows/1 |
|
committees/4/rapporteur |
|
committees/0/shadows |
|
committees/2/opinion |
False
|
procedure/title |
Old
Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport networkNew
Trans-European transport network |
commission |
|
committees/1/opinion |
False
|
committees/3/opinion |
False
|
docs/0/docs/0 |
|
docs/0/summary |
|